• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Monthly Archives: May 2018

Going up

24 Thursday May 2018

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Donald Trump, fuel, gas, missouri

Today in west central Missouri:

Thanks for nothing Donald Trump.

Missouri House Special Investigative Committee on Oversight – Scott Faughn

23 Wednesday May 2018

Posted by Michael Bersin in Missouri General Assembly, Missouri Governor, Missouri House, Missouri Senate, social media

≈ 9 Comments

Tags

Eric Greitens, governor, impeachment, investigation, Missouri House Special Investigative Committee on Oversight, Scott Faughn, social media, Twitter

The Missouri House Special Investigative Committee on Oversight charged with investigating Governor Eric Greitens (r) heard testimony from Scott Faughn from around 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. The hearing was available via live stream.

The committee was very interested in the source of the (now) $120,000.00 in cash from Scott Faughn to Al Watkins, the attorney for the spouse of the witness. Scott Faughn stated, several times, that the money was his.

My running comments on the testimony, via Twitter:

Missouri House Special Investigative Committee on Oversight – hearing live stream
Scott Faughn – $120,000 total – three to four deliveries. Cash, no check.

Scott Faughn – Chuck Hatfield – advises client to not answer internal financial information.

Scott Faughn – “This was my money. Not going to get into the inner workings of my business.”

Scott Faughn – Chairman, “I don’t believe it’s your money.”

Scott Faughn – Chairman, “Was it someone in the low income housing industry?” “Was it an out of state Republican donor?”

Scott Faughn – “What I got [for the money] is a set of tapes.”

Scott Faughn – “It’s perfectly lawful in America to conduct business in cash.”

Scott Faughn – “I had one brief conversation with Witness One to ask for an interview” “She said, no.” “It was very brief, she hung up, that was it.”

Scott Faughn – “I only ever spoke to Mr. Watkins [not witness’ husband].”

Scott Faughn – “I think there are rumors about the present governor that anyone who listens would hear.”

Scott Faughn – In response to question – Heard rumors about tapes from anyone who wasn’t supporting Eric Greitens for Governor.

Scott Faughn – “The money was my money.” In response to question, the tapes were for a book.

Scott Faughn – Committee keeps asking about the physical source of the cash used to pay for the tapes.

Scott Faughn – I think everybody in Missouri politics had an inkling about what was on the tapes [in 2017].

Scott Faughn – In response to statement/question: “I’ve never counted the pages [about himelf on MO CaseNet].”

Scott Faughn – Question: “Did you sign a nondisclosure agreement with [Al Watkins]”? “No.”

Scott Faughn – “I think it’s surely hard for anyone to say they’re in the know in Missouri politics [these days].”
Amen.

Scott Faughn – Committee keeps asking about source of the money, Faughn (with advice of counsel) keeps refusing. Faughan keeps stating that he won’t discuss details of his private business.

Scott Faughn – First heard rumors [about Greitens affair] in summer of 2015. So widespread that no one specific source.

Chris Koster is probably banging his head on a desk right now.

Scott Faughn – Question: “Where have you been for the last few weeks?” Discussion of subpeonas. Hatfield, “We’re going to have to come back?”

Scott Faughn – spoke briefly with Kim Gardner in late January/February, twice – to ask for an interview – she declined, did not comment on Greitens case.

Scott Faughn – “This is a very unique situation…I didn’t break the story…I did become a distraction to what you’re tying to do…”

The chair of the committee denied a request for cross examination from someone in the public seating area. I wonder who?

In Recess. Open mic – member of the committee speculating on mechanics in source of the money with a another member of the committee.

Previously:

Missouri House Special Investigative Committee on Oversight – transcript of witness deposition – cross examination (May 23, 2018)

Missouri House Special Investigative Committee on Oversight – transcript of witness deposition – on Koster and Greitens (May 22, 2018)

HR 2: Special Investigative Committee on Oversight – the process for impeachment (May 22, 2018)

Missouri House Special Investigative Committee on Oversight – transcript of witness deposition – cross examination

23 Wednesday May 2018

Posted by Michael Bersin in Missouri General Assembly, Missouri Governor, Missouri House, Missouri Senate, social media

≈ 11 Comments

Tags

Eric Greitens, governor, impeachment, investigation, missouri, Missouri House Special Investigative Committee on Oversight

The Missouri House Special Investigative Committee on Oversight charged with investigating Governor Eric Greitens (r) continued reading transcripts of depositions into the record via live stream today.

The attorney for Governor Eric Greitens (r) cross examined the witness at length.

Summing it up:

Brittany Burke @BrittanyHBurke
Not a single person should be shocked by how @EricGreitens’ legal team treated this woman. This is what we do. We bully, shame, intimidate and discredit victims. This happens all day long in all offices, all workplaces and by all persons in position of power. #MoLeg #Greitens
3:48 PM – 23 May 2018

My running commentary via Twitter:

Committee went into closed session to review images introduced into deposition from porn site – unanimously voted that images were not of the witness.
My God.

Transcript of deposition: Now more on “Fifty Shades of Grey”. Then question to witness: “Do you wear a bikini?”
Really?

Transcript of deposition: badgering of witness by Greitens’ attorney over who called her a “whore” when.
Really?

Transcript of deposition: Badgering of witness by Greitens’ attorney – “Lie of ommision.” Repeated.
Can you imagine the video of the cross examination?

Transcript of deposition: EG asked witness at salon, subequently, “Did you tell anyone?” Witness told EG “No.”

EG’s attorney is establishing by his questions in the deposition that EG’s affair was not a single incident, but a series. How does that work with EG’s “family values” cred? Just asking.

Transcript of deposition: Line of questioning by EG’s attorney – assuming a physical encounter would happen because it had happened in the past.
Uh…no.

Transcript of deposition: EG’s attorney asks witness about viewing porn sites or sending her image in states of undress or nude.
Looking forward to the transcript of EG being asked the same thing.

Transcript of deposition: EG’s attorney asks witness if she has or ever had a nipple ring. Witness, “No.”
How the hell is this relevant?

Transcript of deposition: EG’s attorney – pressing witness about not telling any lies “in 2018”.
Witness: “I’m not God, so I don’t know.”

Transcript of deposition: EG attorney to witness – you can’t say by “touch, sight, or smell” that the photo ever existed. Interestingly, he didn’t use the term “hearing” (the shutter sound).

There was a line of questioning about #MeToo. Eric Greitens’ attorney asking if anyone had reached out to the witness to become the face of the movement.

Missouri House Special Investigative Committee on Oversight – hearing live stream
Deposition transcript – EG attorney – Stacey Newman texted witness. Witness, “I had like eight million texts at that time.”

Previously:

Missouri House Special Investigative Committee on Oversight – transcript of witness deposition – on Koster and Greitens (May 22, 2018)

HR 2: Special Investigative Committee on Oversight – the process for impeachment (May 22, 2018)

Fauna

23 Wednesday May 2018

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

deer, fauna, missouri

This morning in west central Missouri:

HR 2: Special Investigative Committee on Oversight – the process for impeachment

22 Tuesday May 2018

Posted by Michael Bersin in Missouri General Assembly, Missouri Governor, Missouri House, Missouri Senate

≈ 10 Comments

Tags

Eric Greitens, General Assembly, HR 2, impeachment, investigation, missouri, Missouri House Special Investigative Committee on Oversight

Reported Do Pass by the House Special Investigative Committee on Oversight:

HOUSE RESOLUTION NO. 2 [pdf]

WHEREAS, on February 27, 2018, the Speaker of the House of Representatives appointed the Special Investigative Committee on Oversight; and
WHEREAS, on March 1, 2018, the House of Representatives4 unanimously adopted House Resolution 5565, which authorized the Special Investigative Committee on Oversight to investigate allegations against Governor Eric R. Greitens and report back to the House of Representatives; and
WHEREAS, on April 11, 2018, the Special Investigative Committee on Oversight submitted a report of its findings relating to such investigation. On April 30, 2018, such committee submitted a supplement to its first report. On May 2, 2018, such committee submitted a second report of its findings relating to such investigation; and
WHEREAS, under the authority given in Section 18, Article III of the Constitution of Missouri, the House of Representatives adopted rules of procedure for the hearings and investigations of the Special Investigative Committee on Oversight in House Resolution 5565:
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that we, the members of the Missouri House of Representatives, Ninety-ninth General Assembly, First Special Session of the Second Regular Session, pursuant to House Rule 64(3), hereby authorize the Special Investigative Committee on Oversight to recommend disciplinary actions including, but not limited to, remonstrance or censure or introduce upon report articles of impeachment; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Special Investigative Committee on Oversight shall consist of ten members of the House of Representatives appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives, not more than seven members being from the same political party; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Rules of the House of Representatives, Ninety-ninth General Assembly, and the following rules shall apply during the second regular session and any special session of the Ninety-ninth General Assembly, as appropriate:

RULE 1
Any hearings upon such issue shall be commenced at such time and place as determined by the chair. A recess may be requested by any member of the committee. Adjournments shall be determined by the chair. The special committee shall be allowed to meet or conduct hearings during the session of the House of Representatives without requesting leave of the House of Representatives.
RULE 2
Any hearings shall be open to the public and press, except that the committee, upon a majority vote, may close all or a portion of such hearings to hear the testimony of certain witnesses, review evidence, or for purposes of meeting with committee counsel. Counsel for the Governor shall be allowed to attend any closed hearings involving the testimony of witnesses. At the conclusion of the investigation, the committee shall prepare a transcript of the hearings, except that the committee, upon a majority vote, may order that the identity of certain witnesses, certain testimony, or certain evidence be redacted, blurred, or obfuscated in a manner to protect the identity or privacy of any witness. At the conclusion of the investigation, the committee shall make a copy of all committee records available to any member of the House of Representatives, except that the committee, upon a majority vote, may order that the identity of certain witnesses, certain testimony, or certain evidence be redacted, blurred, or obfuscated in a manner to protect the identity or privacy of any witness. All public hearings shall be recorded and live-streamed on the website of the House of Representatives. The chair shall determine the extent and the manner in which cameras or other audio or visual recording devices and ancillary lighting and electrical equipment shall be allowed at such hearings.
RULE 3
Only appointed members of the special committee may question witnesses.
RULE 4
Only persons called as witnesses by the special committee may testify as witnesses. Any person called as a witness, or his or her legal counsel, may file a sworn written statement relevant to the purpose, subject matter, and scope of the committee’s proceedings. Any other person desiring to testify as a witness may petition the committee for permission to testify by presenting a written statement of the substance of the proposed testimony to the chair at least twenty-four hours prior to the testimony. The committee, upon a majority vote, shall have discretion of whether to allow such person to testify as a witness.
RULE 5
All witnesses shall testify under the following oath, which shall be administered by the chair:
“Do you solemnly swear (or affirm) that the testimony you shall give in the hearing now pending before this committee shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?”.
RULE 6
Formal rules of evidence shall not apply to the hearings. The committee may compel the attendance of witnesses and the production of any paper or document, enforce obedience of its orders, preserve11 order, and punish in a summary way contempt of and disobedience to its authority. The sergeant-at-arms of the House of Representatives, under direction of the committee, shall execute the lawful orders of the committee and may employ such aid and assistance as may be necessary to carry out and enforce such orders.
RULE 7
Subpoenas for the appearance of witnesses and subpoenas duces tecum for the production of any paper or document shall be issued by the Speaker of the House of Representatives, upon request of the committee, in the manner prescribed by law. A subpoena or subpoena duces tecum may be enforced by statutory or common law, or by applying to a judge of the circuit court of Cole County for an order to show cause why the subpoena or subpoena duces tecum should not be enforced.
RULE 8
The chair shall preside over the hearings and shall rule on all questions regarding decorum and procedure. The committee, upon a majority vote, shall rule on all questions regarding the admission or rejection of testimony. The chair may request assistance from any law enforcement agency to maintain order at the hearings and in the hallways and spaces adjoining the hearing area. The chair shall rule on any appropriate matter not covered by these rules.
RULE 9
Each witness has the right to legal counsel and the right to be accompanied by such counsel. No witness or his or her counsel shall be admitted to the room in which the hearing is being conducted until such person is called by the committee for such person’s testimony.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that notice shall be provided to the public at least twenty-four hours in advance of all hearings of the committee and shall contain the time, location, and subject matter of the hearing. Such notice shall include the identity of any witness whose testimony may be offered. Under exigent circumstances and upon a majority vote of the committee, notice of the identity of a witness may be given less than twenty-four hours in advance; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that if any documentary evidence is to be offered at any hearing, copies thereof shall be made available to the members of the committee at least twenty-four hours in advance of such hearing unless good cause is shown for later disclosure; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Rules of Civil Procedure and the Rules of Criminal Procedure shall not apply to hearings conducted by the Special Investigative Committee on Oversight or during the consideration of any findings and recommendations of the committee by the House of Representatives; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, after all evidence has been presented and all witnesses have been heard, in the discretion of the chairman, counsel for interested parties shall be allowed to make presentations, both orally or in writing, to the committee, subject to reasonable time limitations as determined by the chairman; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that if the Special Investigative Committee on Oversight recommends that disciplinary actions or articles of impeachment be considered, such committee shall hold at least one public hearing to consider disciplinary actions or articles of impeachment prior to introducing such upon report. A draft of any disciplinary actions or articles of impeachment shall be distributed by the chairman to all members of the Special Investigative Committee on Oversight at least twenty-four hours and one legislative day prior to such public hearing; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, pursuant to House Rule 64(3), any disciplinary actions or articles of impeachment introduced upon report by the Special Investigative Committee on Oversight shall be read by title on three separate days and may be considered by the House of Representatives without referral to committee. Any such disciplinary actions or articles shall lay on the calendar for one legislative day prior to being read a third time; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall designate two members of the Special Investigative Committee on Oversight as floor handlers, one from the majority party of the House of Representatives and one from the minority party of the House of Representatives, who shall present the results of the investigation of the Special Investigative Committee on Oversight and any disciplinary actions or articles of impeachment to the House of Representatives. Such presentation shall not count against the time limitations of either party; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that there shall be a ten-hour limitation on the total time of floor debate allowed for the purpose of discussing the findings of the Special Investigative Committee on Oversight and considering any disciplinary actions or articles of impeachment. Such time shall be divided equally between, and controlled by, the majority floor leader and the minority floor leader, or their designees. The majority party floor handler shall have the right to the final ten minutes of designated time. If time has been allocated and unused by either side after all disciplinary actions or articles of impeachment have been considered and no member from that side is seeking recognition to further discuss any disciplinary action or article of impeachment, the Speaker may declare additional time waived and recognize the members from the other side to complete the use of their time. No member, other than the floor handlers, shall be allowed to speak or inquire longer than the Rules of the House of Representatives otherwise allow. For speaking purposes, each disciplinary action or article shall be treated as a separate question; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that no motion to recommit any disciplinary action or article of impeachment shall be in order; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that if the House of Representatives is satisfied that there is good cause to impeach or otherwise discipline Governor Eric R. Greitens, the disciplinary actions or articles of impeachment drafted by the Special Investigative Committee on Oversight shall be immediately considered, amended, and approved; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that each disciplinary action or article of impeachment shall be considered and amended individually and shall be considered approved upon a vote of those members elected, pursuant to Section 27, Article III of the Constitution of Missouri; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any articles of impeachment approved by the House of Representatives shall be delivered by the Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives to the Senate, pursuant to sections 106.040 and 106.080, RSMo, for consideration by the special commission of seven eminent jurists elected by the Senate pursuant to Section 2, Article VII of the Constitution of Missouri; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that if the House of Representatives adopts any articles of impeachment, the House of Representatives shall elect two managers to prosecute the impeachment pursuant to section 106.040, RSMo, one from the majority party and one from the minority party. The special counsel for the Special Investigative Committee on Oversight shall, under the direction of the managers, present and prosecute the articles of impeachment adopted by the House of Representatives before the jurists elected by the Senate to final conclusion.

That’s the process.

Missouri House Special Investigative Committee on Oversight – transcript of witness deposition – on Koster and Greitens

22 Tuesday May 2018

Posted by Michael Bersin in Missouri General Assembly, Missouri Governor, Missouri House, Missouri Senate

≈ 11 Comments

Tags

Eric Greitens., General Asembly, governor, impeachment, investigation, missouri, Missouri House Special Investigative Committee on Oversight, transcript

The Missouri House Special Investigative Committee on Oversight charged with investigating Governor Eric Greitens (r) is reading transcripts of depositions into the record via live stream today. It’s been going on for hours.

The witnesses testimony before the grand jury was identical to the transcripts of her testimony before the committee.

The deposition transcript of the opening cross examination of the witness by Governor Greitens’ attorney(s) consists of their badgering the witness. It might make sense for a criminal trial, but makes them all look like a jerks.

And Greitens’ state funded (other) attorneys thought allowing them cross examination during the impeachment process would be a good thing?

Chris Koster (D) [2016 file photo]

The witness testified in a deposition that she cut the hair of both Chris Koster (D) and Eric Greitens (r) as her clients before the election. After the election, while she was cutting Chris Koster’s hair he told her in November of 2016 that he knew about her relationship with Greitens before the election.

Chris Koster didn’t use that information before the election. You think it would have changed the outcome?

Eric Greitens (r) [2016 file photo].

An observation from Jason Rosenbaum:

Jason Rosenbaum @jrosenbaum
FWIW: The woman told the House committee earlier this year that she cut Koster’s hair. I sensed from talking w/ Koster about Greitens that his disdain went beyond normal animosity that comes from combative nature of electoral politics.
[….]
3:32 PM – 22 May 2018

Previously:

אַ שאַנדע פֿאַר די גוים and *IOKIYAR (January 11, 2018)

Campaign Finance: helping to keep the lights on

22 Tuesday May 2018

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance, Claire McCaskill

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

campaign finance, Claire McCaskill, missouri

Senator Claire McCaskill (D) [2017 file photo].

Today at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C000960 05/22/2018 Missouri Democratic State Committee Claire McCaskill 1941 Spring House Dr St Louis MO 63122 U S Senate U S Senator 5/22/2018 $25,000.00

[emphasis added]

Every little bit helps.

Jean Peters Baker appointed as special prosecutor in Greitens (r) case

21 Monday May 2018

Posted by Michael Bersin in Missouri Governor

≈ 8 Comments

Tags

Eric Greitens, governor, Jean Peters Baker, missouri, special prosecutor

Jackson County Prosecutor Jean Peters Baker [2017 file photo].

Jackson County Prosecutor Jean Peters Baker has been appointed as the special prosecutor in the Eric Greitens (r) criminal case:

Kimberly Gardner @StLouisCityCA
I’m pleased to announce that the Prosecuting Attorney of Jackson County, Jean Peters Baker has agreed to serve as the special prosecutor in the felony Invasion of Privacy investigation against Governor Eric Greitens.
5:12 PM – 21 May 2018

Meanwhile:

Christopher Ave @ChristopherAve
“I’m not lying,” woman at center of #Greitens controversy says.
10:05 PM – 21 May 2018

Oh, my.

Previously:

Oh, my. (January 11, 2018)

Oh, my – part 2 (January 11, 2018)

Oh, my – part 3 (January 11, 2018)

אַ שאַנדע פֿאַר די גוים and *IOKIYAR (January 11, 2018)

Oh, my – part 4 (January 11, 2018)

Oh, my – part 5 (January 11, 2018)

Oh, my – part 6 (January 12, 2018)

Sen. Denny Hoskins (r): not exactly a ringing endorsement (January 12, 2018)

Gov. Eric Greitens (r): piping (January 16, 2018)

Oh, my – part 7 (January 16, 2018)

Waiting… (January 19, 2018)

Oh, my – part 8 (January 29, 2018)

The unanswered question (February 8, 2018)

RSMo § 565.252 (February 22, 2018)

Well, you were the one who used a blindfold and tape. (February 22, 2018)

Well, he was the one who used a blindfold and tape. (February 23, 2018)

A few words of advice (February 26, 2018)

Eric Greitens (r) and the House – pass the popcorn (March 6, 2018)

Oh, my – part 9 (March 6, 2018)

“That’s not how you spell bare.” (March 7, 2018)

It’s their world, the rest of us only get to live in it (April 8, 2018)

The popcorn is ready (April 10, 2018)

The Report (April 11, 2018)

Call it what it is (April 11, 2018)

Go away, asshole. (April 12, 2018)

Sen. Denny Hoskins (r-21): impeach Greitens (April 13, 2018)

Getting ironical about Greitens (April 13, 2018)

Standing ovation (April 14, 2018)

Quid pro quo (April 16, 2018)

It’s a fine mess he’s gotten himself into… (April 17, 2018)

Really, just go away… (April 17, 2018)

HR 6783: Impeachment (April 18, 2018)

Unhinged (April 19, 2018)

Really unhinged (April 19, 2019)

Seriously, just go away already… (April 20, 2018)

He doth protest too much, methinks… (April 20, 2018)

No, Chuck Raasch, nobody’s giving Eric Greitens’ scandals short shrift (April 22, 2018)

Does somebody want to tell them? (April 25, 2018)

Our life on the “D List” (April 30, 2018)

The Report – supplement (May 1, 2018)

HR 7432: Impeachment (May 1, 2018)

The second report (May 2, 2018)

Rep. Gina Mitten (D): shining a light in the dark money campaign finance neighborhood (May 2, 2018)

The process begins (May 4, 2018)

The Petition for a Special Session of the General Assembly to consider “disciplinary actions against Governor Eric R. Greitens” (May 4, 2018)

Campaign Finance: in the news (May 6, 2018)

Oxford coma (May 7, 2018)

A definition (May 13, 2018)

Felony invasion of privacy case against Eric Greitens (r) dropped (May 14, 2018)

“So far, so good…” (May 14, 2018)

Field, field, and field

21 Monday May 2018

Posted by Michael Bersin in Claire McCaskill, US Senate

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Claire McCaskill, coordinated campaign, Democrats, missouri, U.S. Senate, Warrensburg

This evening in Warrensburg the 2018 Democratic Party coordinated campaign in Missouri opened it’s 20th field office with full time staff.

In May.

In Warrensburg. 110 E. Market Street.

Phones and door to door.

The three most important things in any campaign are…

There are benefits to holding over fifty town halls across the state

21 Monday May 2018

Posted by Michael Bersin in Claire McCaskill, Town Hall, US Senate

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

#TeamClaire, bumper stickers, Claire McCaskill, Josh Hawley, missouri, U.S. Senate

People know who you are.

Josh who?

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • Campaign Finance: “I, the billionaire”
  • Current status
  • No Kings – Warrensburg, Missouri – June 14, 2026
  • Ancient history repeats
  • Campaign Finance: promising us high regressive sales taxes

Recent Comments

Steve Duane Phipps on No Kings – Warrensburg,…
No Kings – War… on Warrensburg, Missouri – No Kin…
Campaign Finance: pr… on Campaign Finance: for billiona…
Campaign Finance: wa… on About that ‘inconvenient…
Campaign Finance: ke… on About that ‘inconvenient…

Archives

  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,052,476 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...