• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Monthly Archives: February 2010

Constitutional Amendment Could Take Away Local Control & State CAFO Standards

28 Sunday Feb 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Missouri Rural Crisis Center is calling on Missourians to stop this constitutional amendment:

Representative Tom Loehner has introduced House Joint Resolution 86 (HJR 86), which would change the Missouri Constitution and could have unintended and far-reaching consequences regarding local control and even our current state CAFO standards.

This Bill Could Come to the Floor Monday…

Please Call Now!!!

Please call (contact info below):

  • Your Own Representative,
  • Rep. Tilley, the Majority Floor Leader (the person who makes decisions about what comes to the House Floor),
  • Rep. Richard, the Speaker of the House,
  • Rep. Loehner, sponsor of HJR 86,
  • & Any Other Representative You Have a Relationship with.

Talking Points for HJR 86 (Bill Language Below):

  • HJR 86 could stop the state from regulating CAFOs.  HJR 86 includes language stating that “it shall be the right of citizens to raise domesticated animals in a humane manner without the state imposing an undue economic burden on animal owners”.
  • HJR 86 could stop counties from passing health ordinances to protect their citizens from the negative impacts of industrial livestock operations.  HJR 86 includes language that “No law criminalizing or otherwise regulating crops or the welfare of any domesticated animals shall be valid unless based upon generally accepted scientific principles and enacted by the general assembly”.
  • HJR 86 is not simply a new law, but proposes an amendment to the Missouri State Constitution.  This means that any unintended consequences of this language would be cemented into the state constitution and would over-ride any current statute or future action of the state legislature.
  • Representative Loehner should change the language of HJR 86 to clarify the purpose of the bill.  The current language is too broad and creates the possibility of too many far-reaching consequences for independent family farmers, local control and the ability of elected representatives to respond to the citizens of the state.

House Joint Resolution 86:

Article I, Constitution of Missouri, is amended by adding one new section, to be known as section 35, to read as follows:

Section 35. That agriculture which provides food, energy, and security is the foundation and stabilizing force of Missouri’s economy. To protect this vital sector of Missouri’s economy, it shall be the right of citizens to raise domesticated animals in a humane manner without the state imposing an undue economic burden on animal owners. No law criminalizing or otherwise regulating crops or the welfare of any domesticated animals shall be valid unless based upon generally accepted scientific principles and enacted by the general assembly.

Representative Tom Loehner: (573) 751-1344

Representative Steven Tilley: (573) 751-1488

Representative Ron Richard: (573) 751-2173

YOUR REPRESENTATIVE! (Click here for contact info.)

Tom Schweich and Saying Sorry

28 Sunday Feb 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Allen Icet, auditor, Claire McCaskill, Susan Montee, Tom Schweich

The race for Missouri Auditor is typically low-key enough that it can be overlooked. The primary for Missouri Auditor has that same problem, only worse.

For those of you who haven’t heard, the Republican Primary for Auditor is between Allen Icet (Architect of the House Republican Budget) and Tom Schweich (Who flirted with running with the Senate last year). Tom Schweich has a bit of a problem, he donated money to Claire McCaskill. Not in 2006 when she was running for the Senate, but 2001 when she was about to run for re-election as Auditor (McCaskill won re-election in 2002 by one of the larger margins ever, because her Republican opponent was an ex-felon who was ignored by the Republican establishment).

Dave Catanese of Politico has an idea for how Tom Schweich can make Republicans overlook the donation and like him again:

“Schweich should devote a speech to his $500 contrib. to @clairecmc. Say if the GOP wants to b party that excludes indys, it won’t prevail.”

Earlier that night, Catanese passed this on and this about Schweich:

“Bad buzz about Schweich from even those who support him. He’s steamed he has a primary when he cut a deal. Ala Crist, welcome to the NFL.”

“GOPer says Schweich needs to learn from @RoyBlunt in approach. Roy takes his licks, but smiles, brushes off like Jay-Z. Schweich gets mad.”

Now, lets say that the “Schweich handling rejection” (or “Schweich mad that he wasn’t annointed”) thing is true. Then a speech about the Republicans not prevailing without independents could have negligible impact or backfire. You could argue that angry sermons to Republicans only work when the person preaching is not criticizing the Republicans.

Not to mention that the story of a 2001 donation can’t be condensed into a favorable way. Tom Schweich was a Republican when he donated money to McCaskill in 2001 and it’d be a stretch to say that rejecting him would be akin to casting Independents aside. Oh yeah, Schweich’s website features endorsements by Peter Kinder and John Bolton, and notes that Mitt Romney will be headlining a Schweich fundraiser. So that double pivot and twirl from dining with prominent Republicans to claiming appeal to Independents is a tough move to pull in political figure skating.

Sure, if John McCain can claim to be a maverick in 2008, Tom Schweich can claim to be anything in 2010. But there are other problems with the donation.

The Auditors primary is going to be low visibility. The people who are going to be avidly paying attention to this primary are Conservative Republican Activists, Political Nerds, and every once and awhile, the media is going to mention something. The race for Auditor will never get the same enthusiasm as Roy Blunt v. Chuck Purgason v. the 7 Others.

The Republicans who are paying attention to an auditor primary can be tilted by an Icet one-two punch where Icet talks about how he was “fiscally conservative” as a Budget committee chair and he could find ways to make himself seem more authentically Republican than Schweich.

Authenticity. Dave Catanese says that Republicans seek it. But could they be seeking someone who can make them think that he’s an authentic Conservative over someone who has lots of candor?

Dave Catanese also mentioned that Republicans like Claire McCaskill more than they would ever admit. As to how much that’d bounce Claire McCaskill’s approval ratings is unknown. But in the scheme of things Diehard Republicans typically don’t like Democrats enough to vote for them or like them. Social Conservatives and Tea Partiers can find their reasons to claim a dislike of Claire McCaskill, and reminding them that you gave money to Claire McCaskill nine years ago will probably not help your Republican primary bid.

Spurning independent voters is a good way to lose elections. Republicans appear to have their eyes set on winning Independent voters through complete coincidence instead of any special effort. Take the Specter situation, the Charlie Crist situation, and that fact that almost every Republican in DC has an identical voting record on the big issues. If you’re a voter who only dislikes Obama on an issue or two, Republicans hope that you’ll vote for a candidate who dislikes Obama on every major issue.

Could Susan Montee lose re-election? Maybe. If Martha Coakley could lose to Scott Brown, anything is possible. Will Susan Montee run ahead of the average Democrat? Probably. Will Susan Montee run ahead of Robin Carnahan? Maybe. Do Republicans have such a need to win back the Auditor’s office that they’d do something other than picking the candidate more like them ideologically to carry that torch? Nope.

If you forced me to start gambling on elections, i’d put my money on Allen Icet right now. The donation isn’t the only reason. Allen Icet also has a more obvious geographic stronghold (West County). He should have statewide connections. He can make the case that he’s really fiscally conservative (so much so that his budget committee passed a budget cutting meals on wheels). Allen Icet is a good bet, even if Tom Schweich had never made a donation to Claire McCaskill.

But somethings are hard to get over, no matter much candor you show. Sometimes candor can help you out. Sometimes candor is like running towards the Bulls in Pamplona.

I’ll keep my eyes on the Auditor primary. We might see some actual news coming out of this one.

Chain down the loose cannons.

28 Sunday Feb 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 3 Comments

Claire and I disagree about the necessity of even having our forces in Afghanistan, but we can agree on what she has to say here about Blackwater. At the beginning, she cushions the criticism to come, but when she gets down to the problem of lack of accountability for Blackwater operatives, she is right on and straight up.

Afghanistan has cost you and me about $256 billion so far, and part of that high cost is that we’re paying top dollar to an organization that doesn’t chain down its loose cannons.

Pass. The. Damn. Bill.

28 Sunday Feb 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

If I was not a lifelong Democrat used to defeat being snatched from the jaws of victory, I might be tempted to start stretching for a victory lap about now, but I am not a political neophyte, but a veteran of a gazillion disappointments and heartbreaks. It’s tempting, though, because the momentum seems to be shifting toward passage of healthcare reform.  

But I am a war-weary political veteran who doesn’t know how to stop fighting, so I keep coming back for another battle, and I suppose I will continue that MO since the fuckers haven’t killed me yet. I’ve wanted to reform the system since I started working in it in the 80s and the first bricks started falling, signaling that before long, the system was going to be coming down around my ears.

Is the Senate legislation anywhere near the system we would have if I was designing it? Oh hell no. If I was doing the overhaul, I would give us a British-style National Health Service, and the healthcare workers would be eligible for the same sort of generous retirement after twenty years that the military gets, because it wrecks your body. (Yoo Hoo over here. Exhibit A is my right knee, with a rebuilt patellar tendon, a reconstructed ACL, degenerative joint disease, severe osteoarthritis, no miniscus, total surgeries: five. Exhibit B is my left knee, with an ACL that has been reconstructed twice, first a hamstring graft then after I shredded that one coming off a chopper, it was replaced with fiberglass. It’s also been opened up twice to clean up miniscus tears, back when I had some, and it, too has DJD and severe oseoarthritis. Total surgeries: four)

But no one is asking me how we ought to do it, and no one in this country other than the small number of people who deliver and consume military and VA medical services would agree with it anyway. That’s because I really would initiate a government takeover of health care. A real one. That is because I know something about healthcare and I have worked in every phase of the system, public, private and DoD/VA. The DoD and the VA are excellent, and in some areas of the country, cities have done such a fabulous job with public health that everyone gets care The systems in Kansas City and San Francisco come to mind. 2005 was a good year for public health – both San Francisco County and City (they have combined operations) and Kansas City/Jackson County, Missouri put it to their voters and funded health levys, and used the money to deliver universal care to their citizens who don’t have insurance. Neither sell insurance policies to their citizens, they just deliver healthcare via robust, efficient public health systems that serve everyone who needs care – and do so by focusing on wellness and keeping the people they care for healthy – which costs less money than high-dollar sick care. Continuing down that path, when someone does get sick, getting them in to see a doctor and make sure they are properly treated assures a lower expense than the same person getting sicker and sicker and sicker, until finally they end up in the ER, where most of the time we just treat ’em and street ’em, most don’t get admitted, unless they are on death’s door.

Failure to pass the Senate bill and improve it later would be the most vivid example of ‘letting the perfect be the enemy of the good’ that we have seen in the modern era.

At the end of the day, I am a realist. I am the person who will use a tampon to stop a gunshot victim from bleeding out, not because I was taught that trick in training, but because there was a kid bleeding to death in front of my eyes and I had one in my pocket and nothing to lose by trying.

I think, realistically, the Senate bill is the best we can do. And setting aside the fact that the Senate needs a serious fucking overhaul, the best we can do is the best we can do. Get the job done. We have been toiling at it longer than I have been on this planet, and even though one of my Grandmothers was nearly 65 when I was born, she had me for several years before she had a Medicare card.

We aren’t going to get a better deal for a decade at least – and anyone who thinks that if we pass on this and let it get worse still, it will get bad enough that you will get that perfect single-payer system…I think you are out of touch with reality to even think about aligning yourself with Jim DeMint and the like, who simply want to see the President fail. I really don’t understand those who want a primary challenger that would simply result in a repeat of 1980 and the trouncing Teddy Kennedy handed Ronald Reagan over Jimmy Carter. If you want President Palin, you do that. (And it’s 1938 again.)

I figured that Kevin and Steve were pretty good company to be in anyway, so I never had second-guessed my “pass. the. damned. bill.” position.

Now a whole bunch more people are saying it, too – and they ain’t bloggers. They are the sort of heavyweight experts who, in a time of sane discourse, would hold sway.

Obviously, not all economists are in favor of the current proposals in Congress. But a pretty impressive list of health economists and other policy experts has released a letter making the following argument:

We commend the President’s pursuit of bipartisan solutions. Yet the summit made plain that it is now time to move decisively and quickly to enact comprehensive reform. We believe that the only workable process at this point is to use the President’s proposal to finish the job. After long debate, the House and Senate have passed two similar bills that do crucial things to improve U.S. health care.

The signers include Daniel Kahneman, the Nobel laureate and behavioral economist; David Cutler and Len Nichols, who have advised Congress on health policy over the last year; Theda Skocpol, the political scientist; Henry Aaron of the Brookings Institution; and Paul Starr, author of a Pulitzer Prize-winning history of medical care.

Just do it. Pass it now and perfect it later. Remember that the strong programs that we all know and love now, like Social Security and Medicare didn’t start out the strong programs they are now. They were passed, and they were improved on. There is no reason to believe that healthcare reform would be any different.

Remember, Remember the 24th of December

28 Sunday Feb 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

(apologies in advance to the old British childrens rhyme about Guy Faux Day)

Remember, remember the 24th of December

Durbin whipped ’til sixty he got

But the holiday season

Gave the public ample reason

That whipping sixty was quickly forgot.

I am really sick of hearing the bullshit line that if Democrats use reconciliation to pass healthcare, it is akin to tyranny and besides it was never meant for things as big as healthcare, it was only intended for budget fixes.

And the White House and Democrats are pushing back in a fact-based manner.

What a mugs game. You end up with crap like this in the so-called “paper of record.”

Seeing no prospect of a bipartisan agreement on health care, Congressional Democrats said Friday that they would make another effort to pass sweeping health care legislation on their own.

[…]

White House officials and their allies in liberal advocacy groups are making an all-out push to persuade Congress and the public that budget reconciliation is a legitimate procedure used often in the last 30 years to pass major legislation, including President Ronald Reagan’s domestic agenda in 1981, an overhaul of welfare programs in 1996 and President George W. Bush’s tax cuts in 2001 and 2003.

Senator Charles E. Grassley of Iowa, the senior Republican on the Finance Committee, said he knew those precedents. But, he said, they amount to “peanuts compared with this total restructuring of one-sixth of the economy.”

Ummm…What?

Healthcare reform already passed in the Senate. With 60 votes.

Remember that? The republicans bitching that they were going to miss the Holidays at home with their families if the mean old Democrats wouldn’t let them kill healthcare reform.

You know how the republicans whine about the ‘Cornhusker Kickback’ and the ‘Louisiana Purchase’? Yeah, those two things were part of getting sixty votes.

We have two healthcare bills passed. One was passed by the House and the Senate could pass it. That won’t happen, it is too liberal for the conservative-leaning Senate, and there are things in it that could not be passed via reconciliation, so even though it’s a better bill (even with the odious Stupak language), has a public option and covers more people. So scratch that.

But the Senate passed a bill, too. All the House has to do is pass the fucking thing. The reconciliation process would then be used…for smaller budget fixes as it was intended. Like removing the bribes to Landrieu and Nelson.

This is not complicated or hard to grasp at all. But our feckless M$M is worthless and totally (willfully) missing the fact that healthcare reform has already passed. When Chuck Todd and Chris Matthews get it, it has to be a graspable idea, for fucks sake, cause those two, bless their pea-pickin’ hearts, are far from the sharpest knives in the butcher block.

Using reconciliation would not be unusual or out of the ordinary at all if used to fix budget issues in the bill…say it with me now…the bill has already overcome a republican filibuster and passed.

Lack of action on health care leaves unconscionable body count of 68 deaths per day

28 Sunday Feb 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

deaths, ER, health care, Melanie Shouse, primary care, reform

A report released Thursday entitled, “Lives on the Line: The Deadly Cost of Delaying Health Reform,” sheds light on the real moral issue at the heart of America’s national debate on health care: people needlessly dying because they don’t have access to preventive or primary medical care.

At a current rate of 68 deaths each and every day, the Families USA report cautions that without immediate action on health care reform, the body count will grow to a shocking 84 people a day in 2019: this is over 30,000 dead each year; a far more conservative estimate than the well-known Harvard study claiming 45,000 unnecessary deaths are happening each year.

Bottom line: not only are we facing an economic emergency in regard to our need for health care reform, but with this level of inhumanity and carnage associated with the status quo, for political actors to not face this head-on shows a certain moral depravity and unwillingness to break out of a political death spiral. As Republicans dissembled at the summit, they continued on their way down.    

What every other Western democracy has succeeded at delivering to their citizens, Big Insurance, Big Pharma and Big Money have prevented here at home. Who cares if people die, as long as the bottom line and our contractual performance clauses are sated? Unfortunatly, only in America.

But I’ll make the argument that this is simply un-American. The blessings of modernity and medical science are not solely reserved for the wealthy, nor would the 18th century enlightenment principles that birthed our nation sanctify the presence of a mighty multi-national conglomerate divvying out life or death dictates strictly based on profits and compensation.

What depths have we let our peculiar fascination with market populism drive us to?  

Even the vaunted Adam Smith, heralded as the ideological champion of “free markets” by Republicans, historians, and economists, had doubts about the moral capacity of corporate behavior; especially when incentives for “hurtfulness” were designed into the system.

Nick Robins’ book on the world’s first transnational, “The Corporation That Changed The World”, exposes a side of Adam Smith conveniently left out of most free-market ‘invisible hand’ evangel.

“In Smith’s opinion, the joint stock corporation was a deeply flawed piece of public policy. A particular danger was the impetus for hazardous speculation created by separation of ownership and management in the joint stock arrangement… As a result, ‘negligence and profusion must always prevail, more or less, in the management of the affairs of such a company’, simply becoming a vehicle for even more ..’malversion’.”

I think ‘malversion’ aptly describes the perverted and distorted form of the healing profession’s ethical mandate ‘to do no harm’, bent out of shape by moral zigzagging through corporate-profit minefield with a body count in the health insurance industry’s wake.

Another landmine exploded when we lost activist Melanie Shouse to the callous nature of an elitist for-profit health care system.

There is a thing called psychological numbing, which is a mental defense mechanism used to prevent psychological trauma. Denial.

People against health care choose to ignore these casualties on their face. Republicans offering deals that add a paltry 2 million to the health care rolls when 50 million are missing, are choosing to look the other way.

They are the priest and the Levite that pass by the beaten and robbed traveler.

As wiki says,

“A well-recognized situation of psychological numbing is that associated with killing another person. By being numb, the person refuses to recognize the implications of having killed the person, allowing their psyche, as it existed before, to continue as it was.”

We need to pass health care reform to save lives.

In the coming weeks, Congress will be transformed into a giant ER with tens of thousands of future victims lives hanging in the balance. It’s time to stop the talking points about ‘socialism’ and ‘government takeovers’ and face the fact that the unregulated private sector and free market profiteers, wallowing in monopolies and anti-trust, have enormously failed the American people.

What do we want? Health care.

When do we want it? Now.    

Liz Lauber’s Delusions of Grandeur

28 Sunday Feb 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Liz Lauber, missouri, Primary challenges, republicans, Tea Partiers, tea party, Todd Akin

I am sure that I am not the only person who is puzzled by Tea Partier Liz Lauber’s primary challenge against Todd Akin, who is, after all, ranked by the National Journal as the 11th most conservative member of the House of Representatives. Makes you wonder what Lauber is really all about.

Well wonder no more. According to an article in the rightwing rag, The Washington Times, Lauber decided to run for Congress after her representative voted for the TARP bailout.  Of course, she is either confused or her representative at the time was someone other than Akin, since he was one of the Republicans to vote against the bailout. Hasn’t stopped her from giving him a primary challenge though.

Lauber is, it seems, anxious that nobody regard her candidacy as simply an exercise in anti-government bile. She is at pains to show that she wants “not just to stand against government, but to stand for something.”  To that end she and fellow Tea Partier, Phil Troyer, who is running for office in Indiana, have decided to copy Newt Gringrich and present voters with a Tea Party flavored Compact with America, the principles of which are about what one would expect:

-Passing real tax reform, such as a flat tax or fair tax.

-Requiring a vote of Congress to approve each federal agency regulation.

.-Banning earmark recipients from making campaign donations

-Prohibiting federal ownership interests in private companies.

-Requiring bills to be posted online five days in advance of a vote.

-Performing a federalism and constitutionality analysis of all bills.

-Voting for appropriations bills that reduce spending by at least 5 percent.

-Prohibiting federal funding of abortion.

-Offering a constitutional amendment for term limits.

All Mostly questionable provisions that should be very popular with Tea Party zealots – and nothing that Todd Akin would have a problem signing onto, with the exception of the term limits requirement. So the question remains, why would fringers in the 2nd district vote for Liz Lauber? Anti-government bile?

Update – having 2nd thoughts: As I look at the “compact” again, it strikes me that the third provision above – banning earmark recipients from making campaign donations – might be the source of difference between Lauber and Akin. Could it be that a group, initiated by astroturfers to fight health care reform and rational energy policy, has actually taken on its own life – apart from serving as an outlet for every variety of right-wing battiness, that is?  In spite of their silly rhetoric and “constitutional” craziness, do they actually get it when it comes to corruption?  If so, it could be really bad news for the Republicans who hope to march to victory in the Tea Party parade.

Best healthcare in the world?

28 Sunday Feb 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

During Thursday’s get-together to discuss healthcare at Blair House – and yes, I deserve a medal or something, because I watched the whole damned thing except about an hour of the afternoon session that I dozed off and slept through – I kept hearing republicans refer to the American healthcare system as ‘the best healthcare in the world’ and that is simply not true.

We have tiny little islands of excellence, but we also have huge abyss-like pools of deprivation and indifference. We have the best care anywhere…if you are rich, well-insured, or already have healthcare provided by the government. But if you are one of the millions of uninsured or underinsured, or who risk losing their healthcare because of a tenuous job situation, or if you are simply priced out of the market because you are self-employed or employed by a small business that can no longer afford to provide insurance – well, those little islands of excellence are a long ways away and you are in a leaking boat.

Best healthcare in the world? Hardly. We’re number 37.  (That link goes to the New England Journal of Medicine, here is the youtube video.)

This is where it is important to remember that health care is one thing – but it comes to us via a system that is utterly and completely fucked up, and that 48 million Americans have no access to until they are so sick they end up in an emergency room, where the care is the most expensive and the least efficient, and if a patient isn’t sick enough to be admitted, they end up discharged with an appointment they can’t afford to keep and a prescription they can’t afford to fill.

Now I know that the plural of anecdote isn’t data, but first-hand accounts are often the most telling, most moving, best examples.  So if you know someone who works in healthcare ask them if they know of anyone who has been forced to quit a job and get a divorce to get a sick kid on Medicaid. We all know of at least two or three cases. Usually it is a patient, but sometimes it is a coworker. Years ago – I think it was in Wichita but it all runs together when you move every two years for a few decades so I can’t be 100% sure – I worked with a nurse who had a baby with a heart defect. Her son used up all of his insurance benefits from both her policy at work and her husbands. For him to get coverage after his transplant rejection drugs benefit maxed out, she and her husband divorced and she quit her job so he would qualify for medicaid. I have also known a lot of military nurses, lab scientists and other allied health professionals who joined the medical officers corps to get healthcare coverage.

Hell, it kept us in!

Every time it came time to decide “do we stay or do we go?” we stayed – because after that second hitch, you can see the end of twenty and a defined pension and lifetime healthcare. That was a key consideration before it sucked this bad out there!

And if I did not have this benefit now, my life would be a hell of a lot more complicated and less pleasant. For one thing, I would probably have to take a hell of a lot more medication and risk all the side effects that entails. I take narcotics every day – specifically, I take thirty mg. of Oxycontin, and that would be enough to foster an addiction if taken improperly and carries a dependence risk when taken properly. I also take 200 mg. of Celebrex and 5mg. of Cyclobenzaprine. If I still spent ten hours a night running units to the ER  and working traumas and ICU transfusions, and occasionally having to fight for my life with a desperate or psychotic patient, I would certainly have to take higher doses of at least two of the three drugs that are – so far – successful in the attempt to get me on the other side of fifty before I have to have bilateral knee replacements.

Because I have healthcare, I had the option to make a decision three years ago to quit working a regular schedule and instead do some other important things like raise my granddaughter to school age while I keep the classic all original equipment for a few more years.  

Because I have healthcare, I have been able to carve out a little niche for myself editing, writing, researching, that sort of thing. It required other concessions on my part, and some of my friends in the burbs shook their head at the choices I started making about four years ago that ended with me cashing in my chips three years ago and withdrawing from the ratrace (problem is, even if you win, you’re still a rat) but every last one of them went from confused to jealous as soon as I reminded them that I don’t have to worry about my healthcare access disappearing with my full-time job.

A single-payer system, or even a strong public option that truly small businesses could rely on, would free up so much creativity and small business investment and economic stimulation in this country that we would have the closest thing to full employment you can have and not have runaway inflation.

In my former line of work, I met a lot of firemen and cops, and a huge number of them own bars – at one time I thought it was in the KCFD union contract that when you became a Lieutenant you were issued one, but a friend who is a fire Captain and on his third bar, each one nicer than the last, disabused me of that notion a few years ago, so I gave up trying to get a KCFD gig…

I worked with all sorts of entrepreneurs who used the time a hospital or public service schedule affords to do other things. I worked with two women in one hospital who made boutique soaps and sold them online and at local arts fairs and in specialty shops and natural foods stores. I knew a guy in environmental services who had a fish business – he rented fish tanks to professinal offices and used his days off at the hospital to service the tanks and deliver fish food to the offices. I knew a lab scientist who owned and operated a science store. A young friend – I trained her to stick needles in living flesh – now sticks more needles in fabric. She is a fabulous dressmaker and makes a lot of money doing it, but not enough to quit her job and still have healthcare, even though she turns down enough work to work full time and hire an assistant.

Ask any one of those people and they would tell you that they would pursue the successful businesses they have passion for full time, invest in them and hire employees…if they weren’t tied to their jobs in order to keep their health care.

I’ve told you before about the second job I had for a few years when we landed here – I worked for a friend in a blues bar and wrote for the Blues News before I got political – my politics were never addressed when we were in the military, they were no ones damned business. Anyway, working there is how I originally got to know Mike Finnegan – hell, I was pleasantly surprised – and delighted – to find out that MY Mike Finnegan and the blog roundup guy at Crooks & Liars were the same guy!  

There is one big – huge, actually – difference though, between writing about politics and wars and national security and stuff and reviewing performances and recordings. Back then, I got calls from agents and artists every day, begging me to please go see this band or they wanted to send me that CD – Boy, did I have a lot of long-lost friends and relatives when I could just walk past any doorman in town because my name was always on the guest list or I could walk through the stagehands and bands entrance to Sandstone for Aerosmith or the Anger Management Tour or the Beastie Boys or Oz Fest and watch from the side of the stage – Here’s the bottom line – if you are backstage for B.B. King, Little Milton, KoKo Taylor or Bonnie Raitt – or you are in charge of the beer tent at a three-day music festival – your friends fight over who gets to to tag along with you to work.

Not so much when they have to spend six hours on a train to Jeff City and back to watch the idjits in the state lege prove that we’re in the running with South Carolina and Texas for batshit-craziest state legislature – Yellow Dog done conceded Kentucky can’t compete with us folks ‘crost the big river earlier this week, so it’s down to three –  and it not only costs them fifty bucks for the train ticket, there’s no free booze in the green room, and they don’t get a free tee-shirt or to make out with a bass player (til the next time they order a pizza.)

But it’s still good work if you can get it, and don’t have to worry about health care.  

Ike Skelton – et tu Brute?

27 Saturday Feb 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Claire McCaskill, CO2 emissions, EPA, EPA regulations, Ike Skelton, missouri, pollution

When I learned via Prime Buzz that Ike Skelton and Minnesota’s Collin Peterson have introduced legislation that would “veto the EPA’s finding in December that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare,” I was not really as surprised as Caesar was by Brutus’ nasty knife in the back. Just another Missouri Democrat out to establish his credentials as a running dog for big coal – first Claire McCaskill, and now the ever-predictable Mr. Skelton. Nevertheless, I did wonder if he couldn’t have just waited and voted on some other jerk’s bad legislation? Did he have to initiate?

The real eyeopener, though, can be found in the comments on the Prime Buzz article. One blighted-in-the-bud intellect declares that no matter what Skelton does, the voters of his district will never regard him as anything other than “just another Pelosi lackey.” Too bad nobody told Pelosi – she could surely have made much better use of Skelton had she known that he is just another one of her lackeys. Of course, on the other hand, some of us are more concerned about Peabody Coal’s lackeys than Pelosi’s.

HASSLER to PHILLIPS Connect-the-Dots Game!

27 Saturday Feb 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

If, dear reader, you feel misinformed regarding the facts of the Benoit Wesly affair, boggled by Podolefsky non-renewal or troubled by the burgeoning boondoggle that threatens the search for the next UCM President, you are most certainly not alone.

It has been suggested that certain individuals within the university community share a common interest and have unduly influenced the recent actions and, indeed, the very composition of the UCM Board of Governors.

We set out to see if there could be any truth to this notion and should report that, at this point, the results are inconclusive.

However, through the course of research, an interesting group of individuals emerged; a group that neatly fell into a line that traced a path from UCM Non-Employee Greg Hassler, directly to UCM Board of Governors President Dick Phillips.

Is this series of relationships meaningful or mere coincidence? You be the judge… 

 

Greg Hassler

Part-Owner (one of four initial members) of D & H Media, LLC

AM radio attacker of Ronnie Podolefsky and Aaron Podolefsky

An obvious and unequivical Non-Employee of the University of Central Missouri

Married to Carol Hassler

On-Air Personality for the Central Sports Radio Network



After the jump, we Connect the Dots!

 

 

Shawn Jones



UCM
Associate Athletics Director, External Operations whose duties include the “…awarding of broadcast rights…”

Affilliate Relations Director/Sales Director for the University of Central Missouri Sports Network

The Voice of the Central Sports Radio Network

Host of the KMOS-TV program Sportspage, the producer of which, the aptly named Mr. James Sales, is concurrently employed by KOKO radio

Organizer of the UCM Athletics Auction which, in Shawn’s estimation, has “…has netted $750,000 for UCM Athletics in its eight year history*

*At the 2009 festivities, one could bid in hopes of winning one of five items offered by the single most generous donors of auction items, Ed and Kathy Baker.

For example, last year, some lucky bidder was tempted by this scintillating evening…

Catalog#: 32

Dinner for Eight on October 2, 2009

Enjoy a wonderful dinner at the home of Jerry and Vici Hughes, on Friday evening October 2, 2009.

Dinner for eight will be prepared by the Executive Chef of Churchill’s Restaurant in Columbia.

You will be served by the professional staff of Churchill’s.

You and your friends will be joined for dinner by UCM Board of Governors member Ed Baker and his wife Kathy,

UCM Athletic Director Jerry Hughes and his wife Vici, and Coach Kim and Melissa Anderson.

Cocktail hour begins at 6pm. Enjoy good company and great food.

Courtesy of: Ed & Kathy Baker

As chilling as that event sounds, we morbidly digress…

So, to whom did Shawn award the rights to broadcast UCM Sports?


Carol Hassler

Part-Owner (one of four initial members) of D & H Media, LLC

Married to Greg Hassler

Board of Directors of the UCM Alumni Association

As it happens, Carol sits on the Alumni Board with…


John Culp

Board of Directors of the UCM Alumni Association

UCM Athletics Program Development & Retention Coodinator

What Culp’s professional responsibilities actually entail is anyone’s guess, but clearly he develops and retains someone or something on behalf of the UCM Athletic Department.

Alongside Culp in the Athletic Department Staff Directory, one finds a young man with a familiar name…


John Hicklin

UCM Athletics Academic Advisor

Son of UCM Board of Governors member Walter “Walt” Hicklin

John Hicklin and John Culp both report to UCM’s version of  “King Carl Peterson…”


Jerry Hughes

UCM Athletics Director

Infamously NOT the UCM Vice President of University Advancement

Married to Vici Hughes, who was appointed UCM Director of Alumni Relations and Development in 2004, and shown the door, er reassigned, by UCM President Podolefsky in 2006.

← Older posts

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 740,838 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

 

Loading Comments...