• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Category Archives: campaign finance

Campaign Finance: Democracy

19 Friday Jun 2026

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Amendment 4, campaign finance, General Assembly, governor, HJR 3, initiative petition, Mike Kehoe, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, Protect Majority Rule Missouri

Today at the Missouri Ethics Commission in opposition to the restrictive requirements on initiative petitions required by Amendment 4 (HJR 3) on the August ballot::

C253757 06/19/2026 Protect Majority Rule Missouri Missouri Workers Power 438 Skinker Blvd St Louis MO 63130 6/18/2026 $300,000.00

[emphasis added]

The campaign committee:

Protect Majority Rule Missouri – Active
MECID: C253757
PO Box 2187
St. Louis, MO 63158
Committee Type: Campaign
[….]

Supported/Opposed Ballot Measure
Measure Election Date Subject Political Subdivision Support/Oppose
Amendment 4 11/3/2026 Changes to the initiaitve petition process Statewide Oppose

[emphasis added]

No on Amendment 4.

Previously:

About that ‘inconvenient’ redress of grievances thing… (June 5, 2026)

Campaign Finance: but wait, there’s even more (June 5, 2026)

Campaign Finance: way, way in (June 13, 2026)

Campaign Finance: like they need the money

18 Thursday Jun 2026

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

campaign finance, House Republican Campaign Committee, HRCC, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, Rex Sinquefield, right wingnut

Today at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C091068 06/18/2026 House Republican Campaign Committee, Inc Rex Sinquefield 244 Bent Walnut Westphalia MO 65085 N/A Retired 6/17/2026 $250,000.00

[emphasis added]

A pittance. Heh.

Previously:

Campaign Finance: “I, the billionaire” (June 17, 2026)

Campaign Finance: “I, the billionaire”

17 Wednesday Jun 2026

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

campaign finance, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, PAC, Rex Sinquefield, right wingnut, We the People Priorities

6,297,538 people, give or take a few, eh? Yeah, no.

Today at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

264285 06/17/2026 We the People Priorities PAC Rex Sinquefield 224 Bent Walnut Ln Westphalia MO 65085 None Retired 6/17/2026 $300,000.00

[emphasis added]

So, it’s a new one.

We the People Priorities PAC – Active
MECID: C264285
308 East High Street
Suite 300
Jefferson City, MO 65101
Committee Type: Political Action

[….]

05/28/2026 2026

Sigh.

Campaign Finance: keep it coming

12 Friday Jun 2026

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Amendment 4, campaign finance, General Assembly, governor, HJR 3, initiative petition, Mike Kehoe, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, Missourians for Fair Governance

At the Missouri Ethics Commission for the opposition to the restrictive requirements on initiative petitions required by Amendment 4 (HJR 3) on the August ballot:

C232522 06/12/2026 Missourians for Fair Governance Protect Majority Rule Missouri PO Box 2187 St Louis MO 63158 6/12/2026 $343,000.00

[emphasis added]

Governor Mike Kehoe (r) and the right wingnut republican controlled Missouri General Assembly have a plan.

It’s not a good one.

No on Amendment 4.

Previously:

Campaign Finance: but wait, there’s even more (June 5, 2026)

About that ‘inconvenient’ redress of grievances thing… (June 5, 2026)

Campaign Finance: they ain’t playing around (June 8, 2026)

Campaign Finance: “Welcome to the party, pal”

12 Friday Jun 2026

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Amendment 3, Amendment 4, Amendment 5, campaign finance, General Assembly, gerrymandering, HB 1, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, Protect Freedom and Democracy, Redistricting, referendum

Today at the Missouri Ethics Commission for a campaign committee opposing Amendment 3, Amendment 4, Amendment 5 and redistricting/gerrymandering:

C264301 06/12/2026 Protect Freedom and Democracy Missouri Organizing and Voter Engagement Action 438 N Skinker Saint Louis MO 63130 6/12/2026 $150,000.00

[emphasis added]

Protect Freedom and Democracy – Active
MECID: C264301
620 E Armour Blvd
Kansas City, MO 64109
[….]
Supported/Opposed Ballot Measure
Measure Election Date Subject Political Subdivision Support/Oppose
Amendment 3 11/3/2026 Anti-Abortion Amendment Statewide Oppose
Amendment 4 8/4/2026 Anti-Majority Rule Statewide Oppose
Amendment 5 8/4/2026 Everything Tax Statewide Oppose
HB1 Veto Referendum 11/3/2026 Repeal the congressional redistricting map passed in HB 1 Statewide Oppose

[….]

It’s a new committee:

Welcome to the party.

Campaign Finance: they ain’t playing around

08 Monday Jun 2026

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Amendment 4, campaign finance, General Assembly, governor, HJR 3, initiative petition, Mike Kehoe, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, Missourians for Fair Governance

Today at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C232522 06/08/2026 Missourians for Fair Governance Missouri Association of REALTORS 2801 Woodard Dr Ste 101 Columbia MO 65202 6/8/2026 $2,000,000.00

[emphasis added]

Pretty soon you’re talking about some serious money….

Missourians for Fair Governance – Active
MECID: C232522
Committee Type: Campaign
100 E High St Floor 1
Jefferson City, MO 65101
[….]
Supported/Opposed Ballot Measure
Measure Election Date Subject Political Subdivision Support/Oppose
Unknown at this time 8/6/2024 To protect Missourians’ power of the petition for citizen governance Statewide Support
– Oppose HJR3 11/3/2026 Initiative from the legislature to make constitutional changes to the initiative petition process. Statewide Oppose
[….]

[emphasis added]

Because:

Governor Kehoe Places Four Constitutional Amendments on August Primary Election Ballot
May 22, 2026

[….]

….Amendment 4 – if approved by voters, modifies current requirements that a simple statewide majority of voters may approve initiative petitions to amend the constitution, requires a majority of voters in each congressional district to approve initiative petitions to amend the constitution….

No on Amendment 4.

Previously:

Campaign Finance: but wait, there’s even more (June 5, 2026)

About that ‘inconvenient’ redress of grievances thing… (June 5, 2026)

Campaign Finance: but wait, there’s even more

05 Friday Jun 2026

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Amendment 4, campaign finance, General Assembly, governor, HJR 3, initiative petition, Mike Kehoe, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, Protect Majority Rule Missouri

Today at the Missouri Ethics Commission, in opposition to the restrictive requirements on initiative petitions required by Amendment 4 (HJR 3) on the August ballot:

C253757 06/05/2026 Protect Majority Rule Missouri Missouri Jobs with Justice Voter Action 2725 Clifton St Louis MO 63139 6/4/2026 $100,000.00

[emphasis added]

Okay.

[….]
What Is Amendment 4?
Amendment 4 is a measure on Missouri’s August 4, 2026 ballot that would change the rules for citizen-led initiative petitions — the process Missourians have used since 1908 to put laws and constitutional amendments directly on the ballot. Today, those measures pass with a simple statewide majority. Amendment 4 would require a statewide majority plus a majority in EVERY Missouri congressional district.

The catch: politicians exempted themselves. Measures the legislature refers to the ballot still pass with a simple majority. Only initiatives that come from citizens face the higher bar.
[….]

No on Amendment 4.

Previously:

About that ‘inconvenient’ redress of grievances thing… (June 5, 2026)

About that ‘inconvenient’ redress of grievances thing…

05 Friday Jun 2026

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

Amendment 4, campaign finance, General Assembly, governor, HJR 3, initiative petition, Mike Kehoe, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, Protect Majority Rule Missouri

At the Missouri Ethics Commission, in opposition to the restrictive requirements on initiative petitions required by Amendment 4 (HJR 3) on the August ballot:

C253757 06/03/2026 Protect Majority Rule Missouri Health Forward Foundation 2300 Main St, Ste. 301 Kansas City MO 64108 6/1/2026 $300,000.00

[emphasis added]

Protect Majority Rule Missouri – Active
MECID: C253757 Committee Type: Campaign
[….]
Supported/Opposed Ballot Measure
Measure Election Date Subject Political Subdivision Support/Oppose
Amendment 4 11/3/2026 Changes to the initiaitve [sic] petition process Statewide Oppose
[….]

Because:

Governor Kehoe Places Four Constitutional Amendments on August Primary Election Ballot
May 22, 2026

[….]

….Amendment 4 – if approved by voters, modifies current requirements that a simple statewide majority of voters may approve initiative petitions to amend the constitution, requires a majority of voters in each congressional district to approve initiative petitions to amend the constitution….

It’s in that detail.

Vote NO on Missouri Amendments 4, 5 this August
Posted on June 4, 2026

By SHERI GASSAWAY
Missouri Correspondent

Missouri Gov. Mike Kehoe has scheduled a vote on two amendments this August that would be detrimental to the state’s working families, the poor and democracy as a whole.

Amendment 5 would give lawmakers new power to expand sales and use taxes to replace the state’s 4.7 percent income tax, and Amendment 4 would create a higher bar for passage of citizen-led constitutional amendments. The measures will appear on the Aug. 4 primary ballot.

THE MISSOURI AFL-CIO is recommending a “NO” vote on Amendments 4 and 5 on the Aug. 4 ballot. Amendment 5 would grant lawmakers new power to expand sales and use taxes to replace the state’s 4.7 percent income tax, and Amendment 4 would make it more difficult to pass citizen-led constitutional amendments.

[….]

Amendment 4 would require any constitutional amendment placed on the ballot through the citizen-led initiative petition process to pass in all eight of Missouri’s congressional districts. Currently, those amendments need only a statewide majority pass.

“We would in effect, be giving one district veto power over another district,” Hummel said.

The initiative petition process allows citizens to bypass the legislature and propose constitutional amendments directly to voters. It has been used recently to increase the minimum wage and approve paid sick leave, legalize recreational marijuana and to protect abortion rights.

In the last year, the Republican-controlled legislature has overturned the voter-approved paid sick leave initiative and repealed a voter-approved 2024 constitutional amendment protecting abortion rights. Efforts are also underway to weaken the state’s newly passed minimum wage laws.

[….]

“…We would in effect, be giving one district veto power over another district…” Or the majority of the citizens of the state.

[….]
What Is Amendment 4?
Amendment 4 is a measure on Missouri’s August 4, 2026 ballot that would change the rules for citizen-led initiative petitions — the process Missourians have used since 1908 to put laws and constitutional amendments directly on the ballot. Today, those measures pass with a simple statewide majority. Amendment 4 would require a statewide majority plus a majority in EVERY Missouri congressional district.

The catch: politicians exempted themselves. Measures the legislature refers to the ballot still pass with a simple majority. Only initiatives that come from citizens face the higher bar.

[….]

Who Put This On The Ballot?
Politicians, not citizens.
Amendment 4 was referred to the ballot by the Missouri General Assembly. It was not the product of a grassroots petition. The same body that wrote it then exempted itself from its rules — meaning politicians can still pass referred amendments with a simple majority, while citizen-led initiatives must clear the higher bar. That’s not reform. That’s rigging.
[….]

No on Amendment 4.

Campaign Finance: every little bit counts

02 Tuesday Jun 2026

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Amendment 5, class warfare, HJR 173, income tax repeal, Missouri Ethics Commission, Missourians for Fair Taxation, regressive taxation, right wingnut welfare, shift the tax burden, welfare for billionaires and millionaires

By one dollar.

Today at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C121477 06/02/2026 Missourians for Fair Taxation Missouri REALTORS 2801 Woodard Dr Ste 101 Columbia MO 65202 6/2/2026 $1,900,001.00

[emphasis added]

Missouri Realtors are not happy with the right wingnut controlled super majority in the Missouri General Assembly and Governor Mike Kehoe’s (r) scam to abolish the income tax in Missouri and shift revenue to regressive sales taxes.

Welcome to the club.

Missourians for Fair Taxation – Active
MECID: C121477
100 E High St
Floor 1
Jefferson City, MO 65101
[….]
Supported/Opposed Ballot Measure
Measure Election Date Subject Political Subdivision Support/Oppose
Amendment 5 8/4/2026 Oppose the elimination of the state income tax and the creation of a broad-based sales/use tax. Statewide Oppose
[….]

[emphasis added]

They say “$1,900,000.00”, Missouri Realtors say, “Oh yeah, $1,900,001.00”.

Heh. Message sent.

Missouri Realtors pour $1.9 million into campaign to defeat Amendment 5 tax plan
The donation matches the amount a nonprofit gave to the PAC supporting the August ballot measure
By: Jason Hancock
June 2, 2026 3:55 pm

The Missouri Association of Realtors donated $1.9 million to the campaign opposing Amendment 5 on Tuesday, escalating the fight over a proposed constitutional amendment that would create a pathway for lawmakers to eliminate the state income tax through expanded or increased sales taxes.
[….]

Previously:

Campaign Finance: for billionaires and millionaires (May 30, 2026)

Campaign Finance: for billionaires and millionaires

30 Saturday May 2026

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance, Missouri General Assembly, Missouri Governor

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

campaign finance, class warfare, HJR 173, income tax repeal, missouri, Missouri Budget Project, Missouri Ethics Commission, regressive taxation, right wingnut welfare, shift the tax burden, welfare for billionaires and millionaires

Screw everyone else.

At the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C264249 05/28/2026 Missouri Promise PAC Missouri Promise Inc. 701 Market Street Suite 110 St Louis MO 63101 5/27/2026 $1,900,000.00

[emphasis added]

It’s a new PAC:

Where did all that money come from?

What they say:

“A Future Without Income Tax.”

Which will inevitably lead to a future with a regressive tax structure (the poor and middle class pay a higher rate, the wealthy get a windfall) and fewer public services.

Amendment 5 (House Joint Resolution 173 – proposed and passed by the right wingnut controlled republican super majority in the Missouri General Assembly and signed by right wingnut Governor Mike Kehoe) will be on the August ballot.

The result, if this Amendment 5 passes in August, via the Missouri Budget Project:

Amendment 5 Would Increase Taxes for Most Missourians, Damage Communities & Economy
21 May 2026

[….]

Consequences of Amendment 5’s “Everything Tax”
Increased Taxes for Most Missourians; Yet Another Tax Cut for the Wealthiest

• Missouri already has an upside-down tax structure, where Missourians earning the least contribute a higher share of their incomes than Missourians earning the most. Replacing Missouri’s income tax with a greatly expanded sales tax will make this even worse.

• To fill the gap, Missouri’s general revenue sales tax rate would need to more than triple, from the current 3% to 10.7% – resulting in a combined average state and local sales tax rate of 16%.

• Alternatively, lawmakers could expand the sales tax to apply to all of the products and services that Missourians use every day like doctor’s visits and medication, childcare and summer camps, home and car repairs – even gasoline. The measure does not include any exemptions.

• In both cases, a median income Missourian making $65,400 per year would face $535 net tax increase.

• Older adults who rely on Social Security or public pensions and active-duty military members, whose income is largely already exempt from income tax, will have a much steeper tax increase.

Massive Budget Deficits That Trigger Cuts to Education & Other Services That Build Opportunity

• Missouri’s income tax currently generates $8.5 billion/year and supports 64% of the state general revenue budget. There is simply no realistic way to make up the revenue lost from eliminating the income tax.

• Missouri already faces a $2.5 billion budget deficit resulting from a decade of tax reductions that largely benefited the wealthy and corporations; this has already triggered painful cuts to critical services with even more steep cuts likely in the coming years.

• Even if lawmakers expand the existing sales tax to ALL services, the revenue generated would fall far short of making up for the loss of income tax. There is simply no realistic way to replace the income tax without expanded the sales tax to all services AND increasing the rate of sales tax.

Fewer Investments in the Everyday Missourians Whose Contributions and Skills Drive Our Economy

• If tax cuts were the key to economic prosperity, Missouri would already be seeing the benefits. Instead, sustainable economic growth is driven by real improvements in the lives of everyday Missourians.

• Increasing Missouri’s sales tax would dramatically increase daily costs for Missourians and dampen consumer spending in communities across the state.

• Missourians may be tempted to cross state lines or travel to big box stores for many purchases, devastating small local businesses and communities.

• State investments in quality K-12 and higher education, affordable care for children and aging parents, and access to health coverage are key drivers of economic growth and critical components in attracting and retaining a skilled workforce and quality employers.

And:

Judge to decide Monday whether Missouri tax overhaul stays on August ballot
Opponents contend the measure would violate a ban on constitutional amendments including more than one subject. They also argue the ballot summary is misleading and should be changed
By: Rudi Keller
May 29, 2026 1:00 pm

[….]

Backers are using a political action committee called Missouri Promise, which so far has been entirely funded by a nonprofit established in Delaware called Missouri Promise Inc.

On Wednesday, Missouri Promise Inc. donated $1.9 million to the PAC. Spokesman Jonathon Prouty declined to disclose the donors to Missouri Promise Inc. in a statement sent via text to The Independent.

The way the money will be spent “has yet to be determined,” Prouty said, adding that all donations to Missouri Promise PAC “are reported to the Missouri Ethics Commission in accordance with state law.”

[….]

The statement was conveyed via text. It is impossible to determine if it was delivered with a straight face.

“When the people have nothing left to eat they will eat the rich”

Taxation is the price we pay for civilization.

← Older posts

Recent Posts

  • Campaign Finance: Democracy
  • Campaign Finance: like they need the money
  • Choice in Missouri
  • Campaign Finance: “I, the billionaire”
  • Current status

Recent Comments

Steve Duane Phipps on No Kings – Warrensburg,…
No Kings – War… on Warrensburg, Missouri – No Kin…
Campaign Finance: pr… on Campaign Finance: for billiona…
Campaign Finance: wa… on About that ‘inconvenient…
Campaign Finance: ke… on About that ‘inconvenient…

Archives

  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,052,682 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...