• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Tag Archives: PAC

Campaign Finance: Will of the People – Missouri

06 Tuesday Oct 2026

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

campaign finance, legislator rating, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, PAC, Will of the People

Today at the Missouri Ethics Commission for a progressive PAC:

253517 10/06/2026 Will of the People Missouri Voter Project – State PAC 714 Locust Street St Louis MO 63101 10/6/2026 $250,000.00

[emphasis added]

Will of the People.

They have money to spend.

GOTV? Probably.

They do legislator ratings.

Brandon Phelps (r) [2025 file photo].

Brandon Phelps (r), incumbent in the 54th Legislative District:

Brandon Phelps
Republican·House District 54

Incumbent·Current House member

Voted to uphold the will of the people on 0 of 5 scored votes.

F 0% WOTP Score

HB 1 · Sept 2025, 2nd Extraordinary Session

Proposition A: Politicians’ congressional gerrymander
Asks voters to accept a DC-politician-drawn congressional map outside the normal redistricting calendar.

Official House roll call (PDF)
YEA
HJR 73 · May 2025, Regular Session

Amendment 3: Abortion ban
Asks voters to overturn a 2024 voter-approved measure which protected access to abortion care.

Official House roll call (PDF)
YEA
HB 567 · May 2025, Regular Session

Earned paid sick leave repeal
Repealed guaranteed earned paid sick leave for Missouri workers and rolled back minimum wage provisions voters approved in November 2024.

Official House roll call (PDF)
YEA
HJR 3 · Sept 2025, 2nd Extraordinary Session

Amendment 4: Making it nearly impossible to pass ballot measures
Asked voters to give up our power and end majority rule for citizen-initiated ballot measures, making it nearly impossible to pass anything at the ballot.

Official House roll call (PDF)
YEA
HJR 173 · April 2026, Regular Session

Amendment 5: Sales tax increase
Asked voters to allow the Missouri Legislature to raise sales taxes on everything we buy so they can eliminate income taxes to benefit their wealthy donors.

Official House roll call (PDF)
YEA

Yeah, no surprises there.

Campaign Finance: offered without further comment

04 Sunday Oct 2026

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

campaign finance, irony challenged, just passing through, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, PAC, Rex Sinquefield

Yesterday at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C171236 10/03/2026 Missourians for a Responsible Budget Rex Sinquefield 244 Bent Walnut Westphalia MO 65085 Retired 10/2/2026 $50,000.00

[emphasis added]

Earlier in the year:

C171236 04/01/2026 Missourians for a Responsible Budget Rex Sinquefield 244 Bent Walnut Westphalia MO 65085 Retired 3/31/2026 $100,000.00

C171236 07/15/2026 Missourians for a Responsible Budget Rex Sinquefield 244 Bent Walnut Westphalia MO 65085 Retired 7/15/2026 $100,000.00

[emphasis added]

In April:

“Yes” on 6, “No” on the rest

02 Friday Oct 2026

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Amendment 6, campaign finance, Constitution, Constitutional amendment, initiative, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, PAC

Today at the Missouri Ethics Commission in support of the initiative to preserve and expand Missouri voters’ voices:

C264382 10/02/2026 Vote Yes on Amendment 6 Americans for Fairness 6170 Joliet Rd, Suite 200 Countryside IL 60525 10/1/2026 $250,000.00

C264382 10/02/2026 Vote Yes on Amendment 6 Respect MO Voters Campaign PO Box 901802 Kansas City MO 64190 10/1/2026 $50,000.00

[emphasis added]

On the November ballot:

Amendment 6

[….]

Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to:

– expand the initiative and referendum petition process by making it a fundamental right;
– allow courts to revise ballot summaries through lawsuits;
– prohibit the legislature from weakening initiative or referendum powers;
– prohibit the legislature from changing or repealing laws enacted through the initiative process, or passing laws similar to those rejected by referendum, – without approval from at least 80% of both chambers; and
– preserve existing majority vote and signature requirements for initiative and referendum petitions?

State and local governmental entities estimate no costs or savings.

Fair Ballot Language:

A “yes” vote will prohibit the people’s elected representatives from directly amending or changing any law enacted through the initiative process; require that any modifications to laws enacted through the initiative process be referred to the people by a vote of at least 80% of each chamber of the General Assembly; restrict the legislature from passing laws that limit the ability to pursue initiatives and referenda; maintain the current signature requirements of five percent of the individual legal voters in each of two-thirds of Missouri’s congressional districts for proposing a law; maintain the current signature requirement of eight percent of individual legal voters in each of two-thirds of Missouri’s congressional districts for proposing a constitutional amendment; and maintain the current requirement that a simple statewide majority of votes cast on a measure by individual legal voters is sufficient to enact any law or constitutional amendment.

[….]

It is a plan.

Vote ‘Yes’ on Amendment 6.

Previously:

Campaign Finance: off to the races (September 12, 2026)

Campaign Finance: off to the races – part 2 (September 14, 2026)

Campaign Finance: off to the races – part 3 (September 15, 2026)

Campaign Finance: off to the races – part 4 (September 17, 2026)

Campaign Finance: off to the races – part 5 (September 18, 2026)

Campaign Finance: off to the races – part 6 (September 18, 2026)

Campaign Finance: …but it dies, inexorably, large check by large check

26 Saturday Sep 2026

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance, Missouri General Assembly, Missouri House

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

101st Legislative District, Ben Keathley, campaign finance, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, PAC, Rex Sinquefield

Today at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C232449 09/26/2026 Freedom Is Bold PAC Rex Sinquefield 244 Bent Walnut Lane Westphalia MO 65085 investor 9/26/2026 $15,000.00

[emphasis added]

Sadly, large check by large check.

Campaign Finance: off to the races – part 7

20 Sunday Sep 2026

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Amendment 6, campaign finance, Constitution, Constitutional amendment, initiative, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, PAC, referendum

Today at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C264382 09/20/2026 Vote Yes on Amendment 6 Preserve Middle Class America, Inc 1850 East Division Street Springfield MO 65803 9/18/2026 $225,000.00

[emphasis added]

On the November ballot:

Amendment 6

[….]

Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to:

– expand the initiative and referendum petition process by making it a fundamental right;
– allow courts to revise ballot summaries through lawsuits;
– prohibit the legislature from weakening initiative or referendum powers;
– prohibit the legislature from changing or repealing laws enacted through the initiative process, or passing laws similar to those rejected by referendum, – without approval from at least 80% of both chambers; and
– preserve existing majority vote and signature requirements for initiative and referendum petitions?

State and local governmental entities estimate no costs or savings.

Fair Ballot Language:

A “yes” vote will prohibit the people’s elected representatives from directly amending or changing any law enacted through the initiative process; require that any modifications to laws enacted through the initiative process be referred to the people by a vote of at least 80% of each chamber of the General Assembly; restrict the legislature from passing laws that limit the ability to pursue initiatives and referenda; maintain the current signature requirements of five percent of the individual legal voters in each of two-thirds of Missouri’s congressional districts for proposing a law; maintain the current signature requirement of eight percent of individual legal voters in each of two-thirds of Missouri’s congressional districts for proposing a constitutional amendment; and maintain the current requirement that a simple statewide majority of votes cast on a measure by individual legal voters is sufficient to enact any law or constitutional amendment.

[….]

It is a plan.

Yes on Amendment 6:

Previously:

Campaign Finance: off to the races (September 12, 2026)

Campaign Finance: off to the races – part 2 (September 14, 2026)

Campaign Finance: off to the races – part 3 (September 15, 2026)

Campaign Finance: off to the races – part 4 (September 17, 2026)

Campaign Finance: off to the races – part 5 (September 18, 2026)

Campaign Finance: off to the races – part 6 (September 18, 2026)

Campaign Finance: off to the races – part 6

18 Friday Sep 2026

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Amendment 6, campaign finance, Constitution, Constitutional amendment, initiative, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, PAC, We Are Missouri

Today at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C264382 09/18/2026 Vote Yes on Amendment 6 We Are Missouri 131 E. High St Jefferson City MO 65101 9/18/2026 $100,000.00

[emphasis added]

On the November ballot:

Amendment 6

[….]

Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to:

– expand the initiative and referendum petition process by making it a fundamental right;
– allow courts to revise ballot summaries through lawsuits;
– prohibit the legislature from weakening initiative or referendum powers;
– prohibit the legislature from changing or repealing laws enacted through the initiative process, or passing laws similar to those rejected by referendum, – without approval from at least 80% of both chambers; and
– preserve existing majority vote and signature requirements for initiative and referendum petitions?

State and local governmental entities estimate no costs or savings.

Fair Ballot Language:

A “yes” vote will prohibit the people’s elected representatives from directly amending or changing any law enacted through the initiative process; require that any modifications to laws enacted through the initiative process be referred to the people by a vote of at least 80% of each chamber of the General Assembly; restrict the legislature from passing laws that limit the ability to pursue initiatives and referenda; maintain the current signature requirements of five percent of the individual legal voters in each of two-thirds of Missouri’s congressional districts for proposing a law; maintain the current signature requirement of eight percent of individual legal voters in each of two-thirds of Missouri’s congressional districts for proposing a constitutional amendment; and maintain the current requirement that a simple statewide majority of votes cast on a measure by individual legal voters is sufficient to enact any law or constitutional amendment.

[….]

It is a plan.

We Are Missouri.

We Are Missouri – Active
MECID: C253728
131 E. High Street
Jefferson City, MO 65101
[….]
Committee Type: Political Action
[….]

Previously:

Campaign Finance: off to the races (September 12, 2026)

Campaign Finance: off to the races – part 2 (September 14, 2026)

Campaign Finance: off to the races – part 3 (September 15, 2026)

Campaign Finance: off to the races – part 4 (September 17, 2026)

Campaign Finance: off to the races – part 5 (September 18, 2026)

Campaign Finance: one million

11 Tuesday Aug 2026

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

campaign finance, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, PAC, Will of the People

Today at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C253517 08/11/2026 Will of the People Missouri Voter Project – State PAC 347 Hazel Ave Webster Groves MO 63119 8/10/2026 $125,000.00

C253517 08/11/2026 Will of the People Missouri Jobs with Justice Voter Action 2725 Clifton Ave St Louis MO 63139 8/10/2026 $500,000.00

C253517 08/11/2026 Will of the People Missouri Workers Power 438 N Skinker Blvd St Louis MO 63130 8/10/2026 $200,000.00

C253517 08/11/2026 Will of the People Missouri Organizing and Voter Engagement Action 4526 Paseo Blvd Kansas City MO 64110 8/10/2026 $175,000.00

[emphasis added]

You think organizing and field is in someone’s future?

Mike Kehoe (r) and the right wingnut controlled Missouri General Assembly lay eggs

05 Wednesday Aug 2026

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance, Missouri General Assembly, Missouri Governor, Missouri House, Missouri Senate

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Amendment 4, Amendment 5, August primary, ballot initiatives, campaign finance, class warfare, election, General Assembly, HJR 173, HJR 3, income tax repeal, Losers, Mike Kehoe, missouri, NEA, PAC, Primary, regressive taxation, right wingnut welfare, right wingnuts, shift the tax burden, welfare for billionaires and millionaires

A king’s ransom…

All that out-of-state dark money gone to waste. Heh.

Amendment 4 (HJR 3) would have placed restrictive requirements on initiative petitions.

Amendment 5 (HJR 173) would have repealed the state income tax, providing right wingnut welfare for millionaires and billionaires while increasing the regressive tax burden on working Missourians.

The results:

State of Missouri – State of Missouri – Primary Election, August 04, 2026
Unofficial Results
as of 8/5/2026 6:45:40 AM

[….]

Constitutional Amendment No. 4 3235 of 3235 Precincts Reported
YES 275,040 19.677%
NO 1,122,748 80.323%
Total Votes: 1,397,788

Constitutional Amendment No. 5 3235 of 3235 Precincts Reported
YES 233,309 16.684%
NO 1,165,085 83.316%
Total Votes: 1,398,394

[emphasis added]

Results in select counties:

Boone
Constitutional Amendment No. 4 54 of 54 Precincts Reported
YES 7,042 15.285%
NO 39,028 84.715%
Total Votes: 46,070

Constitutional Amendment No. 5 54 of 54 Precincts Reported
YES 6,292 13.662%
NO 39,763 86.338%
Total Votes: 46,055

[emphasis added]

Cass
Constitutional Amendment No. 4 48 of 48 Precincts Reported
YES 5,914 23.761%
NO 18,976 76.239%
Total Votes: 24,890

Constitutional Amendment No. 5 48 of 48 Precincts Reported
YES 5,437 21.862%
NO 19,433 78.138%
Total Votes: 24,870

[emphasis added]

Clay
Constitutional Amendment No. 4 82 of 82 Precincts Reported
YES 10,517 17.872%
NO 48,330 82.128%
Total Votes: 58,847

Constitutional Amendment No. 5 82 of 82 Precincts Reported
YES 10,686 18.174%
NO 48,112 81.826%
Total Votes: 58,798

[emphasis added]

De Kalb
Constitutional Amendment No. 4 7 of 7 Precincts Reported
YES 452 20.527%
NO 1,750 79.473%
Total Votes: 2,202

Constitutional Amendment No. 5 7 of 7 Precincts Reported
YES 315 14.292%
NO 1,889 85.708%
Total Votes: 2,204

[emphasis added]

Greene
Constitutional Amendment No. 4 85 of 85 Precincts Reported
YES 12,418 19.364%
NO 51,710 80.636%
Total Votes: 64,128

Constitutional Amendment No. 5 85 of 85 Precincts Reported
YES 10,241 15.969%
NO 53,890 84.031%
Total Votes: 64,131

[emphasis added]

Henry
Constitutional Amendment No. 4 10 of 10 Precincts Reported
YES 1,179 20.731%
NO 4,508 79.269%
Total Votes: 5,687

Constitutional Amendment No. 5 10 of 10 Precincts Reported
YES 932 16.337%
NO 4,773 83.663%
Total Votes: 5,705

Johnson
Constitutional Amendment No. 4 10 of 10 Precincts Reported
YES 2,237 22.580%
NO 7,670 77.420%
Total Votes: 9,907

Constitutional Amendment No. 5 10 of 10 Precincts Reported
YES 1,687 17.030%
NO 8,219 82.970%
Total Votes: 9,906

[emphasis added]

Moniteau
Constitutional Amendment No. 4 11 of 11 Precincts Reported
YES 853 21.788%
NO 3,062 78.212%
Total Votes: 3,915

Constitutional Amendment No. 5 11 of 11 Precincts Reported
YES 583 14.865%
NO 3,339 85.135%
Total Votes: 3,922

[emphasis added]

Kansas City
Constitutional Amendment No. 4 73 of 73 Precincts Reported
YES 5,681 9.703%
NO 52,867 90.297%
Total Votes: 58,548

Constitutional Amendment No. 5 73 of 73 Precincts Reported
YES 6,454 11.022%
NO 52,101 88.978%
Total Votes: 58,555

[emphasis added]

St Louis City
Constitutional Amendment No. 4 184 of 184 Precincts Reported
YES 5,561 9.046%
NO 55,912 90.954%
Total Votes: 61,473

Constitutional Amendment No. 5 184 of 184 Precincts Reported
YES 6,355 10.327%
NO 55,181 89.673%
Total Votes: 61,536

[emphasis added]

You get the picture.

Governor Mike Kehoe (r):

Amendment 5 August Primary Election Results
August 4, 2026

Throughout this conversation on eliminating the state income tax, we made the case that Missouri should think boldly about its future, challenge the status quo, and pursue policies that make our state more competitive.

While Amendment 5 did not earn the support it needed, I believe our work is far from over.

I remain committed to working with the General Assembly in the years ahead on ways to continue cutting taxes, growing our state’s economy, and pursuing conservative policies that help Missouri families keep more of what they earn.

Give it a rest, loser.

Mike Kehoe (r) [2025 file photo].

The correct answer is “No” – polls close at 7:00 p.m in Missouri

04 Tuesday Aug 2026

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Amendment 4, Amendment 5, August primary, ballot initiatives, campaign finance, class warfare, election, General Assembly, HJR 173, HJR 3, income tax repeal, Mike Kehoe, missouri, Missouri Promise, NEA, PAC, Primary, Project Majority Rule, regressive taxation, right wingnut welfare, right wingnuts, shift the tax burden, welfare for billionaires and millionaires

If you are in line by 7:00 p.m. you can still vote.

“Vote No on Amendments 4 & 5”

Right wingnut campaign signs near the right-of-way next to polling place signs at midday:

Amendment 3 (another “No”) is not on the ballot until November. Go figure.

Paid for by the usual out-of-state suspects:

Amendment 4 (HJR 3) would place restrictive requirements on initiative petitions by Missouri voters.

Previously:

About that ‘inconvenient’ redress of grievances thing… (June 5, 2026)

Campaign Finance: but wait, there’s even more (June 5, 2026)

Campaign Finance: way, way in (June 13, 2026)

Campaign Finance: Democracy (June 19, 2026)

Campaign Finance: fight the power (July 10, 2026)

Campaign Finance: next, you need to vote (July 19, 2026)

Amendment 5 (HJR 173) would eliminate Missouri’s income tax and redistribute a regressive tax burden to non-wealthy Missourians.

Previously:

Campaign Finance: for billionaires and millionaires (May 30, 2026)

Bait and switch (June 3, 2026)

Campaign Finance: promising us high regressive sales taxes (June 14, 2026)

MoGop’s Dark Money (June 20, 2026)

Gov. Mike Kehoe (r): “Missouri voters are stupid” (June 24, 2026)

Campaign Finance: Missouri is a suburb of Ohio…and Virginia (July 7, 2026)

Campaign Finance: When they say, “We’ll make the rubble bounce,” they add, “…this high.” (July 8, 2026)

Campaign Finance: Kings take pawns (July 10, 2026)

Campaign Finance: throw in dark money, stir… (July 16, 2026)

Campaign Finance: Missouri is an expensive suburb of Ohio…and Virginia (July 16, 2016)

Campaign Finance: Maryland, Virginia, whatever… (July 18, 2026)

Campaign Finance: Pennies from heaven? (July 23, 2026)

Campaign Finance: Sadly, no

27 Monday Jul 2026

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

campaign finance, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, PAC, right wingnuts

Today at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

243110 07/27/2026 Missouri Prospers PAC Good Day Farm Missouri 425 West Capitol Ave Suite 1350 Little Rock AR 72201 7/27/2026 $150,000.00

[emphasis added]

Hasn’t felt like it for years.

Arkansas?

Lame-duck Missouri governor still raising campaign cash with the help of lobbyist
[….]
September 17, 2024 1:15 pm

[….]

Missouri Prospers is one of a constellation of political action committees connected to Tilley, a former Missouri House speaker who became a lobbyist after resigning from office in 2012.

For years, Tilley’s lobbying clients have spread donations among six PACs associated with him and his firm. The PACs then donate that money to candidates.

[….]

← Older posts

Recent Posts

  • Mark Alford (r): it’s all about the photo-op….and the hat
  • Campaign Finance: no quarter
  • Yep, it’s a cult
  • Campaign Finance: suddenly, in October
  • Campaign Finance: a candidate of the people

Recent Comments

Campaign Finance: no… on Campaign Finance: “…
Campaign Finance: no… on Campaign Finance: Next
Campaign Finance: a… on Hey, Brandon Phelps (r), are y…
Campaign Finance: a… on Rick Brattin (r) and Brandon P…
Campaign Finance:… on Denny’s Dirty Ball

Archives

  • October 2026
  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,093,613 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...