• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Monthly Archives: April 2010

It’s the Truman Show, and we ain’t talkin’ about Harry

30 Friday Apr 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

epistemic closure, meta, republicans, Teabaggers

One of the best essays I’ve read lately on the significant number of reality challenged individuals in this country and those who exploit them:

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

An Army of Trumans

…the Right has constructed its own Bubble World, a sort of political Truman Show complete with its own facts and rules (albeit facts and rules that are constantly changing based on political expediency). The writers, directors, and actors in this conservative version of Seahaven are the legions of GOP politicians, operatives, and conservative media outlets that relentlessly push this politically expedient alternative reality, and the Trumans are the millions of regular Americans who don’t realize the joke is on them…

…In this alternative universe, the facts are literally whatever the political consultants say they should be. Whatever resonates with the focus group. If you’re working on behalf of Wall Street lobbyists to kill a bill that would impose more accountability on Wall Street, you simply accuse those who support the bill of doing Wall Street’s bidding. It doesn’t matter that this is the opposite of the truth and is, in fact, exactly what you’re doing. While these facts might matter to people in the empirical world, the facts in Bubble World are whatever the right wing wants them to be….

Go. Read the whole thing.

This resonates. We’ve witnessed it:

Senator Claire McCaskill (D) – health care town hall – Jefferson City (August 26, 2009)

Teabaggers: when the Democrats don’t give them a mic (August 18, 2009)

Senator Claire McCaskill (D): open forum in Hillsboro – photos (August 11, 2009)

Oil and water don’t mix

29 Thursday Apr 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

That’s pretty basic – we learn that one pretty early, and if we have teachers who aren’t just taking up space until retirement, we know by seventh grade why that is – water is what is known as a polar molecule with uneven electron sharing and the molecule is formed by hydrogen bonds. A water molecule carries a slight positive charge at one end and a slight negative charge at the other. Oil, on the other hand, is a hydrocarbon that results in a non-charged molecule formed by carbon bonds that release a LOT of energy when they are broken.

It is lust for that energy that makes human beings do stupid things, like build off-shore drilling rigs to extract oil from beneath the oceans.

This is a game that is simply not worth the candle.

Sane people have always known this, and we have had empirical proof since January 1969, when a gas blowout occurred beneath a Union Oil drilling platform located about six miles off shore from Santa Barbara. Over the next eleven days, 200,000 gallons of crude oil would bubble to the surface, and the slick would eventually cover 800 square miles of ocean and affect 35 miles of coastline. Shore birds such as plovers and willets fled the area, but diving birds became oil-soaked and many died.

Nearly 3700 birds were estimated to have perished because of contact with oil. Aerial surveys a year later found only 200 grebes in an area that had previously drawn 4000 to 7000.

Marine mammals were poisoned. For weeks the tides brought in the corpses of seals and dolphins, and gray whales who traversed the channel as part of their regular migratory route to their calving grounds in the warm waters off the Baja peninsula avoided the area.

The Santa Barbara spill was such an ecological disaster that the very first Earth Day grew out of it a year later.

I have been thinking about the Santa Barbara spill as the reality of the devastation of the Deepwater Horizon spill sets in. And as the oil spreads and gets closer and closer to the delicate marshlands off Louisiana,  I keep hearing that George Santayana quote about people who don’t learn from history being doomed to repeat it over and over and over again.

And that was before they started to come clean about just how much oil is bubbling up from beneath the seabed. So far they are admitting to five thousand barrels a day – do I hear  ten?

Government officials said late Wednesday night that oil might be leaking from a well in the Gulf of Mexico at a rate five times that suggested by initial estimates.

In a hastily called news conference, Rear Adm. Mary E. Landry of the Coast Guard said a scientist from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration had concluded that oil is leaking at the rate of 5,000 barrels a day, not 1,000 as had been estimated. While emphasizing that the estimates are rough given that the leak is at 5,000 feet below the surface, Admiral Landry said the new estimate came from observations made in flights over the slick, studying the trajectory of the spill and other variables.

[…]

Admiral Landry said President Obama had been notified. She also opened up the possibility that if the government determines that BP, which is responsible for the cleanup, cannot handle the spill with the resources available in the private sector, that Defense Department could become involved to contribute technology.

Wind patterns may push the spill into the coast of Louisiana as soon as Friday night, officials said, prompting consideration of more urgent measures to protect coastal wildlife. Among them were using cannons to scare off birds and employing local shrimpers’ boats as makeshift oil skimmers in the shallows.

Part of the oil slick was only 16 miles offshore and closing in on the Mississippi River Delta, the marshlands at the southeastern tip of Louisiana where the river empties into the ocean. Already 100,000 feet of protective booms have been laid down to protect the shoreline, with 500,000 feet more standing by, said Charlie Henry, an oil spill expert for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, at an earlier news conference on Wednesday.

On Wednesday evening, cleanup crews began conducting what is called an in-situ burn, a process that consists of corralling concentrated parts of the spill in a 500-foot-long fireproof boom, moving it to another location and burning it. It has been tested effectively on other spills, but weather and ecological concerns can complicate the procedure.

Can I just say that when bodies of water burn, something is deeply, tragically fucked up?

The people of southern California are still pissed off about the Santa Barbara spill 41 years later. You think the residents of the Gulf Coast are going to have shorter attention spans, especially with Katrina so fresh in memory?

Roy Blunt thinks Arizona immigration law “just common-sense”

29 Thursday Apr 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Arizona immigration law, civil liberties. Tea Party, immigration, missouri, Roy Blunt

In an interview this morning on radio KZRG, Roy Blunt stated that he thought that the Arizona immigration law was “just common sense.” It’s aimed at folks who are here illegally, isn’t it? Other highlights:

Blunt’s biggest (only?) “on-going fight” with Bush was to take issue with the old softie’s warm and fuzzy approach to undocumented workers.

While dancing in the best terpsichorean political style around the interviewer’s question about whether or not the congressman agreed that President Obama was “promoting lawlessness” when he called the Arizona law misguided, Blunt allowed as to how Obama was “even more misguided” than Bush.

According to Blunt, Obama’s statement was intended to “send a message” to the undocumented that he is on their side and not on the side of rule by law, by extension indicating that it is misguided to “enforce the laws of America.” Blunt could have saved himself lots of trouble and just said straight out, without all the circumlocution, that he agrees with the KZRG spokesman.

Oddly, Blunt was neither asked nor did he volunteer any opinions about the constitutionality of the law and its potential to violate the civil liberties of U.S. citizens. The failure to give due consideration to the obvious constitutional issues was especially odd given Rep. Blunt’s effort to pander to Tea Partiers and good ol’ boys, who, as we all know, have their collective panties in a bunch over issues of constitutionality – or what they have been told are constitutional issues – most recently in terms of Obama’s perceived encroachment against their freedom to die without access to health care.

But then, strangely enough, neither do the Tea Partiers themselves seem too worried about defending freedom this time around:  

You say you want to see my papers? Fine. I have them right here.

29 Thursday Apr 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Photobucket

Lee Judge, the editorial cartoonist for the Kansas City Starhas the final word on the xenophobic nonsense.

Representative Mark Parkinson (r): “Show us your papers, please.”

29 Thursday Apr 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Arizona, Clarence Dupnik, General Assembly, HB 2449, immigration, KSHB-TV, Mark Parkinson, missouri, Sloane heller

How long before a right wingnut politician in Missouri jumps on the Arizona Senate Bill 1070 [pdf] bandwagon? Not very.

Reporter Sloane Heller at KSHB-TV in Kansas City is reporting this morning that Representative Mark Parkinson (r) is intent on filing legislation similar to Arizona’s Senate Bill 1070, requiring individuals provide proof of citizenship to law enforcement based on “reasonable suspicion.”

[Kobach]…professor here at UMKC actually helped write the law in Arizona. So, uh, it’s possible, we don’t know, that he could actually help state Representative Mark Parkinson out of St. Charles. Now we talked to Parkinson’s aide yesterday. He gave us some new information about Parkinson’s plan for reform on immigration. Right now Parkinson is backing a bill that would make it a felony to transport illegal immigrants. What he wants to do, he wants to substitute that bill and create one that matches Arizona’s new law. Of course that law gives police the ability to ask for documentation if they suspect somebody is here illegally. Now Parkinson is hoping, uh, to introduce his new bill before the session ends. Uh, critics, of course, have been coming out and talking, the last couple of weeks, saying that this new law in Arizona encourages racial profiling…

If Mark Parkinson (r) has his way Missouri law enforcement officials will have to add B-movie dialog to their repertoire.

In an earlier report Heller also stated that this would be offered as a substitute for HB 2449. HB 2449, in its current form:

HB 2449 Creates various crimes for trafficking, concealing, haboring, sheltering, or transporting illegal aliens

Sponsor: Parkinson, Mark A. (16) Proposed Effective Date: 08/28/2010

CoSponsor: Jones, Timothy W. (89) ……….etal. LR Number: 5481L.02I

Last Action: 04/20/2010 – Referred: International Trade and Immigration (H)

HB2449

Next Hearing: INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND IMMIGRATION

Date: Wednesday, 04/28/2010 Time: 5:00p.m. or upon afternoon adjournment

Location: Hearing Room 7

Executive session may follow.

Calendar: Bill currently not on a calendar

Missouri House proposes immigration reform

….The measure was proposed on April 1, and is the only bill proposed this year that deals directly with the criminal enforcement of illegal immigration.

The sponsor, State Rep. Mark Parkinson, R-St. Charles, said the bill has “nothing to do with Arizona,” and called it an “economic issue.” He cited the state’s unemployment figures, which were at 9.5 percent in March, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Mr. Parkinson said the bill would protect undocumented workers from exploitation by employers, and would assert the state’s stance against federal immigration reform, which has yet to be proposed.

“This is going to send a message to the White House,” Mr. Parkinson said. “Missourians don’t want amnesty….”

“…he [Parkinson] wants to substitute that bill and create one that matches Arizona’s new law…”

“…nothing to do with Arizona…” Really. Which side of your mouth did that come out of?

And what does the Sheriff of Pima County, Arizona (which is on the state’s southern border with Mexico) think of the law?:

The Dupnik rebellion: Pima’s top cop says “no” to SB 1070

TUCSON (KGUN9-TV) – Pima County’s top lawman says he has no intention of enforcing Arizona’s controversial crackdown on illegal immigration.  Sheriff Clarence Dupnik calls SB 1070 “racist,” “disgusting,” and “unnecessary.”

Speaking Tuesday morning with KGUN9’s Steve Nunez, Dupnik made it clear that while he will not comply with the provisions of the new law, nor will he let illegal immigrants go free.  “We’re going to keep doing what we’ve been doing all along,” Dupnik said.  “We’re going to stop and detain these people for the Border Patrol.”

The sheriff acknowledged that this course of action could get him hauled into court.  SB 1070 allows citizens to sue any law enforcement official who doesn’t comply with the law.  But Dupnik told Nunez that SB 1070 would force his deputies to adopt racial profiling as an enforcement tactic, which Dupnik says could also get him sued. “So we’re kind of in a damned if we do, damned if we don’t situation. It’s just a stupid law.”

Dupnik had harsh words for anyone who thinks SB 1070 will not lead to racial profiling. “If I tell my people to go out and look for A, B, and C, they’re going to do it. They’ll find some flimsy excuse like a tail light that’s not working  as a basis for a stop, which is a bunch of baloney.”

Remember, Pima County is on the border with Mexico.

So, how long before teabaggers flood town halls screaming about a ‘police state’. [sound of crickets]

Showdown in the Heartland

28 Wednesday Apr 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Bank of America, GRO, missouri, QC Holdings, Robin Acree, Showdown in the Heartland

“Bank of America, Bad for America!” chanted the crowd gathered in the shadow of the impregnable, forbidding Bank of America tower in Kansas City on Tuesday. A coalition of progressive groups brought a couple of hundred demonstrators to KC on Tuesday. The plan there, as in other cities on Tuesday, was to soften up “Bad for America” for Wednesday’s massive demonstration at the annual stockholders’ meeting in Charlotte, N.C. The Bad for America slogan was for openers. The rally goers had lots more:

“Bailout. No thanks.

Bust up. Big Banks.”

“Predatory lender.

Criminal offender.”

“Big banks, you suck.

You’ll do anything for a buck.”

“Who got the money, money?

Who got the money, money?

You got the money, money.

We got the bill.”

Okay, it’s doggerel. But does a pack of greedy dogs deserve anything better?

Too bad yesterday that we didn’t have a fly (with a video camera) on the local executive’s wall, because it must have chafed the suit and tie that he had to tolerate the de classe crowd on the public sidewalk in front of his domain. (As a group, we had to stay off their property. I ventured onto the plaza to take pictures and was politely instructed by a cop to move back to the sidewalk.) Anyway, a video of the exec’s remarks about us would probably have electrified a crowd that was already galvanized. Mr. Bank Exec had to play it gracious, though. When the hoi polloi wanted into the bank to deliver a letter with its demands, he ordered that the group’s representatives be allowed in with no fuss. Otherwise, we’d have just hung around on the sidewalk chanting and showing our signs to the passing traffic.

Robin Acree of GRO was gutsy and funny leading the rally. She called out the CEO of B of A, Brian Moynihan, for heading an operation responsible for more foreclosures than anybody else. She pointed to a picture parody of Don Early, head of the payday loan company QC Holdings. In Missouri, those bloodsuckers charge an average of 431 percent annually on loans.

And guess who the third largest shareholder in QC Holdings might be. Its name begins with Bank and ends with America.

 

Robin told the story of attending a hearing about payday loan companies in Hannibal–a meeting that was also attended by the Missouri payday loan industry spokeshole, Tom Linafelt. Out on the parking lot after the hearing, she heard him say to one of his buddies, “That group that was badmouthing us, that’s those people from Mexico, MO. They’re out to take us down.” Robin grinned at the memory and told the crowd, “Too right!”

    

Notice at the end of the video that some of us have more youth and bounce than some of the rest of us.

After having its say at Bad for America, the crowd moved on to the KC offices of QC Holdings, which is in an office building so expensive that the sign in front is marble with real gold hammered into the words “Corporate Woods.” QC Holdings is on the fifteenth floor. That’s private property. And a security guard with an attitude promptly said, in his snarkiest voice, that he was calling the cops. Once the cops came, they politely asked the group to leave, and the crowd departed.

Step a few presumptuous toes onto their private property, and you find out how gracious the well heeled really are.

CLIMATE CHANGE CANNOT WAIT

28 Wednesday Apr 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

This country and the planet cannot afford to delay climate and clean energy legislation. It is that simple. Every day Washington politics puts our clean energy future on hold our economy gets weaker, our enemies get stronger, and the planet gets more polluted. It has been almost a year since the House approved comprehensive clean energy and climate legislation to create jobs, cut our oil imports in half and reduce the carbon pollution that threatens us all, and we are still waiting for the Senate to act. The time is now for comprehensive clean energy and climate legislation that jump-starts our economy, strengthens national security, and leads to a healthier planet.

The petitions, rallies, e-mails and letters from around the country are sending a loud and clear message of broad support. The NRDC Action Fund has worked tirelessly to urge the Senate to stand up for a strong clean energy and climate bill. And just last week Capitol Hill saw a display of this commitment as “tens of thousands…gathered on the National Mall for a concert and rally” not only to celebrate the 40th anniversary of Earth Day but to call “for real leadership in the Senate”.

The President has also been crystal clear in his call to take action for passing “comprehensive clean energy and climate bill ‘that will safeguard our planet, and spur innovation and help us to compete in the 21st Century.”

Senators Kerry, Graham, and Lieberman have dedicated months to pulling together a Senate bill. As Representative Ed Markey asserts, “Right now we’ve got the best chance [to pass the legislation] in a generation…and it would just be a shame to lose it”. A delay in climate legislation would be more than just a shame, but, in the words of Thomas Freidman, “a disaster”.

Of course, Mr. Freidman is giving voice to the concerns of many. Not passing comprehensive clean energy and climate legislation now means we are not only racing toward a potential tipping point ecologically, but we are postponing economic growth and threatening national security.

It has been almost two decades since 1,600 senior scientists from 70 countries signed the statement warning “all humanity of what lies ahead. A great change in our stewardship of the earth and the life on it, is required, if vast human misery is to be avoided and our global home on this planet is not to be irretrievably mutilated.”

A comprehensive clean energy policy will “boost growth, create 2.8 million jobs, slash pollution” and drastically cut our dependence on foreign oil.

The U.S. Department of Defense declared “climate change a national security threat”, that will “contribute to food and water scarcity, will increase the spread of disease, and may spur or exacerbate mass migration.”

Our inaction also raises doubt in the rest of the world that America is still able to provide leadership on issues of global concern. We are already getting left behind as we continue to sit on the sidelines while “China is…leading the world…in wind production and…solar production.” This country was not built on the principle of inaction. Our founders were leaders who risked everything to make this country great.

The Senate has the historic opportunity to flip the switch and get onto a path to a prosperous and sustainable future. The truth is, “This generation of politicians is the last generation who have it in their power to secure the future of our planet, to safeguard the health and livelihoods of millions of people and the habitats that sustain their lives. History will not forgive them if they fail to act.”

So we need members from all parties, the officials elected to lead this country, to sit down now and get this bill back on track – for us and the generations to come.

Heather Taylor-Miesle is the director of the NRDC Action Fund. Become a fan on Facebook or Twitter.

The Great Coal Debate at Washington University … continued

28 Wednesday Apr 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Bruce Nilles, Bryan Walsh, coal, electricity generation, Fred Palmer, missouri, Peabody Coal, The Great Debate

Note:  (4/27/2010, 4:40 p.m.) This posting has been substantially edited so as not to duplicate the content of an earlier posting, “Wash U Students Kick Ash.”

(Above: Clips from the Great Coal Debate, April 27, 2010; see entire debate here)

Tuesday evening, Fred Palmer, VP of of Government Relations for Peabody Coal, and Bruce Nilles of the Sierra Club’s Beyond Coal Campaign squared off to debate the pros and cons of coal-based energy before an audience of more than 500 people at Washington University’s Graham Chapel. The “Great Coal Debate,” moderated by Bryan Walsh, Environmental Correspondent for Time Magazine, was an outgrowth of student concerns that the University’s embrace of the Peabody-funded Consortium for Clean Coal Utilization might serve coal industry anti-regulation goals as much as the University’s research goals.

Sarah Jo has summarized the the proceedings below. Take a look at her reactions which were spot on.

I will only add to Sarah Jo’s impressions that for me the real icing on the cake was Fred Palmer’s answer (or as Nilles put it, his non-answer) to the moderator’s question about whether or not Palmer believes that climate change was caused by human activity. After a lot of careful hemming and hawing during which he allowed that a lot of smart people, President Obama and Washington University Chancellor Mark Wrighton among them, do believe in anthropogenic climate change, and the respect with which Peabody coal holds these smart people means that the company will work to reduce CO2 emissions, he took refuge in a straw man argument. He declared that he, and, one assumes by extension, Peabody coal, is not inclined to trade the welfare of people right now in order to fix some hypothetical event in the future – as if an either/or scenario were the only possibility.  

Kinda says it all – big, important business people who understand strategic planning don’t believe in taking a huge scientific consensus seriously when weighing future outcomes that affect public welfare. Of course, maybe this live-for-today attitude just might mean that the public welfare is not what moves Peabody coal?

Wash U students kick ash

28 Wednesday Apr 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 5 Comments

Tags

Peabody Energy, Sierra Club's Beyond Coal Campaign, Washington University Student Union, Youth Climate Movement

Washington University students in St. Louis know their stuff when it comes to dirty energy, but they are especially agitated about what’s going on right under their noses. Peabody Energy and Arch Coal, two of the largest coal companies in the U.S., are both headquartered in St. Louis.

When they each donated $5 million (along with Ameren UE’s $2 million) to set up the Consortium for Clean Coal Utilization on the Wash U campus, students saw the reality behind the smog mask.

Last November, the Student Union passed a resolution urging the University to change the name of the consortium because “clean coal” is a lie.  Good for them !  When the University sponsored a theatrical “symposium” presenting the benefits of “green coal,” (no, that’s not a typo) the students answered with a counter rally of their own.

Yesterday, the Wash U Student Union sponsored a debate between Bruce Nilles, leader of Sierra Club’s Beyond Coal Campaign, and Fred Palmer,  Senior VP of Government Relations at Peabody Energy.  Prior to yesterday’s event, Bruce Nilles had an op-ed in the student newspaper presenting the case against coal in a nutshell.

When the two debaters came out on stage at Graham Chapel, I kind of felt sorry for Fred Palmer.  But the old geezer held up his end of the bargain pretty well considering the audience was filled with anti-coal people.  Mr. Palmer is originally from Phoenix and showed off his cowboy boots.  He let it slip that he feels trapped here in “the middle of the country.”  Poor guy.  But he spends lots of time in D.C. and China selling his smokescreen of carnival tricks too.

According to Mr. Palmer, coal is responsible for all the wonderful things humans enjoy.  Instead of carrying bundles of twigs on our backs to heat our homes, we can just turn on the furnace and VOILA, the magic of electricity warms us, keeps the lights on, powers our computers and makes life better for people everywhere.  I kid you not.  He actually said that caring for people is Peabody’s first priority.  

Comparing modern power plants to bundles of twigs is one of those “the hand is quicker than the eye” carnival illusions lobbyists are so good at.  Keep the rubes distracted while you dazzle them with nonsense.

Keep in mind that Missouri gets 83.5% of its energy from those black rocks loaded with carbon, making it one of the brownest states in the nation.  Keep in mind that coal ash is full of deadly stuff that contaminates the air we breathe and the water we drink.

Bruce Nilles reminded us that the only reason coal is the cheapest source of energy is because the true cost is externalized to the general population.  E.g., the three coal plants in the St. Louis area create $750 million each year in health care and clean up costs.  As student leader Kady McFadden asked in the introduction to the debate, “Is cheap energy worth the cost?”

In response to Palmer’s claim that coal energy is good for America, Nilles asked, if so, why isn’t West Virginia one of the richest states in the union instead of one of the poorest?

If audience members expected the Peabody spokesman to be embarrassed about the damage done by mountain top mining or the explosion that killed 29 Americans in West Virginia recently, no need to hold our breath.  Palmer defused that awkward topic right away by saying Peabody hasn’t mined in West VA in three years and he felt really bad about those poor guys who died in a Massey mine.  His chart showing Peabody’s safety record made my heart leap with pride, and I think I heard strains of “America, the Beautiful” wafting throught the open windows.

When asked about progress being made with alternative forms of energy, Nilles pointed to Ontario, Los Angeles and Wisconsin.  Because Canadians all pay for health care from one big pool of money, they see the direct impact of pollution on their medical bills.  They are phasing out all of their coal-fired plants.  There are no coal plants in California, but LA has been buying its power from out-of-state plants. They’ve recently decided to bring that economic piece of the pie back to their own city.  Wisconsin state buildings had been using coal from Wyoming but are switching to wind and solar in order to create jobs for their own people.

Climate legislation is “on life support” in Washington, according to Nilles, because the dirty energy companies are putting the screws to Congress. The EPA is supposedly considering a move to label coal ash “hazardous” which would be a real game changer.  Sen. McCaskill is on record as being opposed to the new designation.  We don’t even have to wonder where Sen. Bond stands on this, do we?  Call Sen. McCaskill.  Who knows?  Maybe a ton people calling her might outweigh a ton of coal money. Check out EarthJustice’s web page on coal ash with link to EPA.

 Watch the Great Coal Debate here and be prepared for future actions by Wash U students. On May 21st, US Energy Secretary Steven Chu will address the graduating class.  Fred Palmer claims that Chu is “on board” with the new “green coal” technology.  We’ll see.

“Nixon steps up attack on historic preservation tax credit”

28 Wednesday Apr 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

historic preservation tax credits, Jay Nixon

So says the headline on Political Fix. I think it’s probably about time we step up our attacks on Jay Nixon.

From what I understand, historic preservation tax credits were capped last year at the current level of spending. So making them the target of cuts in the runaway levels of tax credits given out each year is either stupid or disingenuous or both. And two thumbs down for playing supporters of the historic tax credit against supporters of public education in what Nixon calls a “zero sum game.”

It’s not a zero sum game. The historic preservation tax credits provide a lot of bang for the buck in revitalizing older neighborhoods not only in the cores of urban areas like St. Louis and Kansas City, but also small towns all over the state who have seen the storefronts from their old Main Streets vanish with neglect. A better local economy with better neighborhoods is far better for public schools than a slightly bigger state government teat.

Count me among a growing group of people who aren’t very excited about Nixon’s re-election campaign in 2012. I loathe Peter Kinder, but given Nixon’s poor track record so far, it’s going to be difficult for me to get out to knock doors and make phone calls on Nixon’s behalf. And I’m not alone.

← Older posts

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 726,498 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

 

Loading Comments...