• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Monthly Archives: June 2012

Campaign Finance: definitely not for Ed

29 Friday Jun 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

2012, Attorney General, campaign finance, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission

Today, at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C091291 06/29/2012 DEMOCRATIC ATTORNEYS GENERAL ASSOCIATION – MISSOURI Altria Client Services Inc. 6601 West Broad Street Richmond VA 23230 6/28/2012 $25,000.00

C091291 06/29/2012 DEMOCRATIC ATTORNEYS GENERAL ASSOCIATION – MISSOURI Anheuser Busch 1 Busch Place St Louis MO 63118 6/28/2012 $25,000.00

C091291 06/29/2012 DEMOCRATIC ATTORNEYS GENERAL ASSOCIATION – MISSOURI Pfizer 235 East 42nd Street New York NY 10017 6/28/2012 $50,000.00

C091291 06/29/2012 DEMOCRATIC ATTORNEYS GENERAL ASSOCIATION – MISSOURI Zeneca Services 1800 Concord Pike PO Box 15437 Wilmington DE 19850 6/28/2012 $25,000.00

C091291 06/29/2012 DEMOCRATIC ATTORNEYS GENERAL ASSOCIATION – MISSOURI Visa U.S.A. Inc. PO Box 8999 San Francisco CA 94128 6/28/2012 $50,000.00

C091291 06/29/2012 DEMOCRATIC ATTORNEYS GENERAL ASSOCIATION – MISSOURI Recording Industry Association of America, Inc. 1025 F Street N.W. 10th Floor Washington DC 20004 6/28/2012 $25,000.00

C091291 06/29/2012 DEMOCRATIC ATTORNEYS GENERAL ASSOCIATION – MISSOURI Coca-Cola North America 1 Coca Cola Plz NW Atlanta GA 30313 6/28/2012 $25,000.00

C091291 06/29/2012 DEMOCRATIC ATTORNEYS GENERAL ASSOCIATION – MISSOURI E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Company PO Box 80040 Wilmington DE 19880 6/28/2012 $25,000.00

C091291 06/29/2012 DEMOCRATIC ATTORNEYS GENERAL ASSOCIATION – MISSOURI Facebook, Inc 1601 Willow Rd Menlo Park CA 94025 6/28/2012 $25,000.00

C091291 06/29/2012 DEMOCRATIC ATTORNEYS GENERAL ASSOCIATION – MISSOURI LeadsOnline 15660 Dallas Pkwy Ste 800 Dallas TX 75248 6/28/2012 $15,000.00

[emphasis added]

That $290,000.00.

It doesn’t appear that corporate America is particularly interested in spending their money on the right wingnut candidate for attorney general.

That didn't take long … Missouri GOPers still trying to stall ACA implementation

29 Friday Jun 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

First we had Jane Cunningham rushing around like the proverbial chicken with its cut-off, squawking (OK – I know I just mentioned headless chickens – but pretend you don’t know that, all right?) about how efforts to implement the federally mandated health exchanges in Missouri represented the weight of the jack-booted, facist, socialist state and so on. Unless state officials have managed to do some planning on the QT, the result is, of course, that Missouri’s going to have to hustle to meet the 2014 deadline and it’s going to be harder to do it right.

Now, the Supremes endorsement of the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was hardly out of the can, when similar Missouri pols are pulling Cunninghams.    

What yesterday meant to me

29 Friday Jun 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

By @BGinKC

Last night was just about the best night’s sleep I’ve had since I started my career in healthcare nearly thirty years ago. I started working in the early eighties in Wichita, and I entered the field just as the first bricks of the crumbling system were begining to fall down around our ears. We shored it up and soldiered on, but I have known from day one that it was FUBAR — literally, my first day working in the ER at Wesley Medical Center, a car from Oklahoma pulled up to the doors and pushed out a 59-year-old uninsured man who had suffered a stroke out of the back seat of the car in the ambulance bay and sped away. I was horrified and didn’t hide it, but a nurse with fifteen years under her belt snorted and said “Happens all the time, Sweetness.”

That was my first clue that things were well and truly fucked, and that my moral belief that healthcare was and is a basic human right was not a position everyone shared. Her words would echo in my head for years, because in the years I worked, that same thing happened literally hundreds of times, and it happened in every Emergency Department I ever worked in.

I have watched as premiums climbed and care was compromised. I have served my community through the malpractice crisis that saw women in labor being flown by helicopter from western Kansas to one of the hospitals in Wichita because there wasn’t a doctor within 150 miles of their town that would deliver their baby.

I lived through “capitation” by HMOs in the nineties. Capitation punished doctors financially for providing appropriate care for their patients, and people died as a result.

I lived through worrying about my own children as they, one after another, aged out of the system that covers us. At some point, all three of them lived without insurance for a while when they were young adults because they were kicked off ours, couldn’t afford to buy their own and working jobs that didn’t offer it.

If it had been up to me, Clinton would have gotten it done and we would be at single payer by now, but that didn’t happen, and playing the what-if game is a waste of time because it didn’t happen. But that wasn’t the case this time around, and we really did get something done.

It isn’t the single-payer, universal system that we need, but it’s a start, and frankly, if we got that overnight, it would be a mess. Before we can serve the needs of everyone in a universal coverage system, we need to train, at minimum, 100,000 new primary care physicians and 250,000 Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants.

That is the reality of our system that continued to crumble for thirty fucking years before we did anything about it.

This is not the sort of mess that is going to be cleaned up easily or overnight. There is no magic bullet, no special incantation that can be chanted, no wand that can be waved.

Yesterday’s ruling that upheld the law is just the beginning. Now that we have it, we have to fight like hell to protect it, and expand it to cover more people. But we also have to fight like hell for the infrastructure and the providers that we need in order to get to that civilized ideal: true universal coverage for all.

Rep. Todd Akin (r): mixing those wedge issue metaphors

29 Friday Jun 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

2012, Claire McCaskill, missouri, Senate, Todd Akin

A statement by Representative Todd Akins (r), at his House of Representatives web site:

Akin Statement on SCOTUS Decision Regarding Obamacare

Washington, DC – Congressman Todd Akin (R-MO) released the following statement regarding today’s decision by the United States Supreme Court upholding the Affordable Care Act.

“Since its inception I have fought against the adoption of Obamacare and I applaud the innumerable citizens who have stood for freedom, common sense and the right to life in opposition to this dangerous piece of socialist engineering.

“Today’s ruling does not end the need for continued opposition to this offensive overreach into the most private aspect of Americans’ lives.  With this decision, I, my conservative colleagues and a substantial majority of Americans will redouble our campaign to defund and repeal all of Obamacare.

###

“…I applaud the innumerable citizens who have stood for freedom, common sense and the right to life in opposition to this dangerous piece of socialist engineering…” [emphasis added]

“…Today’s ruling does not end the need for continued opposition to this offensive overreach into the most private aspect of Americans’ lives…” [emphasis added]

Because, of course, the reproductive decisions of any American is definitely public business.

Seriously, we lose to these people?

Previously: Todd Akin “goes the full wack-a-doo” over the Supreme Court ACA ruling (June 28, 2012)

President Barack Obama (D) had a very good day at the Supreme Court yesterday

29 Friday Jun 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Affordable Care Act, health care reform, Obama, Supreme Court

That sounded so good this morning I just had to repeat it here.

President Barack Obama talks on the phone with Solicitor General Donald Verrilli in the Oval Office, after learning of the Supreme Court’s ruling on the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,” June 28, 2012. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

Last week:

Boehner to U.S. House on healthcare ruling: don’t gloat

June 21, 2012|Reuters

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – U.S. House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner on Thursday told the Republican rank-and-file there will be no celebrating in Congress if the Supreme Court rules against President Barack Obama’s sweeping healthcare reform law.

“No one knows what the court will decide,” Boehner said in a memo to fellow Republicans. “But if the court strikes down all or part of the president’s healthcare reform law, there will be no spiking of the ball.”

Yeah, like anyone in his party would’ve followed that advice.

Now they can’t celebrate, but we will.

Todd Akin "goes the full wack-a-doo" over the Supreme Court ACA ruling

29 Friday Jun 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

ACA, Affordable Care Act, missouri, Obamacare, Todd Akin

Over at the Maddow Blog, Kent Jones has some fun with Missouri’s own Rep. Todd Akin (R-2) – it’s hard, though, to figure out which is funniest, Akin’s hysterical prose or Jones’ satirical response. Go, read, laugh.  

Then cry when you remember this clown is running for the Senate to replace Claire McCaskill, who, no matter what else you may think about her, is both sane and intelligent.

*Link corrected.  

Campaign Finance: what happens on a slow news day

29 Friday Jun 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

2012, campaign finance, Dave Spence, governor, Jay Nixon, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission

Today, at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C001135 06/28/2012 JAY NIXON FOR MISSOURI FEAPAC of Missouri 11880 College Boulevard Suite 120 Overland Park KS 66210 6/26/2012 $10,000.00

C001135 06/28/2012 JAY NIXON FOR MISSOURI Husch Blackwell LLP 190 Carondelet Plaza Suite 600 Saint Louis MO 63105 6/26/2012 $10,000.00

C001135 06/28/2012 JAY NIXON FOR MISSOURI Burns & McDonnell PO Box 419173 Kansas City MO 64141 6/26/2012 $10,000.00

C001135 06/28/2012 JAY NIXON FOR MISSOURI Kansas City Power & Light Company PO Box 418679 Kansas City MO 64141 6/26/2012 $10,000.00

C001135 06/28/2012 JAY NIXON FOR MISSOURI Carey & Danis, LLC 8235 Forsyth Boulevard Suite 1101 Saint Louis MO 63105 6/26/2012 $25,000.00

[emphasis added]

C111205 06/28/2012 SPENCE FOR GOVERNOR Jeff Fox 26 W. Brentmoor Park St Louis MO 63105 Harbour Group CEO 6/28/2012 $10,000.00

C111205 06/28/2012 SPENCE FOR GOVERNOR Lewis & Clark Regional Leadership Fund P.O. Box 1013 St Charles MO 63302 6/28/2012 $25,000.00

[emphasis added]

Can’t tell which of candidates supports or is opposed to the Affordable Care Act mandate, can you?  

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): doubling down on wingnut

29 Friday Jun 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

4th Comgressional District, Eric Holder, missouri, Teresa Hensley, Vicky Hartzler

Via Twitter:

Rep. Vicky Hartzler ‏@RepHartzler

Voting to hold Eric Holder in contempt for lying to congress and impeding the investigation of the death of Brian Terry over Fast & Furious. 1:34 PM – 28 Jun 12

Rep. Vicky Hartzler ‏@RepHartzler

Democrats are staging a publicity stunt by walking out trying to portray this as about race and not justice. Sad they side with obstruction. 1:36 PM – 28 Jun 12

The best take on this, from a comment at Doghouse Riley’s place:

….because right-wing bile and unicorn farts are the proper business of the US Congress, natch….

Too stoopid to remember to breathe

29 Friday Jun 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Affordable Care Act, health care, Rand Paul, Supreme Court

From the actual press release from the junior senator from Kentucky:

“….Just because a couple people on the Supreme Court declare something to be ‘constitutional’ does not make it so. The whole thing remains unconstitutional. While the court may have erroneously come to the conclusion that the law is allowable, it certainly does nothing to make this mandate or government takeover of our health care right,” Sen. Paul said….

[emphasis added]

Yes it does, moron.

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)

….The Constitution vests the whole judicial power of the United States in one Supreme Court, and such inferior courts as Congress shall, from time to time, ordain and establish. This power is expressly extended to all cases arising under the laws of the United States…

….It is emphatically the province and duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is….

….So, if a law be in opposition to the Constitution, if both the law and the Constitution apply to a particular case, so that the Court must either decide that case conformably to the law, disregarding the Constitution, or conformably to the Constitution, disregarding the law, the Court must determine which of these conflicting rules governs the case. This is of the very essence of judicial duty.

If, then, the Courts are to regard the Constitution, and the Constitution is superior to any ordinary act of the Legislature, the Constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the case to which they both apply.

Those, then, who controvert the principle that the Constitution is to be considered in court as a paramount law are reduced to the necessity of maintaining that courts must close their eyes on the Constitution, and see only the law.

This doctrine would subvert the very foundation of all written Constitutions. It would declare that an act which, according to the principles and theory of our government, is entirely void, is yet, in practice, completely obligatory. It would declare that, if the Legislature shall do what is expressly forbidden, such act, notwithstanding the express prohibition, is in reality effectual. It would be giving to the Legislature a practical and real omnipotence with the same breath which professes to restrict their powers within narrow limits. It is prescribing limits, and declaring that those limits may be passed at pleasure.

That it thus reduces to nothing what we have deemed the greatest improvement on political institutions — a written Constitution, would of itself be sufficient, in America where written Constitutions have been viewed with so much reverence, for rejecting the construction. But the peculiar expressions of the Constitution of the United States furnish additional arguments in favour of its rejection.

The judicial power of the United States is extended to all cases arising under the Constitution….

[emphasis added]

Rand Paul is a fucking idiot. We lose to these people?

Roy Blunt on the Obamacare decision: A self-fulfillilng prophecy?

28 Thursday Jun 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

ACA, health care reform, missouri, Obamacare, Roy Blunt, Supreme Court

In the wake of today’s Supreme Court decision to uphold the Affordable Care Act (ACA), a.k.a. Obamacare, my email box has been filled with emails that sport the words “my take” in the subject line. Of special interest: Roy Blunt’s quickly rendered “take” on the decision (full text below the fold).

To take the silliest statement first, Blunt declares that the decision will lead to “greater uncertainty” for small business owners – in spite of the fact that the main source of indecision was rendered moot with today’s ruling. Some folks are slow to pick up on the obvious – and if Blunt isn’t, he’s banking on the fact that his most likely supporters are.

Blunt’s claim that the ACA will lead to higher federal spending has been dealt with ad nauseum. Almost every respectable authority has conceded that if properly implemented, the ACA has the potential to save money by tamping down health care costs. The most recent Congressional Budget Office analysis affirms that belief. Blunt’s mindless repetition of this talking point doesn’t really deserve a response – except that if unchallenged, it has the potential to continue to do harm.

One would be tempted to respond in the same vein to Blunt’s main contention, that “Obamacare will lead to higher health care premiums.” This assertion – particularly now that the mandate has been upheld – is pure fabrication and one is tempted to think that the odor it gives rise to in the current context is the reek of desperation. However, there are scenarios where Blunt’s claim of higher premiums could be realized – but if that is the case, it will be only be because of the actions of Mr. Blunt and his GOP congressional colleagues.

Ed Kilgore points out that many of the ACA’s provisions are dependent on congressional funding and that fact could allow the Republicans to wreak havoc:

…while there was a case to be made that you can’t enact something as complicated and wide-ranging as ACA as part of the budget process, there is zero doubt it would be easy to disable it simply by denying funding for the subsidies, the Medicaid expansion, the exchanges, etc., etc. All of these actions are entirely legitimate in a reconciliation bill, which cannot be filibustered. And on top of everything else, as TPM’s David Kurtz astutely observed today, the Supreme Court’s definition of the mandate as a “tax” may well make the mandate itself germane to a reconciliation bill.

If the mandate were to be repealed via such an indirect strategy, the resulting mess could result in steeply higher premiums. That mess would, of course, be due to the actions of Blunt and pals, but I’m betting they’d get their right-wing echo-chamber fired up and the traditional media would, as it so often does, take its cues from the noisiest parties, and, in the popular mind, the braying of pols like Blunt would be vindicated. I imagine lots of GOPers, not just our Roy, are hoping that this will be the way it works. Of course, to quote Kilgore again:

The best strategy for maintaining ACA, of course, is to win the damn elections.

Dear Friend,

The three questions about the President’s health care plan that have needed to be answered from day one are: Is it constitutional, is it a good idea, and can we afford it? The Court, in a 5-4 decision, answered the first question today. The American people now will decide if the President’s health care takeover is the right thing to do and whether we can afford it.

This decision does not change the fact that ObamaCare will lead to higher health care premiums, increased federal spending, and greater uncertainty for small business owners nationwide. That’s why Congress must repeal this deeply flawed law in its entirety and replace it with thoughtful, common-sense reforms that put patients and doctors in control of health care – not Washington bureaucrats.

I invite you to take a look at my video response to the Supreme Court’s decision.

In 2010, Missourians overwhelmingly rejected the individual mandate and sent a clear signal to Washington that Americans oppose ObamaCare. Elections matter, and this decision underscores the fact that we need new leadership in the White House and the Senate.

As always, I encourage you to join the conversation online by visiting my Facebook and Twitter pages and to learn more on my website.

I also hope you’ll take a moment to learn more about the common-sense health care solutions that I support.

← Older posts

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 771,789 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

 

Loading Comments...