• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Tag Archives: Supreme Court

Your Bible is not our Constitution

14 Saturday May 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in Resist, social media

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

abortion, missouri, right wingnut, Roe v Wade, self righteous, social media, Supreme Court, Twitter, Vicky Hartzler

Vicky Hartzler (r) [2021 file photo].

Yesterday morning:

Rep. Vicky Hartzler @RepHartzler
Praying for #SCOTUS this morning — for protection for the justices and that righteous decisions will be made.
[….]
8:23 AM · May 13, 2022

Don’t fence us out.

Some of the responses:

Pray that these justices remember their words from when they were being considered for their current positions, that stare decisis had real meaning to them.

I think you meant self righteous.

Correction… Self Righteous… your views and opinions are no more morally superior than mine.

You wouldn’t know righteousness if it slapped the hypocrisy out of you.

Previously:

McCullen v Coakley (2014) gently weeps (May 5, 2022)

“You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.”

11 Wednesday May 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in Josh Hawley, US Senate

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

abortion, Fascist pig, Josh Hawley, right wingnut, Roe v Wade, social media, Supreme Court, Twitter, U.S. Senate, Virginia

Dumbass.

Josh Hawley (r) [2016 file photo].

This afternoon:

Josh Hawley @HawleyMO
The Democrats’ radical pro-abortion bill would disenfranchise every voter in Missouri, overturn our state laws – and give the power to DC Democrats
2:30 PM · May 11, 2022

Every?

As usual, there is much hilarity in the responses:

So all women in your state are pro life 100%? I find that very hard to believe.

So do they.

Senator Hawley abortion care is part of women’s health care so if you oppose abortion access than you are for restricting women’s health care which would relegate women to second class citizens.

You would know something about “disenfranchise (ing) voters”, huh?! But in this case, Repubs are attempting to ignore the will of 70% of the population. A true representative of the people (district &/or state) would LISTEN to the people they represent & vote accordingly.

Reality is it allows women simply to maintain the rights our grandma’s had.

Our daughters/grands will die when go to hospital unexpectedly, require abortion type procedure to save their life but it’s unavailable due to politics. 1000’s of women will die.

Yes, the point of rights is that they can’t be taken away by a majority that wants to hurt some people.

How do you claim to be a “Constitutional lawyer” without knowing any of the basics?

#ResignHawley

And if they can’t be taken away by a majority, they certainly shouldn’t be taken away by a small but vocal minority.

Maybe your laws should stay the fuck out of women’s bodies?

Hawley and his DC GOP colleagues are putting lives of pregnant people in jeopardy b/c they think it will keep them in power. If you continue to elect them you are taking away the right of your sister, spouse, daughter, nieces, neighbors to access healthcare.

Hard to believe Hawley is an Ivy league graduate. Does he not take polls of voters? I live in MO and am pro-choice.

Keep abortion legal, Hawley.

How Josh.
Don’t just say something.
Show Me

As I recall, every voter in Missouri was disenfranchised when the state legislature struck down TWO Constitutional amendments voted by the PEOPLE of Missouri to draw legitimate voting districts and keeping dark money out of politics

How would you know what Missouri voters want? Book tours, promoting candidates in other states, going to conferences in other states and going on media shows to express your disapproval of anything that Democrats suggest. Josh Hawley, Senator from anywhere but Missouri!

The bill is neither “radical” or “pro-abortion”, but it will sustain the freedoms women have known since 1973.

“Radical pro-abortion bill” in Hawley speak being “a bill that would allow women to make their own healthcare decisions without busybody, white and overwhelmingly male Republicans having a say”

STOP. I am a Missourian and you dont even come close to speaking for me.

No it will give women the power to make their own choices

This makes no sense

“Dear America, Sorry about Josh Hawley, Sincerely, Missouri”

You don’t even live in Missouri, Josh.

No it gives women the power over their own bodies. No uterus, no opinion!

How does having rights disenfranchise me? I’ll need you to explain it.

You don’t live in Missouri.

Do you live in Missouri?

How would it disenfranchise every MO voter? I’m pretty sure the whole state doesn’t vote the same way you do.

Says the man whose residence is in Virginia.

I am one of your constituents and I vehemently disagree with you. It’s a woman’s right to choose, not yours.

What exactly do you get paid to do?

Virginian says what?

You don’t even live in MO. What do you care?

Maybe you should try living here and then you can talk about us like you know anything

How does it disenfranchise anyone? And how would it overturn your state laws? As of now, abortion is still legal. And you are still a traitor.

Missouri women may want a word with you

In Missouri on Sunday:

“Pro-choice mom”

Previously:

Stare decisis don’t mean shit (May 2, 2022)

Into the streets (May 2, 2022)

Gleeful handwringing (May 3, 2022)

It’s the GOP’s world, now you just get to live in it (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 2 (May 3, 2022)

A statement (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 3 (May 3, 2022)

BREAKING NEWS: Pearl-clutcher clutches pearls (May 3, 2022)

Heartland POD: SCOTUS Abortion Case (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 4 (May 4, 2022)

Into the streets, part 5 (May 5, 2022)

McCullen v Coakley (2014) gently weeps (May 5, 2022)

Pro-choice demonstration in Warrensburg, Missouri – May 6, 2022 (May 6, 2022)

Pro-choice demonstration in Warrensburg, Missouri – May 6, 2022, part 2 (May 7, 2022)

Pro-choice demonstration in Kansas City, Missouri – May 8, 2022 (May 8, 2022)

Pro-choice demonstration in Kansas City, Missouri – May 8, 2022, part 2 (May 9, 2022)

Civility (May 9, 2022)

“It’s a trap!” (May 11, 2022)

“It’s a trap!”

11 Wednesday May 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in Josh Hawley, social media, US Senate

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

#resist, abortion, Josh Hawley, protest, right wingnut, Roe v Wade, social media, Supreme Court, Twitter, Virginia

Josh Hawley (r) [2016 file photo].

Yesterday:

Kcdotlawyer @aimeetheatty
If we were going to protest in front of Josh Hawley’s house, where would we go? Virginia?
7:48 AM · May 10, 2022

If they set up a bank of mics outside he wouldn’t be able to resist.

“The most dangerous place to stand in Washington D.C. is any place between Senator Josh Hawley and a live microphone” – Charles P. Pierce

Previously:

Stare decisis don’t mean shit (May 2, 2022)

Into the streets (May 2, 2022)

Gleeful handwringing (May 3, 2022)

It’s the GOP’s world, now you just get to live in it (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 2 (May 3, 2022)

A statement (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 3 (May 3, 2022)

BREAKING NEWS: Pearl-clutcher clutches pearls (May 3, 2022)

Heartland POD: SCOTUS Abortion Case (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 4 (May 4, 2022)

Into the streets, part 5 (May 5, 2022)

McCullen v Coakley (2014) gently weeps (May 5, 2022)

Pro-choice demonstration in Warrensburg, Missouri – May 6, 2022 (May 6, 2022)

Pro-choice demonstration in Warrensburg, Missouri – May 6, 2022, part 2 (May 7, 2022)

Pro-choice demonstration in Kansas City, Missouri – May 8, 2022 (May 8, 2022)

Pro-choice demonstration in Kansas City, Missouri – May 8, 2022, part 2 (May 9, 2022)

Civility (May 9, 2022)

Civility

09 Monday May 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

abortion, Kansas City, missouri, protest, Roe v Wade, Supreme Court

Late on Monday night a week ago an extensive U.S. Supreme Court draft majority opinion by Samuel Alito was leaked indicating the court will reverse Roe v Wade (1973). On Tuesday the Supreme Court confirmed that the document was authentic.

Yesterday in Kansas City several hundred pro-choice demonstrators gathered at Mill Creek Park for a rally and picketing.

At one point early in the demonstration one individual approached from the north in the park.

https://showmeprogress.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/AntiChoiceCounterProtesterKCMO050822.mp3

…Someone never fails to make that mistake – berating a large gathering of pissed off women. They didn’t back down. Which seemed to upset him even more…

The audio is from a digital audio recorder via a lavalier microphone. Wind noise, street sounds, and the camera shutter are also audible in the recording.

Previously:

Stare decisis don’t mean shit (May 2, 2022)

Into the streets (May 2, 2022)

Gleeful handwringing (May 3, 2022)

It’s the GOP’s world, now you just get to live in it (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 2 (May 3, 2022)

A statement (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 3 (May 3, 2022)

BREAKING NEWS: Pearl-clutcher clutches pearls (May 3, 2022)

Heartland POD: SCOTUS Abortion Case (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 4 (May 4, 2022)

Into the streets, part 5 (May 5, 2022)

McCullen v Coakley (2014) gently weeps (May 5, 2022)

Pro-choice demonstration in Warrensburg, Missouri – May 6, 2022 (May 6, 2022)

Pro-choice demonstration in Warrensburg, Missouri – May 6, 2022, part 2 (May 7, 2022)

Pro-choice demonstration in Kansas City, Missouri – May 8, 2022 (May 8, 2022)

Pro-choice demonstration in Kansas City, Missouri – May 8, 2022, part 2 (May 9, 2022)

Pro-choice demonstration in Kansas City, Missouri – May 8, 2022, part 2

09 Monday May 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in Resist

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

#resist, abortion, Kansas City, missouri, protest, Roe v Wade, Supreme Court

Late on Monday night a week ago an extensive U.S. Supreme Court draft majority opinion by Samuel Alito was leaked indicating the court will reverse Roe v Wade (1973). On Tuesday the Supreme Court confirmed that the document was authentic.

Yesterday in Kansas City several hundred pro-choice demonstrators gathered at Mill Creek Park for a rally and picketing.

Pro-choice demonstration in Kansas City, Missouri – May 8, 2022 (May 8, 2022)

More images:

“Our girls deserve a choice”

“I won’t carry his load”

“When I was seventeen”

“Keep your bans off my body”

Not your body, not your choice”

Roe vs Wade is only the beginning”

“Not the church, not the state…”

“We demand separation between vagina and state”

“Mommie dearest”

“Pro-choice mom”

“We won’t go back”

“Until”

“I am a woman, not a womb”

“Abort the Supreme Court”

“Never underestimate the power of a girl with a book”

“Dear America, Sorry about Josh Hawley, Sincerely, Missouri”

“We won’t go back”

Believe it.

Previously:

Stare decisis don’t mean shit (May 2, 2022)

Into the streets (May 2, 2022)

Gleeful handwringing (May 3, 2022)

It’s the GOP’s world, now you just get to live in it (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 2 (May 3, 2022)

A statement (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 3 (May 3, 2022)

BREAKING NEWS: Pearl-clutcher clutches pearls (May 3, 2022)

Heartland POD: SCOTUS Abortion Case (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 4 (May 4, 2022)

Into the streets, part 5 (May 5, 2022)

McCullen v Coakley (2014) gently weeps (May 5, 2022)

Pro-choice demonstration in Warrensburg, Missouri – May 6, 2022 (May 6, 2022)

Pro-choice demonstration in Warrensburg, Missouri – May 6, 2022, part 2 (May 7, 2022)

Pro-choice demonstration in Kansas City, Missouri – May 8, 2022 (May 8, 2022)

Pro-choice demonstration in Kansas City, Missouri – May 8, 2022

08 Sunday May 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in Resist

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

#resist, abortion, Kansas City, missouri, protest, Roe v Wade, Supreme Court

Late on Monday night an extensive U.S. Supreme Court draft majority opinion by Samuel Alito was leaked indicating the court will reverse Roe v Wade (1973). On Tuesday the Supreme Court confirmed that the document was authentic.

Today in Kansas City several hundred pro-choice demonstrators gathered at Mill Creek Park for a rally and picketing.

Support for the demonstrators from passing traffic came in the form of honking horns, raised arms and fists, and shouts of encouragement.

A very small anti-choice contingent (men, of course) showed up at various times during the demonstration.

The pro-choice demonstrators were diverse and came from many generations. They’re pissed off and activated. This is not going away.

“Now you’ve pissed off grandma”

“I’m a woman, not a womb”

Anti-choice mansplaining:

Someone never fails to make that mistake – berating a large gathering of pissed off women. They didn’t back down. Which seemed to upset him even more.

“I’m here for my grandchildren.”

“Keep your policies off my body”

“Up yours”
“Against abortion? Get a vasectomy”

“Mind your dick”

There were speakers.

Representative Emily Weber (d).

“Pro-life is a lie. You don’t care if people die”

“…I must demand that you stop trying to deny me the rights all people deserve”

“Abortion should be safe, legal, and easily accessible”

“Keep your filthy laws off my silky drawers”

“Get your own, then tell it what to do”

“Against abortion? Get a vasectomy”

“I will not be told what to do by a man who can’t even find the clitoris”

“Don’t tread on me”

“Fuck the patriarchy”

“Pro Roe”

“Our arms are tired off holding these signs since the 1960s”

“Girls just wanna have fundamental rights”

“No uterus, no opinion”

An interview with KCUR radio:

“Our moms and grandmas fought for this”

“You are fucking with the wrong generation”

“No country for old men”

Indeed.

Previously:

Stare decisis don’t mean shit (May 2, 2022)

Into the streets (May 2, 2022)

Gleeful handwringing (May 3, 2022)

It’s the GOP’s world, now you just get to live in it (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 2 (May 3, 2022)

A statement (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 3 (May 3, 2022)

BREAKING NEWS: Pearl-clutcher clutches pearls (May 3, 2022)

Heartland POD: SCOTUS Abortion Case (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 4 (May 4, 2022)

Into the streets, part 5 (May 5, 2022)

McCullen v Coakley (2014) gently weeps (May 5, 2022)

Pro-choice demonstration in Warrensburg, Missouri – May 6, 2022 (May 6, 2022)

Pro-choice demonstration in Warrensburg, Missouri – May 6, 2022, part 2 (May 7, 2022)

Pro-choice demonstration in Warrensburg, Missouri – May 6, 2022

06 Friday May 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in Resist

≈ 7 Comments

Tags

#resist, abortion, missouri, protest, Roe v Wade, Supreme Court, Warrensburg

From 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. today a grassroots pro-choice demonstration, organized online and by word of mouth, took place on the Johnson County Courthouse lawn in downtown Warrensburg. Over 100 individuals participated. There was a constant law enforcement presence. Most passing traffic signaled their support by honking their car horns. A few anti-choice individuals shouted what appeared to be unintelligible talking points which were usually meet with sharp retorts.

This was a much younger crowd and mostly female. They are awake and motivated. It would be a big mistake to ignore or discount their activism.

They were fearless.

Woman’s rights are human rights”

“Keep your bans off my body”
“Not your body? Not your conversation”

“…trying to decipher what your little mythical book has to say about these very real political issues…”

“None of your business”

“If my uterus shot bullets…”

“This is not a surgical instrument”

“My body is not your political playground”

“Why does every woman know another woman that was raped, but no man knows a rapist”

“This land is my land”

Several large trucks trolled the demonstration with drive-bys. One truck, with a barely readable sign (“abortion is murder”) and a defaced American flag trailing from its bed made several passes over the course of the demonstration. The occupants were greeted with jeers and shouts about compensation.

“If my uterus shot bullets the government wouldn’t regulate it”

“Why am I fighting for the same rights my grandma fought for”

“Pro-choice is pro-women”

“Break up with your sexist boyfriends”

Two anti-choice counter-protesters across the street were met with a constant stream of heckling.

“I’m with stupid”

“Keep your laws off my fucking womb”

“You do not get to make my choice for my future”

“Abortion is health care”

Observing from across the street:

Keep your politics out of my uterus”

“Keep your politics out of my uterus”

“Keep your laws off my body”

After pro-choice demonstrators took over the northeast corner the two anti-choice protesters, one with an unreadable sign (“baby lives matter” – come on, can’t they think of anything else?), crossed to the southeast corner to stand next to the police. Two pro-choice protestors crossed to the same corner. A police officer tried to move them back across the street. They refused to move (it’s a public sidewalk) and the main body of pro-choice demonstrators on the courthouse sidewalk jeered and shouted from across the street. The police officer eventually relented.

“Protect women’s rights”

“Don’t let men make laws about a woman’s body”

“My body, my choice”

After 6:00 p.m. the remaining demonstrators marched down the sidewalk toward the University of Central Missouri campus.

Previously:

Stare decisis don’t mean shit (May 2, 2022)

Into the streets (May 2, 2022)

Gleeful handwringing (May 3, 2022)

It’s the GOP’s world, now you just get to live in it (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 2 (May 3, 2022)

A statement (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 3 (May 3, 2022)

BREAKING NEWS: Pearl-clutcher clutches pearls (May 3, 2022)

Heartland POD: SCOTUS Abortion Case (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 4 (May 4, 2022)

Into the streets, part 5 (May 5, 2022)

McCullen v Coakley (2014) gently weeps (May 5, 2022)

McCullen v Coakley (2014) gently weeps

05 Thursday May 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

abortion, First Amendment, Hypocrisy, protest, Roe v Wade, snowflakes, Supreme Court

From the U.S. Supreme Court in 2014:

[….]
In 2007, Massachusetts amended its Reproductive Health Care Facilities Act, which had been enacted in 2000 to address clashes between abortion opponents and advocates of abortion rights outside clinics where abortions were performed. The amended version of the Act makes it a crime to knowingly stand on a “public way or sidewalk” within 35 feet of an entrance or driveway to any “reproductive health care facility,” defined as “a place, other than within or upon the grounds of a hospital, where abortions are offered or performed.”

[….]

Chief Justice Roberts delivered the opinion of the Court.

 A Massachusetts statute makes it a crime to knowingly stand on a “public way or sidewalk” within 35 feet of an entrance or driveway to any place, other than a hospital, where abortions are performed. Mass. Gen. Laws, ch. 266, §§120E½(a), (b) (West 2012). Petitioners are individuals who approach and talk to women outside such facilities, attempting to dissuade them from having abortions. The statute prevents petitioners from doing so near the facilities’ entrances. The question presented is whether the statute violates the First Amendment.

[….]

Petitioners wish to converse with their fellow citizens about an important subject on the public streets and sidewalks—sites that have hosted discussions about the issues of the day throughout history. Respondents assert undeniably significant interests in maintaining public safety on those same streets and sidewalks, as well as in preserving access to adjacent healthcare facilities. But here the Commonwealth has pursued those interests by the extreme step of closing a substantial portion of a traditional public forum to all speakers. It has done so without seriously addressing the problem through alternatives that leave the forum open for its time-honored purposes. The Commonwealth may not do that consistent with the First Amendment.

 The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

It is so ordered.

Today, at the United States Supreme Court:

ABC News @ABC
A new, imposing eight-foot-high fence was erected overnight at the U.S. Supreme Court in the wake of protests over a bombshell draft opinion on abortion.
[….]
1:16 PM · May 5, 2022

Apparently the First Amendment doesn’t apply.

“…Petitioners wish to converse with their fellow citizens about an important subject on the public streets and sidewalks—sites that have hosted discussions about the issues of the day throughout history…”

“…by the extreme step of closing a substantial portion of a traditional public forum to all speakers. It has done so without seriously addressing the problem through alternatives that leave the forum open for its time-honored purposes…”

Apparently the First Amendment doesn’t apply to criticism of the Supreme Court. Snowflakes.

“Choice is Freedom”

Previously:

Stare decisis don’t mean shit (May 2, 2022)

Into the streets (May 2, 2022)

Gleeful handwringing (May 3, 2022)

It’s the GOP’s world, now you just get to live in it (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 2 (May 3, 2022)

A statement (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 3 (May 3, 2022)

BREAKING NEWS: Pearl-clutcher clutches pearls (May 3, 2022)

Heartland POD: SCOTUS Abortion Case (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 4 (May 4, 2022)

Into the streets, part 5 (May 5, 2022)

Into the streets, part 5

05 Thursday May 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

abortion, protest, Roe v Wade, Supreme Court

Late on Monday night an extensive U.S. Supreme Court draft majority opinion by Samuel Alito was leaked indicating the court will reverse Roe v Wade (1973). On Tuesday the Supreme Court confirmed that the document was authentic.

“Oppression is so 1972”

The time is now.

Welcome to 21st Century America.

Previously:

Stare decisis don’t mean shit (May 2, 2022)

Into the streets (May 2, 2022)

Gleeful handwringing (May 3, 2022)

It’s the GOP’s world, now you just get to live in it (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 2 (May 3, 2022)

A statement (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 3 (May 3, 2022)

BREAKING NEWS: Pearl-clutcher clutches pearls (May 3, 2022)

Heartland POD: SCOTUS Abortion Case (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 4 (May 5, 2022)

Into the streets, part 4

04 Wednesday May 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

abortion, protest, Roe v Wade, Supreme Court

Late on Monday night an extensive U.S. Supreme Court draft majority opinion by Samuel Alito was leaked indicating the court will reverse Roe v Wade (1973). Yesterday the Supreme Court confirmed that the document was authentic.

“Girls just wanna have fundamental rights”

Previously:

Stare decisis don’t mean shit (May 2, 2022)

Into the streets (May 2, 2022)

Gleeful handwringing (May 3, 2022)

It’s the GOP’s world, now you just get to live in it (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 2 (May 3, 2022)

A statement (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 3 (May 3, 2022)

BREAKING NEWS: Pearl-clutcher clutches pearls (May 3, 2022)

Heartland POD: SCOTUS Abortion Case (May 3, 2022)

← Older posts

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Democratic Party News
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Josh Hawley
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 581,158 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

 

Loading Comments...