Today at the Missouri Ethics Commission:
221843 06/10/2022 Missouri Conservative Alliance Laborers Local 660 PAC 2633 West Clay St Charles MO 63301 6/9/2022 $15,000.00
[emphasis added]
Solidarity? Never heard of it.
10 Friday Jun 2022
Posted campaign finance
inToday at the Missouri Ethics Commission:
221843 06/10/2022 Missouri Conservative Alliance Laborers Local 660 PAC 2633 West Clay St Charles MO 63301 6/9/2022 $15,000.00
[emphasis added]
Solidarity? Never heard of it.
01 Sunday May 2022
Posted Uncategorized
inTags
Eight hours for work, eight hours for rest, eight hours for what we will.
06 Monday Sep 2021
Posted social media
inToday, without any understanding:
Rep. Vicky Hartzler @RepHartzler
Wishing all of Missouri a safe and happy #LaborDay!
[….]
Yeah, working people.
Some of the responses:
Reminder: @RepHartzler had a chance to make ACA more affordable for her voters. She didn’t.
Had a chance to CUT IN HALF 17% child poverty in MO04. Didn’t.
Had a chance to refund cops, EMTs in towns ravaged by Covid. Didn’t.
To assure each family member a $1400 check. She didn’t.
[….]
Why? You don’t care about the working people’s unions that brought Labor Day into being. Your votes tell us so.
Thank s union not Right to work politicians like you.
Right to get paid less.
Hypocrite. Your tweet should have said “thank a Union”.
Well, yeah.
03 Friday Sep 2021
Posted campaign finance
inYesterday at the Missouri Ethics Commission:
C211659 09/02/2021 United We Stand PAC CHIPP POLITICAL ACCOUNT 1401 HAMPTON AVE SAINT LOUIS MO 63139 9/1/2021 $50,000.00
C180584 09/02/2021 UFCW Active Ballot Club-Missouri Federal Committee United Food and Commercial Workers International Union Active Ballot Club 1775 K ST, NW Washington DC 20006 9/2/2021 $10,000.00
We’re gonna need a bigger boat.
01 Tuesday Jun 2021
Posted Missouri General Assembly
inTags
anti-labor, General Assembly, HB 1413, missouri, Missouri Supreme Court, opinion, organized labor, severability
Today, from the Missouri Supreme Court:
“The exemption of public safety labor organizations violates principles of equal protection. The exemption of public safety labor organizations permeates throughout HB 1413 and reaches all provisions. The operation of this exemption forces this Court to declare HB 1413 void in its entirety rather than sever the offending provision. The circuit court’s judgment is affirmed.”
Void. In. Its. Entirety.
In 2018 HB 1413 was introduced as this:
HB 1413 — LABOR ORGANIZATIONS [pdf]
SPONSOR: TaylorThis bill prohibits any sum from being withheld from the earnings of a public employee for the payment of any portion of dues, agency shop fees, or other fees paid by public employee members of a public labor organization or a public employee who is a nonmember except upon the annual written or electronic authorization of the employee.
A public labor organization is prohibited from using or obtaining any portion of dues, agency shop fees, or any other fees paid by member and nonmember public employees to make political campaign contributions or expenditures unless it obtains a written or electronic authorization from the member or nonmember within the previous 12 months.
Failure to provide any written or electronic authorization shall not be a condition of employment.
This bill further requires public labor organizations to maintain financial records, identical to those required by federal law (29 U.S.C. 431(b)), for no less than five years. Each report required under this section must be made available to employees in a searchable electronic format. If a public labor organization fails to make the reports available to an employee, that employee will have a cause of action against the organization.
This bill is the same as HB 251 (2017).
And it morphed and was approved as this:
SS#2 SCS HB 1413 — LABOR ORGANIZATIONS [pdf]
This bill makes various changes to the laws regarding public employees, public employee labor organizations, and labor agreements between those labor organizations and public bodies. However, public safety labor organizations, and employees of the Department of Corrections are exempted from the bill’s provisions (Section 105.503, RSMo).
The bill provides that no sum shall be withheld from a public employee’s earnings to pay dues or other fees to a public labor organization without annual authorization. Labor organizations are required to maintain financial records substantially similar to federal law, and must make the records available to employees in a searchable electronic format (Section 105.505).
The bill requires labor organizations to adopt a constitution and bylaws and file a copy with the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations, along with a report containing specified information about the organization. Labor organizations are also required to annually file a report detailing the organization’s financial condition and operations. The financial report shall be in an electronic, readily accessible format available to its members (Section 105.533).
This bill requires every officer and employee of a labor organization to annually file a report listing any legal or equitable interest, income, or transaction the person, his or her spouse, or minor child received or derived from a labor organization or public body with employees that the labor organization represents or is seeking to represent (Section105.535).
The reports and documents filed with the department under the provisions of this bill are public records. The department must allow for the inspection and examination of the reports and documents, as specified in the bill, and furnish copies upon payment of the service (Section 105.540).
Each person required to file a report shall maintain, for at least five years, sufficient records to verify the information contained in the report. Each labor organization shall file a report within 90 days of becoming subject to the provisions of this bill, and people required to file reports shall file such reports within 90 days after the end of each fiscal year (Sections 105.545 and 105.550).
Any person who knowingly violates certain provisions of the bill related to the required reports or files a false report is subject to a fine or imprisonment of not more than a year (Section 105.555).
The bill provides that supervisory public employees, as defined in the bill, shall not be included in the same bargaining unit as the public employees they supervise and that the same labor organization shall not represent both non-supervisory and supervisory public employees (Section 105.570).
Recognition may only be obtained by a labor organization through an election before the State Board of Mediation. Voluntary recognition by a public body is prohibited. An election by secret ballot will be held after the board is presented with cards containing signatures of at least 30% of the employees in the bargaining unit.
The bill specifies the ballot language to be used for the selection of a labor organization as the exclusive representative for the bargaining unit. More than 50% of all public employees within the bargaining unit must vote positively to certify the labor organization as the exclusive representative. However, public employees of the bargaining unit may seek to decertify the labor organization at any time with a subsequent election provided that the board is presented with signed cards representing at least 30% of the employees in the bargaining unit. If more than 50% of the bargaining unit votes to decertify the labor organization then it shall no longer be recognized as the exclusive representative.
Labor organizations must be recertified every three years. No more than one election shall take place in any bargaining unit within a 12-month period. The board shall collect a fee from each labor organization participating in an election (Section 105.575).
Within eight weeks of a certification election, the labor organization shall meet and begin bargaining with representatives of the public body. No labor organization shall refuse to meet with the representatives of the public body.
Bargaining for renewal agreements shall take place triennially, provided that those labor agreements must be subject to certain limitations. Such limitations include management reserving the right to hire, discipline, and discharge employees; reserving the right to make and amend reasonable work rules; prohibiting all strikes and picketing; extending the duty of fair representation to all employees of the bargaining unit; prohibiting labor
organization employees from accepting paid time by a public body for conducting labor organization business with certain exceptions; and providing for the modification of the agreement in the event of a budget shortfall (Sections 105.580 and 105.585).A labor organization, or associated representative, or public body, or associated representative, that violates the provisions of this bill is subject to a civil action for appropriate relief, including injunctive relief. Attorneys’ fees shall be awarded for the enforcement of the provisions of this bill (Section 105.595).
The provisions of the bill shall apply to personal care attendants and their labor organizations, as well as all officers and employees of such organizations (Section 208.862)
Ah, piling on.
The Missouri Supreme Court today:
…The State’s argument in favor of severance of the exemption is illogical in that the result would make public labor law reform applicable to public safety labor organizations, which the legislature specifically excluded. The exemption is not concerned with a singular provision or aspect of the bill; rather, it provides an exemption from the overall statutory scheme itself, which consists of approximately 20 sections. Even without giving weight to the late addition of the exemption in the legislative process, this Court refuses to sever the exemption and make this public labor reform law applicable to public safety labor organizations when the legislature contemplated this application and intentionally crafted section 105.503.2(1) to avoid such an outcome…
The anti-labor right wingnuts in the General Assembly were just too clever.
…This Court cannot say the legislature would have enacted the valid provisions of HB 1413 without this void one. If the legislature desired to pass a scheme imposing reform provisions to all public labor organizations, it had the opportunity to do so. But it did not; it specifically provided the reform provisions would not apply to public safety labor organizations. This Court will not, by severance, leave in place legislation contrary to the legislature’s intent. By its plain language, section 105.503.2(1) is essentially and inseparably connected with all other provisions of HB 1413; therefore, HB 1413 must be declared void in its entirety…
Yep, the General Assembly was trying to be much too clever.
So, organized labor organizations are organized labor organizations. Do you wonder why that “exemption” existed in the first place?
Severability is a double edged sword.
20 Tuesday Oct 2020
Posted campaign finance
inYesterday at the Missouri Ethics Commission for a PAC supported by organized labor:
C201150 10/19/2020 Protect Missouri Freedom Purple PAC 8141 King George Ct Manchester MO 63021 10/19/2020 $100,000.00
C201150 10/19/2020 Protect Missouri Freedom United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, AFL-CIO Active Ballot Club – Missouri 1775 K St NW Washington DC 20006 10/19/2020 $125,000.00
What are they spending money on? [October 15 MEC report]:
Opposed to these republican candidates [October 15 MEC report]:
That’s quite a gallery.
30 Sunday Aug 2020
Posted campaign finance
inYesterday at the Missouri Ethics Commission, from organized labor for the House Democratic Campaign Committee {HDCC):
C171047 08/29/2020 House Democratic Campaign Committee Sheet Metal Workers Local No 36 Voluntary Political Fund 2319 Chouteau Ave Ste 100 St Louis MO 63103 8/27/2020 $100,000.00
[emphasis added]
They know.
22 Saturday Aug 2020
Posted campaign finance
inTags
A Stronger Missouri, governor, Mike Parson, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, organized labor, PAC
Today at the Missouri Ethics Commission for a PAC opposed to Governor Mike Parson (r):
C201352 08/22/2020 A Stronger Missouri Keep Government Accountable PO Box 414435 Kansas City MO 64141 8/20/2020 $500,000.00
[emphasis added]
In the last ten days, from working people:
C171375 08/12/2020 Keep Government Accountable CWA COPE MISSOURI 501 3RD ST NW WASHINGTON DC 20001 8/12/2020 $50,000.00
C171375 08/13/2020 Keep Government Accountable MISSOURI DRIVE FUND 1850 E DIVISION ST SPRINGFIELD MO 65803 8/12/2020 $100,000.00
C171375 08/18/2020 Keep Government Accountable MISSOURI AND KANSAS LABORERS PAC 3450 HOLLENBERG DR BRIDGETON MO 63044 8/18/2020 $150,000.00
C171375 08/18/2020 Keep Government Accountable MIDWEST REGION LABORERS POLITICAL LEAGUE EDUCATION FUND 3450 HOLLENBERG DR BRIDGETON MO 63044 8/18/2020 $100,000.00
C171375 08/20/2020 Keep Government Accountable IUOE LOCAL 513 POLITICAL AND EDUCATION FUND 3449 HOLLENBERG DR BRIDGETON MO 63044 8/20/2020 $10,000.00
Sad.
21 Friday Aug 2020
Posted campaign finance
inYesterday at the Missouri Ethics Commission for the HDCC:
C171047 08/20/2020 House Democratic Campaign Committee International Union of Painters and Allied Trades PAT federal PAC 7234 Parkway Drive Hanover MD 21076 8/20/2020 $50,000.00
[emphasis added]
On behalf of working people. Every little bit helps.
20 Thursday Aug 2020
Posted campaign finance
inToday at the Missouri Ethics Commission:
C000566 08/20/2020 SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL NO 36 VOLUNTARY POLITICAL FUND SMART PAL 1750 New York Ave Washington DC 20006 8/20/2020 $100,000.00
[emphasis added]
That’ll work.