• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Tag Archives: IOKIYAR

Josh Hawley (r): you brought up planes

20 Saturday Oct 2018

Posted by Michael Bersin in Claire McCaskill, US Senate

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

air travel, campaign finance, FEC, Federal Election Commission, general aviation, Hypocrisy, IOKIYAR, Josh Hawley, lobbyist, missouri, Travis Brown, U.S.Senate

Another sad chapter in the annals of IOKIYAR*.

Josh Hawley (r) [2016 file photo].

Air wars: Hawley flies on lobbyist’s plane after blasting McCaskill
Missouri’s Senate candidates duke it out over whose flights are more unsavory.
By BURGESS EVERETT and ELANA SCHOR 10/20/2018 09:45 AM EDT

Sure enough, we went directly to Josh Hawley’s (r) October 2018 Federal Election Commission [FEC] campaign finance report and there it is:

Travis Brown and Kelly Brown each contributed $2612.50, in kind, dated September 24, 2018 to Josh Hawley’s (r) U.S. Senate campaign. The memo on the contribution report states: “In Kind: Air Charter 9-20-18”

Well, slap my face and call me a republican lobbyist, I’d never consider such a thing possible, given Josh Hawley’s, you know, lack of insider contacts and his apparent aversion to air travel.

Gee, they’re both “self employed” in the “government relations” business. “Government relations” is FEC report talk for “lobbyist”. Charter plane flights not always included.

Travis Brown, Travis Brown…wait a minute, we’ve run into that name before. At the Missouri Ethics Commision [lobbying search]:

Principal: PELOPIDAS, LLC 1034 S. BRENTWOOD BLVD, STE 1700 SAINT LOUIS , MO 63117 […]
Lobbyist: Travis Brown 1034 S. Brentwood Blvd, Ste 1700 Saint Louis , MO 63117 […]

Why, that’s the same address listed for the in-kind contributions to Josh Hawley (r) in the FEC report. Go figure.

It’s not like a lobbyist’s plane hasn’t been an issue in the past:

Today’s Republican Floor Leader co-owns plane with Lobbyist story is (January 16, 2009)

A Plane, a Business, a Representative, and a Lobbyist (January 18, 2009)

A Plane, a Business, a Representative, and a Lobbyist, part 2 (January 19, 2009)

A Plane, a Business, a Representative, and a Lobbyist, part 3 (January 22, 2009)

It’s plane what isn’t going to happen this year when it comes to ethics reform in Jefferson City (December 31, 2009)

We’re fairly certain this is not the aircraft in question – we couldn’t find the registration number on it.

Though it does make an apt metaphor for the blatant hypocrisy inherent in Josh Hawley’s (r) campaign rhetoric.

The more things change, the more they remain the same, and the very same republicans show up with their plane.

* it’s okay if you’re a republican

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): being a situational moral scold is as easy as pie

07 Sunday Oct 2018

Posted by Michael Bersin in social media

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

4th Congressional District, Brett Kavanaugh, IOKIYAR, missouri, right wingnut hypocrisy, social media, Twitter, U.S. Sureme Court, Vicky Hartzler

IOKIYAR*.

Yesterday evening, from Representative Vicky Hartzler (r):

Rep. Vicky Hartzler @RepHartzler
The Senate has done its due diligence in investigating Judge Kavanaugh, and they have found no evidence against him. Furthermore, this was turned into an embarrassing display of partisan vitriol. I support his confirmation and am pleased the Senate has acted accordingly.
4:03 PM – 6 Oct 2018 from Washington, DC

Some of the responses:

Weird how you were silent while the same Senate ignored the lawful nomination of Merrick Garland. Kind of like how you were silent while Trump was caging children and tearing families apart.

You make astonishingly immoral decisions, Congresswoman.

I cannot wait to vote for your opponent, and I’m hoping and praying there are many more like me that are disgusted with the GOP’s gross misuse of power. I voted you in to office, but you have proven that to be a mistake. #VoteBlue

My 3 week old could do a more thorough investigation than the FBI

Care to tell us why money was borrowed from China for your farm bill?

Incomplete investigation.

Get out and vote!

Your opinion won’t matter after you are voted out. Hope you enjoyed your time

I hope she didn’t enjoy it.

And won’t enjoy it after, when she’s scorned for life for being complicit in the criminal corrupt Trump regime.

You sold out your soul to the Republicans and now you are trying to invoke the moral high ground? Women like you make me feel ashamed of my own gender.

I am your constituent, living in MO-04, You will be voted out on Nov 6th, SHAME on you for taking side of sexual predator.

Vicky, here’s hoping we get an actual investigation of Kavanaugh once congressional control changes. The man I saw freaking out on television should not be making such momentous decisions.

“Due diligence in investigating”? “Found no evidence”? You haven’t been paying attention, Vickster [….]

Oh shut it. This investigation is a sham and you are a smear on America

BULLSHIT!

“embarrassing display of partisan vitriol” You Say
This is so very much nicer then shit show.
But then I’v never been accused of being overly nice when reacting to an obvious shit show…

Fuck you!

That’s probably a vote against in November.

The GOP party of Vicky Hartzler, Roy pedophile Moore. Donald pussy grabber Trump. Gym I watched boys getting molested Jordan and now Brett sexual predator Kavanaugh. You hang with some great people Vicky.

* it’s okay if you’re a republican.

A simple question, really…

16 Thursday Jun 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Hypocrisy, IOKIYAR

…When is Senator David Vitter (r) going to resign?

Just asking.

The voters have spoken, except when when republicans don’t like what they have to say…

10 Wednesday Nov 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

campaign finance, General Assembly, IOKIYAR, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, Proposition B, republicans

So, the republicans in the Missouri General Assembly have really large majorities now. Any guesses for what’s on the agenda?

In the St. Louis Post-Dispatch:

Lawmakers aim to thwart the voters’ will

By The Editorial Board | Posted: Monday, November 8, 2010 9:00 pm

Just days after Missouri voters approved tough new restrictions on puppy mills, Missouri lawmakers are talking about amending or overturning them.

In most states, such contempt for voters would be shocking and surprising. In Missouri, it’s old hat.

Last May, seven months before voters had their say, rural legislators tried to preempt the vote by prohibiting citizen initiatives involving any aspect of agriculture. It was blatantly unconstitutional. But no fewer than five bills containing similar language were introduced.

Now that Proposition B, the so-called Puppy Mill Cruelty Prevention Act, has been approved, lawmakers are gearing up to override it….

And look who’s still getting money – yesterday, via the Missouri Ethics Commission:

CONTRIBUTION OF MORE THAN $5,000.00 RECEIVED BY ANY COMMITTEE FROM ANY SINGLE DONOR – TO BE FILED WITHIN 48 HOURS OF RECEIVING THE CONTRIBUTION

C101530 MISSOURIANS FOR ANIMAL CARE CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE [pdf] 11/9/2010

Missouri Soybean Association

[3337 Emerald Lane

Jefferson City MO 65109]

11/9/2010

$23,527.09

Missouri Farmers care PAC

[6236 W Cunningham] Dr

[Columbia MO 65202-9111]

11/8/2010

$5,078.95

[emphasis added][address insertions from the Missouri Ethics Commission summary report]

With an innocuous name like “Missourians for Animal Care” you’d think they’d have supported Proposition B. Nope.

Posted on Mon, Mar. 29, 2010

Agriculture, Humane Society agendas clash

By MATT CAMPBELL

Kansas City Star

…Agribusiness interests say the bill does nothing to boost enforcement and is a feint by the Humane Society to increase its leverage against big livestock.

“The dog-breeder issue is simply the beginning, we feel, of what can happen in the future with a broader agenda relating to agriculture,” said Estil Fretwell, spokesman for the Missouri Farm Bureau.

Agribusiness recently formed Missourians for Animal Care to fight the initiative. The chairman is the director of the Missouri Pork Association.

The Humane Society’s Pacelle said the puppy mill bill had nothing to do with livestock and that the industry used the same false argument about threats to farmers before Missourians approved a cockfighting ban in 1998….

[emphasis added]

The statewide vote:

Unofficial Election Returns

State of Missouri General Election  – November 2, 2010 General Election

Tuesday, November 02, 2010

Proposition B   Precincts Reporting 3411 of 3411

Yes 995,423 51.6%

No 934,591 48.4%

Total Votes   1,930,014

Again, from the Post-Dispatch article:

…He uses the fact that it failed in 100 of the state’s 114 counties as justification…

Uh, counties don’t get to vote, only people do. But corporate interests can spend an unlimited amount of money.

This has been another edition of *IOKIYAR

21 Friday Aug 2009

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

health care reform, IOKIYAR, irony impairment, wingnuttia

In today’s Kansas City Star:

…said her anger is real.

The Lee’s Summit resident fears Obama’s plans for health care reform won’t work, and she resents criticism of the town hall outbursts.

“I don’t remember criticism of the people shouting, ‘Thousands died, Bush lied,'” she said. “It was OK to demonize Bush, but when we’re talking about real policy issues, we mustn’t mention it…”

Lying to get us to a war in Iraq or to gin up Homeland Security alerts for partisan political gain before a national election weren’t “real policy issues”? It boggles the mind.

“…I don’t remember criticism of the people shouting, ‘Thousands died, Bush lied,’ she said….”

Matthews, Gingrich, Hannity, others seize on new bin Laden tape to discredit war critics

January 20, 2006 3:47 pm ET

…Several media figures have seized on Osama bin Laden’s newly released audiotape to denounce critics of the Bush administration’s conduct of the war in Iraq. Explicitly asserting comparisons between bin Laden and prominent war critics…

March 22, 2003, 5:57pm EST

ANTI-WAR PROTESTS CONTINUE WITH LARGE CROWDS IN N.Y

…Signs from the demonstrators supporting war read, “We Gave Peace a Chance and It Cost Us 9/11” and “Anti-War is Anti-American…”

And it goes on and on and on and on…

To quote a Congressman from Massachusetts: “On what planet do you spend most of your time?”

* it’s okay if you’re a republican

And you shall know them by their deafening silence

02 Thursday Jul 2009

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

flag, IOKIYAR, patriotism, right wingnut hypocrisy, Runner's World, Sarah Palin

Why is this an outrage, and this is not? Just asking.

I’m waiting to hear about the second from the same people who were outraged by the first. [crickets]

Photo of Sarah Palin by Brian Adams/Runner’s World – via Balloon Juice  (The actual photo at Runner’s World is here).

Uh, you’re supposed to drape the flag over yourself, not drape it on your bar stool and then lean on it.

Dating from 1993:

UNITED STATES CODE

TITLE 36

CHAPTER 10

§176. Respect for flag

No disrespect should be shown to the flag of the United States of America; the flag should not be dipped to any person or thing. Regimental colors, State flags, and organization or institutional flags are to be dipped as a mark of honor…

…(d) The flag should never be used as wearing apparel, bedding, or drapery. It should never be festooned, drawn back, nor up, in folds, but always allowed to fall free. Bunting of blue, white, and red, always arranged with the blue above, the white in the middle, and the red below, should be used for covering a speaker’s desk, draping the front of the platform, and for decoration in general….

Okay, Chapter 10, as iterated on the non-governmental site above, is not enforceable.

Because:

Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989)

…Especially pertinent to this case are our decisions recognizing the communicative nature of conduct relating to flags. Attaching a peace sign to the flag, Spence, supra, at 418 U.S. 409″]409-410; refusing to salute the flag, Barnette, 319 U.S. at 632; and displaying a red flag, 409-410; refusing to salute the flag, Barnette, 319 U.S. at 632; and displaying a red flag, Stromberg v. California, 283 U.S. 359, [p405] 368-369 (1931), we have held, all may find shelter under the First Amendment. See also Smith v. Goguen, 415 U.S. 566, 588 (1974) (WHITE, J., concurring in judgment) (treating flag “contemptuously” by wearing pants with small flag sewn into their seat is expressive conduct)…

And:

United States v. Eichman, 496 U.S. 310 (1990)

…Although the Flag Protection Act contains no explicit content-based limitation on the scope of prohibited conduct, it is nevertheless clear that the Government’s asserted interest is “related ‘to the suppression of free expression,'” 491 U.S. at 410, and concerned with the content of such expression. The Government’s interest in protecting the “physical integrity” [p316] of a privately owned flag [n5] rests upon a perceived need to preserve the flag’s status as a symbol of our Nation and certain national ideals. But the mere destruction or disfigurement of a particular physical manifestation of the symbol, without more, does not diminish or otherwise affect the symbol itself in any way. For example, the secret destruction of a flag in one’s own basement would not threaten the flag’s recognized meaning. Rather, the Government’s desire to preserve the flag as a symbol for certain national ideals is implicated “only when a person’s treatment of the flag communicates [a] message” to others that is inconsistent with those ideals. [n6] Ibid. [p317]…

…Even assuming such a consensus exists, any suggestion that the Government’s interest in suppressing speech becomes more weighty as popular opposition to that speech grows is foreign to the First Amendment…

[emphasis added]

Yeah, those are flag burning cases, but the big picture is that government can’t dictate behavior or any orthodoxy about what is “correct” patriotic behavior or speech. This is not a new phenomenon in America, either:

WEST VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION v. BARNETTE, 319 U.S. 624 (1943)

…If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein. If there are any circumstances which permit an exception, they do not now occur to us…

In a time of war, no less.

Ask yourself, what would the political right be saying if it was Barack Obama standing in that same pose instead of Sarah Palin?

So, it all comes down to the political right’s view of what is patriotic orthodoxy. At this point they’re definitely not consistent about it, either. We’ll just have to go with *IOKIYAR.

*it’s okay if you’re a republican

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Democratic Party News
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Josh Hawley
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 286,191 hits

Blog at WordPress.com.

Cancel