• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Tag Archives: special counsel

Still waiting for the appointment of Mike Pence’s (r) Special Counsel

02 Thursday Feb 2023

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

classified documents, hair helmet, Mike Pence, right wingnut, special counsel

28 CFR § 600.1 – Grounds for appointing a Special Counsel.

§ 600.1 Grounds for appointing a Special Counsel.
The Attorney General, or in cases in which the Attorney General is recused, the Acting Attorney General, will appoint a Special Counsel when he or she determines that criminal investigation of a person or matter is warranted and –

(a) That investigation or prosecution of that person or matter by a United States Attorney’s Office or litigating Division of the Department of Justice would present a conflict of interest for the Department or other extraordinary circumstances; and

(b) That under the circumstances, it would be in the public interest to appoint an outside Special Counsel to assume responsibility for the matter.

So, is Attorney General Merrick Garland going to appoint a Special Counsel? Just asking.

Previously:

Now what, Mark (r)? (January 24, 2023)

A very thorough search (January 24, 2023)

Really bad timing…again (January 25, 2023)

Former Missouri Attorneys General say what? *IOKIYAR?

26 Thursday Jan 2023

Posted by Michael Bersin in Eric Schmitt, Josh Hawley, social media, US Senate

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Bill Barr, Donald Trump, Eric Schmitt, Fascist pigs, financial crimes, IOKIYAR, Italy, Josh Hawley, missouri, right wingnuts, special counsel, U.S. Senate, Virginia

Nothing.

Mrs. Betty Bowers @BettyBowers
NYT reporting Bill Barr & John Durham got an inconvenient surprise in Italy.

BARR & DURHAM: “Did you have any role in starting the Trump/Russia investigation?”

ITALIAN OFFICIALS: “No, but we do have credible evidence of Trump’s financial crimes.”

Those crimes are still secret.
[….]

3:24 PM · Jan 26, 2023

“No, but we do have credible evidence of Trump’s financial crimes.”

Silence:

Josh Hawley (r) [2016 file photo].

Silence:

Eric Schmitt (r) [2021 file photo].

Eric Schmitt (r) [2021 file photo].

* it’s okay if you’re a republican

The Special Counsel always rings twice

18 Friday Nov 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Department of Justice, Donald Trump, Insurrection, Merrick Garland, national security, special counsel

…The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct the ongoing investigation into whether any person or entity violated the law in connection with efforts to interfere with the lawful transfer of power following the 2020 presidential election or the certification ofthe Electoral College vote held on or about January 6, 2021 , as well as any matters that arose or might arise directly from this investigation or that are within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a). This authorization does not apply to prosecutions that are currently pending in the District of Columbia, as well as future investigations and prosecutions of individuals for offenses they committed while physically present on the Capitol grounds on January 6, 2021. Those investigations and prosecutions remain under the authority of the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia. Further delineation ofthe authorizations between the Special Counsel and
the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia will be provided as necessary and appropriate…

…The Special Counsel is further authorized to conduct the ongoing investigation referenced and described in the United States’ Response to Motion for Judicial Oversight and Additional Relief, Donald J Trump v. United States, No. 9:22-CV-81294-AMC (S.D. Fla. Aug. 30, 2022) (ECF No. 48 at 5- 13), as well as any matters that arose or may arise directly from this investigation or that are within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a)…

USAG111822Order5559-2022

Bad combover. Check. Too long red tie. Check. Orange spray tan. Check. Tiny hands. Check. Cluelessness. Check…

Today at the Department of Justice:

Department of Justice
Office of Public Affairs FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Friday, November 18, 2022

Appointment of a Special Counsel

Attorney General Merrick B. Garland announced today the appointment of former career Justice Department prosecutor and former chief prosecutor for the special court in The Hague, Jack Smith, to serve as Special Counsel to oversee two ongoing criminal investigations. The first is the investigation, as described in court filings in the District of Columbia, into whether any person or entity unlawfully interfered with the transfer of power following the 2020 presidential election or the certification of the Electoral College vote held on or about January 6, 2021. The second is the ongoing investigation involving classified documents and other presidential records, as well as the possible obstruction of that investigation, referenced and described in court filings submitted in a pending matter in the Southern District of Florida.

“Based on recent developments, including the former President’s announcement that he is a candidate for President in the next election, and the sitting President’s stated intention to be a candidate as well, I have concluded that it is in the public interest to appoint a special counsel,” said Attorney General Garland. “Such an appointment underscores the Department’s commitment to both independence and accountability in particularly sensitive matters. It also allows prosecutors and agents to continue their work expeditiously, and to make decisions indisputably guided only by the facts and the law.”

The Attorney General also stated, “Although the Special Counsel will not be subject to the day-to-day supervision of any official of the Department, he must comply with the regulations, procedures, and policies of the Department. I will ensure that the Special Counsel receives the resources to conduct this work quickly and completely. Given the work done to date and Mr. Smith’s prosecutorial experience, I am confident that this appointment will not slow the completion of these investigations. The men and women who are pursuing these investigations are conducting themselves in accordance with the highest standards of professionalism. I could not be prouder of them. I strongly believe that the normal processes of this Department can handle all investigations with integrity. And I also believe that appointing a Special Counsel at this time is the right thing to do. The extraordinary circumstances presented here demand it. Mr. Smith is the right choice to complete these matters in an even-handed and urgent manner.”

Special Counsel Smith has resigned as the chief prosecutor for the special court in The Hague charged with investigating and adjudicating war crimes in Kosovo.

Attachment(s): Download 2022.11.18_order_5559-2022.pdf
Component(s): Office of the Attorney General
Press Release Number: 22-1237
Updated November 18, 2022

Attorney General Merrick B. Garland Delivers Remarks on the Appointment of a Special Counsel (November 18, 2022)

Statement of Special Counsel Jack Smith (November 18, 2022)

“…You know, there’s something about this that’s like… well, it’s like you’re expecting a letter that you’re just crazy to get, and you hang around the front door for fear you might not hear him ring. You never realize that he always rings twice….”

Chuck Todd is a babbling fool

25 Thursday Jul 2019

Posted by Michael Bersin in media criticism, social media

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Donald Trump, impeachment, media criticism, Robert Mueller, Russia, social media, special counsel, Twitter

A review, this morning:

Adam Serwer @AdamSerwer
Mueller testified that the president is an unprosecuted felon. His testimony however, lacked a compelling musical number.
4:21 AM · Jul 25, 2019

Some of the responses:

Mueller’s testimony did not meet standards of reality show dramatics and in turn, was a bust. Media is stuck on stupid when it comes to covering Trump presidency. Media and some in public wanted theatrical pronouncements of Trumps guilt. Because we didn’t get it, Mueller a dud

So, what does the educated & rational public do when the press has turned into an entertainment machine?

It’s total saturation. “Journalists” and reporters now do this as part of their DNA & most seem to have zero insight

The idea that all this needs to be reality TV is the most damning aspect of American culture

Previously:

What, me worry? (July 24, 2019)

What, me worry?

24 Wednesday Jul 2019

Posted by Michael Bersin in social media

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Congress, Donald Trump, hearings, Robert Mueller, social media, special counsel, Twitter

Somebody sounds nervous.

Bad combover. Check. Too long red tie. Check. Orange spray tan. Check. Tiny hands. Check. Cluelessness. Check…

Early this morning:

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump
It was NEVER agreed that Robert Mueller could use one of his many Democrat Never Trumper lawyers to sit next to him and help him with his answers. This was specifically NOT agreed to, and I would NEVER have agreed to it. The Greatest Witch Hunt in U.S. history, by far!
4:03 AM · Jul 24, 2019

Some of the comments:

Good thing you don’t seem nervous at all.

You don’t have to agree. It’s not up to you. See, Article 2 doesn’t give all the power you want.

We see what you did there.

You scared, Bro?

You sound scared.

Things you don’t say when you’re “totally exonerated”

[….]They don’t need your permission.

I don’t understand why Donald thinks he has a say in who can testify in Congress.

If you ever wondered what Richard Nixon would’ve tweeted in the middle of the Watergate hearings in Congress, Trump is giving you some examples. [….]

Strange, I thought you said he’d exonerated you…[….]

Turns out you don’t run the Congress. Who knew? (Fifth graders, they knew)

Why don’t you want to hear from the man who totally exonerated you?

You scared, bro? You seem scared.

Why would the SUBJECT of an investigation have any right to agree to who Congress brings in to testify about him.

That’s idiotic.

There you have it.

Why worry Donald, unless there is something to worry about. Is there anything to worry about?

You scared?
Yeah, you scared.

And:

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION!
4:55 AM · Jul 24, 2019

Pass the popcorn.

Previously:

Gaslighter, Racist, Fascist, Liar, Narcissist, Asshole (July 21, 2019)

Go ahead, hitch your little red wagon to that runaway freight train

01 Wednesday May 2019

Posted by Michael Bersin in Josh Hawley, social media, US Senate

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Donald Trump, Josh Hawley, missouri, Mueller Report, obstruction, Robert Mueller, social media, special counsel, Twitter, William Barr

Bad combover. Check. Too long red tie. Check. Orange spray tan. Check. Tiny hands. Check. Cluelessness. Check…

“Executive time” his morning:

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump
“The Democrats can’t come to grips with the fact that there was No Collusion, there was No Conspiracy, there was No Obstruction. What we should be focused on is what’s been going on in our government, at the highest levels of the FBI….” Senator Josh Hawley
5:36 AM – 1 May 2019

Josh Hawley [2016 file photo].

Michael Bersin @MBersin
On the somewhat brighter side when it comes to Congressional oversight – at least Missouri is represented by a U.S. Senator who has first hand experience with an Attorney General who obstructs and lies. Oh, wait…
6:16 AM – 1 May 2019

A runaway freight train to…

Rep. Jason Smith (r): predictable sycophant

22 Monday Apr 2019

Posted by Michael Bersin in social media

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

8th Congressional District, Donald Trump, Jason Smith, missouri, Mueller Report, obstruction of justice, Robert Mueller, social media, special counsel, Treason, Twitter

Last Thursday, from Representative Jason Smith (r):

Rep. Jason Smith @RepJasonSmith
Special Counsel Mueller’s report has delivered the final nail in the collusion coffin. Anyone who pushes the false collusion narrative after today is playing into Russian hands to divide our country and cast doubt on our elections. The case is closed; it’s time to move on.
4:54 PM – 18 Apr 2019

Thus spake Nathan Thurm.

Some of the responses:

I guess you didn’t read it.

Now that’s some quality spin right there

Not really. I don’t even think it’s a mediocre lie.

So, nothing to say about a lying Press Secretary, 10 possible obstruction charges, 12 other charges that have been out sourced, or a lying AG?

Trump on appointment of Mueller. “This is the end of my presidency. I’m fucked.” That’s the statement of an innocent man?

I’m still struggling to understand why 140 different contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia doesn’t both you. Why don’t you care that it’s been *proven* that they interfered? Do you love Trump *more* than America?

why all the lying? why hasn’t trump acknowledged the Russian interference and vowed to do something about it? do you suppose it’s because he couldn’t win without it? so many questions

I’m not surprised that you don’t know how to read.

Looks like a clear case of obstruction. Mueller in reports says he “can’t clear the president of obstruction,” and list 10 times he tried to.

Really Jason? Do your eyeballs not connect to your brain? Either you are just blind lying to your followers about the report, or you haven’t even skimmed the report. 10 different impeachable obstruction events are listed – only need 1.

Read the report you half-wit

You should probably take a moment and read it first. Then, you should take a moment to rewrite your stupid tweet.

I need to move to your district just to run against you. Your language alone is a disservice to your constituency.

You apparently didn’t read the report.

The investigation was never looking for “collusion” Bc that’s not a legal term.

But you are excellent at regurgitating talking points that your gullible, Fox-watching supporters are sure to lick up.

You clearly haven’t read it. take the time to soak it in. its just begun, trump is f*cked anyone who pushes the false narrative that it’s over and we must move on is enabling a con man

Move on?

F*ck no.

This is just getting started.

Your boy is an immoral, unpatriotic opportunist.

Really? It established that Russia interfered in our elections for the express purpose of electing Donald Trump. Trump did *nothing* to stop that, in fact, he *encouraged* it. He’s lied repeatedly to the American people. And you’re still his bitch, instead MOO8s.

Reading is fundamental.

Release the Mueller Report Protest – Kansas City – April 4, 2019

04 Thursday Apr 2019

Posted by Michael Bersin in Resist

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

#resist, Donald Trump, Kansas City, missouri, Mueller Report, Robert Mueller, Russia, special counsel, William Barr

Early this evening approximately fifty individuals showed up in Kansas City on the steps to the Liberty Memorial on Pershing facing Union Station to protest the continued suppression of the Mueller Report by Trump Administration Attorney General William Barr. This was one of hundreds of protests across the nation, organized on very short notice by a loose coalition of national activist groups.

Two Kansas City Police officers stood nearby.

“What are you hiding?”

“…the full report”

A flyby by a local network affiliate:

The Liberty Memorial:

“We won’t be Barred from the truth”

“Bill Barr, what are you hiding?”

“No one is above the law”

That’s what we used to think.

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): when you drink that much [insert national brand name of flavored sugar water] in public it just turns your tongue red and makes you look like an idiot

26 Tuesday Mar 2019

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

4th Congressional District, Bob Barr, Donald Trump, missouri, Robert Mueller, social media, special counsel, sychophant, Twitter, Vicky Hartzler

Earlier this evening:

Aaron Rupar @atrupar
Watch Wolf Blitzer corner Rudy Giuliani into admitting he can’t explain why members of the Trump campaign didn’t go to the FBI when Russian agents reached out offering dirt on Hillary Clinton
[….]
5:02 PM – 26 Mar 2019

That is a really good question.

And, of course, Representative Vicky Hartzler (r) can’t help herself:

Rep. Vicky Hartzler @RepHartzler
(1/2) It’s finally over. After 674 days,$25M tax dollars, 2800+ subpoenas, and conducting nearly 500 search warrants, Mueller concluded there was NO COLLUSION between Russia and @POTUS’s campaign, the President did NOT obstruct justice, and he is NOT charged with any crimes.
7:50 PM – 24 Mar 2019

Rep. Vicky Hartzler @RepHartzler
(2/2) The political witch hunt has concluded. It’s time to move on and get back to the business of addressing issues impacting the American people—that’s something we can all agree on.
7:51 PM – 24 Mar 2019

Some of the responses:

I recognize you aren’t a lawyer, but as a lawmaker you should be able to recognize the difference between the end of Mueller’s investigation, but the very real continuation of the SDNY’s investigation into financial crimes.

Unfortunately, for all of us, it is by no means over.

“…while this report does not conclude the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
-literally the words of the 4 page summary.

The prosecution of Manafort put the investigation in the black. $25 million for the investigation, Manafort is on the hook for $46 million. Pretty sure that equals PROFIT?

Learn to read.

Congresswoman you left out all the indictments, the guilty pleas, the fact that campaign chair is in federal prison and in federal court documents the president is referred as Individual 1.

Correction: The #BarrSummary concluded there was no collusion or obstruction while also stating “It does Not exonerate him” from obstruction of justice.
For a #WitchHunt there are an awful lot of people indicted and/or going to prison.
Let’s see the #MuellerReport

He did NOT say no obstruction. This a bald face lie.

It should not be hard to exonerate an innocent person. That in 2 years the special counsel was unable to exonerate the president speaks volumes. Your continued ignorance is a disservice to the 4th district and you should be ashamed of yourself

Paul Manaforts conviction and forfeiture PAID FOR THE WHOLE INVESTIGATION.

And the results don’t “exonerate trump once and for all”, they literally say they DO NOT exonerate him

… and that’s it now up to congress to proceed with subpoenas and charges

Do your job, stop lying.

37 People with criminal charges. including Russians who worked to help Donald Trump get elected.
@POTUS is a vindictive, narcissistic nincompoop and serial liar who praises despots and attacks honorable people who disagree with him or ask for accountability.

Actually you know that mueller stated that the report did not exonerate him. You also know that payments collected far exceed the cost of the investigation. But you won’t tweet that will you?

The investigation may have actually paid for itself based on what was uncovered, but you don’t want to actually talk about that do you, Vicky? You don’t even mention ACTUAL charges (199) brought. Stop. Trying. To. Spin.

You’re a partisan corrupt hack. The report says he is not exonerated. You clearly cannot read.

Not exonerated on the obstructing. Push for the full report to be released or you are a hypocrite, wait we know you are one. #BarrReport #ReleaseTheFullReport

The report does not exonerate Trump from obstruction of justice, according to Barr’s summary.

37 witches, including Russian operatives.

But wait…. I thought @realDonaldTrump just called Mueller an honorable man today? How can an honorable man be in charge of a witch hunt? What a political hack you and the president truly are-both of you!

Just curious…Do you support a release of the entire report? Do you believe Congress should be provided with the evidence that led to the report’s conclusions? Do you support letting the American people decide if the summary document accurately reflects Mueller’s findings?

Do you support releasing the whole report, not just the quick summary by a political appointee? If it completely clears the POTUS, let’s put any doubt to rest – demand the WHOLE report.

I know. 38 indictments are chopped liver. You Trump Republicans are amazing!

They ain’t buying it.

Display

24 Sunday Mar 2019

Posted by Michael Bersin in media criticism

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

bird, cable news networks, display, Donald Trump, Grackle, media criticism, missouri, Robert Mueller, special counsel, talking heads

The displays have started.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report has been forwarded to the Attorney General who has yet to release anything to Congress or the public. Meanwhile cable news network talking heads and panels are spinning without knowing. Or are they?

Here in west central Missouri this morning a large and very pushy group of Grackles descended on the bird seed out back, pushing out other feeding birds and pushing around each other.

Grackle. Quiscalus quiscula.
F 5.6, 1/1000 ISO 1600, 400 mm.

Just one too many times:

Grackle. Quiscalus quiscula.
F 5.6, 1/1000 ISO 1600, 400 mm.

Unlike the cable news network talking heads, at least this Grackle is getting something worthwhile out of his display.

← Older posts

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 773,409 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

 

Loading Comments...