• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Monthly Archives: September 2025

Eric Burlison (r): If you don’t look, it doesn’t exist?

10 Wednesday Sep 2025

Posted by Michael Bersin in Congress, social media

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

7th Congressional District, avoidance, Donald Trump, Epstein letter, Eric Burlison, missouri, right wingnut, social media, sycophant, Trump sycophant

Eric Burlison (r) [2025 file photo].

Acyn ‪@acyn.bsky.social‬

Raju: Have you seen that letter?

Burlison: I would like to see it matched with his handwriting

Raju: Here’s the letter

Burlison: I don’t want to see it

[….]

September 9, 2025 at 10:27 PM

The transcript:

Question: Have you seen that letter, and do you…

Eric Burlison (r): I’ve, I’ve not. But I would love to see it, like matched with his handwriting.

Question: Yeah. [crosstalk] Here’s the letter if you want…

Eric Burlison (r): It just [crosstalk] seems really, really, um, wild.

Question: [presents letter]

Eric Burlison (r): Yeah, I don’t, I don’t real…I don’t want to see that.

Question, Eric Burlison (r): [laughter]

Some of the responses:

Thinks don’t disappear because you can’t see them – most people figure that out by the time they turn 3.

Cowards don’t want to acknowledge their dear leader is guilty.

What’s so fkn FUNNY, BURLISON??

The next question should be: “Now can you plug your ears, close your eyes, and scream ‘La-la-la-la-la!’ for the camera?”

He’s wants to but doesn’t want to?

So once again – the cult members will deny anything – ANYTHING – against their deity, savior and Fuhrer.

Reports need to do their jobs?
Where was the follow up?
“Don’t you owe it to the American people to acknowledge this is his hand written?”
“What about the women that have come forward to say they were sexually assaulted by the president? Don’t you owe it to them to look at this?”
Not laugh too!

Ha ha ha ha ha burlison

And the reporter chuckles along with him instead of following up and asking him why he doesn’t want to see it. 😡

There it is.

That laughter at the very end sums up their thinking.

Such phonies

“See no evil, hear no evil”
Continue to back “Dear Leader” who can do no wrong in their eyes..

I don’t want to see it so I can continue to claim I haven’t seen it, and thus can continue to say I can’t comment on it.

“I’d like to see it, but I’m busy closing my eyes to reality. Please don’t interrupt.”

How more stupid can these GOP representatives be?
“I’d love to see”. Here it is.
“I don’t want to see”.

I don’t like that the reporter laughed too. This isn’t funny.

The guy then laughs at his own cowardice. He knows we see him- just another pathetic toady in a party or sycophants.

Like 3 year olds, republicans have no problem internalizing conflicting opposites.

1) I would like to match his handwriting.
Here’s the letter. Want to see it?
No

2) to a small child: do you want a piece of cake?
No (while reaching for it)

if you raised children,you know how republicans think.

“Letter? What letter?”

How else can he keep denying by saying “I’ve not seen it” if Raju shows it to him? The snake! The next journalist should straight out ask him if, by refusing to see it, he want to stay in a state of denial?

He’s acting as if he’s being served a subpoena.

schrodinger’s letter.

Eyes wide shut.

I’m sure you don’t….

Cue the nervous laugh

It’s like the little kid with chocolate on his face pointing to the dog when asked who ate the chocolate cake.

Real dumb. Still denying the truth when it’s right in his face.🤥

Giggling about it.

HB 1: Gerrymander this

09 Tuesday Sep 2025

Posted by Michael Bersin in Congress, Missouri General Assembly, Missouri Governor, Missouri House, Missouri Senate, Uncategorized

≈ 27 Comments

Tags

Extraordinary Session, Fascist pigs, General Assembly, gerrymandering, HB 1, missouri, Redistricting, sycophants, Trump sycophants

“Gerrymander This”

The right wingnut controlled Missouri General Assembly is proceeding with the gerrymandered early redistricting of Missouri’s congressional districts at the behest of Donald Trump (r). Fascists gotta Fascist:

103rd General Assembly, 2nd Extraordinary Session
HB 1 Creates provisions for redistricting federal congressional seats
Sponsor: Deaton, Dirk (159)
Proposed Effective Date: Varies
LR Number: 3344H.01P
Last Action: 09/08/2025 – Perfected (H)
Bill String: HB 1
[….]

Some of the submitted testimony to the Special Committee on Redistricting:

I oppose this power grab in an already gerrymandered state. Missouri overwhelmingly opposes the state passing harmful legislation and overturning voter approved bills. Embarrassing. History will not look kindly.

Gerrymandering is intentionally taking away the voice of the people. If we are a democracy, the voice of the people should be heard. Just as with our last election, our legislature has proven they do not care about their constituents or our votes. They only want power and control. Stop this nonsense, and start passing reforms to help everyday citizens.

I oppose this attempt to further marginalize the voices of non-Republicans in the state of Missouri. There is no moral or democratic reason for this mid decade redistricting. It is apparent that the Republican lawmakers are willing to silence the voices of Missouri citizens to follow the orders handed to them by a corrupt federal government.

This is an UNCONSTITUTIONAL call for gerrymandering. It is a blatant attempt to take away representation for Democratic voters. Democratic voters account for 40% of the vote in the state and already only have 25% representation. This will further dilute that representation to only 12%. This is anti-democratic!

There is no reason to redraw congressional districts; gerrymandering is unconstitutional and serves only to suppress the vote. There is no other legitimate and valid purpose. There is no compelling government interest that justifies this action. This is an arbitrary action that interferes with the fundamental rights of all citizens, regardless of political party.

Can we not bootlick a person in the Epstein files please? This is a distraction from the very real fact our sitting president was close friends with a pedophile…a pedophile and a rapist. And you scurry to do his bidding. Gross and embarrassing.

Members of the Committee,

I submit this testimony in opposition to the Governor’s proposed redistricting map. Article III, Section 3 of the Missouri Constitution establishes both the standards and the timing for redistricting.

First, Missouri’s Constitution makes clear that redistricting occurs only once every ten years following the U.S. Census, or if a court strikes down an existing plan. We are currently in the middle of the 2020 Census cycle, and no court has invalidated our maps. Attempting to redraw districts now has no constitutional basis and would directly conflict with the provisions of Article III.

Second, the Constitution requires that districts achieve partisan fairness and competitiveness. A map designed to guarantee a 7–1 congressional split grossly misrepresents Missouri’s statewide vote patterns, where Republicans typically receive about 57% of the vote and Democrats about 41%. Such an outcome would almost certainly exceed the 15% wasted-vote threshold and fail the responsiveness simulations required by our Constitution.

Finally, the Constitution requires that redistricting be carried out by the independent bipartisan citizens commission (or the judiciary if the commission fails), not by the General Assembly in special session. For these reasons, the mid-cycle timing, the fairness violations, and the improper process, I respectfully urge you to reject the Governor’s proposed map.

Thank you for your consideration.

I find it truly appalling and disheartening that the state I have called home for over 40 years is seeking to essentially negate the voices and will of 40% of its tax-paying citizens. It’s truly a travesty. No taxation without representation. I sincerely object as an American.

Supporting the out of schedule redrawing of congressional districts is a violation of the people of Missouri’s rights. This clearly an undemocratic attempt to prop the next election in favor of one party.

I stand in strong opposition to the redistricting plan proposed by Governor Kehoe and the Missouri Republicans. This legislation would leave Kansas City without meaningful representation, a clear violation of both the Missouri Constitution and the United States Constitution. The GOP received 58% of the statewide vote, yet they are attempting to take 7 of 8 congressional seats—87.5% of the representation. That is not democracy, it is gerrymandering. This plan will not survive constitutional scrutiny, and the inevitable litigation will waste millions of taxpayer dollars. Kansas Citians deserve representation, not disenfranchisement.

HB1 is a blatant attempt to redraw Missouri’s congressional map with no transparency, no public input, and no regard for the people it impacts. Maps should reflect real communities—not political calculations—but this proposal is nothing more than partisan and racial gerrymandering that silences voters in the 5th Congressional District and beyond. Redrawing maps mid-cycle is political gamesmanship that erodes trust in our democracy. Every person deserves to be heard, counted, and fairly represented—and HB1 denies Missourians that fundamental right by letting politicians choose their voters instead of voters choosing their representatives.

Redrawing Missouri’s district maps to heavily favor Republican voters, instead of representing a fair mix of how the Missouri populace actually votes is undemocratic and an insult to all voters of this great state. Coupled with the fact that Missouri’s current leadership does not want to abide by voter-passed initiatives, this new map is entirely self-serving and designed to make a stronghold where the people will never get a say again. The voters should choose its representatives, NOT the other way around.

This gerrymandering effort must not be allowed to move forward. Furthermore, if this map passes without a quorum, it is illegal and should be stricken.

I urge the committee to reject HB 1, the so-called “Missouri First Map,” an illegal and anti-democratic proposal designed to silence voters by rigging Congressional district maps solely for political leverage in advance of the 2026 elections.

The proposal would break up Kansas City and combine metro Kansas City with farmers over 250 miles away on the Illinois/Iowa border – making it harder for all of these communities to be fairly represented. Seven out of eight congressional districts would go to Republicans, even though Democrats make up about 40% of Missouri’s voters.

The Missouri Constitution says that Congressional redistricting only occurs every 10 years after the census. This accounts for population shifts to ensure that everyone’s vote counts. Missouri already did so after the most recent census — and rejected a 7-1 map like the proposal in front of you today. Redrawing lines mid-decade to split up voters’ ability to elect candidates of their choice violates our constitution.

Let’s be clear – this is about politicians choosing their voters, not voters choosing their representatives. And that’s just anti-democratic. This proposal is nothing more than an attempt to rig the 2026 elections before a single vote is even cast – at the behest of Washington DC, and at the expense of real Missourians.

Missourians across the political spectrum oppose this mid-decade redistricting. This proposal would silence hundreds of thousands of Missourians – pitting people against one another and breaking up communities instead of creating a system that works for everyone. Missouri lawmakers: Please stand up for your constituents and reject this effort to rig the district lines and split up our local communities.

Missouri is the show-me state. Please show your constituents and all Missourians that you care about their ability to make their voices heard fairly and reject this proposal.

As a voter, it is my constitutional right to be able to vote in my district without corrupt politicians and special interference groups interfering with my rights. Any and all involved in this scheme is openly anti-democracy and should be ashamed.

I urge the committee to reject HB 1, the so-called “Missouri First Map,” an illegal and anti-democratic proposal designed to silence voters by rigging Congressional district maps solely for political leverage in advance of the 2026 elections.

Missouri has had a Kansas City-based Congressional District since at least 1885, when a former Kansas City Mayor was elected to the post. Now Donald J. Trump, Governor Mike Kehoe and the GOP supermajority in Jefferson City want to break us up, destroying our traditional 5th Congressional
District and splitting Kansas City into 3 districts. We have been ably represented by Emanuel Cleaver II, another former Kansas City Mayor, since 2005. We cannot allow our community to be divided in an unprecedented mid-decade partisan gerrymander.

The plan developed is, of course, unconstitutional. “Districts shall be contiguous and as compact as may be.” This is not true of the GOP map, which spreads a portion of Kansas City into far west and southwest Missouri, comprising vast swaths of of rural areas, while the other district stretches beyond central Missouri into areas north and east of Columbia.

Communities shall be preserved. In this plan, they are not. One of Kansas City’s smallest and most diverse State House Districts would be in three Congressional Districts, not coincidentally dividing Kansas City’s sizable Latino Community.

Districts should follow political subdivision lines and split counties and county segments shall be as few as possible. In this plan, Jackson County is intentionally divided into three Districts, diluting the interests of our community in all three.

My home would be in the new 4th District, while 2 miles away, my neighbors east of Troost Avenue would be in the 5th, which includes Jefferson City and parts northeast of Columbia. The decision to utilize Troost Avenue is not coincidental- the GOP has intentionally utilized the disgraced ‘dividing line’ between Black and white Kansas City, enforced during the decades of de jure and de facto segregation.

This is a most cutting and offensive affront, especially to generations of civil rights leaders who have sought to tear down this Troost Avenue barrier.

Of course, using divisive boundaries like Troost Avenue immorally divides the City’s sizeable Black community, perpetuating segregation and the marginalization of minority and progressive communities.

This decision is wrong, morally bankrupt and, given the majority’s fealty to the whims of the President, likely to be rubber stamped by the General Assembly.

Kansas Citians will see you in court, and likely at the Ballot Box, to stop this illegal and unconstitutional GOP power grab!

The proposed redistricting plan will do nothing to further fair, free elections in the state of Missouri and will simply serve to hurt all Missourians by disenfranchising those in areas that have historically elected Democrats and also by reducing the incentives for Republicans in ‘safe’ districts to listen to their constituents as their districts are seen as even less competitive than they already are.

This power grab is unconstitutional, undemocratic, and unacceptable. The Missouri Constitution is explicit: redistricting happens after the Census, once per decade. There is no provision for redrawing maps “whenever it suits you.” To divide Kansas City, dilute Black and urban representation, and rig outcomes is a betrayal of your oath and an assault on the rights of every voter in this state.

I submit this testimony in opposition to HB 1. You are undermining the very values that US Democracy is built on by moving this bill forward. I’m embarrassed by this blatantly illegal power grab from our elected officials. You do not want this to be your legacy from your time in office.

Missouri has overturned the will of the people time and time again, and it’s time this ends. Missouri republicans are in the back pocket of a convicted felon, rapist, and authoritarian. I strongly oppose H.B. 1 and any other attempt to redraw Missouris congressional map before the 2026 midterm election. This will rob voters of their rights. This will rob the 40% of Missourians who vote democratic ticket. Voters should choose their representatives, not the other way around.

I am against anything against the well being of the working class

Missouri maps should not be determined by the President of the United States. This bill is an attempt by the majority party to pick their voters which is an undemocratic attempt to preserve the congressional majority in Washington. Listening to the hearing today, it’s clear there is no legitimate reason to change maps other than aquiesing to President Trump. We are not blind.

Representatives should be chosen by the voters and should actually work in the interests of voters. Communities don’t want this. We are tired of people not working in the best interests of people, but for themselves. As a veteran I am embarrassed of these leaders.

What in the world do you all think you’re doing?! It is only legal to redistrict immediately following a census. I’m not sure why you all think you make adjustments at the whim of an authoritarian president. I vehemently oppose this bill. The world is watching the US democracy collapse; Missouri does not have to contribute even more to its inevitability!

Elected officials should represent all constituents who reside in the state. I fear there will be a time that the state is turned into a battleground as it swings back and forth between parties rather than honoring one person one vote representing all of the people. Missouri is a state with priorities that differ region to region. All of the regions should be represented by people who can and will represent them. This attempt to silence opposing views is anti-democratic and anti-American. It diminishing the state.

I don’t support this. You should not either.

I could list all the reasons why redistricting Missouri in the manner is wrong. But you know them all
already.

I could call you out on the fact that this is a blatant power grab. But you know this, and you know we
know.

I could speak on all the ways you openly lie to your constituents and yourselves, because you’ve seen the playbook where lies are rewarded with power. You know.

I could state facts that are irrefutable regarding how your continued support of flawed policy and radically unpopular and undemocratic ideas are tearing apart our economy, our communities, our democracy, and our peace. You know.

And with all your knowledge and all your facts, you will bend the knee to the same bad ideas. Showing no leadership or moral compass. Digging the hole that has kept you from facing your constituents ever deeper.

But many of us were raised by the golden rule. To love thy neighbor. That people faught, marched, and died for equal rights, equal protections, equal say, freedom, and democracy.

Your vote to pass redistricting in Missouri just proves everything they say about you. That you can’t win without cheating. That you are in office for your own self interest. That you believe Missouri communities are not deserving of representation. And that there’s just absolutely and unequivocally people in this state that you don’t care about. Well that’s not true, you care enough to take their vote and their voice.

You’ll probably vote to pass this, pat yourselves on the back and bask in the glow of dollars thrown your way. And for a moment you will rest in what you’ve done. But one thing I know, you will all crumble to the consequences of these actions. You will lose family, friends, coworkers, respect, community, and at some point the power you sold your soul for.

I hope this moment in time, and the disgust you reap upon yourselves is worth it.

This is illegal and unconstitutional. It is totally a racist, political power grab to attempt to steal representation from the voters of District 5. It is our governor’s attempt to please President Trump. This is not democratic. Elections must be won fairly, or we risk becoming a facist country. This is wrong! Please do not allow it.

I am vehemently opposed to this unconstitutional attempt to redraw Missouri congressional districts to disenfranchise voters who do not support the Trump agenda. The Republican Party claims to be the party of small government but have proven time and time again that they are only interested in serving the elite and capitulating to the requests of Donald Trump. These attempts to redraw districts mid-decade illustrate how unpopular the Republican agenda is and makes it crystal clear that they feel they can only win elections by cheating. Missouri republicans have lost their moral compass and sold their souls to Donald Trump and the billionaire class. Missouri has significant issues that need to be addressed, but instead of focusing on solutions to address our impending budget crisis, lack of resources in rural areas of the state and the hundreds of foster children sleeping in offices every year due to a shortage of appropriate foster homes, the governor and legislature have decided once again to prioritize Donald Trump over the best interest of Missourians.

Restricting and changing the Missouri constitution denies Missouri voters our voice. You were elected to serve the people, and now you are rigging our state to serve a power hungry elite who could care less about strengthening our communities. This is the opposite of servant leadership. Is this the legacy you want to leave for the citizens of Missouri?

This is clearly designed to cheat fair elections. If you want votes, then promote policies that voters want. This administration has twice voted to overturn the will of the people with the right to body autonomy and health insurance coverage and now proposes to silence our voices altogother by suppressing our votes . If you don’t want a democracy, move elsewhere.

When we decide whether people deserve representation or land deserves representation, it will be only the corrupt who choose land. The history of this country is time and again, power being given to land owners over Slaves, over women, over immigrants. Time and again, history has sided with individuals. Be on the right side of history.

Please do not disenfranchise us further. I would like to feel like my vote matters. This is extremely deceptive since you are already not respecting what we voted for back in November. This is absolutely unacceptable.

[….] I am a lifelong Missourian speaking today in opposition to House Bill 1 (HB 1), introduced on September 3, 2025, which creates provisions for redistricting Missouri’s federal congressional districts.

Why I Oppose This Bill

1. It risks undermining fair representation.

Redistricting inherently shapes how and whose voices are heard. Without transparent, impartial criteria, HB 1 could enable partisan maps that prioritize political advantage over democratic representation. Missourians deserve maps drawn with integrity, not political gain.

2. It is out of the political norm.

Traditionally, redistricting is handled in regular order with an expectation of broad consultation and balanced input. To take up a bill of this magnitude in a rushed special session, without clear public demand, signals a departure from established norms. This sets a troubling precedent for how we govern and undermines the legitimacy of the process.

3. It lacks meaningful public input and community-centered criteria.

Fair redistricting should prioritize preserving communities of interest, geographic continuity, and voter cohesion. HB 1 is silent on these standards, making the process disconnected from the people it impacts and further eroding public trust.

4. Unchecked redistricting decisions foster political polarization.

When district lines are drawn to favor one party, elections become less competitive, and elected officials feel less accountable to all constituents. Missouri needs leaders who represent diverse voices, not legislators insulated by heavily gerrymandered districts.

What Missourians Deserve Instead

Independent redistricting commissions structured to prevent self-dealing and ensure maps serve the people rather than insiders

Clear, publicly available criteria, including respect for communities of interest and geographic compactness

Open, participatory processes with accessible hearings and meaningful opportunities for citizen feedback

For redistricting to reinforce democracy, it must be rooted in transparency, fairness, and public involvement, not in political maneuvering.

Conclusion

I respectfully urge you to oppose HB 1. Missouri deserves a redistricting process that protects fairness
in representation, transparency in decision-making, and public trust in government. To pass this bill
now, in this way, would be both harmful and outside the norms of responsible governance.

Thank you for your consideration.

Respectfully,
[….]

Opposition in the thousands. But the right wingnut super-majority in the Missouri General Assembly won’t listen.

Salus populi suprema lex esto – “The welfare of the people shall be the supreme law.”

Eric Schmitt (r): promoting Donald Trump’s (r) snuff film

08 Monday Sep 2025

Posted by Michael Bersin in Congress, Eric Schmitt, social media, US Senate

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

clown, Eric Schmitt, Fascist pig, gaslighting, missouri, right wingnut, social media, sycophant, Trump sycophant, U.S. Senate

Eric Schmitt (r) [2025 file photo].

Yesterday:

Senator Eric Schmitt
[September 7, 2025]

Democrats can’t help but be on the wrong side of every single issue.
While they rush to defend violent crime and narcoterrorists, President Trump is busy making America safe again.
[….]

Some of the responses:

Attacking a civilian boat during peacetime is a crime.
You stop, search and arrest.

Declaring the US to be the ‘COPS of the Western Hemisphere’ as an excuse for committing an act of war / murder on the high seas with no actual evidence of any wrong doing is about as stupid as killing fishermen in someone else’s country because they were – uh – fishing. Didn’t have anything to do with Democrats, dumba$$.

I’d like one instance of anyone, who is not a criminal or a lawyer, defending, encouraging, or enjoying crime in any way.

I would like to hire a president that doesn’t break the law while trying to say they’re enforcing the law. Which is exactly what we see currently

absolutely correct. The irony of hypocrisy wrapped in delusional projection is real strong with this crew. My point is, “they” say the left defends criminals. This is absurd. Like the white Nationalists they are, they can’t help show their contradicting ideology.

none of them care about anything but allegiance to Donald trump. That’s it. He gave them a group of people to hate and they let their hate run wild. They don’t know anything about constitutional law nor care about it. All they want is him to attack the people they hate. And they only hate the people because he gave them someone to hate.
On a regular basis they use examples of previous administrations or presidents specifically from the Democrat Party who have done things that they want to see them hung for, and then as soon as Donald Trump does the exact same thing, which he does regularly, they use those people as an excuse to justify him doing it.
If they actually cared about any of it they would be equally as upset with him for doing the things he does as they do the other presidents they hate and want to see literally hung.
They’re the most subservient slave mentality group of people I’ve ever encountered in 52 years on this planet.

they are a group of people who are LED around by the nose.
They were told and believed that we now lived in a third world country by Donald Trump because prices went up during the global pandemic.
The very people who screamed third world country now will tell you that this is all just the price of progress because Donald Trump told them that’s what they have to believe now.

they have no goal other than power. And they’ll use whatever disingenuous nonsense they can come up with to justify that. Not an honest actor in the whole party. Including this guy.

Eric Schmitt (r) [2024 file photo].

What “crime” was committed by the people on the boat? We know only what tRump and his “Department of War” tell us.

we have no real idea, except that it is clearly a violation of international law. Unless we changed the prescription to alleged equals death penalty when I wasn’t looking. Though that might be on the table for this group.

I mean, a boat, thousands of miles away, that might have something on it, but who knows, is totally worth the ordinance expenditure. Laws for thee, not for me

MURDER WITHOUT TRIAL IS A WAR CRIME

Rand Paul is right:
Paul wrote in a post of his own later Saturday that “JD ‘I don’t give a s—’ Vance says killing people he accuses of a crime is the ‘highest and best use of the military.’”
“Did he ever read To Kill a Mockingbird? Did he ever wonder what might happen if the accused were immediately executed without trial or representation??” the Kentucky senator added.
“What a despicable and thoughtless sentiment it is to glorify killing someone without a trial,” he continued.

Where were you January 6???

Was there any evidence of drugs on the boat?

Now, conveniently, no. This has been another edition of Short Answers to Simple Questions.

Make war crimes bad again.

Mr Schmit’s post is best discarded as it makes claims without presenting evidence.

He does that a lot.

Eric is projecting.

You dont get to be judge, jury and executioner. This is not how a civilized world works.

You’re serving a convicted felon who let over 1500 violent criminals go free. Not to mention the abhorrent acts he committed with Epstein. Don’t talk about crime. Just like the Confederates, Repubs are on the wrong side of history.

Please show us the evidence that they were gang members to start? Telling fishermen that they might be in danger! WTF!

By violating international law and exposing our citizens to the exact same treatment

You evidently can’t help but be on Trump’s side of every issue. Have you ever had an original thought in your life?

Evidently not.

Yet you come out as a white supremacist. How disgusting.

Like being on the racist side?

What BS. We’re at a 30 year low in the crime rate. Look up the facts.

Killed some poor fishermen …..

Senator it’s called murder. You are supporting a murderer.

So wait….you’re telling me this crappy boat was going to make it over 1000 miles to the US without refueling? It was an immediate threat? Come on. We aren’t stupid.

You mean like Trump pardoning all the J6er’s? But yeah, keep peddling your BS.

Bootlicker

Fuck you Eric

You’re an embarrassment to every sane person in Missouri. You’re nothing but a hypocrite and coward.

another false bs claim… only fools believe this crap…

You’re a outspoken white supremacist so your opinions are not particularly valued.

how about the War Dept show proof this 22’ skiff was traveling over 2,000 miles in open ocean to the US with drugs fully exposed with 11 people taking the majority of cargo space warranted being struck by a $225k guided missile.

Who’d the one who pardoned the criminals already convicted on Jan 6th?

Keep drinking the kool aid. Racist wanker

llegally killing people in international waters because the Secretary of Defense is a war monger with an oversized ego and a drinking problem.

Yeah shot up a fishing boat ffs

Vague hateful comments like this are what divides this country. Shame on you.
No one is cheering for crime. We are, however, concerned about the constitutionality of these policies. It’s a valid concern, and one shared by voters on both sides of the aisle.
Do your job.

That boat was incapable of getting anywhere near our shores. And with 11 people in an open hull? Not much room for a significant amount of drugs.
Keep blindly believing otherwise, senator.

So you’re on the side of killing people with no trials, no matter where they are or where they’re from?

So can you give Americans a list of the people on that boat and the crimes they were convicted of in American courts

How long have you been a war criminal, Eric?

History will show…..you fascist enabler….you are on the wrong side…….so we bomb a random boat now……will we be shooting down a passenger plane next?

Look at that boat where were the drugs? If you were smuggling drugs why would you have 11 people on the boat wouldn’t itmake since to have that extra weight in drugs. You clown

Are you and trump trying to start a war with Venezuela? He has bragged that when has never had a war started under his rule, but this sure looks like one to me. This is not making America safe, it is inviting violence by another who absolutely has the right to consider this an attack on them. Are you trying to start a war so you can declare martial law and close voting off indefinitely?

A boat 1000 miles away from the states that may or may not had drugs or coming to our country, is blown up. And we are okay with our government’s far reach? I don’t believe for one minute, that Trump and his cronies didn’t have another agenda. There is a cover up you can bet on it.

Pointing out that it’s a war crime to use the military to murder unidentified people in international water hundreds of miles from our coast isn’t defending violent crime or narcoterrorists. It’s telling of your lack of integrity that you’ve chosen to toss aside the rule of law in favor of placating an authoritarian who appears to be intent on grasping every strand of control with his own tiny hands.
On the other hand, we DO have a Senator who proudly stood up and publicly announced that the United States is supposed to be a white homeland. You’re a white supremacist who not only can’t be depended on to fairly represent ALL of your constituents, you’ve chosen to brag that you have no interest in representing them. You’re a disgrace to your party and your oath.

drug dealers don’t put 11 people on a boat. you have no idea who you killed.

Don’t be a Nazi Mr Senator.
Gaslighting is dangerous.

Fiddling While The Constitution Burns

07 Sunday Sep 2025

Posted by Michael Bersin in Congress, Mark Alford, social media

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

4th Congressional District, former newsreader, identification, Mark Alford, Passport, read the room, right wingnut, social media

Is he trying to tell us something?

Mark Alford (r) [2025 file photo]

Friday:

Congressman Mark Alford
[September 5, 2025]

Hey Missouri, need a passport?
Check out this opportunity to get one at the passport fair!
[….]

There was much hilarity in the responses:

Most Missourians only need a passport or passport card to show to ICE while at work. Of course that only applies to those working while brown. Old white guys like me never get asked for ID.

Yet.

I mean, we’d really just like our sick leave back, since, y’know…WE VOTED FOR IT.

Awesome, now leave!!💯🤡

What is proof of citizenship? I would think your birth certificate is such.

is is, unless you have changed your name, like women who marry and change their last name.

but your current ID should have your correct name on it and would have had to show documents when name change was made. It’s all to put burden on women.

It almost gives women incentive NOT to marry and go through the hassle. I thought Republicans wanted marriages. Women are not going to jump through hoops. It’s easier not to marry…..

I tell young women when they marry to keep their names

How about holding one in every county you represent?

Why not everywhere you represent?

because he doesn’t care

Will they be at reduced cost or free?

No. This has been another edition of Short Answers to Simple Questions.

ICE agents will be at the door

“Fuck Ice”

Is this only in St Louis

Apparently, we ALL need passports.

Your papers, please.

my son in law carries his at all times now because he is Latino, speaks fluent Spanish at his job and is scared to death ICE will arrest him for the crime of being Latino

Why not one in your district ? St. Louis is 4 hours away

This seems like a trap…

“ICE is the new Gestapo”

Yea all women in Mo will probably need one to vote because of GOP.

Can we renew our existing at this “fair”? Will there be canapès and cocktails while you wait? Whom is the entertainment? Valet parking?

Why? You can go to the Post Office and apply for a passport. This seems like a trap somehow.

Every woman is going to need one, if you guys get your way. They need to be free!

“Nasty Women Vote!”

if they were free the people they don’t want to vote will get passports

Yeah. Let’s get a far away from fuckawful Alford as possible.

Mark Alford (r) [2025 file photo]

Um, not sure how this will help any of the constituents in YOUR DISTRICT. You really are a daft human. #VoteAlfordOut

Sure, ill drive torn up old I-70 to get to St Louis….how’s that road improvements going? About as well as the exposing the Felons crimes?

Just St. Louis? You might get more self deportations by offering US citizens free if other countries would accept them.

Uh.

Everyone will need a passport to leave the shambles Trump will leave this great country in!!

Do you need a passport while your head is up trumps ass?

The best president of Alford’s lifetime. And it has to be true, because Cult media is stating it [….]

BEWARE: Mark is selling fake passports.

If you had ANY morals you would speak out against Senator’s Schmitt’s racism.

This.

Yes, so we can leave this fascist dictatorship.

Fuck you. This is basically forcing transgender people to out themselves so they’ll be on a government no fly-list. Whos next? Jewish people? Black people? Muslims? People who were born in blue states? People who were born to same sex parents? Why isnt a social security card and a photo ID good enough?

Do you feel we all need to leave from your horrible policy positions?

At least you’re giving people, especially women, a chance to get the fuck out of the country.

We are the granddaughters of the witches you were never able to burn” [2020 file photo]

Kehoe’s Got a Clunker for You

07 Sunday Sep 2025

Posted by penroseonpolitics in Congress, Missouri General Assembly, Missouri Governor, Missouri House, Missouri Senate

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Donald Trump, Mike Kehoe, Missouri Ballot Initiatives, missouri congressional map, Missouri Constitution, Missouri Constitutional Amendments, Missouri Gerrymandering, Missouri Governor, Missouri Legislature, Missouri Republican Party, Missouri Special Session, voter suppression

WT Actual F?

06 Saturday Sep 2025

Posted by Michael Bersin in social media

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Chicago, Department of War, Donald Trump, Fascist pig, Illinois, social media, UnAmerican

This morning, from Donald Trump (r):

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump

‘I love the smell of deportations in the morning…’

Chicago is about to find out why it’s called the Department of WAR [….]
[….]
Sep 06, 2025, 10:38 AM

Fascist pig.

Reactions:

‪Governor JB Pritzker‬ ‪@govpritzker.illinois.gov‬

The President of the United States is threatening to go to war with an American city.

This is not a joke. This is not normal.

Donald Trump isn’t a strongman, he’s a scared man. Illinois won’t be intimidated by a wannabe dictator.

God‬ ‪@thegodpodcast.com‬

Draft-dodging coward posts A.I. image of himself in Vietnam.

‪jamelle‬ ‪@jamellebouie.net‬

if i had the opportunity to ask a question of anyone in the administration, given this “war in chicago” messaging, i would ask them how many americans the president intends to kill in his war

All of us. He intends to kill all of us.

‪Mehdi Hasan‬ ‪@mehdirhasan.bsky.social‬

The president of the United States just declared war, actual military war, not a metaphorical one, on a major American city, and one governed by his political opponents.

In any other period, this would be impeachment-worthy.

‪Karly Kingsley‬ ‪@karlykingsley.bsky.social‬

Just the President of the United States threatening war with an American city.

Your Internet Friend Tom Tomorrow‬ ‪@tomtomorrow.bsky.social‬

I know one person who needs to hear this, but the robert duvall character in apocalypse now was meant to be seen as an absolute fucking lunatic

‪Kat Abughazaleh‬ ‪@katmabu.bsky.social‬

The President of the United States just essentially declared a war on Chicago because — wait for it! — Black and Brown people live here.

This is not normal. This is not okay. And we are going to fucking fight back.

Aaron Reichlin-Melnick‬ ‪@reichlinmelnick.bsky.social‬

🚨Trump drops all pretense and openly admits the mass raids in Chicago are about ICE raids and deportations (not crime), and essentially declares that he’s going to war with the city.

Alan Rosenblatt‬ ‪@drdigipol.bsky.social‬

This sounds like Trump is declaring war on Chicago.

Anyone else have 99 problems with this?

‪Carl T. Bergstrom‬ ‪@carlbergstrom.com‬

Everyone knows he’s crazy and no one takes anything he posts seriously but declaring war on Chicago is next level.

Send in the Clown…

06 Saturday Sep 2025

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

clown, Department of Defense, Department of War, Donald Trump, Elect a Clown Expect a Circus, performative bullshit, wasting money

“War [good god!] Is Good [what is it good for?] For Absolutely Nothing [say it again!]”
Circa 2001-2005.
28 x 22, posterboard, permanent marker.

RESTORING THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF WAR
Executive Orders
September 5, 2025

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:

Section 1. Purpose. On August 7, 1789, 236 years ago, President George Washington signed into law a bill establishing the United States Department of War to oversee the operation and maintenance of military and naval affairs. It was under this name that the Department of War, along with the later formed Department of the Navy, won the War of 1812, World War I, and World War II, inspiring awe and confidence in our Nation’s military, and ensuring freedom and prosperity for all Americans. The Founders chose this name to signal our strength and resolve to the world. The name “Department of War,” more than the current “Department of Defense,” ensures peace through strength, as it demonstrates our ability and willingness to fight and win wars on behalf of our Nation at a moment’s notice, not just to defend. This name sharpens the Department’s focus on our own national interest and our adversaries’ focus on our willingness and availability to wage war to secure what is ours. I have therefore determined that this Department should once again be known as the Department of War and the Secretary should be known as the Secretary of War.

Sec. 2. Implementation. (a) The Secretary of Defense is authorized the use of this additional secondary title — the Secretary of War — and may be recognized by that title in official correspondence, public communications, ceremonial contexts, and non-statutory documents within the executive branch.

(b) The Department of Defense and the Office of the Secretary of Defense may be referred to as the Department of War and the Office of the Secretary of War, respectively, in the contexts described in subsection (a) of this section.

(c) The provisions of this section shall also apply, as appropriate, to subordinate officials within the Department of Defense, who may use corresponding secondary titles such as Deputy Secretary of War or Under Secretary of War in the contexts described in subsection (a) of this section.

(d) All executive departments and agencies shall recognize and accommodate the use of such secondary titles in internal and external communications, provided that the use of such titles does not create confusion with respect to legal, statutory, or international obligations.

(e) Statutory references to the Department of Defense, Secretary of Defense, and subordinate officers and components shall remain controlling until changed subsequently by the law.

(f) Within 30 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of War shall submit to the President, through the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, a notification for transmittal to the Congress of any office, executive department or agency, component, or command that begins using a secondary Department of War designation.

(g) Within 60 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of War shall submit to the President, through the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, a recommendation on the actions required to permanently change the name of the Department of Defense to the Department of War. This recommendation shall include the proposed legislative and executive actions necessary to accomplish this renaming.

Sec. 3. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

(d) The costs for publication of this order shall be borne by the Department of War.

DONALD J. TRUMP

THE WHITE HOUSE,

September 5, 2025.

“Secondary title.” Performative bullshit. And expensive, too.

The reviews (and sarcasm) are in:

Captain Mark Kelly‬ ‪@captmarkkelly.bsky.social‬
Only someone who avoided the draft would want to rename the Department of Defense to the Department of War.
[….]

Mehdi Hasan‬ ‪@mehdirhasan.bsky.social‬
The ‘antiwar’ president today tried to rename the Department of Defense the Department of War.

Can’t make this stuff up.

‪Adam Kinzinger‬ ‪@adamkinzinger.substack.com‬

Department of war? More like Department of Distraction…. Epstein
[….]

‪Jeff Tiedrich‬ ‪@jefftiedrich.bsky.social‬

because nothing says ‘I deserve the Nobel Peace Prize’ more than renaming your Department of Defense to the Department of War

Chris Hayes‬ ‪@chrislhayes.bsky.social‬

If there were a “Department of War” it would obviously be very very small when we aren’t at war, right?

Randi Mayem Singer‬ ‪@rmayemsinger.bsky.social‬

Bragging that you ended 7 wars… and then changing the name of the Department of Defense to the Department of War seems incongruous.

Roberto Baldwin‬ ‪@strngwys.bsky.social‬

Important to remember that everyone involved in renaming the DoD to the Department of War is afraid to take the subway.

And that children, is why there are now Federal troops in Washington, D.C.

‪D. Earl Stephens‬ ‪@dearlstephens.bsky.social‬

A draft-dodger renaming the Defense Department the Department of War screams complete inadequacy.

Hoodlum ‪@nothoodlum.bsky.social‬

Pro tip: If you’ve spent the last decade begging for a Nobel Peace Prize, maybe don’t rebrand the Defense Department as the Department of War. Not exactly a winning strategy.

Joshua Erlich‬ ‪@joshuaerlich.bsky.social‬

so Department of War is more like a nickname. like, DOD’s teacher wouldn’t be allowed to call it Department of War in Florida.
[…]

Heh.

‪Governor Jay Inslee‬ ‪@govjayinslee.bsky.social‬

Also renaming the Department of Health and Human Services, the
“Department of War on Vaccines.”
[….]

Ouch.

‪Will Bunch‬ ‪@willbunch.bsky.social‬

You wouldn’t rename it the Department of War unless you were thinking of starting one soon

‪Adam Schwarz‬ ‪@adamjschwarz.bsky.social‬

Pete Hegseth says the Trump administration is restoring the name of Department of War because the US “hasn’t won a major war since” it was renamed the Department of Defence.

These people are breathtakingly stupid.
[….]

And so are their voters.

‪Ido Amir‬ ‪@idoamir.bsky.social‬

If you squint really hard you can see “Department of War” ACTUALLY reads “Lowering Egg Prices”.

A king’s ransom…

‪gwen howerton‬ ‪@kissphoria.bsky.social‬

Please do not deadname the Department of War

‪Bill Kristol‬ ‪@billkristolbulwark.bsky.social‬

Trump’s policies are leading us into recession, he’s kicking people off of health insurance and denying them vaccines, he’s destroying the rule of law, he’s being played for a fool by Putin..but he’s going to call the Department of Defense the Department of War! America is great again!

Pathetic.

Anthony Michael Kreis‬ ‪@anthonymkreis.bsky.social‬

I would be okay with a Department of War if we also had an Under-Secretary of Sea Shanties.

“Hic sunt dracones.”

‪Raffi Melkonian‬ ‪@rmfifthcircuit.bsky.social‬

Department of War is the kind of thing I’d have thought was extremely cool when I was 10 and playing with little green army men.

Bingo!

‪Rocky Mountain Mike‬ ‪@rockymntnmike.bsky.social‬

Renaming the Department of Defense the Department of War! What is it good for?

Absolutely nothing.

Elect a clown, expect a circus.

Mark Alford (r): franked campaign propaganda on our dimes

05 Friday Sep 2025

Posted by Michael Bersin in Congress, Mark Alford

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

4th Congressional District, franking, Mark Alford, missouri, Propaganda, sycophant, Trump sycophant

Mark Alford (r) [2024 file photo].

In today’s U.S. Mail, a franked mailing from from Mark Alford (r):

This particular piece doesn’t show up in the House Clerk’s database – yet.

The actual damage:

House Republicans’ tax and budget bill would rip away health care, food, and jobs in every congressional district
Estimated number of losses in health care coverage, people put at risk for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefit cuts, and jobs at risk by 119th congressional district

District MO-04
Representative Mark Alford
Party affiliation Republican
Estimated health insurance coverage losses, 2034 23K
Number of people at risk of losing some or all SNAP benefits 19K
Number of jobs put at risk by elimination of clean energy tax credits 170

Despite ‘No Tax on Tips,’ Trump’s Big ‘Beautiful’ Bill Is Bad for Tipped Workers
“No tax on tips” is a symbolic tax break that is very limited and poorly targets the workers who need tax relief the most. Many among the small number of workers who will benefit will also face the bill’s cuts to basic needs programs.
[….]
One of the most–discussed policies in the Republican-passed One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) is the “no tax on tips” provision, which eliminates federal income taxes on the first $25,000 of tips earned by workers making less than $150,000 per year ($300,000 for married filers). Despite appearances, this provision will benefit only a small number of workers, and many of those workers will disproportionately suffer financial losses due to the OBBBA’s severe program cuts. The net result is that tipped workers are unlikely to experience significant gains from the OBBBA overall.
[….]
Because most workers who earn tips are relatively low income, “no tax on tips” has raised hopes that the OBBBA will benefit low-income Americans. For instance, analysts at The Budget Lab at Yale find that low-wage workers are several times more likely to receive tips than are high earners. However, tipped workers are vulnerable to other policy changes in the OBBBA that will offset the benefit of the tips deduction.
[….]

The One “Big Beautiful Bill” Provision That Says It All
How the OBBBA Cuts a Tax that Truly Benefits Only the Mega Rich.
[….]
The estate tax is paid for by heirs not by the deceased who are, you know, dead. Those heirs are decidedly not being double taxed as they didn’t earn the money in the first place. On the small business side, there’s perhaps a bit more merit. But, the typical small business is nowhere near large enough to be affected by an estate tax, even with the smaller $5 million exemption. In my own calculations using the Survey of Consumer Finances, the median self-employed person has a household net worth of about $460,000. One has to look above the 88th percentile to find self-employed people with household net worths above the $5 million exemption. Plus, the individual exemption is doubled for couples to $10 million, moving the number to the 93rd percentilefor affected businesses with a married couple involved, as many are. The OBBBA pushes those numbers to the 96th percentile for an individual and the 99th percentile for a couple. Most small businesses wouldn’t be affected by the estate tax with or without the OBBBA.
[….]
Indeed, the OBBBA is part of a long-term trend of weakening the estate tax so that even most very, very rich people in the U.S. are not affected by the tax at all.
[….]

I Wish Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Was the Solution to America’s Child Care Crisis. It’s Not.
Beware the ‘momwashing’ provisions.
[….]
The Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit. This expanded tax credit ups the percentage that working parents can get back on child care expenses. Good on its face, sure, but it’s a superficial bone to throw. Parents have always been able to claim a certain percentage of child care expenses up to a certain amount. Now they can claim a slightly higher percentage of child care expenses up to a certain amount. That certain amount is $3,000 for one child and $6,000 for two or more. The percentage that could be claimed prior to the OBBB expansion ranged from 34% for families right on the poverty line ($30,000-$34,000 household income) to 20% for families bringing in over $206,000 per year. With the new bill, parents in the former bracket (right on the poverty line) can claim up to 49% of that allowed amount, with families making more than $34,000, but still below $206,000, getting a little boost on a sliding scale based on income bracket.

But let’s be clear, here: These are tax credits. Tax credits still require parents to pay up front for child care and then wait to recoup that break when they file their tax return. Not a single state can claim an average cost of accredited child care anywhere near the price tag of $3,000 per child annually so there’s a good chance most families are still paying beyond what they could claim. What’s more, both parents need to be working (or actively looking for work) in order to get the benefit.

Best case scenario: A family with a combined working income of $34,000, paying $6,000 for their two kids for the entire year (10% of their income) and filing everything perfectly when tax season rolls around, could now expect to get back $2,940 instead of $2040. $900 more. It is simply not realistic, in practice, and will barely dent the growing financial pressure on families that need the break the most.
[….]

Mark Alford (r) sent his constituents a pile of bullshit. We paid for it…and we’ll continue to do so.

Mark Alford (r) [2023 file photo].

Eric Schmitt (r): saying the quiet parts out loud

04 Thursday Sep 2025

Posted by Michael Bersin in Eric Schmitt, social media, US Senate

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Eric Schmitt, Fascist pig, missouri, right wingnut, social media, sycophant, Trump sycophant, U.S. Senate

Eric Schmitt (r) [2025 file photo].

Yesterday:

Senator Eric Schmitt
[September 3, 2025]
We’re not sorry. Why would we be sorry?
America is the most magnificent heritage ever known to man.
We can no longer apologize for who we are.
[….]

Some of the responses:

Wow. You are pathetically cowardly. Your people came in the 1840s? Mine came in the 1660s – indentured servants. Europe didn’t send their best, sweetie – they emptied their prisons, their asylums, their poor houses HERE. The Puritans didn’t come here for ‘religious freedom’ – they came to avoid taxes and for ‘free stuff’ – free land. Freedom to impose their own religious tyranny – Salem wasn’t an aberration. This is just an updated redux of Alexander Stephens’ “Cornerstone speech”, carefully ignoring the slavery industrial complex, Indigenous defenses of THEIR homes, the Spanish, Chinese laborers, Mexicans, and WOMEN. If you are too insecure, too self-delusioal, too cowardly, too stuck in a mythical past to deal with HONEST American history, then perhaps you should resign. Because the unique status of this nation isn’t about exclusion, it’s about inclusion – it’s about the EXACT proposition that all PEOPLE are equal before the law: that we the governed have a right to a say in our governance, that all people have the right to exist in freedom from tyranny, and to ensure that right, a system of laws and governance for ALL the People. Inherent in that proposition is change – the right to change as needed, as knowledge advances, as greater truths and facts become known, as PEOPLE change. And we DO – we HAVE. The world isn’t stuck in the 1850s or whatever magical timeframe you imagine. And if you’re too fragile, too dependent on whitewashed myths to exist in the real world, where we are all truly connected in ways we’re only beginning to understand, then please – retire to some retrograde little self-sufficient walled-off colony down in the hills and NEVER ever use any of the 21st century modern conveniences again. And FYI – GPS was developed by a Black woman.

As an adult, you should know that no one should need to apologize for who they are, but you SHOULD be willing and capable of making a sincere apology for actions that harm others, such as denying healthcare and easy access to food. Then they should endeavor sincerely to atone by helping those harmed to recover from the hurt done, and not repeating that harmful actions. By that definition you are not an adult, but you could, if you truly believed in the magnificent heritage that is our country, and realized that it was not one group of people that made it so, but many immigrants who came together with their many ideas, cultures and beliefs and worked hard to make it magnificent.

Read between his lines…he believe is was only WHITE SETTLERS who created this nation.
He conveniently omits the SLAVE LABOR of black and indigenous peoples who LITERALLY built this nation.
SCHMITT IS A WHITE SUPREMACIST.

When have you ever apologized?

What are you most proud of? The slaughter of indigenous tribes? The slavery? The exploitation of workers to benefit the rich?
We can talk about the benefits of innovation, winning WWII, etc. However, we can’t talk about those without noting the harm of laissez-faire capitalism, Japanese concentration camps, or the atomic bomb. In other words, we will stand in the way of your attempt to white wash our history.

Blah blah blah

Senator, you say: “Our ancestors would be astonished to learn that they were fighting for a “proposition.”
But what about this:
“Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.
Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure.”
It’s telling, Senator, that in your prepared remarks you said: “The Continental Army soldiers dying of frostbite at Valley Forge, the Pilgrims struggling to survive in the hard winter soil of Plymouth, the pioneers striking out from Missouri for the wild and dangerous frontier, the outnumbered Kentucky settlers repelling wave after wave of Indian war band attacks from behind their stockade walls—all of them would be astonished to hear that they were only fighting for a ‘proposition.’”
There is no mention of the Civil War, or, for that matter, World War II. Where are your sympathies in those conflicts?
Lincoln would have been astonished that a member of his own Republican Party would repudiate the notion that the United States is dedicated to a proposition.
The Americans who died for the Union in the Civil War, the Americans who died in World War II, would be astonished to learn that they were not fighting for a “proposition.”
It was the Confederates, and the Nazis, who fought for blood and soil, and who rejected the proposition that all people are created equal.

Pedophile protectors? The most corrupt Congress in the history of our country? The only Congress that swore an oath to a FELON instead of the Constitution.

Trump is a corrupt sociopath and elected officials like Eric have given him all their power. Then, like Eric, they are political eunuchs waiting to be told what to do and say.

Bad combover. Check. Too long red tie. Check. Orange spray tan. Check. Tiny hands. Check. Cluelessness. Check…

You were elected to represent your constituents, not to declare that everyone agrees with your racist worldview

The only apologies due are regarding how you and Trump followers are damaging this great country.

America’s heritage is more than just crusty old white men, Eric.

Ridiculous and blind and white nazi behavior

White supremacy say what?

Eric, sorry, not sorry, but this speech is disgusting. The whites who came here were colonizers, who stole the land of the indigenous people under the guise of the lie of Manifest Destiny. There’s nothing prideful about that. This country was built on the backs and by the blood and sweat of slaves, natives, and people of color. We have been fortunate that other people groups have made our country so much better. White supremacy should have been wiped out long ago, but you people continue onward with your hateful hearts. You will not prevail, because Jesus said we are to love our neighbors and good will win over evil.

Idiot

Oh? So there were air fields in the Revolutionary War, or no? Should we ask Donald? Trump claimed that President Andrew Jackson, who died in 1845, was “really angry” about the Civil War and could have prevented it had he been president later. Trump stated that the Continental Army “took over the airports” during the Revolutionary War.
We won’t abide revisionist history.

He speaks words that mean nothing …just another trumper blabbing

I want to VOMIT listening to you and your lies. You make me SICK.

Why would we apologize for taking land, resources from the people who lived here? Surely there is no reason to apoligize for killing, raping and enslaving human beings. Only when you have no soul

You fucking racist piece of shit.

Republicans never take accountability so of course you’re not sorry for a goddamn thing. You people think you’re fucking perfect when you are the ones causing harm.

YOU aren’t America dumbass. We are. And we hate you.

Eric Schmitt you are an embarrassment
America is at a crossroads, defend the constitution. Release the epstien files so the survivers can heal. Arrest 47 and the administration. Remove ice from the streets. People will lose health insurance due to the big ugly bill.medicaid and medicare saves lives. Stop lying. Stop defending trump. Stand up to trump. Stop facism. Our country is in distress. 47 is initiating martial law. 47 is an authoritarian dictator

The definition of hubris.

You’ve obviously never read a history book.

“[Eric] Schmitt is a Fascist doosh”

Campaign Finance: Melanie (r) has a friend

02 Tuesday Sep 2025

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance, Missouri General Assembly, Missouri Senate

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

30th Senate District, campaign finance, Melanie Stinnet, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, Republican

Today at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C211706 09/02/2025 Friends of Melanie Stinnett Melanie Stinnett 3928 S Meadowbrook Ave Springfield MO 65807 State of Missouri State Representative 9/2/2025 $200,000.00

[emphasis added]

Must be nice.

Running for the Missouri Senate in 2026.

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • Eric Schmitt (r): “something, something, close the barn door…”
  • Perfect timing
  • Mark Alford (r): that right wingnut echo chamber just got a lot smaller
  • Medicare for All
  • Campaign Finance: wasted money

Recent Comments

Eric Schmitt (r):… on On becoming a meme for epic st…
Campaign Finance: wa… on Missouri republicans: an etern…
Campaign Finance: wa… on Campaign Finance: no quarter
Campaign Finance: wa… on Campaign Finance: Next
Mike’s Blog Round-Up… on Mark Alford (r): you can smell…

Archives

  • November 2026
  • October 2026
  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,104,421 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...