Tags
4th Congressional District, Fascist pig, former newsreader, Mark Alford, meta, right wingnut, social media, sycophant, that ridiculous hat, Trump sycophant, voter suppression
….When a post is ratioed, it usually means many people disagree with or dislike it. This shows others that the opinion or information is controversial or unpopular. For individuals or brands, a ratioed post can hurt their reputation, as it clearly shows that most people do not support it….
Mark Alford (r) [2025 file photo]
Today:
Congressman Mark Alford
[March 17, 2026]No luck needed. Requiring proof of citizenship to vote is just common sense.
The SAVE America Act delivers the election integrity Americans demand. đ
[….]
Some of the responses:
Yessssssss..please keep making this the centerpiece of your election strategy Runty Ron Burgundyâą!! The Save Act is a performative piece of legislation that is cynically being put forth with the full knowledge that it can never pass and is just an excuse you and every MAGA party politician is laying in advance of your historic wipeout. It’s pathetic. The Dems are going to be able to run a puss filled bag of socks against you and win.
By All.means, keep it up. If by some.. miracle, you crackers could get this to pass, all of us look forward to watching the Supremes ram it down the MAGA party’s throat, AGAIN. Sad.
Elections shouldn’t depend on relying only on men’s votes. There are way too many misogynists in this country (like you), to entrust that important duty to them alone.
Implementation of Real ID started in May 2005 in the US and we still have millions of people without it. I do not recall when Missouri started.
What was the purpose of Real ID if not to prove who was a citizen? We appear to have wasted millions of dollars and hours on it as we are now told a real ID cannot be used to prove citizenship or to register to vote.
You want voters to re-register by mid- September ? How can that work?
I had to make 2 trips to get a real ID. I had passports ( my official and tourist passports), military ID, birth certificate, civilian drivers license, voter ID card and three pieces mail sent to my home address. Address on Drivers license, mail and voter ID matched.
Problem. The pieces of mail , including one from DMV were ,”to old”. I should bring in a bill or a bank statement. I had to go to or contact the bank, water District, MFA and the Electrict Cooperative and switch to paper billing so I could have pieces of mail that I could use.
Other problem- birth certificate was old/ worn and the raised seal was no longer raised. However I had passports so I was good on that.
But now after living and voting from my current address for 25 years I need to bring in documents again to prove I am eligible to vote?
I’m sure you have evidence for why we need this act. Share it with us.
Sarcasm, probably.
Can you cite the election fraud rate in Missouri? In the US?
proof of citizenship wonât GUARANTEE no fraudulent votes.
In case you need to be told⊠and it sure looks like it⊠citizens are more likely to vote fraudulently than non- citizens.
So, explain to all of us – like weâre in kindergarten – that this will stop fraud.
Do you REALLY BELIEVE that if youâre a citizen, you wonât vote fraudulently?
No, no one can. All audits and studies by both sides show there is no fraud… it’s not a new issue. Anyone someone is OBVIOUSLY about to lose they pretend this is some kind of huge issue and invent something that they HOPE will only effect people they don’t like.
Why would we put extra burden on the voters for a tiny problem that can be solved by our government with voting registrations? How many people are you going to disenfranchise to fix a problem that in the scheme of things isnât really a problem? Itâs just a ploy to make it harder for people to vote. There are bigger issues congressman Mark Alford.
Solution for a problem that doesnât exist. Show me where it has happened. Crickets
New laws shouldnât be based on imaginary problems đ€Ą
especially since there are real issues they donât WANT to fix – like out of control housing, medical, and childcare costs. The economic divide between ceos and their workers, rising costs across the board (which is going to get worse due to fuel costs).
Nah. I like married women and anyone else whoâs gone through a name change being able to vote without going through a ton of extra bureaucratic idiocy.
Do men have to do this, no they do not. Some women may not have their documents handy for various reasons ( a natural disaster , a recent divorce, a college student living away, etc). Even moreover, they may not have the time to take off work to get these things &/or the $$$ to get paperwork or passport. If the govt. really wanted to they could /should make getting these documents free for those who need it to vote, but they arenât going to help because itâs voter suppression. Statistically & ironically, red states will be affected more ( rural areas)- the votes they seek.
have voted for over 50 years. For the vast majority of those years there were no questions about election integrity. Then Trump and GOP realized that the minority population was growing faster than the white population. Ergo, elections are rigged and minorities need to be repressed. Ergo the Save Act. This is really a white supremacy act.
but they want you now to prove you was born here by showing the paper trail from birth to now if you have a name change. So those who were adopted, their parents just decided on a whim to change their name, got married, got divorced, remarried. ALL those documents that may be difficult to obtain .
none of this shit is gonna continue. This is just one of those fucking distractions from the Epstein files.
if this passes as proposed, you will now have to provide proof of citizenship as well.
==========
What is considered proof of citizenship?
For anyone whoâs changed their name – a passport.
and they are going to give those away for free right?
No. This has been another edition of Short Answers to Simple Questions.
Document Passport Application Fee
Passport Book $130
Passport Card $30
Passport Book & Card $160
But all folks who have a REAL ID (which everyone should have by now) already did this. Why make another form of ID necessary?
exactly. It’s another hoop to jump through to solve a non-existent problem, to suppress the vote for a group (married women) who generally are not voting for the Republican party.
==========
Nope. Not if you don’t have the documents. Which cost money. That’s a poll tex.
you already have to show a drivers license. This will make it be a passport or birth certificate that matches your ID. For everyone who got married and changed their name⊠thereâs a lot of women who wonât be able to vote.
Only 65% of eligible voters showed up at the polls in the last election. What in Gods name would motivate an undocumented immigrant to try to cast a ballot and risk committing a felony?
This.
[….] It is already the law that only citizens can vote. This bill does not prevent noncitizens from voting because they already don’t vote. The bill prevents millions of citizens from voting though, and moves control over voting from the states (as guaranteed in the constitution) to the federal government, so whatever the president says goes, like about who can or cannot vote, remember that his administration has already labeled democrats domestic terrorists and an illegitimate political party.
This is not freedom and liberty. He’s trying to be a dictator, control all future elections, and you are supporting that goal.
is the voter fraud in the room with us?
the constitution also says election are to be run by the states. Trumpâs save act puts me he federal government in charge of elections
all of my legal documents and current also. I donât have a passport. Iâm not interested in spending 165.00 for a passport because My real id should be enough, it wonât be. If the thugs get this passed it will be knocking out millions of women but I think thatâs their goal.
itâs a voter suppression bill.
This has nothing to do w intelligence đ€Šââïž why do yâall refuse to understand that? It is about time off work and money they donât have to spare. Ever thought about someone being in a different circumstance than you? đ
What fraud are you talking about or are you just repeating the right wing lies, the only proven fraud in the last eight years is Trump’s fake electors scheme and they were pardoned by the guy who was committing the fraud, lol.
Hope you have a passport or didnât change your name when you got married.
I jumped through all the hoops to get my Real ID as required. That should be enough!!!
How much does a passport cost?
Just because it was doable for you doesn’t mean it’s doable for others. Some people don’t have access to the documentation due to adoption or moving from a different state where you have to apply for the documentation in person and perhaps they’re too poor or they are disabled and they can’t travel to another state to get the documentation… đđ» Just đđ» because đđ» something đđ»is đđ»easy đđ» for đđ» you đđ»does đđ» not đđ»mean đđ»it’s đđ»easy đđ»for đđ» everyone.
It wasnât that easy to get a ârealâ ID. In fact, the paperwork I took with me (everything they asked me for wasnât good enough after I stood outside for 45 minutes in the rain) so I just got the regular ID, went back 4 years later and all that was needed was birth certificate, and death certificates. If the SAVE Act passes we have to make sure our name on our birth certificate matches our name on the marriage licenses. Somebody was really not thinking about the hoops women who married and took their spouses last name would have to jump through (again). Itâs utter đ đ©. Mike Lee is a moron. Those women who think theircâreal IDâ will be proof enough didnât read what the SAVE ACT does. Itâs not just to screw liberal women over, it will screw republican women too. FAFO. I hope the Democrats can reject the SAVE ACT.
I agree with you. I know women who absolutely cannot get their birth certificate due to unusual circumstances that would take too long to explain here. So they won’t be able to vote. This act has removed their ability to vote.
I’m 1000% certain they actually did think about the ramifications this would make for women. Liberal women are the largest group that does not support Republicans. This is a backhanded way of voter suppression because they are making a barrier to vote. The barrier is not equally on men, the barrier is only on women. That is intentional.
Same. I tried several years ago to get a Real ID, and even though I had everything I was told I needed, the clerk denied it and said I needed more documents. I got the regular DL that day instead. I recently decided to try again for a Real ID to return to my maiden name because of the SAVE Act. It took some doing, money, and time, but I acquired every piece of paper that first clerk said I would need. I got my name changed with Social Security first. After I received my new SS card, I went to the DMV with my big envelope of documentation for a Real ID. This time, the clerk didnât ask for some of the items the first clerk insisted I had to bring. I donât know why. In the end, I got a Real ID that matches my birth certificate. It arrived in the mail yesterday. Some people will probably question why I didnât have all the documents in my files. Well, I moved here from another state, and I have moved five times since then. Things happen, and a couple of items I thought I had werenât there anymore. And in several cases, the documents I did have werenât âofficialâ enough for the DMV clerk because they didnât have raised seals. So, I had to request and pay for new ones. So even if, in their arrogance, people are haughty enough to look down on those of us who might be missing a few documents, theyâd better check their own files to make sure all of theirs have raised seals. Those birth certificate copies their mamas gave them might not help them if they have to re-register to vote.
Under the SAVE Act, Real ID would be sufficient proof of citizenship in exactly ZERO states.
If that is your form of ID, you will ALSO need to produce your birth certificate or your naturalization certificate.
And if your birth certificate does not match your legal name (due to marriage, for example)⊠you will ALSO need to provide your Marriage certificate (or other legal certificate of name change).
And if your Real ID/drivers license does not reflect your current legal name, you will need to renew your license with the updated nameâŠand still bring your birth certificate and marriage certificate.
The projection here is palpable.
âCommon senseâ is not trying to fix a problem you donât have.
Then roll out free and easily accessible ways to get id. If this were truly about ID and not concerned about the midterms that would be a part of the deal.
Whatâs common sense is looking beyond the surface level of anything a MAGA politician says and finding out what itâs really about
Our elections are accurate. The Republicans are just worried theyâll lose the midterms when women come out in force.
Way to work on fake problems đ They are easier to fix, because they arenât even real.
No it doesnt. Its specifically set up so republican opponents have a harder time voting. Trump has even been quoted saying that if they get this passed, republicans would never lose again. Its not about election integrity. Its about rigging it for trumps cronies
Elections shouldnât depend on poll taxes disguised as election integrity measures.
Due to gerry mandering, how do you factor “luck” into this?
So give every citizen their proof for free
Elections shouldnât depend on corrected identification for married women or toting around my birth certificate or passport, either. Stop trying to handpick the universe of voters. Try pushing legislation that solves problems for all Americans, instead.
Except that this isnât anything thatâs promoted AND it places a poll tax (by not having a free option for voter ID) on itâs citizens.
Please pony up the funds for passports for every Missouri citizen then on YOUR dime. Oh and fast track the approval of them all.
Elections should not depend on voter suppression and gerrymandering!
Too late.
In other words you want a favorable result guaranteed. Yeah, no.
Oh, bless your heart.
a lot of people seem focused on their “safety” rather than their freedom. Lots of people make excuses to sacrifice their constitutional rights to feel like they are protected while losing their legitimate protections as a country and citizens from a power hungry government
What he’s not saying is that it will “fix” elections for his side to win.
It will stop more legitimate voters in a single precinct than all the illegitimate voters who have cast a ballot over the last 25 years.
And, how does a married woman who took her husband’s name use a birth certificate to prove she’s that person and OK to register? Agree with others: fixing a non-issue is a diversion to the real goals.
Elections also shouldn’t depend on voter suppression!
Too late.
Women shouldnât have to do anything to vote that men donât. This SAVE ACT is insane. I choose the Constitution!
I choose the Constitution.
Solution desperately seeking a problem?
Don’t forget about the women you represent. Do they all have passports? Have they all kept their maiden names?
Non-issue.
We already have election integrity.
The way to mess it up is to take the authority away from each state and give it to the federal government.
Hey Mark why don’t you put into the bill that the Government will pay for the required IDs to vote? Common sense
We all know the answer to that.
Making passports free????
Nope. It’s just voter suppression trying to disguise itself as election security. Fuck that.
According to the Heritage Foundation, they found about 1000 non-citizens who voted in all elections across the entire US in decades. You do the math and figure out whether it is worth creating problems for citizens to vote because of this.
The SAVE Act is not about voter ID. Itâs about voter registration suppression and the federal government wanting our state voter rolls.
If a true assertion, then married men should also require an official birth certificate and/or valid passport.
if you move precincts or change parties or get âaccidentlyâ knocked off the voter rolls, you have to re-register. The bill is to create chaos for a problem that does not exist at a significant level.
Poll tax.
How weird that liars want to say that existent voter registration is luck.
The Heritage Foundation found 68 cases of voter fraud since the 1980s.
68 out of billions of votes cast.
Let’s call this what it is…a poll tax to prevent women and minorities from voting.
You mean the voter suppression act?
Is it also a common sense to make it significantly more difficult for women to exercise the same voting right than it is for men?
Elections shouldn’t depend on one party trying to purge the other from the voting roles. Americans should be allowed to vote. You should make it easier, not harder and certainly it should not cost us money.
It attacks women and poor income citizens. Not everyone can afford a passport
You shouldn’t have to pay to vote
It is unconstitutional to make people pay a poll tax because they changed their last name to their husband! If you are a woman with your husband’s last name you need to buy a passport.
You show proof of citizenship when you register to vote. What you are suggesting is a poll tax which goes directly against our constitution. Not that ANY of you have read it.
Admit youâre just trying to suppress the vote.
Not every married woman has a passport. Passports cost money that some people don’t have in their budgets. $150-200 is a weeks worth of groceries for two people now that groceries are so high.
Show your proof of voter fraud. Specific instance of non American citizens voting. I’ll wait.
It is obvious that the SAVE ACT is a voter suppression act. Otherwise, why the rush to pass it and have it become law immediately? Could it be because republicans are afraid they will lose at the next election? Could you just be honest to your constituents for once in your life? Trump is afraid of what will happen if the Republicans lose the majority in Congress. We can see his fear by the amount of threats he is lodging against Republicans in Congress demanding that this act be passed. What is the rush???
Men taking the women’s vote again
And they try and convince you they are not a cult.
Itâs an anti woman bill and a poll tax. Unconstitutional because they donât want a drivers license. They want a birth certificate matching your last name and women, depending on number of name changes, will have to produce all that paperwork. Itâs not free or easy or fast to acquire either.
Not an issue! Go fix problems we are really having. Struggling with affordable healthcare and housing, also a living wage to buy groceries for our families. Quit wasting our time on trying to enact a poll tax.
Then half of the US population won’t be able to vote
SAVE is the result of the scam started by the great cult leader when he lost. States already have methods of verifying citizenship, and illegal voting by noncitizens is very rare. The Heritage Foundation, a right-wing think tank that supports the law, maintains a database of election fraud. The database contains 99 instances of ineligible voting by noncitizens since 1982!
The bill also threatens to disenfranchise eligible voters. Only about half the population holds a passport, and many do not have access to their birth certificate (which would not even be sufficient for a woman who changed her name at marriage).
Never! Voter suppression act!
Is it saving America, or is it just saving your asses from the midterms?
Poll TaxâŠ
Election fraud is not an issue. Stop trying to make up reasons to disenfranchise women voters.
Let me explain it to the idiots who dont read the bill. If your name doesnât match your birth certificate, you need something else that is approved to prove you are an American citizen. In these states a Real ID will work, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Vermont, and Washington. If you dont live in those states you will need to get a passport. That will cost about $200. That is a problem in today’s economy. This will hurt the married women, people who have changed their names, and the poor. It amounts to a poll tax which is illegal.
The SAVE Act has nothing to do with stopping voter fraud. Itâs about stopping legal voters from casting their ballots, and ultimately laying the groundwork for Trump to block certification of any election results he doesnât like, just like he tried to do on January 6, 2021. Itâs voter suppression plain and simple.
No. Poll. Tax.
Itâs illegal.
So when is he invading Cuba?
Itâs a poll tax. Drivers licenses are not valid ID in the proposal so you need a passport or verified copy of a birth certificate both of which are costly. A passport is over $140. And if you changed your name (married women), you need verified copies of your marriage change of name from where you were married. Both costly and inconvenient for any women who moved. It is estimated that this affects 10% of all voters.
Reviews of 10 years of votes in Utah recently uncovered something like 20 illegally cast votes (only one by a non-citizen, the rest were out of district votes).
There are 1,600,000+ voters in Utah.
To weed out 2-3 voters this bill disenfranchises up to 150,000 voters. It is voter suppression (particularly women and poor), not security.
The SAVE act will only save fascists who want to restrict access to voting
Yeah and elections shouldn’t depend on this atrocity of a bill. Basically admitting if they pass the save they ass act it will disenfranchise voters. You go to vote as usual and upon giving your name you find out for some unexplained reason you aren’t registered as this bill also requires all states to turnover voter rolls and purge voter rolls every 30 days and not require notification. Now who carries their passport or birth certificate every day, causing frustration and causing the voter to just not vote. That is their plan for this voter suppression bill.
You can’t force pay to play for voting, you either need to accept that voter fraud isn’t a problem and abandon this farce or you need to make getting the required identification free with government programs in place to freely and readily commute citizens to the locations where they can get these and make it so that their employers must pay them while they’re doing so if they have to do it while they would otherwise be working. Anything less is a poll tax and completely unconstitutional.
A solution without a problem, just to distract from Taco’s needless war, tariff debacle, Epstein involvement, affordability crisis, stagnant growth- we can go on and on…
Not being able to use a driver’s license to register will hinder about 10% from being able to vote. A passport or birth certificate should not be the only methods for registering to vote. You are for limiting the participants so you can cheat to win.
Itâs already required. What you are doing is suppressing and disenfranchising voters. Trump has proven since 2020 that our elections are as safe as they ever been. Case after case, court after court has proven that. Iâm guessing you are no longer a Republican since you are so much in favor of Big Government and limited 2nd Amendment rights. Good to know when voting.
How about addressing REAL problems, not ones you make up
I, as a woman, should not have to jump through hoops to vote when men won’t be affected at all. Its a poll tax and it discrimination against married women or anyone else who had a LEGAL name change. I have been voting since I was 18 years old. I have updated my registration as my name has changed amd provided legal documents to do so. There is no reason do be forced to do it again. There is no voter fraud issue to be addressed. It is a non issue. But we do have a felon sending our troops into an illegal war to cover up for his SA of children, while lining his pockets with our taxes dollars. Maybe that’s the issue you should be investigating.
So you’re passing a law to make something thats already illegal and not happening illegal. Or maybe its really about disenfranchising american voters so republicans have even more of an unfair advantage while still claiming we have a democracy when we actually have authoritarian fascism for a government.
You magas are always focused on non existent problems. Real problems too hard, or do the billionaires object?
Voter suppression bill, this administration is so unpopular they feel the need to to further tip the scale to win
You keep using those words, âcommon sense,â and I donât think you know what they mean.
Common sense is knowing that this is a made up problem where the âsolutionâ is to disenfranchise voters you donât like
Please explain to me how it is fair for a married man not to have to show as much documentation to vote as a married woman who changed her last name. And please explain to me how this required documentation, that many have to pay for, is not a poll tax.
I am from Missouri. Please show me how wide-spread voter fraud is.
And also show me where it is currently legal for non-citizens to vote.
Please show me the problem this legislation will fix.
So you’re coming out and saying that you want rigged elections?
Mark Alford (r) [2024 file photo].
