• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Tag Archives: Jim Lembke

Campaign Finance: cheaper by the dozen

06 Wednesday Jul 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

campaign finance, Jim Lembke, Missouri Ethics Commission, misssouri, PAC, right wingnuts

Today at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C211547 07/06/2022 The 100 PAC James Onder 110 East Lockwood Ave St Louis MO 63119 Onder Law LLC Founder, Attorney 7/6/2022 $100,000.00

[emphasis added]

Who? What?

The 100 PAC – Active
MECID: C211547
2977 State Highway K Suite 281
O’Fallon, MO 63368
[….]
Committee Type:Political Action

Committee Information History
The 100 PAC
12026 Manchester Road
Saint Louis , MO 63131

[….]
From – To
1/6/2021 – 1/31/2022
Treasurer
Jim Lembke
14768 D NE St. Rt E
Adrian, MO 64720
[….]

Information
Reports
Committee Officers
Officer Title Address
Jim Lembke Chairman 2977 State Highway K Suite 281 O’Fallon, MO 63368
[….]

That’s a lot of cheeseburgers.

Investing in popcorn futures

12 Saturday Feb 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in Missouri General Assembly, Missouri Senate

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Bill Eigel, congressional reapportionment, Dave Schatz, Jim Lembke, Mike Cierpiot, missouri, right wingnuts, Rudi Keller

Now is the time.

Mike Cierpiot (r) [2017 file photo].

Posted this morning:

Rudi Keller @RudiKellerMI
After @MikeCierpiot attacked Jim Lembke on the #MoSenate floor Thursday, @BillEigel became so enraged the two had to be physically separated in @DaveSchatzMO’s office #moleg #redistricting #factions
[….]
9:27 AM · Feb 12, 2022

We heard something like that, too. To paraphrase:

[….] shouting [….] a policeman ran in [….] no punches were thrown [….]

Heh.

Pass the popcorn.

Indeed.

Previously:

Math is hard, proportional representation is evil, Missouri voters are stupid (February 4, 2020)

Math is hard – “…yup I’m from Missouri yup…” (February 5, 2022)

You never have to answer your phone when it’s off the hook (February 7, 2022)

Mom, apple pie, the convertibility of silver… (February 11, 2022)

Election 2012: 1st Senate District

08 Thursday Nov 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

1st Senate District, 2012, Jim Lembke, missouri, Scott Sifton

Via the Missouri Secretary of State:

State Senator – District 1 (106 of 106 Precincts Reported)

Scott Sifton Democrat 45,486 50.9%

Jim Lembke Republican 43,858 49.1%

Total Votes 89,344

[emphasis added]

Yes, this Jim Lembke (r) will no longer serve in the Missouri Senate come January.

Scott Sifton (D), the Senator-elect, will have a different agenda (from his campaign web site):

….”Lobbyists shower gifts, meals and trips on elected officials for one reason – it works,” said Scott Sifton. “There aren’t lobbyists for ordinary citizens in Jefferson City. We need to take the gifts-for-access model off the table.”

Sifton has never accepted a meal, trip or gift from a lobbyist – and he never will.

Sifton continued, “I agree with Republican State Senator John Lamping (R-24), who was quoted, ‘We, as elected officials, need to hold ourselves to the highest standards.'” Lamping, like Sifton, accepts no gifts, no trips, and no free meals.

“My first piece of legislation I file will be a total ban on lobbyist gifts to legislators, their staffs and their families. It has to stop.” Sifton concluded.

[emphasis added]

That would be a good start.

Campaign Finance: someone thinks republicans are vulnerable

23 Sunday Sep 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

19th Senate District, 1st Senate District, campaign finance, Jim Lembke, Kurt Schaefer, Mary Still, missouri, Scott Sifton

Somebody must think there are vulnerable republicans in the Missouri Senate. The past few days at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C091061 09/22/2012 SCOTT SIFTON FOR SENATE Missouri Democratic State Committee State Account PO Box 719 Jefferson City MO 65102 9/22/2012 $7,500.00

C091061 09/22/2012 SCOTT SIFTON FOR SENATE Democratic Senatorial Committee PO Box 7319 Columbia MO 65205 9/22/2012 $25,000.00

C081050 09/23/2012 MARY STILL FOR SENATE MO Senate Democratic Campaign Committee PO Box 7319 Columbia MO 65205 9/22/2012 $25,000.00

[emphasis added]

The candidates in the 1st Senate District:

State Senator – District 1

Democrat

Scott Sifton 9814 BERWICK PL ST LOUIS MO 63123 3/27/2012

Republican

Jim Lembke 812 ANN LYNN CT ST LOUIS MO 63125 3/20/2012

[emphasis added]

The candidates in the 19th Senate District:

State Senator – District 19

Democrat

Mary Wynne Still PO BOX 933 COLUMBIA MO 65205 2/28/2012

Republican

Kurt Schaefer PO BOX 1614 COLUMBIA MO 65205 2/28/2012

[emphasis added]

The latest summaries, in the 1st Senate District:

C010450: Lembke For Senate

Information Reported On: 2012 – 30 Day After Primary Election-8/7/2012

Beginning Money on Hand $308,626.64

Ending Money On Hand $332,584.66

[emphasis added]

C091061: Scott Sifton For Senate

Information Reported On: 2012 – 30 Day After Primary Election-8/7/2012

Beginning Money on Hand $9,240.08

Monetary Receipts $110,995.11

Ending Money On Hand $36,336.62

[emphasis added]

In the 19th Senate District:

C081145: Citizens To Elect Kurt Schaefer

Information Reported On: 2012 – 30 Day After Primary Election-8/7/2012

Beginning Money on Hand $556,849.12

Ending Money On Hand $590,975.02

 [emphasis added]

C081050: Mary Still For Senate

Information Reported On: 2012 – 30 Day After Primary Election-8/7/2012

Beginning Money on Hand $138,893.39

Ending Money On Hand $149,597.04

[emphasis added]

The republicans have all the money the need. The Democratic candidates have demonstrated an ability to raise money. These races are going to be very interesting to watch.

Eddie Haskell and Lumpy Rutherford go to Washington (and Jefferson City)

11 Tuesday Sep 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Brian Nieves, Ed Martin, Eddie Haskell, Jim Lembke, Joe Walsh, John Danforth, Leave it to Beaver, Lumpy Rutherford, missouri, Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan, Republican Party, Roy Blunt, Steve King

When I was about thirteen years old, I used to faithfully watch the TV series Leave it to Beaver. The series centered on a family, the Cleavers, who, according to Wikipedia, exemplified “the idealized suburban family of the mid-20th century.” I, however, watched because I thought Beaver’s big brother, Wally, was the cutest boy ever. My crush didn’t last too long, but I can still remember all the characters on the show. Which is why I had a real aha moment when Jonathan Bernstein noted the resemblance between a character on the show, Eddie Haskell, and GOP Veep candidate Paul Ryan. After some thought, it occurred to me that both Eddie and his sidekick on the show, Lumpy Rutherford, foils to the too-good-to-be true Cleaver boys, have a lot in common with many members of today’s Republican Party.

For those of you who are too young to have watched Leave it to Beaver, which aired between 1957 and 1963, this description of Eddie captures the critical points:

Eddie’s two trademarks are his unctuous politeness to adults and his weasly, sharp-tongued meanness to everybody else. He is a model white-collar delinquent, a creep who goads people into trouble rather than perpetrating the crime himself. He was a born shirker, not worker, and a strain on any parent, especially his own long-suffering mother and father, Agnes and George. […] but really, when it comes to Eddie, when you’ve said “creep,” you’ve said it all.

Just think of Ryan trotting his 78 year old Mother out before the old folks in Florida, talking up the need to keep Medicare safe from Obama, with nary a word about his plan to destroy the program in all but name. Or think about all his smarmy lies during the Republican convention. Pure Eddie. Missouri’s Roy Blunt also has his Eddie Haskell moments, kissing up to rich, corporate types, sidestepping the hard questions with GOP talking points and pious bromides, delivering a swift kick in the behind to those who have nothing he wants, while pretending, after years as a Washington socialite, that he’s still a down-home boy. Romney, himself, the etch-a-sketch king of mendacity, surely qualifies as the archetypal Eddie.

Clarence “Lumpy” Rutherford, the second Leave it to Beaver character that comes to mind, is an equally common type in the GOP. Lumpy has been described as follows:

… he is the first bully that the Cleaver boys must deal with. Pretty soon his true cowardly, lumbering self shows through, and they see him for a kind of harmless buffoon. As he continues to “swell up,” everybody gets a good laugh at Lumpy’s expense, but as long as he’s getting his three squares and a few snacks in-between and his father is not yelling at him to much, he’s a happy enough boob, sporting a silly sort of dodo’s grin. When things are going poorly, which is most of the time, he still whines for his “Daddy.

Although Lumpy happily carried out Eddie Haskell’s mean-minded schemes without a thought, he never really understood the goals of the underlying plan. He just wanted to hang with the guys and be accepted.

We’ve got lots of Lumpys here in Missouri. If Ed Martin were fictional, I’d have suspected that the author based his character on Lumpy. Jim Lembke? Maybe. Brian Nieves is perhaps a tad too angry, potentially violent and unstable, but otherwise he fits the criteria – although on second thought, he’s actually more like a Lumpy who thinks he’s an Eddie.

On the national scene, I’d suggest politicians like Joe Walsh, who thinks the way to answer Sandra Fluke’s critique of the GOP is to tell her to get a job, and Steve King. They’re both mean, not too bright, and more than willing to do the dirty work that comes their way. King actually tried to come to Todd Akin’s rescue until he figured out that the big guys weren’t heading in that direction and it was wiser to back off. Romney recently endorsed his re-election effort, declaring that “I want him as my partner in Washington!” Eddie and Lumpy, together again.

There are, of course, folks in the Republican Party who aren’t conniving or bullies, people more like the Cleaver boy’s parents. They’re conventional, kind, if a bit smug, not at all evil, but just somewhat blinkered when it comes to reality. For example, just like Wally and the Beaver’s dad who was always kind to the hapless Lumpy, elder GOP statesman John Danforth endorsed Ed Martin. While these folks seem to find the Eddie Haskells and Lumpy Rutherfords in their party distasteful, they are also mostly unwilling to risk the wrath of these new GOPers who have usurped the more genteel Republican party of yesteryear.      

Campaign Finance: five more an it’d be a right wingnut dozen

02 Monday Jul 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

2012, campaign finance, Club for Growth, David Sater, Doug Libla, Ed Emery, Ellen Brandom, Jim Lembke, Mike McGhee, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, Rex Sinquefield, right wingnuts, Ward Franz

Rex’s right wingnut seven.

This past weekend at the Missouri Ethics’s Commission:

C121090 06/29/2012 CITIZENS FOR ED EMERY Missouri Club for Growth P O Box 2068 St Louis MO 63158 6/29/2012 $40,000.00

C111070 06/29/2012 SATER FOR SENATE Missouri Club for Growth Board PAC P O Box 2068 St Louis MO 63158 6/29/2012 $10,000.00

C111154 06/30/2012 DOUG LIBLA FOR SENATE Missouri Club for Growth P O Box 2068 St Louis MO 63158 5/29/2012 $10,000.00

C010450 06/30/2012 LEMBKE FOR SENATE Missouri Club for Growth PO Box 2068 St Louis MO 63158 6/29/2012 $10,000.00

C051254 06/30/2012 MCGHEE FOR SENATE Missouri Club for Growth P.O. Box 2068 St Louis MO 63158 6/29/2012 $40,000.00

C051162 07/01/2012 FRIENDS OF ELLEN BRANDOM Missouri Club for Growth PO Box 2068 StLouis MO 63158 6/29/2012 $40,000.00

C041065 07/01/2012 FRIENDS OF WARD FRANZ Missouri Club For Growth P.O. Box 2068 Saint Louis MO 63158 6/30/2012 $10,000.00

[emphasis added]

That’s $160,000.00.

What about Gary Romine (r)? Well, it’s possible that the check is in the mail.

Previously: Campaign Finance: somebody doesn’t like Sen. David Pearce (r) (June 30, 2012)  

Campaign Finance: what happens when you're unopposed

31 Saturday Mar 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

1st Senate District, Jim Lembke, missouri

You spend a lot of cash propping up someone who will actually have an opponent in the general election.

Previously: Campaign Finance: money is not a problem (March 29, 2012)

From the Missouri Secretary of State:

State Senator – District 15

Republican

Eric Schmitt 937 BROWNELL AVE

ST LOUIS MO 63122 742 2/28/2012

Unopposed.

State Senator – District 23

Republican

Tom Dempsey 3103 BUCKSKIN PATH

ST CHARLES MO 63301 2/29/2012

Unopposed.

What happens? Today, at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C010450 03/31/2012 LEMBKE FOR SENATE Dempsey For Senate Two Westbury Dr St Charles MO 63301 3/30/2012 $25,000.00

C010450 03/31/2012 LEMBKE FOR SENATE Schmitt For Senate PO Box220722 Kirkwood MO 63122 3/30/2012 $25,000.00

[emphasis added]

This is why, failing everything else, the party which is in the minority should have placeholders file for office against the majority’s incumbents.

Campaign Finance: money is not a problem

29 Thursday Mar 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

1st Senate District, 2012, campaign finance, Jim Lembke, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission

Today, at the Missouri Ethics Commission [pdf]:

CONTRIBUTION OF MORE THAN $5,000.00 RECEIVED BY ANY COMMITTEE FROM ANY SINGLE DONOR – TO BE FILED WITHIN 48 HOURS OF RECEIVING THE CONTRIBUTION

C010450 LEMBKE FOR SENATE 3/29/2012

Missouri Senate Campaign Committee

P.O. Box 754

Jefferson City , MO 65102 3/28/2012

$100,000.00

[emphasis added]

Well, that’s interesting. They seem to have all the money they need.

The candidates in the 1st Senate District:

State Senator – District 1

Democrat

Sue Schoemehl PO BOX 510376

ST LOUIS MO 63151 510 2/28/2012

Michael Vogt 6035 WEBER RD

ST LOUIS MO 63123 2/29/2012

Scott Sifton 9814 BERWICK PL

ST LOUIS MO 63123 3/27/2012

Republican

Jim Lembke 812 ANN LYNN CT

ST LOUIS MO 63125 3/20/2012

Sen. Jim Lembke (r): For a few bottles of Late Harvest Vignoles, then?

24 Friday Feb 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

cheesbuger, Jim Lembke, missouri, wine

This is going to become a much quoted classic line in the history of Missouri politics:

I-Team: Sen. Jim Lembke says his vote can’t be bought with cheeseburgers

11:41 PM, Feb 23, 2012

“….My position is that I can’t be influenced by someone buying me a cheeseburger,” said Lembke, who sat down with NewsChannel 5 for a lengthy interview.

But it wasn’t all cheeseburgers.

In 2011, lobbyists reported giving Sen. Lembke 107 meals and gifts, including a $350 golf outing paid for by AT&T. The Plumbers and Pipefitters Local #562 bought him a meal for $100. Another lobbyist bought him a $120 bottle of wine….

[emphasis added]

The cheeseburger part, that is.

It’s been a good week, eh?:

Conservative Local Lawmakers Left Behind by Redistricting

Jordan Shapiro

February 23, 2012 6:00 PM

….Sen. Jim Lembke, R-St. Louis County, would still live within his current district, but would be facing a more Democratic leaning electorate. Like Cunningham, Lembke’s term expires this year.

“I am very surprised and disappointed,” Lembke said….

As if redistricting is supposed to protect incumbents? This couldn’t have happened to a more deserving person.

And all sorts of folks are piling on.

If you want a friend in politics, get a dog.

Bill Randles: Holy shades of Jim Lembke!

02 Thursday Feb 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Anastasio Somoza, Bill Randles, budget cuts, Jim Lembke, Medicaid, missouri, Nicaragua, Spending, Tax policy

A recent news article about Bill Randles, one of the not-so-fab GOPers vying for the gubernatorial nomination, reminds me of a story I heard somewhere about the Nicaraguan Dictator, Anastasio Somoza. According to the story, which works metaphorically though I can’t swear to its accuracy, Somoza opposed letting a charity distribute shoes to barefoot Nicaraguan peasants – he claimed they maintained an essential spiritual contact with the soul of Nicaragua through the contact of their bare feet with Nicaraguan soil. Of course Somoza himself and all his family wore shoes. Given the amount of loot he managed to expropriate from the Nicaraguan people, I assume that they were probably very expensive shoes.

I’m not suggesting that Bill Randles wants to be Missouri’s dictator or that he has the brutal proclivities of Somoza, a man about whom the epithet “butcher” does butchers the world over a grave injustice. I will point out, though, that as a Harvard educated lawyer, he’s probably doing pretty well for himself. Which makes it all the more troublesome that he’s apparently channeling the spirit of Bill Lembke, the mean-minded twit who was willing to turn Missouri’s long-term unemployed out into the streets in order to make some inane point about government spending. But there it is: Randles has stated that if elected, “he would deny federal funds for education, the environment, health care, and, eventually, Medicaid.”

Why, given the poor state of Missouri’s finances, would anyone refuse to let the federal government return some of the money paid to it by Missouri taxpayers? How, given the over-the-barrell condition of the current state budget,  can Randle prattle about preferring to let Missouri devise its own Medicaid alternative? He claims that if the state succumbs to federal demands, “Medicaid will occupy too much of the state budget in the near future.” In other words, to hell with the people Medicaid serves – too many of them, so too damn bad for them.  

Seems that Randles, like Mitt Romney, isn’t worried about poor people. Romney claims that his lack of concern stems from his belief that they have an ample social safety-net, while, out of the other side of his mouth, he promises spending cuts that would savage the safety net. Mr. Randles, for his part, declares with a straight face that, in order to bring down health care costs, he would “change requirements for emergency rooms so that they are only required to treat uninsured patients for life-threatening injuries.” Forget about maintaining the only avenue for health care open to those folks Republicans are hell-bent on keeping uninsured.

Randles states that the federal government may “send money, but they require us to spend more money to get it. So you have to say at some point, ‘what is this deal worth’?” Based on this assertion, I would guess that Randles not only has problems with basic math, but also might not be absolutely open about his real priorities which are, clearly, to kill social spending that might threaten tax “relief” for rich businessmen.

Like Somoza, who sacrificed the welfare of Nicaraguan farmers in the service of a patriotic fantasy about the Nicaraguan soul, Randles is willing to not only sacrifice the welfare of Missourians, but their federal tax dollars in the service of a fantasy about preserving the state from the debilitating effects of that right-wing bogey, “big government.” Like the Somozas, who were more than willing to forego the spiritual properties of Nicaraguan soil and prance around the country fully-shod, the consequences of Randles’ high-minded effort to divorce Missouri from federal dollars is very unlikely to affect well-off Kansas City lawyers in the same way that it will affect the average Missourian.

As an afterthought, there’s one more story about Somoza that might be apropos here. When asked why his government spent so little on education for the largely rural and illiterate Nicaraguans, he replied that he didn’t want them educated, they were, afterall, only oxen. Draw your own conclusions.

← Older posts

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 774,593 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

 

Loading Comments...