• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Tag Archives: Supreme Court

Crazy old man shouts at clouds

16 Friday May 2025

Posted by Michael Bersin in social media

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

14th Amendment, Birthright citizenship, Donald Trump, Fascist pig, immigration, social media, Supreme Court

Bad combover. Check. Too long red tie. Check. Orange spray tan. Check. Tiny hands. Check. Cluelessness. Check. Conviction. Check.

This morning:

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump

THE SUPREME COURT IS BEING PLAYED BY THE RADICAL LEFT LOSERS, WHO HAVE NO SUPPORT, THE PUBLIC HATES THEM, AND THEIR ONLY HOPE IS THE INTIMIDATION OF THE COURT, ITSELF. WE CAN’T LET THAT HAPPEN TO OUR COUNTRY!

474 ReTruths 1.77k Likes May 16, 2025, 8:35 AM

All caps is the Internet equivalent of shouting.

Too funny

02 Tuesday Jul 2024

Posted by Michael Bersin in Congress, Mark Alford, social media

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

4th Congressional District, Donald Trump, dumbass, Fascist pig, former newsreader, Mark Alford, missouri, right wingnut, social media, Steve Bannon, Supreme Court, sycophant

A very strange hill to plant your flag on, Mark (r).

Mark Alford (r) [2023 file photo].

Yesterday:

Congressman Mark Alford
[July 1, 2024]
Steve Bannon is a political prisoner.
Biden has weaponized the government against his political opponents, and turned the Department of Justice upside down.
Bannon followed his lawyer’s counsel, and the J6 select committee was illegitimate.
This is a disgrace to our country.

A few days earlier, an order from the U.S. Supreme Court:

(ORDER LIST: 603 U.S.)
FRIDAY, JUNE 28, 2024
ORDER IN PENDING CASE
23A1129 BANNON, STEPHEN K. V. UNITED STATES
The application for release pending appeal presented to The
Chief Justice and by him referred to the Court is denied.

Some of the responses to Mark Alford (r):

Are you planning on doing stand-up when your political career ends? You post some funny stuff.

And after this prison sentence is the trial for defrauding people into donating to build a wall. which he used to live a lavish lifestyle. MAGA…only the best people.

Steve Bannon, Peter Navarro, Michael Cohen, Paul Manafort, George Papadopoulos, Roger Stone, Rick Gates, Alan Weisselberg all sentenced to prison, yes Trump pardoned some of them while Sidney Powell, Kenneth Chesebro and Scott Hall took plea deals to testify against co-defendants. Many other Trump lawyers are also facing serious charges. Meanwhile Trump boasts he hires only the best people. “Pity for the guilty is treason to the innocent.” [….]

Let’s not forget America’s Bankrupt Mayor will be having his turn with the “serious charges.”

We now have the great of embarrassment of having Alford in the same breath as Boebert, Greene, and Gaetz.

like Gym Jordan?

Good. You break the law you go to jail.

Congressman Mark Alford did you get your law degree from Trump University?

He should ask for his money back.

Or did he drop out?

Someone who has so little respect for our judicial system does not belong in Congress.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito in January 2006: “There is nothing that is more important for our republic than the rule of law. No person in this country, no matter how high or powerful, is above the law.”

The party of law and order!!!!

Lies lies lies.

#LockHimUp!

You are a disgrace!

Marky, sit down and shut the fuck up. Bannon isn’t a political prisoner. He was put in jail for failing to follow a Congressional summons. That is called breaking the law in this country. You break the law you do your time.

You’re incompetent and a disgrace.
Not surprised at all by your asinine statement, shilling for crumb.

Congressman Mark Alford, you’re such an IDIOT

You are a delusional supporter of traitors.

The Supreme Court you were licking on for the immunity of your master told Bannon no.

Heh. There’s that.

Mark , I do not think ,your drunk ass friend is liked in the forth district,your need to rest from all your ego lifting,take the day off

Steve Bannon is an adult. He made his choices. Including the choice to defy Congressional subpoenas at the risk of incarceration.
Bannon got what the rule of law proscribed.
It is also what the Rule of Trump always leads to. (The Rule of Trump is that Trump has the Fecal Touch – everything he touches turns to shit.)
And there’s a laundry list of loyal supporters who can tell you the same.

Bad combover. Check. Too long red tie. Check. Orange spray tan. Check. Tiny hands. Check. Cluelessness. Check…

Oh, Mark. You’re a farce.
It’s laughable that you claim Biden is weaponizing the legal system. That’s exactly what Donny did and will do again if elected.
That’s called projection, and you’re very good at it.

I’d say Alford projects often, not that he’s good at it…..

Heh.

Steve Bannon is a criminal who was corruptly pardoned by President Trump. He should have been tried and convicted for the We Build the Wall scam with the three other men who didn’t get pardoned by his buddy, Donald Trump. I suppose that left him feeling like he was above the law and so he ignored a subpoena from Congress. No one is above the law, Mark. No one.

Well, now, because of the six wingnut majority on the U.S. Supreme Court Donald Trump (r) is.

Oh ffs.

Mark the Supreme Court refused to save him last week. He refused subpoenas from congress of which you are a member of. That same Supreme Court gave your dictator wannabe some immunity. Was that an example of Biden weaponizing the government? If he is manipulating the Justice dept like rump did in office, why didn’t he in his son’s case? Your logic, judgment and morals are seriously flawed Mark. You believe laws only apply to some people and not your cult. You have betrayed your oath of office and I’m ashamed you horribly represent us in Missouri.

Mark Alford (r) [2023 file photo].

The real populist

02 Tuesday Jul 2024

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

dissent, Donald Trump, immunity, Joe Biden, presidential immunity, Supreme Court

Joe Biden (D) [2020 file photo].

Yesterday.

The White House
Washington

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
July 2, 2024

REMARKS BY PRESIDENT BIDEN
ON THE SUPREME COURT’S IMMUNITY RULING

Cross Hall

(July 1, 2024)

7:45 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT: Good evening.

The presidency is the most powerful office in the world. It’s an office that not only tests your judgment, perhaps even more importantly it’s an office that can test your character because you not only face moments where you need the courage to exercise the full power of the presidency, you also face moments where you need the wisdom to respect the limits of the power of the office of the presidency.

This nation was founded on the principle that there are no kings in America. Each — each of us is equal before the law. No one — no one is above the law, not even the president of the United States.

With today’s Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity, that fundamentally changed. For all — for all practical purposes, today’s decision almost certainly means that there are virtually no limits on what a president can do.

This is a fundamentally new principle, and it’s a dangerous precedent because the power of the office will no longer be constrained by the law, even including the Supreme Court of the United States. The only limits will be self-imposed by the president alone.

This decision today has continued the Court’s attack in recent years on a wide range of long-established legal principles in our nation, from gutting voting rights and civil rights to taking away a woman’s right to choose to today’s decision that undermines the rule of law of this nation.

Nearly four years ago, my predecessor sent a violent mob to the U.S. Capitol to stop the peaceful transfer of power. We all saw it with our own eyes. We sat there and watched it happen that day. Attack on the police. The ransacking of the Capitol. A mob literally hunting down the House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi. Gallows erected to hang the vice president, Mike Pence. I think it’s fair to say it was one of the darkest days in the history of America.

Now the man who sent that mob to the U.S. Capitol is facing potential criminal conviction for what happened that day. And the American people deserve to have an answer in the courts before the upcoming election. The public has a right to know the answer about what happened on January 6th before they ask to vote again this year.

Now, because of today’s decision, that is highly, highly unlikely. It’s a terrible disservice to the people of this nation.

So, now — now the American people have to do what the Court should have been willing to do but would not. The America people have to render a judgment about Donald Trump’s behavior. The American people must decide whether Donald Trump’s assault on our democracy on January 6th makes him unfit for public office in the highest office in the land. The American people must decide if Trump’s embrace of violence to preserve his power is acceptable.

Perhaps most importantly, the American people must decide if they want to entrust the president — once again, the presidency to Donald Trump, now knowing he’ll be even more emboldened to do whatever he pleases whenever he wants to do it.

You know, at the outset of our nation, it was the character of George Washington, our first president, that defined the presidency. He believed power was limited, not absolute, and that power would always reside with the people — always.

Now, over 200 years later, with today’s Supreme Court decision, once again it will depend on the character of the men and women who hold that presidency that are going to define the limits of the power of the presidency, because the law will no longer do it.

I know I will respect the limits of the presidential power, as I have for three and a half years. But any president, including Donald Trump, will now be free to ignore the law.

I concur with Justice Sotomayor’s dissent today. She — here’s what she said. She said, “In every use of official power, the president is now a king above the law. With fear for our democracy, I dissent,” end of quote.

So should the American people dissent. I dissent.

May God bless you all. And may God help preserve our democracy. Thank you. And may God protect our troops.

7:49 P.M. EDT

There is a difference. Vote for the decent person over the Fascist narcissist. That’s your stark choice in November.

Fifty years in the making

02 Tuesday Jul 2024

Posted by Michael Bersin in social media

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

John Dean, Richard Nixon, social media, Supreme Court

Yesterday:

John W. Dean @JohnWDean

“When the president does it, that means that it is not illegal.”

Richard Nixon, 1974

Affirmed, US Supreme Court, 2024

10:22 AM · Jul 1, 2024

It’s their world, the rest of us only get to live in it.

Previously:

Banana Republic (July 1, 2024)

Banana Republic – Rule of law? What rule of law? (July 1, 2024)

Banana Republic – It’s a cult (July 1, 2024)

Ask me how I feel right now. I dare you. (July 1, 2024)

John Cole is a steely-eyed missile man… (July 1, 2024)

John Cole is a steely-eyed missile man…

01 Monday Jul 2024

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Balloon Juice, enough hand wringing, John Cole, presidential immunity, Supreme Court, The End

This evening:

While Trump and Roberts and Alito were lighting the Reichstag on fire…
[….]
I’ve already unleashed most of my venom about the scotus decision on twitter. I just don’t have the patience for motherfuckers right now. Shit is all hands on deck. Again, I am a straight white dude in my 50’s who was baptized christian as a childd, and I will be fine in the upcoming Christian caliphate/Fourth Reich/Magadom. And I can not control how other people vote, but if Jewish Americans, Muslim Americans, and the youths want to not support Biden to teach him a lesson, there simply isn’t much I can do. Good luck drinking fracking water, breathing chemicals, and eating poison, and if you are lucky enough to make it, you better have saved some money because they are coming for social security, medicare, and medicaid. They are coming for it all. OSHA is dead, unions are gonna get it next, gay marriage, interracial marriage- it’s all on the fucking table.

I mentioned this on twitter and was immediately accused of “punching down.” Motherfucker, I am not punching anyone. I’m trying to get you to stop punching yourself in the dick and supporting the guy who didn’t fucking use Palestinian as a slur in the debate.

I just can’t with people. Politics is a god damned team sport.
[….]

Previously:

Banana Republic (July 1, 2024)

Banana Republic – Rule of law? What rule of law? (July 1, 2024)

Banana Republic – It’s a cult (July 1, 2024)

Ask me how I feel right now. I dare you. (July 1, 2024)

Banana Republic – Rule of law? What rule of law?

01 Monday Jul 2024

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

4th Congressional District, absolute immunity, Banana Republic, Fascist pig, former newsreader, Mark Alford, missouri, presidential immunity, right wingnut, rot, rotten, social media, Supreme Court

“…Even if these nightmare scenarios never play out, and I pray they never do, the damage has been done. The relationship between the President and the people he serves has shifted irrevocably. In every use of official power, the President is now a king above the law…”

Today, from Mark Alford (r):

Congressman Mark Alford
[July 1, 2024]
Statement on Supreme Court Upholding Presidential Immunity:
A WIN FOR AMERICA
Today, the United States Supreme Court upheld a vital principle: Presidential Immunity. The Supreme Court’s decision is a resounding victory against the radical left’s relentless efforts to undermine our great institutions and impair the abilities of the future Trump Presidency.
By affirming President Trump’s immunity, the Supreme Court has defended the Office of the President against unjust political harassment and unfair targeting. This political harassment will no longer be normalized. Baseless and politically motivated lawsuits have no place in blocking the cornerstone of democracy in our great nation.
President Trump’s unwavering commitment to the rule of law was applauded through the court’s courage in standing up for what is right for America. His steadfast leadership in the face of unprecedented opposition stands strong. Today’s decision is an inspiration to generations of Americans to stand up for our values and our freedoms.
Today will go down in history as a beacon of hope to all who cherish our nation.
Today marks a landmark decision of triumph for the Constitution.
Today is a win for America.

“How are you ever going to wash the stench of Trump of yourself?”

Mark Alford (r) [2023 file photo].

Some of the responses:

Biden should immediately remove the 6 far right wing justices and declare it an official act.

Heh.

[….] why not? If Presidents can do whatever the hell they want as official acts. I actually believed the court should affirm the President isn’t immune from criminal acts but it’s evident that 6 of them are protecting Trump and are bought and paid for by billionaires. They just declared the President a king. Do you ever stop and listen how stupid Trump sounds. Do you ever think how someone who so easily cheated on everyone of his wives would cheat anyone including his supporters. Do you ever listen to the interviews of his supporters at his hate rallies? They are bat shit crazy. I feel embarrassed for all his supporters.

what? it was OK to you that trump tried to stop the lawful transfer of power? Listen to yourself.

Is stealing an election official. Is J6 official, They’re definitely making some of Trump’s action “legal” even though they were clearly an attempt to steal the election.
This whole thing is to protect Trump without giving Biden too much power.
The corruption of the Republican justices is absolute and they have to be stopped. Expand the Court. All they did was as delay his trial because an insurrection is not an official act.

no it is not.
It was a Trump influenced SCOTUS that did NOT fully address Presidential Immunity.
Yes, it did address (to a point) Immunity for “Official” acts. By doing so, it is carving out acts that are/were clearly illegal for most Americans, but are ok because they are now “Official Acts”.
SCOTUS has proven yet again, that like a number of Politicians, they too are beholden to Trump. Unfortunately, by being so beholden to Trump,
SCOTUS continues to show how they don’t care, nor have the ability to interpret and define law in a fair, just, and equal manner.

Stealing and hiding classified documents is not an official act.
Fraud is not an official act.
Congressman Mark Alford support fraudulent criminals.
End of story–still

Justice delayed is justice denied.

You didn’t read it very close Mark lmfao. And Trump has no respect for the law and that is quite obvious. You’re a joke, sir.

Today marks us one step closer to Putin. Previous presidents resigned rather than move us towards dictatorship.

They had fewer enablers, like Mark (r).

Due to the Supreme Court decision granting extra-constitutional immunity to a former President, Quality of character has never been more important for candidates.
We must elect Presidents with good character, morals and honesty. All else is optional.

How quaint.

Jefferson never wished the President or the Supreme Court vested with this much power. Think about that over Independence Day.

Things that are now legal:
Assassinating your political opponent because they’re a “clear and present threat to national security”
Allocating all tariffs to his or her personal bank account
Taking any bribes they want
Installing all the loyalists and sycophants they need in the military, DOJ, and every other agency and fire any federal employee.
Implementing Project 2025
We will have a KING not a President

Mark Alford (r) considers that a feature, not a bug.

This ruling has granted the complete discretion of what an official act is to the POTUS. The Supreme Court even cites the appointment of a special counsel as something the DOJ doesn’t have the authority to do.
Rather implying that instead a sitting POTUS and fully weaponized their Departments to what the deem within the duties of their office.
The implications of this are far more dangerous than your pea brain can comprehend. As Justice Thomas points out this is now a case-by-case basis.
Right now the Biden Administration has complete authority to hold you and all your colleagues accountable for anything he deems a threat. Including withholding funding to Ukraine and refusing to create a border bill.

You’re just as corrupt as the former President and those conservative judges. The only thing “radical” is viewpoints like yours and the majority of conservatives these days. This Supreme Court will go down in history as the MOST corrupt court.

Previously:

Banana Republic (July 1, 2024)

It turns out that Samuel Alito (r) is pro-choice…when it comes to flags

29 Wednesday May 2024

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Fascist pig, judicial ethics, recusal, right wingnut, Samuel Alito, Supreme Court

[….]A Justice [pdf] should not allow family, social, political, financial, or other relationships to influence official conduct or judgment. A Justice should neither knowingly lend the prestige of the judicial office to advance the private interests of the Justice or others nor knowingly convey or permit others to convey the impression that they are in a special position to influence the Justice. [….]

[2022 file photo]

[2020 file photo]

Apparently.

Alito rejects calls to recuse himself from Supreme Court cases because of flag controversies

[….]

….’As soon as I saw it, I asked my wife to take it down, but for several days, she refused,’ he wrote in nearly identical letters to Democrats in the House and the Senate.

He had previously explained to the newspaper that his wife put up the flag as part of a nasty neighborhood dispute.

The flag at his beach house was also hoisted by his wife, Alito wrote, noting that the house is in her name and was bought with money she inherited from her parents.

‘My wife is fond of flying flags. I am not,’ he wrote….

[….]

We’re fond of judicial ethics and The Constitution, he is not.

[2020 file photo]

[2021 file photo]

The family from Virginia in your business

26 Tuesday Mar 2024

Posted by Michael Bersin in Josh Hawley, US Senate

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

anti-choice, Erin Hawley, Fascist pigs, insurrectionist, Josh Hawley, right wingnut, Supreme Court, Virginia, women's health care, women's reproductive health

Today, at the U.S. Supreme Court:

Anti-mifepristone argument too dumb for even Trump nominees to stomach

Where the law is determinate, judges will ignore it only when they have very strong policy preferences and the arrogance to believe they trump everything. In the mifepristone case, it looks like only Alito and perhaps Thomas will fall into this category…

[….]

…If your argument that an approved drug is so dangerous that the judiciary should usurp the FDA and revoke the approval cannot find a single person adversely affected by the drug to bring the suit, I believe the term for this is “self-refutation…”

[….]

A Washington power couple, just like Liddy and Bob Dole (r), but with Fascism!

Crooked Clarence

11 Tuesday Apr 2023

Posted by penroseonpolitics in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Clarence Thomas, Ginni Thomas, Harlan Crow, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Ethics

They’ll be back

02 Tuesday Aug 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in social media

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

abortion, Kansas, Roe v Wade, social media, Supreme Court, Twitter

Abortion will remain legal in Kansas.

Claire McCaskill @clairecmc
Thing I never thought I would say….thank God for Kansas.
9:11 PM · Aug 2, 2022

“…A vote for [yes] the Value Them Both Amendment would affirm there is no Kansas constitutional right to abortion…”

Via the Kansas Secretary of State:

Constitutional Amendment

Precincts Reporting: 3025 of 3994

Votes %

Constitutional Amendment – “YES” 300,815 39%

Constitutional Amendment – “NO” 463,414 61%

Total Votes 764,229

[emphasis added]

They’ll be back. You can count on it.

Previously:

In Kansas (July 26, 2022)

← Older posts

Recent Posts

  • In our town
  • He be a sycophant by his trade
  • By the sound of their whistles…
  • Campaign Finance: What’s in a name?
  • Rev. Jesse Jackson (1941-2026)

Recent Comments

By the sound of thei… on ICE Whistles
kaboyates on Foul.
Neunundneunzig Luftb… on El Paso, Texas – NOTAM…
Never attribute to m… on El Paso, Texas – NOTAM…
Eric Burlison (r): n… on When extraterrestrials pass by…

Archives

  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,030,961 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

 

Loading Comments...