• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Tag Archives: Bob Onder

Strange Priority

22 Friday Aug 2025

Posted by Michael Bersin in Congress, social media

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

3rd Congressional District, Bob Onder, missouri, right wingnut, sycophant, Trump sycophant

Bob Onder (r) [2025 file photo].

Congressman Bob Onder
[August 22, 2025]
COMING SOON: The TRUMP Center for Performing Arts?! 🎥
[….]

Some of the responses:

I wonder if Bobby ever sees our comments? Imma guess not.

Town hall?

Quit lickin the boots of this dude!

Bad combover. Check. Too long red tie. Check. Orange spray tan. Check. Tiny hands. Check. Cluelessness. Check…

I love this for you- You will be remebered for being loyal to this POS

Congrats. Idiot. This doesn’t count as an accomplishment. Have you met with constituents in the form of a town hall, yet?

You’re such a pathetic kiss ass, Bob.

Those stupid hats!

Grift.

Campaign Finance: business must be good

25 Wednesday Oct 2023

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Bob Onder, campaign finance, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission

Yesterday at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C131072 10/24/2023 Onder For Missouri Robert Onder 4015 S. Highway 94 Augusta MO 63332 Self Physician 10/24/2023 $500,000.00

[emphasis added]

Onder For Missouri – Active
MECID: C131072
2090 Key Harbour Drive
Lake St Louis, MO 63367
[….]
Committee Type: Candidate
[….]
Election History
Election Outcome Political Office
8/2/2022 Primary Election County Executive St. Charles County

Must be nice.

Math is hard, proportional representation is evil, Missouri voters are stupid

04 Friday Feb 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in social media

≈ 7 Comments

Tags

Bill Eigel, Bob Onder, congressional reapportionment, gerrymandering, Jay Ashcroft, Mike Moon, missouri, social media, Twitter, U.S. House of Representatives

Republican Dogma.

A right wingnut rally, in celebration:

[graphic edited for space]

Missouri Senate Conservative Caucus @SenateCaucus
Join the 7R-1D congressional map rally at the Missouri Capitol on Monday, February 7 starting at 10 a.m.! Let’s make sure Pelosi isn’t Speaker of the House in 2023! #moleg
[….]
9:19 PM · Feb 3, 2022

10:00 a.m. on a Monday? Anyone think they’ll book an extra bus or two for actual working people?

2020 election math:

Election Results
Unofficial Election Returns
State of Missouri – 11/03/2020 2020 General Election, Tuesday, November 03, 2020

President & Vice President (3692 of 3692 Precincts Reported)
Donald J. Trump, Michael R. Pence Republican 1,718,736 56.8%
Joseph R. Biden, Kamala D. Harris Democratic 1,253,014 41.4%

Governor (3692 of 3692 Precincts Reported)
Mike Parson Republican 1,720,202 57.1%
Nicole Galloway Democratic 1,225,771 40.7%

The 2020 Congressional vote:

Election Results
Unofficial Election Returns
State of Missouri – 11/03/2020 2020 General Election, Tuesday, November 03, 2020

U.S. Representative – District 1 (729 of 729 Precincts Reported)
Anthony Rogers Republican 59,940 19.0%
Cori Bush Democratic 249,087 78.8%

U.S. Representative – District 2 (798 of 798 Precincts Reported)
Ann Wagner Republican 233,157 51.9%
Jill Schupp Democratic 204,540 45.5%

U.S. Representative – District 3 (327 of 327 Precincts Reported)
Blaine Luetkemeyer Republican 282,866 69.4%
Megan Rezabek Democratic 116,095 28.5%

U.S. Representative – District 4 (384 of 384 Precincts Reported)
Vicky Hartzler Republican 245,247 67.6%
Lindsey Simmons Democratic 107,635 29.7%

U.S. Representative – District 5 (257 of 257 Precincts Reported)
Ryan Derks Republican 135,934 38.6%
Emanuel Cleaver II Democratic 207,180 58.8%

U.S. Representative – District 6 (475 of 475 Precincts Reported)
Sam Graves Republican 258,709 67.1%
Gena L. Ross Democratic 118,926 30.8%

U.S. Representative – District 7 (303 of 303 Precincts Reported)
Billy Long Republican 254,318 68.9%
Teresa Montseny Democratic 98,111 26.6%

U.S. Representative – District 8 (449 of 449 Precincts Reported)
Jason Smith Republican 253,811 76.9%
Kathy Ellis Democratic 70,561 21.4%

The total Congressional vote for either Democrats or Republicans in Missouri in 2020 was 2,896,117. The total Congressional vote for Republican candidates in 2020 was 1,723,982 (59.53%). The total Congressional vote for Democratic candidates was 1,172,135 (40.47%).

7 (87.5%) “Republican” districts – 1 (12.5%) “Democratic” districts in Congress from Missouri? Seriously? More like 5 (62.5%) – 3 (37.5%).

Math is hard.

Jay Ashcroft (r) [2019 file photo].

Mike Moon (2019 file photo).

Campaign Finance: you get what you pay for

25 Monday Oct 2021

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance, Missouri General Assembly, Missouri Senate

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Bob Onder, campaign finance, Corona virus, COVID-19, Missouri Ethics Commission, Missouri Senate, pandemic, right wingnut, social media, Twitter

Today at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C131072 10/25/2021 Onder For Missouri Doug Mueller 11 Big Country Circle OFallon MO 63368 Mueller Prost Accountant 10/23/2021 $5,001.00

C131072 10/25/2021 Onder For Missouri John OBrien 420 Charlemagne Lake Saint Louis MO 63367 Retired 10/23/2021 $10,000.00

C131072 10/25/2021 Onder For Missouri Matthew Conoyer 74 Castle Bluff St Charles MO 63304 Midwest ENT Physician 10/23/2021 $5,001.00

[emphasis added

For what?:

Dr. Bob Onder @BobOnderMO
This Indian slum contained COVID-19 with hydroxychloroquine plus vitamin D& zinc. Very encouraging. Comes on heels of ⁦@HenryFordNews ⁩ study on HCQ plus Zpack. #moleg
[….]
6:29 AM · Jul 23, 2020

From the National Institutes of Health (NIH):

November 24, 2020
Hydroxychloroquine doesn’t benefit hospitalized COVID-19 patients

[….] Larger, well-designed studies were needed to determine if hydroxychloroquine was a safe and effective treatment for SARS-CoV-2 infection. In April, NIH launched a clinical trial at 34 hospitals nationwide to test the medication. The study was funded by NIH’s National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).

By June, the study was stopped because interim results showed the drug neither caused harm nor improved patient outcomes. The trial had enrolled 479 of the expected 510 patients. Earlier in the month, the FDA had revoked its emergency use authorization for hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine. It cited a lack of benefit as well as risks, such as serious heart rhythm problems. [….]

The scientists also found no differences in any of 12 additional outcomes, which included mortality 28 days after assignment to a treatment group or time to recovery. Based on the data, they concluded that hydroxychloroquine was not an effective treatment. [….]

Studies in the United Kingdom and Brazil had similar results. [….]

Dr. Bob Onder @BobOnderMO
In fact, they averaged 2.6 “comorbitities.” Although every death is a tragedy, many, many people died WITH #COVID19 , not OF #COVID19. The survival rate overall is 99.8% (CDC data) heavily weighted toward older, sicker individuals.
[….]
2:08 PM · Aug 30, 2020

From the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), in the United States to date:

TOTAL CASES 45,316,210
+77,933 New Cases
CASES IN LAST 7 DAYS 491,071
TOTAL DEATHS 733,834
+1,834 New Deaths
CDC | Data as of: October 24, 2021 5:23 PM ET. Posted: October 24, 2021 5:53 PM ET

From the World Health Organization (WHO):

Estimating mortality from COVID-19
Scientific Brief
4 August 2020

[….]
Case fatality ratio (CFR) is the proportion of individuals diagnosed with a disease who die from that disease and is therefore a measure of severity among detected cases:

Reliable CFRs that can be used to assess the deadliness of an outbreak and evaluate any implemented public health measures are generally obtained at the end of an outbreak, after all cases have been resolved (affected individuals either died or recovered).
[….]
Calculating CFR during an ongoing epidemic
CFR calculated using the above formula during ongoing epidemics provides a conditional, estimate of CFR and is influenced by lags in report dates for cases and deaths [13]. This leads to a wide variation in CFR estimates over the course of an epidemic, which tends toward a stable, final estimate of CFR as active cases are resolved.

One simple solution to mitigating the bias due to delays to case resolution during an ongoing outbreak is to restrict the analysis to resolved cases [….]

In the United States – to date:

Case Fatality Ratio (CFR) [%] = (733,834 [total deaths]/45,316,210 [total cases} x 100

CFR = 1.62%

Dr. Bob Onder @BobOnderMO
In #HB271 we also banned #COVIDPassports! No Missourian should be subject to restrictions on their movement or personal liberties for declining to participate in an intrusive COVID passport scheme. #moleg ⁦@Koenig4MO @jmmurphy8⁦ @BenBrownTweets #Freedom
[….]
8:13 PM · May 12, 2021

Sure, that sounds like a really good idea in a pandemic – just stick our heads in the sand and hope it all goes away.

Roy Blunt cranks up the election year looney tunes

08 Friday Apr 2016

Posted by willykay in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Bob Onder, Election 2016, Jason Kander, Merrick Garlaned, Roy Blunt, Sanctuary cities, undocumented immigrants

Remember that when asked if he would meet with President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee, Merrick Garland, GOP Senator Roy Blunt replied that he was too busy to do so? I can imagine that particular excuse didn’t go over too well with many Missourians since very few of us have the luxury of refusing to do our jobs because we’re “too busy” doing something else like attending fundraisers. I bet he’s heard plenty from constituents about that particular gaffe. Now, however, Blunt thinks he can turn the tables and make the “too busy” meme work for his reelection effort.

State Jason Kander is running for Blunt’s senate seat. Recently, Blunt has found a way to pander to rampant anti-immigration sentiment by attacking “sanctuary cities,” that is, cities that shelter and protect undocumented immigrants. For some reason he thinks that he can score points by calling on Kander to take a position on urban sanctuaries although there are no sanctuary cities in Missouri. Kander’s spokesperson, quite reasonably, responded that Kander “is focused on his job and hasn’t had an opportunity to review the legislation being debated in Washington.”

A Blunt proxy, the red-meat regurgitating state Sen. Bob Onder, stepped forward to do Blunt’s dirty work and immediately set up a Web page soliciting those frightened souls who are worried about sanctuary cities to put the heat on Kander:

Jason Kander’s campaign recently claimed he was too busy to take a position on the efforts to defund Sanctuary Cities, which protect thousands of violent illegal immigrants from deportation. There are too many American lives at risk to allow Jason Kander to hide from this issue. Tell Jason Kander to take a position on Sanctuary Cities today.  Sign the petition

Of course the “too busy” situations are not exactly equivalent. Reviewing proposed federal anti-immigrant legislation isn’t actually Kander’s job while vetting Supreme Court nominees is one of the most important parts of Senator Blunt’s job.

Nor is Kander evading the issue of immigration. He has indicated that he supports some parts of the President’s executive order although he objects to the use of an executive order to counter GOP inaction on the immigration issue. It’s highly likely that he has not, as his spokesperson indicated, reviewed the legislation that Blunt wants him to comment on – nor is it his job to do so – yet, at least. I’m not worried that he’s incapable of coming to an informed position and acting on it when he takes Blunt’s place in the Senate.

Nor, yet again, can one be blamed for wondering just what, besides fundraisers, has been keeping Senator Blunt so busy that he can’t do his constitutionally mandated job? One telling example: Blunt recently voiced his intention to fight new fiduciary rules that reqire investment advisors to put the interests of their clients before their own desire for lucrative commissions.

On the subject of raising funds, Could Blunt’s position on this issue have anything to do with the fact that during the period 2011-2016, he received a little over $970,000 dollars from PACs representing financial industries – and well over a million more dollars if contributions from individuals working in these industries were to be added in to the total. Seems pretty clear whose business keeps Senator Blunt’s calendar so full that he can’t do the part of his job that involves serving “the people.” It seems like it’s all just one big fundraiser for Blunt.

And what about Onder’s fear-mongering in Blunt’s name about “thousands of violent illegal immigrants” and “American lives at risk”? A recent article in USAtoday examined the various efforts to determine the risk of violence from undocumented immigrants and concluded that, “using the data we have, it seems impossible to responsibly claim that those immigrants are more likely to commit crimes than their American-born neighbors.” Evidence to the contrary almost always seems to be anecdotal

Blunt has learned Donald Trump’s lesson well. Immigration scares poorly informed white Americans who are more than willing to generalize from isolated incidents of immigrant criminal behavior. What this means, of course, is now that the election game is finally on, and Kander is proving to be more formidable than anyone thought he would be when he first declared, we should be prepared for more of the same type of inept looney tunes from the Blunt camp.

Onder didn’t really mean what he said about Illinois

04 Monday Apr 2016

Posted by willykay in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Bob Onder, SJR 39

Last Friday’s St. Louis Post-Dispatch printed a correction explaining what Sen. Bob Onder (R-2) really meant when he seemed to blame  Illinois’ budgetary problems on LGBT friendly laws in that state. Of course, such an argument does not stand up to scrutiny – I wrote about some of the problems it raises in a post last Thursday, “What’s Bob Onder Got Against Illinois.”

Here’s the direct quote from the original Post-Dispatch article:

“We look at states that have a lot of aggressive gay rights laws — Illinois comes to mind, Chicago — and they are some of our economic basket cases,” Onder said. “I really think that these businesses should leave well enough alone and let Missouri voters decide whether to protect religious freedom.

What do you think Onder is trying to suggest?

Somebody – Onder perhaps – believed that clarification of this statement was necessary so this correction appeared in the Post-Dispatch (Friday, April 1, p. 2):

Missouri Sen. Bob Onder, R-Lake Saint Louis, said that he believes a proposed constitutional amendment giving businesses the right to refuse to serve same-sex couples would be good for business, and he asserted that Illinois is a state with aggressive gay-rights laws as well as economic problems. A headline and article in the A section Thursday incorrectly reported that Onder had suggested that Illinois’ gay-rights laws were hurting the state’s economy.

What does this noise have to do with the price of cigars?

Why would Onder think it’s a big deal that there are states whose economic problems have nothing to do with their inclusive approach to LGBT issues?

Do you think he’d also like to remark on the fact that YouTube videos have nothing to do with Illinois economic woes?

The real point, the one that the Chamber of Commerce is trying to make and that Onder doesn’t get, is that the world has changed. LGBT folks are not going to take exclusion meekly, and business leaders have learned that discrimination isn’t good for the bottom line. Some corporate types are even opposed to bigotry for moral reasons. These businesses are now aware of the problems posed by freedom-to-discriminate laws, and many are more than willing to use their economic clout to make themselves heard, as they have done in Indiana, Georgia and in North Carolina – and in Missouri, one expects, if SJR39, Onder’s freedom-to-discriminate bill, becomes state law. Then we’ll all pay the price for his economic vagaries.

What’s Bob Onder got against Illinois?

31 Thursday Mar 2016

Posted by willykay in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Bob Onder, dicrimintion, Heather Steans, Illinois, Kansas, Missouri Legislature, SJR 39, Tax policy

State Senator Bob Onder (R-2) is really, really worried that Missouri will go the way of Illinois, which is not experiencing good fiscal times.  Onder, under the guise of “religious freedom,”  is proposing a Constitutional amendment that would permit folks  who don’t like LGBT folks to discriminate against them in the business sphere. Faced with the rather clear evidence provided by Indiana and Georgia, states that have backed away from faux religious freedom-to-discriminate legislation in the face of potential economic blowback, as well as the brewing economic disaster in North Carolina which just passed one of these ugly  laws, Onder seems to be more than a little desperate to defend his earlier statement that no one has proved to him that such a bill could hurt the Missouri economy. How to do that? Find a state that has an anti-discrimination culture that is reflected in legislation that protects LGBT individuals and that, like Illinois, is also having a rough time economically.

Onder may be overusing the example  of Illinois’ financial status though. It seems to be his all-purpose scapegoat. Earlier he blamed Illinois’ financial problems on the fact that it extended Medicaid according to the provisions of Obamacare.  One cannot be faulted for wondering just what it is it that is driving Illinois so close to the edge? Addressing bigotry  or providing healthcare for the working poor?

Of course, it’s always possible that Illinois’ problems have an entirely different source. Indeed, Illinois Democratic State Senator Heather Steans noted in response to Onder’s claims that, “if Illinois’ tax rates were as high as Missouri’s, we wouldn’t be struggling with the budget problems we have today.”

There’s lots of evidence to support Steans’ statement. After Republican Governor Bruce Rauner came into office in Illinois he rolled back  the temporary tax increases implemented by former Governor Quinn – although financial experts agreed that, no matter how severely the budget was cut, if Illinois was to emerge from its financial crisis, the higher tax rates should be extended.   As a consequence of this action, combined with the open war between he hide-bound Republican Rauner and the Democratic legislature, the picture for Illinois is truly bleak.

If you want more evidence for Steans’ contention, I have one word for you: Kansas. Kansas enacted great big ol’ tax cuts for business and the wealthy and the place is a disaster area, huge deficits, degraded public services and, get this, it’s losing jobs. And none of the blame can be attributed to LGBT friendly laws or Medicaid extension. Of course, as a Missouri Republican who has touted tax cuts as the yellow brick road leading to  unimaginable trickle-down rivers of wealth, I don’t imagine Onder will be any more interested in exploring the Kansas example than he is in acknowledging the impact of the anti-LGBT legislation in Indiana, Georgia or North Carolina.

Better yet, look at the roster of prospering cities with a strong anti-discrimination culture. As one commentator notes, it “is no coincidence. San Francisco and Austin are arguably the most gay-friendly cities in the country, and they check in at #1 and #2 respectively on the Milken Institute’s 2014 List of Best-Performing Cities.” Of course, as Steans response to Onder implies, there are probably lots of other factors that affect prosperity – certainly the oil industry might be key to the relative prosperity in Texas and Oklahoma,  rather than the bigoted LGBT policies that Onder cites.

But one thing is sure. Lots of businesses don’t want to be associated with states that enshrine discrimination in their laws. The evidence is undeniable that there is a growing economic backlash against freedom-to-discriminate bills, no matter how pandering politicians attempt to disguise them under the high-minded rubric of ensuring “freedom of religion.” We all know nobody’s religious freedom is under threat.  I know that the GOP has come to stand for retrograde ideological purity over any practical consideration, including fiscal responsibility,  but is Onder really ready to take the blame for what his follow-the-ugly-leader legislation could cost the state?

Oh, and Obamacare is evil, too

02 Tuesday Dec 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Bob Onder, General Assembly, Medicaid, missouri, Obamacare, SB 51

So there. A bill, prefiled yesterday for the 2015 session in the Senate by newly elected right wingnut Bob Onder (r):

SB 51 Relating to prohibiting governments from compelling individuals to purchase health insurance and participate in health care systems

Sponsor: Onder

LR Number: 0574S.01I Fiscal Note not available

Committee:

Last Action: 12/1/2014 – Prefiled

[….]

Current Bill Summary

SB 51 – This act modifies what is commonly known as the Health Care Freedom Act which was approved by the Missouri voters in 2010. The act restates Missouri’s public policy of allowing its citizens the freedom to choose or decline to choose any mode of securing health care services without facing a penalty and provides that it is against Missouri public policy to implement or operate a health insurance exchange in Missouri. The act also posits several findings of fact of how the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and implementing a state-based exchange would subject Missouri citizens and employers to penalties. The act further provides that if a health insurance issuer operating in Missouri accepts any remuneration that may result in the imposition of penalties contrary to Missouri’s public policy, then the Director of Insurance shall suspend the issuer’s license to transact business in Missouri. The suspension will stay in place until the issuer represents that it has returned the remuneration to its source and will decline any such future remuneration. The act further imposes a duty upon the Attorney General to seek injunctive relief and other appropriate remedies whenever the public policy set forth in the act is being violated.

This act is identical to SB 546 (2014) and SB 473 (2013).

[….]

You were expecting anything different?

Previously:

You were expecting anything different? (December 1, 2014)

It’ll be a cold day in the General Assembly… (December 1, 2014)

Now we’re just waiting on the Agenda 21, Sharia law and nullification bills (December 1, 2014)

Why didn’t we think of that?

04 Monday Aug 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Bob Onder, crossover, election, missouri, Primary, Twitter

Come to think of it, this could be fun.

Bob Onder (r), a candidate spending Rex Sinquefield’s money in the republican primary for the 2nd Senate District, doesn’t appear to be a fan of crossover voting in a primary:

Bob Onder ‏@BobOnderMO

Union boss urges Dems to take GOP ballot in SD2 primary! We don’t need Democrats stealing elections in St C Co! [….] 7:36 PM – 2 Aug 2014

Without fail every election cycle one can count on hearing at least one amateur “expert” on politics bloviating about the way things ought to be in campaigns. They usually preface their wisdom with the phrase “I’ve been a registered [party name] here in Missouri my entire life…” It is one of the small joys of politics in this state to quietly and quickly reply, “Voters don’t register by party in Missouri.”

Uh, you can select any party ballot in a primary (but only one party) and vote it.

A few replies:

Sean Nicholson ‏@ssnich

I think @BobOnderMO may be confusing “normal electoral activity” with “stealing.” Get a grip. http://bit.ly/1kivrmq  #moleg 1:53 PM – 4 Aug 2014

Alexandra ‏@aliemalie

@ssnich I voted in GOP primaries before voting in GOP primaries was cool. #mosen2012 2:07 PM – 4 Aug 2014

Michael Bersin ‏@MBersin

@ssnich @BobOnderMO Uh, the General Assembly could change parts of RSMo 115 to register voters by party and close primaries. But they won’t. 4:07 PM – 4 Aug 2014

Or alternatively, a candidate could sincerely believe that there’s only one check vote that truly counts.

Previously:

Campaign Finance: a league of one’s own (March 16, 2014)

Campaign Finance: “…Outstanding. Now all we need is a deck of cards…” (April 28, 2014)

Campaign Finance: Well, there are two… (July 2, 2014)

Understatement (July 20, 2014)

Campaign Finance: same difference (July 22, 2014)

Campaign Finance: a league of one’s own

16 Sunday Mar 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

2nd Senate District, Bob Onder, campaign finance, Chuck Gatschenberger, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission:, Vicki Schneider

Today, at the Missouri Ethics Commission, for one of three republican candidates in the 2nd Senate District:

C131072 03/16/2014 ONDER FOR MISSOURI Robert Onder 2090 Key Harbour Dr Lake Saint Louis MO 63367 self Physician 3/16/2014 $200,000.00

[emphasis added]

That’s commitment.

The filed candidates (to date):

State Senator – District 2

Republican Name Mailing Address Random Number Date Filed

Bob Onder 2090 KEY HARBOUR DR LAKE ST LOUIS MO 63367 80 2/25/2014 12:09 p.m.

Vicki Schneider 429 N MAIN ST O FALLON MO 63366 116 2/25/2014 2:06 p.m.

Chuck Gatschenberger 2491 FOXBRIDGE CT LAKE ST LOUIS MO 63367 477 2/25/2014 1:38 p.m.

The money race – January campaign finance reports:

C081111: Gatschenberger 4 Mo

2491 Foxbridge Court Committee Type: Candidate

Lake St Louis Mo 63367 Party Affiliation: Republican

[….] Established Date: 03/21/2008

  Termination Date:

Information Reported On: 2014 – January Quarterly Report

Beginning Money on Hand $47,360.84

Monetary Receipts + $40,575.00

Monetary Expenditures – $16,032.87

Contributions Made – $100.00

Other Disbursements – $4,355.02

Subtotal     $20,087.11

Ending Money On Hand   $67,447.95

[emphasis added]

C091042: Committee To Elect Vicki A Schneider For State Senate

429 North Main Committee Type: Candidate

O’fallon Mo 63366 Party Affiliation: Republican

[….] Established Date: 01/30/2009

  Termination Date:

Information Reported On: 2014 – January Quarterly Report

Beginning Money on Hand $18,636.25

Monetary Receipts + $33,095.00

Monetary Expenditures – $3,803.41

Contributions Made – $0.00

Other Disbursements – $0.00

Subtotal     $29,291.59

Ending Money On Hand   $47,927.84

[emphasis added]

C131072: Onder For Missouri

2090 Key Harbour Drive Committee Type: Candidate

Lake St Louis Mo 63367 Party Affiliation: Republican

[….] Established Date: 05/13/2013

  Termination Date:

Information Reported On: 2014 – January Quarterly Report

Beginning Money on Hand $80,803.00

Monetary Receipts + $19,260.00

Monetary Expenditures – $28.63

Contributions Made – $0.00

Other Disbursements – $0.00

Subtotal     $19,231.37

Ending Money On Hand   $100,034.37

[emphasis added]

That’s in a whole ‘nother league.

Previously:

Campaign Finance: the term limits scramble (June 3, 2013)

← Older posts

Recent Posts

  • B-2 or not B-2?
  • WAR? What WAR?
  • War van Winkle
  • Quick, look over there!
  • The mail pieces have already been created

Recent Comments

The mail pieces have… on Are you certain it wasn’…
In our town | Show M… on ICE Whistles
By the sound of thei… on ICE Whistles
kaboyates on Foul.
Neunundneunzig Luftb… on El Paso, Texas – NOTAM…

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,032,027 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

 

Loading Comments...