So there. A bill, prefiled yesterday for the 2015 session in the Senate by newly elected right wingnut Bob Onder (r):
SB 51 Relating to prohibiting governments from compelling individuals to purchase health insurance and participate in health care systems
LR Number: 0574S.01I Fiscal Note not available
Last Action: 12/1/2014 – Prefiled
Current Bill Summary
SB 51 – This act modifies what is commonly known as the Health Care Freedom Act which was approved by the Missouri voters in 2010. The act restates Missouri’s public policy of allowing its citizens the freedom to choose or decline to choose any mode of securing health care services without facing a penalty and provides that it is against Missouri public policy to implement or operate a health insurance exchange in Missouri. The act also posits several findings of fact of how the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and implementing a state-based exchange would subject Missouri citizens and employers to penalties. The act further provides that if a health insurance issuer operating in Missouri accepts any remuneration that may result in the imposition of penalties contrary to Missouri’s public policy, then the Director of Insurance shall suspend the issuer’s license to transact business in Missouri. The suspension will stay in place until the issuer represents that it has returned the remuneration to its source and will decline any such future remuneration. The act further imposes a duty upon the Attorney General to seek injunctive relief and other appropriate remedies whenever the public policy set forth in the act is being violated.
This act is identical to SB 546 (2014) and SB 473 (2013).
You were expecting anything different?
You were expecting anything different? (December 1, 2014)
It’ll be a cold day in the General Assembly… (December 1, 2014)
Now we’re just waiting on the Agenda 21, Sharia law and nullification bills (December 1, 2014)
Bob Yates said:
If a person declines to get health care insurance, does that mean a hospital can decline to treat the person unless the person posts a bond that will cover the treatment.
After all, we don’t want people with insurance to pay for people who don’t have insurance, do we?
Michael Bersin said:
I see what you did there.