• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Tag Archives: jack danforth

Campaign Finance: Missouri begs to differ? – part 2

23 Thursday Feb 2023

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

campaign finance, jack danforth, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, PAC

Today at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

222341 02/23/2023 Missouri Agrees Jack Danforth 911 Tirrill Farms Road St Louis MO 63124 Dowd Bennett Attorney 2/23/2022 $10,291.00

C222341 02/23/2023 Missouri Agrees Cathi Brain 815 West 51st St Kansas City MO 64112 Not employed 2/23/2022 $9,000.00

$10,291.00? What’s with that?

From a conversation on social media:

Well, yeah, but they [the PAC] ain’t exactly “grassroots” at this point. They filed a “limited activity” report in January and then a single $10,000 contribution shows up. They claim to have raised $200,000 so far.

So their web site still doesn’t tell us much that’s useful – and they appear to have communications staff.

RSMo § 115.199 requires that the local election authority remove deceased registered voters from their rolls. If they’re not doing it locally, get a writ of mandamus.

I’m not convinced by their stated “solutions”/ask list to their perceived problems.

Uh, voters decide if candidates are “similar” or not. This PAC appears to be constituted to oppose ranked choice voting. All the other stuff is chaff.

School board elections as a model? Heh. The voter turnout for school board elections is an exemplar for grassroots democracy, right?

“In the first place God made idiots. This was for practice. Then He made School Boards.” – Mark Twain (1897)

Previously:

Campaign Finance: Missouri begs to differ? (February 21, 2023)

You built this, Jack

20 Sunday Feb 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in US Senate

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

gaslighting, jack danforth, missouri, right wingnut, sanctimonious, self righteous, U.S. Senate

Desperate for some sort of relevance, eh? You can smell it.

On Friday:

Jack Danforth wants to find an independent candidate to run for U.S. Senate in Missouri
A candidate who shuns partisanship would have ‘a lot of resources’ for campaign, former Senator says
BY: RUDI KELLER – FEBRUARY 18, 2022 6:58 PM

[…]

“So much depends on touching the better angels of our nature and that is what the campaign would be about,” Danforth said.

Better angels?

Clarence Thomas (r). Josh Hawley (r). Actions, not words. We remember what Jack Danforth (r) did.

There is no such thing as a “moderate” republican.

We rest our case.

A party in disarray

10 Thursday Dec 2020

Posted by Michael Bersin in social media

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

amicus brief, Attorney General, Donald Trump, election, Eric Schmitt, jack danforth, jiggery-pokery, Joe Biden, Josh Hawley, missouri, social media, Twitter, U.S. Supreme Court

republicans.

Pass the popcorn.

Last night:

Mark Pedroli, Esq @MarkPedroli
Police cars revolving lightFormer Missouri Senator John Danforth filed a brief describing current Attorney General @Eric_Schmitt’s case to overturn the election as “jiggery-pokery,” which means deceitful or dishonest.

Danforth’s brief [….]
9:30 PM · Dec 9, 2020

Jack Danforth (r) and his republican friends think the Texas suit against the election results in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin is a really bad idea. From the Amicus brief:

…the Constitution does not make this Court the multidistrict litigation panel for trials of presidential election disputes…

…Plaintiff’s Motions make a mockery of federalism and separation of powers. It would violate the most fundamental constitutional principles for this Court to serve as the trial court for presidential election disputes…

…Plaintiff raises the unprecedented assertion, contrary to 230 years of history, that a presidential election dispute is, under 28 U.S.C. §1251(a), a “controvers[y] between two or more States.” Brief in Support of Mot. For Leave to File Bill of Complaint, at 7-8. This jiggery-pokery is contradicted by the Electors Clause and 3 U.S.C. § 5…

Associate U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia [2008 file photo].

Meanwhile, Missouri’s self-proclaimed “constitutional lawyer (r)” disagrees:

Josh Hawley @HawleyMO
Good work @Eric_Schmitt!
[….]
9:24 AM · Dec 9, 2020

Josh Hawley (r) [2016 file photo].

The responses, as usual, are hilarious:

One former AG who can’t comprehend constitutional law patting another AG who can’t comprehend constitutional law on the back. Party first, right Josh? Missouri continues to be embarrassed.

Ladder buddies!

And there goes all that good will out the window w one stupid tweet undermining democracy by supporting these frivolous lawsuits. If the Dems were doing this Josh would be up in arms!

In summary, Republicans want to make it as hard and time consuming as possible to vote. If you do vote and they don’t like the result, they want to throw your vote out. And they are against judicial activism and federal control except when it benefits their political interests.

Why not go over all the states with a fine toothed comb? Perhaps some of the states that Trump won weren’t won with integrity. Let’s start with KY and then FL. Let’s go over some of these Senate elections. I’m all for it.

This would be a farce if it weren’t so damaging to our country. I’m disgusted but not surprised by you being on board. This is against everything our country is supposed to stand for

No, it’s not good work. He’s wasting Missouri tax dollars on a frivolous and symbolic effort. Everyone knows this is about the GOP not liking the outcome and has nothing to do with voter fraud. You’d be apoplectic if, for example, California sued over Missouri’s votes.

Is this the only way Republicans can stay in power? Making it harder for people to vote? How treasonous.

There is no quiet part. Trump is openly and proudly fighting to OVERTURN the will of the voters and democracy itself.

And the vast majority, aka GOP dinosaurs, of his party stand by him. Also include @RepHartzler @RoyBlunt, but you already knew this.

Roy Blunt (r) [2016 file photo].

Who the fuck is Roy blunt? Has he ever been to Missouri?

He’s wasting our taxpayers’ $$$!!!! That’s not good work, Senator.

You’re so thirsty, bro.

“The most dangerous place to stand in Washington D.C. is any place between Senator Josh Hawley and a live microphone” – Charles P. Pierce

Remember when Schmitt sued China? @HawleyMO was right behind him on that one too.

BREAKING: states’ rights champion Senator HeeHaw now says “f-ck states’ rights!”

Your footnote in history books will be short and ridiculous.

Narrator, in the future: “Who?”

What footnotes? No one will know his name in Missouri..

His next door neighbors in Virginia will.

This is pandering at best.

Here’s hoping for another one sentence rejection by SCOTUS

What a waste of taxpayer money.

One grifter congratulates another.

Spoken like a true Fascist.

The only credible evidence of fraud in the election is the vote of the junior Missouri senator who actually lives in Virginia and hasn’t actually maintained a residence in Missouri.

We see what you did there.

all theater. nothing will change. the republic is over.

Senator, you’re embarrassing yourself, hurting Missouri and our country with this, uh, manure.

No, rejecting the results of an election based on being a sore loser and calling for unconstitutional interference between states is the exact opposite of “Good work”.

You really do hate your country, don’t you?

Why don’t you believe in democracy? You’re not a conservative with this behavior, you’re an authoritarian wanting one party rule voters be damned.

Mr. Harvard Law Man, have you not learned anything?

Well, one of those fancy ones.

Why? Why is supporting this ridiculous sham a “good job”? Idiots.

Aren’t Kenny boys lawsuits getting dismissed all over the country? Where exactly is there good work here Joshua?

Also, what address did you use to vote again?

No reputable lawyer would characterize this patently frivolous litigation as “good work.” What’s wrong with you?

Yes, good work at wasting Missouri taxpayer funds. Just like the fake lawsuit against China. How is that complete bullshit working for everyone Eric?

Just shut up and start your 2024 Presidential campaign already.

That’s what this is all about. Not like you actually care about any of this junk anyway, you just treat it as a stepping stone to the White House.

Hope your ambitions goes down in flames like it did for Greitens.

You’re an embarrassment and a pandering asshat who will say or do anything if you think it will score you brownie points with the red hat crowd.

And on and on.

Pass the popcorn.

Previously:

Uh, the job description says Missouri (December 9, 2020)

The Republican Primary Mess

12 Tuesday May 2009

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

jack danforth, republican primary, Robin Carnahan, Roy Blunt, sam fox, Sarah Steelman, US Senate

The GOP primary for US Senate keeps getting weirder and weirder. Convinced that Roy Blunt isn’t up to the challenge of taking on Robin Carnahan in the general election, and that a fresh face outside of Washington might do the trick, party elders like former Senator Jack Danforth turned to… Thomas Schweich.

Thomas who? Well, he’s a visiting law professor and former Bush Administration official (which just screams fresh face for the GOP, I know) who apparently has a few friends in high places.  Friends like Sam Fox, the big GOP donor who also helped fund Swiftboat ads with a $50,000 donation well after the ads had been discredited. Danforth, Fox & Co. must have agreed on “fresh face” as a talking point, because they used it several times during the course of their argument for an alternative to Blunt.

Meanwhile, Sarah Steelman, edging toward an official declaration for Senate herself, is loving it. She instantly sent out an e-mail welcoming the competition:

The US Senate is a very important office and I am glad to see Mr. Schweich taking an interest in it. I don’t know what he stands for yet so I will be interested in learning his views about the role of government,” said Steelman. “I think the Republican Party needs to embrace people who are willing to run for office instead of letting political power brokers who are more interested in profiting off of government and retaining their power hand pick someone for the job. Let’s try having a little competition in the free market of ideas in the Republican Party instead of a monopoly,” Steelman added.

Practically speaking, she’s already the “fresh face” from outside Washington that Danforth & Co. are desperately looking for. I’m not saying that she really has any new ideas – her platform for governor was essentially boilerplate Republicanism – but she did run against virtually the entire GOP establishment and nearly pulled out a win. She’s fresher than a former Bush official handpicked by establishment money men, in any case.  

Recent Posts

  • Cymbal clapper
  • Uh, in case you were wondering, land doesn’t vote
  • Show us on your diploma where the professors hurt you…
  • Stormy Weather
  • Read the country, Mark (r)

Recent Comments

Winning at losing… on Passing the gas – Donald…
TACO Tuesday | Show… on TACO or Mushrooms?
TACO Tuesday | Show… on So much winning
So much winning | Sh… on Passing the gas – Donald…
What good is the 25t… on We are the only people on the…

Archives

  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,041,310 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

 

Loading Comments...