Still waiting to be interviewed by The New York Times about their economic anxiety
18 Monday Dec 2017
Posted in media criticism
18 Monday Dec 2017
Posted in media criticism
18 Monday Dec 2017
Posted in social media
This past weekend, from Representative Vicky Hartzler (r), via Twitter:
Rep. Vicky Hartzler @RepHartzler
Your Christmas tree looks better with #TaxReform! #MerryChristmas
[….]
10:32 AM – 16 Dec 2017
Well, there’s a lot to unpack in that.
Some of the responses:
There’s no CHIP renewal for Christmas, but at least we can see your party’s priorities more clearly.
My Christmas tree is suffering from lack of infrastructure funding, climate change and a Republican Party that thinks punishing poor people is somehow compatible with Christian morality.
Luke 12:33 “Sell your possessions and give to the needy” . Your literally using a Christian holiday to take from the poor and give to the rich while promoting consumerism. Charlatan. Better to read the Bible than thump it my friend.
Ugh…. wow. That’s quite a way to sell out your constituents.
Wow. I can’t believe the GOP is using that silly GIF to sell its point. But which gift is the $1.4T increase in the national debt? You’re gonna need a GIF that shows no presents for the next generation; only bills [….]
My tree will really be complete when I add the #TeamTreason ornaments.
‘Tis the season for a whole lotta treason!
#MuellerInvestigation #MuellerTime #TeamMueller #MerryChristmas #HappyHolidays
#holycrap that is so freggin’ cognitively dissonant that I am impressed with both your shear stupidity, boldness, and unquenchable greed.
you are proof that jesus christ’s existence never mattered!
#HappyHolidays
For the 1%.
You’re deplorable.
Nobody wants this, you tone-deaf fool.
This is the most moronic comparison I’ve ever seen.
So tell me did you cut subsidies to the farmers. Can’t hurt the old family implement business can we
You never get tired of the lies, do you? Elections are coming. Soon you’ll be gone. That’s when we’ll really celebrate.
You’re getting nothing for Christmas because #GOPTaxScam will kill thousands of Americans and wreck the economy. #Trump
Hardly.
You truly sickening me. Christmas is Jesus’ birthday, not an excuse to go buy a bunch of s*** nobody needs. Crawl back in your hole I’ve had enough of you this weekend.
Happy Holidays…
16 Saturday Dec 2017
Posted in Uncategorized
Tags
Ajit Pai, Billy Long, Blaine Luetkemeyer, Claire McCaskill, corruption, missouri, Net Neutrality, republicans, Roy Blunt
Last Wednesday 107 members of the U.S. House sent a letter to Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai urging him to revoke net neutrality regulations that have guaranteed that the big ISPs must treat all digital content equally, whatever it is and wherever it’s hosted. Without such rules broadband companies such as AT&T and Comcast can favor one website over another and charge users more to view certain material—such as streaming movies. They can potentially even censor political material they don’t like. In short, net neutrality is the backbone of the open internet we have all come to depend on. Without it, the digital community faces bleak times.
And Republicans want to destroy our thriving Internet culture – so much so that they wrote a letter to Trump’s FCC head lackey urging him to get down to business.
The letter was made public by the House Committee on Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Communications and Technology. Vice Media’s Motherboard has – so far- deciphered 84 of the 107 names (the writing is not always legible and a typed list of signatories was not included in the release) and listed them along with the amount of money each has received from the telecom industry over the years.
Two Missouri members are clearly listed among the telecom toadies who signed the letter:
Although there are only two Missouri House members whose signatures grace the letter, over the years, there haven’t been too many Missouri GOPers who have been very friendly to the idea of the open internet – and almost all have been liberally rewarded for toeing the telecom line when it comes to net neutrality.
GOP Senator Roy Blunt alone has received $1,283,416 from the big three telecoms over his career (yes, you read that right – over a million dollars). Only John McCain took a bigger payout. And Blunt delivered for his bosses in the past – spouting the usual unsupported twaddle about how net neutrality is bad for jobs and innovation. Jobs. You gotta give it to ol’ Roy – he’s more than willing to mouth whatever predigested magic formula Republicans have decided to use against everything their patrons tell them to oppose whether it makes sense or not.
To be fair, Democratic Senator Claire McCaskill has taken over $500,000 dollars from the same folks since she went to Washington. As a report prepared by the Center for Responsive Politics (CRP) has noted, “the industry’s attempt to gain favor with lawmakers is not partisan. Entrenched telecommunications companies liberally spread money and attention to everyone who holds office.”
So, what did they get from McCaskill? While she supported the nomination of Pai as FCC Chairman and has tried to straddle the issue in the past, she has, as of today, indicated that she will support legislation to restore net neutrality – which, of course, can only pass if Democrats succeed in taking back the Congress in 2018. In the long run, though, McCaskill knows that destroying the Internet is a bad deal – both for her constituents and for her politically – and she’s not nearly as mercenary as her GOP opposite number.
Even though Democrats have benefited from telecom efforts to buy congressional votes, it is nevertheless still true that, as the CRP observes, “alignment with the ISPs is currently drawn along party lines.” Republicans take their obligations to their donors seriously, probably because they get lots more money from them. If you’re curious about how many pieces of dirty silver your Missouri GOP House member has received from the telecom industry as the price for selling out their constituents, you can check the CRP tally for every House and Senate member.
Depressing, no?
15 Friday Dec 2017
Posted in social media
Tonight, from Jason Kander (D), via Twitter:
Jason Kander @JasonKander
Don’t give up. Your true hate is out there somewhere.Ann Coulter @AnnCoulter
We singles live empty lives of quiet desperation and will die alone. Now Rubio is demanding that we also fund happy families with children who fill their days with joy.
That is all.
15 Friday Dec 2017
Posted in Claire McCaskill, social media, US Senate
Today from Josh Hawley (r), via Twitter:
Josh Hawley @HawleyMO
On the eve of @clairecmc’s 50th town hall, Missouri families need to know about her 50 worst votes for higher taxes: [….] #mosen
9:43 AM – 15 Dec 2017
Some of the responses:
Well at least Missourians see her at public meetings instead of the wine aisle on a Friday afternoon, only public place you’re seen.
You may not want to mention how many town halls @clairecmc has held. MO repubs don’t have a great track record in that department.
Why haven’t you filed anything to save #NetNeutrality? Why are you refusing to investigate the governor’s violation of records laws? Why are you already running for higher office after you swore you weren’t just another politician climbing the ladder? Maybe you need a town hall.
Lol you are going to get crushed and I cannot wait.
LOL…Blunt is nowhere to be seen, Greitens is dismantling public education, and you turn your head while all of it happens in our state. Keep up the good work, @clairecmc! Thank you for looking out for Missourians.
Is that what is known as constructive criticism by the Greedy Old Party ??
Speaking of transparency, when are you and EricG going to publish your donor lists. You sound Koch-ish, no?
Really?! I can’t EVEN deal with you today. Why don’t YOU put yourself out there and talk to Missourians instead of having Chocolate Milk with @EricGreitens and @realDonaldTrump
Why does any of this matter to the Attorney General exactly?
I thought you said you weren’t gonna climb ladders like a career politician?
At least she isn’t afraid to meet people and make her case. You hide in Jefferson City…oh wait, do you actually illegally live in Columbia still? Hard to keep track of your lies these days.
Maybe you should do a townhall before you start the negative campaigning
You mean she’s out on there listening and talking to her constituents??? Sounds like a good Senator to me.
And if you had her seat right now you’d vote for the monstrous tax bill that raids the Treasury to shovel more wealth at the rich. You’d probably also vote to cut Social Security and Medicare. No thanks, I’ll vote McCaskill.
So that’s 50 more town halls than you’ve done? Still endorsing pedophile Moore for Senate?
Josh, why are you avoiding the public like a craven coward?
Thwack.
Previously:
Attorney General Josh Hawley (r): the pepul of Misoori our stoopit (January 23, 2017)
Josh Hawley (r): looking to unload that apartment in Jefferson City (October 10, 2017)
Josh Hawley (r): carrying that albatross around for a year ain’t gonna be easy (November 29, 2017)
15 Friday Dec 2017
Posted in campaign finance
Yesterday at the Missouri Ethics Commission:
C151082 12/14/2017 New Approach Missouri Belleau Farms Adolphus A Busch 1600 Highway 79 OFallon MO 63366 Retired Retired 12/14/2017 $100,000.00
[emphasis added]
That’s a lot of green.
Previously:
Campaign Finance: medical marijuana (June 3, 2017)
Campaign Finance: medical marijuana (October 7, 2017)
14 Thursday Dec 2017
Posted in social media
Tags
4th Congressional District, deregulation, Donald Trump, facebook, missouri, social media, Vicky Hartzler
If Net Neutrality goes down the tubes, well, yeah.
Today on Facebook, from Representative Vicky Hartzler (r):
Congresswoman Vicky Hartzler
I came to Washington with an “Undo List.” President Donald J. Trump is following through on his promise to remove burdensome government regulations from everyday Americans’ lives. Regulations should be judged by quality, not quantity. [….]
Some of the responses:
So when does this “quality” consideration kick in?
Are you considering net neutrality a burdensome government regulation?
Then I should thank you for raising my internet rates, making it harder to hold large banks accountable, taking away medicare and medicade support and cutting social security when your tax plan balloons the deficit? Like any politician, your words sound supportive, but the reality is something else again. You’re a party line supporter. And that party line is not drawn on the side of your average constituent.
At what expense? The American people. Yeah, a presidential policy where “undo” is the main goal does not inspire confidence or love. Working together, across all aisles and listening to all viewpoints to craft good bills/policies, edit out the bad parts of existing bills/policies and making society a better, safer, more inclusive place… that would be a great goal.
So when regulations disappear-corruption becomes common and then American people get screwed by the unregulated & greedy-shame on you, for taking away safeguards for regular Americans.
Whenever people talk about burdensome regulations, I’m reminded of the coal miner who said that regulations only happen when miners die.
If this is supposed to be a defense of your absolute failure to defend net neutrality, I want you to know that it falls on deaf ears.
You’ve been in Washington a long time. How did you “come to Washington to undo”? I also remember that you rode in on the Tea Party wave. Which, namely, was going to reduce the government deficit. How will this tax increase do that?
Seems to me your party intends to undo the Constitution.
Lie, cheat, and steal from consumers. It’s ok nobody’s watching! Not you? Then why do we need you?
You are nothing more than a GOP puppet. You don’t care about any of your constituents, you refuse to meet with us in any kind of town meeting or forum and you do what your Republican masters tell you. Your “To Do List” should be “To Do What the GOP Tells Me To Do List.” Also, we know that this post is about Net Neutrality even though you never mentioned it by name. You are a disgrace and I look forward to doing what I an to make sure you do not get another term.
What quality is there in simply undoing anything the previous president did? That just sounds like school yard shenanigans instead of adults serving the public. As always I hope to be wrong about you.
Of course you did, undo everything you can to improve your GOP pocketbooks. Anything that was helpful for the people you are wanting to undo including undoing taxes for the rich and undoing America to satisfy the party and putting us more in debt!!!!
…please, you are nothing more than a shill for trump who is a disgrace. Un-doing regulations is fine, but trump is simply undoing regulations because obama put them in place, and you know that to be true. He, and you, since you rubber stamp every move he makes, are ridiculous, and by your actions will be putting people in danger by some of the regulations you are haphazardly undoing. Do you even look at each and every one and why they are there, before you put it on the chopping block? As for the net neutrality, there is absolutely no reason for this, other than trump’s childish jealousy of obama. You, lady, should be ashamed that you follow meekly along with whatever this despicable buffoon does. I will never vote for you. You make me embarrassed for you.
10,000 dollars was all it took for you to be against Net Neutrality.
You’re a cheap date.
I am not too sure you want to be touting “a vote for me is a vote for Trump”.
Yeah, that’s going to be interesting to watch over the next eleven months.
Sorry to miss your town hall meeting via the telephone last night. Maybe you could call before 6:38 pm for a 6:00 pm start time. You know what would be even better? An actual, in person town hall meeting!
If your a business, it’s ok to plan your future and if that includes polluting the environment or exploiting people economically or manufacturing dangerous products, have at it.
Remove those regs that make a company that has hazarrdous material have safety plans, limits on how much can be stored, what can be stored together.
What could go wrong?
The old guys made a rule for a reason.
Unfortunately, Mr. Trump is doing the Steve Bannon, alt-right shuffle in an attempt to downsize the Federal Government. I am surprised that you are a proponent of his white supremacist, hateful ideas that only serve to divide our country along hard political lines and fosters the belief that we no longer have a need for separate branches of government with oversight. Sadly this oversight is one of the few things that benefits the common man and keeps authoritarians from destroying what has taken over 200 years to evolve. It shows where your priorities lie and those are not with most of your constituents, just your donors.
Hmmm….so since you don’t represent your constituents best interests, does that mean we get to replace you? What are your thoughts on that? How about a town hall to discuss this?
Yep, 2018 is going to be really interesting.
14 Thursday Dec 2017
Posted in Uncategorized
Tags
14 Thursday Dec 2017
Posted in Uncategorized
Guess what? Wanna have a little fun with that pesky liberal down the street? Just take your gun and wave it around in his/her front yard. Pretend you’re going to shoot out his/her windows while you’re at it. And don’t worry about a law enforcement response. After all, Poplar Bluff Attorney Daniel Moore has tendered his belief that you’d be within your 2nd amendment rights.
Seems that Moore’s client, Poplar Bluff’ Streets Superintendent, Denis Kearbey, took his “short-barrel shotgun to the clerk’s office on Sept. 12, pumped it several times and asked if the female clerk was scared.”
But hey, Kearbey declared later, after first denying the incident, he was only teasing the clerk about being a liberal – you know, having a little wingnut fun. If a good ol’ boy can’t tease one a them libtards with a potentially lethal weapon, we’ll never MAGA.
Kearbey’s now free on $25,000 bond and has pleaded not guilty, because, why not? In the words of his attorney, the aforementioned Daniel Moore: “Kearbey has a right to carry a firearm and denies any wrongdoing.” Moore added: “Fortunately the Second Amendment gives you quite a bit of protection.”
14 Thursday Dec 2017
Posted in Uncategorized
Tags
Alabama, campaign donations, missouri, Rely on Your Beliefs PAC, republicans, Roy Blunt, Roy Moore
Last Tuesday, the day of the Alabama special senate election, Randy Turner posted the following interesting tidbit:
The most recent campaign finance report filed with the Federal Election Commission shows no one gave more money to embattled Alabama U. S. Senate candidate Roy Moore than Sen. Roy Blunt.
Blunt’s support was not a personal contribution to Moore, but came in the form of a $5,000 contribution from Blunt’s Rely On Your Beliefs PAC.
Turner notes that other Republicans who gave big, like Mitch McConnell, asked for their money back when it became clear that Moore had sexually assaulted teenagers when he was in his thirties.
But not our Roy Blunt.
Blunt did talk the talk, stating unequivocally that “the women have a more credible story than Judge Moore. Alabama voters should have a better choice and Judge Moore should have better answers to these charges.”
Blunt just doesn’t seem willing to walk the walk.
Our MO GOP Senator’s just got a different point of view; we call it a “bottom-line” mentality. What’s good for the bottom line of his campaign donors – and the various lobbyists in his family – that is. And he evidently thought that insuring important deliverables by boosting a criminal (who avoids prosecution by virtue of Alabama statutes of limitation) was worth the moral taint. After all, Moore wouldn’t be the first criminal in Congress to offer a reliable Republican vote.
Given Roy Moore’s notorious Christian predilections it seems appropriate here to note the words of a famous religious figure Christians tell us they revere above all others: “By their fruits shall ye know them. Do you gather grapes from thorns, or figs from thistles?”(Matthew 7:16).
I’d advise you to keep an eye on those thorns and thistles sprouting in various congressional offices.
*Last two paragraphs revised slightly for clarity (12/16, 11:32 am)