• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Monthly Archives: May 2017

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): Okay, this is funny. And sad.

09 Tuesday May 2017

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

4th Congressional District, ACA, AHCA, health care, missouri, town halls, Trumpcare, Vicky Hartzler

Someone in Missouri’s 4th Congressional District has started an online fundraising campaign to pay Rep. Vick Hartzler (r) to actually have open public town halls in the district:

Rep. Hartzler’s AHCA Town Hall!

Vicky Hartzler represents almost 800,000 Missourians in 26 counties. But she hasn’t shown her face at a single town hall meeting. Maybe it’s because she keeps making big, unpopular decisions for Missouri, like voting for the AHCA, and she prefers to keep ignoring us. Here’s what the AHCA is predicted to accomplish:

– Increase premiums for older Americans by up to 5x.
– Cut nearly a trillion dollars from Medicaid over 10 years.
– Allow states to opt out of the most basic types of coverage.
– Cut taxes for the rich by $900 billion.
– Increase the costs of a healthy pregnancy to $17,600 while insured.
– Make healthcare inaccessible for 24 million people. 

For more information about the affects of the AHCA, read the bipartison Congressional Budget Office’s analysis and Vox’s analysis.

[….]

We are hoping to raise $17,600 for Representative Hartzler – the cost of a healthy pregnancy under the AHCA – to get her back in her district for in-person town hall meetings in at least three cities or towns in the next two months. Perhaps she can use this money to support the health of newborn babies, a constituency about which she is vocally passionate (see above). This is a unique opportunity for her to hear from her constituents.

We are tired of the lies that this legislation will somehow lower costs while keeping healthcare accessible. This is not true. The premise of health insurance is that everyone pays a little bit for the greater good. They make it work in every other developed country – why not ours?

Vicky, join us for a town hall and justify your choices – we’ll even pay you!

[….]

That would be a probability of zero.

Previously:

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): about that town hall (March 28, 2017)

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): making it easy (April 18, 2017)

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): Who’s that yonder, dressed in black? (May 4, 2017)

This.

09 Tuesday May 2017

Posted by Michael Bersin in social media, US Senate

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

congressional hearing, Donald Trump, Сделать Америку великой Снова, Russia, Sally Yates, U.S. Senate

On Twitter after yesterday’s Senate hearing on Donald Trump’s (r) continuing Russia problems:

Laura Seay‏ @texasinafrica
Ladies, if you doubt that you have what it takes to hold elected office, watch these men questioning Sally Yates. It should remove all fear.
2:05 PM – 8 May 2017

Yep, it was pretty apparent yesterday that the current occupant of the White House isn’t the first imbecile republicans have elected to high public office.

Sen. Claire McCaskill (D): on Trump’s policies and Missouri – May 6, 2017

08 Monday May 2017

Posted by Michael Bersin in US Senate

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

ACA, agriculture, AHCA, Claire McCaskill, Donald Trump, education, missouri, town hall, trade, Trumpcare

“…People need to know, all the major policies that have been announced so far by the Trump administration, all of them disadvantage rural Missouri…”

Senator Claire McCaskill (D) continued her face to face contact with constituents in Missouri on Saturday with several events in Kansas City.

The Greater Kansas City Women’s Political Caucus hosted a forum with Senator McCaskill midday. Close to one hundred fifty individuals attended. The Senator spoke for about twenty minutes then took questions for about an hour.

Senator Claire McCaskill (D) – May 6, 2017.

One of the questions was on Donald Trump’s (r) policies and agriculture in Missouri:

Senator Claire McCaskill (D): [….]

….People need to know, all the major policies that have been announced so far by the Trump administration, all of them disadvantage rural Missouri. [voice: “Yes.”]

Um, the health insurance plan, um, a, a farmer in Ralls County that makes thirty thousand dollars a year and is sixty years old, his premiums would go from about twenty-five hundred a year to about twelve thousand dollars a year under the plan that was passed by the House. That’s because he’s older and because he lives in a rural area. And those two things are a double whammy on their plan.

The second thing that hurts rural Missouri is education. Um, what they don’t, they haven’t figured out, [Secretary of Education] Betsy DeVos hasn’t figured out that the vast majority of my state there is no choice. [voices: “That’s right.”][applause] I mean, most people out in rural Missouri, there’s not a lot of private schools to pick from. There’s a public school system. Period. It’s the beating heart of those communities. And when you cream, when you skim the cream and money from public school it is directly hurting rural school districts so that private schools in the cities can get more money. Um, so that’s the second thing he’s done to rural Missouri.

The third thing he’s done to rural Missouri is his infrastructure plan. His infrastructure plan that we have seen, the only one we’ve seen, depends on private investment. Now I got news for you. Nobody wants to build a road and put toll on it between Chillicothe and Albany. [laughter] Nobody wants to fix a bridge down in Shannon County because there’s not enough traffic on it for it to make money for a private business. And when you do private infrastructure what you’re saying is we’re gonna toll roads and toll bridges. ‘Cause no private business invest in a road unless they’re gonna get their money back. [voice: “Right.”] They have to have a source of revenue.

Now I’m not, Missouri doesn’t have any tolling, and if other states want to toll, that’s fine. But I think we’ve got to make sure that the White House understands that for rural Missouri, for all of Missouri, we need to make sure there’s public money in the infrastructure bill so the needs can be met even if they’re not in highly trafficked areas. Okay.

The fourth thing, and the thing Kay was referring to, is trade. When you do bilateral trade deals and you cut countries off from multilateral trade deals. That causes retaliation. Okay. There is like, okay, you’re gonna do this to us, we’re gonna do this to you. There’s, for every action in the trade area there is a reaction. So, it’s not as simple as going that’s a bad deal we’re getting out of it. It’s what can we get in that will protect our agricultural economy in Missouri. And the, the scary thing about his back and forth on NAFTA in the last week, first of all, not only does that dramatically affect our corn growers and our bean growers ‘cause their number one export is Canada, their number two export is Mexico, their number three export is China, not only is it dramatically affect them it also affects companies like Kansas City Southern, the railroad, the big building downtown with lots of employees. Their stock went down five percent just when he said we’re gonna withdraw from NAFTA. Now, then he went back and reversed it. You know, he said, never mind the day. [laughter] But, this uncertainty with our agricultural economy in Missouri , and that has ripple effect all the way to the very, very heart of both Kansas City and St. Louis.

So, Mexico doesn’t have to buy corn from us. They can buy corn from Brazil. Um, China can, is, they’re about to open up foreign ownership in Brazil, China can buy a bunch of land in Brazil and grow cotton there and bring it back to China.

So, we’ve got to be really careful and there’s no question that our corn growers and our bean growers are in jeopardy with some of the trade policies that President Trump is talking about….

[….]

And yet, a majority in Missouri voted for him. Anyone think they’ll figure it out?

Previously:

What a difference eight years makes (April 13, 2017)

If only Roy Blunt (r) could give him something to do at one of his open town halls in Missouri (April 13, 2017)

This ain’t 2009 and right wingnut billionaires ain’t paying to rile up teabaggers (April 13, 2017)

Senator Claire McCaskill (D): press availability – Parkville, Missouri – April 13, 2017 (April 14, 2017)

Sen. Claire McCaskill (D): on Zombie Trumpcare – May 6, 2017 (May 7, 2017)

Sen. Claire McCaskill (D): on Trump and Russia – May 6, 2017 (May 7, 2017)

It’s another day to #resist

08 Monday May 2017

Posted by Michael Bersin in Resist

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

#resist, missouri, sunrise

This morning in west central Missouri:

Sunrise.

#resist

Sen. Claire McCaskill (D): on Trump and Russia – May 6, 2017

07 Sunday May 2017

Posted by Michael Bersin in US Senate

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

Claire McCaskill, Congressional investigations, Сделать Америку великой Снова, FBI investigation, hacking, Kansas City, missouri, Russia, tax returns, town hall

“…it is really whether or not the criminal investigation that is ongoing at the FBI is gonna be able to follow the money around to his associates during the campaign…”

Senator Claire McCaskill (D) continued her face to face contact with constituents in Missouri yesterday with several events in Kansas City.

The Greater Kansas City Women’s Political Caucus hosted a forum with Senator McCaskill midday. Close to one hundred fifty individuals attended. The Senator spoke for about twenty minutes then took questions for about an hour.

Senator Claire McCaskill (D) – May 6, 2017.

One of the questions was on Donald Trump (r) releasing his tax returns:

Senator Claire McCaskill (D): ….I don’t know whether we’ll ever see Donald Trump’s taxes or not. I am not as convinced that his taxes would tell us a lot. Um, you know, tax returns are not as informative as people might believe, um, especially when you have a lot and lots of complicated financial structures.

Um, it, it is really whether or not the criminal investigation that is ongoing at the FBI is gonna be able to follow the money around to his associates during the campaign. And whether or not there will ever be enough, either circumstantial or direct evidence, to indicate that he was aware of some of the activities that were going on.

And that is way more important. Now, I get it that he is the first president that hasn’t done it. And it’s possible, because you do have to disclose foreign money, it is possible that there’s foreign money on those taxes. Um, but, I do think that, and the taxes may end up being produced as part of these investigations, ‘cause we’ve got three different investigations going on in Congress. And then of course, we have the FBI investigation.

Um, I, I, I know some things that are classified that I can’t share with you, but there’s many things that aren’t classified. And that is, for example, Russia had hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of people on their payroll doing nothing all day but creating Facebook accounts. All day long. For months on end. In order to drive news stories and to drive, and we know the algorithms jumped right before the election. And we believe these algorithms jumped because of these Russian efforts. And what they were doing, they were trying to hit three places in the key states, in Pennsylvania, in Wisconsin, and Michigan. What they were doing, they were to hit African American men, Bernie Sanders supporters, and, um, [….] young women, maybe. And they were trying to feed into their Facebooks, for example, for African American men they were feeding into the Facebooks the comment that Hillary Clinton made at one point about predators. And they were, they were doing a complicated algorithm where they were trying to find Facebook pages where there was some indication that some member of their family had been in jail or was in jail. [voice: “Oh my God.”] And they were targeting Bernie supporters with, the reason all that stuff about the rigged primary happened when it did? They released that right as we went into the convention, the Russians did. That all of the hacked e-mails, to try to undermine unity, undermine enthusiasm within the Democratic Party for Hillary Clinton.

So, this was sophisticated stuff Russia was doing. And that kind of stuff hasn’t gotten as much attention as some of the other things that they’ve done. So, um, and, then we know that many of their associates had direct and indirect contact with Russia in a variety of capacities. So, there’s real stuff going on in these investigations. And shoes will continue to drop. We had another shoe drop just yesterday where we now learn that they were copying classified documents in the transition office and removing them from there, uh, around the time Michael Flynn was meeting with the Russian ambassador who, um, he knew was directly tied to Russian intelligence, so. [Voice: “We’re really in a mess, aren’t we?”] Kinda are.

[….]

Oh my.

Previously:

What a difference eight years makes (April 13, 2017)

If only Roy Blunt (r) could give him something to do at one of his open town halls in Missouri (April 13, 2017)

This ain’t 2009 and right wingnut billionaires ain’t paying to rile up teabaggers (April 13, 2017)

Senator Claire McCaskill (D): press availability – Parkville, Missouri – April 13, 2017 (April 14, 2017)

Sen. Claire McCaskill (D): on Zombie Trumpcare – May 6, 2017 (May 7, 2017)

Liberté, égalité, fraternité

07 Sunday May 2017

Posted by Michael Bersin in social media

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Donald Trump, France, Jason Kander, missouri, social media, trolling, Twitter

The people of France didn’t let the Russians chose their president today.

From Jason Kander (D) this evening, via Twitter:

Jason Kander‏ @JasonKander
I’m reassured that we have an ally in France that will stand up to Putin since we don’t have anyone in the White House who will.
6:41 PM – 7 May 2017

That left a mark.

“Louie, I think this is the beginning of a beautiful friendship.”

Sen. Claire McCaskill (D): on Zombie Trumpcare – May 6, 2017

07 Sunday May 2017

Posted by Michael Bersin in US Senate

≈ 5 Comments

Tags

ACA, AHCA, Claire McCaskill, Kansas City, missouri, town hall, Trumpcare

“…It is very simple. They are cutting eight hundred and forty billion dollars from the Medicaid program, okay, in order to give a tax break of over a trillion to wealthy people and corporations. That’s it…”

Senator Claire McCaskill (D) continued her face to face contact with constituents in Missouri yesterday with several events in Kansas City.

The Greater Kansas City Women’s Political Caucus hosted a forum with Senator McCaskill midday. Close to one hundred fifty individuals attended. The Senator spoke for about twenty minutes then took questions for about an hour.

Senator Claire McCaskill (D) – May 6, 2017.

Senator McCaskill’s (D) remarks on the republican controlled House of Representatives attempting to resurrect Zombie Trumpcare:

Senator Claire McCaskill (D): [….]

….I think that the House of Representatives made a grave error this week. [voices: “Yes.”] I think that they have, um, under the umbrella of thinking they needed to have a, the president wanted to have a quote, unquote, win they have passed a piece of legislation that is, um, frankly stunning if you really understand what it is. Now, I will admit, like the people who voted for it, I have not reviewed it, uh. [laughter] I have not had a chance to go through it line by line, but I certainly will. But my staff has had an opportunity to look at it and, um, let me make sure you understand what it is so you can go out and tell all of your friends and neighbors. It is very simple.

They are cutting eight hundred and forty billion dollars from the Medicaid program, okay, in order to give a tax break of over a trillion to wealthy people and corporations. [hand slaps] [voice: “That’s horrible.”]That’s it.

It is the contraction of health care services in order to give a tax break. This is a tax break bill. It’s not a health care bill. Now, you can, people, they, they would argue and they would say, well we can’t afford Medicaid program expansion, we can’t afford all the money we’re spending on Medicaid, we have to cut Medicaid.

And here’s what everybody needs to understand – in this country when you show up at the doors of Truman Medical Center and you are sick we take care of you. [voice: “Yes, that’s correct.”] Right? [voice: “Yes.”] I always tell the story of a twenty-seven year old man that lives down in Cole County. And he can, he’s finally making enough money at work, they don’t have insurance at work, that he can either buy insurance or a Harley. Well, guess what he buys? [voices: “Harley”] Buys the Harley. Gets out on the highway, somebody cuts him off, puts it on the pavement, he has traumatic brain injuries, he gets Life flighted to St. Lukes, or VJC or Truman, and we give him millions of dollars of health care. Right? [voices: “Right.”] Because we don’t stop ‘em at the door and say, I’m sorry, you bought the Harley and not insurance, we’re gonna let you die. [voice: “That’s right.”] We bring ‘em in and we them the best medical care in the world. And, by the way, he may have such a debilitating brain injury that we have to, he has to go to rehab and then he has to have help the rest of his life, is on disability. And I ask all of you, who pays that bill? [voices: “We do.”] Of course we do.

When you don’t expand Medicaid, when you cut the Medicaid program it just ups the number of people without insurance. [voice: “That’s right.”] And that is just shorthand for your premiums go up. Because when uninsured care goes up at Truman Medical Center there isn’t somebody magically who shows up and says, we’re gonna pay the bill. Here’s what happens – uninsured care goes up, they can’t balance the books, Truman Medical center calls the insurance companies, they call Blue Cross Blue Shield over here and they say, we’re gonna have to charge you more for labor and delivery, and we’re gonna have to charge you more for an angioplasty because we have too much uninsured care so our prices have to go up. And then that insurance company calls your employer and says, I got news for you, your premiums next year for your group policy are gonna go up ten percent. So, you are paying eight per cent more in your insurance premiums in Missouri just because Missouri legislature won’t expand Medicaid. [vice: “Why can’t the Republicans get that?”] I don’t know. [voices: “Why?”] I don’t know. [….] [voice: “Are they that stupid?”] I, I, I don’t know. I don’t know. [voices: “They are.”] I,I, just, I think it’s really important that we stay focused that this is cutting Medicaid to give a tax break to wealthy people. [voices: “yeah.”] That’s what this is. And, and along the way they’ve decided to make it five times more expensive for seniors than younger people, they’ve decided to make it more expensive for rural people, they’ve decided also that if states want to they can avoid, uh, the requirement of certain benefits and even the requirement of, of having to be fair to people who have the nerve to be sick before.

So, um, I do not think this bill will ever become law. Uh, I can’t imagine that my Senate colleagues on the other side of the aisle are going to be excited about voting for this, especially once the CBO [Congressional Budget Office] score comes out. Everybody says, why would they do it before the CBO score came out? Well, it’s very simple. They knew they couldn’t pass it once the CBO score comes out. So, the CBO score will come out and that will make it even more difficult for this bill to have any kind of traction in the Senate. So, I don’t think the bill will pass the Senate. I don’t know what they will come up with in the Senate. They’re struggling. Uh, it’s hard. It’s hard to cover people with preexisting conditions if you don’t have a mechanism to make sure healthy people pay into it, too. Uh, that’s what insurance is, right? [voice: “Amen, amen.”] Insurance is healthy people paying the bills for sick people. [voice: “That’s right.”] That’s what insurance is. And you kind of signed up for the bargain in that process. [….]

So, the bottom line is, the reason that we don’t have single payer, the reason we don’t have, uh, a public option is because there hasn’t been enough political support for it. Um, that’s why other countries have it, is because their people have, um, decided that the, there’s enough support for it out in the community. Um, and I do think having some kind of quasi public option for people in [inaudible] where there are not choices for your insurance policy makes perfect sense and is a solution that we’re working on trying to get into whatever they’re doing. I, my idea is if you’re in a county where there’s only one insurance company on the exchange or whether there’s none, that you ought to be able to buy into the federal system. [voices: “Yeah.” “Right.”] Uh, that federal employees have. Or buy into Medicare or Medicaid. [applause] So, that’s what we’re going to try to get done.

Uh, and, and so, I hope you guys spread the word on this health care bill because I do think it’s a mechanism by which we can keep people engaged and involved.

[….]

A clear day in Kansas City, from the twenty-second floor:

Previously:

What a difference eight years makes (April 13, 2017)

If only Roy Blunt (r) could give him something to do at one of his open town halls in Missouri (April 13, 2017)

This ain’t 2009 and right wingnut billionaires ain’t paying to rile up teabaggers (April 13, 2017)

Senator Claire McCaskill (D): press availability – Parkville, Missouri – April 13, 2017 (April 14, 2017)

Don’t count on Senators like Roy Blunt to do the right thing about healthcare

06 Saturday May 2017

Posted by willykay in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

ACA, AHCA, Obamacare, Repeal and Replace, Roy Blunt, Trumpcare, U.S. Senate

Lots of progressive commentators are consoling themselves for last week’s congressional healthcare disaster by telling us that the Trumpcare abomination won’t fly in the Senate where GOP “moderate” senators will prevail. Or whatever. It is true that the GOP-majority Senate has, as an entity, turned up its collective nose when confronted with the stench of the House bill and has committed to producing its very own version of Trumpcare (a.k.a. Dump & Dupe). In order to keep the Dump & Dupe momentum going , House Speaker Mitch McConnell (R-Ky) sicced a working group on the topic right away.

But before we get too optimistic about the final Senate product, consider that Missouri Republican Senator Roy Blunt is part of the working group. This is the same Roy Blunt who was charged in 2009 to come up with the Republican alternative to Obamacare. Remember that plan? I bet you don’t. The four page document Blunt produced was that bad. As a Kansas City Star editorial pointed out, it was short on details and long on opinion-based talking points. Nor had Blunt bothered bothered to suss out the costs of his proposals and the number of uninsured Americans it would cover. It was a sort of abbreviated GOP la-la land fantasy.

Details aren’t important to folks like Blunt whose only language is right-wing power – let the real-world consequences be damned. And he’s what passes for a Republican moderate these days. He’s already signaled that he was fine with many of the provisions of the earlier, terrible iterations of Trumpcare, asserting that ““the nucleus of the plan is clearly there.” The only part of the earlier bills he objected to was the fact “it may not be a plan that gets a majority of votes and lets us move on.”

Nor is Roy Blunt a lone ranger in the Senate. Still feeling optimistic about the Senate’s take on Dump & Dupe?

When Blunt offered his four-page outline back in 2009, the House Speaker, Rep. John Boehner (R-OH), averred that “we have to be careful not to impede what works in the current system,” adding that “we take the current health care system and make it better for all Americans.” If it strikes you that this might be a good idea today – take what works in Obamacare – which is a lot – and make it better, perhaps you should phone old Roy and let him know that this is what you’d like to see come out of the Senate. Republicans can always save face by calling it Trumpcare.

Of course, that particular course of action would require that Blunt and his Senate GOP cronies actually cared about their constituents.

So maybe you should also let Senator Blunt know that you’ll remember whose fault it is if he helps  Freedom yodelers like Ann Wagner do our healthcare in. He won’t be up for election for several years, but it isn’t only elephants who don’t forget.

“Freedom” Ann Wagner Style

06 Saturday May 2017

Posted by willykay in Uncategorized

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

AHCA, Ann Wagner, missouri, Obamacaare, Trumpcare

Well, they did it. The Republican members of the U.S. House of Representatives put Obamacare on the butcher’s block and started blindly hacking. The bloody mess that they’re now serving up would deny healthcare to millions of Americans, but, hey, at least, Big Orange got his ego stoked with a big “win.”

One of the prime ego stokers was Rep. Ann Wagner (R-2) who celebrated – perhaps at Big Orange’s Rose Garden beer-bust victory lap? – by screaming the word “freedom,” which she identified as “the line of the day, out of Braveheart.” As you will note if you check out the video, Riverfront Times‘ s Paul Friswold aptly captured Wagner’s tone, declaring that “she preened and cooed,” and seemed “positively giddy with anticipation at ripping healthcare away from millions of American citizens.”

Tasteless, yes. But it also suggests that Wagner’s conception of freedom is very special. Enumerating some of the actual provisions of Trumpcare 3.0 (which I base on Paul Waldman’s thorough summary, quoting directly at times) gives us the following anatomy of Braveheart Annie’s idea of healthcare freedom:

  • Freedom from healthcare for everyday Americans:
    • Frees upwards of 24 million from their insurance coverage:
    • Frees states from the Medicaid expansion that covered a considerable portion of those 24 million Americans if their legislators are, like those in Missouri, inclined to say that only rich folks folks deserve healthcare.
    • Frees states from a big portion of their federal Medicaid funding by cutting $880 billion dollars from the program over 10 years.
    • Frees states to kick “otherwise eligible” people off Medicaid once federal funding becomes block-grants – which are likely to diminish over time.
    • Frees middle income people from the ACA subsidies, “replacing them with far more meager tax credits pegged not to people’s income but to their age. Poorer people would get less than they do now, while richer people would get more.”
  • Freedom for insurance companies to run wild:
    • Frees insurance companies from constraints that kept them from charging older people as much as five times more than they charge younger people for insurance.
    • Frees insurance companies to impose yearly and lifetime caps on what they will pay to cover illnesses – a provision that could also affect those who get their insurance through their employers.
    • Frees insurance companies – in states that seek waivers – from requirements that they offer plans that cover essential benefits guaranteed under Obamacare, things like “such as emergency services, hospitalization, mental health care, preventive care, maternity care, and substance abuse treatment.”
    • Frees insurance companies from having to give coverage to those with preexisting conditions and will allow them to charge them dramatically more if they do offer such coverage. It establishes expensive and inefficient “high-risk” pools for those with preexisting conditions while failing to offer adequate funding to cover the number of people who suffer from chronic illnesses.
    • Frees insurance companies to set higher deductibles for patients.
    • Frees insurance companies to reinstate medical underwriting so that when “you apply for insurance you’ll have to document every condition or ailment you’ve ever had,”  which in turn allows the insurers to identify your preexisting conditions and either deny coverage or charge you a fortune.
  • Freedom for rich people to sock it away:
    • Frees families making more that $250,000 a year from paying billions of dollars in taxes.

So much freedom. This version of Trumpcare isn’t too likely to survive the Senate. But we better never forget that Rep. Wagner tried to give us freedom Donald Trump style. Someone, somewhere (I can’t recall where) called her freedom scream her “let them eat cake moment.” Me, personally, I think of the Howard Dean scream – if her opponents don’t play this nasty little performance over and over again in TV ads next year, they’re fools.

Maybe Trumpcare might just help free Ann Wagner too. Free her from her current job, that is.

At least one creature knows what it’s supposed to be doing

05 Friday May 2017

Posted by Michael Bersin in Resist, Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Allium, bee, missouri, Resist

This afternoon in west central Misouri.

Allium.

Apparently no one at the White House does.

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • Campaign Finance: offered without further comment
  • Campaign Finance: “…and they shall sow the public right of way and all the empty lots across the land with their yard signs…”
  • What color is the sky in Denny’s (r) world?
  • Burg Resist – Defend Democracy Rally and Voter Registration Drive – Warrensburg, Missouri – October 3, 2026
  • Schmitt’s Very Bad Week

Recent Comments

Campaign Finance:… on Campaign Finance: bring a nuke…
Campaign Finance:… on Campaign Finance: Next
Steve Duane Phipps on Burg Resist – Defend Dem…
What color is the sk… on Being obtusely wrong still mak…
What color is the sk… on Justice Brett Kavanaugh…

Archives

  • October 2026
  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,090,517 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...