• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Tag Archives: education

Thanks for nothing, Brandon Phelps (r)….

02 Monday Nov 2026

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

54th Legislative District, Brandon Phelps, Budget cuts, education, gaslighting, K-12, state funding, survey, Warrensburg R-VI

Brandon Phelps (r): we get a slick mail piece (October 24, 2026)

“…Missouri ranks 49th out of 50 in state funding for public education…”

Yep.

Brandon Phelps (r): Public Education? Not so much… (October 29, 2026)

Underfunded public schools by $190M.

Allocated $60M in public funds to private schools

Put elimination of the state income tax on the ballot, which could have cost public schools $1.4 billion

Brandon Phelps (r) [2025 file photo].

Now, it comes home to roost.

A survey by the Warrensburg R-VI School District, distributed to the district community:

School Funding Priorities – Fall 2026

The Warrensburg R-VI School District is facing significant financial challenges that will require us to reduce expenditures in the 2027-28 school year by approximately 4–5%. These reductions are needed due to a combination of rising costs, increased spending for employee benefits, and lack of full funding of the basic formula for education at the state level. These reductions will likely involve difficult decisions, including reductions in staffing, programs, and services.

As we work through this process, it is important that the Board of Education and district leadership understand what our community values most and where we believe resources should be prioritized.

This survey is intended to gather feedback from parents, students, employees, and community members about the broader priorities that should guide these decisions. Rather than focusing on individual programs or positions, we are asking you to consider the overall educational experience we provide and the trade-offs that may be necessary to sustain it.

Your feedback will help inform discussions and decision-making as we work to maintain a strong educational experience for Warrensburg students while ensuring the district’s long-term financial sustainability.

The survey should take approximately 5–7 minutes to complete.

We would ask that all surveys be completed by 3:00pm on Friday, November 6, 2026.

Thank you for taking the time to share your perspective and for supporting the Warrensburg R-VI School District.

*
1. Which of the following best describes your connection to the Warrensburg School District?
(Required.)

Parent/Guardian

Student

District Employee

Community Member

Parent/Guardian and District Employee

Other (please specify)

2. If you are a parent, guardian, or student, which school(s) are you connected to?

Morris Collins Early Childhood Center

Ridge View Elementary

Maple Grove Elementary

Sterling Elementary

Martin Warren Elementary

Warrensburg Middle School

Gateway Alternative Center

Warrensburg Area Career Center

Warrensburg High School

None of the above

3. If you are a student, what grade are you in?

Elementary (K-5th Grade)

6th-8th Grade

9th-10th Grade

11th-12th Grade

*
4. Where do you live?
(Required.)

Within Warrensburg City Limits

Within the school district, but outside Warrensburg

Outside the School District

*
5. Which THREE of the following should be the district’s highest priorities when making difficult financial decisions?
(Required.)

Providing equitable educational opportunities across all schools and grade levels

Providing student support services, including counseling, mental health, and special education

Maintaining extracurricular opportunities, including athletics, activities, and clubs

Maintaining current school calendars and instructional time

Maintaining safe, clean, and well-maintained school facilities

Maintaining a broad range of electives, enrichment, and career/technical education opportunities

Maintaining strong academic programs and core instruction

Providing competitive salaries and cost-of-living increases for employees

Maintaining reasonable classroom sizes and student-to-teacher ratios

Maintaining current staffing levels and avoiding reductions in employees

*
6. When considering potential budget reductions, which statement most closely reflects your perspective?
(Required.)

Protect core academic instruction, even if some extracurricular or elective programs must be reduced.

Other / I am Unsure

Protect current staffing levels, even if some programs or services must be reduced.

Make reductions across multiple areas so that no single program or area bears the majority of the cuts.

Protect employee salaries and cost-of-living increases, even if some programs or services must be reduced.

Protect a broad range of student programs and opportunities, even if classroom sizes or staffing levels increase.

*
7. If the district must reduce some programs or services to preserve others, which approach would you generally support?
(Required.)

Make smaller reductions across a wide range of programs and services

Reduce or eliminate programs that are less essential to the overall educational experience in order to protect higher-priority programs.

Reduce programs that have the least impact on student academic success.

Reduce or eliminate programs that serve fewer students or have lower participation.

Avoid program reductions whenever possible, even if that means making deeper staffing reductions.

I am unsure / Need more information

*
8. How important is it to provide employees with annual salary increases that help keep pace with the cost of living?
(Required.)

Extremely important

Very Important

Somewhat important

Not so important

Not at all important

*
9. If providing employee cost-of-living increases requires reductions in other areas, which statement best reflects your perspective?
(Required.)

Prioritize cost-of-living increases, even if some programs or services must be reduced

Balance employee compensation with maintaining student programs and services

Prioritize maintaining student programs and services, even if employee increases are smaller.

Avoid salary increases if they require reductions in other areas.

Unsure

*
10. Which of the following would you be most willing to support if reductions are necessary? (Select up to three.)
(Required.)

Reducing the number of programs offered across the district

Reducing some extracurricular activities

Reducing or eliminating programs with low participation

Making smaller reductions across many areas

Increasing class sizes in some grade levels or subjects

Reducing employee salary increases

Reducing administrative or operational expenditures

Reducing staffing through attrition or not filling some vacant positions

Reducing some elective or enrichment opportunities

None of the above

11. What is one thing you believe the district should make every effort to protect as it works through these financial challenges?

12. Is there anything else you would like the Board of Education and district leadership to consider as they make difficult financial decisions?

So much for supporting public education, eh?

“…Brandon Phelps puts our kids, teachers, and classrooms first…”

Yeah, no.

Rick Brattin (r): Public Education? Not so much…

29 Thursday Oct 2026

Posted by Michael Bersin in Congress, Missouri General Assembly

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

31st Senate District, 5th Congressional District, education, funding, General Assembly, Rick Brattin, right wingnut

Rick Brattin (r) is the current Missouri State Senator in the 31st Senate District. He is running for Congress (badly) in Missouri’s 5th Congressional District.

Rick Brattin (r) [2013 file photo].

A legislative vote scorecard on public education:

Parents for Missouri Public Schools

2026 education scorecard

How your legislators voted on public schools
A legislator’s votes are the clearest record of what they value. Speeches, mailers, and yard signs are promises. Roll calls are what actually happened to our kids’ classrooms.

Use our tool to find your legislators, check how they voted on critical issues that impact school funding, and see who is on your ballot. Remember, vote by November 3rd!

Senate District 31
Sen. Rick Brattin
R

Absent
HB 2002 School funding
Underfunded public schools by $190M.

Yes
HB 2012 Voucher funding
Allocated $60M in public funds to private schools

Yes
HJRs 173 & 174 Tax amendment
Put elimination of the state income tax on the ballot, which could have cost public schools $1.4 billion

About these votes

HB 2002: FY 2027 K-12 education budget; kept the foundation formula about $190M below what state law requires. Senate Amendment 2 (Apr 22) would have fully funded it and failed 10-20. Vote reflects roll call at final passage (May 6).

HB 2012: FY 2027 budget for statewide officials, including the State Treasurer’s MOScholars private school voucher program. Vote reflects roll call at final passage (May 6).

HJRs 173 & 174: joint resolution placing the income tax amendment on the Aug 4, 2026 ballot as Amendment 5 (rejected by voters). House final = Apr 21 vote agreeing to the Senate version; Senate = Apr 15 passage. Vote reflects roll call at final passage (House Apr 21, Senate Apr 15).

[….]

[emphasis added]

“Absent”

Vote accordingly.

Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D) [2026 file photo].

Brandon Phelps (r): Public Education? Not so much…

29 Thursday Oct 2026

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

54th Legislative District, Brandon Phelps, budget, education, General Assembly, missouri, Private School Vouchers, Public Education, Taigan Plummer

Brandon Phelps (r) [left], Taigan Plummer (D) [right] [2026 file photo].

A legislative vote scorecard on public education:

Parents for Missouri Public Schools

2026 education scorecard

How your legislators voted on public schools
A legislator’s votes are the clearest record of what they value. Speeches, mailers, and yard signs are promises. Roll calls are what actually happened to our kids’ classrooms.

Use our tool to find your legislators, check how they voted on critical issues that impact school funding, and see who is on your ballot. Remember, vote by November 3rd!

House District 54
Rep. Brandon Phelps
R

Yes
HB 2002 School funding
Underfunded public schools by $190M.

Yes
HB 2012 Voucher funding
Allocated $60M in public funds to private schools

Yes
HJRs 173 & 174 Tax amendment
Put elimination of the state income tax on the ballot, which could have cost public schools $1.4 billion

About these votes

HB 2002: FY 2027 K-12 education budget; kept the foundation formula about $190M below what state law requires. Senate Amendment 2 (Apr 22) would have fully funded it and failed 10-20. Vote reflects roll call at final passage (May 6).

HB 2012: FY 2027 budget for statewide officials, including the State Treasurer’s MOScholars private school voucher program. Vote reflects roll call at final passage (May 6).

HJRs 173 & 174: joint resolution placing the income tax amendment on the Aug 4, 2026 ballot as Amendment 5 (rejected by voters). House final = Apr 21 vote agreeing to the Senate version; Senate = Apr 15 passage. Vote reflects roll call at final passage (House Apr 21, Senate Apr 15).

[….]

[….]

[emphasis added]

There you go.

Vote accordingly.

“Silence is Violence”

09 Sunday Feb 2025

Posted by Michael Bersin in Resist

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

dissent, education, human rights, immigration, Kansas City, LGBTQIA+ rights, misssouri, protest, The Plaza, Trump administration, women's rights

Late yesterday afternoon around 300 individuals gathered at Mill Creek Park along 47th Street to protest, rally, and march in Kansas City, Missouri against the actions of Donald Trump (r) and his administration.

“Silence is Violence”

“Impeach Him by the Pussy”

“Down with Fascism”

“Some of Those That Hold Office Are the Same That Burn Crosses”

“Stop Pretending Your Racism Is Patriotism”

“America is a Nation of Immigrants”

“No Human Being Is Illegal”

“The Only Minority Harming This Country Is The 1%”

“We Shall Overcomb”

Media interview – Manny Abarca.

We like this sign so much – we had to put it up again:

“Josh Hawley (r) is Still a rat Bastard”

Not a popular guy at this event.

#FDT

“Respect Our Existence Or Expect Our Resistance”

“Equal Rights For Others Doesn’t Mean Less For You – It’s Not Pie”

In the street on the march through the Plaza:

In Mill Creek Park after the march:

Previously:

Not exactly a fan (February 8, 2025)

“Don’t Tell Me to Calm Down” (February 8, 2025)

“Feed the Poor, Eat the Rich” (February 9, 2025)

“Feed the Poor, Eat the Rich”

09 Sunday Feb 2025

Posted by Michael Bersin in Resist

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

#resist, dissent, education, human rights, immigration, Kansas City, LGBTQIA+ rights, Mill Creek Park, missouri, protest, The Plaza, Trump administration, women's rights

Late yesterday afternoon around 300 individuals gathered at Mill Creek Park along 47th Street to protest, rally, and march in Kansas City, Missouri against the actions of Donald Trump (r) and his administration.

Along the north side of 47th Street.

“Feed the Poor, Eat the Rich”

“Confederates and Nazis: Fucking Losers”

For those keeping score – no wins, two losses.

“Resist”

“Nobody Elected Elon Musk”

“No human being is illegal”

Driving past the demonstration:

WankPanzer.

“…Welcome to the Revolution”

The Kansas City metro area ABC affiliate covered the demonstration. An interview:

“Immigrants Built America”

“If you wanted teachers to let ICE take our students you shouldn’t have taught us to take a bullet for them”

“Oligarchy equals Tyranny”

The resistance is vocal and growing.

Previously:

Not exactly a fan (February 8, 2025)

“Don’t Tell Me to Calm Down” (February 8, 2025)

HB 1024: pearl clutching du jour

03 Monday Feb 2025

Posted by Michael Bersin in Missouri General Assembly, Missouri House

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

DEI, education, General Assembly, HB 1024, Mark Meirath, missouri, right wingnut

On being fashionable.

In the Missouri General Assembly:

HB 1024 Prohibits educational institutions from using state funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion purposes

Sponsor: Meirath, Mark (039)
Proposed Effective Date: 8/28/2025
LR Number: 2244H.01I
Last Action: 01/27/2025 – Read Second Time (H)
Bill String: HB 1024
Next House Hearing: Hearing not scheduled
Calendar: Bill currently not on a House calendar
[….]

“…His professional background and commitment to his community equip him to serve his district with a practical, solutions-oriented approach…”

Is somebody going to tell him?

In the bill [pdf]:

[….]
173.2560. 1. This section shall be known and may be cited as the “Defunding Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Higher Education Act”.
[….]

[….]
(2) “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” or “DEI”, any educational program course, initiative, or curriculum designed to promote, teach, or enforce principles related to diversity, equity, and inclusion. DEI includes, but is not limited to, training, workshops, curriculum materials, student groups, and any other program or event related to such subjects.
[….]

That was so very…tautological. They have no idea what they’re supposed to be so bothered about.

Lord knows, we don’t want to acknowledge our diversity, include everyone, or treat everyone fairly.

“…For the poor it consists in sustaining and preserving the wealthy in their power and their laziness. The poor must work for this, in presence of the majestic quality of the law which prohibits the wealthy as well as the poor from sleeping under the bridges, from begging in the streets, and from stealing bread…” “The Red Lily” (1894), Anatole France

[….]
(2) (a) An educational institution that uses state funding for activities related to DEI shall return the amount of state funding used for such activities to the state treasury.
(b) In addition to the repayment of state funding, the offending educational institution shall lose all state funding for the fiscal year in which the violation occurs.
[….]

Punitive. They must really hate acknowledging our diversity, including everyone, and treating everyone fairly

[….]
4. (1) The department shall establish procedures to monitor the use of state funding in educational institutions and ensure compliance with this section.
(2) Any resident of the state or employee of an educational institution may file a complaint with the department if such individual believes an educational institution has violated this section.
(3) The department shall issue an annual report detailing the enforcement of this section. Such report shall include the number of violations and the total amount of state funding recovered.
[….]

Ah, the surveillance state along with a dash of snitch ethos. That’s so 21st-Century right wingnut.

“They’ll try to bury us.”
(2024)
Posterboard. Permanent marker. 22 x 28.
4th in a series of 2024 protest signs.

Lawyer Larry Keeps Busy

11 Saturday Feb 2023

Posted by penroseonpolitics in Missouri General Assembly

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

education, Education Politics, Missouri Attorney General, Missouri Book Bans, Missouri Education, Missouri Legislature, Missouri Republican Party, Missouri schools, State Censorship of Education, Teacher Cartoon

Because I are an education expert

31 Saturday Dec 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in Missouri General Assembly, Missouri House, social media

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

137th Legislative District, Darin Chappell, defunding public education, education, missouri, right wingnut, social media

On the road to defunding public education:

Darin Chappell @DKChappell
I’ve heard the arguments, and examined the data. I am convinced it is time for school choice in Missouri.

No child should be confined to a failing school simply because of his/her zip code. The only decision makers for where a child should be educated are the parents.
12:05 AM · Dec 31, 2022

Some of the responses:

Care to share the data, Darin? I’d love to see it.

Defund public schools, transfer the money to private interests, profit!

I like how easily “school choice” proponents concede to failing schools instead of working to make them better schools.
An F U to the kids that remain at those schools

Fun fact Missouri schools would not be failing if the MO GOP hadn’t been systematically working to defund public education for the last 20+ years.

Dude, you did no research.

Your words do nothing but repeat what the Koch driven school choice people say.

“School Choice” will always be for those that can afford it. Prove me wrong.

You’ve examined the data?

Please share all of it specifically.

Have you really examined the data? If you had, you would see it shows school choice mainly just ends up giving public money to families who are already in private schools. Private schools also don’t do any better academically than public schools when you adjust for income.

If you don’t live in a metropolitan area, where’s the choice?

Wouldn’t be any failing schools if MO would properly fund them.

I see you have the nice Republican/DeVos talking point. Show the data.

Are you for removing tax money from the state to give to private schools that only accept certain students?

That’s how it’s designed to work.

You clearly have NOT examined the data, and I’m skeptical you’ve listened to anyone who opposes the destruction of public education.

Standard conservative policy: starve a public service to the point of failure, point at the system you broke and say “See? It’s broken! Public services don’t work!” then divert the funds to a private model that delivers greater inequality and (bonus!) religious indoctrination.

We have open enrollment available. Also, who will transport students? That costs a lot of money. What about students with disabilities? Private and charter schools don’t have to accept all students. Sit in a classroom all day.

I would also like to see the data. How are we suppose to support an idea or even debate an idea without evidence?

Please share the data. I’ll compare it with the level of funding over the years and see if there’s any correlation. If true, then I would argue that politicians intentionally sabotaged our schools as part of a larger agenda of re-routing public funds to private institutions.

Share the data, please.

We rank 49th in school funding. Can you imagine what we could do if we actually funded our schools and educators?

So shouldn’t the school receive more funding to fix problems rather than abandoning it?

more adequate | fixed it for you

You want tax dollars to go into the pockets of your rich friends that own private schools, just say it out loud already.

Shhhh.

If schools are failing, you’re responsible. The teachers and administrators of any school wants a quality education for all of their students. You have failed to give them the resources to do the job.

There’s that.

“I’ve heard the arguments, and examined the data”, you mean you’ve had your pockets lined? What data are you referring to? FUND PUBLIC SCHOOLS! Missouri is 49th in teacher pay, we have a 6.3 billion dollar surplus. There are NO excuses. FUND OUR PUBLIC SCHOOLS.

“I don’t mind condemning disadvantaged people under the guise of helping the “right” people.” Sure friend, sure.

Exactly this.

Maybe you should try equitably funding school districts instead of using “school choice” as a crutch for failed Republican policies.

Try using your 20 year GOP Supermajority in Missouri to improve public education instead of destroying it.

They have a plan.

It’s kinda hard for public schools to succeed when states continue to underfund schools and underfund teachers but I know that the long game here!!Its amazing old white conservative so called Christians want to take it back to 1830!

The arguments and data that exist only in your head.

So you don’t care if the schools in Rogersville close? With over 2000 kids that would likely devastate the local economy. As long as you get campaign money though, right?

It’s a scam. Attempting to drive public schools into privatization.

Profit!

So you’ll write a law to ensure private schools can not charge any amount beyond what the government will pay? Sounds great!

No profit. Not gonna happen.

You made this up. Research shows that public schools offer the best education, are more transparent to parents and provide a sense of community. You’re a charter shill.

School choice doesn’t fix problems. It does absolutely nothing to address why schools are having problems. Terrible policy for lawmakers to take up.

Nope that means the school gets to choose the students.

If you’re a family of 4 living on $32,000/year living north of Rogersville on hwy B, what choice do you have?

1/ I have heard the arguments & examined the data. I’m convinced its time for the state to average the state & local per pupil spending in the 5 highest performing districts in the state & state fund every public district that same combined amt. Put that $6 billion to good use

Public Schools were setup so all ppl regardless of class can attend What is taught there is to be neutral as possible We pay taxes for the whole of society just like infrastructure
If you want something else you pay for it out of pocket This should be the end of that conversation

Curious as to how much in campaign contributions Herzog donated to you?

They didn’t have to, he ran unopposed:

Election Results
Official Election Returns
State of Missouri – General Election, November 08, 2022, Tuesday, November 8, 2022
As announced by the Board of State Canvassers on Friday, December 9, 2022

State Representative – District 137 (15 of 15 Precincts Reported)

Darin Chappell Republican 13,708 100.0%
Total Votes 13,708

Also, as a “Conservative Constitutionalist,” what are your feelings on the 3/5 Compromise? Time to bring it back, or does your constitutionalist conservatism only go so far? On that tip: Care to *define* “conservative constitutionalism?” Can you do so using specifics?

Have you considered… I don’t know… funding schools? Like where were you educated?

Heh. Because I are an education expert

So your solution, instead of improving schools, is to take away money from “bad” schools, which are “bad” because they’re already underfunded. For example Kirkwood has the “best” school. Average home value is over 400k. Ranked 100th is aurora R8 where the values are under 200k

So we should follow along cause another MoGOPer says they examined the data? Was the data the amount private companies will make per pupil?

Profit!

Invest in schools, it is the most efficient and effective way to save and improve public education. Choice takes resources away from many to help a few. Robbing from the needy to help the rich. #SchoolChoice is a failed program.

So the GOP approach to “starve the beast and it will die” approach to eliminate public schools is working it seems.

That’s their plan.

Twenty years of GOP budget cuts on the necks of our kids is the origin. Let’s equalize school fu[n]ding across zip codes then and allow local schools to compete. But then again, that’s not your intent, is it?

Since ‘choice’ is the key word…they will ‘select’ only the best which allows them to look successful…behavior, slower learners, special education students will be not be selected.
The actual purpose is to fund parents that select private and religious schools!

That’s their plan.

What data did you examine? Care to share? Also, what choices do sparsely populated areas have?

So quick question, when parents opt out and go to a “choice” school. Is a bus provided? Before care/ after care? Do you know who will be left behind? Those without the means to get to the “choice” schools.

Profit!

The data shows that more school funding (and family affluence) contributes to better educational achievement. The answer is to assure ALL schools are adequately funded.

Wow. No hope from you for improving public education in underserved areas? No wonder Missouri has a reputation of being a backwater hell hole. Lazy representatives.

“School Choice” is the “Right to Work” of the “Contract With America” #MObullshit

Bingo!

What a bunch of BS! No taxpayer money should be used for private schools. That is just another means of segregation! Public schools would be better funded if they were a priority, but you only want to educate those that a few legislators think are worthy instead of everyone.

You’re an idiot if you think this gaslighting works!

Please cite the “data”. Otherwise your comments are just more moronic drivel. Your opinions are NOT facts.

The GOP’s CRT

27 Saturday Aug 2022

Posted by penroseonpolitics in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

critical race theory, CRT, education, Teacher Cartoon, teacher shortage

HB 1634: forbidden fruit

05 Sunday Dec 2021

Posted by Michael Bersin in Missouri General Assembly, Missouri House

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

1619 Project, Brian Seitz, censorship, critical race theory, curricular micromanagement, education, fascists, fear, gaslighting, higher education, Howard Zinn, missouri, right wingnut, right wingnuts

Apparently books with ‘things’ in them and any discussion thereof are really scary.

“…to ensure that the intellectual vitality of students and faculty is not infringed, the general assembly hereby enacts the following reform for history curricula used in schools and institutions of higher education in this state…”

Stack ’em and burn ’em. That’s next.

Bill prefiling for the Missouri General Assembly session started on December 1st.

Yet another bill, addressing a matter of great urgency for right wingnuts:

HB 1634
Prohibits the use of any curriculum implementing critical race theory in the public schools and institutions of higher education of the state.
Sponsor: Seitz, Brian (156)
Proposed Effective Date: 8/28/2022
LR Number: 3667H.01I
Last Action: 12/01/2021 – Prefiled (H)
Bill String: HB 1634
Next House Hearing: Hearing not scheduled
Calendar: Bill currently not on a House calendar

The bill language:

SECOND REGULAR SESSION
HOUSE BILL NO. 1634
101ST GENERAL ASSEMBLY

INTRODUCED BY REPRESENTATIVE SEITZ.
3667H.01I DANA RADEMAN MILLER, Chief Clerk

AN ACT

To amend chapter 170, RSMo, by adding thereto one new section relating to curricula
implementing critical race theory.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the state of Missouri, as follows:
Section A. Chapter 170, RSMo, is amended by adding thereto one new section, to be known as section 170.353, to read as follows:

170.353. 1. In accordance with Article IX, Section 1(a) of the Missouri Constitution, which states that “A general diffusion of knowledge and intelligence being essential to the preservation of the rights and liberties of the people”, and to ensure that the intellectual vitality of students and faculty is not infringed, the general assembly hereby enacts the following reform for history curricula used in schools and institutions of higher education in this state.
2. As used in this section, “curriculum implementing critical race theory” includes, but is not limited to, any curriculum that:
(1) Identifies people or groups of people, entities, or institutions in the United States as inherently, immutably, or systemically sexist, racist, anti-LGBT, bigoted, biased, privileged, or oppressed; and
(2) Employs immutable, inherited, or typically continuing characteristics such as race, income, appearance, religion, ancestry, sexual orientation, or gender identity to:
(a) Perpetuate stereotypes; and
(b) Assign blame for societal problems or ills to categories of living persons based on any such stereotypes or characteristics; or
(3) Classifies persons into groups for the purpose of targeting only certain groups for education, formation, indoctrination, or viewpoint transformation, other than separation of students by biological sex where appropriate and conducive for state20 mandated sex education instruction.
3. For purposes of this section, curriculum implementing critical race theory includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(1) The 1619 Project initiative of the New York Times;
(2) The Learning for Justice Curriculum of the Southern Poverty Law Center;
(3) We Stories;
(4) Programs of:
(a) Educational Equity Consultants;
(b) BLM at School;
(c) Teaching for Change; or
(d) The Zinn Education Project; or
(5) Any other similar predecessor or successor curriculum.
4. No state department, school district, charter school, online instruction funded in any manner by the general assembly, or personnel or agent of such state department, school district, charter school, or online instruction shall teach, use, or provide for use by any pupil any curriculum, instructional material, or assignment designed to teach components of critical race theory as part of any curriculum, course syllabus, or instruction in any course or program of study.
5. (1) If the state board of education determines that a publicly funded local education agency or online program of instruction has violated this section, the board shall notify the entity of its violation.
(2) If such entity fails to comply with this section within thirty days of such notification, the state board of education shall direct the department of elementary and secondary education to withhold a maximum of ten percent of the monthly distribution of state formula funding to such entity. After the board determines that such entity is in compliance with this section, the department shall restore the distribution of the funding to its original amount before the percentage of the distribution was withheld.
6. (1) If the attorney general determines that a two-year or four-year institution of higher education that receives state moneys has violated this section, the attorney general shall notify the institution of its violation.
(2) If such institution fails to comply with this section within thirty days of such notification, the attorney general may direct the department of higher education and workforce development to withhold a maximum of ten percent of the distribution of state funding to such institution. After the attorney general determines that such institution is in compliance with this section, the attorney general shall notify the department to restore the distribution of state funding for the institution to its original amount before the reduction was made if any such funding was withheld.
7. This section shall not be construed to:
(1) Inhibit or violate the First Amendment rights of students or faculty;
(2) Undermine the duty of a public institution of higher education to protect intellectual freedom and free expression to the fullest degree; or
(3) Prevent a public institution of higher education from promoting racial, cultural, ethnic, intellectual, or academic diversity or inclusiveness, provided such efforts are consistent with the provisions of this section.

“…This section shall not be construed to…Inhibit or violate the First Amendment rights of students or faculty; Undermine the duty of a public institution of higher education to protect intellectual freedom and free expression to the fullest degree; or Prevent a public institution of higher education from promoting racial, cultural, ethnic, intellectual, or academic diversity or inclusiveness, provided such efforts are consistent with the provisions of this section…”

It does just that:

“…No state department, school district, charter school, online instruction funded in any manner by the general assembly, or personnel or agent of such state department, school district, charter school, or online instruction shall teach, use, or provide for use by any pupil any curriculum, instructional material, or assignment designed to teach components of critical race theory as part of any curriculum, course syllabus, or instruction in any course or program of study…”

What, we’re all stupid?

“…If such institution fails to comply with this section within thirty days of such notification, the attorney general may direct the department of higher education and workforce development to withhold a maximum of ten percent of the distribution of state funding to such institution…”

Must have left out the part about reeducation camps. That’ll get fixed with an amendment.

← Older posts

Recent Posts

  • Election Day – Turnout – Vote
  • Election Day – Vote
  • Taigan Plummer (D): Open Town Hall in Warrensburg – November 2, 2026
  • Thanks for nothing, Brandon Phelps (r)….
  • Campaign Finance: make it so

Recent Comments

Election Day –… on Election Day – Vote
Taigan Plummer (D):… on Taigan Plummer (D) in the 54th…
Thanks for nothing,… on Brandon Phelps (r): we get a s…
Wasting all that mon… on Campaign Finance: no quarter
Wasting all that mon… on Campaign Finance: Next

Archives

  • November 2026
  • October 2026
  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,098,729 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...