Yesterday at the Missouri Ethics Commission:
C000953 10/07/2016 MO REPUBLICAN PARTY Rex Sinquefield 244 Bent Walnut Lane Westphalia MO 65085 None Retired 10/7/2016 $250,000.00
[emphasis added]
They’ll have all the money they need. And then some.
08 Saturday Oct 2016
Posted in campaign finance
Yesterday at the Missouri Ethics Commission:
C000953 10/07/2016 MO REPUBLICAN PARTY Rex Sinquefield 244 Bent Walnut Lane Westphalia MO 65085 None Retired 10/7/2016 $250,000.00
[emphasis added]
They’ll have all the money they need. And then some.
08 Saturday Oct 2016
Posted in social media
Donald Trump (r) stepped on his…ego, again. As if anyone should be surprised. You’d think the family values exposed in the audio recording would elicit a strong response in certain quarters.
Via Twitter, from Senator Roy Blunt’s (r) campaign:
RoyBluntMO @RoyBluntMO
Donald Trump’s statements were disrespectful and inappropriate, and he was right to apologize.
11:20 PM – 7 Oct 2016
In January a much more extensive sternly worded letter to Donald Trump’s publicist will follow under separate cover.
Apparently Roy Blunt’s campaign believes it took a monumental act of courage on the part of Donald Trump to go against the sea of voices calling for him to not apologize. Seriously?
That mush supposedly didn’t come from Roy Blunt (r):
RoyBluntMO @RoyBluntMO
I’m running for Senate to deliver real results for the people of Missouri. All tweets are from the campaign unless signed -RB.
Now that’s a real profile in courage.
07 Friday Oct 2016
Posted in Uncategorized
Tags
U.S. Senate candidate Jason Kander (D) was in Warrensburg this afternoon for a round table discussion with area veterans and family members. After the event he spoke with the media who were present, including the Kansas City Star, the Associated Press, and us.
The transcript:
Question: [on attack ads]
Jason Kander (D): Well, they’re not accurate. Senator Blunt’s entire approach here is to pretend that I have served in Congress….I think it’s pretty telling that after twenty years in Washington Senator Blunt has a campaign that’s about me. He doesn’t have accomplishments of his own to point to that would take up, you know, I mean, what, six of out his seven ads are about me? So, I just think that says a lot. And that maybe he recognizes that people are not satisfied with what he’s done in Washington so he just spends his time distorting my record and smearing who I am.
Question: You trying to distance yourself at all from Hillary Clinton?….Can you talk about how you feel voters should judge you in relation to the top of the ticket?
Jason Kander (D): Well, I think that in Missouri it’s pretty clear that what people do here is they judge candidates individually. That’s just what happens in Missouri. I mean, we’ve seen that, seen that in every election. I mean, the President lost by ten points in twenty-twelve on the same day that I won a statewide race. And that’s just, that’s just how Missourians vote the elections. They go down the ballot and they make choices. Uh, I, uh, have made it pretty clear in this race that the reason that I’m running is because Washington’s broken and we’re not gonna change Washington until we change the people we send there. And if you look, my message has not changed since day one. We announced this campaign on February nineteenth of twenty-fifteen before, I think, either of the two folks running for president were even running. And my message hasn’t changed from day one. And the reason that we’re in the lead right now is because over the course of time we’ve talked to enough people and our message has resonated.
Question: [crosstalk] Did you vote in the primary? Did you vote for Hillary Clinton?
Jason Kander (D): [without hesitation] Uh, yeah.
Question: [crosstalk] Um, but you haven’t talked a little, uh, much about Donald Trump’s relation to Roy Blunt. Is that a, uh, conscious decision? What, what do you think the voters should decide between Trump and Blunt, whether they’re connected?
Jason Kander (D): I think I’ve been pretty candid about the fact that Donald Trump’s not qualified to be president. And at the same time I’ve also pointed out that Donald Trump’s entire message is that people like Senator Blunt are the problem. So, you know, there’s a reason that, that folks are, I understand, I really do. I, I don’t think that Donald Trump’s qualified to be president and at the same time I understand why, at a time when the gridlock in Congress is now being reflected by gridlock in our national conversation, uh, that people are willing to consider somebody, uh, who represents to them changing the conversation and shaking things up, even, even though, in my opinion, that person shouldn’t be president and isn’t qualified for the job.
Question: Do you imagine picking up that sort of comparison and contrast with Trump and Blunt going forward? Or, or is this something, again, you want people to decide on either party?
Jason Kander (D): I, I know that Missourians are gonna base their choice for each, each office based on the candidates. That’s what they always do. And not based on candidates in other races. Senator Blunt knows that, too. And, uh, and so I guess for me it’s just pretty apparent. I mean, we, we’ve had events where, uh, folks, you come out of rally and there’s Trump supporters and Clinton supporters loudly arguing with one another, but they both just walked out of our rally. So, that’s I guess why we feel so confident that it’s really not about being one party or another. It’s, this campaign is about a new generation of leadership and that’s what people are looking for.
Question: How much pushback do you expect given the fact that, you know, a month ago this race really wasn’t where it is today? We have another month to go and Republicans are dumping huge amounts of money into this race. [crosstalk] Huge. [laughter] Large, okay. Huge. [crosstalk] Uh, it’s a commonly used word. [laughter] I mean, you know, we’re basically starting even now with a month to go. How, how nasty do you expect it to get?
Jason Kander (D): I’ll just say this – that, we’ve known from the beginning that for twenty years special interests have been making some pretty big investments in Senator Blunt and those investments have been paying off for them. He does whatever they tell him to do. He wakes up every morning in Washington thinking about what he can do for the special interests that are funding his campaign and his lifestyle. I’ve known from the moment that I announced that I was getting into this race that those special interests where gonna do anything they possibly could to make sure they continue to get a return on that investment they’ve made in Senator Blunt. And the problem that Senator Blunt has is Missourians know that, too. And that’s why we’re so confident and that’s why we have all the momentum in this race. And we have a great grassroots broad based level of support. One report said that ninety-four percent of the folks who have given to this campaign have given a hundred dollars or less. I read somewhere that that number for Senator Blunt is two percent. So, we’re real confident about where we are and I’m sure that they’re gonna do everything they can to try and save the investment they’ve literally made in Senator Blunt. But I know we’re gonna win.
Question: You imagine, you think there’s gonna be a lot of money coming in at the end…? I mean, you know, there’s some, Pennsylvania’s sixty, seventy million bucks and you’re not gonna get that kind of money in Missouri, but there’s gonna be a lot of money here in the end.
Jason Kander (D):: Missouri is a state where…
Question: Koch brothers. You worried about the Koch brothers coming in? AFP? Any of the… [crosstalk] Club for Growth?
Jason Kander (D): I think they’re pretty worried about me. I don’t spend a lot of time thinking about them. I, I, I’ll just tell you this. Missouri is a state where when you have the resources to compete and get your message out then you have as good a shot as anybody else. And we’ve had success with the broad based grassroots campaign. We, we have the resources that we need to get our message out. Uh, and that’s what it’s gonna take to win, so.
Question: Are you concerned about the debate discussion, which apparently he doesn’t want to debate, that’s the allegation you guys have made.
Jason Kander (D): I think we owe it to Missourians to have more debates. We had one. Apparently he didn’t have a very good time. I thought it was really good for the state and I enjoyed it. Uh, I hope that he agrees to more. We’ve already accepted invitations for three more. You know, initially we said there should be ten. There’s nine media markets, let’s have a televised one in every media market. Uh, it’s unfortunate that after twenty years in Washington Senator Blunt doesn’t want to stand on a stage and defend his record.
Campaign staff: Thank you.
Voices: Thank you.
07 Friday Oct 2016
Posted in Uncategorized
Tags
2016 election, Citizens United, Clean Power Plan, EPA, federal regulation, Josh Hawley, missouri, RAGA
I don’t have cable and watch very little broadcast TV so my knowledge about the political ads Missouri pols are airing is relatively limited. Which is probably why I was gobsmacked the other night when I saw a TV ad for Josh Hawley, the Republican running for Attorney General. I learned from that ad that Mr. Hawley is promising to tirelessly fight the federal government. And here was me who didn’t even know we were at war with the Feds!
When you look a little closer it seems that Hawley, a professor of constitutional law, really wants to go to the mat over what he and like-minded conservatives term “federal overreach” – the kind of overreach that got insurance for 10,000 Americans who didn’t previously have it, or the kind that at least tries to keep our food and drugs from killing us and to keep our air and water unpolluted. This type of overreach is manifested through laws and regulations, and although they emanate from democratically elected bodies or their proxies in government agencies, they seem to have excessively inflamed Hawley’s anti-government sympathies.
Among the regulations that Hawley wants to wrestle down is the EPA’s Clean Power Plan. These new regulations are not just essential to slow down global warming and halt climate change, but to the thousands of Missourians who experience adverse health effects due to toxic air pollution. In 2012 the NRDC ranked Missouri the 15th worst state when it comes to toxic air pollution from coal-fired power plants. Such high levels of pollution can cause serious conditions like lung cancer, emphysema, asthma, and heart attacks, resulting in hospitalization, and even premature death.
For obvious reasons, entities like Koch Industries, Murray Energy, the American Petroleum Institute, Exxon Mobil, the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity are also embroiled in the war on regulation and, in particular, the EPA’s new rules. The fossil fuel industries along with some utilities have got lots to loose if the rules are implemented. That’s why they give big bucks to organizations like the Republican Attorneys General Association (RAGA) in order to finance the campaigns of regulatory foes like Hawley. The RAGA, true to its contributors’ mission, passed along a little over $3 million dollars to put Hawley in the Missouri AG’s office.
Which brings us to another anti-regulation group that really likes Josh Hawley: Citizens United. That’s right, the same Citizen United behind the Supreme Court ruling that put government up for sale to the highest bidder has enthusiastically endorsed Hawley whose opposition to government regulations when it comes to free speech emanating from the pocketbook is very convenient for billionaires with a political agenda. Nor has Hawley waited to be elected AG to test the ethical waters swirling around campaign finance. In regard to the RAGA campaign contribution:
A St. Louis alderman is accusing Republican Josh Hawley, a law professor running to become Missouri’s next attorney general, of attempting to conceal the source of nearly $3.1 million in campaign contributions.
In a complaint filed with the Missouri Ethics Commission, Alderman Scott Ogilvie wants regulators to investigate whether Hawley’s campaign violated state campaign laws by accepting money from the Washington DC-based Republican Attorneys General Association that was funneled to Hawley through a separate state-level political action committee.
Ogilvie is also worried that RAGA failed to register in Missouri as an out-of-state political committee, which would be “required to file with the state and disclose contributions from its individual donors meant to benefit Hawley.”
I’m aware that the Democratic gubernatorial candidate, current Attorney General Chris Koster, has joined the lawsuit some states have filed against the new EPA rules and has blathered about federal overreach. What can I say? The ostensibly Democratic Koster is a politician in pink verging on red Missouri and he, like Democratic Senator Claire McCaskill, believes he has to play politics on the margin, borrowing political capital from old-timey Republicans. What he is not, however, is a holy warrior charging full-tilt into anti-regulatory territory, a place Hawley calls home sweet home. Nor, in spite of his ample campaign kitty, does Koster endorse the Citizens United ruling.
It can’t fail to strike at least a few voters that the questionable views of “constitutional” foes of so-called government of overreach, such as Hawley, are usually very compatible with the interests of the guys that hand out unregulated money. In the case of the EPA’s Clean Power Plan, for example, Hawley seems more than willing to allow the Koch brothers to use their shouting greenbacks to drown out everybody else’s free speech. I don’t know about you, but I don’t want to hand the State’s legal reins over to a guy who interprets the Constitution in a way that delivers government into the hands of billionaires.
06 Thursday Oct 2016
Posted in campaign finance
Not transparent, nor grass rootsie. Not in the least.
Today at the Missouri Ethics Commission for Eric Greitens’ (r) 2016 gubernatorial campaign:
C151053 10/06/2016 GREITENS FOR MISSOURI Republican Governors Association – Missouri 1747 Penn. Ave. NW Suite 250 Washington DC 20006 10/6/2016 $1,000,000.00
[emphasis added]
It’s obscene.
Previously:
Campaign Finance: Oh, like they couldn’t come up with another $25,000.00? (July 18, 2016)
Campaign Finance: not exactly a paragon of transparency (August 11, 2016)
Campaign Finance: just passing through (August 26, 2016)
Campaign Finance: Who’s that for? (September 17, 2016)
Campaign Finance: Oh, like anyone is surprised? (September 19, 2016)
Campaign Finance: maybe it all depends on what your definition of “grassroots” is (September 30, 2016)
Campaign Finance: let’s go for the record (Oct0ber 4, 2016)
06 Thursday Oct 2016
Posted in Uncategorized
“…Josh Hawley has never represented a client in the Platte County courthouse or, for that matter, in any Missouri county courthouse…”
Josh Hawley’s (r) 2016 campaign for Attorney General is running a slickly produced television ad. Teresa Hensley’s (D) campaign pointed out the artifice in a press release:
JOSH HAWLEY: MISSOURI’S BAD POLITICAL ACTOR
Hawley pretends to go into a courthouse in first political ad.
PLATTE COUNTY, MO – In his first general election political commercial, Josh Hawley did something he’s never done before: stride towards the Platte County courthouse to practice law and maybe even try a case. The truth is, Josh Hawley has never represented a client in the Platte County courthouse or, for that matter, in any Missouri county courthouse. He does not take or try cases in Missouri.Teresa Hensley for Attorney General also released her first commercial this week, largely filmed inside the Historic Cass County Courthouse where she practiced law as a private attorney for 14 years. Hensley then served as County Prosecutor for 10 years, representing her constituents in a court of law, putting hundreds of felons behind bars, winning convictions for over 500 sexual assault, domestic violence, and child abuse cases, and an unmatched 21 for 21 murder convictions.
“Missouri has enough bad political actors,” said Hensley spokesperson David Woodruff. “Josh Hawley has never prosecuted a single criminal or sought justice for a single victim in a Missouri courtroom. Missouri voters will not be fooled by Josh Hawley’s phony effort and lack of experience. The Attorney General’s office is not a think tank or a political stepping stone. It’s a law office for the people of Missouri.”
###
Okay, that left a mark.
Previously:
Teresa Hensley (D) for Attorney General: first general election ad (October 3, 2016)
05 Wednesday Oct 2016
Posted in media criticism, social media
Yesterday, via Twitter, from a Faux News Channel talking head:
Monica Crowley @MonicaCrowley
At the Berlin Wall last week. Walls work.
[….]
9:38 AM – 5 Oct 2015
Some of the responses:
“…Funny, you know, because I was just thinking we need to be more like the Soviets…”
“…So lemme see if I’ve got this straight: Fox News persona backs Trump by posing with one of human history’s greatest symbols of oppression…”
05 Wednesday Oct 2016
Posted in media criticism, social media
There was a debate last night between Tim Kaine (D) and Mike Pence (r), the candidates for Vice President.
It’s beyond ironic in our post truth society, even with instant access to technology which allows us all to easily verify almost everything, that the denial of facts and, you know, what is the actual reality merits style points from self appointed media gatekeepers if delivered in a sufficiently deferential and plastic manner. This same world view considers it extremely rude to point this out.
Someone on Twitter understands that:
Dave Scott @DaveScottSC
“Sure Trump’s a dangerous racist, less qualified to be president than any nominee who’s ever run, & Pence lied a lot. But Kaine interrupted”
5:54 AM – 5 Oct 2016
From Hillary Clinton’s (D) campaign:
Hillary Clinton @HillaryClinton
At the #VPDebate, Mike Pence tried really, really hard to deny pretty much everything Donald Trump has said and done. Let’s replay the tape:
[….]
7:29 AM – 5 Oct 2016
04 Tuesday Oct 2016
Posted in Uncategorized
“…It is time for your candidate to live up to the standards of transparency he places upon everyone else.”
Chris Koster’s (D) 2016 gubernatorial campaign sent the following letter to Eric Greitens’ (r) campaign:
October 4, 2016
Austin Chambers
Campaign Manager
Eric Greitens for Governor
By Email
Re: Release of Financial DisclosuresDear Mr. Chambers:
Last Thursday, the Koster for Missouri campaign released copies of Chris Koster’s 2012 through 2015 personal U.S. federal and Missouri state tax returns, including the supporting worksheets and forms documenting all sources of income, covering the previous 4 years. With these disclosures, and in combination with the Missouri Ethics Commission filings, the voters of Missouri now have a clear and complete understanding of the amount and source of all personal earnings and campaign contributions received by Attorney General Koster.
For some time, Mr. Greitens has promised to release his own returns and disclosures only after Attorney General Koster himself did so. Yet despite that promise, your campaign now gives an array of excuses as to why you have not, and may not, release Mr. Greitens’ tax returns. This is pertinent information necessary for Missouri’s voters to assess what conflicts or contradictions exist between Mr. Greitens’ actual financial activity and his obligations should he be elected to serve as Governor.
Plainly put, just as your campaign has previously hidden the identities of multi-million dollar campaign contributors and supporters within the so-called “SEALs for Truth” and LG PAC committees, you are again keeping the voters of Missouri in the dark regarding the amounts and sources of money provided to Mr. Greitens during the last four years. This is unacceptable.
We call on you to release — by 5:00 pm Thursday, October 6th — Mr. Greitens’ detailed personal 2012 – 2015 federal and state tax returns, as well as those returns for Eric Greitens, LLC, including the supporting worksheets and forms documenting all sources of income for each return. These forms would include, but not be limited to, K-1s, W-2s, and 1099s, as were included in Attorney General Koster’s disclosure. Only with such candid disclosure is it possible for Mr. Greitens to provide the voters an equivalent assurance, as has Attorney General Koster, that no conflict or inconsistency exists between Mr. Greitens’ actual financial history, his campaign’s rhetoric, and his suitability to act as Governor.
Please consider the complete disclosures described above as an absolute condition in order for our campaign to continue negotiating with yours regarding the terms and details of the contemplated October 14th gubernatorial debate.
Your campaign and Mr. Greitens have repeatedly accused your opponents of financial conflicts, improper tax behavior, and lying. It is time for your candidate to live up to the standards of transparency he places upon everyone else.
Sincerely,
s/
Andrew P. Whalen
Koster for Missouri
What would the Donald do? Just asking.
“…Please consider the complete disclosures described above as an absolute condition in order for our campaign to continue negotiating with yours regarding the terms and details of the contemplated October 14th gubernatorial debate…”
That doesn’t strike us as bluffing.
04 Tuesday Oct 2016
Posted in campaign finance
There could be so many.
Yesterday at the Missouri Ethics Commission for Eric Greitens’ (r) 2016 gubernatorial campaign:
C151053 10/03/2016 GREITENS FOR MISSOURI John Tracy 12326 Wedgeton Lane Des Peres MO 63131 Dot Foods Inc Business 10/3/2016 $5,001.00
C151053 10/03/2016 GREITENS FOR MISSOURI Debbie Williams 106 Norwood Dr. Branson MO 65616 Retired Retired 10/3/2016
$5,001.00
[emphasis added]
Those are just like campaign contributions, only smaller.
C151053 10/03/2016 GREITENS FOR MISSOURI John Miller 299 S. Main Suite 2450 Salt Lake City UT 84111 JR Miller Enterprises Executive 10/3/2016 $25,000.00
[emphasis added]
Apparently they don’t have a gubernatorial race in Utah this cycle.
C151053 10/03/2016 GREITENS FOR MISSOURI Talya Nevo-Hacohen 616 Seaward Rd. Corona Del Mar CA 92625 Sabra Healthcare REIT Executive 10/3/2016 $10,000.00
[emphasis added]
Nor in California.
Most $5,001.00 contributions to a gubernatorial candidate, largest single contribution to a gubernatorial candidate, most out of state money to a gubernatorial candidate…
Previously:
Campaign Finance: Oh, like they couldn’t come up with another $25,000.00? (July 18, 2016)
Campaign Finance: not exactly a paragon of transparency (August 11, 2016)
Campaign Finance: just passing through (August 26, 2016)
Campaign Finance: Who’s that for? (September 17, 2016)
Campaign Finance: Oh, like anyone is surprised? (September 19, 2016)
Campaign Finance: maybe it all depends on what your definition of “grassroots” is (September 30, 2016)