• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Monthly Archives: August 2015

Campaign Finance: having a bit of name recognition frees you up to spend money on something else

19 Wednesday Aug 2015

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

2016, campaign finance, governor, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, Peter Kinder

Like, maybe, social media?

Today at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C091145 08/18/2015 FRIENDS OF PETER KINDER Randy Brown 16651 Hwy. V Diamond MO 64840 Retired 8/17/2015 $10,000.00

[emphasis added]

Previously:

Campaign Finance: Peter who? (May 6, 2015)

Campaign Finance: What’s up with that? (May 29, 2015)

Campaign Finance: running for Governor, may run for Governor, exploring a run for Governor (June 13, 2015)

Campaign Finance: running for Governor, may run for Governor, probably running for Governor (June 25, 2015)

Campaign Finance: in the past this might have been impressive (July 1, 2015)

Campaign Finance: wild card (July 6, 2015)

Peter Kinder (r) announces for the 2016 gubernatorial race (July 12, 2015)

Peter Kinder (r) – July 2015 Campaign Finance Report (July 17, 2015)

Campaign Finance: If this keeps up… (July 28, 2015)

PPP Missouri Poll: 2016 U.S. Senate and Governor – August 11, 2015 (August 11, 2015)

Clueless

19 Wednesday Aug 2015

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Claire McCaskill, dress code, General Assembly, harassment, interns, missouri, social media, Twitter

One of the proposed “solutions” to the harassment of legislative interns in Jefferson City received significant derision today.

A letter from Senator Claire McCaskill (D):

United States Senate

[….]

August 18, 2015

Representative Nick King

District 17, Missouri General Assembly

Missouri House of Representatives

201 West Capitol Avenue

Room 201-CA

Jefferson City, MO 65101

Dear Representative King:

Victim-blaming in the context of sexual violence is as old as the crime itself. I saw victims blamed for the crimes against them as a courtroom prosecutor of sex crimes, and as elected prosecutor for Jackson County.

I saw young women held responsible for the harm done to them by others. I even saw a few law enforcement officials sometimes unwilling to pursue justice because of the victim’s behavior prior to the crime. “She was asking for it,” is a sentence I have longed to see stripped from our cultural vocabulary.

Victim-blaming obscures justice, and undermines a process that should be based solely on factual evidence, not on a desire to skirt accountability.

And so I was bitterly disappointed to read press accounts of your suggestion that, as policies are developed to better protect interns working in the Missouri State Legislature from sexual harassment and assault, you thought an intern dress code was the answer.

Such a recommendation reeks of a desire to avoid holding fully accountable those who would prey upon young women and men seeking to begin honorable careers in public service. Is your recommendation meant to suggest that the ability of adult men and women who have been elected to govern the state of Missouri to control themselves is contingent on the attire of the teenagers and young adults working in their offices? is your recommendation meant to suggest that if an intern wears suggestive clothing, she or he will share partial responsibility for any potential sexual harassment or assault?

I approach this issue as a former prosecutor of sex crimes, a U.S. senator who is working to curb sexual violence on a national scale, and as a mother and grandmother. I also approach it as a former Missouri state legislator – and previous to that, a former intern in the Missouri State legislature who confronted sexual harassment from male legislators.

As I have said of those times, I am not sure that I handled the harassment correctly. I believe younger generations of women and men are growing stronger in the face of such unacceptable behavior – including recent interns working in the State legislature who have spoken out and held powerful legislators to account.

I am immeasurably proud of these young women. And I refuse to stand by idly while any suggestion is made that victims of sexual harassment in the Missouri State Legislature is the responsibility of anyone other than the legislators themselves. It is the responsibility of you and your colleagues to uphold the law, protect young people working in our state’s capital, and confront and change a culture that excuses sexual violence. This problem has nothing to do with how interns are dressed.

I ask that you clarify or withdraw your suggestion of a dress code for interns as a means of combatting sexual harassment – and that you redouble your efforts to confront the real and systemic causes of such behavior.

Sincerely,

s/

Claire McCaskill

United States Senator

And via Twitter:

Eli Yokley ‏@eyokley

One of the remedies #MOLeg-ers suggested in response to sexual harassment of interns? A dress code. For the interns. [….] 9:01 AM – 18 Aug 2015

Eli Yokley ‏@eyokley

the notion that a dress code might combat sexual harassment by grown adults at the #MOLeg says a lot more about them than the young interns. 9:36 AM – 18 Aug 2015

Jason Rosenbaum ‏@jrosenbaum

. @Rep_TRichardson puts kibosh on intern dress code as backlash intensifies [….] 4:43 PM – 18 Aug 2015

Sarah Felts ‏@sarahfelts

I was in an A-line pleated knee-length skirt & an Oxford buttoned up to the collar bone. It’s not about clothes. #MoLeg #MoLegDressCode 5:13 PM – 18 Aug 2015

Yael T. Abouhalkah ‏@YaelTAbouhalkah

Good news: Missouri House speaker won’t support idiotic dress code change for interns [….] 5:31 PM – 18 Aug 2015

Emily Abouhalkah ‏@emilyabouhalkah

Things that cause sexual harassment: 1) sexual harassers 2) placid acceptance of the above #MOLEG 10:34 AM – 18 Aug 2015

Tom Riley ‏@ThomasKRiley

Remember that this #moleg that can’t trust itself with distractions of a short dress thinks it’s fine with unlimited campaign contributions 6:46 PM – 18 Aug 2015

That’s just a sampling.

Previously:

Ruh, roh… (May 13, 2015)

What? We’re all what? May 13, 2014)

A big Diehl in Jefferson City (May 14, 2015)

No Diehl in Jefferson City (May 14, 2015)

A new leaf? (May 15, 2015)

Uh, oh… (July 23, 2015)

Sen. Paul LeVota (D) resigns (July 24, 2015)

Campaign Finance: Ah, Springfield

17 Monday Aug 2015

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

2016, campaign finance, Eric Greitens, governor, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission

Today at the Missouri Ethics Commission for Eric Greitens’ (r) 2016 exploratory gubernatorial campaign:

C151053 08/17/2015 GREITENS FOR MISSOURI John Ghirardelli 4359 E Bogey Ct Springfield MO 65809 Self Professional Manager 8/17/2015 $5,001.00

[emphasis added]

It’s been a couple of weeks, but then again, it’s the August doldrums…

Previously:

Campaign Finance: There is another? (February 25, 2015)

Campaign Finance: a little bit more (February 26, 2015)

Campaign Finance: A new bandwagon? (March 6, 2015)

Campaign Finance: but wait, there’s more (March 10, 2015)

Campaign Finance: that’ll help finance a whole lot of exploring (March 12, 2015)

Campaign Finance: it’s going to be a good quarter (March 16, 2015)

Campaign Finance: still exploring (March 17, 2015)

Campaign Finance: gone quiet (March 21, 2015)

Campaign Finance: not quiet at all (March 25, 2015)

Campaign Finance: eat mor chikin (March 26, 2015)

The stenographer: Ah, for the good old days… (March 28, 2015)

Campaign Finance: in under the wire (April 1, 2015)

Campaign Finance: all in today (April 9, 2015)

Campaign Finance: far afield (April 13, 2015)

Eric Greitens (r) – quarterly campaign finance report – April 15, 2015 (April 18, 2015)

Campaign Finance: not to be outdone (April 21, 2015)

Campaign Finance: not exactly spare change (April 23, 2015)

Campaign Finance: also in increments of $5,001.00 (April 23, 2015)

Campaign Finance: That’s Entertainment! (April 27, 2015)

Campaign Finance: still more (May 2, 2015)

Campaign Finance: just another harbinger of a populist awakening in Missouri (May 5, 2015)

Campaign Finance: You were expecting anything less? (May 19, 2015)

Campaign Finance: still exploring (June 6, 2015)

Campaign Finance: running for Governor, may run for Governor, exploring a run for Governor (June 13, 2015)

Campaign Finance: alrighty then (June 16, 2015)

Campaign Finance: we’d venture to say that’s a lot of capital (June 23, 2015)

Campaign Finance: pretty soon you’re talkin’ serious money (June 24, 2015)

Campaign Finance: you don’t need to play chess when you have friends like this (June 25, 2015)

Campaign Finance: fast approaching that first million (June 26, 2015)

Campaign Finance: getting closer… (June 26, 2015)

Campaign Finance: ever so close… (June 29, 2015)

Campaign Finance: blow right by it (June 30, 2015)

Campaign Finance: there is no end to it (July 1, 2015)

Campaign Finance: also inexorable (July 11, 2015)

Campaign Finance: a talent for raising money (July 13, 2015)

Eric Greitens (r) – July 2015 Quarterly Campaign Finance Report (July 15, 2015)

Campaign Finance: it’s getting boring… (July 20, 2015)

Campaign Finance: Who’s buying the beer? (July 24, 2015)

Campaign Finance: branching out (July 29, 2015)

Campaign Finance: Is this a trend? (July 31, 2015)

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): on the Iran nuclear deal – Harrisonville, MO – August 14, 2015

15 Saturday Aug 2015

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

4th Congressional District, Harrisonville, Iran, Jim White, missouri, nuclear deal, town hall, Vicky Hartzler

From the White House:

[….]

This deal ensures IAEA access when needed, where needed to verify the peaceful nature of Iran’s nuclear program. “Anytime, anywhere” inspections are simply unnecessary thanks to the deal.

Under this deal, Iran will allow robust monitoring of all its nuclear facilities. IAEA inspectors have the right to a physical or technical presence in all of Iran’s nuclear sites and will conduct regular monitoring of Iran’s entire nuclear fuel cycle and supply chain, from uranium mines and mills to centrifuge production, assembly, and storage facilities. This means Iran would need to set up an entirely parallel set of facilities and a separate supply chain if it sought to have a covert nuclear weapons program. This kind of program would be extremely difficult to hide under this deal. Standard practice under the Additional Protocol, which Iran will implement under this deal, is that the IAEA can request access to any suspicious location with 24 hours’ notice. This deal does not change that baseline.

But there are situations in which the IAEA and a State might negotiate the terms of access before the IAEA actually goes on site, and for that reason, the JCPOA sets an outer limit for those discussions. Even in the circumstance that it took up to 24 days for IAEA access to a suspicious location in the event of a dispute, radioactive evidence would almost certainly still be present in many of the core facilities Iran would need for a covert nuclear weapons program. In other words, Iran would not be able to cover its tracks before granting access, and the United States would be watching, so we would know if Iran tried to do so.

[….]

Via Twitter:

Rep. Vicky Hartzler ‏@RepHartzler

Great turnout tonight in Harrisonville to discuss the Iran Nuclear Deal. [….] 5:18 PM – 14 Aug 2015

Yesterday evening Representative Vicky Hartzler (r) held an open town hall at the community center in Harrisonville, Missouri on the Iran nuclear deal. There were approximately seventy individuals in attendance.

Representative Hartzler (r) is opposed to the deal.


Representative Hartzler (r) greeting individuals in attendance before the start of the event.

Representative Vicky Hartzler (r): [….]

….of course I’m a very big supporter of Israel. I believe we’ve been blessed as a nation because we have been a blessing, uh, to Israel. And if we ever stop being a blessing or support of Israel I think it’s gonna hurt our country. just the right thing to do….

….As you probably heard after the deal was announced there was rallies in the streets in Iran and you had people burning American flags as well as Israel flags and chanting, death to America, death to Israel. And President [Hassan] Rouhani even went to the rally and participated in that. At the same time that, uh, the other world leaders are going back, saying, yeah, this is a good deal. So, gives me pause, I know that….

….So, here’s concerns with the agreement and here’s why I do, uh, not support this agreement. And it is because of these things here.

First of all, it falls short of the anytime anywhere inspections. Uh, Secretary [of State John] Kerry and others said at the beginning that we will have these inspections. Any time you want we’ll be able to go in there and check it out. That is not the case. We now know it’ll take up to twenty-four days to be able to get permission, uh, to be able to get into a site that isn’t listed currently on their list of declared sites. So that’s concerning. And, even if they do agree to all of this within the first ten years, uh, they may not have a nuclear bomb capability if, you know, this all is followed exactly to the letter, uh, and there are no secret, uh, plans going on. But at the end of ten years or even eight years they will have all the, uh, capability they need. They’ll have the centrifuges again, they can take out those thirteen thousand centrifuges that are in storage, they can once again, uh, start ’em up. They will have done research that we will have helped them finance and helped them with the technical ability on the more advanced centrifuges so that they can very quickly, uh, bring up to speed and enrich uranium….

[….]

From the White House:

[….]

The Uranium pathways at Natanz and Fordow

Iran would need two key elements to construct a uranium bomb: tens of thousands of centrifuges and enough highly enriched uranium to produce enough material to construct a uranium bomb.

There are currently two uranium enrichment facilities in the country: the Natanz facility and the Fordow facility.

Let’s take a look at Iran’s uranium stockpile first. Currently, Iran has a uranium stockpile to create 8 to ten nuclear bombs.

But thanks to this nuclear deal, Iran must reduce its stockpile of uranium by 98%, and will keep its level of uranium enrichment at 3.67% – significantly below the enrichment level needed to create a bomb.

Iran also needs tens of thousands of centrifuges to create highly enriched uranium for a bomb. Right now, Iran has nearly 20,000 centrifuges between their Natanz and Fordow facilities. But under this deal, Iran must reduce its centrifuges to 6,104 for the next ten years. No enrichment will be allowed at the Fordow facility at all, and the only centrifuges Iran will be allowed to use are their oldest and least efficient models.

[….]


Representative Hartzler (r) [left] and Jim White (D) [right], the Democratic Party candidate in the 4th Congressional District, in conversation after the event.

At the end of her presentation Representative Hartzler (r) answered written questions on the deal from those in attendance which had been submitted when they entered the meeting room.

Campaign Finance: rolling in

15 Saturday Aug 2015

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

2016, campaign finance, Chris Koster, governor, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission

Yesterday at the Missouri Ethics Commission for a probable (as if anyone doubts it) 2016 Democratic Party gubernatorial candidate:

C031159 08/14/2015 KOSTER FOR MISSOURI Operating Engineers Local 101 Political Action Committee 6601 Winchester Ste 280 Kansas City MO 64133 8/14/2015 $20,000.00

C031159 08/14/2015 KOSTER FOR MISSOURI Gori, Julian & Associates, PC 156 N Main St Edwardsville IL 62025 8/14/2015 $25,000.00

[emphasis added]

Most of these accumulated campaign resources will still be there as the republican candidates spend all their money beating each other up when their primary heats up.

Previously:

Campaign Finance: Working People! (May 11, 2015)

Campaign Finance: it’s been too quiet… (May 21, 2015)

Campaign Finance: again with the working people (May 29, 2015)

Campaign Finance: not a surprise, considering the alternative (June 3, 2015)

Campaign Finance: in someone’s corner June 4, 2015)

Reason enough (June 4, 2015)

Salus populi suprema lex esto (June 5, 2015)

Campaign Finance: they know which side (June 9, 2015)

Campaign Finance: Mr. Smith goes to Jefferson City? (June 12, 2015)

Campaign Finance: to your health (June 17, 2015)

Campaign Finance: to the end of the quarter…and beyond (June 18, 2015)

Campaign Finance: more from working people (June 22, 2015)

Campaign Finance: Bam! (June 24, 2015)

Campaign Finance: running for Governor, may run for Governor, probably running for Governor (June 25, 2015)

Campaign Finance: Is this the start of the end of the quarter rush? (June 30, 2015)

Campaign Finance: inexorable (July 7, 2015)

Campaign Finance: I’ll see your managed care and raise you a home health service… (July 14, 2015)

Chris Koster (D) – July 2015 Campaign Finance Report (July 18, 2015)

Campaign Finance: no surprise here (July 21, 2015)

Campaign Finance: a different constituency (July 29, 2015)

Campaign Finance: no rest (August 3, 2015)

PPP Missouri Poll: 2016 U.S. Senate and Governor – August 11, 2015 (August 11, 2015)

Ooh, that one left a mark

14 Friday Aug 2015

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

2016, Hillary, president, social media, social security, Twitter

Today via Twitter:

Hillary Clinton ‏@HillaryClinton

Today is Social Security’s 80th birthday. Congrats on reaching what some Republicans think should be the retirement age. H 7:03 AM – 14 Aug 2015

The responses by right wingnut Hillary haters not in the 1% are interesting…

The Ferguson dilemma: When keeping up appearances is not enough

13 Thursday Aug 2015

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

appearances, Ferguson, missouri, Pagedale, Press Freedom

There was an article in Monday’s St. Louis Post-Dispatch that described the way that the small St. Louis County municipality of Pagedale was condemning inhabited, livable houses and levying fines for petty housing code violations. A subsequent editorial drew an explicit line between this practice and the over-reliance on revenue generated by traffic violations which was condemned in a recent Department of Justice report. In both cases, poorer citizens bear the brunt of the abuse of municipal power.

With my sincere apologies to those good people who have really tried to bring the lessons of Ferguson home and act upon them, a particular aspect of the misdeeds described seemed emblematic of how many in the St. Louis region have reacted to the issues that have risen in the wake of the killing of Michael Brown and the subsequent protests. This passage among others in the article struck me as jaw-dropping:

At a recent demolition hearing, Mayor Mary Louis Carter told one homeowner after another where they needed to focus their work if they wanted to keep their property: “The first emphasis should be the exterior,” she said repeatedly. One house needed new plumbing, electrical work, a new roof and foundation. Do the outside work first, Carter instructed the homeowner’s lawyer, “it’s a long time before he’s going to be able to use lights or plumbing.”

The mayor explained: “We want to bring our property values up and make our neighborhood look nice.”

Fix the outside and we don’t need to worry about what is on the inside. The folks who live in the houses can deal with the lack of plumbing as long as we don’t have to see or hear about it – and God forbid, as long as it can be kept from anyone looking to buy a house in the neighborhood.

Isn’t this emphasis on keeping up appearances what lies behind the bellyaching of those folks who, beginning a few days after Michael Brown’s death, began moaning about how all this negative publicity would “hurt” Ferguson and the St. Louis region in general? I can’t help but think it’s funny how I didn’t hear too much about any of these concerned citizens going out of their way to deal with issues of race and abuse of police power before the protesters who were the genesis of Black Lives Matter made a little noise. Maybe if anybody had been paying attention before, we might never have had had to deal with front page “Ferguson” on the national – and international – stage.

And isn’t it possible that it is genteel annoyance that our plumbing problems are out in the open for all to see that animates the desire to bring charges against the reporters who witnessed and told the world about the inept response to the Ferguson situation? According to Think Progress:

St. Louis County police are suddenly levying an onslaught of charges against journalists who covered the Ferguson protests last year, accusing them of minor offenses days before the statute of limitations is up. This week alone, three journalists have been charged for interfering with on-duty officers – a full year after their arrests. The recent developments follow an ongoing trend of criminalizing journalists for doing their jobs.

Two of the reporters possibly face $1000 fines and up to a year in jail for “interfering with officers.” Their crime?:

On a separate occasion, several officers – many of whom were armed with assault weapons – entered the restaurant and ordered patrons to leave. Journalists, including Lowery and Reilly, were told they could stay, but the officers later returned and told them they had to leave. Both were arrested and detained for not leaving fast enough, and were released without charges hours later.

As Martin Baron, Executive Editor of the Washington Post, which employs one of the Reporters, Wes Lowery, noted, he “should never have been arrested in the first place. That was an abuse of police authority.”

Let’s see. Abuse of police authority? Wasn’t that the problem to begin with? Only this time it doesn’t have anything to do with us getting our metaphorical linen all dirty, but about punishing and/or impeding folks who expose our dirty linen. Because if nobody knows we soiled our underclothes, doesn’t that mean we’re as bright and shining clean as a new penny?

Reports of your Missouri General Assembly in action

13 Thursday Aug 2015

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

abortion, General Assembly, Medicaid expansion, missouri, social media, Twitter

Today, via Twitter:

barb shelly ‏@bshelly

#MOLeg “sanctity of life” committee grasping for an irregularity in Columbia clinic opening. No bombshell yet. [….] 1:40 PM – 13 Aug 2015

Yael T. Abouhalkah ‏@YaelTAbouhalkah

Glad colleague @bshelly is watching Planned Parenthood witch-hunt. Don’t need to see more #moleg shenanigans today  [….] 1:52 PM – 13 Aug 2015

Sean Nicholson ‏@ssnich

This ‘hearing’ is actually dumber than I expected #moleg 1:53 PM – 13 Aug 2015

Peak Wingnut can never be realized, nor will the Wingnut Event Horizon ever be broached.

Grace Haun ‏@gracehaun

The bombshell is a “Cmte on the Sanctity of Life” isn’t discussing #Medicaid expansion #MoLeg [….]2:06 PM – 13 Aug 2015

Bingo!

Campaign Finance: think of it as motivation

13 Thursday Aug 2015

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

campaign finance, governor, John Brunner, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission

PPP Missouri Poll: 2016 U.S. Senate and Governor – August 11, 2015 (August 11, 2015)

[….]

Q8 (Republicans) Given the choices of Randy Asbury, John Brunner, Bob Dixon, Eric

Greitens, Catherine Hanaway, Peter Kinder, and Bart Korman who would you most like to see as the Republican candidate for Governor next year?

[….]

9% John Brunner

[….]

[emphasis added]

A few days ago at the Missouri Ethics Commission for John Brunner’s (r) 2016 exploratory gubernatorial campaign:

151077 08/11/2015 MISSOURIANS FOR JOHN BRUNNER Melvin Turner PO Box 1255 Hereford AZ 85615 Retired Retired 8/11/2015 $5,001.00

[emphasis added]

There’s work to be done.

Previously:

Campaign Finance: You were expecting anything other than $5,001.00? (April 24, 2015)

John Brunner (r): something or another (April 28, 2015)

Campaign Finance: It’s a good thing yesterday was a slow news day… (May 14, 2015)

Campaign Finance: that’s a lot of exploration (May 16, 2015)

Campaign Finance: probably not the singer (June 8, 2015)

John Brunner (r) – July 2015 Quarterly Campaign Finance Report (July 15, 2015)

Time to drown that “term limits are what we need!” kitten in the river. Again.

12 Wednesday Aug 2015

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

By @BGinKC

Every now and then the notion of term limits for the federal legislature comes around on the gui-tar, and I’m not just going to interupt the sing-along, I’m here to throw the guitar in the campfire and make a scene.

Term limits are the worst idea since peanut butter and jelly in the same jar, and I am sick of dumbass political amateurs being gulled into thinking they’re a good idea by the shadiest of republican operatives.

First off, we have term limits. They’re called “elections.”

Second, who the hell are you (that goes for everyone who isn’t me) to tell me I can’t vote to keep my Congressman if I think he’s doing a good job and I want to keep him doing it? Nobody, that’s who.

The third and fourth things are simply pragmatic. Just as a legislator is getting a grasp on the job and how to do it well, he or she is termed out. That destroys comity, and it places the institutional memory not with the legislators, but with the staffers. As the staffers inevitably leave, the only people who have been around long enough to know the ropes are the lobbyists. (What could possibly go wrong there???)

Just look at the Missouri Legislature. Law schools used to teach about the Missouri Model because our legislature was so effective. But Democrats controlled it. They couldn’t take it fair-and-square, so they cheated. They took control using….wait for it….TERM LIMITS. Yet the notion of Term Limits NEVER came up, not one single time, in any state where Republicans had control of the state houses. Not once. Funny, that.

Let me be clear…I will do anything short of taking up arms to see that term limits never see the light of day in the federal legislature. Term limits disenfranchise voters from voting for the best candidate for the job. Believe it or not, there are real civic-minded people in Congress like Emanuel Cleaver II and Sherrod Brown. They deserve to be sent back as often as they’ll agree to serve with those polecats everyone else sends to D.C.

The problem is MONEY. And the fact Missouri doesn’t have any ethics laws on the books. We have term limits and we have a helluva lot bigger mess in Jeff than they have in DC, not the least of which is Rex Sinquefield’s checkbook. Given the facts on the ground, term limits obviously ain’t the answer.

If state legislatures are the laboratories of democracy, term limits have made the Missouri lege a meth lab of democracy.

Anyone who thinks term limits are a good idea needs to watch the Missouri lege in action, where term limits have been in effect for 15 years. Not one damn legislator knows what the hell they’re doing, the original staffers are gone, and the lobbyists and ALEC write the bills. If anyone can look at our lege and still think term limits are a good idea, that person needs massive amounts of thorazine.

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • Burg Resist – Defend Democracy Rally and Voter Registration Drive – Warrensburg, Missouri – October 3, 2026
  • Schmitt’s Very Bad Week
  • Campaign Finance: an emphatic “NO”
  • “Yes” on 6, “No” on the rest
  • Joined at the hip

Recent Comments

Burg Resist –… on No Kings – Warrensburg,…
Burg Resist –… on Warrensburg, Missouri – No Kin…
Campaign Finance: an… on Campaign Finance: bring a nuke…
Campaign Finance: an… on Campaign Finance: Next
“Yes” on… on Campaign Finance: off to the r…

Archives

  • October 2026
  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,089,968 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...