• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Tag Archives: Roe v Wade

Pro-choice demonstration in Kansas City, Missouri – May 8, 2022

08 Sunday May 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in Resist

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

#resist, abortion, Kansas City, missouri, protest, Roe v Wade, Supreme Court

Late on Monday night an extensive U.S. Supreme Court draft majority opinion by Samuel Alito was leaked indicating the court will reverse Roe v Wade (1973). On Tuesday the Supreme Court confirmed that the document was authentic.

Today in Kansas City several hundred pro-choice demonstrators gathered at Mill Creek Park for a rally and picketing.

Support for the demonstrators from passing traffic came in the form of honking horns, raised arms and fists, and shouts of encouragement.

A very small anti-choice contingent (men, of course) showed up at various times during the demonstration.

The pro-choice demonstrators were diverse and came from many generations. They’re pissed off and activated. This is not going away.

“Now you’ve pissed off grandma”

“I’m a woman, not a womb”

Anti-choice mansplaining:

Someone never fails to make that mistake – berating a large gathering of pissed off women. They didn’t back down. Which seemed to upset him even more.

“I’m here for my grandchildren.”

“Keep your policies off my body”

“Up yours”
“Against abortion? Get a vasectomy”

“Mind your dick”

There were speakers.

Representative Emily Weber (d).

“Pro-life is a lie. You don’t care if people die”

“…I must demand that you stop trying to deny me the rights all people deserve”

“Abortion should be safe, legal, and easily accessible”

“Keep your filthy laws off my silky drawers”

“Get your own, then tell it what to do”

“Against abortion? Get a vasectomy”

“I will not be told what to do by a man who can’t even find the clitoris”

“Don’t tread on me”

“Fuck the patriarchy”

“Pro Roe”

“Our arms are tired off holding these signs since the 1960s”

“Girls just wanna have fundamental rights”

“No uterus, no opinion”

An interview with KCUR radio:

“Our moms and grandmas fought for this”

“You are fucking with the wrong generation”

“No country for old men”

Indeed.

Previously:

Stare decisis don’t mean shit (May 2, 2022)

Into the streets (May 2, 2022)

Gleeful handwringing (May 3, 2022)

It’s the GOP’s world, now you just get to live in it (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 2 (May 3, 2022)

A statement (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 3 (May 3, 2022)

BREAKING NEWS: Pearl-clutcher clutches pearls (May 3, 2022)

Heartland POD: SCOTUS Abortion Case (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 4 (May 4, 2022)

Into the streets, part 5 (May 5, 2022)

McCullen v Coakley (2014) gently weeps (May 5, 2022)

Pro-choice demonstration in Warrensburg, Missouri – May 6, 2022 (May 6, 2022)

Pro-choice demonstration in Warrensburg, Missouri – May 6, 2022, part 2 (May 7, 2022)

Pro-choice demonstration in Warrensburg, Missouri – May 6, 2022

06 Friday May 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in Resist

≈ 7 Comments

Tags

#resist, abortion, missouri, protest, Roe v Wade, Supreme Court, Warrensburg

From 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. today a grassroots pro-choice demonstration, organized online and by word of mouth, took place on the Johnson County Courthouse lawn in downtown Warrensburg. Over 100 individuals participated. There was a constant law enforcement presence. Most passing traffic signaled their support by honking their car horns. A few anti-choice individuals shouted what appeared to be unintelligible talking points which were usually meet with sharp retorts.

This was a much younger crowd and mostly female. They are awake and motivated. It would be a big mistake to ignore or discount their activism.

They were fearless.

Woman’s rights are human rights”

“Keep your bans off my body”
“Not your body? Not your conversation”

“…trying to decipher what your little mythical book has to say about these very real political issues…”

“None of your business”

“If my uterus shot bullets…”

“This is not a surgical instrument”

“My body is not your political playground”

“Why does every woman know another woman that was raped, but no man knows a rapist”

“This land is my land”

Several large trucks trolled the demonstration with drive-bys. One truck, with a barely readable sign (“abortion is murder”) and a defaced American flag trailing from its bed made several passes over the course of the demonstration. The occupants were greeted with jeers and shouts about compensation.

“If my uterus shot bullets the government wouldn’t regulate it”

“Why am I fighting for the same rights my grandma fought for”

“Pro-choice is pro-women”

“Break up with your sexist boyfriends”

Two anti-choice counter-protesters across the street were met with a constant stream of heckling.

“I’m with stupid”

“Keep your laws off my fucking womb”

“You do not get to make my choice for my future”

“Abortion is health care”

Observing from across the street:

Keep your politics out of my uterus”

“Keep your politics out of my uterus”

“Keep your laws off my body”

After pro-choice demonstrators took over the northeast corner the two anti-choice protesters, one with an unreadable sign (“baby lives matter” – come on, can’t they think of anything else?), crossed to the southeast corner to stand next to the police. Two pro-choice protestors crossed to the same corner. A police officer tried to move them back across the street. They refused to move (it’s a public sidewalk) and the main body of pro-choice demonstrators on the courthouse sidewalk jeered and shouted from across the street. The police officer eventually relented.

“Protect women’s rights”

“Don’t let men make laws about a woman’s body”

“My body, my choice”

After 6:00 p.m. the remaining demonstrators marched down the sidewalk toward the University of Central Missouri campus.

Previously:

Stare decisis don’t mean shit (May 2, 2022)

Into the streets (May 2, 2022)

Gleeful handwringing (May 3, 2022)

It’s the GOP’s world, now you just get to live in it (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 2 (May 3, 2022)

A statement (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 3 (May 3, 2022)

BREAKING NEWS: Pearl-clutcher clutches pearls (May 3, 2022)

Heartland POD: SCOTUS Abortion Case (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 4 (May 4, 2022)

Into the streets, part 5 (May 5, 2022)

McCullen v Coakley (2014) gently weeps (May 5, 2022)

McCullen v Coakley (2014) gently weeps

05 Thursday May 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

abortion, First Amendment, Hypocrisy, protest, Roe v Wade, snowflakes, Supreme Court

From the U.S. Supreme Court in 2014:

[….]
In 2007, Massachusetts amended its Reproductive Health Care Facilities Act, which had been enacted in 2000 to address clashes between abortion opponents and advocates of abortion rights outside clinics where abortions were performed. The amended version of the Act makes it a crime to knowingly stand on a “public way or sidewalk” within 35 feet of an entrance or driveway to any “reproductive health care facility,” defined as “a place, other than within or upon the grounds of a hospital, where abortions are offered or performed.”

[….]

Chief Justice Roberts delivered the opinion of the Court.

 A Massachusetts statute makes it a crime to knowingly stand on a “public way or sidewalk” within 35 feet of an entrance or driveway to any place, other than a hospital, where abortions are performed. Mass. Gen. Laws, ch. 266, §§120E½(a), (b) (West 2012). Petitioners are individuals who approach and talk to women outside such facilities, attempting to dissuade them from having abortions. The statute prevents petitioners from doing so near the facilities’ entrances. The question presented is whether the statute violates the First Amendment.

[….]

Petitioners wish to converse with their fellow citizens about an important subject on the public streets and sidewalks—sites that have hosted discussions about the issues of the day throughout history. Respondents assert undeniably significant interests in maintaining public safety on those same streets and sidewalks, as well as in preserving access to adjacent healthcare facilities. But here the Commonwealth has pursued those interests by the extreme step of closing a substantial portion of a traditional public forum to all speakers. It has done so without seriously addressing the problem through alternatives that leave the forum open for its time-honored purposes. The Commonwealth may not do that consistent with the First Amendment.

 The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

It is so ordered.

Today, at the United States Supreme Court:

ABC News @ABC
A new, imposing eight-foot-high fence was erected overnight at the U.S. Supreme Court in the wake of protests over a bombshell draft opinion on abortion.
[….]
1:16 PM · May 5, 2022

Apparently the First Amendment doesn’t apply.

“…Petitioners wish to converse with their fellow citizens about an important subject on the public streets and sidewalks—sites that have hosted discussions about the issues of the day throughout history…”

“…by the extreme step of closing a substantial portion of a traditional public forum to all speakers. It has done so without seriously addressing the problem through alternatives that leave the forum open for its time-honored purposes…”

Apparently the First Amendment doesn’t apply to criticism of the Supreme Court. Snowflakes.

“Choice is Freedom”

Previously:

Stare decisis don’t mean shit (May 2, 2022)

Into the streets (May 2, 2022)

Gleeful handwringing (May 3, 2022)

It’s the GOP’s world, now you just get to live in it (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 2 (May 3, 2022)

A statement (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 3 (May 3, 2022)

BREAKING NEWS: Pearl-clutcher clutches pearls (May 3, 2022)

Heartland POD: SCOTUS Abortion Case (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 4 (May 4, 2022)

Into the streets, part 5 (May 5, 2022)

Into the streets, part 5

05 Thursday May 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

abortion, protest, Roe v Wade, Supreme Court

Late on Monday night an extensive U.S. Supreme Court draft majority opinion by Samuel Alito was leaked indicating the court will reverse Roe v Wade (1973). On Tuesday the Supreme Court confirmed that the document was authentic.

“Oppression is so 1972”

The time is now.

Welcome to 21st Century America.

Previously:

Stare decisis don’t mean shit (May 2, 2022)

Into the streets (May 2, 2022)

Gleeful handwringing (May 3, 2022)

It’s the GOP’s world, now you just get to live in it (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 2 (May 3, 2022)

A statement (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 3 (May 3, 2022)

BREAKING NEWS: Pearl-clutcher clutches pearls (May 3, 2022)

Heartland POD: SCOTUS Abortion Case (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 4 (May 5, 2022)

Into the streets, part 4

04 Wednesday May 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

abortion, protest, Roe v Wade, Supreme Court

Late on Monday night an extensive U.S. Supreme Court draft majority opinion by Samuel Alito was leaked indicating the court will reverse Roe v Wade (1973). Yesterday the Supreme Court confirmed that the document was authentic.

“Girls just wanna have fundamental rights”

Previously:

Stare decisis don’t mean shit (May 2, 2022)

Into the streets (May 2, 2022)

Gleeful handwringing (May 3, 2022)

It’s the GOP’s world, now you just get to live in it (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 2 (May 3, 2022)

A statement (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 3 (May 3, 2022)

BREAKING NEWS: Pearl-clutcher clutches pearls (May 3, 2022)

Heartland POD: SCOTUS Abortion Case (May 3, 2022)

Heartland POD: SCOTUS Abortion Case

03 Tuesday May 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

abortion, Adam Sommer, Heartland POD, Lindsey Simmons, podcast, Roe v Wade

Lindsey Simmons, former candidate for Congress, attorney, and Missouri native joins Adam for a chat to get deep into the legal realities if the leaked draft opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization becomes the final law passed down by SCOTUS.

“…None of your business”

Previously:

Stare decisis don’t mean shit (May 2, 2022)

Into the streets (May 2, 2022)

Gleeful handwringing (May 3, 2022)

It’s the GOP’s world, now you just get to live in it (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 2 (May 3, 2022)

A statement (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 3 (May 3, 2022)

BREAKING NEWS: Pearl-clutcher clutches pearls (May 3, 2022)

BREAKING NEWS: Pearl-clutcher clutches pearls

03 Tuesday May 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in Josh Hawley, social media

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

abortion, Josh Hawley, right wingnut, Roe v Wade, Supreme Court, Virginia

Late last night an extensive U.S. Supreme Court draft majority opinion by Samuel Alito was leaked indicating the court will reverse Roe v Wade (1973). Today the Supreme Court confirmed that the document was authentic.

Josh Hawley (r) [2016 file photo].

This evening:

Josh Hawley @HawleyMO
It should go without saying that if a Justice leaked this, he or she should face impeachment
9:35 AM · May 3, 2022

Think about that for just a second. Apparently participating in an insurrection is just peachy.

Clarence Thomas. Ginni Thomas. We rest our case.

There is the usual hilarity in the responses:

For all the anger releasing this broke no law.

Congress never wrote a law to make this sort of thing illegal,

Didn’t we JUST have a new justice sworn in? Timing is coincidental…[….]

Too stupid to remember to breathe.

Funny that you assume the leaker isn’t one of the conservative Justices, Josh.

And if it wasn’t a SCOTUS Justice, there are plenty of theories why it might have been someone with ties to the GOP.

Hope you’ll stand by your convictions (and we have screenshots)

It should go without saying that if Josh Hawley was involved in the Jan 6th attacked to democracy he should face consequences.

Never happened before that I remember.
New hyper radical justice is seated. 1st major review of RvW and 1st leak takes place.

Too stupid to remember to breathe.

It should also go without saying that plotting to overthrow the government should bar you from being in politics.

This will age well. Have you looked at Ginni Thomas?

So the Supreme Court decisions no longer belong to the American people? We pay their salaries. We pay yours.
Civil Servants decisions that affect all of us
Should be transparent. What kind of Authoritarion crap are you suggesting now?

Unless the leaker is Ginni Thomas in which case Republicans will circle the wagons.

Tell us more of your thoughts on what it’s proper for a civil servant to do or not do

What would be the grounds for impeachment? Any law broken? No. Violate the norms of the institution? Yes. Cause damage to the court’s reputation? Yes.

But let’s look at the sitting justices: committed perjury to get their seats? Yes (4). Conflicts of interest? Yes (1+).

You are the last person I can think of who would be an authority on who should versus who should not be impeached.

And I’m willing to bet a dime to a dollar that if it was Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh or Barrett you will renege on this statement.

Now do Clarence Thomas

It goes without saying that anyone involved in an insurrection shouldn’t have a say in anything.

It’s not the leak of the draft, it’s the absurdly flawed logic behind the draft that has people screaming.

But not when they are involved in an attempted coup ?

Why ? Was national security jeopardized ?

Can you point readers to the code of ethics that SCOTUS has for their behavior? That should help your case here right? So far my money is on Justice Alito since this is playing right into his hands

But not if they perjured themselves in the Senate?

It should go without saying that if a senator supported insurrectionists they should be removed from office immediately.

So not the three that lied under oath when confirmed then?

On what grounds? Seriously what crime against the state would this represent? The shadow docket decisions alone should get 3 of the 5 GQP justices tossed. Where’s the due process?

It should go without saying that if a judge perjures himself and claims to believe Roe is settled law he should be impeached.
It should go without saying that if a justice is engaged in sedition he should be impeached.

You first …. Let’s see ALL your emails, phone calls, and texts leading up to and on Jan. 6th …. We’ll wait. [….]

I wonder if ANYONE has considered the latest appointment to SCOTUS as a possible individual “involved” in the leak ?

Too stupid to remember to breathe.

Ya but let’s keep Clarence who voted while in conflict of interest.
Constitutional lawyer …ya I don’t think so!

Why? Is there a specific law that’s been breached here? It’s not like this is a super confidential document. It’s a draft of something that the Court will presumably publish for all to see. Who cares?

It should go without saying that three Supreme Court justices lied about their support of Roe v. Wade.

With a new Joe Biden appointee. Making the court more 5-4.

Too stupid to remember to breathe.

What about justices whose wives actively plotted to overturn a democratic election?

Maybe the three justices who all lied during their hearings should face impeachment first? Roe is settled law? Ring a bell?

What’s your take on Senators who foment and/or facilitate an insurrection?

Imagine if they promote an insurrection! Let’s pin this quote.

You incited a deadly insurrection. People died, bro.

Imagine being more worried about a leak than the decision that will take body autonomy away from over half the population & set the stage to strip other freedoms from all Americans. Shame on you!

It’s 2022! We will not go backwards.

Based on what?

cc: drunken beer guy

Most probably the newest justice that was confirmed but just guessing.

Too stupid to remember to breathe.

It is a requirement.
and in my opinion it is the newest appointed and confirmed judge.

Too stupid to remember to breathe.

Previously:

Stare decisis don’t mean shit (May 2, 2022)

Into the streets (May 2, 2022)

Gleeful handwringing (May 3, 2022)

It’s the GOP’s world, now you just get to live in it (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 2 (May 3, 2022)

A statement (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 3 (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 3

03 Tuesday May 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

protest, Roe v Wade, Supreme Court

Late last night an extensive U.S. Supreme Court draft majority opinion by Samuel Alito was leaked indicating the court will reverse Roe v Wade (1973). Today the Supreme Court confirmed that the document was authentic.

“We will not go back”

Now is the time.

Previously:

Stare decisis don’t mean shit (May 2, 2022)

Into the streets (May 2, 2022)

Gleeful handwringing (May 3, 2022)

It’s the GOP’s world, now you just get to live in it (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 2 (May 3, 2022)

A statement (May 3, 2022)

A statement

03 Tuesday May 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

abortion, Joe Biden, president, Roe v Wade, statement, Supreme Court, White House

Late last night an extensive U.S. Supreme Court draft majority opinion by Samuel Alito was leaked indicating the court will reverse Roe v Wade (1973).

Joe Biden (D) [2020 file photo].

Statement by President Joe Biden
MAY 03, 2022

We do not know whether this draft is genuine, or whether it reflects the final decision of the Court.

With that critical caveat, I want to be clear on three points about the cases before the Supreme Court.

First, my administration argued strongly before the Court in defense of Roe v. Wade. We said that Roe is based on “a long line of precedent recognizing ‘the Fourteenth Amendment’s concept of personal liberty’… against government interference with intensely personal decisions.” I believe that a woman’s right to choose is fundamental, Roe has been the law of the land for almost fifty years, and basic fairness and the stability of our law demand that it not be overturned.

Second, shortly after the enactment of Texas law SB 8 and other laws restricting women’s reproductive rights, I directed my Gender Policy Council and White House Counsel’s Office to prepare options for an Administration response to the continued attack on abortion and reproductive rights, under a variety of possible outcomes in the cases pending before the Supreme Court. We will be ready when any ruling is issued.

Third, if the Court does overturn Roe, it will fall on our nation’s elected officials at all levels of government to protect a woman’s right to choose. And it will fall on voters to elect pro-choice officials this November. At the federal level, we will need more pro-choice Senators and a pro-choice majority in the House to adopt legislation that codifies Roe, which I will work to pass and sign into law.

Apparently the U.S. Supreme Court has issued a statement, in high dudgeon, that the draft opinion is authentic.

Previously:

Stare decisis don’t mean shit (May 2, 2022)

Into the streets (May 2, 2022)

Gleeful handwringing (May 3, 2022)

It’s the GOP’s world, now you just get to live in it (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 2 (May 3, 2022)

It’s the GOP’s world, now you just get to live in it

03 Tuesday May 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

abortion, PAC, privacy, reproductive rights, Roe v Wade, Supreme Court

Late last night an extensive U.S. Supreme Court draft majority opinion by Samuel Alito was leaked indicating the court will reverse Roe v Wade (1973).

Pre 1973 2022 medical instruments.

From MeidasTouch:

But, her emails.

Previously:

Stare decisis don’t mean shit (May 2, 2022)

Into the streets (May 2, 2022)

Gleeful handwringing (May 3, 2022)

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • Campaign Finance: every little bit counts
  • You shouldn’t have started the war in the first place, dumbass
  • Yep
  • May weather – early morning rain, thunder, and lightning
  • At the Knob Noster Fair – May 30, 2026

Recent Comments

Uh, in case you were… on Some right wingnuts with money…
Winning at losing… on Passing the gas – Donald…
TACO Tuesday | Show… on TACO or Mushrooms?
TACO Tuesday | Show… on So much winning
So much winning | Sh… on Passing the gas – Donald…

Archives

  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,050,005 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...