• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Tag Archives: Supreme Court

A statement

03 Tuesday May 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

abortion, Joe Biden, president, Roe v Wade, statement, Supreme Court, White House

Late last night an extensive U.S. Supreme Court draft majority opinion by Samuel Alito was leaked indicating the court will reverse Roe v Wade (1973).

Joe Biden (D) [2020 file photo].

Statement by President Joe Biden
MAY 03, 2022

We do not know whether this draft is genuine, or whether it reflects the final decision of the Court.

With that critical caveat, I want to be clear on three points about the cases before the Supreme Court.

First, my administration argued strongly before the Court in defense of Roe v. Wade. We said that Roe is based on “a long line of precedent recognizing ‘the Fourteenth Amendment’s concept of personal liberty’… against government interference with intensely personal decisions.” I believe that a woman’s right to choose is fundamental, Roe has been the law of the land for almost fifty years, and basic fairness and the stability of our law demand that it not be overturned.

Second, shortly after the enactment of Texas law SB 8 and other laws restricting women’s reproductive rights, I directed my Gender Policy Council and White House Counsel’s Office to prepare options for an Administration response to the continued attack on abortion and reproductive rights, under a variety of possible outcomes in the cases pending before the Supreme Court. We will be ready when any ruling is issued.

Third, if the Court does overturn Roe, it will fall on our nation’s elected officials at all levels of government to protect a woman’s right to choose. And it will fall on voters to elect pro-choice officials this November. At the federal level, we will need more pro-choice Senators and a pro-choice majority in the House to adopt legislation that codifies Roe, which I will work to pass and sign into law.

Apparently the U.S. Supreme Court has issued a statement, in high dudgeon, that the draft opinion is authentic.

Previously:

Stare decisis don’t mean shit (May 2, 2022)

Into the streets (May 2, 2022)

Gleeful handwringing (May 3, 2022)

It’s the GOP’s world, now you just get to live in it (May 3, 2022)

Into the streets, part 2 (May 3, 2022)

It’s the GOP’s world, now you just get to live in it

03 Tuesday May 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

abortion, PAC, privacy, reproductive rights, Roe v Wade, Supreme Court

Late last night an extensive U.S. Supreme Court draft majority opinion by Samuel Alito was leaked indicating the court will reverse Roe v Wade (1973).

Pre 1973 2022 medical instruments.

From MeidasTouch:

But, her emails.

Previously:

Stare decisis don’t mean shit (May 2, 2022)

Into the streets (May 2, 2022)

Gleeful handwringing (May 3, 2022)

Gleeful handwringing

03 Tuesday May 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in social media, US Senate

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

abortion, missouri, right wingnut, Roe v Wade, social media, Supreme Court, Twitter, Vicky Hartzler

Of course.

Vicky Hartzler (r) [2021 file photo].

Last night:

Rep. Vicky Hartzler @RepHartzler
This leak is outrageous & dangerous.

I pray & remain hopeful #SCOTUS stays true to this potential decision, but this unprecedented, intentional leak is malicious & threatens the independence of our highest court.

Our judicial system should never be intimidated by the woke Left.
[….]
8:49 PM · May 2, 2022

We see you.

Pre 1973 2022 medical equipment.

Some of the responses:

Overturning Roe is outrageous and dangerous. Whose rights are they going after next?

I don’t see how the leak changes anything.

Why would you be mad the public has access to decisions that will change their lives? Perhaps you know this isn’t what the majority of Americans want?

You could have also said nothing, and discreetly and professionally handled this as part of your job.

See above.

It’s especially awful when a woman hates other women and wants the government to have control over their bodies and medical decisions.

Also, if you’re so proud of taking away my right to autonomy, why do you care about the leak? Like who gives a shit? You got what you wanted right?

Hawley’s folks are doing a good job of writing horrible tweets for you, Vicky. You’re a worthless puppet.

Imagine being more upset at a leaked memo than the fact that poor women in America are going to resort to unsafe and dangerous back alley abortions since people like Vicky sure as hell aren’t going to lift a finger to fund social services for at risk communities.

That’s the plan.

There’s nothing in the Constitution that says a draft can’t be leaked. (PS social media intern, they’re coming for your birth control next, and you work for a grifter)

We see what you did there.

Kick rocks

And Congress should never be intimidated by a rapid mob incited by your narcissistic boss.

But you’re cool with that.

The court has been tinged by partisanship for decades, you despicably duplicitous, disingenuous dipshit.

How the FUCK do you put this on the left. Woman, you get this, right? This is a direct assault on you!!! WE women are now less than! How the FUCK do you stand in your political lane as a woman? Pathetic!

Women in medical crisis will die.
Abortion is healthcare.

“I will not go quietly back to the 1950s”

Previously:

Stare decisis don’t mean shit (May 2, 2022)

Into the streets (May 2, 2022)

Into the streets

02 Monday May 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 8 Comments

Tags

abortion, protest, Roe v Wade, Supreme Court

Now is the time.

“No country for old men”

Previously:

Stare decisis don’t mean shit (May 2, 2022)

53-47

08 Friday Apr 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in Josh Hawley, Roy Blunt, US Senate

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Josh Hawley, Ketanji Brown Jackson, right wingnuts, Roy Blunt, Supreme Court, U.S. Senate

Historical.

Roll Call Vote 117th Congress – 2nd Session
Question: On the Nomination (Confirmation: Ketanji Brown Jackson, of the District of Columbia, to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States)
Vote Number: 134
Vote Date: April 7, 2022, 01:53 PM
Required For Majority: 1/2Vote
Result: Nomination Confirmed
Nomination Number: PN1783
Nomination Description: Ketanji Brown Jackson, of the District of Columbia, to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States
Vote Counts:
YEAs 53
NAYs 47
[….]
Blunt (R-MO), Nay
Hawley (R-MO), Nay
[….]

[emphasis added]

On the wrong side of history, again:

Roy Blunt (r) [2016 file photo].

Josh Hawley (r) [2016 file photo].

We should expect more. Unfortunately, we can’t.

Previously:

A Yale law degree doesn’t have much of a cachet these days… (March 18, 2022)

Incomprehensible word salad (April 3, 2022)

Incomprehensible word salad

03 Sunday Apr 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in Roy Blunt, social media, US Senate

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Ketanji Brown Jackson, missouri, right wingnut, Roy Blunt, social media, Supreme Court, Twitter, U.S. Senate

Not that we’re surprised.

Roy Blunt (r) [2016 file photo].

Today:

Senator Roy Blunt @RoyBlunt
There is no doubt Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson is well qualified to serve on the Supreme Court. However, her judicial philosophy is not one I can support.
10:26 AM · Apr 3, 2022

Senator Roy Blunt @RoyBlunt
With every Supreme Court nomination, I look at two things: (1) is the nominee qualified; and (2) are they guided by a judicial philosophy that a judge ought to apply the law and the Constitution as they are written.
10:26 AM · Apr 3, 2022

Senator Roy Blunt @RoyBlunt
While I will vote no on Judge Jackson’s confirmation, I believe her historic nomination is a proud moment for our country. [….]
10:26 AM · Apr 3, 2022

There was much hilarity in the responses:

Can’t have it both ways. Your statement clearly states that it is always politics over country.

You cannot have this both ways. If you think she is qualified, vote to confirm. Otherwise, you are blocking her historic nomination and have no claim to celebrate it.

You do not get to play this both ways, sorry. What about Amy Coney Barrett made her so qualified? Kavangh? You simply do not want to see change of this nature. Your perspective is exactly why I am no longer a republican after 40 yrs of voting.

Jesus H Christ.

Always party over country. Always.

So she’s qualified and her nomination is a proud moment for the country. But one that you don’t support? You can’t be proud for this moment in our history if you’re on the wrong side of it.

Blunt had a chance to support qualified, brilliant black judge and make history in a good way.
Trump Senator Blunt failed

Good to see you’re holding the Republican line to the end. No one could claim you bring an independent thinker, Mitch raised you well.

The former guy has you well trained in double speak. None of what you say makes any sense. Why didn’t you just say “I will not vote for her”. PERIOD.

Funny, Clarence Thomas meets the criteria for being removed from the bench and was never qualified to be nominated for associate justice to begin with.
So there’s that.

“I believe her historic nomination is a proud moment for our country.” NO YOU DON’T.

You just defend “#Hypocrisy” for all time.

You embarrass me as a Missourian

Coward

Judicial philosophy? Bullshit…you won’t vote for her because she’s black, female, and a whole helluva lot smarter and more principled than you are.

Yet another politician, trying to play “both sides of the street”. An activity that so many politicians are proficient at. In fact, it may be their most common ‘talent’. Apparently, Mr. Blunt is so out of touch with rationality, that he thinks that his doubletalk is reasonable.

You have no honor, sir. I guess you didn’t see her hearing. She did not define her judicial philosophy other than to say that it is a methodology. She wouldn’t let the Republicans define her and then use that against her. Not voting for her is sheer meanness and bad politics.

Coward, hypocrite

It also means that your “no” vote is a disgraceful moment for our country.

We didn’t expect YOU to vote for her. So this isn’t new. You had your mind made up well before she was nominated. It would be a no for anyone nominated by President Biden. And that’s the real truth. I can’t wait till you’re gone.

This is the stupidest thing you could possibly write.

Utterly useless for Missouri.

Yada Yada Yada. Of course you’re voting no. You don’t have permission from Mitch. #Spineless

Schmuck

Roy, you are a hypocrite. Judge Jackson is highly qualified for this appointment. Her previous roles were for a life-time appointment. You cannot celebrate this “proud” moment if you were not part of it. You voted for whining/sniveling Kavanaugh. You are a political hack.

Just stop it… “U will vote no, but “it’s a proud moment for our country” Pure garbage. If you really thought it was proud, it would make sense that you voted yes. Stop playing American people for fools.

Sounds like you expect a judge to use their political views to make their decisions. Also sounds like you have no idea what you’re talking about.

Talking out of both sides of your mouth. Pathetic.

You are an embarrassment

You’re a fraud. My only regret with you finally leaving the Senate is that I won’t be able to vote against you again.

You are a disgrace.

What a jackass. It is politicians like Roy Blunt, who’s clownish attempts to have it both ways are disgraceful, that have given charlatan con men such as Donald Trump the opening, or vacuum of competency and honesty that they needed, in order to attract their own followers.

But, alas, it is certainly not a “proud moment” for Roy Blunt, who has shown publicly that what is of greatest importance to him is not loyalty to the United States, or fair play, but instead, his own blind servitude to the Republican Party. Another cynical, corrupt politician.

You’re less than worthless

Clarence Thomas who?

24 Thursday Mar 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in Josh Hawley, US Senate

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Clarence Thomas, Josh Hawley, Ketanji Brown Jackson, right wingnut, Supreme Court, U.S. Senate

Inconvenient timing.

Josh Hawley (r) [2016 file photo].

Previously:

In a world full of people like Josh Hawley (r), be a Cory Booker (D) (March 23, 2022)

This is the GOP in the 21st Century (March 23, 2022)

Asked and answered

24 Thursday Mar 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in social media, US Senate

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Ketanji Brown Jackson, missouri, right wingnut, social media, Supreme Court, Twitter, Vicky Hartzler

Representative Vicky Hartzler (r) [2016 file photo].

You were expecting anything else?:

Rep. Vicky Hartzler @RepHartzler
If the #SCOTUS hearings were an episode of Wheel of Fortune [….]
[….]
5:26 PM · Mar 24, 2022

Answered:

Joy-Ann (Pro-Democracy) Reid @JoyAnnReid
Clearly the answer to the right wing question #WhatIsAWoman is: a person you collect a bounty on if she tries to get an abortion and who you shrug at and say “have the baby or we’ll sue you” if she gets raped. Also: someone whose job is to have big boobs and get men a sandwich.
4:33 PM · Mar 24, 2022

Joy-Ann (Pro-Democracy) Reid @JoyAnnReid
Also #WhatIsAWoman — a person you pay 80 percent of what you pay a man to do the same job; or 60-67 percent if she’s Black, Hispanic, AAPI or indigenous.
[….]
4:33 PM · Mar 24, 2022

Joy-Ann (Pro-Democracy) Reid @JoyAnnReid
Also #WhatIsAWoman — A person, whether cis or trans, old or young, whom the right does not feel they need bother to respect if she is not white or MAGA or Christian or conservative. Even if she is a sitting federal judge. I think that about sums it up.
[….]
4:33 PM · Mar 24, 2022

Vicky Hartzler (r) won’t get it.

In a world full of people like Josh Hawley (r), be a Cory Booker (D)

23 Wednesday Mar 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in US Senate

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Cory Booker, Josh Hawley, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Supreme Court, U.S. Senate

Nope:

Josh Hawley (r) [2016 file photo].

Yep:

Senator Cory Booker (D) [2019 file photo]

They are not going to steal the joy.

This is the GOP in the 21st Century

23 Wednesday Mar 2022

Posted by Michael Bersin in social media

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

critical race theory, CRT, GOP, Ketanji Brown Jackson, racist, right wingnuts, social media, Supreme Court

Yesterday, from the GOP.

GOP @GOP
[….]
9:52 AM · Mar 22, 2022

The GOP definition of Critical Race Theory? We’ll wait.

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • Campaign Finance: “…and they shall sow the public right of way and all the empty lots across the land with their yard signs…”
  • What color is the sky in Denny’s (r) world?
  • Burg Resist – Defend Democracy Rally and Voter Registration Drive – Warrensburg, Missouri – October 3, 2026
  • Schmitt’s Very Bad Week
  • Campaign Finance: an emphatic “NO”

Recent Comments

Campaign Finance:… on Campaign Finance: bring a nuke…
Campaign Finance:… on Campaign Finance: Next
Steve Duane Phipps on Burg Resist – Defend Dem…
What color is the sk… on Being obtusely wrong still mak…
What color is the sk… on Justice Brett Kavanaugh…

Archives

  • October 2026
  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,090,322 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...