• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Tag Archives: Dick Cheney

One must never, ever criticize the family business

18 Tuesday Jun 2019

Posted by Michael Bersin in social media

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

concentration camps, Dick Cheney, Donald Trump, immigration, Liz Cheney, social media, Twitter

This morning on Twitter, from Liz Cheney (r) (a U.S. Representative from Wyoming):

Liz Cheney @Liz_Cheney
Please @AOC do us all a favor and spend just a few minutes learning some actual history. 6 million Jews were exterminated in the Holocaust. You demean their memory and disgrace yourself with comments like this.
[….]
9:25 AM – 18 Jun 2019

Some of the responses:

Actually if you do some research you would know that there was a huge difference between concentration camps and death camps. May I suggest you travel to Terezín then Dachau to see for yourself.

To be fair, the Cheney family are huge experts on human rights violations …

Jew here who spent three years as a professional historical researcher. Before I block you so insipid, morally bankrupt comments like your don’t darken my timeline again, two things:

1. They’re concentration camps
2. This ain’t your lane

please @Liz_Cheney, daughter of war criminal-profiteer – as you are not a Jew or a member of a rebuked community just please STFU about us. Your comments are sacrilegious, whereas @AOC actually is way ahead of you in every way imaginable.

Yeah, we’ve got pedants debating what “counts” as a “real” concentration camp, instead of thinking about what they lead to. The last words of the Republic will be “well, actually…”

2016: “You act like Trump will be building concentration camps.”

2019: “I think calling them ‘concentration camps’ is inflammatory.”

Here’s some actual history for you:

During World War II, the Japanese American internees at Heart Mountain — in your state of Wyoming — called that a “concentration camp” as well.

.@Liz_Cheney, don’t speak for me or my Jewish ancestors. In fact, @AOC is correct. You don’t understand history. You demean their memory by failing to see that “Never Again” is now. By supporting Trump, you promote cruelty, concentration camps, and racism

The history here is just not complicated. I’m just waiting for Liz to say actually concentration camps are good!

Jew here. @AOC’s point is exactly why we say “Never forget.” The Holocaust did not begin with the murder of 6 million Jews. It began with the same dehumanization, deportation, and internment we see today. You, sickeningly, invoke the Holocaust to minimize their suffering. Shame.

Also, Liz, we prefer you don’t say “exterminated” about people. That’s for rats and cockroaches (both Nazi metaphors for the Jews they murdered, incidentally!).

If I were the daughter of a man who lied to start a war for his own gain that annihilated 1/2 million humans, Id keep my head down & mouth shut. Your head is up your *** while you mouth off with stunning, indefensible ignorance. Way to not have learned a damn thing, #LizCheney

Also, the Holocaust did not start with the death of 6 million.

It started with an authoritarian populist scapegoating a despised minority for his country’s economic problems, and increasingly using govt power to terrorize them.

Warmonger’s daughter says what?

Go fuck yourself Liz. Like you care about Jews or minorities.

Hey, Liz – I’m glad you want to learn history. Let’s start.

The Holocaust began in Hitler’s ninth year in power, after years of Hitler saying the things Trump is saying now.

Kristallnacht would be in 2022 if we keep on the same pace, which we have so far.

Thanks for listening.

I guess I’m not surprised that the daughter of a war criminal would be mad about calling concentration camps what they are.

ICYMI The daughter of a war criminal is scolding a person for calling out a humanitarian crisis.

Idk Liz, could you maybe read up on all the death your own father caused before lecturing someone utilizing an entirely incorrect interpretation of what a concentration camp actually is

Imagine being the daughter of a war criminal who literally has no heart and asking other people to learn history. Biden might like your family but the rest of us remember your dad belongs in The Hague.

Well, Liz, actually they are concentration camps. And the US operated them against US citizens who had Japanese backgrounds during WW2. Please, take a seat, and let someone knowledgeable speak.

How dare you @Liz_Cheney? If you had any grasp of history, you would know that the Holocaust did not start with gas chambers, it started by moving “undesirables” into camps where they could be concentrated, away from the general populace. Sound familiar?

The final solution started with dehumanizing a group of people. That is what is happening today.

Sorry, Liz, but the Holocaust STARTED with detainment. It’s a tragedy that those who protested then were detained themselves or shouted down. And that’s what you’re doing, right… now.

As more tragedies happen in our custody, we will remember you said this.

What is going on now in the States is literally what was happening in the Reich at the beginning of the war.

Read a book, Cheney. These are concentration camps.

Read a book and feel shame.

Concentration camps aren’t necessarily camps where they kill people, that’s death camps. Concentration camps are where they put a load of people in effectively a prison without trial, which is exactly what the USA does. They’re often the first step on the way towards death camps

People like you, powerful people who equivocate and deflect, who provide cover to monsters, take all the mystery out of how modern societies commit genocide.

We see you. We see what you are doing.

Let’s see…
Overcrowding, check.
Inadequate food, water, and medical care, check.
Separating families, check.
Abuse by staff, check.
Indefinite detention, check.
No access to legal recourse, check.

Ok…what word should we use for these places?

how do you think the holocaust started liz

Funny how Republicans want to redefine words and history to pretend that “concentration camp” must mean “death camp”, and then further claim that anything short of this is okay.

I’m Jewish. People like you think of the Holocaust only in terms of the final outcome. It began though with fear mongering, pogroms, and the ghettoizing of Jews. There was a build up to the camps. What is happening at our border carries the same spirit of Germany in 1938.

I know, I know, it’s far easier for @Liz_Cheney to take advantage of Americans’ misunderstanding of history and what concentration camps are to rant that @AOC is saying the US government is running death camps. That doesn’t change the fact that we are running concentration camps.

You don’t speak for me. As someone who has family that was lost in the Holocaust, I don’t need an apology from AOC. What’s happening at the border is horrible and the reason we say Never Again.

My grandmother survived four years at Auschwitz. Her entire family was killed. From the stories she has told me, Donald Trump is indeed running concentration camps. We don’t know how many people are dying. They didn’t either in the 1930s.

Sit down, Liz.

The Holocaust began with the demonization of Jews and other minorities and culminated in the camps. My father, of blessed memory, survived Buchenwald, but was persecuted well before his transport there. @Liz_Cheney, do not minimize the hate, bigotry, and prejudice that exists.

This is a cowardly dodge @Liz_Cheney. Using historical memory as a human shield for your own complicity in current atrocity is… an atrocity.

Please, describe what’s happening in a way that doesn’t sound like a concentration camp?

Have they started using the old Japanese internment camps yet? You know, if you’ve got a bunch of old concentration camps laying around, you.might as well use them? Am I right, Liz?

Austrian here. AOC is en pointe. It starts always small, but when u r putting kids in camps, u r wayyy down the lane kinda all the way into fascism.
They r concentration camps.

“GOP representative gets offended when someone calls their draconian policies by their actual names”

You know what? This tweet disgraces every decent and good American. Not to mention history, the dead, and why we fought World War II

Don’t mind me. I’m just here to watch the war criminal’s daughter train to claim the moral high ground with the usual historical illiteracy.

Look, I know you’ve got lots of experience trying to rationalize away crimes against humanity — I mean, Thanksgiving would be awkward otherwise! — but maybe leave this one to people who know what they’re talking about.

I realize that if there’s one thing the Cheney family knows, it’s War Crimes. Still – ‘actual history’ isn’t on your side on this one. Just please remember when you do your research ‘good guys on both sides’ does NOT apply to these camps. Don’t need you coming back with ideas.

I’d recommend learning the history yourself. Holocaust and concentration camp historians have classified the immigration centers as concentration camps. Based on *checks notes* the history that Liz Cheney did not read.

What is they say about glass houses? I’m pretty confident that anybody with the name Cheney is disqualified from spouting outrage.

Welcome to America in 2019.

Bad company

09 Wednesday Sep 2015

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

4th Congressional District, Dick Cheney, Iran, Iraq, John Bolton, missouri, Vicky Hartzler

Yesterday:

….In an interview with CNN on Tuesday, the Senate Democratic leader [Harry Reid] said no one with “any degree of intelligence” should agree with the former vice president [Dick Cheney], who strongly opposes the agreement.

“I’m sorry, I cannot hold back a smile,” Reid said just hours after Cheney delivered a stinging rebuke of the deal. “There are a lot of good reasons for this deal. But the best is that Cheney’s against it. I mean, think about this: The architect of the worst foreign policy decision in the history of America – to invade Iraq. Look what it has done. Why would anyone with any degree of intelligence agree with him?”

[….]

Indeed, why?

Meanwhile, Missouri 4th Congressional District Representative Vicky Hartzler (r) can’t help herself:

Rep. Vicky Hartzler ‏@RepHartzler

Congress votes this week on the President’s #IranDeal. Read why I am against this bad deal. #NoNuclearIran [….[ 12:01 PM – 8 Sep 2015

Previously:

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): it all depends on which questions you choose to ask (May 13, 2015)

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): on the Iran nuclear deal – Harrisonville, MO – August 14, 2015 (August 15, 2015)

The world remains the same

11 Thursday Dec 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Dick Cheney, media criticism, torture

A picket sign from 2002.

Nothing much has changed, eh?

Cheney blasts Senate interrogation report

David Jackson, USA TODAY 9:19 p.m. EST December 10, 2014

Former Vice President Dick Cheney ripped a new Senate report on harsh interrogation techniques Wednesday as a “terrible piece of work” that throws CIA officials “under the bus” for political reasons.

“The report is full of crap, excuse me,” Cheney said during an interview on Fox News….

….Cheney, the highest-ranking official from the George W. Bush administration to comment publicly since the Senate released its report on Tuesday, also said Bush was “fully informed” about the interrogation program….

[….]

Principles of International Law Recognized in the Charter of the Nüremberg Tribunal and in the Judgment of the Tribunal, 1950.

[….]

Principle III

The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law acted as Head of State or responsible Government official does not relieve him from responsibility under international law.

[….]

[emphasis added]

Excuse him? Never. And that’s what really chafes his ass.

“…the lesson that this long course in human wickedness had taught us-the lesson of the fearsome, word-and-thought-defying banality of evil…” – Hannah Arendt, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil

Nothing has changed.

Previously:

A Small Clique Of Legal Extremists… (February 24, 2008)

We have already determined what we are… (December 9, 2014)

“…to otherwise commit moral and national suicide by euphemism.” (December 10, 2014)

“Why do you want access to evil?”

19 Thursday Jun 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Dick Cheney, irony, Kansas City, missouri

Former Vice President Dick Cheney (r) recently wrote something which was carried by a widely distributed newspaper. Why would anyone provide a forum for free to someone who’s been wrong about everything for so many years? Just asking.

In Kansas City on December 12, 2003:

“Why do you want access to evil?” – across the street from Barney Allis Plaza in Kansas City

picketing then Vice President Dick Cheney at a fundraiser – December 12, 2003.

From Scott Lemieux at Lawyers, Guns & Money:

Ongoing Notes On the Death of Parody

June 18, 2014 | Scott Lemieux

Shorter Verbatim Dick and Liz Cheney: “Rarely has a U.S. president been so wrong about so much at the expense of so many.”

If he were talking about his own administration, it would even be accurate! I look forward to Michael Brown’s critique of the Obama administration’s disaster management policies….

At Balloon Juice:

The Death of Irony

Betty Cracker

7:11 am Jun 18 2014

Irony shuffled dispiritedly from his bedroom in worn, smelly pajamas, fetching yesterday’s copy of The Wall Street Journal from the magazine rack, brewing a cup of tea and sitting down with a sigh at the ratty, stained kitchen table.

He wondered for the thousandth time that morning if life was worth living in this new age, an era in which he could not shake the suspicion that he was obsolete. Waving these depressing thoughts away, he opened the paper to the opinion section….

….And with that, Irony rose determinedly from the table, fashioned a noose from the belt of his bathrobe, secured it around his neck, leapt up onto the table and tied the other end to the chandelier, kicked the table away and ended it all. The end.

Image

Cheney the Interrogator

21 Sunday Apr 2013

Tags

Barack Obama, Boston Marathon Bombing, Cartoons of Barack Obama, Cartoons of Dick Cheney, Dick Cheney, Enhanced Interrogation, Homeland Security, Political Cartoons, Terrorism, war on terror

Posted by Michael Bersin | Filed under Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

The United States of America in a nutshell

01 Thursday Sep 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

crimes against humanity, Dick Cheney, torture

Previously: His sock puppet used a crayon, he used blood and oil (August 30, 2011)

Getting Away With Torture

Dick Cheney’s memoir shows the importance of the law, not of torture.

By Dahlia Lithwick

Posted Tuesday, Aug. 30, 2011, at 5:23 PM ET

….Dick Cheney is living proof that if we are not brave enough to enforce our laws, we will forever be at the mercy of a handful of men.

We are not worthy.

His sock puppet used a crayon, he used blood and oil

30 Tuesday Aug 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

book, crimes against humanity, Dick Cheney

Apparently, the dark lord has written a book and is hawking it.

“No blood for oil.”

@democracynow Democracy Now!

Ex-Bush Official Col. Lawrence Wilkerson: “I Am Willing To Testify” If Dick #Cheney Is Put On Trial owl.li/6gAjV @ggreenwald 2 hours ago

“….This is a book written out of fear, fear that one day someone will ‘Pinochet’ Dick Cheney,” says Wilkerson, alluding to the former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet, who was arrested for war crimes. Wilkerson also calls for George W. Bush and Cheney to be held accountable for their crimes in office. “I’d be willing to testify, and I’d be willing to take any punishment I’m due,” Wilkerson said….

That’s some book review. Damn, in the coming days and weeks we’re all gonna need garlic if we stroll past the remainder bin at our favorite bulk shopping venues.

Richard Armitage at Missouri Boys State: via Twitter

16 Tuesday Jun 2009

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Boys State, Dick Cheney, missouri, Obama, Richard Armitage, Twitter

Former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage in Hendricks Hall at the University of Central Missouri in Warrensburg.

Twitter posts on the speech by former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage and the question and answer session which followed:

At Missouri Boys State covering speech by former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage for Show Me Progress. Starts in half an hour. about 3 hours ago from web

On mistakes and the outing of Valerie Plame:

Richard Armitage at Missouri Boys State: mistakes – “I am inadvertently responsible for leaking the name of a covert agent’s identity.” about 2 hours ago from web

Richard Armitage at Missouri Boys State: “Why am I not in jail [for leak]? I told the truth [to Justice Department].” about 2 hours ago from web

On the economic/political prognosis:

Richard Armitage at Missouri Boys State: “If China comes out of recession better and more quickly [than us], their model will prevail. about 2 hours ago from web

North Korea and their nuclear program:

Richard Armitage at Missouri Boys State: “There are no really sweet options wen it comes to North Korea.” about 2 hours ago from web

On the election in Iran:

Richard Armitage at Missouri Boys State: “I personally believe that Ahmadinejad [Iran] cheated and didn’t need to.” [on the election] about 2 hours ago from web

By Armitage’s definitions “soft power” is the equivalent to attraction and “hard power” is the equivalent to coercion.

Richard Armitage at Missouri Boys State: “I believe President Obama’s use of [soft power] will succeed.” [contrast Bush’s ‘hard power’] about 2 hours ago from web

On Dick Cheney’s inability to keep from speaking out:

Richard Armitage at Missouri Boys State: “I completely disagree with [former VP] Cheney.” [on Obama administration critism] about 1 hour ago from web

Richard Armitage at Missouri Boys State: “I think he [Cheney] needs to, in your words, ‘pipe down’. I think it’s unseemly.” about 1 hour ago from web

Richard Armitage at Missouri Boys State: “It makes him [Cheney] look so mean spirited.” about 1 hour ago from web

Richard Armitage-MO Boys State: “I don’t want our president to fail. I think Mr. Cheney’s comments lean in that direction. I don’t like it.” about 1 hour ago from web

On the difference between the last two presidents:

Richard Armitage at Missouri Boys State: “Mr. Obama is using both soft and hard power more intelligently.” [Bush used hard power] about 1 hour ago from web

Richard Armitage at Missouri Boys State: [on serving the present administration] “If the telephone rang, the answer would be yes.” about 1 hour ago from web

 

A Tale of Two Vice Presidents: Al Gore 2002 – Dick Cheney 2009

25 Monday May 2009

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

al gore, Dick Cheney, media criticism

In September 2002, after almost two years out of office, former Vice President Al Gore publicly criticized the Bush administration’s rush to war with Iraq in a speech in San Francisco:

Al Gore – September 23, 2002

IRAQ AND THE WAR ON TERRORISM

Al Gore

Former U.S. Vice President

…Moreover, President Bush is demanding in this high political season that Congress speedily affirm that he has the necessary authority to proceed immediately against Iraq and, for that matter, under the language of his resolution, against any other nation in the region, regardless of subsequent developments or emerging circumstances. Now, the timing of this sudden burst of urgency to immediately take up this new cause as America’s new top priority, displacing our former top priority, the war against Osama Bin Laden, was explained innocently by the White House chief of staff in his now well-known statement that “From a marketing point of view, you don’t introduce new products in August…”

After being out of office and power for a fraction of that time former Vice President Dick Cheney has been speaking out against the policies of the Obama administration:

Posted on Thursday, May 21, 2009

Cheney’s speech ignored some inconvenient truths

By Jonathan S. Landay and Warren P. Strobel | McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON – Former Vice President Dick Cheney’s defense Thursday of the Bush administration’s policies for interrogating suspected terrorists contained omissions, exaggerations and misstatements.

In his address to the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative policy organization in Washington, Cheney said that the techniques the Bush administration approved, including waterboarding – simulated drowning that’s considered a form of torture – forced nakedness and sleep deprivation, were “legal” and produced information that “prevented the violent death of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of innocent people…”

Evidently some of the media aren’t as worshipful as he’d like, but he does get access. Why would Dick do this?:

Dick Cheney: Why So Chatty All of a Sudden?

By Michael Duffy / WASHINGTON Wednesday, May. 13, 2009

…A more likely explanation is that Cheney, who championed the idea of preemptive-attack doctrine as Vice President, knows that in politics as well the best defense is often a good offense. With the White House decision to release various Bush-era memos on interrogation, and the coming disclosure of thousands more photographs from Abu Ghraib later this month, Cheney is “trying to rewrite history,” says a Republican consultant who has experience in intelligence matters. “He knows that as time goes by, he will look worse. And so he’s trying to put his stroke on it…

Well yeah, those photos haven’t been released yet. But they will be.

A good portion of the media coverage of Al Gore’s dissent in 2002 was less then deferential, including republican talking points in their coverage:

Gore challenges Bush Iraqi policy

Questions the timing of a military strike

From John Mercurio

CNN Washington Bureau

Tuesday, September 24, 2002 Posted: 3:38 PM EDT (1938 GMT)

…Republicans were quick to dismiss Gore’s remarks as overtly political.

“It seemed to be a speech more appropriate for a political hack than a presidential candidate by someone who clearly fails to recognize leadership. It was a contradiction within a contradiction,” said RNC spokeswoman Tracey Schmitt…

Updated 9/24/2002 3:56 AM

Gore blasts Bush on Iraq war

By Susan Page and Richard Benedetto, USA TODAY

…Asked to respond, White House spokesman Scott McClellan said, “The president has united America and America has rallied behind the call for action, and he will continue to lead and unify even if splits begin to emerge within the Democratic party and its presidential candidates.”

Republican National Committee spokesman Jim Dyke dismissed Gore’s speech as crafted “for a political hack.” He said Gore “may be serving a political purpose in appeasing a certain segment of the Democrat party that wants to use this type of rhetoric…”

In 2009 the White House has been a little more circumspect:

THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary

__________________________________________________

For Immediate Release                   May 22, 2009

 

PRESS BRIEFING

BY

PRESS SECRETARY ROBERT GIBBS

James S. Brady Press Briefing Room

12:23 P.M. EDT

…Q : About the great debate yesterday, how does the President feel about having Cheney speaking on the same day? In a way is he pleased to have these speeches in such sharp relief that it gave the public a chance to say, okay, here’s column A, here’s column B, and to compare it? And also, how does the President feel about the propriety of a Vice President who just only recently left office speaking out? President Bush said he was not going to for a while. Presidents usually keep pretty quiet that first year after leaving office. Are there different rules for Vice Presidents? What are your thoughts?

MR. GIBBS: The second one is a good question. I don’t know what the rules are. I mean, obviously, anybody is free to speak. I think many, as well as you, have noted that the President and the Vice President have taken different tacks since leaving office about what they’re going to do and what they’re going to say. As I said yesterday, watching Vice President Cheney appears as if he’s extending an argument that my sense was had inside these walls for many years during the administration which he served as Vice President.

I think the President — in terms of yesterday’s speeches side by side I think the President is not going to shy away from the debate on these issues. I think that was evident yesterday, and I think he always thinks it’s helpful for the American people to be able to see, as you said, side by side, what the competing debate and narratives are. I don’t think that’s anything he’s going to shy away from.

I think both would understand that these are complex issues, big decisions that have to be made, that the President is going to do all in his power to keep the American people safe. But he is strongly committed to the notion that we’re going to change the way we conduct our foreign policy.

Q:  And he sees nothing inappropriate in what the former Vice President —

MR. GIBBS: I mean, you know, I think the President would leave it up to the Vice President as to determine what he wants to do…

And our old media considers Dick Cheney a “star”:

Howard Fineman

Meet the Real RNC

Ignore the party, Rush, Newt and Cheney are the muscle

May 20, 2009 | Updated: 9:14  p.m. ET May 20, 2009

…Right now there are two RNCs here in Washington, side by side. The contrast is instructive.

One, the Republican National Committee, is a clueless self-parody. The other, the (R)ush-(N)ewt-(C)heney tag team, is providing the real muscle as the Republican right begins to build traction in taking on President Obama and the Democrats.

The official RNC just spent the last two days wasting time and inviting ridicule-listening to a listless, empty speech by its chairman, Michael Steele, and debating the grand idea of calling the Democrats “socialists.” Meanwhile,
Rush Limbaugh hammers away at the Democrats and the president on radio every day; Newt Gingrich sarcastically attacks Nancy Pelosi on The Daily Show (and gets laughs for doing so); and Dick Cheney continues his high-profile, Iraq-star media tour…

And our old media in 2002?:

From the WSJ Opinion Archives

by JAMES TARANTO

Tuesday, September 24, 2002 4:04 P.M. EDT

…So who’s this impostor, claiming to be Gore, who delivered a speech yesterday at the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco, in which he delivered what the Associated Press calls “a sweeping indictment of President Bush’s threatened attack on Iraq, calling it a distraction from the war on terrorism that has ‘squandered’ international support for the United States.”

It appears Saddam Hussein has unleashed a new weapon of mass distraction on America, a Gore-like android so realistic it is every bit as lifeless as the real thing. Quoth Robo-Gore…

Reporting on the usual media suspects in Salon in 2002:

Give ’em hell, Al

With a series of fiery speeches, the former vice president recovers his voice, his backbone and his place as the 2004 Democratic front-runner.

[September 28, 2002]

…Not everybody likes the new Al Gore. A Republican National Committee spokesman called him a “hack,” and a sputtering Charles Krauthammer termed his Iraq speech a “disgrace,” while an even more unhinged Michael Kelly denounced it as “dishonest, cheap, low … It was wretched. It was vile. It was contemptible. But I understate.” (Adjust Kelly’s medication now!) On Friday, White House press secretary Ari Fleischer took the same contemptuous line, sneering that “Al Gore changes his stories and his tune so often on so many different issues that it’s not an effective use of time to pay much attention to what he says.” Meanwhile Sen. Joe Lieberman, displaying the same habit of folding under GOP pressure that he did in Florida in 2000, rushed to the president-select’s side: “I’m grateful President Bush wants to do this [invade Iraq], and I don’t question his motives,” Lieberman told reporters.

Lieberman is not the only old friend who turned on Gore. The New Republic also quickly piled on after his Iraq speech. The TNR turnaround is particularly stunning: The magazine fired Michael Kelly for his Gore-bashing in 1997, but now Gore’s old friends at the magazine are smacking him almost as hard as Kelly is. TNR dismissed the San Francisco speech as “a political broadside against a president who Gore no doubt feels occupies a post that he himself deserves. But bitterness is not a policy position. In past moments of foreign policy decision — first the Gulf War, then Bosnia — Al Gore has championed the moral and strategic necessity of American power and thus offered a model for his party. We wish we could say that at this moment of decision he was doing the same.” The unprecedented spectacle of TNR bashing Gore for his reservations about an Iraq war shows the extent to which protecting Israel — publisher Marty Peretz’s first love, even before Al Gore — is the driving force behind the get-Saddam fever. ..

And some not so usual suspects:

Hawking War Guilt

By Jim Sleeper

October 25, 2007

One of the most dispiriting causes of the biggest strategic blunder in American history may be the least understood: from the run-up to the Iraq War in 2002 until at least the 2006 elections, it wasn’t the Rush Limbaughs and Ann Coulters who stampeded the chattering classes and liberal audiences toward our still-unfolding disaster. It was the “best” thinkers, writing in the New York Times Book Review and The New Republic, who cued the orchestra of high-minded opinion to play a medley of half-truths and hosannas in support of the war…

The right keeps trying to rewrite history (it’s in their nature):

Barnes falsely claimed Gore “flipped on Iraq”

August 14, 2006 7:42 pm ET

On the August 12 edition of Fox News’ The Beltway Boys, co-host and Weekly Standard executive editor Fred Barnes falsely claimed that former Vice President Al Gore has “flipped on Iraq.” In fact, as Media Matters for America has noted, Gore has consistently opposed the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.

…Barnes argued that with the defeat of Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman in the August 8 Connecticut Democratic primary, the Democratic Party lost its “last living hawk on national security.” He further stated that while Gore “used to be a hawk,” he has since “flipped on Iraq.” In fact, in a September 2002 speech, Gore made clear his reasons for opposing the United States’ Iraq policy, explaining how his opposition to President Bush’s push for the invasion of Iraq was consistent with his support of the 1991 war against Iraq. He stated that, although “in 1991, I was one of a handful of Democrats in the United States Senate to vote in favor of the resolution endorsing the [first] Persian Gulf War,” and Saddam Hussein’s “Iraq does … pose a serious threat to the stability of the Persian Gulf region,” “I am deeply concerned that the course of action that we are presently embarking upon with respect to Iraq has the potential to seriously damage our ability to win the war against terrorism and to weaken our ability to lead the world in this new century…”

Say it ain’t so, Joe:

The Truth About the War in Iraq and Al Gore

Posted May 8, 2006 | 09:42 PM (EST)

…It is sometimes said that good ideas have many fathers but bad ideas are always orphans. And so it is with the retrospective of the decision to go to war in Iraq. As everyone from the White House and Secretary of Defense to members of Congress and the media engage in revisionist history concerning who said what and who knew what about the decision to invade Iraq, it is important to hold everyone’s feet to the fire. The integrity of our democracy requires it. The American people should demand it. Joe Scarborough, the self-styled straight-talking host of Scarborough Country, contributed to annuals of revisionism last Thursday (May 4, 2006) when he suggested that Al Gore was a Johnny-come-lately in his opposition to the War in Iraq. Nothing could be further from the truth.

The truth is that, on September 23, 2002, in a speech at the Commonwealth Club — long before the invasion of Iraq and before members of Congress voted to give President Bush authority to invade — Vice President Al Gore unequivocally and emphatically stated his opposition to a War in Iraq and set forth a multitude of reasons why…

Never let the facts get in the way of republican memes, talking points, and spin.

Former Vice President Al Gore on former Vice President Dick Cheney:

Al Gore to Dick Cheney: ‘I waited two years’

By ANDY BARR | 5/16/09 7:05 AM EDT 

Al Gore said Friday that fellow former Vice President Dick Cheney has jumped back into the political fray too soon into the new administration’s term.

“I waited two years after I left office to make statements that were critical,” Gore said during an interview on CNN, pointing out that his critiques were focused on “policy.”

“Talk about somebody that shouldn’t be talking about making the country less safe, invading a country that did not attack us and posed no serious threat to us at all,” Gore said of Cheney…

Now, which one of the two won by 543,895 votes in 2000?

Darth Cheney hath spoken…

12 Tuesday May 2009

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Dick Cheney, Robert Gibbs, White House

CBS News – Face the Nation – May 10, 2009 [pdf]

…CHENEY: It’s nice to know that you’re still loved and are invited out in public sometimes.

The reason I’ve been speaking, and in effect what I’ve been doing is responding to press queries such as yours, is because I think the issues that are at stake here are so important. And, in effect, what we’ve seen happen with respect to the Obama administration as they came to power is they have moved to take down a lot of those policies we put in place that kept the nation safe for nearly eight years from a followon terrorist attack like 9/11. Dealing with prisoner interrogation, for example, or the terrorist surveillance program.

They campaigned against these policies across the country, and then they came in now, and they have tried, very hard, to undertake actions that I just fundamentally disagree with.

SCHIEFFER: Well, do you — I mean, should we take that literally? You say that the administration has made this country more vulnerable to attacks here in the homeland.

CHENEY: That’s my belief, based upon the fact, Bob, that we put in place those policies after 9/11. On the morning of 9/12, if you will, there was a great deal we didn’t know about Al Qaida. There was the need to embark upon a new strategy with respect to treating this as a strategic threat to the United States. There was the possibility of Al Qaida terrorists in the midst of one of our own cities with a nuclear weapon or a biological agent.

It was a time of great concern, and we put in place some very good policies, and they worked, for eight years. Now we have an administration that’s come to power that has been critical of the programs, but not only that, there’s been talk about prosecuting the lawyers in the Justice Department who gave us the opinions that we operated in accordance with, or referring them to the Bar Association for disbarment or sanctions of some kind, or possibly cooperating with foreign governments that are interested in trying to prosecute American officials, those same officials who were responsible for defending this nation for the last eight years…

…and the Obama administration speaketh back.

Via Steve Benen at Washington Monthly:

THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary

__________________________________________________________

For Immediate Release                                May 11, 2009

PRESS BRIEFING

BY

PRESS SECRETARY ROBERT GIBBS…

…1:13 P.M. EDT

…Q Thanks, Robert.  Yesterday former Vice President Cheney was again defending some of these harsh interrogation tactics including waterboarding, and something specific he said I wanted to see whether you agree with.  He said that these tactics had “saved thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands of lives.”  Do you think that’s true or false?

MR. GIBBS:  I don’t have — I don’t know what he bases that off of, so I don’t have any genuine reaction to it.

Q    One thing presumably he bases it off would be the CIA memos he’s been asking for.  He says there are CIA memos that would show in fact that hundreds of thousands of lives have been saved and terror attacks have been prevented.  I think it was April 26th you said it would take about three weeks to go through and decide.  We’re getting close to that —

MR. GIBBS:  Let me check —

Q    — where do we stand?

MR. GIBBS:  I’ll check on where that is.  I’ve been struck, Ed, in watching the former President and the former Vice President take markedly different views to their lives post their administration.  I think many have.  And I think the answer that he gave to the future of the Republican Party picking Rush Limbaugh over Colin Powell was an illuminating answer about what you’re going to see going forward.

Q    How so?

MR. GIBBS:  Well, I think that — I think you’ve got a series of ideas and a series of thoughts that in many ways the last election was about and the last election rejected.  I think going forward — they’re essentially going forward by looking backward.  And if the Vice President believes that’s a way of growing and expanding the Republican Party, then we’re happy to leave him to those devices…

[emphasis added]

“…they have moved to take down a lot of those policies we put in place that kept the nation safe for nearly eight years from a followon terrorist attack like 9/11…”

Nothing about anthrax.

Or the August 6, 2001 Presidential Daily Brief:

Transcript of Rice’s 9/11 commission statement

Wednesday, May 19, 2004 Posted: 12:25 AM EDT (0425 GMT)

…BEN-VENISTE: Isn’t it a fact, Dr. Rice, that the August 6 PDB warned against possible attacks in this country? And I ask you whether you recall the title of that PDB?

RICE: I believe the title was, “Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States.”

Now, the…

BEN-VENISTE: Thank you.

RICE: No, Mr. Ben-Veniste…

BEN-VENISTE: I will get into the…

RICE: I would like to finish my point here.

BEN-VENISTE: I didn’t know there was a point.

RICE: Given that — you asked me whether or not it warned of attacks.

BEN-VENISTE: I asked you what the title was…

Or their lies to rush us into war in Iraq.

I don’t know about you Darth Cheney, but since January 20, 2009 I’ve been feeling a whole lot better. Because after eight years of Cheney and his minions (Peggy Noonan!), the real adults are in charge.

← Older posts

Recent Posts

  • Droning on…again
  • It is all about the oil…for China?
  • Fixed it for us
  • Campaign Finance: more than enough, always
  • Mark Alford (r): passing gas

Recent Comments

The price we all pay… on “Up, Up and Away……
HB 2075: Who checks?… on Hey Brandon Phelps (r), we hea…
Campaign Finance: a… on Campaign Finance: Working Peop…
The mail pieces have… on Are you certain it wasn’…
In our town | Show M… on ICE Whistles

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,033,435 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

 

Loading Comments...