• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Tag Archives: al gore

I’m gonna have to get another brick

09 Wednesday Nov 2016

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

al gore, brick, Hillary Clinton, popular vote

After the 2000 election the downtown Warrensburg business group held a promotion selling bricks with personal/commemorative “engraving” to be installed in the sidewalks for a beautification project. I plunked down the bucks and selected my text. Some right wingnut busybody complained about my brick. The original placement, near the front entrance of the then location of the regional library branch, was then changed to the east side of the county justice center. The brick has been there ever since.

Brick: Al Gore won in 2000 by 543,895 votes

Brick: Al Gore won in 2000 by 543,895 votes

As of this writing Hillary Clinton is up by over 200,000 votes in the popular vote. So much for a mandate, eh.

I’ve got to get another brick.

We remember

13 Tuesday Sep 2016

Posted by Michael Bersin in media criticism, meta, social media

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

al gore, Hillary Clinton, media criticism, meta, social media, Twitter

Apparently America’s media elite and gatekeepers of all that is sacred in inside the beltway conventional wisdom are upset that Hillary Clinton (D) has pneumonia and didn’t personally speed dial them immediately to deliver the news. Donald Trump’s (r) absent tax returns are no big deal.

I remember the 2000 election. Thought we’d forget all about it, huh, Ceci? Not a chance.

Years ago I was working a legislative reelection campaign for one of the genuinely nicest, most gracious and hard working individuals I have ever met in politics. At one point late in the very tough, stressful, and nasty campaign the silence of some previous supporters came up in a discussion. The candidate turned to me and said, with an uncharecteristically hard look, “I have a long memory.” My blood ran cold.

I, too, have a long memory.

America’s failed media experiment is why this blog exists.

The village, via Twitter:

sirota091216

David Sirota ‏@davidsirota
Twitter is now just an unending stream of Dem operatives, Dem pundits & Clinton think tank folk berating journos for scrutinizing Clinton
10:39 AM – 12 Sep 2016

David Sirota has a point there. I mean, if they don’t scrutinize how many bottles of water Hillary Clinton drinks, who will?

bersinsirota091216

Michael Bersin ‏@MBersin
@davidsirota Yeah, for the good old days before social media when old media could gang up on Al Gore without consequence.
11:14 AM – 12 Sep 2016

And…

David Axelrod (2014 file photo).

David Axelrod (2014 file photo).

….feeding the inside the beltway conventional wisdom, from someone who should know better:

axelrod091216

David Axelrod ‏@davidaxelrod
Antibiotics can take care of pneumonia. What’s the cure for an unhealthy penchant for privacy that repeatedly creates unnecessary problems?
7:20 AM – 12 Sep 2016

Because in an some people’s alternate reality our media actually covers relevant news stories effectively?

bersinaxelrod091216

Michael Bersin ‏@MBersin
@davidaxelrod Pretending the last 24 years of media chasing any shiny bauble never happened? Just speculating,would be irresponsible not to.
9:05 AM – 12 Sep 2016

We’re doomed.

Previously:

Media narrative? What media narrative? (September 10, 2016)

Do your damn homework, Dave

10 Thursday Dec 2015

Posted by Michael Bersin in media criticism

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

al gore, dave Helling, Internet, Kansas City Star, our failed media experiment

A throw away line in a “both sides do it” article from Dave Helling in the Kansas City Star:

December 9, 2015
Misleading politics may hit an unprecedented high in 2016, pundits say

….Republicans also point to Hillary Clinton’s statements about her role in the killings in Benghazi, her emails or Al Gore’s claims about his involvement in the early Internet as evidence that Democratic candidates routinely lie and exaggerate too….

Really, citing republican political spin as evidence?

This is what then Vice President Al Gore (D) actually said about the Internet in 1999:

Transcript: Vice President Gore on CNN’s ‘Late Edition’
March 9, 1999 Web posted at: 5:06 p.m. EST (2206 GMT)

[….] BLITZER: I want to get to some of the substance of domestic and international issues in a minute, but let’s just wrap up a little bit of the politics right now.

Why should Democrats, looking at the Democratic nomination process, support you instead of Bill Bradley, a friend of yours, a former colleague in the Senate? What do you have to bring to this that he doesn’t necessarily bring to this process?

GORE: Well, I will be offering — I’ll be offering my vision when my campaign begins. And it will be comprehensive and sweeping. And I hope that it will be compelling enough to draw people toward it. I feel that it will be.

But it will emerge from my dialogue with the American people. I’ve traveled to every part of this country during the last six years. During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet. I took the initiative in moving forward a whole range of initiatives that have proven to be important to our country’s economic growth and environmental protection, improvements in our educational system.

During a quarter century of public service, including most of it long before I came into my current job, I have worked to try to improve the quality of life in our country and in our world. And what I’ve seen during that experience is an emerging future that’s very exciting, about which I’m very optimistic, and toward which I want to lead. [….]

[emphasis added]

Over a year later:

Thursday, Oct 5, 2000 02:33 PM CDT
Did Gore invent the Internet?
Actually, the vice president never claimed to have done so — but he did help the Net along. Some people would rather forget that.
Scott Rosenberg

….It took social engineers as well as software engineers to build the Net. And that may be why the response to Gore’s original statement was so savage: Not because his claim was a lie, but because it was a truth that a lot of people today are trying to forget or bury….

From The Internets Gods (in 2000):

Al Gore and the Internet
By Robert Kahn and Vinton Cerf

Al Gore was the first political leader to recognize the importance of the Internet and to promote and support its development.

No one person or even small group of persons exclusively “invented” the Internet. It is the result of many years of ongoing collaboration among people in government and the university community. But as the two people who designed the basic architecture and the core protocols that make the Internet work, we would like to acknowledge VP Gore’s contributions as a Congressman, Senator and as Vice President. No other elected official, to our knowledge, has made a greater contribution over a longer period of time.

Last year the Vice President made a straightforward statement on his role. He said: “During my service in the United States Congress I took the initiative in creating the Internet.” We don’t think, as some people have argued, that Gore intended to claim he “invented” the Internet. Moreover, there is no question in our minds that while serving as Senator, Gore’s initiatives had a significant and beneficial effect on the still-evolving Internet. The fact of the matter is that Gore was talking about and promoting the Internet long before most people were listening. We feel it is timely to offer our perspective.

As far back as the 1970s Congressman Gore promoted the idea of high speed telecommunications as an engine for both economic growth and the improvement of our educational system. He was the first elected official to grasp the potential of computer communications to have a broader impact than just improving the conduct of science and scholarship. Though easily forgotten, now, at the time this was an unproven and controversial concept. Our work on the Internet started in 1973 and was based on even earlier work that took place in the mid-late 1960s. But the Internet, as we know it today, was not deployed until 1983. When the Internet was still in the early stages of its deployment, Congressman Gore provided intellectual leadership by helping create the vision of the potential benefits of high speed computing and communication. As an example, he sponsored hearings on how advanced technologies might be put to use in areas like coordinating the response of government agencies to natural disasters and other crises.

As a Senator in the 1980s Gore urged government agencies to consolidate what at the time were several dozen different and unconnected networks into an “Interagency Network.” Working in a bi-partisan manner with officials in Ronald Reagan and George Bush’s administrations, Gore secured the passage of the High Performance Computing and Communications Act in 1991. This “Gore Act” supported the National Research and Education Network (NREN) initiative that became one of the major vehicles for the spread of the Internet beyond the field of computer science.

As Vice President Gore promoted building the Internet both up and out, as well as releasing the Internet from the control of the government agencies that spawned it. He served as the major administration proponent for continued investment in advanced computing and networking and private sector initiatives such as Net Day. He was and is a strong proponent of extending access to the network to schools and libraries. Today, approximately 95% of our nation’s schools are on the Internet. Gore provided much-needed political support for the speedy privatization of the
Internet when the time arrived for it to become a commercially-driven operation.

There are many factors that have contributed to the Internet’s rapid growth since the later 1980s, not the least of which has been political support for its privatization and continued support for research in advanced networking technology. No one in public life has been more intellectually engaged in helping to create the climate for a thriving Internet than the Vice President. Gore has been a clear champion of this effort, both in the councils of government and with the public at large.

The Vice President deserves credit for his early recognition of the value of high speed computing and communication and for his long-term and consistent articulation of the potential value of the Internet to American citizens and industry and, indeed, to the rest of the world.

So, a Libertarian (they don’t believe government does anything, even though it does) writer posted a story (you can look it up) and subsequently republican politicians and operatives spun the media to create a convenient narrative that our lazy old media bought hook, line and sinker in 2000. Dave Helling shows us that the zombie lie still lives today.

These things are easy enough to check out. We understand you can even use the Internet. It took us less than five minutes.

* In the interest of full disclosure, I was a delegate from Missouri for Al Gore at the 2000 Democratic National Convention in Los Angeles. As if that makes any difference.

It was the Supreme Court, Stupid.

25 Tuesday Jun 2013

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

al gore, George W. Bush, Ralph Nader, Supreme Court, Voting Rights Act

Previously:

Throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm (June 25, 2013)

This morning the U.S. Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act.

Thanks for worse than nothing, Ralph.

We knew the stakes thirteen years ago. And the consequences have certainly come home to roost, 5-4, today.

A t-shirt distributed by NARAL to delegates at the Democratic National Convention in Los Angeles in 2000.

Today Among People Who Wear Robes:

…I don’t mind, as Mr. Dooley sagely observed, that the Supreme Court follows the election returns, but I’d like some indication that any of them read a newspaper any time in the past two years. And, as Lemieux points out, thanks again, Ralph…

St. Ralph Speaks!:

The man who made Iraq, massive upper-class tax cuts and Sam Alito possible, while reassuring us all the while that a man who governed to the right of the Texas legislature was a harmless moderate indistinguishable from Al Gore, would like to share some insights into American politics…

Roberts To Black Folks (and/or Democrats): Don’t Bother Trying To Vote (in the comments):

When people talk about the injustice of Bush v. Gore, they normally go on to say it brought us the tangible horrors of the Bush administration – the Iraq war, above all. But it might be time to note this is the most pernicious and lasting legacy of the decision: allowing two young/far-right justices to be appointed and form a tenuous but all-powerful majority for decisions like this….

It might be time? It has been for a long time.

Besides, Al Gore is fat.

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): Al Gore is fat

03 Friday May 2013

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

4th Congressional District, al gore, climate, missouri, snow, Vicky Hartzler, weather

Yes, it’s been snowing.

Yesterday, via Twitter:

Rep. Vicky Hartzler ‏@RepHartzler

Well, it looks like we won’t get in the fields again this week due to more rain….and snow!? This global warming is crazy! 3:09 PM – 2 May 13

Uh, there’s a difference between climate and weather:

Climate change is real.

We know the planet is warming by reviewing the historical record of temperatures taken around the world, in the oceans and even by satellite….

While some skeptics may point out minor downturns in temperature or extra cold storms as proof that warming is not occurring, the long term trend is clear.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) published a report in July of 2010 that looked at 10 key climate indicators that all point to the same finding, the evidence that our world is warming is unmistakable.

The NOAA report emphasized that humans have developed for thousands of years under one climatic state and now a new set of climatic conditions are taking shape which are consistently warmer with some areas likely to see more extreme events like severe drought, torrential rain and violent storms….

In addition, 34 national science academies around the world have made formal declarations since 2001 confirming global warming and urging reduction of greenhouse gases.

[….]

Science, it’s not for public policy anymore.

Al Gore explains snow storms to Bill O'Reilly

03 Thursday Feb 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

al gore, Bill O'Reilly, climate change, ice storms, missouri, snow storms

On the night of November 30/December 1, 2006, my husband and I lay in bed listening to ice crash from the roofs of the nearby houses. It had simply gotten too thick and heavy to resist gravity. Since the power lines in our neighborhood run through the woods behind our houses, we lost power of course. For a week. That’s not like losing it in the summer–which we had done the previous July for nine days. At least in the summer, it stays light later. It was so depressing in the evenings.

So I dreaded–assumed we were in for–another miserable week or more with this last storm. Didn’t happen. The den is warm, the lights are bright, and I just cooked dinner on our electric stove. Owing to the vagaries of winter storms coming from the South, the forecast was wrong. Mercifully. We got more sleet than freezing rain, so there were few power outages. We will have to take steps, though, because winter storms like this week’s are going to be more common.

Bill O’Reilly didn’t understand why climate change would mean more snow and ice storms, but Al Gore explained it to him.

Last week on his show Bill O’Reilly asked, “Why has southern New York turned into the tundra?” and then said he had a call in to me. I appreciate the question.

As it turns out, the scientific community has been addressing this particular question for some time now and they say that increased heavy snowfalls are completely consistent with what they have been predicting as a consequence of man-made global warming:

“In fact, scientists have been warning for at least two decades that global warming could make snowstorms more severe. Snow has two simple ingredients: cold and moisture. Warmer air collects moisture like a sponge until it hits a patch of cold air. When temperatures dip below freezing, a lot of moisture creates a lot of snow.”

“A rise in global temperature can create all sorts of havoc, ranging from hotter dry spells to colder winters, along with increasingly violent storms, flooding, forest fires and loss of endangered species.”

Whether O’Reilly gets it now, I couldn’t say. But I plan to look into a gas insert for our fireplace.

January 2001 to January 2009 in a nutshell

03 Thursday Jun 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

al gore, dubya, George W. Bush, Internet, Jamil Smith, meta, Twitter

We are not worthy. Jamil Smith, via Twitter, sums up the eight years of dubya’s reign in only six words:

Try not to ruin them, too. • RT @George_WBush: I’m now on Twitter & Facebook.    about 4 hours ago  via Twitter for iPhone  

[emphasis added]

You’ve got to believe that right wingnuttia just detests the wide dissemination of public speech made possible by this Internets thing. You know, that technological entity that Al Gore took the initiative to promote as a legislator.  

Al and Tipper Gore

02 Wednesday Jun 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

2000, al gore, Democratic National Convention, Los Angeles, Tipper Gore

Al and Tipper Gore have announced their separation after 40 years of marriage.

Yeah, I was there for the kiss, but I didn’t get a photo. It was still going to be a few more years before I acquired a digital camera. The photos I did manage to get from the Missouri delegation (seated front and center, right behind Tennessee) came from a compact 35 mm job that was supposed to be idiot proof. That is until the back of the camera opened in security and exposed an entire roll of film.

Yes, that’s Al Gore at the podium.

Yes, I was there, live, for the kiss, along with twenty something thousand other people.

It’s interesting that today almost everyone in the media has been replaying that kiss from ten years ago. As if those ten years haven’t passed and the kiss has no meaning because of today’s announcement.

I was standing on my chair, continually harassed by the safety people to not do so while everyone else was doing the same thing during Al Gore’s speech, and I turned toward the New Mexico delegation to photograph the crowd. I snapped this picture as I started to fall. It turns out there was a reason the safety people didn’t want us standing on the chairs.

I sometimes wonder if the past ten years have been a nightmare alternate reality. I wonder what things would have been like if December 12, 2000 had turned out differently.

Fiddling while California burns

17 Thursday Dec 2009

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

al gore, climate change, Copenhagen, Repower America

“…I will ask those among my fellow citizens who share my sense of urgency to join in asking President Obama and the leadership of the United States Senate to set a deadline of April 22, 2010 — the 40th anniversary of Earth Day — for final action of US legislation.”

God love him, Al Gore just keeps on ticking like an old Timex watch.  The more the fossil fuel flunkies dump on him, the stronger his message gets. According to his citizen action group polls show that the majority of Americans recognize the need for climate protection despite the insane blatherings of the likes of S. Palin, the Washington Times and Sen. James “save our oil” Inhofe.  

Knowing that it will have to be the younger generation that forces us to wake up and smell the roses before they disappear, I am giving my 20-year-old granddaughter Al Gore’s book for Christmas (after I take notes from it !)

On page 189, there’s a photo of pine trees in Colorado that are dead and dying because the winters have not been cold enough to kill off the mountain pine beetle larvae. More than 600,000 acres of forest are now more brown than green. When my husband and I checked into a hotel in Winter Park last summer, the clerk handed us a flyer explaining and apologizing for the ugly destruction of Colorado forests.

Who is going to apologize to the millions of human beings being displaced by rising sea levels and destructive storms?  How can anyone deny what thousands of scientists all over the world know and continue to learn about the future of our planet if we don’t jam the brakes on carbon dioxide and other dangerous emissions?

I’ve purchased several copies of the National Geographic Special, Six Degrees Could Change the World and am lending them out, showing them to small groups at libraries, and giving them as gifts to teachers.  

Most of us can’t remember the facts, statistics, etc., but no one can watch this film and forget the images of fires in Australia, dusty cattle ranches in Nebraska and ocean waves swallowing up Wall Street (gives a whole new meaning to “bail out,” doesn’t it?)

I don’t for a minute think I’m going to stop global warming, but I’m sure as hell not going down without a fight.

A Tale of Two Vice Presidents: Al Gore 2002 – Dick Cheney 2009

25 Monday May 2009

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

al gore, Dick Cheney, media criticism

In September 2002, after almost two years out of office, former Vice President Al Gore publicly criticized the Bush administration’s rush to war with Iraq in a speech in San Francisco:

Al Gore – September 23, 2002

IRAQ AND THE WAR ON TERRORISM

Al Gore

Former U.S. Vice President

…Moreover, President Bush is demanding in this high political season that Congress speedily affirm that he has the necessary authority to proceed immediately against Iraq and, for that matter, under the language of his resolution, against any other nation in the region, regardless of subsequent developments or emerging circumstances. Now, the timing of this sudden burst of urgency to immediately take up this new cause as America’s new top priority, displacing our former top priority, the war against Osama Bin Laden, was explained innocently by the White House chief of staff in his now well-known statement that “From a marketing point of view, you don’t introduce new products in August…”

After being out of office and power for a fraction of that time former Vice President Dick Cheney has been speaking out against the policies of the Obama administration:

Posted on Thursday, May 21, 2009

Cheney’s speech ignored some inconvenient truths

By Jonathan S. Landay and Warren P. Strobel | McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON – Former Vice President Dick Cheney’s defense Thursday of the Bush administration’s policies for interrogating suspected terrorists contained omissions, exaggerations and misstatements.

In his address to the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative policy organization in Washington, Cheney said that the techniques the Bush administration approved, including waterboarding – simulated drowning that’s considered a form of torture – forced nakedness and sleep deprivation, were “legal” and produced information that “prevented the violent death of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of innocent people…”

Evidently some of the media aren’t as worshipful as he’d like, but he does get access. Why would Dick do this?:

Dick Cheney: Why So Chatty All of a Sudden?

By Michael Duffy / WASHINGTON Wednesday, May. 13, 2009

…A more likely explanation is that Cheney, who championed the idea of preemptive-attack doctrine as Vice President, knows that in politics as well the best defense is often a good offense. With the White House decision to release various Bush-era memos on interrogation, and the coming disclosure of thousands more photographs from Abu Ghraib later this month, Cheney is “trying to rewrite history,” says a Republican consultant who has experience in intelligence matters. “He knows that as time goes by, he will look worse. And so he’s trying to put his stroke on it…

Well yeah, those photos haven’t been released yet. But they will be.

A good portion of the media coverage of Al Gore’s dissent in 2002 was less then deferential, including republican talking points in their coverage:

Gore challenges Bush Iraqi policy

Questions the timing of a military strike

From John Mercurio

CNN Washington Bureau

Tuesday, September 24, 2002 Posted: 3:38 PM EDT (1938 GMT)

…Republicans were quick to dismiss Gore’s remarks as overtly political.

“It seemed to be a speech more appropriate for a political hack than a presidential candidate by someone who clearly fails to recognize leadership. It was a contradiction within a contradiction,” said RNC spokeswoman Tracey Schmitt…

Updated 9/24/2002 3:56 AM

Gore blasts Bush on Iraq war

By Susan Page and Richard Benedetto, USA TODAY

…Asked to respond, White House spokesman Scott McClellan said, “The president has united America and America has rallied behind the call for action, and he will continue to lead and unify even if splits begin to emerge within the Democratic party and its presidential candidates.”

Republican National Committee spokesman Jim Dyke dismissed Gore’s speech as crafted “for a political hack.” He said Gore “may be serving a political purpose in appeasing a certain segment of the Democrat party that wants to use this type of rhetoric…”

In 2009 the White House has been a little more circumspect:

THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary

__________________________________________________

For Immediate Release                   May 22, 2009

 

PRESS BRIEFING

BY

PRESS SECRETARY ROBERT GIBBS

James S. Brady Press Briefing Room

12:23 P.M. EDT

…Q : About the great debate yesterday, how does the President feel about having Cheney speaking on the same day? In a way is he pleased to have these speeches in such sharp relief that it gave the public a chance to say, okay, here’s column A, here’s column B, and to compare it? And also, how does the President feel about the propriety of a Vice President who just only recently left office speaking out? President Bush said he was not going to for a while. Presidents usually keep pretty quiet that first year after leaving office. Are there different rules for Vice Presidents? What are your thoughts?

MR. GIBBS: The second one is a good question. I don’t know what the rules are. I mean, obviously, anybody is free to speak. I think many, as well as you, have noted that the President and the Vice President have taken different tacks since leaving office about what they’re going to do and what they’re going to say. As I said yesterday, watching Vice President Cheney appears as if he’s extending an argument that my sense was had inside these walls for many years during the administration which he served as Vice President.

I think the President — in terms of yesterday’s speeches side by side I think the President is not going to shy away from the debate on these issues. I think that was evident yesterday, and I think he always thinks it’s helpful for the American people to be able to see, as you said, side by side, what the competing debate and narratives are. I don’t think that’s anything he’s going to shy away from.

I think both would understand that these are complex issues, big decisions that have to be made, that the President is going to do all in his power to keep the American people safe. But he is strongly committed to the notion that we’re going to change the way we conduct our foreign policy.

Q:  And he sees nothing inappropriate in what the former Vice President —

MR. GIBBS: I mean, you know, I think the President would leave it up to the Vice President as to determine what he wants to do…

And our old media considers Dick Cheney a “star”:

Howard Fineman

Meet the Real RNC

Ignore the party, Rush, Newt and Cheney are the muscle

May 20, 2009 | Updated: 9:14  p.m. ET May 20, 2009

…Right now there are two RNCs here in Washington, side by side. The contrast is instructive.

One, the Republican National Committee, is a clueless self-parody. The other, the (R)ush-(N)ewt-(C)heney tag team, is providing the real muscle as the Republican right begins to build traction in taking on President Obama and the Democrats.

The official RNC just spent the last two days wasting time and inviting ridicule-listening to a listless, empty speech by its chairman, Michael Steele, and debating the grand idea of calling the Democrats “socialists.” Meanwhile,
Rush Limbaugh hammers away at the Democrats and the president on radio every day; Newt Gingrich sarcastically attacks Nancy Pelosi on The Daily Show (and gets laughs for doing so); and Dick Cheney continues his high-profile, Iraq-star media tour…

And our old media in 2002?:

From the WSJ Opinion Archives

by JAMES TARANTO

Tuesday, September 24, 2002 4:04 P.M. EDT

…So who’s this impostor, claiming to be Gore, who delivered a speech yesterday at the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco, in which he delivered what the Associated Press calls “a sweeping indictment of President Bush’s threatened attack on Iraq, calling it a distraction from the war on terrorism that has ‘squandered’ international support for the United States.”

It appears Saddam Hussein has unleashed a new weapon of mass distraction on America, a Gore-like android so realistic it is every bit as lifeless as the real thing. Quoth Robo-Gore…

Reporting on the usual media suspects in Salon in 2002:

Give ’em hell, Al

With a series of fiery speeches, the former vice president recovers his voice, his backbone and his place as the 2004 Democratic front-runner.

[September 28, 2002]

…Not everybody likes the new Al Gore. A Republican National Committee spokesman called him a “hack,” and a sputtering Charles Krauthammer termed his Iraq speech a “disgrace,” while an even more unhinged Michael Kelly denounced it as “dishonest, cheap, low … It was wretched. It was vile. It was contemptible. But I understate.” (Adjust Kelly’s medication now!) On Friday, White House press secretary Ari Fleischer took the same contemptuous line, sneering that “Al Gore changes his stories and his tune so often on so many different issues that it’s not an effective use of time to pay much attention to what he says.” Meanwhile Sen. Joe Lieberman, displaying the same habit of folding under GOP pressure that he did in Florida in 2000, rushed to the president-select’s side: “I’m grateful President Bush wants to do this [invade Iraq], and I don’t question his motives,” Lieberman told reporters.

Lieberman is not the only old friend who turned on Gore. The New Republic also quickly piled on after his Iraq speech. The TNR turnaround is particularly stunning: The magazine fired Michael Kelly for his Gore-bashing in 1997, but now Gore’s old friends at the magazine are smacking him almost as hard as Kelly is. TNR dismissed the San Francisco speech as “a political broadside against a president who Gore no doubt feels occupies a post that he himself deserves. But bitterness is not a policy position. In past moments of foreign policy decision — first the Gulf War, then Bosnia — Al Gore has championed the moral and strategic necessity of American power and thus offered a model for his party. We wish we could say that at this moment of decision he was doing the same.” The unprecedented spectacle of TNR bashing Gore for his reservations about an Iraq war shows the extent to which protecting Israel — publisher Marty Peretz’s first love, even before Al Gore — is the driving force behind the get-Saddam fever. ..

And some not so usual suspects:

Hawking War Guilt

By Jim Sleeper

October 25, 2007

One of the most dispiriting causes of the biggest strategic blunder in American history may be the least understood: from the run-up to the Iraq War in 2002 until at least the 2006 elections, it wasn’t the Rush Limbaughs and Ann Coulters who stampeded the chattering classes and liberal audiences toward our still-unfolding disaster. It was the “best” thinkers, writing in the New York Times Book Review and The New Republic, who cued the orchestra of high-minded opinion to play a medley of half-truths and hosannas in support of the war…

The right keeps trying to rewrite history (it’s in their nature):

Barnes falsely claimed Gore “flipped on Iraq”

August 14, 2006 7:42 pm ET

On the August 12 edition of Fox News’ The Beltway Boys, co-host and Weekly Standard executive editor Fred Barnes falsely claimed that former Vice President Al Gore has “flipped on Iraq.” In fact, as Media Matters for America has noted, Gore has consistently opposed the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.

…Barnes argued that with the defeat of Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman in the August 8 Connecticut Democratic primary, the Democratic Party lost its “last living hawk on national security.” He further stated that while Gore “used to be a hawk,” he has since “flipped on Iraq.” In fact, in a September 2002 speech, Gore made clear his reasons for opposing the United States’ Iraq policy, explaining how his opposition to President Bush’s push for the invasion of Iraq was consistent with his support of the 1991 war against Iraq. He stated that, although “in 1991, I was one of a handful of Democrats in the United States Senate to vote in favor of the resolution endorsing the [first] Persian Gulf War,” and Saddam Hussein’s “Iraq does … pose a serious threat to the stability of the Persian Gulf region,” “I am deeply concerned that the course of action that we are presently embarking upon with respect to Iraq has the potential to seriously damage our ability to win the war against terrorism and to weaken our ability to lead the world in this new century…”

Say it ain’t so, Joe:

The Truth About the War in Iraq and Al Gore

Posted May 8, 2006 | 09:42 PM (EST)

…It is sometimes said that good ideas have many fathers but bad ideas are always orphans. And so it is with the retrospective of the decision to go to war in Iraq. As everyone from the White House and Secretary of Defense to members of Congress and the media engage in revisionist history concerning who said what and who knew what about the decision to invade Iraq, it is important to hold everyone’s feet to the fire. The integrity of our democracy requires it. The American people should demand it. Joe Scarborough, the self-styled straight-talking host of Scarborough Country, contributed to annuals of revisionism last Thursday (May 4, 2006) when he suggested that Al Gore was a Johnny-come-lately in his opposition to the War in Iraq. Nothing could be further from the truth.

The truth is that, on September 23, 2002, in a speech at the Commonwealth Club — long before the invasion of Iraq and before members of Congress voted to give President Bush authority to invade — Vice President Al Gore unequivocally and emphatically stated his opposition to a War in Iraq and set forth a multitude of reasons why…

Never let the facts get in the way of republican memes, talking points, and spin.

Former Vice President Al Gore on former Vice President Dick Cheney:

Al Gore to Dick Cheney: ‘I waited two years’

By ANDY BARR | 5/16/09 7:05 AM EDT 

Al Gore said Friday that fellow former Vice President Dick Cheney has jumped back into the political fray too soon into the new administration’s term.

“I waited two years after I left office to make statements that were critical,” Gore said during an interview on CNN, pointing out that his critiques were focused on “policy.”

“Talk about somebody that shouldn’t be talking about making the country less safe, invading a country that did not attack us and posed no serious threat to us at all,” Gore said of Cheney…

Now, which one of the two won by 543,895 votes in 2000?

← Older posts

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Democratic Party News
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Josh Hawley
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 641,554 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

 

Loading Comments...