Previously:

Senator Kit Bond (r): “Apologize, who me?”

Senator Kit Bond (r): “Respect my @&%$in’ authoritayyy!”

At Thursday’s White House press briefing Robert Gibbs took a question about Senator Kit Bond’s (r) continuing temper tantrum over briefings concerning the underwear bomber. The White House is not curling up in the corner and saying, “Please. Don’t. Hurt. Me.” on this one:

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release

February 11, 2010

Briefing by White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs and CEA Chair Christina Romer, 2/11/10

James S. Brady Press Briefing Room

….1:05 P.M. EST

….Q    Senator Bond accused the White House of using JohnmBrennan for political purposes, saying that he was being — doing the role, your role.  This economic report —

MR. GIBBS:  Let me just address that.  Let’s understand this:  John Brennan has been working in counterterrorism for more than 25 years — right?  First as a CIA agent hired by President George W. Bush to work at the CIA, and then to stand up the National Counterterrorism Center.  Okay?  We asked him to stay on.  I don’t have the slightest idea what political party John Brennan is a member of.  I’ve never had a political conversation with John.  I know this:  John is there each and every day working in his office to try to do everything he can to keep the American people safe.

And I would suggest, whether it’s to Senator Bond or others on Capitol Hill, that these are decisions best left to people that have an understanding of counterterrorism, experience in counterterrorism and law enforcement, rather than to politicians on Capitol Hill.

Q    But his specific accusation was that he was being used in a way that a press secretary is supposed to — I mean, that he was enunciating Obama’s policy.

MR. GIBBS:  I think Kit Bond didn’t — I don’t think Kit Bond liked to hear what he already knew, which was he’d been told that Abdulmutallab was in FBI custody after what happened on Christmas Day.

Now, I’ll let you, Jonathan, ask Kit Bond whether he understands the protocols of how the FBI deals with suspects enough to understand that at that point it would have been obvious he would have been read his Miranda rights.  I don’t know whether Kit Bond was confused or whether he just doesn’t want to admit the facts….

[emphasis added]

I vote for “C”, both of the above.

CBS News – Face the Nation – May 10, 2009 [pdf]

…CHENEY: It’s nice to know that you’re still loved and are invited out in public sometimes.

The reason I’ve been speaking, and in effect what I’ve been doing is responding to press queries such as yours, is because I think the issues that are at stake here are so important. And, in effect, what we’ve seen happen with respect to the Obama administration as they came to power is they have moved to take down a lot of those policies we put in place that kept the nation safe for nearly eight years from a followon terrorist attack like 9/11. Dealing with prisoner interrogation, for example, or the terrorist surveillance program.

They campaigned against these policies across the country, and then they came in now, and they have tried, very hard, to undertake actions that I just fundamentally disagree with.

SCHIEFFER: Well, do you — I mean, should we take that literally? You say that the administration has made this country more vulnerable to attacks here in the homeland.

CHENEY: That’s my belief, based upon the fact, Bob, that we put in place those policies after 9/11. On the morning of 9/12, if you will, there was a great deal we didn’t know about Al Qaida. There was the need to embark upon a new strategy with respect to treating this as a strategic threat to the United States. There was the possibility of Al Qaida terrorists in the midst of one of our own cities with a nuclear weapon or a biological agent.

It was a time of great concern, and we put in place some very good policies, and they worked, for eight years. Now we have an administration that’s come to power that has been critical of the programs, but not only that, there’s been talk about prosecuting the lawyers in the Justice Department who gave us the opinions that we operated in accordance with, or referring them to the Bar Association for disbarment or sanctions of some kind, or possibly cooperating with foreign governments that are interested in trying to prosecute American officials, those same officials who were responsible for defending this nation for the last eight years…

…and the Obama administration speaketh back.

Via Steve Benen at Washington Monthly:

THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary

__________________________________________________________

For Immediate Release                                May 11, 2009

PRESS BRIEFING

BY

PRESS SECRETARY ROBERT GIBBS…

…1:13 P.M. EDT

…Q Thanks, Robert.  Yesterday former Vice President Cheney was again defending some of these harsh interrogation tactics including waterboarding, and something specific he said I wanted to see whether you agree with.  He said that these tactics had “saved thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands of lives.”  Do you think that’s true or false?

MR. GIBBS:  I don’t have — I don’t know what he bases that off of, so I don’t have any genuine reaction to it.

Q    One thing presumably he bases it off would be the CIA memos he’s been asking for.  He says there are CIA memos that would show in fact that hundreds of thousands of lives have been saved and terror attacks have been prevented.  I think it was April 26th you said it would take about three weeks to go through and decide.  We’re getting close to that —

MR. GIBBS:  Let me check —

Q    — where do we stand?

MR. GIBBS:  I’ll check on where that is.  I’ve been struck, Ed, in watching the former President and the former Vice President take markedly different views to their lives post their administration.  I think many have.  And I think the answer that he gave to the future of the Republican Party picking Rush Limbaugh over Colin Powell was an illuminating answer about what you’re going to see going forward.

Q    How so?

MR. GIBBS:  Well, I think that — I think you’ve got a series of ideas and a series of thoughts that in many ways the last election was about and the last election rejected.  I think going forward — they’re essentially going forward by looking backward.  And if the Vice President believes that’s a way of growing and expanding the Republican Party, then we’re happy to leave him to those devices…

[emphasis added]

“…they have moved to take down a lot of those policies we put in place that kept the nation safe for nearly eight years from a followon terrorist attack like 9/11…”

Nothing about anthrax.

Or the August 6, 2001 Presidential Daily Brief:

Transcript of Rice’s 9/11 commission statement

Wednesday, May 19, 2004 Posted: 12:25 AM EDT (0425 GMT)

…BEN-VENISTE: Isn’t it a fact, Dr. Rice, that the August 6 PDB warned against possible attacks in this country? And I ask you whether you recall the title of that PDB?

RICE: I believe the title was, “Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States.”

Now, the…

BEN-VENISTE: Thank you.

RICE: No, Mr. Ben-Veniste…

BEN-VENISTE: I will get into the…

RICE: I would like to finish my point here.

BEN-VENISTE: I didn’t know there was a point.

RICE: Given that — you asked me whether or not it warned of attacks.

BEN-VENISTE: I asked you what the title was…

Or their lies to rush us into war in Iraq.

I don’t know about you Darth Cheney, but since January 20, 2009 I’ve been feeling a whole lot better. Because after eight years of Cheney and his minions (Peggy Noonan!), the real adults are in charge.