• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Tag Archives: speech

What a dumbass

17 Wednesday Dec 2025

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

25th Amendment, Donald Trump, dumbass, Fascist pig, speech, WTF?

Bad combover. Check. Too long red tie. Check. Orange spray tan. Check. Tiny hands. Check. Cluelessness. Check…

He’s that stupid, or he think’s everyone else is that stupid, or both.

A few of the reactions:

Connie Schultz ‪@connieschultz.bsky.social‬

Yelling, lying; yelling, lying; yelling, lying. So inspiring.

8:17 PM · Dec 17, 2025

Ron Filipkowski ‪@ronfilipkowski.bsky.social

So every time Trump claims he has a major primetime announcement the networks will give him free live airtime to give a MAGA rally speech?

8:31 PM · Dec 17, 2025

David Rothkopf ‪@djrothkopf.bsky.social‬

A Christmas message with all the manic energy of one of Hitler’s Nuremberg rallies but none of the nuance or humanity.

8:27 PM · Dec 17, 2025

jamelle ‪@jamellebouie.net‬

very weird feeling watching a seemingly coked out president yell at you for 20 minutes straight

8:20 PM · Dec 17, 2025

Elizabeth Cronise McLaughlin ‪@ecmclaughlin.bsky.social‬

This is a speech by someone who knows he’s losing.

8:05 PM · Dec 17, 2025

Cheryl Rofer ‪@cherylrofer.bsky.social‬

That was all one sentence

8:21 PM · Dec 17, 2025

Heather Cox Richardson (TDPR) ‪@hcrichardson.bsky.social‬

What the absolute [expletive] was that?!?

8:21 PM · Dec 17, 2025

digby ‪@digby56.bsky.social‬

Jesus. When is this crazy diatribe going to end? He’s just projectile vomiting bullshit like a fire hose.

8:19 PM · Dec 17, 2025

Mrs. Betty Bowers ‪@mrsbettybowers.bsky.social‬

Tonight’s shamelessly stupid speech is a reminder that this is true. Donald Trump is monumentally stupid. And he is, clearly, on [sniff] something.
[….]

8:16 PM · Dec 17, 2025

JoJoFromJerz ‪@jojofromjerz.bsky.social‬

Hot take: having an incoherent septuagenarian scream-lecture America like a man arguing with a self-checkout machine that keeps yelling “unexpected item in the bagging area” might not actually be the emotional support animal we need right now.

8:57 PM · Dec 17, 2025

Yeah, WTF?

So, Mark (r), who killed Jesus?

20 Monday May 2024

Posted by Michael Bersin in Congress, Mark Alford, social media

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

4th Congressional District, blood libel, commencement, former newsreader, Mark Alford, missouri, right wingnut, social media, speech

According to the speech Congress voted to criminalize a particular “biblical teaching”?

“…The world around us says that we should keep our beliefs to ourselves whenever they go against the tyranny of diversity, equity, and inclusion. We fear speaking truth, because now, unfortunately, truth is in the minority. Congress just passed a bill where stating something as basic as the biblical teaching of who killed Jesus could land you in jail…”

Which one? How did you vote, Mark (r)?

Mark Alford (r) [2023 file photo].

Mark Alford
[May 18, 2024]
Do not trust the media, and their headlines and synopsis. Listen to the entire speech yourself.
This has opened up a great discussion with my friends and family. We need to be having this discussion all over America, in a calm and loving way, truly listening and understanding one another.
Harrison uses the term “vocation” at least ten times in this speech:
“a particular occupation, business, or profession; calling. Synonyms: pursuit, employment. a strong impulse or inclination to follow a particular activity or career. a divine call to God’s service or to the Christian life.”
God has a plan and purpose for your life. It’s not the same for every person. It’s your job to find out what that is and make it happen.
So I challenge you to listen to the entire speech. Form your own conclusions. Ask yourself why do you feel the way you do? And most importantly what is GOD’S will in your life? What is YOUR vocation?
Please only comment after you’ve invested the time to listen…. Not read the transcript… but listen!!!!
Love you all!!!!
~Mark

You mean, like blood libel?

Some of the responses:

Blood libel. He repeated the blood libel.
Anti Semitic talk and actions on the rise and he digs up 2000 year old lies and repeats the Blood Libel. The first and greatest antisemitic comment of all time. The bases for thousands of years hate towards the Jewish people.
Are you defending his blood libel?

I read the whole speech. Leaving aside our differences of tradition, I would point out that he made an antisemitic remark during the speech. I’m also not too pleased with what seems to be his biblical illiteracy. Anyone who is familiar with Jesus interacting with the Sadducees and Pharisees would know that Jesus was not a fan of people using tradition or politics to narrow the appeal of God. I get that it is now common in certain conservative religious movements, but Matthew 22:34-40 stands as the ultimate commandment. You can judge someone for their dirty feet, but Jesus would wash them without judgment. I believe the faith has been diminishing precisely because so many would spit on Jesus if it meant having to part with the most conservative elements of their politics.

Heard it
‘deliberate lie’ and the whole ‘degenerate’ things didn’t sit well with me….as well as several other of his implications.
Ot apparently with the nuns who sponsor the school.
I have no problem with him using his speech.
I have no problem with those who support or oppose him.
But please don’t pretend that because I don’t see it the way you do that I must not have heard or read the speech…that’s insulting

What happened no border crisis anymore?

We see what you did there.

Im glad that worked do you, and would support anyone who could have that option…IF THEY WANTED IT… however
you don’t get to speak for all women and not all women can be bio mothers…or want to be.
I believe women should be able to make that choice for themselves.
I also think women can have plenty of value without being married or parents….I have plenty of friends who fit this and do not deserve to be looked down on for their choices.
I have yet to EVER hear someone say that to be a parent is not a valuable position, so yeah …that ‘lie’ doesn’t hold up in my world.
Not to mention… Who started this ‘lie’?

Previously:

Are you ready for some football? (May 18, 2024)

Only there for the convenient Eschatology

20 Saturday Jul 2019

Posted by Michael Bersin in Josh Hawley, social media, US Senate

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

dog whistle, Eschatology, Josh Hawley, missouri, right wingnuts, speech, U.S. Senate

The Senator (r) doth protest too much, methinks.

Josh Hawley [2016 file photo].

This morning:

Josh Hawley @HawleyMO
Anti-Semitic “dog whistle”? Delivered at a conference organized by an Israeli Jew, to an audience of many Jewish-Americans, and from a guy who has been an ardent advocate of the state of Israel and the Jewish people? Nice try.
[….]
6:36 AM · Jul 20, 2019

“…Delivered at a conference organized by a[n] [far right wingnut] Israeli Jew…” Fixed it for you.

When the Dog Whistle Is Silver-Plated & Hand-Chased: Conservative Thinking At Its “Best”

It goes deeper than just an anti semitic dog whistle. The founders that crafted the political theory of the new nation, as seen in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, revered such Roman Stoic philosophers such as Seneca and Cicero and Marcus Aurelius. Ideas such as “All men are created equal” and appealing to “a decent respect to the opinions of mankind” and “let Facts be submitted to a candid world” are deeply Roman Stoic cosmopolitanism. The idea that human dignity is grounded in reason is deeply cosmopolitan. The idea that humans, all humans, by the mere fact of being human, are endowed with unalienable rights is deeply cosmopolitan. These are some of the aspirational ideals and principles of the European and American Enlightenments. These aspirational ideals are the legacy of the founding and our inheritance, first as human beings and then as citizens.

Hawley’s declaration that “It’s time we ended this cosmopolitan experiment” comes eerily close to “It’s time we ended this American experiment.” As Franklin said when announcing a new Republic, “if you can keep it.”

“…from a guy who has been an ardent advocate of the state of Israel and the Jewish people…”

Until it’s no longer convenient, right?

Previously:

Senator Hawley (r) gives a speech (July 19, 2019)

Senator Hawley (r) gives a speech

19 Friday Jul 2019

Posted by Michael Bersin in Josh Hawley, US Senate

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

dog whistle, Josh Hawley, missouri, speech, U.S. Senate

Josh Hawley (r) [2016 file photo].

Senator Josh Hawley gave a speech at the National Conservatism Conference. There were some interesting excerpts and turns of phrase:

…For years the politics of both Left and Right have been informed by a political consensus that reflects the interests not of the American middle, but of a powerful upper class and their cosmopolitan priorities.

This class lives in the United States, but they identify as “citizens of the world.” They run businesses or oversee universities here, but their primary loyalty is to the global community.

And they subscribe to a set of values held by similar elites in other places: things like the importance of global integration and the danger of national loyalties; the priority of social change over tradition, career over community, and achievement and merit and progress.

Call it the cosmopolitan consensus…

Universities, eh?

Merit, eh?

…According to the cosmopolitan consensus, globalization is a moral imperative. That’s because our elites distrust patriotism and dislike the common culture left to us by our forbearers…

They hate us for our freedoms?

…The nation’s leading academics…

You think they got there on merit? Just asking.

You mean like Yale, or Harvard, one of those fancy ones?

…The cosmopolitan elite look down on the common affections that once bound this nation together: things like place and national feeling and religious faith…

You think this was translated from the original German? Just asking.

…They regard our inherited traditions as oppressive and our shared institutions—like family and neighborhood and church—as backwards…

Interesting. You think people who attend Mosques or Synagogues don’t revere their families and value their neighbors and neighborhoods? Just asking for clarification.

…For the cosmopolitan class…

Is it just me, or do you hear “JEWS!” every time he uses that phrase?

…Because the truth is, the cosmopolitan economy has made the cosmopolitan class an aristocracy…

There it is again.

…financial instruments that benefit the cosmopolitan elite…

Like a freakin’ air horn.

…not the kinds of things a normal person without a fancy degree…

Dude, you attended a private school, Stanford, and Yale.

…The cosmopolitan agenda…

The dog whistle is strong with this one.

…They built a new republic governed not by a select elite, as in the days of old, but by the common man and woman…

Three fifths, dude, three fifths. The Seventeenth Amendment? The Nineteenth Amendment? Folks, that there is a real constitutional scholar’s writin’.

…an economy driven by money changing on Wall Street…

How biblical. We’ll give this one a “DOUBLE JEW!”

…not just in San Francisco and New York…

Uh, you do know there are a lot more people in those places? And “JEWS!”

…the cosmopolitan agenda…

There it is again.

In the back of their mind every Jewish person in America has the a sketch of an escape plan.

That was then…

11 Friday Sep 2009

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

2004, 2009.IOKIYAR, Bush, missouri, Obama, school, speech, Warrensburg

In October 2004 George W. Bush made a campaign swing through Missouri, traveling by bus caravan through Warrensburg via U.S. Highway 50 after speaking at a large outdoor rally at Lee’s Summit High School in eastern Jackson County. I received a communication reminding me of some of the circumstances in Warrensburg when George W. Bush, then President of the United States, made that campaign swing:

…In late October 2004, during the presidential contest between George Bush and John Kerry, Bush’s campaign buses made a quick swing through Warrensburg. In response to this partisan political event, every third grader at Martin-Warren Elementary School was marched to the town square [the Johnson County Courthouse grounds] to witness Bush’s buses driving by.

The third-graders crossed Highway 13 and walked a considerable distance. The parents had not been notified of this field trip and were never given the opportunity to either grant or deny permission to go. Students at the Middle School and Ridgeview Elementary were also dismissed from classes and brought roadside where they were instructed to wave at Bush’s buses.

The students lost out on classroom instruction time and were not exposed to any educational, or enriching concepts which might have been discussed or debated later.

Compare the actions of the Warrensburg School District then to its recent response to President Obama’s civic-oriented back-to-school speech.   Just as several Republican presidents have done before him, President Obama wanted to recognize the onset of a new school year and encourage students to do their best. When Presidents George H.W. Bush and Reagan delivered similar speeches, did local school districts prevent students from hearing them?

Remaining mindful that students learn through example, let’s do better in the future by displaying the honorable values of fairness,

tolerance and open-mindedness…

[emphasis added]

…This is now:

9/8/2009 10:47:00 AM

National talk draws local reactions

Area’s school districts question value of back-to-school speech

…Warrensburg School District Superintendent Deb Orr said, “Our staff and administrators are going to view the video and decide how to use it.”

District officials are not sure, for example, whether the message would have meaning for elementary school children, Orr said, but social studies students might benefit from hearing and discussing what Obama says.

“We are going to notify the parents about when we are going to use the video,” she said, and parents can decide whether their children opt in or out of the presentation…

Our previous coverage:

Alternate Activity

Plain speaking

Why parents need to keep their children from hearing President Obama say they should stay in school

The script of President Obama’s attempt to poison the minds of our children

SurveyUSA: Missouri poll on President Obama’s school speech

Whatever we must do to protect school children from President Obama

The obvious reason for the difference in the Warrensburg, Missouri schools? *IOKIYAR.

*it’s okay if you’re a republican

Barack Obama's Acceptance Speech Open Thread

29 Friday Aug 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Barack Obama, Democratic National Convention, John McCain, speech

What did you think of the speech last night? What were your favorite lines? Least favorite?

The entire text of the speech is here.

McCaskill Speech Snubbed By MSNBC…

27 Wednesday Aug 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Claire McCaskill, Democratic National Convention, MSNBC, speech

Who subsequently wonders why McCaskill didn’t get a primetime slot to give a red meat speech. Unbelievable!

Here’s the speech in case you missed it:

On second viewing, McCaskill didn’t grate on me the way it did the first time. The negatives are still there – she looks like she’s working way too hard to be enthusiastic, she’s got some awkward metaphors, and she quotes Obama a little too much.

On the plus side, McCaskill sure does know how to deliver some great anti-McCain lines with a smile, doesn’t she? She really shined in that role on Monday night, which otherwise largely ignored McCain.

Michelle Obama's DNC Speech

26 Tuesday Aug 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

Democratic National Convention, Michelle Obama, missouri, speech

In case you missed it (or want to see it again:)

I’m not all that cynical usually, but I found myself getting there yesterday. Sitting there, watching the speakers on TV one after another praise Barack Obama the same way, I started getting cranky. It didn’t help that Wolf Blitzer was droning on and on in between and sometimes during the speeches, a situation I remedied by switching it to C-SPAN, which doesn’t have commentators at all. Good thing, too, because as I understand it, Claire McCaskill’s speech wasn’t televised on CNN any other network.

Watching all those speeches back to back reminded me that public officials aren’t necessarily very good public speakers. In fact, some of the non-electeds who had been given a speaking slot were just as good as those who had spent years in office.

Case in point: Michelle Obama. As she spoke, especially introduced by her mom in a short film presented before the speech, my cynicism melted away.  It was the kind of speech that hits you in the gut, telling you her story, the kind of story we all want for ourselves and for our own kids. A woman that came through hard work from a struggling family to a successful law career and raise a family of her own, a picture passionately presented by Michelle. How could you not tear up a little when hearing about her father, since deceased, struggling to make it every day to work at a city water plant while fighting multiple sclerosis?

Barack Obama in Independence, MO: the speech transcript

02 Wednesday Jul 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Barack Obama, Independence, missouri, patriotism, speech

There’s been a lot of discussion on the Internets and in the old media about Barack Obama’s speech on patriotism at the Truman Memorial Building in Independence, Missouri on Monday, June 30th. Yeah, we were there, and here’s our coverage:

Barack Obama in Independence, MO: the preparation

Live from Independence, It’s Barack Obama

Obama in Independence: photos

Obama in Independence: stenography, or what was said and who said it

From Blue Girl, Red State:

Obama in Independence, Missouri – 30 June 2008

Elsewhere, Glenn Greenwald has an interesting take on the big picture:

The Obama campaign’s past two weeks

Some of the discussion has been about what it all means. The transcription elves at our Show Me Progress corporate headquarters have been really busy, and with the help of the “as prepared” text of the speech courtesy of Obama’s campaign, have been able to whip out a transcript of the actual goings on in record time. I’ve provided them below the fold – first, the text of his remarks as prepared, and second, the text of his remarks as delivered.

The prepared text of Barack Obama’s speech as released by his campaign:

Remarks of Senator Barack Obama

The America We Love – as prepared for delivery

Monday, June 30th, 2008

Independence, Missouri

On a spring morning in April of 1775, a simple band of colonists – farmers and merchants, blacksmiths and printers, men and boys – left their homes and families in Lexington and Concord to take up arms against the tyranny of an Empire.  The odds against them were long and the risks enormous – for even if they survived the battle, any ultimate failure would bring charges of treason, and death by hanging.

And yet they took that chance.  They did so not on behalf of a particular tribe or lineage, but on behalf of a larger idea.  The idea of liberty.  The idea of God-given, inalienable rights.  And with the first shot of that fateful day – a shot heard round the world – the American Revolution, and America’s experiment with democracy, began.

Those men of Lexington and Concord were among our first patriots.  And at the beginning of a week when we celebrate the birth of our nation, I think it is fitting to pause for a moment and reflect on the meaning of patriotism – theirs, and ours.  We do so in part because we are in the midst of war – more than one and a half million of our finest young men and women have now fought in Iraq and Afghanistan; over 60,000 have been wounded, and over 4,600 have been laid to rest.  The costs of war have been great, and the debate surrounding our mission in Iraq has been fierce.  It is natural, in light of such sacrifice by so many, to think more deeply about the commitments that bind us to our nation, and to each other.

We reflect on these questions as well because we are in the midst of a presidential election, perhaps the most consequential in generations; a contest that will determine the course of this nation for years, perhaps decades, to come.  Not only is it a debate about big issues – health care, jobs, energy, education, and retirement security – but it is also a debate about values.  How do we keep ourselves safe and secure while preserving our liberties?  How do we restore trust in a government that seems increasingly removed from its people and dominated by special interests?  How do we ensure that in an increasingly global economy, the winners maintain allegiance to the less fortunate?  And how do we resolve our differences at a time of increasing diversity?

Finally, it is worth considering the meaning of patriotism because the question of who is – or is not – a patriot all too often poisons our political debates, in ways that divide us rather than bringing us together.  I have come to know this from my own experience on the campaign trail.  Throughout my life, I have always taken my deep and abiding love for this country as a given.  It was how I was raised; it is what propelled me into public service; it is why I am running for President.  And yet, at certain times over the last sixteen months, I have found, for the first time, my patriotism challenged – at times as a result of my own carelessness, more often as a result of the desire by some to score political points and raise fears about who I am and what I stand for.

So let me say at this at outset of my remarks.  I will never question the patriotism of others in this campaign.  And I will not stand idly by when I hear others question mine.

My concerns here aren’t simply personal, however.  After all, throughout our history, men and women of far greater stature and significance than me have had their patriotism questioned in the midst of momentous debates.  Thomas Jefferson was accused by the Federalists of selling out to the French.  The anti-Federalists were just as convinced that John Adams was in cahoots with the British and intent on restoring monarchal rule.  Likewise, even our wisest Presidents have sought to justify questionable policies on the basis of patriotism.  Adams’ Alien and Sedition Act, Lincoln’s suspension of habeas corpus, Roosevelt’s internment of Japanese Americans – all were defended as expressions of patriotism, and those who disagreed with their policies were sometimes labeled as unpatriotic.

In other words, the use of patriotism as a political sword or a political shield is as old as the Republic.  Still, what is striking about today’s patriotism debate is the degree to which it remains rooted in the culture wars of the 1960s – in arguments that go back forty years or more.  In the early years of the civil rights movement and opposition to the Vietnam War, defenders of the status quo often accused anybody who questioned the wisdom of government policies of being unpatriotic.  Meanwhile, some of those in the so-called counter-culture of the Sixties reacted not merely by criticizing particular government policies, but by attacking the symbols, and in extreme cases, the very idea, of America itself – by burning flags; by blaming America for all that was wrong with the world; and perhaps most tragically, by failing to honor those veterans coming home from Vietnam, something that remains a national shame to this day.

Most Americans never bought into these simplistic world-views – these caricatures of left and right.  Most Americans understood that dissent does not make one unpatriotic, and that there is nothing smart or sophisticated about a cynical disregard for America’s traditions and institutions.  And yet the anger and turmoil of that period never entirely drained away.  All too often our politics still seems trapped in these old, threadbare arguments – a fact most evident during our recent debates about the war in Iraq, when those who opposed administration policy were tagged by some as unpatriotic, and a general providing his best counsel on how to move forward in Iraq was accused of betrayal.

Given the enormous challenges that lie before us, we can no longer afford these sorts of divisions.  None of us expect that arguments about patriotism will, or should, vanish entirely; after all, when we argue about patriotism, we are arguing about who we are as a country, and more importantly, who we should be.  But surely we can agree that no party or political philosophy has a monopoly on patriotism.  And surely w
e can arrive at a definition of patriotism that, however rough and imperfect, captures the best of America’s common spirit.

What would such a definition look like?  For me, as for most Americans, patriotism starts as a gut instinct, a loyalty and love for country rooted in my earliest memories.  I’m not just talking about the recitations of the Pledge of Allegiance or the Thanksgiving pageants at school or the fireworks on the Fourth of July, as wonderful as those things may be.  Rather, I’m referring to the way the American ideal wove its way throughout the lessons my family taught me as a child.

One of my earliest memories is of sitting on my grandfather’s shoulders and watching the astronauts come to shore in Hawaii.  I remember the cheers and small flags that people waved, and my grandfather explaining how we Americans could do anything we set our minds to do.  That’s my idea of America.

I remember listening to my grandmother telling stories about her work on a bomber assembly-line during World War II.  I remember my grandfather handing me his dog-tags from his time in Patton’s Army, and understanding that his defense of this country marked one of his greatest sources of pride.  That’s my idea of America.

I remember, when living for four years in Indonesia as a child, listening to my mother reading me the first lines of the Declaration of Independence – “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal. That they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”  I remember her explaining how this declaration applied to every American, black and white and brown alike; how those words, and words of the United States Constitution, protected us from the injustices that we witnessed other people suffering during those years abroad.  That’s my idea of America.

As I got older, that gut instinct – that America is the greatest country on earth – would survive my growing awareness of our nation’s imperfections: it’s ongoing racial strife; the perversion of our political system laid bare during the Watergate hearings; the wrenching poverty of the Mississippi Delta and the hills of Appalachia.  Not only because, in my mind, the joys of American life and culture, its vitality, its variety and its freedom, always outweighed its imperfections, but because I learned that what makes America great has never been its perfection but the belief that it can be made better.  I came to understand that our revolution was waged for the sake of that belief – that we could be governed by laws, not men; that we could be equal in the eyes of those laws; that we could be free to say what we want and assemble with whomever we want and worship as we please; that we could have the right to pursue our individual dreams but the obligation to help our fellow citizens pursue theirs.

For a young man of mixed race, without firm anchor in any particular community, without even a father’s steadying hand, it is this essential American idea – that we are not constrained by the accident of birth but can make of our lives what we will – that has defined my life, just as it has defined the life of so many other Americans.

That is why, for me, patriotism is always more than just loyalty to a place on a map or a certain kind of people.  Instead, it is also loyalty to America’s ideals – ideals for which anyone can sacrifice, or defend, or give their last full measure of devotion.  I believe it is this loyalty that allows a country teeming with different races and ethnicities, religions and customs, to come together as one.  It is the application of these ideals that separate us from Zimbabwe, where the opposition party and their supporters have been silently hunted, tortured or killed; or Burma, where tens of thousands continue to struggle for basic food and shelter in the wake of a monstrous storm because a military junta fears opening up the country to outsiders; or Iraq, where despite the heroic efforts of our military, and the courage of many ordinary Iraqis, even limited cooperation between various factions remains far too elusive.

I believe those who attack America’s flaws without acknowledging the singular greatness of our ideals, and their proven capacity to inspire a better world, do not truly understand America.

Of course, precisely because America isn’t perfect, precisely because our ideals constantly demand more from us, patriotism can never be defined as loyalty to any particular leader or government or policy.  As Mark Twain, that greatest of American satirists and proud son of Missouri, once wrote, “Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.”  We may hope that our leaders and our government stand up for our ideals, and there are many times in our history when that’s occurred.  But when our laws, our leaders or our government are out of alignment with our ideals, then the dissent of ordinary Americans may prove to be one of the truest expression of patriotism.

The young preacher from Georgia, Martin Luther King, Jr., who led a movement to help America confront our tragic history of racial injustice and live up to the meaning of our creed – he was a patriot.  The young soldier who first spoke about the prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib – he is a patriot.  Recognizing a wrong being committed in this country’s name; insisting that we deliver on the promise of our Constitution – these are the acts of patriots, men and women who are defending that which is best in America.  And we should never forget that – especially when we disagree with them; especially when they make us uncomfortable with their words.

Beyond a loyalty to America’s ideals, beyond a willingness to dissent on behalf of those ideals, I also believe that patriotism must, if it is to mean anything, involve the willingness to sacrifice – to give up something we value on behalf of a larger cause.  For those who have fought under the flag of this nation – for the young veterans I meet when I visit Walter Reed; for those like John McCain who have endured physical torment in service to our country – no further proof of such sacrifice is necessary.  And let me also add that no one should ever devalue that service, especially for the sake of a political campaign, and that goes for supporters on both sides.

We must always express our profound gratitude for the service of our men and women in uniform.  Period.  Indeed, one of the good things to emerge from the current conflict in Iraq has been the widespread recognition that whether you support this war or oppose it, the sacrifice of our troops is always worthy of honor.

For the rest of us – for those of us not in uniform or without loved ones in the military – the call to sacrifice for the country’s greater good remains an imperative of citizenship.  Sadly, in recent years, in the midst of war on two fronts, this call to service never came.  After 9/11, we were asked to shop.  The wealthiest among us saw their tax obligations decline, even as the costs of war continued to mount.  Rather than work together to reduce our dependence on foreign oil, and thereby lessen our vulnerability to a volatile region, our energy policy remained unchanged, and our oil dependence only grew.

In spite of this absence of leadership from Washington, I have seen a new generation of Americans begin to take up the call.  I meet them everywhere I go, young people involved in the project of American renewal; not only those who have signed up to fight for our country in distant lands, but those who are fighting for a better America here at home, by teaching in underserved schools, or caring for the sick in understaffed hospitals, or promoting more sustainable energy policies in their local communities.

I believe one of the tasks of the next Administration is to ensure that this movement towards service grows and sustains itself in the years to come.  We
should expand AmeriCorps and grow the Peace Corps.  We should encourage national service by making it part of the requirement for a new college assistance program, even as we strengthen the benefits for those whose sense of duty has already led them to serve in our military.

We must remember, though, that true patriotism cannot be forced or legislated with a mere set of government programs.  Instead, it must reside in the hearts of our people, and cultivated in the heart of our culture, and nurtured in the hearts of our children.

As we begin our fourth century as a nation, it is easy to take the extraordinary nature of America for granted.  But it is our responsibility as Americans and as parents to instill that history in our children, both at home and at school.  The loss of quality civic education from so many of our classrooms has left too many young Americans without the most basic knowledge of who our forefathers are, or what they did, or the significance of the founding documents that bear their names.  Too many children are ignorant of the sheer effort, the risks and sacrifices made by previous generations, to ensure that this country survived war and depression; through the great struggles for civil, and social, and worker’s rights.

It is up to us, then, to teach them.  It is up to us to teach them that even though we have faced great challenges and made our share of mistakes, we have always been able to come together and make this nation stronger, and more prosperous, and more united, and more just.  It is up to us to teach them that America has been a force for good in the world, and that other nations and other people have looked to us as the last, best hope of Earth.  It is up to us to teach them that it is good to give back to one’s community; that it is honorable to serve in the military; that it is vital to participate in our democracy and make our voices heard.

And it is up to us to teach our children a lesson that those of us in politics too often forget: that patriotism involves not only defending this country against external threat, but also working constantly to make America a better place for future generations.

When we pile up mountains of debt for the next generation to absorb, or put off changes to our energy policies, knowing full well the potential consequences of inaction, we are placing our short-term interests ahead of the nation’s long-term well-being.  When we fail to educate effectively millions of our children so that they might compete in a global economy, or we fail to invest in the basic scientific research that has driven innovation in this country, we risk leaving behind an America that has fallen in the ranks of the world.  Just as patriotism involves each of us making a commitment to this nation that extends beyond our own immediate self-interest, so must that commitment extends beyond our own time here on earth.

Our greatest leaders have always understood this.  They’ve defined patriotism with an eye toward posterity.  George Washington is rightly revered for his leadership of the Continental Army, but one of his greatest acts of patriotism was his insistence on stepping down after two terms, thereby setting a pattern for those that would follow, reminding future presidents that this is a government of and by and for the people.

Abraham Lincoln did not simply win a war or hold the Union together.  In his unwillingness to demonize those against whom he fought; in his refusal to succumb to either the hatred or self-righteousness that war can unleash; in his ultimate insistence that in the aftermath of war the nation would no longer remain half slave and half free; and his trust in the better angels of our nature – he displayed the wisdom and courage that sets a standard for patriotism.

And it was the most famous son of Independence, Harry S Truman, who sat in the White House during his final days in office and said in his Farewell Address: “When Franklin Roosevelt died, I felt there must be a million men better qualified than I, to take up the Presidential task…But through all of it, through all the years I have worked here in this room, I have been well aware than I did not really work alone – that you were working with me.  No President could ever hope to lead our country, or to sustain the burdens of this office, save the people helped with their support.”

In the end, it may be this quality that best describes patriotism in my mind – not just a love of America in the abstract, but a very particular love for, and faith in, the American people.  That is why our heart swells with pride at the sight of our flag; why we shed a tear as the lonely notes of Taps sound.  For we know that the greatness of this country – its victories in war, its enormous wealth, its scientific and cultural achievements – all result from the energy and imagination of the American people; their toil, drive, struggle, restlessness, humor and quiet heroism.

That is the liberty we defend – the liberty of each of us to pursue our own dreams.  That is the equality we seek – not an equality of results, but the chance of every single one of us to make it if we try.  That is the community we strive to build – one in which we trust in this sometimes messy democracy of ours, one in which we continue to insist that there is nothing we cannot do when we put our mind to it, one in which we see ourselves as part of a larger story, our own fates wrapped up in the fates of those who share allegiance to America’s happy and singular creed.

Thank you, God Bless you, and may God Bless the United States of America.

###

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Monday, June 30, 2008

Contact: Obama Press Office; (xxx) xxx-xxxx

What Barack Obama actually said:

Remarks of Senator Barack Obama

The America We Love – as delivered

Monday, June 30th, 2008

Independence, Missouri

[cheers][applause] Thank you Independence. Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you so much  [garbled]. It is good to be in Independence, Missouri. I want to begin by expressing my deep gratitude to Vincel Gunther [sp] not only for his wonderful introduction, but more importantly, for his service to our country. Please give Vince a…[applause]

I also just want to acknowledge some wonderful public servants who are here,  Congressman Emanuel Cleaver [cheers] [applause], Congressman Ike Skelton [cheers][applause], Jackson County Executive Mike Sanders [cheers][applause], State Senator Jolie Justus [cheers][applause] and State Treasurer Susan Montee, a great friend of mine who has been working tirelessly on our campaign. [applause] And I also want to make sure that I mentioned a few friends who could not be here today, your wonderful U.S. Senator, Claire McCaskill [cheers] [applause], for the jayhawks in the audience, a great supporter, Governor Kathleen Sebelius, [cheers][applause], and Attorney General Jay Nixon. [cheers][applause]

On a spring morning in April of 1775, a simple band of colonists – farmers and merchants, blacksmiths and printers, men and boys – left their homes and their families in Lexington and Concord to take up arms against the tyranny of an Empire.  The odds against them were long and the risks enormous – for even if they survived that particular battle, any ultimate failure would bring charges of treason, and death by hanging.

And yet they took that chance.  They did so not on behalf of a particular tribe or lineage, but on behalf of a larger idea.  The idea of liberty.  The idea of God-given, inalienable rights.  And with the first shot of that fateful day – a shot heard round the world that was fired – the American Revolution, and America’s experiment with democracy, began.

Those men of Lexington and Concord were among our first patriots.  And at the beginning of a week when we cel
ebrate the birth of our nation, I think it’s fitting to pause for a moment and reflect on the meaning of patriotism – theirs, and ours.  We do so in part because we are in the midst of war – more than one and a half million of our finest young men and women have now fought in Iraq and Afghanistan; over 60,000 have been wounded, and over 4,600 have been laid to rest.  The costs of war have been great, and the debate surrounding our mission in Iraq has been fierce.  It’s natural, in light of such sacrifice by so many, to think more deeply about the commitments that bind us together as a nation, and bind us to each other as well.

We reflect on these questions also because we are in the midst of a presidential election, perhaps the most consequential in generations; a contest that will determine the course of this nation for years, perhaps decades, to come.  Not only is it a debate about big issues – health care, jobs, energy, education, retirement security – but it’s also a debate about values.  How do we keep ourselves safe and secure while preserving our liberties?  How do we restore trust in a government that seems increasingly removed from its people and dominated by special interests?  How do we ensure that in an increasingly global economy, the winners maintain allegiance to the less fortunate?  And how do we resolve our differences at a time of increasing diversity?

Finally, it’s worth considering the meaning of patriotism because the question of who is – or is not – a patriot all too often poisons our political debates, in ways that divide us rather than bring us together.  I have come to know this from my own experience on the campaign trail.  Throughout my life, I have always taken my deep and abiding love for this country as a given.  It was how I was raised; it is what propelled me into public service; it is why I am running for President.  And yet, at certain times over the last sixteen months, I have found, for the first time, my patriotism challenged – at times as a result of my own carelessness, more often as a result of the desire by some to score political points and raise fears and doubts about who I am and what I stand for.

So let me say at this at outset of my remarks.  I will never question the patriotism of others in this campaign. [applause][cheers] And I will not stand idly by when I hear others question mine. [cheers][applause]

My concerns here aren’t simply personal, however.  After all, throughout our history, men and women of far greater significance and stature than me have had their patriotism questioned in the midst of momentous debates.  Thomas Jefferson was accused by the Federalists of selling out to the French.  The anti-Federalists were just as convinced that John Adams was in cahoots with the British and intent on restoring monarchal rule.  Likewise, even our wisest Presidents have sought sometimes to justify questionable practices on the basis of patriotism.  Adams’ Alien and Sedition Act, Lincoln’s suspension of habeas corpus, Roosevelt’s internment of Japanese Americans during World War II – all were defended at the time as expressions of patriotism, and those who disagreed with their policies were sometimes labeled as unpatriotic.

In other words, the use of patriotism as a political sword or a political shield is as old as the Republic.  Still, what’s striking about today’s patriotism debate is the degree to which it remains rooted in the culture wars of the 1960s – in arguments that go back forty years or more.  Some of you remember this, in the early years of the civil rights movement and the opposition to the Vietnam War, defenders of the status quo often accused anybody who questioned the wisdom of government policies of being unpatriotic.  Meanwhile, some of those in the so-called counter-culture of the Sixties reacted not merely by criticizing particular government policies, but by attacking the symbols, and in extreme cases, the very idea, of America itself – by burning flags; by blaming America for all that was wrong with the world; and perhaps most tragically, by failing to honor those veterans coming home from Vietnam, something that remains a national shame to this day. [applause]

Now, most Americans never bought into these simplistic world-views – these caricatures of left and right.  Most Americans understood that dissent does not make one unpatriotic [applause], and most Americans understand that there is nothing smart or sophisticated about a cynical disregard for America’s traditions and institutions [applause]. And yet, and yet the anger and turmoil of that period never entirely drained away.  All too often our politics still seems trapped in these old, threadbare arguments – a fact most evident during our recent debates about the war in Iraq, when those who opposed administration policy were tagged by some as unpatriotic, and a general providing his best counsel on how to move forward in Iraq was accused of betrayal.

Given the enormous challenges that lie before us, we can no longer afford these sorts of divisions.  None of us expect that arguments about patriotism will, or should, vanish entirely; after all, when we argue about patriotism, we are arguing about who we are as a country, and more importantly, who we should be.  But surely we can agree that no party or political philosophy has a monopoly on patriotism. [cheers][applause] And surely we can arrive at a definition of patriotism that, however rough and imperfect, captures the best of America’s common spirit.

What would such a definition look like?  For me, as for most Americans, patriotism starts as a gut instinct, a loyalty and love for country that’s rooted in some of my earliest memories.  I’m not just talking about the recitations of the Pledge of Allegiance or the Thanksgiving pageants at school or the same fireworks on the Fourth of July that we just heard from earlier from Vince. Rather, as wonderful as those things may be, I’m referring to the way the American ideal wove its way throughout the lessons my family. Lessons that my family taught me as a child.

You know one of my earliest memories is of sitting on my grandfather’s shoulders and watching the astronauts come to shore in Hawaii.  I remember the cheers and small flags that people waved, and my grandfather explaining how we Americans could do anything we set our minds to do.  That’s my idea of America. [cheers][applause]

I remember listening to my grandmother telling stories about her work on a bomber assembly-line during World War II.  I remember my grandfather handing me his dog-tags from his time in Patton’s Army, and understanding that his defense of this country marked one of his greatest sources of pride.  That’s my idea of America.

I remember [applause], I remember when living for four years in Indonesia as a child, I listened to my mother reading me the first lines of the Declaration of Independence – “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal. [applause] That they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”  I remember her explaining how this declaration applied to every American, black and white and brown alike; how those words, and the words of the United States Constitution, protected us from the injustices that we witnessed other people suffering during those years abroad.  That’s my idea of America. [applause]

As I got older, that gut instinct that so many of us have – that America is the greatest country on earth [applause] – would survive, that, that, that gut instinct, that knowledge would survive my growing awareness of our nation’s imperfections: it’s ongoing racial strife; the perversions of our political system laid bare during the Watergate hearings; the wrenching poverty of the Mississippi Delta and the hills of Appalachia and inner cities and rural communities all across America.  That instinct that this is the greate
st country on earth survived not only because, in my mind, the joys of American life and culture, its vitality, its variety, its freedom, always outweighed its imperfections, but because I learned that what makes America great has never been its perfection but the belief that it can be made better.  I came to understand that our revolution was waged for the sake of that belief – that we could be governed by laws, not men; that we could be equal in the eyes of those laws; that we could be free to say what we want and assemble with whomever we want and worship as we please; that we could have the right to pursue our individual dreams but the obligation to help our fellow citizens pursue theirs. There are…[applause]

For a young man like me, of mixed race, without firm anchor in any particular community, without even a father’s steadying hand, it is this essential American idea – that we are not constrained by the accident of birth but can make of our lives what we will – that has defined my life [voice: “Yeah.”], just as it has defined the life of so many other Americans. [cheers][applause]

That’s why, for me, patriotism is always more than just loyalty to a place on a map or a certain kind of people.  Instead, it’s also loyalty to America’s ideals – ideals for which anyone can sacrifice, or defend, or give their last full measure of devotion.  I believe it is this loyalty that allows a country teeming with different races and ethnicities, religions and customs, to come together as one.  It is the application of these ideals that separates us from Zimbabwe, where the opposition party and their supporters have been silently hunted, tortured or killed; it separates us from Burma, where tens of thousands continue to struggle for basic food and shelter in the wake of a monstrous storm because a military junta fears opening up the country to outsiders; or Iraq, where despite the heroic efforts of our military – men and women like Vince, and the courage of many ordinary Iraqis, even limited cooperation between various factions remains far too elusive.

I believe those who attack America’s flaws without acknowledging the singular greatness of our ideals, and their proven capacity to inspire a better world, do not truly understand America. [applause]

Of course, precisely because America isn’t perfect, precisely because our ideals constantly demand more from us, patriotism can never be defined as loyalty to any particular leader or government or policy.  As ,[applause] as Mark Twain, that greatest of American satirists and proud son of Missouri, once wrote, “Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.” [cheers][applause] Now, we may hope that our leaders and our government stand up for our ideals, stand up for what’s right, and there are many times in our history when that’s occurred.  But when our laws, when our leaders or our government are out of alignment with those ideals, then the dissent of ordinary Americans may prove to be one of the truest expression of patriotism. [cheers][applause]

The young preacher from Georgia, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., who led a movement to help America confront our tragic history of racial injustice and live up to the meaning of our creed – he was a patriot.  The young soldier who first spoke about the prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib – he is a patriot. [cheers][applause]  Recognizing a wrong being committed in this country’s name; insisting that we deliver on the promise of our Constitution – these are the acts of patriots, [applause] men and women who are defending that which is best in America.  And we should never forget that – especially when we disagree with them; especially when they make us uncomfortable with their words. That’s part of the American tradition. That’s part of why we are proud to be Americans.

Beyond a loyalty to America’s ideals, beyond a willingness to dissent on behalf of those ideals, I also believe that patriotism must, if it is to mean anything, involve the willingness to sacrifice – to give up something we value on behalf of a larger cause.  And for those who have fought under the flag of this nation – for the young veterans like Vince, the young veterans I meet when I visit Walter Reed; for those like John McCain who have endured physical torment in service to our country – no further proof of such sacrifice is necessary.  And let me also add that no one should ever devalue that service, [applause] especially for the sake of a political campaign, and that goes for supporters on both sides.

We must always express our profound gratitude for the service of our men and women in uniform.  Period. Full stop. [cheers][applause] Indeed, one of, one of the good things to emerge from the current conflict in Iraq has been the widespread recognition that whether you support this war or oppose it, the sacrifice of our troops is always worthy of honor. That’s a change from the sixties. That’s been very welcome to many of us.

But, you know, for the rest of us – for those of us not in uniform or without loved ones in the military – the call to service for the country’s greater good remains an imperative of citizenship.  Sadly, in recent years, in the midst of war on two fronts, this call to service never came.  After 9/11, we were asked to shop.  The wealthiest among us saw their tax obligations decline, something that had never occurred before during wartime, even as the costs of war continue to mount.  Rather than work together to reduce our dependence on foreign oil, and thereby lessen our vulnerability to a volatile region, our energy policy remained unchanged, and our oil dependence only grew.

In spite of this absence of leadership from Washington, I have seen a new generation of Americans begin to take up the call.  I meet them everywhere I go, young people involved in the project of American renewal; not only those who have signed up to fight for our country in distant lands, but those who are fighting for a better America right here at home, by reaching out to those who are less fortunate, by teaching in underserved schools, or caring for the sick in understaffed hospitals, or promoting more sustainable energy policies in their local communities. [applause]

I believe one of the tasks of the next Administration is to ensure that this movement towards service grows and sustains itself in the years to come.  We should expand AmeriCorps and grow the Peace Corps.  We should encourage national service by making it part of the requirement for a new college assistance program, even as we strengthen [applause] the benefits for those whose sense of duty has already led them to serve in our military.

So government can do it’s part. We must remember, though, that true patriotism cannot be forced or legislated with a mere set of government programs.  Instead, it must reside in the hearts of our people, and cultivated in the heart of our culture, and nurtured in the hearts of our children. [applause]

As we begin, as we begin our fourth century as a nation, it is easy to take the extraordinary nature of America for granted.  But it is our responsibility as Americans and as parents to instill that history in our children, both at home and at school.  The loss of quality civic education from so many of our classrooms has left too many young Americans without the most basic knowledge of who our forefathers are, [applause] or what they did, or the significance of the founding documents that bear their names.  Too many children are ignorant of the sheer effort, the risks and sacrifices made by previous generations, to ensure that this country survived war and depression; through the great struggles of civil, and social, and worker’s rights.

It is up to us, then, to teach them.  It is up to us to teach them that even though we have faced great challenges and made our share of mistakes, we have always been able to come together and make this nation stronger, and more prosperous, and more united, and more j
ust.  It’s up to us to teach them that America has been a force for good in the world, and that other nations and other people have looked to us as the last, best hope on Earth.  It is up to us to teach them that it is good to give back to one’s community; that it is honorable to serve in the military [applause]; that it is vital to participate in our democracy and make our voices heard.

And it is up to us to teach our children a lesson that those of us in politics too often forget: that patriotism involves not only defending this country against external threat, but also working constantly to make America a better place for future generations. [applause]

When we pile up mountains of debt for the next generation to absorb, or put off changes to our energy policies, knowing full well the potential consequences of inaction, we are placing our short-term interests ahead of the nation’s long-term well-being.  When we fail to educate effectively millions of our children so that they might compete in a global economy, or we fail to invest in the basic scientific research that has driven innovation in this country, we risk leaving behind an America that has fallen in the ranks of the world.  Just as patriotism involves each of us making a commitment to this nation that extends beyond our own individual immediate self-interest, so must that commitment extend beyond our own time here on earth.

Our greatest leaders have always understood this.  They’ve defined patriotism with an eye toward posterity.  George Washington is rightly revered for his leadership of the Continental Army, but one of his greatest acts of patriotism was his insistence on stepping down after two terms, thereby setting a pattern for those that would follow, reminding future presidents that this is a government of and by and for the people. [cheers][applause]

Abraham, Abraham Lincoln did not simply win a war or hold the Union together.  In his unwillingness to demonize those against whom he fought; in his refusal to succumb to either the hatred or self-righteousness that war can unleash; in his ultimate insistence that in the aftermath of war the nation would no longer remain half slave and half free; and his trust in the better angels of our nature – Lincoln displayed the wisdom and courage that sets a standard for patriotism.

And it was the most famous son of Independence, Harry S Truman, who sat in the White House during his final days in office and said in his Farewell Address: “When Franklin Roosevelt died, I felt there must be millions, a million men better qualified than I, to take up the Presidential task…But through all of it, through all the years I have worked here in this room, I have been well aware than I did not really work alone – that you were working with me.  No President could ever hope to lead our country, or to sustain the burdens of this office, save the people helped with their support.”

In the end, [applause]  that’s what Truman said. And in the end it may be this quality that best describes patriotism in my mind – not just a love of America in the abstract, but a very particular love for, and faith in, the American people.  That’s why our heart swells with pride at the sight of our flag; why we shed a tear as the lonely notes of Taps sound.  For we know that the greatness of this country – its victories in war, its enormous wealth, its scientific and cultural achievements – all result from the energy and imagination of the American people; their toil, drive, struggle, their restlessness, humor and quiet heroism.

That’s the liberty we defend – the liberty of each of us to pursue our own dreams.  That’s the equality we seek – not an equality of results, but the chance of every single one of us to make it if we try.  [voice: “Yeah.”] That’s the community we strive to build – one in which we trust in this sometimes messy democracy of ours, one in which we continue to insist that there is nothing we cannot do when we put our mind to it, one in which we see ourselves as part of a larger story, our own fates wrapped up in the fates of those who share allegiance to America’s happy and singular creed. [applause] That’s what they [garbled].

Thank you, God Bless you, and may God Bless the United States of America. [cheers][applause]

And that’s the way it was…

Recent Posts

  • Gerrymander this, Denny
  • Fascist pig
  • Still a felon
  • Passing the gas – Donald Trump (r) does his thing
  • Who checks? You, Eric?

Recent Comments

Steve Duane Phipps on Profit!
The price we all pay… on “Up, Up and Away……
HB 2075: Who checks?… on Hey Brandon Phelps (r), we hea…
Campaign Finance: a… on Campaign Finance: Working Peop…
The mail pieces have… on Are you certain it wasn’…

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,035,015 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

 

Loading Comments...