• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Tag Archives: Independence

Meanwhile, in Independence, Missouri

30 Monday Aug 2021

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

anti-mask, Corona virus, COVID-19, exposure, Independence, missouri, pandemic

Today, from the City of Independence:

City of Independence issues COVID-19 exposure warning to all who attended Aug. 16 Council Meeting
August 30, 2021

The City of Independence Health and Animal Services Department was made aware of at least one positive COVID-19 case associated with individuals in attendance during the Aug. 16 City Council Meeting today. All individuals in attendance at this meeting who were in the Chamber were likely exposed and should get tested, especially if showing any symptoms of COVID-19.
[….]

And approximately one incubation period earlier:

Independence City Council votes down mask mandate
4-2 vote with mayor, Dan Hobart for mandate
By: Nick StarlingPosted at 3:02 PM, Aug 16, 2021 and last updated 10:15 PM, Aug 16, 2021

KANSAS CITY, Mo. — In front of a capacity crowd, the Independence City Council on Monday voted down a resolution allowing the mayor and health director to issue a health order that would make masks mandatory indoors and outdoors at “large community events.”

[….]

Several attendees arrived to the council chambers with signs in tow, hoping the council wouldn’t adopt a mandate. The majority of residents who spoke in person Monday night were opposed to a mandate, citing freedoms and personal choice.

[….]

History, if there will be any, won’t be kind.

Image

Harry’s 129th!

08 Wednesday May 2013

Tags

Cartoon of Harry Truman, Democratic Party, Democrats, Give 'Em Hell Harry, Harry Truman, Independence, missouri, Missouri Democratic Party, Missouri Democrats, President Truman, Truman Birthday, Truman Doctrine

Posted by Michael Bersin | Filed under Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Sen. Claire McCaskill (D) in Independence and Harrisonville – July 2, 2012

03 Tuesday Jul 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

2012, Claire McCaskill, Harrisonville, Independence, missouri, Senate

“…One of the most conservative chief justices in decades has upheld the law. And now the Republicans are busy spinning distortions and lies about what this legislation is and what it will do…”

Senator Claire McCaskill (D) continued her campaign swing across Missouri with afternoon events at campaigns headquarters in Independence and Harrisonville.

Three Things. Senator Claire McCaskill (D) in Harrisonville, Missouri on July 2, 2012.

The Republicans want to privatize Medicare, privatize Social Security, and end

federal involvement in student loans.

Signing in to the Independence campaign headquarters.

Before the start of the Independence headquarters event there was a media availability outside with Senator McCaskill. The transcript:

[….]

Question: …Okay, so, no RV, huh?

Senator Claire McCaskill (D): Yeah, well, it’s on its way, we had a little air conditioning problem. So, um, we had to get the air conditioner fixed today. It’s a little hot to be, um, driving in an RV with no air conditioning, so.

Question: But wasn’t that supposed to be your good luck charm, ’cause you took Blunt’s?

Senator McCaskill: Yeah, it is. It is. We were in it all weekend. We were, uh, with, this is our second time out with it. We’ll be in it the rest of the week, so.

Question: Um, last week, of course, the big news was the, uh, the health care ruling and, um, had a couple days to reflect on that. Uh, your statement before didn’t say a whole lot about the law itself. I mean, where are you on this ’cause some of your opponents already saying you’re trying to really back off from your support of that and calling it, uh, now hitting you with the idea you voted for a tax increase since the Supreme Court is calling it a tax increase.

Senator McCaskill: One of the most conservative chief justices in decades has upheld the law. And now the Republicans are busy spinning distortions and lies about what this legislation is and what it will do. If Missourians will give it a chance they’ll find out that it’s gonna be a way, uh, that if you have insurance you’ll keep it, if you don’t, you’ll have a place you can shop with private insurance companies to get affordable, accessible health care. It’s not any more complicated than that.

Now, if you can afford insurance and you refuse to buy it and you want all the rest of us to pay your bills for you? Then you’re gonna have a slight penalty. And that’s what the law has been from day one, that’s what it still is, and I hope Missourians give it a chance ’cause they’re really gonna be pleasantly surprised…

Representative Emanuel Cleaver (D) at the Independence headquarters event.

The press availability in Independence.

…Question: You’re on board, individual mandate and all?

Senator McCaskill: Yeah, I mean, it is, it is important. We have a mandate now. The mandate is through the emergency room. So if someone decides to buy a new Harley Davidson instead of paying for health care we pay their bills when they show up at the emergency room. That’s why our insurance rates keep going up. And the goal here is very simple and very straight forward, affordable, accessible health care for everyone in this country. And to do that we’ve got to make sure that the freeloaders, the ones who can afford it and just say, let somebody else pay the bill? Um, that’s the first time I’ve seen Republicans so anxious to defend the freeloaders.

Question: Senator, do you think Democrats need to do a better job of selling this plan because even last week in the wake of the ruling the silence or the sort of the non comment comments from Democrats was amazing to us.

Senator McCaskill: I, I’m not sure that there was a non comment comment. I think, um, I think, frankly, we were startled that they would, that they would, uh, lie like they are. Um, they’re, it’s as if they’re trying to convince everyone that the Supreme Court changed what it is into something different than what was passed. Of course the Supreme Court can’t do that. The Supreme Court, uh, upheld the notion that if you are going to the emergency room and getting health care then you need to share in that burden of paying for the health insurance that covers that health care. And that’s all this is. And it’s not a government takeover, it’s all private insurance companies, and it’s gonna be accessible and affordable. And, for the first time, we’re gonna see insurance rates stabilize in this country, because as people remember, they’ve been going up ten percent a year for a long time to cover all those freeloaders that are showing up at the emergency room.

Question: And we’re standing here in Independence [Missouri] . How important is this city to your reelection efforts this year?

Senator McCaskill: Well, every city is important in my reelection efforts. And I think one of the reasons the Republicans are lying about the health care bill and distorting what the facts are, is they’re trying to distract people from what their plan is. And their plan is very clear, and all three of my opponents have said, we’re down. And that is to privatize Medicare, privatize Social Security, and do away with the federal government’s involvement in student loans. And those are three big non starters with Missourians, it doesn’t matter what city they live in.

Question: You’re in fighting form, Senator.

Senator McCaskill: Yeah, well, it, it’s a fight. But, I, I’m used to this. I’m used to people distorting my record and lying about my record and we now have, uh, over seven million dollars in anonymous money, uh, that is flooding the TV, uh, airwaves with, uh, lies about my record. Um, I think if people knew who was paying for these ads they’d be pretty proud of me. They’d say, you know, she’s made the right enemies in Washington. Um, she’s looking after us because the big guys, uh, want to take her out. And I’ve got to get that message, uh, not only here in Independence, but I gotta spread it to every small town, doesn’t matter if it’s red territory, blue territory, or somewhere I’m gonna be working.

[….]

Question: …Speaking of money, um, second quarter, uh, just wrapped up. How are you doing?

Senator McCaskill: Uh, remarkably well, remarkably well. I’m, I would get in big trouble if I told you how well we did. But, um, and we still get mail that is dated, the check’s dated before, uh, the end of the quarter. There should, there could be some checks in tomorrow’s mail so the number’s not final yet, But, um, you know, am I gonna have the most money? Gosh no. I can’t compete with the Koch brothers and these anonymous billionaires that want to be masters of the universe and make sure the tax code keeps them fat and happy. Um, on the other hand will we have enough to get our message out? Uh, yeah, I think we will, because I think there’s a lot of people that are sending in small amounts of money that get what’s at stake here. It’s, it’s the control of the United States Senate.

Question: Speaking of message, um, one of your opponents said that, you know, based on something you said over the weekend, I think it was in Columbia when you launched your tour, uh, the idea that you were criticizing Missourians for not understanding what was in the health care. I mean, do you feel that Missourians, when they voted for it two years ago, against it two years ago, did not understand what they were voting for?

Senator McCaskill: No, I, I wasn’t criticizing Missourians. I, I was saying that the Republicans are lying about what’s in the bill. I was criticizing them, not Missourians. Um, I understand that Missourians don’t like to be told that they have to do anything by the government. Uh, we don’t like the government, it’s kind of in our DNA in Missouri. So I get why the mandate on its surface is unpopular. But if you think about the fact that we do mandate health care now, unless we want to become a country where you show up at the emergency room dying and we say, I’m sorry, we’re gonna let you die if you don’t have insurance – we have mandated health care. The question is, how can we pay for that in a way that’s fair to everyone? It shouldn’t just be a burden on those people who are buying health insurance and paying the costs of that health care. It should be a burden that is shared by everyone, especially when some people are gonna be in a position that they can afford it now and they just choose not to and let somebody else pay for it. That’s not the way we should do this.

Question: Do you think this will fade by November and other issues will become more important, or do you think that this is gonna continue on all the way through.

Senator McCaskill: Well, I think jobs are pretty important. I think continuing to make progress on the jobs front is pretty important, our overall economic health is very important. But I tell you what I think will end up being most important in this race. Do you want someone who is more interested in pleasing the tea party and shutting down Medicare as we know it, privatizing Social Security, and getting rid of student loans in this country except for the wealthy? Um, or, somebody who’s proud, uh, to be, uh, a middle of the roader, somebody who welcomes compromise. I mean, just in the last two months, two of the leading candidates for Vice President have asked me to work with them on legislation in Washington. And those aren’t candidates for Vice President on the Democratic side. That would be Marco Rubio, who I’m working with on a bill to make sure that the UN is not in control of regulation of the Internet and a bill with, uh, Rob Portman to make sure that we have tariffs in a position that are fair to our manufacturers. Uh, I don’t think that those Republicans are coming to work with me because I’m some kind of left wing whacko and unreasonable person. They’re coming to work with me ’cause they know I’m someone that will work across the aisle.

So, it’s gonna be a pretty stark contrast in this election and I think that’s what it’s gonna be about for Missouri.

Speaking inside the very crowded Independence headquarters.

Senator McCaskill took time to greet everyone in attendance after she spoke in Independence.

Cass County Prosecutor and 4th Congressional District candidate Teresa Hensley (D) at the Harrisonville headquarters.

With a Democratic Party mascot outside the Harrisonville headquarters.

In Harrisonville.

Previously: Sen. Claire McCaskill (D) in Sedalia – July 1, 2012 (July 1, 2012)

The 5th of July

06 Sunday Jul 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

celebration, Independence

The Lee’s Summit Symphony Orchestra performed a two hour concert this evening for an audience numbering approximately five thousand at the annual “Booms and Blooms” celebration held at Powell Gardens (25 miles southeast of Kansas City).  

Barack Obama in Independence, MO: the speech transcript

02 Wednesday Jul 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Barack Obama, Independence, missouri, patriotism, speech

There’s been a lot of discussion on the Internets and in the old media about Barack Obama’s speech on patriotism at the Truman Memorial Building in Independence, Missouri on Monday, June 30th. Yeah, we were there, and here’s our coverage:

Barack Obama in Independence, MO: the preparation

Live from Independence, It’s Barack Obama

Obama in Independence: photos

Obama in Independence: stenography, or what was said and who said it

From Blue Girl, Red State:

Obama in Independence, Missouri – 30 June 2008

Elsewhere, Glenn Greenwald has an interesting take on the big picture:

The Obama campaign’s past two weeks

Some of the discussion has been about what it all means. The transcription elves at our Show Me Progress corporate headquarters have been really busy, and with the help of the “as prepared” text of the speech courtesy of Obama’s campaign, have been able to whip out a transcript of the actual goings on in record time. I’ve provided them below the fold – first, the text of his remarks as prepared, and second, the text of his remarks as delivered.

The prepared text of Barack Obama’s speech as released by his campaign:

Remarks of Senator Barack Obama

The America We Love – as prepared for delivery

Monday, June 30th, 2008

Independence, Missouri

On a spring morning in April of 1775, a simple band of colonists – farmers and merchants, blacksmiths and printers, men and boys – left their homes and families in Lexington and Concord to take up arms against the tyranny of an Empire.  The odds against them were long and the risks enormous – for even if they survived the battle, any ultimate failure would bring charges of treason, and death by hanging.

And yet they took that chance.  They did so not on behalf of a particular tribe or lineage, but on behalf of a larger idea.  The idea of liberty.  The idea of God-given, inalienable rights.  And with the first shot of that fateful day – a shot heard round the world – the American Revolution, and America’s experiment with democracy, began.

Those men of Lexington and Concord were among our first patriots.  And at the beginning of a week when we celebrate the birth of our nation, I think it is fitting to pause for a moment and reflect on the meaning of patriotism – theirs, and ours.  We do so in part because we are in the midst of war – more than one and a half million of our finest young men and women have now fought in Iraq and Afghanistan; over 60,000 have been wounded, and over 4,600 have been laid to rest.  The costs of war have been great, and the debate surrounding our mission in Iraq has been fierce.  It is natural, in light of such sacrifice by so many, to think more deeply about the commitments that bind us to our nation, and to each other.

We reflect on these questions as well because we are in the midst of a presidential election, perhaps the most consequential in generations; a contest that will determine the course of this nation for years, perhaps decades, to come.  Not only is it a debate about big issues – health care, jobs, energy, education, and retirement security – but it is also a debate about values.  How do we keep ourselves safe and secure while preserving our liberties?  How do we restore trust in a government that seems increasingly removed from its people and dominated by special interests?  How do we ensure that in an increasingly global economy, the winners maintain allegiance to the less fortunate?  And how do we resolve our differences at a time of increasing diversity?

Finally, it is worth considering the meaning of patriotism because the question of who is – or is not – a patriot all too often poisons our political debates, in ways that divide us rather than bringing us together.  I have come to know this from my own experience on the campaign trail.  Throughout my life, I have always taken my deep and abiding love for this country as a given.  It was how I was raised; it is what propelled me into public service; it is why I am running for President.  And yet, at certain times over the last sixteen months, I have found, for the first time, my patriotism challenged – at times as a result of my own carelessness, more often as a result of the desire by some to score political points and raise fears about who I am and what I stand for.

So let me say at this at outset of my remarks.  I will never question the patriotism of others in this campaign.  And I will not stand idly by when I hear others question mine.

My concerns here aren’t simply personal, however.  After all, throughout our history, men and women of far greater stature and significance than me have had their patriotism questioned in the midst of momentous debates.  Thomas Jefferson was accused by the Federalists of selling out to the French.  The anti-Federalists were just as convinced that John Adams was in cahoots with the British and intent on restoring monarchal rule.  Likewise, even our wisest Presidents have sought to justify questionable policies on the basis of patriotism.  Adams’ Alien and Sedition Act, Lincoln’s suspension of habeas corpus, Roosevelt’s internment of Japanese Americans – all were defended as expressions of patriotism, and those who disagreed with their policies were sometimes labeled as unpatriotic.

In other words, the use of patriotism as a political sword or a political shield is as old as the Republic.  Still, what is striking about today’s patriotism debate is the degree to which it remains rooted in the culture wars of the 1960s – in arguments that go back forty years or more.  In the early years of the civil rights movement and opposition to the Vietnam War, defenders of the status quo often accused anybody who questioned the wisdom of government policies of being unpatriotic.  Meanwhile, some of those in the so-called counter-culture of the Sixties reacted not merely by criticizing particular government policies, but by attacking the symbols, and in extreme cases, the very idea, of America itself – by burning flags; by blaming America for all that was wrong with the world; and perhaps most tragically, by failing to honor those veterans coming home from Vietnam, something that remains a national shame to this day.

Most Americans never bought into these simplistic world-views – these caricatures of left and right.  Most Americans understood that dissent does not make one unpatriotic, and that there is nothing smart or sophisticated about a cynical disregard for America’s traditions and institutions.  And yet the anger and turmoil of that period never entirely drained away.  All too often our politics still seems trapped in these old, threadbare arguments – a fact most evident during our recent debates about the war in Iraq, when those who opposed administration policy were tagged by some as unpatriotic, and a general providing his best counsel on how to move forward in Iraq was accused of betrayal.

Given the enormous challenges that lie before us, we can no longer afford these sorts of divisions.  None of us expect that arguments about patriotism will, or should, vanish entirely; after all, when we argue about patriotism, we are arguing about who we are as a country, and more importantly, who we should be.  But surely we can agree that no party or political philosophy has a monopoly on patriotism.  And surely w
e can arrive at a definition of patriotism that, however rough and imperfect, captures the best of America’s common spirit.

What would such a definition look like?  For me, as for most Americans, patriotism starts as a gut instinct, a loyalty and love for country rooted in my earliest memories.  I’m not just talking about the recitations of the Pledge of Allegiance or the Thanksgiving pageants at school or the fireworks on the Fourth of July, as wonderful as those things may be.  Rather, I’m referring to the way the American ideal wove its way throughout the lessons my family taught me as a child.

One of my earliest memories is of sitting on my grandfather’s shoulders and watching the astronauts come to shore in Hawaii.  I remember the cheers and small flags that people waved, and my grandfather explaining how we Americans could do anything we set our minds to do.  That’s my idea of America.

I remember listening to my grandmother telling stories about her work on a bomber assembly-line during World War II.  I remember my grandfather handing me his dog-tags from his time in Patton’s Army, and understanding that his defense of this country marked one of his greatest sources of pride.  That’s my idea of America.

I remember, when living for four years in Indonesia as a child, listening to my mother reading me the first lines of the Declaration of Independence – “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal. That they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”  I remember her explaining how this declaration applied to every American, black and white and brown alike; how those words, and words of the United States Constitution, protected us from the injustices that we witnessed other people suffering during those years abroad.  That’s my idea of America.

As I got older, that gut instinct – that America is the greatest country on earth – would survive my growing awareness of our nation’s imperfections: it’s ongoing racial strife; the perversion of our political system laid bare during the Watergate hearings; the wrenching poverty of the Mississippi Delta and the hills of Appalachia.  Not only because, in my mind, the joys of American life and culture, its vitality, its variety and its freedom, always outweighed its imperfections, but because I learned that what makes America great has never been its perfection but the belief that it can be made better.  I came to understand that our revolution was waged for the sake of that belief – that we could be governed by laws, not men; that we could be equal in the eyes of those laws; that we could be free to say what we want and assemble with whomever we want and worship as we please; that we could have the right to pursue our individual dreams but the obligation to help our fellow citizens pursue theirs.

For a young man of mixed race, without firm anchor in any particular community, without even a father’s steadying hand, it is this essential American idea – that we are not constrained by the accident of birth but can make of our lives what we will – that has defined my life, just as it has defined the life of so many other Americans.

That is why, for me, patriotism is always more than just loyalty to a place on a map or a certain kind of people.  Instead, it is also loyalty to America’s ideals – ideals for which anyone can sacrifice, or defend, or give their last full measure of devotion.  I believe it is this loyalty that allows a country teeming with different races and ethnicities, religions and customs, to come together as one.  It is the application of these ideals that separate us from Zimbabwe, where the opposition party and their supporters have been silently hunted, tortured or killed; or Burma, where tens of thousands continue to struggle for basic food and shelter in the wake of a monstrous storm because a military junta fears opening up the country to outsiders; or Iraq, where despite the heroic efforts of our military, and the courage of many ordinary Iraqis, even limited cooperation between various factions remains far too elusive.

I believe those who attack America’s flaws without acknowledging the singular greatness of our ideals, and their proven capacity to inspire a better world, do not truly understand America.

Of course, precisely because America isn’t perfect, precisely because our ideals constantly demand more from us, patriotism can never be defined as loyalty to any particular leader or government or policy.  As Mark Twain, that greatest of American satirists and proud son of Missouri, once wrote, “Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.”  We may hope that our leaders and our government stand up for our ideals, and there are many times in our history when that’s occurred.  But when our laws, our leaders or our government are out of alignment with our ideals, then the dissent of ordinary Americans may prove to be one of the truest expression of patriotism.

The young preacher from Georgia, Martin Luther King, Jr., who led a movement to help America confront our tragic history of racial injustice and live up to the meaning of our creed – he was a patriot.  The young soldier who first spoke about the prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib – he is a patriot.  Recognizing a wrong being committed in this country’s name; insisting that we deliver on the promise of our Constitution – these are the acts of patriots, men and women who are defending that which is best in America.  And we should never forget that – especially when we disagree with them; especially when they make us uncomfortable with their words.

Beyond a loyalty to America’s ideals, beyond a willingness to dissent on behalf of those ideals, I also believe that patriotism must, if it is to mean anything, involve the willingness to sacrifice – to give up something we value on behalf of a larger cause.  For those who have fought under the flag of this nation – for the young veterans I meet when I visit Walter Reed; for those like John McCain who have endured physical torment in service to our country – no further proof of such sacrifice is necessary.  And let me also add that no one should ever devalue that service, especially for the sake of a political campaign, and that goes for supporters on both sides.

We must always express our profound gratitude for the service of our men and women in uniform.  Period.  Indeed, one of the good things to emerge from the current conflict in Iraq has been the widespread recognition that whether you support this war or oppose it, the sacrifice of our troops is always worthy of honor.

For the rest of us – for those of us not in uniform or without loved ones in the military – the call to sacrifice for the country’s greater good remains an imperative of citizenship.  Sadly, in recent years, in the midst of war on two fronts, this call to service never came.  After 9/11, we were asked to shop.  The wealthiest among us saw their tax obligations decline, even as the costs of war continued to mount.  Rather than work together to reduce our dependence on foreign oil, and thereby lessen our vulnerability to a volatile region, our energy policy remained unchanged, and our oil dependence only grew.

In spite of this absence of leadership from Washington, I have seen a new generation of Americans begin to take up the call.  I meet them everywhere I go, young people involved in the project of American renewal; not only those who have signed up to fight for our country in distant lands, but those who are fighting for a better America here at home, by teaching in underserved schools, or caring for the sick in understaffed hospitals, or promoting more sustainable energy policies in their local communities.

I believe one of the tasks of the next Administration is to ensure that this movement towards service grows and sustains itself in the years to come.  We
should expand AmeriCorps and grow the Peace Corps.  We should encourage national service by making it part of the requirement for a new college assistance program, even as we strengthen the benefits for those whose sense of duty has already led them to serve in our military.

We must remember, though, that true patriotism cannot be forced or legislated with a mere set of government programs.  Instead, it must reside in the hearts of our people, and cultivated in the heart of our culture, and nurtured in the hearts of our children.

As we begin our fourth century as a nation, it is easy to take the extraordinary nature of America for granted.  But it is our responsibility as Americans and as parents to instill that history in our children, both at home and at school.  The loss of quality civic education from so many of our classrooms has left too many young Americans without the most basic knowledge of who our forefathers are, or what they did, or the significance of the founding documents that bear their names.  Too many children are ignorant of the sheer effort, the risks and sacrifices made by previous generations, to ensure that this country survived war and depression; through the great struggles for civil, and social, and worker’s rights.

It is up to us, then, to teach them.  It is up to us to teach them that even though we have faced great challenges and made our share of mistakes, we have always been able to come together and make this nation stronger, and more prosperous, and more united, and more just.  It is up to us to teach them that America has been a force for good in the world, and that other nations and other people have looked to us as the last, best hope of Earth.  It is up to us to teach them that it is good to give back to one’s community; that it is honorable to serve in the military; that it is vital to participate in our democracy and make our voices heard.

And it is up to us to teach our children a lesson that those of us in politics too often forget: that patriotism involves not only defending this country against external threat, but also working constantly to make America a better place for future generations.

When we pile up mountains of debt for the next generation to absorb, or put off changes to our energy policies, knowing full well the potential consequences of inaction, we are placing our short-term interests ahead of the nation’s long-term well-being.  When we fail to educate effectively millions of our children so that they might compete in a global economy, or we fail to invest in the basic scientific research that has driven innovation in this country, we risk leaving behind an America that has fallen in the ranks of the world.  Just as patriotism involves each of us making a commitment to this nation that extends beyond our own immediate self-interest, so must that commitment extends beyond our own time here on earth.

Our greatest leaders have always understood this.  They’ve defined patriotism with an eye toward posterity.  George Washington is rightly revered for his leadership of the Continental Army, but one of his greatest acts of patriotism was his insistence on stepping down after two terms, thereby setting a pattern for those that would follow, reminding future presidents that this is a government of and by and for the people.

Abraham Lincoln did not simply win a war or hold the Union together.  In his unwillingness to demonize those against whom he fought; in his refusal to succumb to either the hatred or self-righteousness that war can unleash; in his ultimate insistence that in the aftermath of war the nation would no longer remain half slave and half free; and his trust in the better angels of our nature – he displayed the wisdom and courage that sets a standard for patriotism.

And it was the most famous son of Independence, Harry S Truman, who sat in the White House during his final days in office and said in his Farewell Address: “When Franklin Roosevelt died, I felt there must be a million men better qualified than I, to take up the Presidential task…But through all of it, through all the years I have worked here in this room, I have been well aware than I did not really work alone – that you were working with me.  No President could ever hope to lead our country, or to sustain the burdens of this office, save the people helped with their support.”

In the end, it may be this quality that best describes patriotism in my mind – not just a love of America in the abstract, but a very particular love for, and faith in, the American people.  That is why our heart swells with pride at the sight of our flag; why we shed a tear as the lonely notes of Taps sound.  For we know that the greatness of this country – its victories in war, its enormous wealth, its scientific and cultural achievements – all result from the energy and imagination of the American people; their toil, drive, struggle, restlessness, humor and quiet heroism.

That is the liberty we defend – the liberty of each of us to pursue our own dreams.  That is the equality we seek – not an equality of results, but the chance of every single one of us to make it if we try.  That is the community we strive to build – one in which we trust in this sometimes messy democracy of ours, one in which we continue to insist that there is nothing we cannot do when we put our mind to it, one in which we see ourselves as part of a larger story, our own fates wrapped up in the fates of those who share allegiance to America’s happy and singular creed.

Thank you, God Bless you, and may God Bless the United States of America.

###

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Monday, June 30, 2008

Contact: Obama Press Office; (xxx) xxx-xxxx

What Barack Obama actually said:

Remarks of Senator Barack Obama

The America We Love – as delivered

Monday, June 30th, 2008

Independence, Missouri

[cheers][applause] Thank you Independence. Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you so much  [garbled]. It is good to be in Independence, Missouri. I want to begin by expressing my deep gratitude to Vincel Gunther [sp] not only for his wonderful introduction, but more importantly, for his service to our country. Please give Vince a…[applause]

I also just want to acknowledge some wonderful public servants who are here,  Congressman Emanuel Cleaver [cheers] [applause], Congressman Ike Skelton [cheers][applause], Jackson County Executive Mike Sanders [cheers][applause], State Senator Jolie Justus [cheers][applause] and State Treasurer Susan Montee, a great friend of mine who has been working tirelessly on our campaign. [applause] And I also want to make sure that I mentioned a few friends who could not be here today, your wonderful U.S. Senator, Claire McCaskill [cheers] [applause], for the jayhawks in the audience, a great supporter, Governor Kathleen Sebelius, [cheers][applause], and Attorney General Jay Nixon. [cheers][applause]

On a spring morning in April of 1775, a simple band of colonists – farmers and merchants, blacksmiths and printers, men and boys – left their homes and their families in Lexington and Concord to take up arms against the tyranny of an Empire.  The odds against them were long and the risks enormous – for even if they survived that particular battle, any ultimate failure would bring charges of treason, and death by hanging.

And yet they took that chance.  They did so not on behalf of a particular tribe or lineage, but on behalf of a larger idea.  The idea of liberty.  The idea of God-given, inalienable rights.  And with the first shot of that fateful day – a shot heard round the world that was fired – the American Revolution, and America’s experiment with democracy, began.

Those men of Lexington and Concord were among our first patriots.  And at the beginning of a week when we cel
ebrate the birth of our nation, I think it’s fitting to pause for a moment and reflect on the meaning of patriotism – theirs, and ours.  We do so in part because we are in the midst of war – more than one and a half million of our finest young men and women have now fought in Iraq and Afghanistan; over 60,000 have been wounded, and over 4,600 have been laid to rest.  The costs of war have been great, and the debate surrounding our mission in Iraq has been fierce.  It’s natural, in light of such sacrifice by so many, to think more deeply about the commitments that bind us together as a nation, and bind us to each other as well.

We reflect on these questions also because we are in the midst of a presidential election, perhaps the most consequential in generations; a contest that will determine the course of this nation for years, perhaps decades, to come.  Not only is it a debate about big issues – health care, jobs, energy, education, retirement security – but it’s also a debate about values.  How do we keep ourselves safe and secure while preserving our liberties?  How do we restore trust in a government that seems increasingly removed from its people and dominated by special interests?  How do we ensure that in an increasingly global economy, the winners maintain allegiance to the less fortunate?  And how do we resolve our differences at a time of increasing diversity?

Finally, it’s worth considering the meaning of patriotism because the question of who is – or is not – a patriot all too often poisons our political debates, in ways that divide us rather than bring us together.  I have come to know this from my own experience on the campaign trail.  Throughout my life, I have always taken my deep and abiding love for this country as a given.  It was how I was raised; it is what propelled me into public service; it is why I am running for President.  And yet, at certain times over the last sixteen months, I have found, for the first time, my patriotism challenged – at times as a result of my own carelessness, more often as a result of the desire by some to score political points and raise fears and doubts about who I am and what I stand for.

So let me say at this at outset of my remarks.  I will never question the patriotism of others in this campaign. [applause][cheers] And I will not stand idly by when I hear others question mine. [cheers][applause]

My concerns here aren’t simply personal, however.  After all, throughout our history, men and women of far greater significance and stature than me have had their patriotism questioned in the midst of momentous debates.  Thomas Jefferson was accused by the Federalists of selling out to the French.  The anti-Federalists were just as convinced that John Adams was in cahoots with the British and intent on restoring monarchal rule.  Likewise, even our wisest Presidents have sought sometimes to justify questionable practices on the basis of patriotism.  Adams’ Alien and Sedition Act, Lincoln’s suspension of habeas corpus, Roosevelt’s internment of Japanese Americans during World War II – all were defended at the time as expressions of patriotism, and those who disagreed with their policies were sometimes labeled as unpatriotic.

In other words, the use of patriotism as a political sword or a political shield is as old as the Republic.  Still, what’s striking about today’s patriotism debate is the degree to which it remains rooted in the culture wars of the 1960s – in arguments that go back forty years or more.  Some of you remember this, in the early years of the civil rights movement and the opposition to the Vietnam War, defenders of the status quo often accused anybody who questioned the wisdom of government policies of being unpatriotic.  Meanwhile, some of those in the so-called counter-culture of the Sixties reacted not merely by criticizing particular government policies, but by attacking the symbols, and in extreme cases, the very idea, of America itself – by burning flags; by blaming America for all that was wrong with the world; and perhaps most tragically, by failing to honor those veterans coming home from Vietnam, something that remains a national shame to this day. [applause]

Now, most Americans never bought into these simplistic world-views – these caricatures of left and right.  Most Americans understood that dissent does not make one unpatriotic [applause], and most Americans understand that there is nothing smart or sophisticated about a cynical disregard for America’s traditions and institutions [applause]. And yet, and yet the anger and turmoil of that period never entirely drained away.  All too often our politics still seems trapped in these old, threadbare arguments – a fact most evident during our recent debates about the war in Iraq, when those who opposed administration policy were tagged by some as unpatriotic, and a general providing his best counsel on how to move forward in Iraq was accused of betrayal.

Given the enormous challenges that lie before us, we can no longer afford these sorts of divisions.  None of us expect that arguments about patriotism will, or should, vanish entirely; after all, when we argue about patriotism, we are arguing about who we are as a country, and more importantly, who we should be.  But surely we can agree that no party or political philosophy has a monopoly on patriotism. [cheers][applause] And surely we can arrive at a definition of patriotism that, however rough and imperfect, captures the best of America’s common spirit.

What would such a definition look like?  For me, as for most Americans, patriotism starts as a gut instinct, a loyalty and love for country that’s rooted in some of my earliest memories.  I’m not just talking about the recitations of the Pledge of Allegiance or the Thanksgiving pageants at school or the same fireworks on the Fourth of July that we just heard from earlier from Vince. Rather, as wonderful as those things may be, I’m referring to the way the American ideal wove its way throughout the lessons my family. Lessons that my family taught me as a child.

You know one of my earliest memories is of sitting on my grandfather’s shoulders and watching the astronauts come to shore in Hawaii.  I remember the cheers and small flags that people waved, and my grandfather explaining how we Americans could do anything we set our minds to do.  That’s my idea of America. [cheers][applause]

I remember listening to my grandmother telling stories about her work on a bomber assembly-line during World War II.  I remember my grandfather handing me his dog-tags from his time in Patton’s Army, and understanding that his defense of this country marked one of his greatest sources of pride.  That’s my idea of America.

I remember [applause], I remember when living for four years in Indonesia as a child, I listened to my mother reading me the first lines of the Declaration of Independence – “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal. [applause] That they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”  I remember her explaining how this declaration applied to every American, black and white and brown alike; how those words, and the words of the United States Constitution, protected us from the injustices that we witnessed other people suffering during those years abroad.  That’s my idea of America. [applause]

As I got older, that gut instinct that so many of us have – that America is the greatest country on earth [applause] – would survive, that, that, that gut instinct, that knowledge would survive my growing awareness of our nation’s imperfections: it’s ongoing racial strife; the perversions of our political system laid bare during the Watergate hearings; the wrenching poverty of the Mississippi Delta and the hills of Appalachia and inner cities and rural communities all across America.  That instinct that this is the greate
st country on earth survived not only because, in my mind, the joys of American life and culture, its vitality, its variety, its freedom, always outweighed its imperfections, but because I learned that what makes America great has never been its perfection but the belief that it can be made better.  I came to understand that our revolution was waged for the sake of that belief – that we could be governed by laws, not men; that we could be equal in the eyes of those laws; that we could be free to say what we want and assemble with whomever we want and worship as we please; that we could have the right to pursue our individual dreams but the obligation to help our fellow citizens pursue theirs. There are…[applause]

For a young man like me, of mixed race, without firm anchor in any particular community, without even a father’s steadying hand, it is this essential American idea – that we are not constrained by the accident of birth but can make of our lives what we will – that has defined my life [voice: “Yeah.”], just as it has defined the life of so many other Americans. [cheers][applause]

That’s why, for me, patriotism is always more than just loyalty to a place on a map or a certain kind of people.  Instead, it’s also loyalty to America’s ideals – ideals for which anyone can sacrifice, or defend, or give their last full measure of devotion.  I believe it is this loyalty that allows a country teeming with different races and ethnicities, religions and customs, to come together as one.  It is the application of these ideals that separates us from Zimbabwe, where the opposition party and their supporters have been silently hunted, tortured or killed; it separates us from Burma, where tens of thousands continue to struggle for basic food and shelter in the wake of a monstrous storm because a military junta fears opening up the country to outsiders; or Iraq, where despite the heroic efforts of our military – men and women like Vince, and the courage of many ordinary Iraqis, even limited cooperation between various factions remains far too elusive.

I believe those who attack America’s flaws without acknowledging the singular greatness of our ideals, and their proven capacity to inspire a better world, do not truly understand America. [applause]

Of course, precisely because America isn’t perfect, precisely because our ideals constantly demand more from us, patriotism can never be defined as loyalty to any particular leader or government or policy.  As ,[applause] as Mark Twain, that greatest of American satirists and proud son of Missouri, once wrote, “Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.” [cheers][applause] Now, we may hope that our leaders and our government stand up for our ideals, stand up for what’s right, and there are many times in our history when that’s occurred.  But when our laws, when our leaders or our government are out of alignment with those ideals, then the dissent of ordinary Americans may prove to be one of the truest expression of patriotism. [cheers][applause]

The young preacher from Georgia, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., who led a movement to help America confront our tragic history of racial injustice and live up to the meaning of our creed – he was a patriot.  The young soldier who first spoke about the prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib – he is a patriot. [cheers][applause]  Recognizing a wrong being committed in this country’s name; insisting that we deliver on the promise of our Constitution – these are the acts of patriots, [applause] men and women who are defending that which is best in America.  And we should never forget that – especially when we disagree with them; especially when they make us uncomfortable with their words. That’s part of the American tradition. That’s part of why we are proud to be Americans.

Beyond a loyalty to America’s ideals, beyond a willingness to dissent on behalf of those ideals, I also believe that patriotism must, if it is to mean anything, involve the willingness to sacrifice – to give up something we value on behalf of a larger cause.  And for those who have fought under the flag of this nation – for the young veterans like Vince, the young veterans I meet when I visit Walter Reed; for those like John McCain who have endured physical torment in service to our country – no further proof of such sacrifice is necessary.  And let me also add that no one should ever devalue that service, [applause] especially for the sake of a political campaign, and that goes for supporters on both sides.

We must always express our profound gratitude for the service of our men and women in uniform.  Period. Full stop. [cheers][applause] Indeed, one of, one of the good things to emerge from the current conflict in Iraq has been the widespread recognition that whether you support this war or oppose it, the sacrifice of our troops is always worthy of honor. That’s a change from the sixties. That’s been very welcome to many of us.

But, you know, for the rest of us – for those of us not in uniform or without loved ones in the military – the call to service for the country’s greater good remains an imperative of citizenship.  Sadly, in recent years, in the midst of war on two fronts, this call to service never came.  After 9/11, we were asked to shop.  The wealthiest among us saw their tax obligations decline, something that had never occurred before during wartime, even as the costs of war continue to mount.  Rather than work together to reduce our dependence on foreign oil, and thereby lessen our vulnerability to a volatile region, our energy policy remained unchanged, and our oil dependence only grew.

In spite of this absence of leadership from Washington, I have seen a new generation of Americans begin to take up the call.  I meet them everywhere I go, young people involved in the project of American renewal; not only those who have signed up to fight for our country in distant lands, but those who are fighting for a better America right here at home, by reaching out to those who are less fortunate, by teaching in underserved schools, or caring for the sick in understaffed hospitals, or promoting more sustainable energy policies in their local communities. [applause]

I believe one of the tasks of the next Administration is to ensure that this movement towards service grows and sustains itself in the years to come.  We should expand AmeriCorps and grow the Peace Corps.  We should encourage national service by making it part of the requirement for a new college assistance program, even as we strengthen [applause] the benefits for those whose sense of duty has already led them to serve in our military.

So government can do it’s part. We must remember, though, that true patriotism cannot be forced or legislated with a mere set of government programs.  Instead, it must reside in the hearts of our people, and cultivated in the heart of our culture, and nurtured in the hearts of our children. [applause]

As we begin, as we begin our fourth century as a nation, it is easy to take the extraordinary nature of America for granted.  But it is our responsibility as Americans and as parents to instill that history in our children, both at home and at school.  The loss of quality civic education from so many of our classrooms has left too many young Americans without the most basic knowledge of who our forefathers are, [applause] or what they did, or the significance of the founding documents that bear their names.  Too many children are ignorant of the sheer effort, the risks and sacrifices made by previous generations, to ensure that this country survived war and depression; through the great struggles of civil, and social, and worker’s rights.

It is up to us, then, to teach them.  It is up to us to teach them that even though we have faced great challenges and made our share of mistakes, we have always been able to come together and make this nation stronger, and more prosperous, and more united, and more j
ust.  It’s up to us to teach them that America has been a force for good in the world, and that other nations and other people have looked to us as the last, best hope on Earth.  It is up to us to teach them that it is good to give back to one’s community; that it is honorable to serve in the military [applause]; that it is vital to participate in our democracy and make our voices heard.

And it is up to us to teach our children a lesson that those of us in politics too often forget: that patriotism involves not only defending this country against external threat, but also working constantly to make America a better place for future generations. [applause]

When we pile up mountains of debt for the next generation to absorb, or put off changes to our energy policies, knowing full well the potential consequences of inaction, we are placing our short-term interests ahead of the nation’s long-term well-being.  When we fail to educate effectively millions of our children so that they might compete in a global economy, or we fail to invest in the basic scientific research that has driven innovation in this country, we risk leaving behind an America that has fallen in the ranks of the world.  Just as patriotism involves each of us making a commitment to this nation that extends beyond our own individual immediate self-interest, so must that commitment extend beyond our own time here on earth.

Our greatest leaders have always understood this.  They’ve defined patriotism with an eye toward posterity.  George Washington is rightly revered for his leadership of the Continental Army, but one of his greatest acts of patriotism was his insistence on stepping down after two terms, thereby setting a pattern for those that would follow, reminding future presidents that this is a government of and by and for the people. [cheers][applause]

Abraham, Abraham Lincoln did not simply win a war or hold the Union together.  In his unwillingness to demonize those against whom he fought; in his refusal to succumb to either the hatred or self-righteousness that war can unleash; in his ultimate insistence that in the aftermath of war the nation would no longer remain half slave and half free; and his trust in the better angels of our nature – Lincoln displayed the wisdom and courage that sets a standard for patriotism.

And it was the most famous son of Independence, Harry S Truman, who sat in the White House during his final days in office and said in his Farewell Address: “When Franklin Roosevelt died, I felt there must be millions, a million men better qualified than I, to take up the Presidential task…But through all of it, through all the years I have worked here in this room, I have been well aware than I did not really work alone – that you were working with me.  No President could ever hope to lead our country, or to sustain the burdens of this office, save the people helped with their support.”

In the end, [applause]  that’s what Truman said. And in the end it may be this quality that best describes patriotism in my mind – not just a love of America in the abstract, but a very particular love for, and faith in, the American people.  That’s why our heart swells with pride at the sight of our flag; why we shed a tear as the lonely notes of Taps sound.  For we know that the greatness of this country – its victories in war, its enormous wealth, its scientific and cultural achievements – all result from the energy and imagination of the American people; their toil, drive, struggle, their restlessness, humor and quiet heroism.

That’s the liberty we defend – the liberty of each of us to pursue our own dreams.  That’s the equality we seek – not an equality of results, but the chance of every single one of us to make it if we try.  [voice: “Yeah.”] That’s the community we strive to build – one in which we trust in this sometimes messy democracy of ours, one in which we continue to insist that there is nothing we cannot do when we put our mind to it, one in which we see ourselves as part of a larger story, our own fates wrapped up in the fates of those who share allegiance to America’s happy and singular creed. [applause] That’s what they [garbled].

Thank you, God Bless you, and may God Bless the United States of America. [cheers][applause]

And that’s the way it was…

Obama in Independence: stenography, or what was said and who said it

01 Tuesday Jul 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Barack Obama, Independence, media criticism, missouri

Our old traditional media does such a splendid job. Okay, not really.

For those of you who are wondering what the title of this is all about, Barack Obama spoke on patriotism in Independence, Missouri yesterday.

A portion of the prepared text of Barack Obama’s speech as released by his campaign:

…So let me say at this at outset of my remarks.  I will never question the patriotism of others in this campaign.  And I will not stand idly by when I hear others question mine.

My concerns here aren’t simply personal, however.  After all, throughout our history, men and women of far greater stature and significance than me have had their patriotism questioned in the midst of momentous debates.  Thomas Jefferson was accused by the Federalists of selling out to the French.  The anti-Federalists were just as convinced that John Adams was in cahoots with the British and intent on restoring monarchal rule.  Likewise, even our wisest Presidents have sought to justify questionable policies on the basis of patriotism.  Adams’ Alien and Sedition Act, Lincoln’s suspension of habeas corpus, Roosevelt’s internment of Japanese Americans – all were defended as expressions of patriotism, and those who disagreed with their policies were sometimes labeled as unpatriotic.

In other words, the use of patriotism as a political sword or a political shield is as old as the Republic…

[emphasis added]

Here’s what the traditional media said what Obama said:

…Mon, Jun. 30, 2008 10:15 PM

Obama stresses patriotism on visit to Independence

By STEVE KRASKE

The Kansas City Star

…Obama’s defense of his own patriotism included a series of historical footnotes in which he noted that Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Abraham Lincoln and Franklin Roosevelt all heard their patriotism questioned during their administrations…

tiny URL

I read that in this morning’s dead trees edition of the paper (the story was on the front page) and thought to myself, “Wait a minute, I was there, I don’t remember it quite that way.” Lucky for me I had my handy dandy digital audio recorder (standard new media operating equipment) with me. And this time I remembered to switch on the microphone.

This is what I recorded:

…After all, throughout our history, men and women of far greater significance and stature than me have had their patriotism questioned in the midst of momentous debates.  Thomas Jefferson was accused by the Federalists of selling out to the French.  The anti-Federalists were just as convinced that John Adams was in cahoots with the British and intent on restoring monarchal rule.  Likewise, even our wisest Presidents have sought sometimes to justify questionable policies on the basis of patriotism.  Adams’ Alien and Sedition Act, Lincoln’s suspension of habeas corpus, Roosevelt’s internment of Japanese Americans during World War II – all were defended at the time as expressions of patriotism, and those who disagreed with their policies were sometimes labeled as unpatriotic.

In other words, the use of patriotism as a political sword or a political shield is as old as the Republic…

[emphasis added]

Uh, there are two separate thoughts going on here, let’s not try to conflate them. Patriotism is sometimes used as “a sword” and sometimes it’s used as “a shield”. So, FDR’s internment of Japanese Americans is one of those sword thingies. His patriotism wasn’t attacked (well, at least in the context of Obama’s speech). Roosevelt was justifying a questionable policy – he was an actor, not the recipient. You wouldn’t know that was what was said from reading the account in the Star.

Yeah, it’s a fine point. But shouldn’t we expect more than soundbite depth in the coverage of our political discourse?

Okay, was our stenographer paying attention, or was he just hanging around the local public radio station banner hoping to get his picture taken by a blogger with an attitude?

It looks like I’m going to have to transcribe the entire speech. Sigh.

Obama in Independence: photos

01 Tuesday Jul 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Barack Obama, images, Independence, missouri

As I approached the press entrance to the Truman Memorial Building I stopped to take a photo of the media trucks. This very nice lady stopped and asked me, “Are you with the Kansas City Star?” I replied that I was not, I was a blogger. She then asked me, “Would you like to take my picture with my husband he’s just around the corner?” I thought, “Why not?” and told her I would. As we walked back to the line of people around the corner I asked her if she had ever been to an event like this before. She replied, “No, never before. This is historic.” We found her husband in line and I took this photo. They reminded me of my parents.

I waited my turn to go through security at the press entrance. The uniformed officer had me take out and start up all of my electronic equipment, including my camera. As he peered through the viewfinder he took this photo. He quipped to me, “If you publish this I should get credit.” He’s got it.

Congressman Ike Skelton and Congressman Emanuel Cleaver II in front of the press area as we all waited for Obama to arrive.

Jackson County Executive Mike Sanders in front of the press area. Ike Skelton, Emanuel Cleaver and Mike Sanders are delegates to the DNC who publicly supported Hillary Clinton’s candidacy.

The little girl in the foreground was fascinated by the press table and the crowd behind her.

The “blue ticket” area in front of the press riser.

The “red ticket” area behind the press.

The lighting in the hall was quite good until they discovered that the overhead lights were causing glare on the teleprompter. The electrician was told to turn out the overhead lights (before Obama arrived). A credentialed video photographer in the balconey went ballistic because of the low light. I alternated between slow shutter speeds without flash and flash with varying degrees of success.

A credentialed member of the press shows me an I-phone photo taken at the rope line shortly after Obama finished his speech.

A local television reporter prepares for a “stand up” outside the hall as the crowd exited the hall.

This individual stood alone studying the memorial after she had left the hall.

Recent Posts

  • “Show me your papers. Pull down your pants.”
  • Never met a Fascist conspiracy theory he didn’t like
  • Cymbal clapper
  • Uh, in case you were wondering, land doesn’t vote
  • Show us on your diploma where the professors hurt you…

Recent Comments

Winning at losing… on Passing the gas – Donald…
TACO Tuesday | Show… on TACO or Mushrooms?
TACO Tuesday | Show… on So much winning
So much winning | Sh… on Passing the gas – Donald…
What good is the 25t… on We are the only people on the…

Archives

  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,041,517 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

 

Loading Comments...