• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Monthly Archives: March 2017

Us: “You can’t have four seasons in one week.” Missouri: “Hold my beer…”

11 Saturday Mar 2017

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

missouri, snow, weather

Today in west central Missouri:

March snow.

Trumpcare is bad but Trump hopes you won’t notice how bad it is if he talks about Obamacare instead

10 Friday Mar 2017

Posted by willykay in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

ACA, AHCA, Donald Trump, healthcare, Obamacare, Trumpcare

I got the missive below in my email yesterday – Donald Trump’s first effort to come out swinging in favor of Paul Ryan’s Dump and Dupe Obamacare replacement. Notice that the staffers doing the President’s thinking White House’s healthcare PR outreach don’t have much to say about Trumpcare (a.k.a. Ryancare, the American Health Care Act or the AHCA) – which is understandable since the only parties that don’t hold Trumpcare in contempt are the bill’s two sponsors and Paul Ryan – and evidently Donald Trump who tweeted that it’s “wonderful” regardless of the fact that it violates every promise he made to his supporters about replacing Obamacare with something better.

So what do you do when you haven’t really got anything nice to say about the program you’re offering as a replacement for Obamacare? Why you keep on trashing Obamacare. You blast out emails like the one below – which I have presented below in sections annotated with italicized interpositions pointing out the more obvious lies and half-truths:

It’s been seven years since Obamacare was passed, and now, more than ever, we are seeing the harmful effects of this disastrous law.

Obamacare (ACA) insured 20 million previously uninsured people through Medicaid expansion and in the private individual health care market through the exchanges. It enacted a tax on those earning over $200,000/yr that shored up the Medicare system, extending its life by four years at this point – a gain that will be lost if the ACA is repealed in favor of the AHCA which eliminates that high-income tax. Some harmful effects!

Obamacare has led to higher costs and fewer health insurance options for millions of hard-working Americans. Independent analysis found 41 states faced higher average healthcare deductibles last year, with 17 states facing double-digit rate increases. Nearly one in five Americans have only one insurer offering Obamacare exchange plans.

In just the past year, Obamacare premiums have increased by 25 percent on the typical plan and coverage choices have dropped by 28 percent as insurers have left the market.

Obamacare did not negatively affect costs for those who receive insurance through their employers; in fact, it slowed the increasing price trajectory in the pre-Obamacare insurance industry. Premiums were rising by an average of 10% a year before Obamacare – and those who had serious illnesses could be charged considerably more – a practice that Obamacare ended. While premiums for those on the exchanges did increase considerably in 2017, the increase was offset by increased subsidies based on income – and consumers were able to use the exchanges to find competitive alternative insurers.

Things are only getting worse. This past year, nearly 20 million American citizens opted not to get healthcare insurance, with 6.5 million paying the penalty and millions more asking for a hardship exemption from the penalty.

Over 48 million people were uninsured before the major provisions of Obamacare took effect. Those with preexisting conditions can get affordable insurance and don’t face lifetime caps thanks to Obamacare. Seems like things have gotten better, not worse.

A higher penalty for refusing to buy insurance, along with more generous subsidies would have brought more younger, healthier people into the exchanges, which would, in turn, have incentivized more insurers to remain in the exchange. Republicans, however, refused to consider fixing these obvious problems. Congress could still decide to fix Obamacare instead of replacing it with the vastly inferior AHCA – a much worse system that will cost more and provide less – or nothing in many cases. But, given the GOP adherence to ideology over pragmatic policy, it’s not likely that a Republican-dominated congress would ever act to make the system better instead of worse

Americans were promised that Obamacare would bring down healthcare costs — that promise was broken. Americans were promised they could keep their healthcare plans under Obamacare – that promise was broken. Americans were promised that Obamacare would not raise taxes on the middle-class – that promise was broken.
The American people want change and President Donald J. Trump promised to repeal and replace this disaster. That is exactly what the President is working with Congress to achieve. Step up and support the repeal and replacement of Obamacare.

Obamacare did slow the growth of healthcare costs as we noted above. Its subsidies made insurance affordable for many in the individual market. Politifact rated the claim that Obamacare raised taxes on the middle class “mostly false,” noting that a few minor associated taxes, like those on tanning salons, might affect the middle class.

Obamacare had problems to be sure – but in most instances they could easily be fixed if Republican in congress were willing to work in good faith with Democrats to insure the program’s success.

So what about Trumpcare? Estimates are that it could leave more than 15,000 people who are currently insured under Obamacare without coverage, cause premiums to raise for even those in the employer-based market, and perhaps ultimately destroy the entire individual market. Pretty clear why the White House doesn’t want to talk about Trumpcare, but prefers to resort to the type of lies about Obamacare they’ve been peddling for the past seven years. Nancy LeTourneau best describes what we get in Trump’s surrender to the Republican ideology that he has ipso facto endorsed – despite his earlier promises to do the opposite:

This embrace of ideology over competence is exactly how we’ve arrived at a post-truth era. An abandonment of facts/data coupled with emotional appeals (often based on lies) have been the tools used to promote ideology. The Republican Party remains devoid of any principles based on the pragmatism of what works. It is possible that, in their zeal, they will be able to destroy Obamacare and maybe even pass their massive tax cuts for the most wealthy among us — all while ignoring the facts about what a disaster those policies will be.

*Formatting revised for readability, text with links to White House Web Page eliminated)  (3/11/2017; 11:31)

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): owning Trumpcare

10 Friday Mar 2017

Posted by Michael Bersin in social media

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

4th Congressional Ditrict, Donald Trump.Trumpcare, Misouri, Vicky Hartzler

From Charles P. Pierce at Esquire:

Paul Ryan Doesn’t Know How Insurance Works
But he’s got his sleeves rolled up, so watch out.
[….]
I had thought that the burlesque comic opera The Agony of Paul Ryan, Genius had closed on the night in 2012 when Joe Biden laughed the zombie-eyed granny starver off the stage during their debate. (That was the night that Ryan demonstrated that he knew it snowed in Afghanistan in the winter.) But I had not reckoned with his many fanboys among the kept political press. He ascended to become Speaker of the House, largely because nobody else wanted the job after John Boehner got kicked to the curb by the crazy people.

Now he is out there pimping the dungheap that is the new healthcare reform bill as though Mitch and Murray from downtown were lighting his pants on fire. He even lost the suit coat and broke out the PowerPoint on Thursday. It was like watching something on cable access late at night, or a flop-sweaty rookie substitute teacher, and it was hilarious—except for the parts where people will lose their health insurance and die, of course. And this is what he said and, peace be unto Dave Barry, I am not making it up, either:

Paul Ryan said that insurance cannot work if healthy people have to pay more to subsidize the sick.

This is literally how all insurance works. If someone’s house burns down, some of your fire insurance money goes to help that person rebuild. If someone gets sick, some of your premium, healthy person, goes toward that person’s coverage. Increasingly, I have come to believe that Paul Ryan is a not particularly bright creature from another world…

Paul Ryan doesn’t actually believe that. He believes that his party’s right wingnut base doesn’t know any better. And probably a number of members of his caucus.

Representative Vicky Hartzler (r) [2015 file photo].

You Tweet it like this, you own it:

Rep. Vicky Hartzler‏ @RepHartzler
#Obamacare has failed. I’m looking forward to repealing & replacing w/ a patient-centered solution.
[….]
2:08 PM – 9 Mar 2017

Some of the responses:

@RepHartzler #fakenews, you’re looking forward to Paul Ryan’s #Wealthcare that’s just a tax cut for the wealthy.

@RepHartzler You have failed. You have failed to listen to your voters. #wewillremember #doyourjob #trumpcare #crookedVicky #neverTrump

@RepHartzler prove that your solutions would provide more coverage at better rates than existing plan.

Maybe it’ll eventually trickle down.

@RepHartzler Kicking people off healthcare makes you happy?

[….] @RepHartzler Yeah Vick, kicking ppl off of healthcare makes you happy??

Evidently.

@RepHartzler I’ll be glad when we can vote you out in 2018.

There aren’t going to be any open public town halls in the 4th Congressional District with the current representative anytime soon. Like probably never again.

Previously:

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): just checking (February 20, 2017)

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): Well, you asked. (February 21, 2017)

You think Sen. Claire McCaskill (D) has been smiling a lot this week? (February 23, 2017)

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): just a slight indication of what an open public town hall in the district would be like (February 26, 2017)

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): before that Russian thing happened today (March 2, 2017)

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): get used to it (March 8, 2017)

HB 1194 & 1193: the people’s worker’s party

09 Thursday Mar 2017

Posted by Michael Bersin in Missouri General Assembly, Missouri House

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

benefits, General Assembly, HB 1194 & 1193, Jason Chipman, living wage, Minimum wage, missouri, screwing working people

In 2015 the City of St. Louis, by ordinance, established a higher minimum wage than the state. A few people took exception to that. On February 28, 2017 the Missouri Supreme Court ruled that the city can have a higher minimum wage than the one established by the state.

Representative Jason Chipman (r) [2016 file photo].

The right wingnut controlled Missouri House has a low opinion of anyone increasing the minimum wage and acted with alacrity as only they can:

HB 1194  
Prohibits political subdivisions from requiring a minimum wage that exceeds the requirements of state law
Sponsor: Chipman, Jason (120)
Proposed Effective Date: Emergency Clause
LR Number: 2328H.02P
Last Action: 03/09/2017 – Reported to the Senate and First Read (S)
Bill String: HCS HBs 1194 & 1193
[….]
3/01/2017 H 793 Introduced and Read First Time (H)
3/02/2017 H 822 Read Second Time (H)
3/02/2017 H 832 Referred: Rules – Administrative Oversight(H)
3/06/2017 Public Hearing Completed (H)
3/06/2017 Executive Session Completed (H)
3/06/2017 HCS Voted Do Pass (H)
3/06/2017 H 868 HCS Reported Do Pass (H) – AYES: 10 NOES: 4 PRESENT: 0
3/08/2017 H 897 Taken Up
3/08/2017 H 897 Laid Over (H)
3/08/2017 H 905 Taken Up
3/08/2017 H 911 Title of Bill – Agreed To
3/08/2017 H 911 – 912 HCS Adopted (H) – AYES: 109 NOES: 44 PRESENT: 0
3/08/2017 H 912 Perfected with Amendments (H) – HA 1 adopted
3/09/2017 Taken Up
3/09/2017 Third Read and Passed (H)
3/09/2017 Emergency Clause Adopted (H)
3/09/2017 Reported to the Senate and First Read (S)

Well, that was fast. Ten days.

The details:

FIRST REGULAR SESSION
[PERFECTED]
HOUSE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NOS. 1194 & 1193 [pdf]
99TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY

2328H.02P D. ADAM CRUMBLISS, Chief Clerk

AN ACT

To repeal sections 285.055, 288.062, and 290.528, RSMo, and to enact in lieu thereof two new sections relating to the minimum wage, with an emergency clause.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the state of Missouri, as follows:
[….]
2. No political subdivision shall establish, mandate, or otherwise require an employer to provide to an employee:
(1) A minimum or living wage rate; or
(2) Employment benefits
that exceed state laws, rules, or regulations. Sections 290.500 to 290.530 shall preempt and nullify all political subdivision ordinances, rules, and regulations currently in effect or later enacted relating to the establishment or enforcement of a minimum or living wage or the provisions of employment benefits.

[….]

[emphasis in original]

Yep, this from the people’s worker’s party.

Previously:

Missouri Supreme Court: St. Louis can indeed establish a higher minimum wage (February 28, 2017)

Oh, sure, it’s all laughs and giggles…until the bill comes due.

08 Wednesday Mar 2017

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance, Missouri Governor

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

campaign finance, Eric Greitens., Ethics, governor, missouri

Erics Greitens (r) [2016 file photo].

A brand spanking new nonprofit corporation in Missouri:

Name: A New Missouri, Inc.
Address: 105 E High Street
Suite 100
Jefferson City, MO 65101
Type: Nonprofit Corporation
Charter No.: N000704138
Domesticity: Domestic
Registered Agent: Stuerman, Jeff
Status: Good Standing
Date Formed: 2/5/2017

In the filing:

The Corporation shall be organized for the purpose of conducting activities allowed pursuant to the Act, including, but not limited to, the advancement of social welfare by promoting ideas, policies and/or legislation to create more jobs, higher pay, safer streets, better schools, and more, for all Missourians.

You mean like Kansas? Just asking.

You think the “and more” includes better streets and safer schools? Just asking.

They left out mom, apple pie, truth, justice, and the American way. Could be an oversight. Nah.

Well, isn’t this special?:

March 8, 2017 7:00 AM
Nonprofit linked to Greitens raises new questions about ‘dark money,’ ethics
By Jason Hancock
[….]
In the shadow of the Missouri Capitol, just a block from the governor’s mansion, sits the headquarters of a just-started nonprofit called A New Missouri Inc.
[….]
…its focus will be advocating for the governor and his agenda, a Greitens adviser said this week. And because it’s a nonprofit, A New Missouri can accept unlimited contributions and won’t be required to disclose who is giving it money.
[….]

The reviews are coming in:

Tony Messenger‏ @tonymess
Astounding level of secrecy and obfuscation of ethics laws here by @EricGreitens. This is the very definition of what he campaigned against.
[….]
2:37 PM – 8 Mar 2017

“…This is the very definition of what he campaigned against.” The mistake was in believing him then.

Previously:

Campaign Finance: Oh, like they couldn’t come up with another $25,000.00? (July 18, 2016)

Campaign Finance: attempting to follow the money… (October 15, 2016)

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): get used to it

08 Wednesday Mar 2017

Posted by Michael Bersin in social media

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

4th Congressional District, ACA, Misouri, Obamacare, social media, Trumpcare, Twitter, Vicky Hartzler

The republicans in Congress have revealed Trumpcare. They’ve laid an egg.

Representative Vicky Hartzler (r) [2016 file photo].

Via Twitter on Monday, from Representative Vicky Hartzler (r):

Rep. Vicky Hartzler‏ @RepHartzler
Folks all across my district are being hindered by high insurance costs. We can and should do better. #RepealAndReplace
5:29 PM – 6 Mar 2017

Some of the responses:

@RepHartzler If u support the GOP draft bill I just reviewed, u r soooo out of a job come Nov 6, 2018 and it’ll be Hell between now n then

@RepHartzler If that bill is what u meant by “access to health care”, u r totally out of touch w/ your constituents. Oh wait no town halls

@RepHartzler With respect, ma’am, how would you know if you never meet with people from your district?

@RepHartzler I’m in your district, and you have never held a town hall or spent time with your constituents that I can tell.

Hey @RepHartzler – how does screwing them over with HSA plans help them out at all? Oh right, it doesn’t. The replacement is a J-O-K-E

@RepHartzler Meet with the “folks” in your district sometime, you liar.

@RepHartzler do you think HSA’s are a fair or realistic solution for the people of Cass County? Do you know our average household income?

@RepHartzler Better? The new GOP bill favors young and wealthy over elderly and poor. How is that better? Hope you’re ready for a fight.

@RepHartzler, this plan will let ppl die and make rural hospitals fail.

@RepHartzler How will insurance costs go down for those who need it most?

@RepHartzler Once again you leave out the people in your district that ACA helped. LIES MATTER! Read your Bible about them

@RepHartzler Where is the CBO score, which shows cost and how many will lose their insurance and lives? You are not a Christian

@RepHartzler you sure don’t know your district

@RepHartzler The people of Boonville would like to invite you for a townhall on the subject. You name time and place.

That ain’t gonna happen.

Previously:

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): just checking (February 20, 2017)

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): Well, you asked. (February 21, 2017)

You think Sen. Claire McCaskill (D) has been smiling a lot this week? (February 23, 2017)

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): just a slight indication of what an open public town hall in the district would be like (February 26, 2017)

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): before that Russian thing happened today (March 2, 2017)

Roy Blunt will work to pass GOP Dump and Dupe healthcare plan

07 Tuesday Mar 2017

Posted by willykay in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

ACA, ACA Replacement, AHCA, missouri, Obamacare, Roy Blunt

Yesterday Republicans finally released their plan to dump Obamacare while duping Americans about how badly it’s going to hurt. And how badly will it hurt? Paul Waldman offers a quick summary of the most salient parts of this mess – in short, it will cut benefits for older and poorer people, cost them more, undermine the insurance market, undo Medicaid expansion, cut Planned Parenthood funding and drain Medicare sooner – but, hey, it will also give a big tax cut to the wealthy so it’s all good right?

And then there’s the question of its cost relative to the number of people it will deprive of insurance. A question that we can’t answer because Paul Ryan is intent on getting it out of committee and up for a vote before the Congressoinal Budget Office (CBO) has a chance to score it. It’s that bad.

Paul Krugman explains just how bad the GOP Dump and Dupe plan really is:

For the GOP proposal basically accepts the logic of Obamacare. It retains insurer regulation to prevent exclusion of people with preexisting conditions. It imposes a penalty on those who don’t buy insurance while healthy. And it offers tax credits to help people buy insurance. Conservatives calling the plan Obamacare 2.0 definitely have a point.

But a better designation would be Obamacare 0.5, because it’s really about replacing relatively solid pillars with half-measures, severely and probably fatally weakening the whole structure.

First, the individual mandate – already too weak, so that too many healthy people opt out – is replaced by a penalty imposed if and only if the uninsured decide to enter the market later. This wouldn’t do much.

Second, the ACA subsidies, which are linked both to income and to the cost of insurance, are replaced by flat tax credits which would be worth much less to lower-income Americans, the very people most likely to need help buying insurance.

Taken together, these moves would almost surely lead to a death spiral. …

Nothing here that’s too surprising. The GOP boxed itself into a corner, braying continuously about the horror that was Obamacare – which, in fact, incorporated many ideas devised by conservative thinkers at the Heritage Institute Foundation. Obamacare pumped all the workable ideas out  of the conservative idea well. Which why the repeal part of replace and repeal hasn’t gotten much attention from Republicans apart from bland assurances that all will be well. Of course, now that they have to come up with something, they don’t want to be left with the mess repeal and replace will inevitably create, so they’re twisting and turning and hoping to placate their base with dump and dupe.

Lots of observers think that this particular iteration of dump and dupe will die in the Senate if it even makes it that far – the super rightwing House Freedom Caucus rather emphatically doesn’t buy into the replace/dupe part of the exercise – they want straight out repeal or nothing. That assessment has been cautiously echoed by Missouri’s always cautious Roy Blunt, a junior member of the Senate leadership group:

“Well, I haven’t had time to look at it in great depth yet, so we’ll see,” Blunt said of the plan on KMBZ local radio Tuesday. “What I don’t like is it may not be a plan that gets a majority votes and let’s us move on. Because, we can’t stay where we are with the plan we’ve got now.”

Blunt said any final plan would need to be negotiated.

“I think the nucleus of the plan is clearly there and the President says it’s negotiable and so do House members,” he said. “So, I’ll be interested to be a part of that negotiation as we work toward a majority in the House and Senate that puts a bill on the President’s desk.”

There are two things we can unpack from this statement that tells us a lot about Roy Blunt:

1. Blunt’s priority is, as usual, the political ramifications – he doesn’t really care too much about the bill itself. He just wants to get something done so that he and his fellow corporate shills can get back to doing their real work serving the interests of the folks who write the campaign checks. He knows, though, that Republicans need to check this rather tiresome box off – the GOP’ has demonized Obamacare and promised to repeal it for so long that they have to deliver something or eat some very public crow.

2. Blunt tells us that he believes that “the nucleus of the plan is clearly there” and we can’t stay “where we are with the plan we’ve got now.” But if Obamacare is really so bad, why preserve its structure, the nucleus, I presume, while making it less effective and hurting thousands of his constituents in the process? Could it be that he just doesn’t care what it does or doesn’t do for Missourians?

Roy wants to be part of the process, the “negotiation,” going forward. And that fact should scare us. We know who Blunt is in congress to serve. And it isn’t those folks who finally got insurance under Obamacare. If the new dump and dupe plan is bad, its next iterations will probably be even worse, and we’ll have Roy Blunt and his cronies to thank for it.

Abortion, Hitler, slaves, sanctuaries and rightwingers

07 Tuesday Mar 2017

Posted by willykay in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

abortion policy, Holocaust, missouri, political rhetoric, Revisionist history, slavery

I got a newsletter from State Rep. Stacy Newman (D-87) which noted that when recent anti-abortion measures have been debated in the House, Republicans have come up with some interesting comparisons – abortion as slavery, or, alternatively, the Holocaust.

Ironically, the politicians making these ugly comparisons consider themselves to be conservatives. And conservatives have a really bad record when it comes to racism and anti-semitism.

Conservatives, for example, have defended effort to reanimate the revisionist history of the 1920s that tried to paint slavery as benign. Just today, African-American conservative HUD secretary Ben Carson publicly described slaves as “immigrants” willing to work for “low” wages. Just consider the ongoing controversy over Texas conservatives’ efforts to foist off on the state’s school children  history textbooks that have invented an entirely new lexicon of euphemisms to describe the various practices associated with slavery.

Then there are the Holocaust deniers. While it’s not necessary to deny the Holocaust to be conservative, Holocaust deniers do tend to go to roost on the right – they seem to feel comfortable there for some reason. Just consider some of the more rabid denizens of Trumplandia – whom few in the Missouri conservative world seem willing to denounce. Their chosen champion, Donald Trump, couldn’t even bring himself to name Jews as victims of the Holocaust when he offered the now obligatory presidential Holocaust remembrance statement. That may not be denialism per se, but it’s sure flirting with it.

Interesting how conservatives present slavery and the Holocaust as really bad things when they can use them as labels to try to discredit the entirely legal exercise of choice by women who have every right, legal and moral, to make decisions about how their bodies will be used. But when acknowledging the evils of slavery or the Holocaust focuses unwanted attention on the similarity between conservative policy preferences and the the mindset that led to those horrific events, many on the right try to difuse the impact by pretending that slavery was a bed of roses and the Holocaust wasn’t really about Jews – and maybe it didn’t even happen at all.

*Last sentence edited slightly for clarity.

It’s just another day in the resistance

06 Monday Mar 2017

Posted by Michael Bersin in Resist

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

#resist, missouri, sunrise

Sunrise.

Sunrise.

Sunlight turns back the darkness. Most of the time.

Anti-abortion crusader Thrive teaches abstinence-only sex education in St. Louis

06 Monday Mar 2017

Posted by willykay in Uncategorized

≈ 4 Comments

Great article in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch today about the Christian anti-abortion group, Thrive St. Louis, that has finagled its way into 75 public schools in the St. Louis area where it teaches a values-heavy version of sex education as part of a program titled Best Choice. I won’t go into the gory details – you can read them in the original article, but this snippet gives you an idea about how this group deals with the need to remain impartial when it goes about fulfilling the provisions of the Missouri law that mandate teaching abstinence (the Best Choice, get it?) as a preferred method of birth control:

Another activity to demonstrate the effects of having had sex with more than one person involves chewing cheese crackers and spitting them into a cup of water, which is then poured into another student’s cup. All the while, one student’s cup of water remains pure.

Slut-shaming, right? Which is not, as Leora Tanenbaum suggests, just “a catchy way to signify old-fashioned sexism,” but is a profoundly harmful approach to human sexuality for both boys and girls.

I know that there are lots of folks who might want their children to get this message along with the conservative Christian world-view that it reflects, but lots more don’t. Public school sex education must be factually correct and as neutral in its approach as is possible – even though ideologically driven legislators feel empowered to mandate the teaching of “preferred” sexual behaviors. Religious folks should be teaching their values at home.

Nor is the Thrive approach necessarily a very good way to insure adolescent abstinence. Parents who defend the program might want to take into consideration the fact that heavy-handed efforts to influence their children’s behavior might backfire. There are likely many reasons why abstinence programs don’t do much to dissuade kids from experimenting with sex, but trying to stack the deck in an obvious way definitely doesn’t help.

When I was in the sixth grade there was a law in my state (perhaps a federal law?) that mandated teaching about the evils of communism and the glories of capitalism. The result of the ham-fisted approach that was preferred? A few of my peers in the late sixties and early seventies ended up dedicated Maoists, quoting from the Chairman’s little Red Book. More of us, myself included, endorsed democratic socialism. I would probably never have become interested in the issues of distributive economics had lawmakers not decided that my little brain needed to be bent – hammered, actually – in what they believed to be the right direction. I should probably thank whoever was responsible for those inept educational modules.

Another example is provided by the efforts to combat drug abuse. All the overkill and false facts about how marijuana, for example, was the sure path to hard drugs and a life of squalor were obviously over the top – and all too often delivered by folks who had no qualms about several before-dinner martinis or a few too many beers on the weekend. Consequently, the ubiquitous anti-drug indoctrination programs only served to make even justified warnings about far more problematic drugs suspect to many young people. The final  fillip: it now looks like marijuana will sooner or later become fully legal nationwide.

Get the point? Obvious propaganda rarely works and more often than not renders the purveyors of false or one-sided information suspect. To be effective you have to demonstrate that you deserve trust which means putting all the cards out on the table.

Of course there’s another dimension to the whole issue which is that while Missouri law mandates teaching abstinence as the preferred birth-control method, it doe not mandate that other methods be ignored. Quotes in the Post-Dispatch article imply that while Best Choice goes after the evils of unmarried sex like gangbusters, it does not deal with the full range of important sexual issues – the variety and relative effectiveness of birth control methods, gender identity issues, etc. Children in many St. Louis schools are being given incomplete, often harmful information that disrespects the values of many families. That’s not right.

And guess what? We’re paying with our tax dollars for this indoctrination program. Thrive can offer the Best Choice program to schools “free of charge” because it receives federal funding to do so. We’ve all heard about “faith-based” initiatives. Looks like maybe what we really need is a little more separation of church and state.

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • Can play with AI, can’t be bothered to certify petition signatures
  • We could have had nice things…
  • Campaign Finance: but wait, there’s even more
  • For the company…
  • Iowa, I-80

Recent Comments

Uh, in case you were… on Some right wingnuts with money…
Winning at losing… on Passing the gas – Donald…
TACO Tuesday | Show… on TACO or Mushrooms?
TACO Tuesday | Show… on So much winning
So much winning | Sh… on Passing the gas – Donald…

Archives

  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,051,002 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...