• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Monthly Archives: May 2011

St. Louis Post-Dispatch Blows the Story (again)

08 Sunday May 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 3 Comments

This is an example of the main reason I do not subscribe to the P-D.  Presented with crucial facts that would significantly alter the story they wanted to tell, the Post-Dispatch chooses to ignore them entirely. Knowing that Breitbart serially pushes distorted stories, they chose to repost his side of the story. Knowing that unedited versions of Breitbart’s videos debunk the edited versions, they conveniently forget to look at the full-length versions.

And of course, knowing how badly the Post-Dispatch consistently gets these political stories, which usually rely at best on “he said, she said” narratives, that doesn’t really give me a lot of confidence in the reporting in the other sections of their paper.

The Military Family and the Battle at Home

07 Saturday May 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Every Friday before Mothers’ day there is a day of recognition for the military spouse.  This is only fitting as currently 93% of all military spouses are females.  The military spouses’ overall contribution to the readiness of our warfighters is immeasurable and is a reflection of the merging of cultural norms between an all-volunteer military and the civilian population at large.  The silent ranks provide the warfighter with the warmth and love of home while they endure the sting of reality abroad.  Inadvertently, the military spouse receives little or no appreciation for their contributions.

With quiet fortitude, the military spouse acts as that catalyst between the strongest military on Earth and the diverse civilian population they protect.  The strength and patience required is often overwhelming and heart wrenching.

As Mrs. Obama and Dr. Biden learned, the stories of the military families triumph and success should be a true beacon of hope for a fledging superpower.  Mrs. Obama learned of a 15 year old girl who cared for her family after her father was badly burned.  This young girl had little time to process the emotional trauma of witnessing her father in a helpless state before her brother needed a glass of orange juice and her sister needed her diaper changed.  Today, that 15 year old girl is in college.  

Mrs. Obama learned of a nurse that quit her job to care for her brother that lost both his legs and needed rehabilitation.  She learned of a working military spouse with two children that endured five deployments and eight moves since the towers fell.  She learned of a relapsing cancer survivor that struggled to survive while her husband was in Afghanistan and the military spouse that was nearly deported while her husband was in Iraq.

A majority of the issues military spouses face, as a result of multiple deployments and moves, is stability for their children and employment.  Many employers see multiple jobs or gaps in employment history as red flags, when a sketchy job history is a fact of military life.  Some children also respond poorly to the multiple moves and lack of stability.

However, the real lesson Mrs. Obama learned was that the struggles endured by so many military families made them stronger individuals.  

“These aren’t stories of sadness,” she said. “They’re stories of success, triumph and coming together and unifying. These are the stories the country needs to be motivated by.”

I met my military spouse 42 days before September 11, 2001.  We married in November 2003, 17 days before I was dispatched to the Korean Peninsula for one year and one week.  In our seven and a half years of marriage, we have physically lived together for four years.  We have endured together and in the process we have grown together.  She is my hero and there is no one I admire more than my wife, Kimberly.  I thank her for serving with me, but I don’t thank her enough.

While May 6th was Military Spouse Appreciation Day, we need to remember that all military families struggle during this difficult period in human history.  They are the grandmothers, mothers, sisters, brothers, fathers, and daughters.  They are the CEOs, accountants, police officers and nurses.  They are the community organizers, bake sale participants and the students.  They are the one percent.  I thank all the military families for their service and for taking this journey with us.  God speed.

Push Forward!

Kinder, Hulshof tied in hypothetical primary

06 Friday May 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Fired Up Missouri has a good post on the latest PPP poll of Missouri, including that 38% of Missouri Republicans still aren’t sure that Obama was born in the United States, but buried in the poll results is a curious nugget about Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder.

Kinder has been in line to challenge Gov. Nixon in next year’s election, and it seems pretty obvious that Kinder has been set on running for months, if not years. The Republican field has been cleared for him, but for the heck of it, PPP polled Republican voters on a hypothetical matchup between Kinder, former Gov. Matt Blunt, and the last Republican nominee for governor, former congressman Kenny Hulshof. Kinder at 23% of Republican voters trailed Matt Blunt’s 37%, and only eked ahead of Kenny Hulshof’s 22%. Blunt ended his career as a highly unpopular governor, and Hulshof had one of the poorest showings for a Republican statewide candidate in recent memory, barely outperforming the hapless Mitch Hubbard.

Looks like Republicans aren’t all that enthusiastic about the establishment choice for governor.

…Adding that I somehow missed Michael’s post summarizing the PPP poll as well.  

Osama Bin Laden is Dead, But Will the Patriot Act Live On?

06 Friday May 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

The Patriot Act is (again) up for renewal this month. Now remember, it was initially enacted as a supposedly-temporary measure in the wake of 9-11, but more and more of it keeps getting made permanent and the rest has been continually extended for the past decade. With the death of Bin Laden, it’s finally time for Congress to bring back the pre-9-11 legal norm, before we decided it was OK to toss out our civil liberties if the “bad guys” were scary enough.

A key debate is brewing as the vote grows near: The right-wing will argue that Bin Laden’s demise is evidence that the PATRIOT Act was justified, despite there being no evidence that it helped in any way in the search for bin Laden (other than constantly distracting law enforcement with thousands of spurious leads). We believe it’s now time to fix the Patriot Act once and for all. We must erase bin Laden’s ugly legacy, not extend it: By ending the PATRIOT Act’s erosion of our civil liberties, we can protect the freedoms that make America worth fighting for.

Will you click here to sign our petition urging Congress to fix the Patriot Act?

Progressives and Tea Party Republicans initially blocked a long-term Patriot Act extension in January, but a three month-extension was passed in February.  During the interim, the House and Senate have held hearings on potential reforms to the expiring provisions. The authorities in question are:

  1. Section 215 powers which let the government secretly grab information about you without a court order
  2. Roving wiretaps which let the government spy on people without even telling courts who they’re spying on
  3. The “lone wolf” provision which lets strip the rights of American citizens and treat them under the lower legal standards reserved for enemy governments

These provisions were always unjustified, always an over-reach of the government’s authorities, initially enacted only because a terrorized citizenry was too fearful to prioritize defense of its constitutional rights.  With Bin Laden’s passing it should be clear to all Americans: The era of the Patriot Act, of spying on Americans who aren’t suspected of crimes, of heavy-handed abuse of our dearly held civil liberties, must come to an end.

Click here: sign our petition urging Congress to fix the Patriot Act.

Nearly 75,000 Demand Progress members have urged Congress to fix the Patriot Act.  In April 3,000 of them called the White House to urge President Obama to veto any bill that lacks sufficient reforms. Demand Progress aired an anti-Patriot Act ad on MSNBC, CNN, and FOX News earlier this year. Now it’s your turn to help. Sign now.

And this year our keynote speaker is…

06 Friday May 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Okay, every Democratic committee in the country has a “Truman Days.” What we in Jackson County, MO have over all the others is ours is the real one, the party thrown every year by the county committee that Harry himself belonged to his entire life.

It is always a great weekend, and the cherry on top is always the keynote address by someone our Representative, Rev. Emanuel Cleaver has sweet-talked into coming to Kansas City for the weekend.

That process usually involves promises of barbecue at Gates in Midtown (I live within sniffin’ distance, and my motto is “if there must be pollution, let it be barbecue”) but that is certainly not the case this year…this year the people and the legacy of Harry Truman are the attractions, because the speaker is a vegan.

It is my pleasure to inform you that Dennis Kucinich will deliver the keynote address at this year’s annual Truman Days celebration, which will be held at the Holiday Inn Coco Key Water Resort in Kansas City (it’s the old Adams Mark, by the stadiums, to the locals.)

The festivities get underway on Friday evening when the hospitality suites open and they end Saturday night when they close up after the keynote.

See you there!  

Public Policy Polling – Gov. Jay Nixon (D) versus Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder (r)

06 Friday May 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

2012, governor, Jay Nixon, missouri, Peter Kinder, Public Policy Polling

On May 4th Public Policy Polling released the results of a survey of 555 Missouri voters taken from April 28th to May 1st with a margin of error of 3.9%. “PPP surveys are conducted through automated telephone interviews.”

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

Nixon still ahead

Jay Nixon continues to look like a solid favorite for reelection as Governor of Missouri, and his lead over his most likely opponent has expanded over the course of the last two months.

Nixon has good approval numbers, with 48% of voters giving him positive reviews to 29% who say they disapprove of his work. Nixon’s numbers continue to be a little bit unusual in that he’s weaker than you might expect with Democrats, with only a 61% rating where you would more often see a Governor in the 70-80% range with their own party’s voters. But he makes up for that by having an unusual level of appeal to Republicans, nearly breaking even with them at 36% who approve to 38% who disapprove. He’s also in good standing with independents at 46/29.

Nixon leads his most likely opponent for next year, Peter Kinder, 48-34 in a hypothetical contest. That’s up from 45-38 on PPP’s last poll of the race. Even though the Democratic base is not in love with Nixon they’ll still vote for him over Kinder by an 85-5 margin. Nixon also picks up 13% of the Republican vote and leads Kinder by a 46-27 spread with independents….

[emphasis added]

It makes it easier to ignore your party base when the opposition party’s leading candidate is a right wingnut with the political instincts and ability of a paving brick.

Crosstabs are here.

Voter Protection Alliance

06 Friday May 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Citizens in Charge, Missouri General Assembly, Prop B, Rep. Scott Sifton

I don’t know if anyone has posted the link to the Voter Protection Alliance page yet. Look at the list of endorsers.  This should be an “interesting” project.  I worked with libertarians and property rights people a year ago in Franklin County to thwart a charter rule effort that would have handed all decision making over to developers.  I found the folks on the opposite end of the political spectrum from me very cooperative, hard working and loyal to the cause.  As long as we didn’t talk about anything other than charter rule !

Rep. Scott Sifton of Affton (St. Louis County) deserves huge credit for leading the effort to push back against the overreaching Missouri legislators who think the Capitol is their private club.

We will be gathering signatures this year and voting next year on a constitutional amendment to require 3/4 vote of both houses to override a law passed by citizen initiative petition.  It’s about time.  

Thirty coins

05 Thursday May 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 5 Comments

Tags

Jamilah Nasheed, missouri, Penny Hubbard, Redistricting

Not every turncoat Democrat in the Missouri House has an office on the third floor of the Capitol with the Republican leadership, but if a Democrat does have an office there, she might as well tattoo “traitor” on her forearm. Admittedly, you already knew what to think of Jamilah Nasheed and Penny Hubbard for their vote Wednesday to hand the redistricting goodies to Republicans. Traitors both. Thanks to them, Democrats are consigned to having only two of eight Congressional seats–hardly representative of the way Missourians vote.

Nasheed and Hubbard share office 317. They belong in the august company of Rodney Hubbard and Ted Hoskins, who were also on the third floor–and deserved to be.

120210TilleywithNasheed

Republican speaker of the House Steve Tilley, flanked by Nasheed

What doth it profit a woman if she gains the whole world and loses her own soul? But for a third floor office, ladies? Well, they might be getting a lot more for their treachery than the office space, but I wouldn’t know about under the table deals.

Nasheed is claiming that she did it to protect Clay’s seat.

Nasheed, who said some House Democrats threatened to kick her out of their caucus for her vote, said she was not concerned with what the Democratic Party wanted the map to look like, explaining, “I’m black before I’m a Democrat.”

“My concern is the 1st Congressional District and what is good for the 1st Congressional District,” she added.

Right. Like having only two Democrats instead of three in the Missouri delegation to the House is likely to help the people in the 1st Congressional District? She just handed Paul Ryan another vote in his war on poor people, and there are plenty of poor, BLACK people in the 1st.

Don’t try to sell us that bullshit, Nasheed. Just take your thirty coins of silver and shut up.

(Photo courtesy of MoNewsHorizon)

Now what, Claire?: spending caps – the republican plan with lipstick

05 Thursday May 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Claire McCaskill, Medicare, missouri, Robert Reich, spending caps

Previously:

Now what, Claire? (October 2, 2009)

Now what, Claire? – part 2 (October 27, 2009

Robert Reich has a thing or two to say about the inadvisability of the McCaskill/Corker spending cap:

[Spending Caps: Putting Lipstick On A Pig]

Hi, I’m Robert Reich. Republicans figure that if they can’t sell the pig they’ll just put lipstick on it and find some suckers who will think it’s something else. That’s the proposal emerging in the Senate from Republican Bob Corker of Tennessee and also Democrat Claire McCaskill of Missouri. It would get the deficit down, not by raising taxes on the rich, but by capping federal spending. That cap would steadily drop over time as it squeezed spending more and more.And if Congress failed to stay under the cap the budget would be automatically cut.

According to an analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities the McCaskill/Corker plan would require eight hundred billion dollars of cuts in twenty-twenty-two alone. That’s the equivalent of eliminating Medicare entirely, or the entire Department of Defense. Now, obviously, the Defense Department wouldn’t disappear, so what would go?

We’d have to have giant cuts in Medicare, Medicaid, education, and much of everything else American’s depend on.

It’s the republican plan with lipstick. It would have exactly the same result as the current Republican plan. But, by disguising it with caps and procedures Republicans can avoid saying what they’re intending to do, destroy Medicare and Medicaid, slash programs for poor and moderate income Americans, and not demand a penny from wealthy Americans.

The McCaskill/Corker spending cap would also make it impossible for government to boost the economy in recessions, which would lead to even higher unemployment, lasting longer.

Other Senate Democrats are showing interest in this lipsticked pig, including West Virginia’s Joe Machin. And not surprisingly, Joe Lieberman is on board.

But don’t be fooled and don’t let anyone else be. McCaskill/Corker is the same republican pig.

[Tell Congress: No Spending Caps That Slash Medicare]

Announcer: Moveon dot org is responsible for the content of this advertisement.

“…That’s the equivalent of eliminating Medicare entirely…” For republicans that’s a feature, not a bug. We just didn’t expect the same from Democrats we elected to help hold back the barbarian tide.

“…The McCaskill/Corker spending cap would also make it impossible for government to boost the economy in recessions, which would lead to even higher unemployment, lasting longer…” Yeah, we got that one covered, don’t we Claire? Just ask Paul Krugman.

You’d think that it would eventually sink in that Lucy always pulls the football away. Always.

Yeah, Claire, I bet you thought it was a great idea when your name first got top billing on the plan, eh?

What, another "Contract on America"?

05 Thursday May 2011

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Billy Long, Frank Luntz, missouri

Same tune, same fiddler, same fake book.

Representative Billy Long (r) via Twitter:

@BillyLongMO7 Billy Long

The always insightful Frank Luntz ‘The Word Doctor’ was double sharp today at our breakfast meeting. Watch him tonight at the GOP debate. 56 minutes ago

Spare us all:

AAPOR Finds Frank Luntz in Violation of Ethics Code

Wednesday, April 23, 1997 — The Executive Council of the American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) announced Wednesday that a 14 month investigation found pollster Frank Luntz violated the Association’s Code of Professional Ethics and Practices.

AAPOR found Luntz, who heads the Luntz Research Companies in Arlington,Virginia, repeatedly refused to make public essential facts about his research on public attitudes about the Republicans’ “Contract with America.” In particular, the AAPOR inquiry focused on Luntz’s reporting, prior to the November elections in 1994, that his research showed at least 60 percent of the public favored each of the elements in the GOP “Contract.” When later asked to provide some basic facts about this research, Luntz refused.

AAPOR holds that researchers must disclose, or make available for public disclosure, the wording of questions and other basic methodological details when poll findings are made public. This disclosure is important so that claims made on the basis of opinion research findings can be independently evaluated. Section III of the AAPOR Code states: “Good professional practice imposes the obligation upon all public opinion researchers to include, in any report of research results, or to make available when that report is released, certain essential information about how the research was conducted.”

Richard A. Kulka, chair of AAPOR’s Standards Committee noted that AAPOR’s investigation of Luntz began in January 1996, after receiving a complaint from a member. According to Kulka, “AAPOR tried on several occasions to get Luntz to provide some basic information about his survey, for example, the wording of the questions he used. For about a year, he ignored these requests. Subsequently, he provided partial information, but still refused o let us make any of the information public, arguing that the results were [p]roprietary, even though he had been discussing the conclusions of the survey n public for nearly two years.”

AAPOR’s President, Diane Colasanto, adds “When researchers make [p]ublic arguments based on their research data, then refuse to say how their [r]esearch was conducted, that harms the public debate on issues and reduces he credibility of all survey and public opinion research.”

AAPOR is an organization of over 1,400 research professionals from government agencies, colleges and universities, non-profit organizations, and commercial polling firms. It is the primary professional association representing public opinion researchers, and has a strong interest in protecting and strengthening the credibility of survey research. The organization was founded in 1947 by such pioneers of polling as George Gallup, Hadley Cantril, and Paul Lazarsfeld.

Luntz is not a member of the organization.

Isn’t it interesting that a grifter like Newt Gingrich (r) is back in the picture these days?

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • Eric Schmitt (r): “something, something, close the barn door…”
  • Perfect timing
  • Mark Alford (r): that right wingnut echo chamber just got a lot smaller
  • Medicare for All
  • Campaign Finance: wasted money

Recent Comments

Eric Schmitt (r):… on On becoming a meme for epic st…
Campaign Finance: wa… on Missouri republicans: an etern…
Campaign Finance: wa… on Campaign Finance: no quarter
Campaign Finance: wa… on Campaign Finance: Next
Mike’s Blog Round-Up… on Mark Alford (r): you can smell…

Archives

  • November 2026
  • October 2026
  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,103,998 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...