• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Tag Archives: U.S. Supreme Court

A sinking land yacht

21 Friday Sep 2018

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Brett Kavanaugh, Donald Trump, missouri, rape culture, U.S. Supreme Court

Concerned Women for America “Women for Kavanaugh” tour bus outside the Missouri State Fair Governor’s Ham Breakfast – August 2018.

Poll: More Americans oppose Kavanaugh confirmation than support it
Brett Kavanaugh is first Supreme Court nominee below water in the history of the NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll.

…In the poll — which was conducted Sunday (when the accusation from Christine Blasey Ford was first made public) through Wednesday — 38 percent of voters say they oppose Kavanaugh’s nomination to serve on the nation’s highest court, including 27 percent who “strongly” oppose him.

That’s compared with 34 percent who support his nomination, including 25 percent who “strongly” support him. Twenty-eight percent say they don’t enough to have an opinion.

[….]

All other Supreme Court nominees the NBC/WSJ poll has tested have enjoyed positive-negative scores that have been above water…

Previously:

It’s time (September 8, 2018)

Claire McCaskill (D) has got to be the luckiest politician on the planet (September 17, 2018)

And….Boom! (September 19, 2018)

Clueless (September 21, 2018)

Clueless

21 Friday Sep 2018

Posted by Michael Bersin in Resist

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

#resist, Brett Kavanaugh, Donald Trump, rape culture, social media, Twitter, U.S. Supreme Court

This morning:

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump
I have no doubt that, if the attack on Dr. Ford was as bad as she says, charges would have been immediately filed with local Law Enforcement Authorities by either her or her loving parents. I ask that she bring those filings forward so that we can learn date, time, and place!
8:14 AM – 21 Sep 2018

There are a significant number of people in this country who think this is just fine.

And….Boom!

19 Wednesday Sep 2018

Posted by Michael Bersin in Claire McCaskill, US Senate

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

Brett Kavanaugh, Claire McCaskill, missouri, U.S. Senate, U.S. Supreme Court

“Perfect.”

Senator Claire McCaskill (D) [2017 file photo].

This evening, from Senator Claire McCaskill (D):

Claire McCaskill @clairecmc
I will vote no on Judge Kavanaugh.

I have been thorough in examining Judge Kavanaugh’s record. And while the recent allegations against him are troubling and deserve a thorough and fair examination by the Senate Judiciary Committee, my decision is not based on those allegations but rather on his positions on several key issues, most importantly the avalanche of dark, anonymous money that is crushing our democracy.

He has revealed his bias against limits on campaign donations which places him completely out of the mainstream of this nation. He wrote, ‘And I have heard very few people say that limits on contributions to candidates are unconstitutional although I for one tend to think those limits have some constitutional problems.

Going even further, Judge Kavanaugh will give free reign to anonymous donors and foreign governments through their citizens to spend money to interfere and influence our elections with so-called ‘issue ads.’ These ‘issue ads’ are now flooding the airways in this nation to directly influence election outcomes, drowning the concept of individuals having the strongest voice in our democracy. Judge Kavanaugh has clearly said that there should be literally no restrictions on these ads. He has called restrictions on these dark money issue ads ‘blatantly unconstitutional.’ And in a court opinion, he went out of his way to say that foreign nationals weren’t restricted from creating or contributing to these ads – even when that wasn’t the issue before the court. A Russian company that has been indicted for election interference is currently using Judge Kavanaugh’s opinion to argue for their innocence.

While I am also uncomfortable about his view on Presidential power as it relates to the rule of law, and his position that corporations are people, it is his allegiance to the position that unlimited donation and dark anonymous money, even from foreign interests, should be allowed to swamp the voices of individuals that has been the determining factor in my decision to vote no on his nomination.
[….]

5:58 PM – 19 Sep

“…And while the recent allegations against him are troubling and deserve a thorough and fair examination by the Senate Judiciary Committee, my decision is not based on those allegations…”

Right. Claire McCaskill (D) was Jackson County Prosecutor from 1993-1998 – and was an assistant prosecutor in the office before that. A prosecutor. Contemplate that for just a moment.

That’s our Claire.

The calls to campaign offices by potential campaign volunteers just spiked.

Previously:

It’s time (September 8, 2018)

Claire McCaskill (D) has got to be the luckiest politician on the planet (September 17, 2018)

Claire McCaskill (D) has got to be the luckiest politician on the planet

17 Monday Sep 2018

Posted by Michael Bersin in Claire McCaskill, social media, US Senate

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

Brett Kavanaugh, Claire McCaskill, Josh Hawley, missouri, social media, Twitter, U.S. Senate, U.S. Supreme Court

Her political opponents always seem to suffer from such bad timing.

Josh Hawley [2016 file photo].

On Friday:

Josh Hawley @HawleyMO
US Senate candidate, MO
Our first media debate is today – @clairecmc still hasn’t hopped on my debate trailer, but like I’ve said, I’ll debate her anytime, anywhere. Follow @TeamHawley and @MissouriGOP for updates during the event! #MOSen
2:30 PM – 14 Sep 2018

Oh, so now it’s a trailer? Got schooled, eh?

And then, today, via Jason Rosenbaum:

Jason Rosenbaum @jrosenbaum
Here’s @HawleyMO on Kavanaugh:

Response from Attorney General Josh Hawley:

“I’m concerned that Senator Feinstein and the Democrats waited until the last hour to bring this 30-year old allegation to light.

“The Democrats have played politics with this entire process and were opposed to Brett Kavanaugh before he was even nominated. They don’t care about the truth.

“I believe allegations of sexual misconduct should never be disregarded. That’s why it’s important that both Dr. Ford and Judge Kavanaugh be heard immediately and under oath.”

3:48 PM – 17 Sep 2018

Just perfect.

Oh, by the way, Merrick Garland.

It’s time

08 Saturday Sep 2018

Posted by Michael Bersin in Claire McCaskill, social media, US Senate

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

Brett Kavanaugh, Claire McCaskill, Donald Trump, missouri, social media, Twitter, U.S. Senate, U.S. Supreme Court

Senator Claire McCaskill (D) [2017 file photo].

Today, via Twitter:

Carolyn McMahon @cmc21
I asked why we haven’t heard an answer on #Kavanaugh yet. @clairecmc asks Missourians to trust her process, and says when she gives her opinion it will have an explanation to how she arrived at it.
[….]
12:11 PM – 8 Sep 2018

Um, let’s see.

He was nominated by a self-serving moron. For a reason.

The hearings were rushed through at the direction of the majority party.

He’s a partisan hack.

He lied to the Senate. More than once.

We don’t have access to his complete public service record. Neither do you.

Putting this partisan hack on the U.S. Supreme Court will affect the country for at least the next three decades.

He has no intent to ever understand basic reproductive biology.

As much as he tried to mask a predilection for bad manners and a lack of empathy, he has shown us who he really is.

Mike Pence (r): your awl stoopit

28 Tuesday Aug 2018

Posted by Michael Bersin in Resist, social media, US Senate

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Brett Kavanaugh, gaslighting, Merrick Garland, Mike Pence, social media, Twitter, U.S. Senate, U.S. Supreme Court

….the classic ‘legal’ definition of chutzpah….a person who kills his parents and pleads for the court’s mercy on the ground of being an orphan….

This afternoon, via Twitter, from Mike Pence (r):

Vice President Mike Pence @VP
…Justice Antonin Scalia was confirmed 98-0 and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg received support of 96 Senators. If we lived in a more respectful time, Judge Brett Kavanaugh would be overwhelmingly confirmed by the United States Senate. #ConfirmKavanaugh
3:03 PM – 28 Aug 2018

Some of the responses:

If we lived in a better time, you’d be an anonymous potato farmer.

Actually he would be still be a DJ on a low-powered radio station somewhere in an Indiana cornfield.

If we lived in a more respectful time, all records would be released #WhatAreTheyHiding

#UnindictedCoConspirator doesn’t get to pick his own judge.

Remind us again how many votes Merrick Garland got.

If we lived in a more respectful time, you would not be Vice President.

If we lived in a more respectful time, Judge Merrick Garland would have been overwhelmingly confirmed by the United States Senate instead of being back burnered for months and months by your party. What a hypocrite!

Manafort’s top draft pick.

Сделать Америку великой Снова.

Well blame your boss for not living in respectful times.

Traitor says what?

If the documents had all been released already we’d have no problem beginning hearings. This nominee lied in confirmation hearings held on his appointment to the circuit court. We will not seat a man of no integrity.

Trump once said, “Most people aren’t worthy of respect.” His behavior toward others continues to demonstrate this belief. The lack of respect is coming from the top. If you wanted to live in more respectful times, you shouldn’t have helped him into the WH. #MerrickGarland

If we lived in a more respectful time, your boss would not Tweet hate towards everyone except those who bow at his feet. #YourBossIsUnindictedCriminal #NoKavanaughUntilMuellerIsDone

This is disgusting. If we lived in a more respectful time, the GOP would have given Merrick Garland A HEARING. And in a more respectful time, Trump would not be sitting in the Oval Office, and you, as transition head, would not have ignored bipartisan concerns over traitor Flynn.

what about MERRICK GARLAND? where was the respect owed him? where was his vote?

garland’s not on the record perjuring himself. garland wasn’t working in concert to hide 85% of his records from congress. garland didn’t say that a POTUS couldn’t be indicted.

Um…and Elena Kagan had to show ALL her papers from when she was an advisor the White House. THAT is the holdup over Kavanaugh. Republicans are damming up the flow of those documents that will be incriminating against Kavanaugh. Respect has nothing to do with it; documents do.

What was the final vote for Merrick Garland?

Was the president who nominated them under investigation for committing treason and working with Russia to make himself president?

If we lived in a more respectful time, you wouldn’t be in office. #complicit

Judge Merrick Garland deserved the support of every member of the United States Senate. If we lived in a more respectful time, Garland would have been easily confirmed. Your hypocrisy knows no bounds. #ReleaseTheRecords

NOPE Sorry Kremlin Ken. We don’t want a Putin appointed president to decide who sits on our highest court.

How DARE you complain about times not being “respectful”. The man you are enabling and hiding behind is the least respectful and most abusive person in our government, and is the top reason why our country is so divided and disrespectful. Get HIM to change, or stop your whining

Merrick Garland. Merrick Garland. Merrick Garland. Merrick Garland. Merrick Garland. Merrick Garland. Merrick Garland. Merrick Garland. Merrick Garland. Merrick Garland. Merrick Garland. Merrick Garland. Merrick Garland. Merrick Garland. Merrick Garland.

What was the vote on Merrick Garland, @VP?

“If we lived in a more respectful time…” With all due respect Mr. Vice President, get bent.

Only if we lived in less corrupt days.

have you had your irony surgically removed, or are you just that incapable of understanding it?

You have got to be kidding me. Tell me this is a joke.

Two words: Merrick Garland. Three more: so shut up.

Merrick. Garland.

A president under investigation should not pick his judge. #NoHearings

If we lived in a more respectful times, Merrick Garland would be a Supreme Court Justice, actual Nazis wouldn’t be running for public office, and Donald Trump wouldn’t be either a celebrity or a president.

Yep. Justice Merrick Garland fully agrees.

The ABSURD posturing around blocking Merrick Garland’s nomination and refusing to even let a vote happen has left your party with ZERO moral high ground to complain about lack of cooperation with Supreme Court nominations, you jackass

Not forgetting the confirmation vote for Merrick Garland, you pompous, purpose-less poser.

The hypocrisy runs deep in this one.

Merrick Effing Garland you putz

Merrick. Garland.
You set the standard.
Now live with it.

The difference is Scalia and RGB we’re appointed by a democratically elected administration. #NoNewAppointments

You’re a stooge, a crook and a flunky, Pence. Everybody knows it, even those who pretend otherwise to your face.

It goes on and on.

Mike Pence (r) is a putz. And probably the only reason why Donald Trump (r) won’t be impeached, convicted, and removed from office.

Senator Claire McCaskill (D) in Lee’s Summit – Press Q and A – August 25, 2018

25 Saturday Aug 2018

Posted by Michael Bersin in Claire McCaskill, US Senate

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

agriculture, Brett Kavanaugh, Claire McCaskill, family separation, immigration, Lee's Summit, missouri, Tariffs, U.S. Senate, U.S. Supreme Court

In The New Yorker:

Will Anyone in the Trump Administration Ever Be Held Accountable for the Zero-Tolerance Policy?
By Jonathan Blitzer August 22, 2018

….I asked the current Administration official whether the outcry over family separation had caught the government by surprise. It had, the official said. “The expectation was that the kids would go to the Office of Refugee Resettlement, that the parents would get deported, and that no one would care.” Yet, when it became clear that the public did, the Administration chose not to change course.

Early this afternoon Senator Claire McCaskill (D) stopped by a coordinated campaign headquarters in Lee’s Summit in Eastern Jackson County to speak to and greet campaign volunteers, many who were later going out for door to door campaigning or phone banking on behalf of Democratic Party candidates. Close to a hundred volunteers were in attendance.

And, of course, outside in the parking lot were the usual opposition trackers and costumed actors. Don’t ask.

Senator Claire McCaskill (D) – Lee’s Summit, Missouri – August 25, 2018.

Senator McCaskill spent about twenty minutes covering a wide range of issues important to working families in Missouri and giving a campaign update to the volunteers.

After speaking to the campaign volunteers Senator McCaskill took a few minutes to answer questions from the media:

Question: …Could you talk a little bit about the drought and your concerns about Missouri right now, [cross talk] [inaudible] can do about it?

Senator Claire McCaskill (D): Well [crosstalk], the, the, our agricultural community is getting a double whammy right now, um, a drought and tariffs. Uh, it is a crisis, um, that, frankly, I don’t, I’m not sure that the president really understands that many of these markets we’re losing, particularly soybeans in China are not going to be easily recoverable. I mean, this is something we’ve spent millions of dollars, working towards establishing a market for soybeans in China, and now they’re sourcing their beans somewhere else. Well, they’re not going to come back to American soybeans like that. Uh, it will be, um, a hangover that will dramatically affect our state for some time to come. Even if it gets fixed. And it doesn’t appear to me that it’s getting fixed anytime soon.

And, the drought, obviously, we’re going to be doing a lot of work that, to get, there are programs in place to help when we have drought or flood, and obviously, we’ll be monitoring those programs and making sure that those monies are getting out to the farmers, the crop insurance, the other things that they’re entitled to, on a timely basis.

Question: So, a lot of your Democratic colleague are calling for, uh, the delay of Brett Kavanaugh’s hearing. Where do you stand on that?

Senator McCaskill: I’m not sure that, uh, first of all, it, it’s not going to be delayed. Um, I’m trying to avoid all the political posturing on this nomination and keep my head down and figure it out based on his record, based on his opinions, on issues that I think are really important.

Dark money being at the top of the list. Um, I have begun to look at some of his opinions about dark money and I’m concerned. he wrote one opinion that said he wasn’t sure that we could constitutionally limit the ability of foreign countries to come in do issue advocacy. Well, if you notice those ads that are hiding as issue advocacy and they say call someone, that’s issue advocacy and I think most people would say those are political commercials.

So, I’m very worried about, um, what has happened with dark money and that’s going to be one of the focuses of my decision is, is his opinions and what he says in the hearings about dark money.

Question: And you met with him earlier this week [crosstalk][inaudible].

Senator McCaskill: Uh huh, I did.

Question: Is there anything else that stood out to you from talking with him?

Senator McCaskill: Well, we, we spent a lot of time on that. I’m not going to go into the details of the conversation, but we spent a lot of time on dark money.

Question: Senator, you said after the primary that your Supreme Court vote is not a political winner, that there are going to be people in the state that are mad at you either way. How, are you concerned that this could really effect your reelection, that this could be a, a big issue in the race, and depending on how you vote?

Senator McCaskill: Well, I, as I said, and I do believe this, that there’s not a side to take that would be a political winner. Which I think in, it’s one of the nice things about representing a state like mine, you’re never going to make everybody happy with a vote. So what you try to do is the right thing. And be able to explain it. And so I’m going to make up my mind based on the concerns I have about constitutional decisions that have been made over the last decade and that could change with him on the court. And I will, uh, explain my vote to Missourians based on those issues and hope they understand.

Show Me Progress: Senator, based on reports, the administration, when they were dealing with immigrant families, they, the, the reports stated that they, they didn’t really make plans because they didn’t think anybody would care.

Senator McCaskill: You mean about separating [crosstalk] the children?

Show Me Progress: Separating the children.

Senator McCaskill: I don’t know that I’ve seen that report, but obviously that’s, um, that would be troubling. Because I think anybody would realize that pulling babies out of their parents’ arms is never a winner under any circumstances. And, I mean, I think we’ve got to secure peoples’ appearance at court, but there are plenty of ways to do, secure peoples’ appearance at court without separating children from their families.

After taking questions from the media Senator McCaskill remained at the headquarters and continued to speak with and greet individual volunteers. Selfies are definitely a campaign ritual these days.

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): Take my advice, Claire, and then I won’t vote for you…

22 Wednesday Aug 2018

Posted by Michael Bersin in Claire McCaskill, social media, US Senate

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

4th Congressional District, Brett Kavanaugh, Claire McCaskill, Donald Trump, missouri, social media, Twitter, U.S. Senate, U.S. Supreme Court, Vicky Hartzler

Representative Vicky Hartzler (r) [2018 file photo].

From Representative Vicky Hartzler(r) via Twitter:

Rep. Vicky Hartzler @RepHartzler
During his more than 10 years serving on the D.C. Circuit Court, Brett Kavanaugh has shown his ability to respect, uphold, and interpret the Constitution fairly. I hope Senator McCaskill will decide to support his nomination after their meeting tomorrow.
2:24 PM – 20 Aug 2018 from Washington, DC

Wait, is the House in session?

Some of the Twitter responses:

77 days until we vote you out of office
#FireVicky #MO04

That they should release all the documents if he is so wonderful. #FireVicky #LiesMatter

I hope @clairecmc remembers the support the @GOP did not give Merrick Garland and that they are hiding something in Kavanaugh’s records. I hope she votes no and will call her office today to remind her!

@RepHartzler states the the Kavanaugh is ok, so I’m sure nothing in his years covered by unreviewed documents could be all that bad. Or it is…. maybe we should get to read it actually…

If he has nothing to hide they should release all his papers. Transparency is essential to democracy.

Why? Is carrying all that water getting heavy?

Uh huh. So is lying in a hearing for confirmation to be a judge protected in the Constitution?

You/GOP: We’re fine w/treason, corruption, obstruction of justice, kids in cages, attacks on allies, our Constitution & institutions, sleazy payoffs, RU attacks, criminality, thousands of lies, racism, mentally unfit 45 as long as we get judges! And we refuse to show all his docs

Wait, didn’t he get caught lying under oath?

Now that Trump has been implicated in crime to influence the 2016 election by paying off women to cover up his illicit affairs, no Supreme Court Justice should be allowed to go forward. #CrookedTrump #Lockhimup

He lied under oath. Why are you okay with that?

Not if she want my vote in November! He’s literally promised to protect Trump from any indictment! Surely you cannot expect any positive reaction to this ridiculous statement! If you can further the cause of justice, get out of the way!

I hope Senator McCaskill gives him the same amount of time, consideration, and support that you give to your constituents, Congresswoman. #FireVicky

Ouch.

Oh did they release his records?

You know who had a great, moderate record? Merrick Garland.

Do you support review of his past decisions which are being withheld by the GOP? What are you hiding? Tell us why you want to help hide his history?

#Puppet

Now that the president has been implicated in a federal crime, Kavanaugh’s hearings should be delayed. You should be stepping up and demanding investigations into what has happened. Your constituents and country over party Vicky.

I think if over a year left was enough for Republicans to stall a SC nominee, then being implicated in crimes and easily meeting the standards for impeachment is definitely worth blocking anyone trump nominates.
What makes you want to destroy your country like this, vicky?

#ReleaseTheRecords and let WE THE PEOPLE decide. #WhatAreTheyHiding?

This is not the time to think of yourself and reelection. This decision will affect the people long after you are gone. Put the people first.

You must be out of your damn mind. Release the records.

They’re not buying it.

Senator Claire McCaskill (D) [2018 file photo].

For right wingnuts “The Handmaid’s Tale” is not dystopian fiction, it’s aspirational

16 Thursday Aug 2018

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Brett Kavanaugh, Concerned Women for America, Governor's Ham Breakfast, missouri, republicans, right wingnuts, Sedalia, State Fair, tour bus, U.S. Supreme Court

This morning outside the Governor’s Ham Breakfast at the Missouri State Fair in Sedalia:

Concerned Women for America Brett Kavanaugh (r) U.S. Supreme Court tour bus.

We understand red is the color.

52% of Americans want U.S. Supreme Court nominee to be confirmed by the U.S. Senate

04 Wednesday Jul 2018

Posted by Michael Bersin in Claire McCaskill, Roy Blunt, US Senate

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

confirmation, Merrick Garland, U.S. Senate, U.S. Supreme Court

Oh, wait, that was for Merrick Garland, President Obama’s nominee for the vacancy on the court. The republicans obstructed his nomination for 293 days, never giving his nomination a hearing or a vote.

Senator Roy Blunt (r) didn’t seem to suffer any consequences for obstructing the will of the people, did he?

Are you listening, Claire?

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • Donald Trump’s (r) Russian Diesel
  • Campaign Finance: “…It’s the only way to be sure.”
  • Campaign Finance: all that right wingnut money, just to vilify a tiny minority
  • Campaign Finance: shifting into high gear
  • Bribery

Recent Comments

Campaign Finance:… on Campaign Finance: Next
Campaign Finance: al… on Campaign Finance: Next
Campaign Finance: sh… on Campaign Finance: off to the r…
Campaign Finance: th… on Campaign Finance: off to the r…
Campaign Finance: ke… on Campaign Finance: Next

Archives

  • October 2026
  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,092,221 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...