Roll Call Vote 119th Congress – 1st Session
Vote Summary
Question: On the Nomination (Confirmation: Peter Hegseth, of Tennessee, to be Secretary of Defense)
Vote Number: 15 Vote Date: January 24, 2025, 08:57 PM
Required For Majority: 1/2Vote Result: Nomination Confirmed
Nomination Number: PN11-7
Nomination Description: Peter Hegseth, of Tennessee, to be Secretary of Defense
Vote Counts:
YEAs 50
NAYs 50
Vice President of the United States Voted Yea
What’d you like about him? His Nazi tattoos? His sexual assaults? Drunkenness?
You just confirmed an alcoholic, rapist, who has never commanded anything larger than a platoon to secretary of defense. This is criminal neglegence.
Unqualified. Cheat. Thief. Yet you confirmed him like Trump’s good little boy.
you should be disgusted with yourself for supporting someone as hilariously unqualified as hegseth. truly running this country to the ground
Sir. I am a Missourian and a lifelong Republican. I am also a sexual assault survivor I will not forget your vote on Hegeseth. Shame on you. Nothing I can do about that now, except to not vote for you ever again, and hopefully God will judge you accordingly.
You are now responsible for putting an abusive alcoholic in one of the highest positions of power.
What a joke!
Well with the GOP bar being so low he can stumble and crawl to it.
Eric Schmitt did a useless job confirming the least qualified SecDef in history.
Xi is celebrating [….]
Eric Schmitt YOU HAVE REACHED A NEW LOW- even other Republicans had the bravery to vote against confirmation.
Just f’ing incredible- to confirm an alcoholic, domestic abuser and is the least qualified militarily to be in charge of Defense. All because Trump liked him on Fox.
What a whore for your leader. What an unqualified person. Something you are familiar with.
A drunk rapist. You’re disgusting.
You’re a fuck up. You’re incapable of thinking for yourself and are just a pussy puppet doing what you’re scared into doing. You don’t represent the people of Missouri or this country. You just made us weak. You would’ve done better voting for Frank Burns or Gomer Pyle.
Oh, wait, that was for Merrick Garland, President Obama’s nominee for the vacancy on the court. The republicans obstructed his nomination for 293 days, never giving his nomination a hearing or a vote.
Senator Roy Blunt (r) didn’t seem to suffer any consequences for obstructing the will of the people, did he?
U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 115th Congress – 1st Session
[….]
Question: On the Nomination (Confirmation: Rex W. Tillerson, of Texas, to be Secretary of State )
Vote Number: 36
Vote Date: February 1, 2017, 02:31 PM
Required For Majority: 1/2
Vote Result: Nomination Confirmed
Nomination Number: PN25
Nomination Description: Rex W. Tillerson, of Texas, to be Secretary of State
Vote Counts:
YEAs 56
NAYs 43
Not Voting 1
[….]
Missouri: Blunt (R-MO), Yea
McCaskill (D-MO), Nay
[….]
“….We have a new test. You must disagree with the president who nominates you. Let me say that again because we love common sense in Missouri and this defies common sense. You must vote against a nominee for the cabinet of the duly elected President of the United States because she agrees with the duly President of the United States…..”
Senator Claire McCaskill (D), yesterday, on the floor of the United States Senate:
The transcript:
Senator Claire McCaskill (D): Mister President, uh, briefly, this should be, um, a happy day for America. This should be a day that is circled in the calendar as another day as the, as the President of the Senate knows that this is about the American dream. This woman is the embodiment of the American dream in action. We should be celebrating her confirmation to the most important law enforcement position in the United states of America.
So why am I not happy? I am sad. I am depressed. Because what we are gonna witness in a few minutes is base politics at its ugliest. Doesn’t get any uglier than this. Because what we are saying today, what my colleagues on the other side of the aisle are saying today, it doesn’t matter if you’re qualified. It doesn’t matter if you’re one of the most qualified nominees for Attorney General in the history of our country. That makes no difference. We have a new test. You must disagree with the president who nominates you. Let me say that again because we love common sense in Missouri and this defies common sense. You must vote against a nominee for the cabinet of the duly elected President of the United States because she agrees with the duly President of the United States.
think of the consequences of that vote. Think what that means to the future of advise and consent in this Senate if we all adopt this base politics play to the cheap seat I can’t get elected President unless I’m against Loretta Lynch. If we all adopt that in the future how is any president elected in this country going to assemble a cabinet? Because it will be incumbent on all of us to be against cabinet members who have the nerve to agree with the president who has selected them for his team.
It is beyond depressing. It’s disgusting. She is so qualified, she has worked so hard all her life. She is a prosecutor’s prosecutor. She’s prosecuted more terrorists than almost anybody on the face of the planet. And the notion that this has occurred because she agrees with the man who selected her – I think everyone needs to understand what that means for the future if all of us embrace that kind of base politics in these decisions.
It is not a happy day. It is a very sad day. I am proud of who Loretta Lynch is. I am proud that she will be Attorney General of this country. I am sad that it will be such a close vote.
During Senate floor speech, Senator blasts unprecedented opposition to first Attorney General nominee who’s ever prosecuted terrorists
Thursday, April 23, 2015
WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Claire McCaskill took to the Senate floor today and called out her Republican colleagues for their unprecedented opposition to Loretta Lynch’s 166 day-long nomination for the post of U.S. Attorney General.
Lynch-who has had to wait more than twice as long as the previous seven Attorneys General combined for a confirmation vote-will be the first Attorney General to have previously prosecuted terrorists.
[….]
“We should be celebrating her confirmation to the most important law enforcement position in the United States of America,” McCaskill said. “So why am I not happy? I am sad. I am depressed. Because what we are going to witness in a few minutes is base politics at its ugliest. Doesn’t get any uglier than this. Because what we are seeing today, what my colleagues on the other side of the aisle are saying today, is it doesn’t matter if you’re qualified. It doesn’t matter if you are one of the most qualified nominees for Attorney General in the history of our country. That makes no difference. We have a new test. You must disagree with the President who nominates you…we love common sense in Missouri and this defies common sense.”
When Lynch was nominated to be the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York in 2000, her nomination was approved by the Republican-led Judiciary Committee and confirmed unanimously by the Republican-led Senate. In 2010, when she was re-nominated to this post, Lynch was again approved by the Judiciary Committee and confirmed unanimously by the full Senate.
Lynch’s nomination today was narrowly approved by the Senate by a vote of 56-43, and she will replace Eric Holder as Attorney General.
###
“….Think what that means to the future of advise and consent in this Senate if we all adopt this base politics play to the cheap seat I can’t get elected President unless I’m against Loretta Lynch. If we all adopt that in the future how is any president elected in this country going to assemble a cabinet….?”
![Senator Claire McCaskill (D) [2016 file photo].](https://i0.wp.com/showmeprogress.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/img_5573.jpg?ssl=1)