• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Tag Archives: Obamacare

Sen. Roy Blunt (r): While you didn’t exactly ask…

25 Wednesday Mar 2015

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

ACA, missouri, Obamacare, Roy Blunt, Twitter

…you did get some answers.

Senator Roy Blunt (r) [August 2013 file photo].

Senator Roy Blunt (r), via Twitter, on Monday:

Senator Roy BluntVerified @RoyBlunt

As we mark #ObamaCare’s 5th anniv today, I’m still fighting to repeal & replace this law w/common-sense solutions [….] 11:25 AM – 23 Mar 2015

People appear to like their Obamacare. Fancy that. A few of the responses:

Lance Finney ‏@LMFinney

@RoyBlunt The ACA lowers costs, increases access, and saves lives. Fighting that isn’t common sense. 11:27 AM – 23 Mar 2015

Austin Allison ‏@azta110790

.@RoyBlunt I have yet to hear you list a single “common-sense solution”. 11:28 AM – 23 Mar 2015

Brad Anderson ‏@bja009

@RoyBlunt How about requiring more transparency in the pricing and billing of healthcare services? Propose that. 11:32 AM – 23 Mar 2015

Ph.D Street Smarts ‏@GOPHatesUsWhy

And take hc from millions who just got it.. real manly of you GOPeers; REALLY, MANLY!! @RoyBlunt 11:34 AM – 23 Mar 2015

Rick Pendleton ‏@Racefan_45

@RoyBlunt what do u have to replace it with or am I just suppose to go without health care insurance at all?????? 11:35 AM – 23 Mar 2015

Brady Shea ‏@bmatthewshea

. @RoyBlunt I would be fine with a single-payer system – replace it with that. (Ha) Until you can give specific solution, please STFU 11:40 AM – 23 Mar 2015

Leslie G. ‏@kckitty

@RoyBlunt I like my healthcare. Because of Obamacare, its cheaper and better! 11:54 AM – 23 Mar 2015

Terry Linhardt ‏@tlinhardt

@RoyBlunt Please list all of your common-sense solutions. Are they on your web site for all to view? 1:27 PM – 23 Mar 2015

Rich Zellich ‏@zellich

@RoyBlunt Don’t repeal it, fix the problems it has. It was a GOP idea in the first place, why do you think it’s wrong now? 6:08 PM – 23 Mar 2015

Heh.

Don’t you just love social media? It’s taken the old practice of yelling at your television set when somebody on it said something really stupid and given that expression of contempt a giant megaphone in the ether of the electronic public sphere.

Previously:

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): ask and ye shall receive (March 21, 2015)

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): ask and ye shall receive

21 Saturday Mar 2015

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

4th Congressional District, ACA, facebook, missouri, Obamacare, Vicky Hartzler

Representative Vicky Hartzler (r) [August 2014 file photo].

Representative Vicky Hartzler (r) posted a request on Facebook yesterday, looking for responses to her question about the Affordable Care Act:

Congresswoman Vicky Hartzler

Yesterday at 10:31am ·

Have you run into troubles with your taxes due to Obamacare? Has Obamacare given you a headache instead of a cure? I want to hear your story. As Tax Day nears, visit my website and tell me how Obama’s onerous “tax” has affected you.

[….]

[emphasis added]

Much hilarity ensued. A few of the responses:

[….] You don’t want my story because I’m totally satisfied with the ACA. Sorry to disappoint you in your search for validation.

Yesterday at 10:41am

[….] I haven’t had any issues with ACA or taxes. Thanks for asking!

Yesterday at 10:47am

[….] As someone who can’t afford health insurance, I wasn’t fined for not having health insurance. Find a new witch to hunt.

Yesterday at 10:50am

[….] My son was able to get medical insurance because of the Affordable Care Act. Please don’t play politics with this.

Yesterday at 10:53am

[….] Congresswoman Hartzler > Instead of looking for only negative stories that fit your narrative of Obama-bashing, why don’t you pretend to be less partisan and ask for honest feedback of ALL kinds? Lots of people have good stories to tell about their experience with the Affordable Care Act… why not seek the truth, instead of only the negativity? There are bad aspects to it, to be sure, but your job is to find ways to IMPROVE it, not to engage in hate sessions with your constituents. Don’t forget that this kind of childish behavior is remembered at election time. It is beneath your office to behave like this. We deserve better.

Yesterday at 11:01am

[….] Nothing could have been easier!

Yesterday at 11:34am

[….] I’ve had no problems with the ACA and filing my taxes was a breeze. Thanks for asking!

Yesterday at 11:37am

[….] Over 16.5 MILLION people now have insurance because of this onerous program. You morons would do well to get REAL!

Yesterday at 11:42am

[….] Onerous program? do you no realize it cuts the deficit and repealing it would add hundreds of billions to the deficit?

Yesterday at 11:48am

[….] How long is Congress going to allow obama to destroy this Country

Yesterday at 11:55am

Not on point, but okay then.

[….] Obama Care is working for millions of Americans, just check the numbers. I wish you would spend more time on looking into what really needs attention like rebuilding our failing infrastructure, which would add many jobs and thus boost our economy.

Yesterday at 12:19pm

[….] My 17 years living without health insurance were worse than any IRS issue.

Yesterday at 1:06pm

[….] My coverage got better!! With no increase in premium or out of pocket

Yesterday at 1:24pm

And another’s reply to that:

[….] That’s great! Mine was similar. A slight increase in premiums but nothing that doesn’t make me rejoice for the millions who are now covered.

Yesterday at 3:39pm

[….] Why would ANYONE need a Story? The Fact that obama and His Treasonous Democrats Voted for, Passed and Exempted themselves and thier staffers from Commie Care.

Yesterday at 2:44pm

Ah, Faux News Channel alternate reality. There were a few other responses that had complaints.

Most were positive.

[….] How clueless are you exactly, Congresswoman? Americans overwhelming support ACA (even your fellow Reptilians support it in polls when it is called by it’s actually name and not “Obamacare, which proves how stupid your constituents are) – there are more people protected by insurance currently in the country than EVER in history thanks to ACA.

Yet you and your idiotic cronies keep wasting time and money on trying to repeal something that HELPS the majority of Americans? And, in the same breath want to tell us you AREN’T owned by your Corporate Lords & Masters??? The only ones more stupid than you are the inbreds that voted for you.

Yesterday at 3:14pm

[….] The problem with republicans is they’re all chiefs and no Indians. If this congresswoman has a better way to ensure all have access to quality and affordable care, let’s hear it. Otherwise she should shut her pie hole and be grateful she gets 200 thousand a year from taxpayers to do nothing.

Yesterday at 3:16pm

[….] I have health insurance BECAUSE OF the ACA; I wouldn’t be able to get it without that. “Pre-existing condition” is something that eventually affects everyone!!!!

I agree; if you have a better plan, cough it up. Otherwise please STFU.

Yesterday at 3:20pm

[….] Stupid Congress woman. GOP healthcare=toe tag and a morgue drawer

Yesterday at 3:34pm

[….] It was good for me. Bashing it, won’t help anyone.

23 hrs

[….] Would you like to hear my story? It’s been great! I have been able to keep my kids on insurance throughout their college years. My husband who has a preexisting condition would have been “uninsurable” now has options. Preventative care is covered.

23 hrs

[….] Its been a huge help to my entire family, and to many readers of my newspaper column. Some are saving hundreds or even thousands of dollars a year; some have health insurance for the first time since they aged out of their parents’ policy. Please stop these politically motivated and ill-advised attacks on a long overdue program.

22 hrs

[….] No Vicky, I had problems BEFORE the ACA. My problems were no insurance and now I’m covered. No thanks to you.

19 hrs

[….] Our family is very pleased with the ACA. We now have access to more medical services, we haven’t had to pay any copays, and the coverage network area has increased. Before the ACA we paid $1,100 per month for a $3,000 individual/$6500 family deductible. We now pay $600 per month for a $500 individual/$1,000 family deductible – with better services.

46 mins

That went well.

HB 1139: going to the barber for a bleeding

10 Tuesday Mar 2015

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

ACA, Caleb Rowden, General Assembly, HB 1139, missouri, Obamacare

That’ll stop the bleeding for sure.

Representative Caleb Rowden (r) [2013 file photo].

A bill, introduced today by Representative Caleb Rowden (r):

HB 1139

Creates an income tax deduction for certain penalties assessed under the Affordable Care Act and paid on a federal return

Sponsor: Rowden, Caleb (044)

Proposed Effective Date: 8/28/2015

LR Number: 2496L.01I

Last Action: 03/09/2015 – Introduced and Read First Time (H)

Bill String: HB 1139

[….]

FIRST REGULAR SESSION

HOUSE BILL NO. 1139 [pdf]

98TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY

INTRODUCED BY REPRESENTATIVE ROWDEN.

2496L.01I D. ADAM CRUMBLISS, Chief Clerk

AN ACT

To amend chapter 143, RSMo, by adding thereto one new section relating to a deduction for certain federal tax payments.

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the state of Missouri, as follows:

Section A. Chapter 143, RSMo, is amended by adding thereto one new section, to be known as section 143.845, to read as follows:

143.845. In addition to all deductions listed in this chapter, a taxpayer shall be allowed a deduction for amounts assessed and paid under Section 5000A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. As used in this section, “deduction” shall mean an amount subtracted from the taxpayer’s Missouri adjusted gross income to determine Missouri taxable income for the tax year in which such deduction is claimed.

[emphasis in original]

So, Missouri taxpayers are currently only paying for Medicaid expansion in other states because the republican controlled General Assembly won’t do anything to address the issue of the uninsured in Missouri. And while they’re at it, in their infinite wisdom, they want to reduce Missouri’s revenue (and, think about the cascading effects, while increasing Missouri’s health care costs) while their inaction on Medicaid continues to siphon Missouri taxpayer dollars to other states.

What a clown show.

Who kills the most Americans?

08 Sunday Mar 2015

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

health and safety regulations, immigration, King vs. Burwell, Medicaid expansion, missouri, mortalilty rates, Obamacare, Pete Sessions, pollution, republicans

It seems that House Rules Committee Chairman Pete Sessions (R-TX) is worried that undocumented immigrants are driving up our murder statistics:

SESSIONS: Every day, all along border states, maybe other places, there are murders by people who have been arrested coming into this country, who have been released by the Obama administration, I believe in violation of the law, who are murdering Americans all over our cities.

We hold the Democrat Party and the President accountable for this action.

Of course, surprise, surprise, Sessions is, so to speak, dead wrong. Worse, he’s using what are probably purposely skewed statistics. As Think Progress observes:

The Washington Post’s Fact Checker ranked Sessions’ statistics with four Pinocchios, the highest rating given for inaccurate statements. They found no evidence that undocumented immigrants who benefited from the president’s immigration policies were responsible for the deaths of Americans on a daily basis.

Nevertheless, Sessions approach to the issue – blame the President and the Democratic party – suggests that we need to take a look at who or what is really, verifiably, killing Americans and assign blame accordingly.

Let’s start with the number of poor Americans who will die in those states that have failed to expand Medicaid. A study published early last year puts the number of deaths in Missouri that will result from lack of medical attention at between 218 and 700 people a year. The estimated number of deaths each year in all of the states combined that have opted of Medicaid will fall between 7,115 and 17,104. By Sessions logic, the folks responsible for these deaths will be the Republican lawmakers who refused to hold their nose and endorse a conservative health care reform offered up by a black, Democratic president. How will we hold the GOP contingent in Jefferson City accountable for all those dead Missourians? Who will hold the Republican lawmakers in the other recalcitrant states accountable for what they have done in the service of rampant conservatism run amok?

Then let’s move to the King vs. Burwell Supreme Court challenge to Obamacare itself. If the justices uphold the challenge, the result could be the unraveling of the entire healthcare reform and a return to chaos in the healthcare system. People will lose their healthcare. The result will will be dead Americans:

A brief filed on behalf of multiple public health scholars and the American Public Health Association, estimates that “over 9,800 additional Americans” will die if the justices side with the King plaintiffs. It reaches this conclusion by starting with an Urban Institute study showing that 8.2 million people will become uninsured in this scenario. As other research examining Obamacare-like reforms in the state of Massachusetts found that “for every 830 adults gaining insurance coverage there was one fewer death per year,” that translates to between 9,800 and 9,900 deaths if the justices back the plaintiffs in King.

So using the Sessions rule, who do we hold responsible for these deaths? Maybe start with the rightwing lawyers who, working under the aegis of the rabidly conservative American Enterprise Institute (AEI), and the Koch brothers-funded Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), spent a couple of years scoring the Act looking for a opening for an attack – and found it in a typo -you’ve got that right, a typo. Add in Republican lawmakers who vociferously support the lawsuit and who, they assure us,  will refuse to correct the typo that forms the basis of the challenge. Will anyone hold the rightwing think tanks, their corporate underwriters and their tame Republican politicians accountable for these deaths?

How about the estimated 24,000 lives that are lost in the U.S. as a result of lax regulation of coal particulates in the air? How about the thousands of coal miners who die yearly – according to Wikipedia, 3,200 miners died in 2007 alone – due to lax regulation of the mining industry? Shouldn’t the party of no regulations along with their corporate funders be held accountable for these and other deaths related to the failure to enact and enforce appropriate regulations?

I could go on and on counting off the various mechanisms of death for which the Republican party should be held accountable – we haven’t even touched on the wars pushed by Republican neo-cons in the past or their desire to embroil us in another similar war in Syria, Iraq, Iran, or what-have-you, or the massive die-offs that will result from climate-change ignored – but space and patience forces me to curtail the list.

There are two main implications to this death narrative. The first is that the GOP’s major operative principle is, “Give me market liberty or death,” and the inevitable resulting deaths are palatable to the Republican power-brokers and their underwriters because they are usually limited to the helpless and hopeless. That does not mean that the rest of us are helpless or hopeless to act or, at the very least, make sure that the blame is justly allocated.

Second, the potential deaths enumerated above are especially obscene just because they are potential. They could be avoided. But because of the willful obduracy of a few power-mad ideologues, the cynicism of and greed of other politicians, along with the equally willful ignorance of the people who vote for them, that’s probably not going to happen. Or it won’t happen if those of us who are appalled by the current and potential death-toll don’t get off our duffs and do something right now.

*Cross-posted to DailyKos with a few alterations.

There’s a simple one word answer

02 Monday Mar 2015

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

ACA, Elifah Haahr, General Assembly, missouri, Obamacare, Twitter

Die.

That’s the cruel reality.

An exchange via Twitter with Representative Elijah Haahr (r) on the subject of the Affordable Care Act case before the U.S. Supreme Court:

Elijah Haahr ‏@elijahhaahr

For legal nerds w no time, @BenchMemos summarizes the amicus briefs filed in #KingvBurwell including shout outs to @jadler1969 & @HawleyMO 8:24 AM – 2 Mar 2015

Taunia ‏@TauniaAdams

.@elijahhaahr What do you suggest Missourians on chemo do if they lose HC coverage b/c of #KingvBurwell ? #moleg http://bit.ly/1Gbpils 9:27 AM – 2 Mar 2015

Elijah Haahr ‏@elijahhaahr

@TauniaAdams Since the question of coverage is not before the court, perhaps you could stop scaring people with false rhetoric. 9:40 AM – 2 Mar 2015

Is that an assertion that people won’t lose their coverage due to a lack of affordability? It’s called the Affordable Care Act for a reason.

Taunia ‏@TauniaAdams

.@elijahhaahr “If she can no longer get that subsidy..” she can’t afford coverage. Suggestion? #KingvBurwell #moleg [….] 10:03 AM – 2 Mar 2015

Elijah Haahr ‏@elijahhaahr

.@TauniaAdams Yes. Tell her to lobby Congress & @BarackObama to repeal #Obamacare – a law that has to be read wrongly for her to use it. 10:08 AM – 2 Mar 2015

That “read wrongly” part has yet to be determined. Uh, and with repeal of the ACA what replaces it? Preexisting condition exclusions? Just asking.

Taunia ‏@TauniaAdams

.@elijahhaahr Asking again: what’s your plan for Missourians who lose healthcare coverage if #KingvBurwell sustained? #moleg 10:22 AM – 2 Mar 2015

Elijah Haahr ‏@elijahhaahr

@TauniaAdams Repeal Obamacare and create a system that works without needing the IRS to break the law for it to be effective. 10:25 AM – 2 Mar 2015

What a tool.

Replace it with single payer? Right.

Would that new system the republicans are thinking about include a prohibition of denial of coverage for preexisting conditions, a prohibition of rescission of coverage, eliminate lifetime coverage limits, regulate annual insurance limits, and allow young adults to stay on their parents’ coverage until age 26? Oh, wait.

Taunia ‏@TauniaAdams

.@elijahhaahr Repeal #ACA, replace w/ non-existing GOP HC plan; about 2/3 years. What do chemo patients do during? #KingvBurwell #moleg 10:50 AM – 2 Mar 2015

There’s an answer. Die.

Mike Moon: The sexism is expected; the cruelty is is the problem

10 Tuesday Feb 2015

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

ACA, Claire McCaskill, health care policy, Mike Moon, Missouori, Obamacare, sexism

As Michael Bersin pointed out earlier today, Claire McCaskill can get to the heart of the matter when it’s necessary. She made it clear that the problem with Rep. Mike Moon’s (R-157) legislative resolution “calling for the Missouri Congressional delegation to “endeavor with ‘manly firmness’ and resolve to totally and completely repeal” and not replace the 2010 Affordable Care Act” isn’t the reflexively sexist language that he used. The problem is his cheering for “kicking folks off their health coverage and once again letting insurance companies discriminate against women and sick people.” It’s his meanness plain and simple that got McCaskill riled up.

The sexist language is just par for the course. This is the same Rep. Moon who last year advocated closing down the last clinic in Missouri where women could exercise their choice to procure an abortion. His idea of humor includes this tweet: “#FailedCharities The Sandra Fluke Recycled Contraceptive Program” – not surprising since he is endorsed by Missouri Right to Life (MRL), an endorsement that carries with it, according to MRL, an assurance that the candidate supports the such extreme positions as banning abortion with, ideally, no exceptions for rape or incest; banning emergency contraception, birth control pills, and IUDs; along with support for “personhood” amendments. These bozos even oppose membership in the Girl Scouts because they “they link to the “pro-abortion World Health Organization” on their website.”  

Rep Moon, however, seems to be somewhat bewildered by the attention Senator McCaskill’s response has focused on  his effort to pander to that especially tribal segment of the Republican base that gets upset whenever anyone suggests that our government has an obligation to work for the well-being of all its citizens. Not only does he think the issue is just language, but he also seems to be bewildered by the way language works:

“It is just like going to war,” Moon said. “You want a soldier to fight like a man. If a woman is in the trenches, you want them to fight like a man, too.”

Because the measure of bravery is manliness, right? But Rep. Moon wasn’t through, though, ramming his foot down his throat:

Moon said he does not believe that being a male makes him a better lawmaker than his female colleagues. “I know there are some women who are much smarter than I am and I tip my hat to them.”

Well, I’m glad to know that Rep Moon knows “some” smart women – not to mention that he’s now tipped his hat to them. Isn’t this line of reasoning similar to the “friends” fallacy. You know: “I’m not a racist, some of my best friends are black,” I’m not homophobic, I know some gay people,” or “I’m not a murderer, I know lots of living people”?

But of course, the real offence isn’t that Rep. Moon is the foot-soldier in the GOP War on Women he has already revealed himself to be by his actual legislative agenda, but that that agenda, as Senator McCaskill correctly points out, is just plain mean, and, worse, mean for no practical reason. In Moon’s mind the real message he was trying to send was that members of his own party who are calling for Obamacare to be replaced are weak (and, yes, he does seem to think that equates to femininity); he wants to make it clear that the real problem with Obamacare isn’t in how it does what it does, but rather that it does anything at all. Moon wants government totally out of healthcare, he clearly believes it has no role to play in the well-being of its citizens. In his own words:

… . “It was not meant to downplay their womanhood at all. We just want them to know, every man and lady who is representing us, that we are demanding, as citizens of Missouri, that Obamacare be repealed and make it clear we don’t want a replacement.”

And the folks who can’t afford to provide their own healthcare can just die. This isn’t just misogyny, it’s misanthropy. It’s so mean the mind boggles. We can do lots better in the United States. McCaskill was right to aim her metaphorical kick at his metaphorical backside. Good on you, Claire.

*Slightly edited for clarity.

HR 99: Because words mean nothing?

10 Tuesday Feb 2015

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

ACA, General Assembly, HR 99, Mike Moon, missouri, Obamacare

“….the members of the Missouri House of Representatives, Ninety-eighth General Assembly, hereby insist that each member of the Missouri Congressional delegation endeavor with “manly firmness” and resolve to totally and completely repeal the Affordable Care Act….”

Not totally enlightened.

A might touchy:

Matt Wills ‏@gopmatty

Leave it Missouri Dems to pick on language and not substance. Newflash: this is why you continue to lose #moleg seats. 9:12 PM – 9 Feb 2015

Yeah, right. Words have no meaning.

With ‘manly firmness’: Lawmaker calls on members of Congress to repeal ACA, oppose replacement

By Rudi Keller

Monday, February 9, 2015 at 6:08 pm

JEFFERSON CITY – State Rep. Mike Moon wants the Affordable Care Act repealed and according to a House resolution he’s sponsoring, it will take the proper application of “Y” chromosomes to get the job done….

[….]

….Rep. Wanda Brown, R-Lincoln, said she opposes Obamacare because “it is truly just an expansion of Medicaid. Medicaid is a terrible system. It is a broken system and we need to look at fixing problems, not increasing problems.”

She could not be more firm in her opposition to the law, Brown said. When shown the “manly firmness” provision, she shook her head and walked away, declining to comment.

State Rep. Stephen Webber, D-Columbia, said the language is unnecessary and insulting to Hartzler, Wagner and McCaskill. “It is a throwback to this idea of gender roles and I can’t believe anyone in 2015 talks like that. We have numerous female members of the congressional delegation, whether I agree with them or not they are capable of being strong people no matter what their gender is.”

We noted this a while back:

HR 99: Are those instructions good for Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r) and Rep. Ann Wagner (r)? (January 20, 2015)

[….]

“….WHEREAS, the Missouri House of Representatives agrees with the four United States Supreme Court justices about the unconstitutionality of the ACA, and finds that act to be most injurious of the basic freedoms Missouri citizens deserve….”

That and $1.50 will get you downtown on the bus. If your town has a bus.

And then there’s this call to action:

“….the members of the Missouri House of Representatives, Ninety-eighth General Assembly, hereby insist that each member of the Missouri Congressional delegation endeavor with “manly firmness” and resolve to totally and completely repeal the Affordable Care Act….”

We’re quite certain Representatives Hartzler (r) and Wagner (r) appreciate the sentiment behind the unfortunate use of language.

[….]

Right. Because four U.S. Supreme Court justices voting one way is more than five U.S. Supreme Court justices voting the other way.

Math is hard.

HR 99: Are those instructions good for Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r) and Rep. Ann Wagner (r)?

21 Wednesday Jan 2015

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

ACA, General Assembly, HR 99, Mike Moon, missouri, Obamacare

Just asking.

What your right wingnut controlled Missouri General Assembly spends it’s time on:

FIRST REGULAR SESSION

House Resolution No. 99 [pdf]

98TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY

INTRODUCED BY REPRESENTATIVE MOON.

1451L.01I

WHEREAS, in 2010, the United States Congress passed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as “Obamacare”; and

WHEREAS, the act was passed under questionable circumstances in which the United States Senate completely revised the language in H.R. 3590, a bill regarding housing tax breaks for service members, and used it as the vehicle for the ACA in order to skirt the technical requirements that a tax bill originate in the House; and

WHEREAS, four of the United States Supreme Court justices found the ACA to be an unconstitutional expansion of federal power in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius; and

WHEREAS, to even consider National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, the United States Supreme Court had to declare that the ACA wasn’t a tax bill, but the five justices who found it to be constitutional justified their opinion based on the taxing powers of the federal government; and

WHEREAS, the ACA affects as much as 1/6 of the economy and the ability of citizens to participate in a free and open health care market and has caused numerous health insurance companies to leave the market, resulting in a consolidation of health insurance services in fewer providers; and

WHEREAS, the implementation of the ACA has been fraught with problems; and

WHEREAS, as of the Spring of 2014, the number of uninsured Americans had decreased less than 5%; and

WHEREAS, Missouri voters have twice overwhelmingly rejected Obamacare through ballot initiatives, including Proposition C in 2010, which prohibits mandating the purchase of 30 health care related products and services, and through the passage of Proposition E in 2012, which prohibits the Governor and state agencies from implementing a health insurance exchange independent of the General Assembly; and

WHEREAS, voters in Missouri and across the United States have repeatedly elected officials from both the Republican and Democrat parties based on their promise to fight the Affordable Care Act, and there now are clearly enough members of the United States House and Senate to pass a bill repealing it; and

WHEREAS, the Missouri House of Representatives agrees with the four United States Supreme Court justices about the unconstitutionality of the ACA, and finds that act to be most injurious of the basic freedoms Missouri citizens deserve; and

WHEREAS, the People, in Article I, Section 2 of the Missouri Constitution, have declared that the “principal office of government” is to “give security” to their core liberties and that when a legislature fails to secure the People’s liberty “it fails in its chief design”; and

WHEREAS, each and every Representative has taken an oath to support the Constitutions of the United States and Missouri, and thereby has a personal responsibility to defend the People’s liberty:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that we, the members of the Missouri House of Representatives, Ninety-eighth General Assembly, hereby insist that each member of the Missouri Congressional delegation endeavor with “manly firmness” and resolve to totally and completely repeal the Affordable Care Act, settling for no less than a full repeal; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chief Clerk of the Missouri House of Representatives be instructed to prepare properly inscribed copies of this resolution for the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, the President of the United States Senate, and each member of the Missouri Congressional delegation.

[emphasi in original]

“….WHEREAS, the Missouri House of Representatives agrees with the four United States Supreme Court justices about the unconstitutionality of the ACA, and finds that act to be most injurious of the basic freedoms Missouri citizens deserve….”

That and $1.50 will get you downtown on the bus. If your town has a bus.

And then there’s this call to action:

“….the members of the Missouri House of Representatives, Ninety-eighth General Assembly, hereby insist that each member of the Missouri Congressional delegation endeavor with “manly firmness” and resolve to totally and completely repeal the Affordable Care Act….”

We’re quite certain Representatives Hartzler (r) and Wagner (r) appreciate the sentiment behind the unfortunate use of language.

Yes, we know Senator Claire McCaskill (D) is also part of the Missouri congressional delegation, we just didn’t have enough room for her title and name on the headline.

Oh, and Obamacare is evil, too

02 Tuesday Dec 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Bob Onder, General Assembly, Medicaid, missouri, Obamacare, SB 51

So there. A bill, prefiled yesterday for the 2015 session in the Senate by newly elected right wingnut Bob Onder (r):

SB 51 Relating to prohibiting governments from compelling individuals to purchase health insurance and participate in health care systems

Sponsor: Onder

LR Number: 0574S.01I Fiscal Note not available

Committee:

Last Action: 12/1/2014 – Prefiled

[….]

Current Bill Summary

SB 51 – This act modifies what is commonly known as the Health Care Freedom Act which was approved by the Missouri voters in 2010. The act restates Missouri’s public policy of allowing its citizens the freedom to choose or decline to choose any mode of securing health care services without facing a penalty and provides that it is against Missouri public policy to implement or operate a health insurance exchange in Missouri. The act also posits several findings of fact of how the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and implementing a state-based exchange would subject Missouri citizens and employers to penalties. The act further provides that if a health insurance issuer operating in Missouri accepts any remuneration that may result in the imposition of penalties contrary to Missouri’s public policy, then the Director of Insurance shall suspend the issuer’s license to transact business in Missouri. The suspension will stay in place until the issuer represents that it has returned the remuneration to its source and will decline any such future remuneration. The act further imposes a duty upon the Attorney General to seek injunctive relief and other appropriate remedies whenever the public policy set forth in the act is being violated.

This act is identical to SB 546 (2014) and SB 473 (2013).

[….]

You were expecting anything different?

Previously:

You were expecting anything different? (December 1, 2014)

It’ll be a cold day in the General Assembly… (December 1, 2014)

Now we’re just waiting on the Agenda 21, Sharia law and nullification bills (December 1, 2014)

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): the human face on the consequences of your rigid ideology

18 Saturday Oct 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

4th Congressional District, ACA, homecoming, missouri, Obamacare, parade, preexisting condition, Randy Huggins, Vicky Hartzler, Warrensburg

The annual University of Central Missouri homecoming parade took place in Warrensburg today. In election years local (and sometimes statewide) politicians walk the parade and greet people along the route. The lineup for the parade starts at around 7:30 a.m. Almost everyone is waiting in place by the time the parade starts at 9:00 a.m., though the politicians usually don’t step off into the parade route until around 10:00 a.m. The wait gives those in the parade an opportunity to converse, talk, visit, schmooze, or whatever you want to call it.

This morning before the parade started Representative Vicky Hartzler (r) met Randy Huggins’ grandson for the first time.

Representative Vicky Hartzler (r) in the University of Central Missouri homecoming parade in Warrensburg this morning.

Over five years ago then candidate Vicky Hartzler (r) held a health care town hall in Warrensburg:

A health care story (September 3, 2009)

[….]

SMP: And, and you’ve told your story in a variety of, of places. Last week you attended a, another forum for, in this area. Could you tell me about that?

Randy Huggins:…Last Thursday I went to a health care information forum, I guess you could call it, Vicki Hartzler [a declared Republican candidate for the 4th Congressional District seat] held here. And she had concerns about the legislation and she had things that she liked about the legislation. Then she said she had solutions. The solution that she offered for the pre-existing condition my grandson had was, she offered to bring the family a, a hot meal. [pause] We’re hungry, but that’s not gonna help his heart, so.

SMP: And so, do you, do you feel some frustration when, when dealing with this, you know, the subject of health care reform and when you feel like people give you solutions that really aren’t solutions?

Randy Huggins: Absolutely it’s frustrating. [pause] I, I just, I don’t understand where they’re coming from. Why they can’t see the need to fix, the system’s broken. And they don’t see any need to fix it or to change it in any way. Just….

[….]

Randy Huggins and his grandson after the homecoming parade in Warrensburg – October 18, 2014.

Randy Huggins informed us that he approached Representative Hartzler (r) this morning and introduced his grandson to her. She was pleasant in her response and probably wasn’t yet making the connection.

He then told her this was the grandson who had the congenital heart defect for which his daughter’s health insurance denied coverage because they considered it a preexisting condition. He added that this was the grandson for which she had suggested people could bring a hot meal to the family to help out. He told us that she was somewhat rattled and responded about the propriety of making it political.

Representative Vicky Hartzler (r) and the republican party made it political in 2009. She continues to make it political and makes the consequences of losing health care very real for millions of Americans ever time she votes to dismantle the Affordable Care Act. This morning Representative Vicky Hartzler (r) had to face just one story in that reality.

Previously:

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): the Affordable Care Act and what repeal really means to one family (July 13, 2012)

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • Taigan Plummer (D): listening to voters
  • Morning storm
  • Campaign Finance: Next
  • Mike Kehoe (r) and the right wingnut controlled Missouri General Assembly lay eggs
  • Denny Hoskins (r) is a pre-eminent legal scholar and final arbiter of the Missouri Constitution, said no one ever…

Recent Comments

Campaign Finance: Ne… on Campaign Finance: once again,…
Denny Hoskins (r) is… on Denny Hoskins: Noun, Verb…CPA?
The correct answer i… on Campaign Finance: throw in dar…
The correct answer i… on Bait and switch
The correct answer i… on About that ‘inconvenient…

Archives

  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,080,019 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...