• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Tag Archives: Planned Parenthood

Missouri: Medieval

28 Tuesday May 2019

Posted by Michael Bersin in Missouri General Assembly, Resist

≈ 17 Comments

Tags

#resist, abortion, anti-choice, missouri, Planned Parenthood, social media, Twitter

Pre 1973 2019 medical equipment.

News today:

Planned Parenthood @PPFA
BREAKING: Missouri could soon become the first state in the country to have no health center that provides safe, legal abortion, leaving more than a million people in a situation we haven’t seen since Roe v. Wade.

This is unacceptable. Abortion care is health care. Period.
[….]
10:12 AM – 28 May 2019

The forced birther trolling in the comments…

Pre 1973 2019 medical instruments.

Previously:

HB 126 and HB 127: catering to their single issue base (December 3, 2018)

Gov. Mike Parson (r): Alabama, hold my beer… (May 15, 2019)

Gov. Mike Parson (r): New York is shorthand for what? (May 16, 2019)

Medieval (May 17, 2019)

Sen. Denny Hoskins (r): post session victory dance over any individal woman’s personal medical decisions (May 17, 2019)

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): the 13th Century GOP in 21st Century America (May 20, 2019)

HB 126: the elephant in the womb (May 24, 2019)

HB 126: “…here for the ratio” (May 25, 2016)

“Pro-life” vitriol

03 Saturday Mar 2018

Posted by Michael Bersin in Missouri General Assembly, Missouri House, social media

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

anti-choice, General Assembly, guns, missouri, Planned Parenthood, social media, Stacey Newman, Tom Estes, Twitter

Almost two years ago:

Planned Parenthood shooter ‘happy’ with his attack
Trevor Hughes, USA TODAY Published 9:30 p.m. ET April 11, 2016 | Updated 7:14 a.m. ET April 12, 2016
“….[Robert] Dear was carrying four Soviet-style SKS semi-automatic rifles, and shot from inside the clinic at propane tanks he’d set out as improvised bombs, although they didn’t explode as planned…”

Yesterday, via Twitter from Representative Stacey Newman (D):

RepStaceyNewman @staceynewman
And I’m with my #moleg seatmate and my Congressman @LacyClayMO1! #BanAssaultWeapons
[….]
12:52 PM – 2 Mar 2018

A response from a republican staffer:

Tom Estes @TomJEstes
Should we ban the assault weapons used at Planned Parenthood? #moleg
[….]
3:49 PM – 2 Mar 2018

Uh.

Tom Estes
@TomJEstes
Christian. Man. Husband. Father. Preacher. Conservative. Pro-Life. Traditional marriage. #MOLeg Senate Staffer. God’s opinion is supreme. Personal Account.
Jefferson City, MO

Much hilarity ensues

25 Wednesday Oct 2017

Posted by Michael Bersin in social media

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

2nd Congressional District, Ann Wagner, Planned Parenthood, Satan, social media, Twitter

Today, via Representative Ann Wagner’s (r) non-Congressional Twitter account:

Ann Wagner‏ @AnnLWagner
I refuse to stand by as Satanists challenge the sanctity of life. Add your name if you stand in support of #LIFE [….]
4:06 PM – 25 Oct 2017

The link goes to Ann Wagner’s campaign web site:

Satanists have teamed up with the ACLU and Planned Parenthood in Missouri to roll back the rights of the unborn. Help Ann fight back – add your name now to stand up for life.

Some of the responses on Twitter:

FOH. I don’t want to hear one word about the “sanctity of life” from the same crowd that refuses to do anything about mass shootings.

All hail the forced birth party! #forcedbirth

The Satanists have higher principles than you so-called Christians.

Pseudo-Christians.

Apparently the real Church of Satan issued a statement:

We have nothing to do with this. Our statement: [….]

Nah. Even If I have to stand with satanists to protect a woman’s right to control her own health & reproductive choices, I will.
Hail Satan!

I support criminal investigations of all miscarriages too. Let’s get this ball rolling

Whatever drugs you’re currently taking need to be shared Ann.

I’m at Planned Parenthood right now, waiting for my annual exam. No Satanists here, as far as I can tell? You might want to visit sometime.

In the lobby there are several young women, one man, all the chairs are kinda dilapidated. No pentagrams, but there is a Rolling Stone issue

There are nice prints of flowers on the wall. Maybe the dance music on the radio has satanic lyrics if you play them backwards?

They are running a candy sale fundraiser (perhaps to help fund new chairs?). Perhaps M&Ms are a tool of Satan.

“Satanists”? Oh please.

hey, YOURE the one who wanted to give churches power to make decisions for individuals. Reap what you sow

Girl, what in God’s name are you talking about??

Ma’am put down the spray bottle of vinegar & step away from the tinfoil.

You are no better than Todd Akin was. I’m ashamed you represent my state.

Looks like somebody has been reading Brietbart

Hahaha. Silly person.

Hey we’re pretty nice heathens when you get to know us.

Nice bogeyman ya got there, Ann.

You simply are not capable of rational thought are you?

What on earth?

What the hell are you talking by about?

We see what you did there.

You do know that part of your brain can be used reasoning. Give it try.

Seriously?? Just stop.

Clearly, “sanity” is an imaginary concept, in your bunch! Whee-ooh, whee-ooh, that signpost up ahead, you’re lost in the Twilight Zone!

If this is your Halloween tweet, it’s scaring the bejeesus out of me. Get help!

This is a joke, right?

Um, probably not.

There are no words. Get help.

uhhh… don’t look now…but I’m pretty sure you’re completely insane.

What in the holy hell are you talking about? My word lady take a breather.

Satan is behind cutting off healthcare for millions of children too.

you seem fun.

Did you hit your head?

Lady, you cray.

My god, you’re a whack job.

What is wrong with you?

Geezus you’re a complete nutcase

Delete your account

I see that avoiding town hall meetings have driven you insane. #UnfitForOffice

You are friggin insane!!!

You are a complete loon

You seem quite stupid.

But it’s a dry heat

29 Saturday Jul 2017

Posted by Michael Bersin in Resist

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

#resist, Arizona, health care, Planned Parenthood, Trumpcare, Tucson

There were a number of “Our Lives on the Line” rallies supporting Medicaid, Medicare and the ACA across the country today. The rally in Tucson started at 10:00 a.m., in the July morning heat, with over thirty individuals attending.

OFA, Planned Parenthood, and LUCHA were among the sponsoring organizations.

“Our Lives On the Line” rally, Rudy Garcia Park, Tucson, Arizona, July 29, 2017.

There are thousands of health care stories:

Much like the Indivisible events in Kansas and Missouri, many attending these rallies tell their health care stories.

Previously:

Sen. Roy Blunt (r): there are thousands of health care stories (July 25, 2017)

Talking about health care at Sen. Roy Blunt’s (r) office in Kansas City – July 14, 2017 (July 14, 2017)

Planned Parenthood #PinkOut in Kansas City – June 21, 2017

22 Thursday Jun 2017

Posted by Michael Bersin in Resist

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

#PinkOut, #resist, health care, Kansas City, missouri, Planned Parenthood

Last night in midtown Kansas City well over a hundred supporters of Planned Parenthood, most dressed in pink, demonstrated in support of women’s health care on Emanuel Cleaver II Boulevard. This was one of many #PinkOut actions across the country.

The demonstration lasted over an hour until sunset.

In front of Planned Parenthood on Emanuel Cleaver II Boulevard in Kansas City – June 21, 2017.

“Nope.”

“These doors stay open.”

“I stand with Planned Parenthood.”

Toward the end of the demonstration the occupants of a passing car stopped in the street and joined in.

Dancing in the street.

“…Healthcare for Women.”

Women are leading the resistance.

Roy Blunt’s worried about Zika – but not enough to do what’s necessary

08 Thursday Sep 2016

Posted by willykay in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Clean Water Act, Pesticide use, Planned Parenthood, Roy Blunt, Zika

Roy Blunt’s coming off as a little self-righteous these days. On his congressional Web page the first thing I encountered was a news release about how we need to “find a solution” to the impasse on his Zika bill that has been stalled over almost the entire mosquito season. According to Blunt, who seemed very willing to let the bill languish during his seven week summer vacation, we need to do so “immediately.”

Seems Democrats have repeatedly voted against the current better-than-nothing-but-still-bad bill which was brokered and partially crafted by Blunt. So, you see, it’s Blunt’s ugly child that’s getting dissed and he’s not going to take it laying down. Especially not just before an election.

Why, you ask, are Democrats so determined to undermine the health of Americans faced with the spread of a dire disease? Seems it’s at least partially because they’re determined to defend the general health of Americans, particularly American women. Confused yet? Well, read on.

Republicans who tell us that they think that Zika is a pressing emergency have loaded the bill with provisions that, among other things, would deny Zika funds to Planned Parenthood in Puerto Rico where the virus is running rampant. Do you think anyone in the Republican party with minimal sanity – if there were any such animals – would have supposed that Democrats would allow them to use this emergency to set a precedent for denying funds to an agency so vital to the reproductive health of American women? It’s a dumb move even if you’re thinking only about the spread of Zika. Planned Parenthood specializes in reproductive health and contraception. Zika can be spread from infected individuals through sexual activity and can cause severe birth defects. See the connection? Too bad Republicans can’t.

Texas offers an instructive example of just how important Planned Parenthood can be when it comes to reproductive health in general and underlines why it needs to be defended from legislative inroads even aside from its potential impact in lessening the fallout from Zika. Texas cut funding to Planned Parenthood a few years ago. As Laura Basset of the Huffington Post reports, “an estimated 155,000 Texas women have lost access to birth control and basic preventative health care since 2011,” and “last year, the state ranked sixth worse in the nation in a report on women’s health, economic security and political empowerment by the Center for American Progress.”

That’s not the only way Blunt’s Zika bill would risk Americans’ long-term health. Republicans are also attempting to use the bill to weaken restrictions on pesticide use in bodies of water. They are seeking to nullify the provisions of the Clean Water Act and reopen the door to widespread pollution of American water ways which is not so good for children and other growing things. And the cherry on the sunday? The proposed GOP changes would do little to combat Zika mosquitoes since current rules don’t actually hinder necessary spraying – but they would make commercial pesticide interests very happy.

In his news release Blunt claims to be busy meeting with researchers and officials of the Center of Disease Control (CDC) about Zika funding, but if he’s really serious about the need to fight the spread of Zika, he needs to be twisting the arms of all the GOPers who think that a health crisis is a perfect opportunity to sneak in a few goodies for campaign contributors and the GOP’s hardcore, anti-abortion base – Americans’ health and well-being be dammed.

Kurt Schaefer and the pander principle

17 Wednesday Aug 2016

Posted by willykay in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Kurt Schaefer, Planned Parenthood, Protests

Remember how then potential Attorney General candidate, Kurt Schaeffer, like a dog with a really, really tasty bone, wouldn’t let go of the Planned Parenthood issue that erupted after a video surfaced that purported to show that the organization “sold baby parts.” Long after a state investigation cleared the Missouri Planned Parenthood affiliate of anything verboten, and, indeed, long after the videos themselves were widely discredited, Schaefer kept shaking that juicy, and, in terms of tax-dollars and legislative time, very expensive, ultimately imaginary bone.

Remember how he wanted to shut down abortions in Columbia by making the far-fetched claim that the University of Missouri was violating a law that forbids spending tax-dollars on abortions because the University Hospital gave a doctor who performed abortions at the Columbia Planned Parenthood the hospital privileges also required by state law? Remember how when a judge ruled against his efforts, he whined that Attorney General Chris Koster should “appeal immediately to enforce long-standing state law”? Expensive, time-consuming, futile. For sure. But Schaefer didn’t care. Then.

Well, guess what? Schaefer seems to have had his come-to-Jesus moment. As St. Louis Post-Dispatch columnist Tony Messenger put it:

… He [i.e., Schaefer] was the star witness for the defense — yes, the defense — in the case of 23 members of the clergy — most of them African-American — facing charges of trespassing and obstruction of the state Senate related to a protest they held on May 6, 2014, in the gallery of the Senate.

[…] on Tuesday, Schaefer stood up for the state constitution. He stood up for the law. He stood up for the principles of the First Amendment. He stood up for 23 people who never should have been charged with a crime, people who were in the Senate that day two and a half years ago to protest Schaefer’s stubborn opposition to allowing Medicaid expansion in Missouri.

While this principled stand is not, in itself, in opposition to his earlier actions in regard to Planned Parenthood, his rationale does give one pause:

“This case is all about prosecutorial discretion,” Schaefer told me after his testimony. “I just spent a whole lot of money telling Missourians about my prosecutorial experience. Well, you spend your resources on things that are real, not things like this. This case never should have come to trial.”

Too bad he didn’t remember this principle of “prosecutorial discretion” earlier. He could have saved the state a bundle and perhaps, just perhaps, the legislature might have had enough time to so some real work. Too bad that the principle he chose to observe instead was the pander principle.

Missouri GOPers run amok with taxpayer dollars

20 Friday May 2016

Posted by willykay in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

abortion, Medicaid extension, Planned Parenthood, Tobacco loophole, voter ID, Wasteful government spending

Paul Waldman described Donald Trump’s “flexibility” in regard to the rightwing gun culture as “a perfect expression of the larger Republican bargain, where the party’s elites pretend to share the base’s cultural values and priorities, and in exchange are put into office where they pursue an agenda of tax cuts and regulatory rollback.” We’ve seen lots of this type of trade-off in Missouri, although I’m not sure some of our dimmer legislators are just pretending to share the world view of their more backward constituents. There can be no doubt, however, that almost all GOPers in our state’s government elevate the welfare of rich constituents and campaign donors, in the form of tax cuts and regulatory rollbacks, over all else.

This dual focus on social conservatism and conservative economic ideology can create contradictions that are often costly for Missouri’s citizens. The just-ended Missouri legislative session demonstrates how middle and working class taxpayers often have to pony up to pay for the pursuit of GOP economic freedoms and religious preferences. The members of the erstwhile “fiscally responsible” party seemed ready to fall all over themselves to spend the taxpayers’ once sacred dollars on right-wing legislative trinkets.

Voter ID. Cost to taxpayers: $17 million over three years. If Missouri voters go ahead and agree to change the state’s constitution in order to implement voter ID, the law that was passed stipulates that “the state would be required to provide free photo IDs and any underlying documents necessary to obtain them, such as birth certificates and Social Security cards.” None of which comes free of charge. Voter ID is a pretty expensive “fix” for an alleged voter fraud problem that doesn’t actually exist. As for the estimated 220,000 Missourians who could be disenfranchised, for our free-market GOP it’s no big deal since suppressing potentially Democratic votes will make it easier to elect folks who want nothing more than to secure that vaunted economic freedom (i.e., tax cuts and regulatory rollback) for their wealthy patrons.

Planned Parenthood Cuts. Cost to taxpayers: $8 million in 2016. In a move to avoid legal repercussions that defunding Planned Parenthood of $4 million in federal dollars would incur, legislators sacrificed the $8 million dollars the federal government allocated to Missouri to pay for women’s reproductive health, and replaced it with Missouri taxpayer money that they stipulate cannot go to agencies that perform abortion. Of course, none of the federal money could have been used for abortions in the first place. The goal was to destroy Planned Parenthood, the only venue for abortion in Missouri. It was driven by a set of widely discredited, manipulated videos tricked out to show that the agency sold aborted fetal material for medical research purposes (utilizing aborted “Baby parts” to save lives! Oh! the horror!).

Failure to expand Medicaid. Cost to taxpayers: $16.2 billion over 10 years (plus $6.8 billion lost to Missouri hospitals). I hope that I don’t have to explain this item, and that you already realize that our lawmakers are willing to short state taxpayers in a major way for no reason other than they don’t like the black man in the White House and strategically attempt to sabotage all of his initiatives – particularly the successful ones like Obamacare that put Republicans in a bad light. Oh, and there’s that thing about encouraging dependency. Right-wing folks purport to believe that using the People’s government to ensure the People’s wellbeing is as immoral as making rich folks pay their fair share. Because, you know, dependency. Once again, that’s about $1.6 billion lost to Missouri taxpayers this year alone – not to mention the estimated 700 Missouri deaths that could have been prevented.

Failure to act on an agreement to close the tobacco loophole: Cost to taxpayers: $50 million. If you want to know more about the “tobacco loophole,” read this Politifact Missouri article. The important point for my argument is that by failing to act legislatively to update the state’s tobacco law subsequent to an agreement negotiated by Attorney General Chris Koster and several big tobacco companies, the legislature cost the state $50,000 this year. There’s no reason for this negligence, none at all. Unless, of course, lobbyists for smaller tobacco companies, the losers in the agreement, dumped enough of the green stuff in Jefferson City to insure that the lawmakers assigned it a lesser priority than curtailing non-existent voter fraud or punishing Planned Parenthood for malfeasance that never happened.

These are the big money-wasters from the last session that I know about. There may be more, but if you tally up the cost of these four items, the total cost to Missouri taxpayers comes to something in the vicinity of $1.7 billion for one year – and some have financial implications that last for several years. That’s an awful lot for hard-pressed Missourians to pay when all that they’re getting for their money is an election year boost for Republican politicians so that they can make good on their implicit pledge to insure that those who have, get more.

Why do Missouri pols enable dishonest “baby parts” politics

30 Saturday Apr 2016

Posted by willykay in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

abortion, Fetal research, Marsha Blackburn, Planned Parenthood, Select Investigative Panel on Infant Lives

Maybe you’ve heard about the excesses and overt bias shown by the GOP-dominated House Select Panel that was convened to “investigate” accusations that Planned Parenthood sold researchers fetal tissue obtained from abortions – which would be illegal if the organization were attempting to profit from such sales. Not only were the accusations fully discredited long before the panel was convened, but the antics of its members, especially the Chair, Rep. Marsha Blackburn, have been so egregious that they have elicited a letter (pdf) of protest from 98 House members addressed to Blackburn and House Speaker Paul Ryan asking that the Panel be disbanded.

As a resident of Missouri, one of the  interesting aspects of this letter lies in the signature area. Take a look.  Unless I’m missing something, not one of Missouri’s House members, Democratic or Republican, signed the letter.

Such a failure on the part of Republicans is to be expected. Nevertheless, given the criminal aspect of the spurious accusations – which are especially serious since they are being used to influence policy and provide fodder for misleading political attacks – U.S. House Republicans from Missouri, Rep. Ann Wagner (R-2), Jason Smith (R-8), Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-3), Billy Long (R-7) , Sam Graves (R-6) and Vicky Hartzler (R-4),  should be held accountable for their partisans’ behavior.  If they won’t disavow the ugly political charade enacted by the panel, they deserve our public scorn at the very least.

But, of course, Republicans will be … Republicans. The failure of our Democrats is potentially much worse. For Democrats Lacy Clay Jr. (D-1)  and Emanuel Cleaver (D-5) not to sign the letter is inexcusable. You don’t have to be for or against abortion to stand  up for honest government or to oppose attacks on  legal scientific research that benefits all of us. At the very least, these congressmen ought to be concerned about the waste of taxpayer money that is involved in the panel’s gratuitous activities. Shouldn’t we ask them  why their names are missing? Was it because they didn’t get the letter in time? An oversight on the part of staff? Disagreement with the text of the letter? Or was it just plain old political fear? We’re paying for this travesty after all. We deserve to know.

Find below the text of the letter:

 We write to you as members of Congress who are deeply concerned with the way the Select Panel is conducting itself, specifically in its recent attempts to investigate how researchers acquire fetal tissue.

As you may know, after more than two months of reviewing the joint inquiry, a grand jury in Texas recently cleared Planned Parenthood of any wrongdoing. Instead, the grand jury indicted two of the anti-abortion activists from the Center for Medical Progress for felonies committed in the course of making hidden-camera videos. Despite continued and repeated affirmation  that Planned Parenthood broke no laws and did nothing wrong, the Select Investigative Panel has continued to endanger healthcare providers and patients with its extreme rhetoric claiming that Planned Parenthood is selling baby parts.

Equally concerning are the investigations into scientists doing research  that uses fetal tissue. We are particularly concerned by the recent reports that the select panel had issued 11 subpoenas to medical supply companies and laboratories that will seek the names of researchers, gradate students, laboratory technicians, and administrative personnel  involved with fetal tissue research. This misuse of subpoena power is clearly aimed at not only stopping the progress of crucial medical research, but personally intimidating the scientists who are engaged in the life-saving work.

As members of Congress who  understand the importance of medical research and on behalf of the millions of Americans who are waiting for the cures to Parkinson’s, Multiple Sclerosis, and the many other diseases awaiting a cure, we feel compelled to condemn these dangerous tactics. this body has spent more than enough taxpayer money doing the bidding of the National Republican Congressional  Committee. It is clear that this Panel serves no other purpose than to carry out politically-motivated attacks on Planned Parenthood and it  should be dissolved immediately.

GOP Planned Parenthood grandstanding will cost Missouri taxpayers

20 Wednesday Apr 2016

Posted by willykay in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

abortion, fiscal policy, Kurt Schaefer, Planned Parenthood

Republicans used to take credit for being fiscally responsible. In recent years, however, they’ve started to spend lots of taxpayer money on ideological gestures without getting much  of anything in return. The sad thing is that GOPers, along with everybody else, probably know that they’re wasting money, but they can’t resist the pander credits that they hope to gain.

The latest boondoggle could be  state Senator Kurt Schaefer’s (R-19) efforts to remove Planned Parenthood allocations from Medicaid federal funds. The pander credits he is trying to amass, as everyone agrees, are to be applied to his campaign for the office of attorney general:

… Schaefer leads a charge to punish Planned Parenthood for alleged traffic in human parts gleaned from aborted fetuses.  […] The issue of how Planned Parenthood handles fetal remains stems from a thoroughly discredited video shot under cover and heavily edited to show an agency official discussing a possible legal sale of fetal material to a person claiming to be a possible buyer. A later investigation by the Missouri attorney general’s office found no wrongdoing. Two activists involved in making the video are under indictment by a grand jury in Texas.
Schaefer is head of the Missouri Senate committee investigating Planned Parenthood, a role he apparently covets as part of his campaign [for the office of attorney general].

Apropos a subpoena issued to the CEO of the Missouri Planned Parenthood:

Ironically, it might not matter much from an election politics standpoint what Schaefer’s committee can learn from an appearance by the Planned Parenthood CEO. Merely having her under attack for several days will solidify the chairman’s bulldog bona fides.

Just to be clear, as Think Progress notes:

Planned Parenthood does not use federal funding to provide abortions — thanks to the Hyde amendment, taxpayer dollars have been illegal to use to provide abortion services for decades (except in very rare cases such as danger to the mother’s life, rape, or incest). Instead, federal funding, like that from Medicaid, goes to provide family planning services like birth control, STD testing, and cancer screenings for patients who normally wouldn’t have access to these services.

Missouri is not alone in efforts to gain right-wing brownie points by crippling Planned Parenthood. It is one of twenty-four states proposing to cut the agency’s funding from Medicaid in spite of background rumblings to the effect that such efforts are likely to face legal challenges. In an April 19 letter addressed to the Medicaid Director of each of the fifty states, the Director of the Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services raises the pitch  (pdf) of previous warnings:

Pursuant to § 431.51(b)(1)(i), states may establish provider standards or take action against Medicaid providers that affects beneficiary access to those providers only (1) based on reasons relating to the fitness of the provider to perform covered medical services or to appropriately bill for those services, and (2) with supporting evidence of the provider’s failure to meet the state’s reasonable provider standards. This is consistent with longstanding CMS policy that Medicaid beneficiaries are provided with competent care by qualified providers and have the same ability to choose among available providers as those with private coverage.
Providing the full range of women’s health services neither disqualifies a provider from participating in the Medicaid program, nor is the provision of such services inconsistent with the best interests of the beneficiary, and shall not be grounds for a state’s action against a provider in the Medicaid program.

Can you, like me, see losing lawsuits in the offing if Missouri goes ahead with efforts to cut funding to Planned Parenthood? And we all know who will pay to defend the meaningless showboating of Senator Schafer and his pals. I wonder if the majority of Missourians, apart from anti-abortion hysterics, really want to go out-of-pocket to finance Kurt Schaefer’s political ambitions?  Especially when there are so many things the state needs -decent roads and schools, for example – that Schaefer and his pals tell us we cannot afford?

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • Just one more sign that we’re all living in an empire in rapid decline
  • How it started…
  • Somebody should probably tell him
  • Thank you, Joe Biden (D)!
  • Early this morning

Recent Comments

Uh, in case you were… on Some right wingnuts with money…
Winning at losing… on Passing the gas – Donald…
TACO Tuesday | Show… on TACO or Mushrooms?
TACO Tuesday | Show… on So much winning
So much winning | Sh… on Passing the gas – Donald…

Archives

  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,046,982 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...