• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Tag Archives: campaign signs

There will be no “persuadable” voters in 2020, there will only be turnout

18 Saturday Apr 2020

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

campaign signs, Donald Trump, Jackson County, Joe Biden, Johnson County, president, yard signs

“Make America Great Again” – in Russian.

This morning in western Johnson County:

Along U.S, 50 Highway in western Johnson County, Missouri.

The irony escapes them. All $130,000.00 of it.

Jackson County, Missouri COVID-19 statistics:

The price of gross incompetence.

Cheerleading that incompetence this morning in eastern Jackson County:

At a business establishment along U.S. 50 Highway in eastern Jackson County, Missouri.

Don’t waste your time or your breath.

Heating up the neighborhood

12 Friday Oct 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

2012, campaign signs, missouri

In west central Missouri:

That’s just about everybody.

Once a partisan plants a few signs the nearby partisans from the other side tend to jump in to the act.  

Signs: Party, what party?

14 Saturday Jul 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

campaign signs, missouri

The August primary is near.

As we’ve noted before, it’s a rarity these days to come across a campaign sign with a candidate’s party affiliation printed on it. Here are two exceptions, spotted in Johnson County in west central Missouri:

Scott Rupp (left) is one of several republican party candidates for Secretary of State in the August primary.

Gary Grigsby is one of two Democratic Party candidates in the 51st Legislative District

(the sign is from a previous campaign – the numbering has changed due to redistricting).

What in….?

No party affiliation indicated. Samantha Hill and Heather Myers-Reynolds are both republican candidates

for Johnson County Treasurer in the August primary.

No party affiliation indicated. Candidates for Johnson County Sheriff in the August primary.

Brian Hobbs? We have no idea. Chuck Heiss is the incumbent and a republican.

No party affiliation indicated. Bill Stouffer is a republican candidate for Secretary of State.

Bill Collins is a republican candidate in the 17th Circuit, Division 1 and does not have a primary opponent.

The campaign consultant industrial complex conventional wisdom tells candidates to not put their party affiliation on their signs. If the republican brand is supposedly so strong, why would that matter? Just asking.

Previously:

Signs: almost every republican appears to have received the memo… (July 5, 2012)

Signs: sometimes you feel like a nut, sometimes you don’t really have a choice (June 20, 2012)

Signs, signs, everywhere signs… (2012) – part 3 (June 13, 2012)

Signs, signs, everywhere signs… (2012) – part 2 (June 12, 2012)

Signs, signs, everywhere signs… (2012) (June 6, 2012)

Cognitive Dissonance…

25 Monday Oct 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

campaign signs, missouri

…from different quarters.

Missouri is an interesting place when it comes to politics on the ground. It’s home to Libertarians, tilting at windmills, with no political infrastructure to speak of:

And then there are the right wingnut voters willing to carry water for the top one percent in exchange for a little rhetorical lip service when it comes to few wedge issues:

Where was this sign from January 2001 to January 2009? Just asking. * IOKIYAR

* it’s okay if you’re a republican.

Pro life? Does that mean you’re against war?

Reward hard work? So, what about people who inherit money?

Fair tax? So, you’re against regressive sales taxes?

No debt? Um, what happened to the national debt when George W. Bush was in office? And where were you? Just asking.

Here’s a hint:

Common sense? Nope. It’s either cognitive dissonance or stupidity, take your pick.

Hubbard's signs: Stolen or removed with permission?

02 Saturday Aug 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 9 Comments

Tags

campaign signs, Jim Roos, missouri, Rodney Hubbard

On Tuesday, I wrote about the campaign sign brouhaha going on between Rodney Hubbard and Jim Roos. Roos (pictured at left) says he’s been–with the permission of property owners–taking down Hubbard signs that were put up without the permission of those owners. Hubbard says Roos has been stealing the signs.

In the comments, ashriver suggested I contact the property owners to determine the truth of the matter. That sounded like a decent idea to me, so I drove downtown and got a list of the properties in question from Jim Roos. Unfortunately, the main thing I learned is that property owners and managers do not want to be in the middle of a political argument. They run businesses, and they don’t want anybody mad at them.

I only got two owner/managers to talk to me, and in each case basically got confirmation of Roos’s account. But both were quick to request that I not use their name or the address of their business.

In one case, for example, Roos’s notes indicated that he saw a 4′ X 6′ Hubbard sign in front of a gas station, stopped to ask if it had been put there with permission and if not, whether he could come back that evening and take it down. The manager told him that it was the third such unauthorized sign and that he (the manager) wasn’t going to wait until evening, whereupon the manager went outside and took it down himself.

When I spoke to the manager, he told me that he drove up to the gas station, saw the sign, planned to take it down immediately, but went inside first, where he found Roos, who had just walked in and was talking to the clerk. When Roos asked if he could come back that evening and take down the sign, the manager told me that he didn’t want to wait, that he went outside and took the sign down and threw it in the dumpster. He said Roos came back that evening with his truck and took the sign away.

I asked the manager if he had taken down two previous signs, and he said he couldn’t remember. He manages more than one place and has taken down other signs.

What this man stressed to me is that he doesn’t even know whether Rodney Hubbard is a Democrat or a Republican. He has no opinion on Hubbard. The only opinion he does have is that he doesn’t want to offend any of his customers with political signs. He said: “I would have taken the sign down anyway. I don’t want to be on a side. I want to be neutral and live peaceably.”

And he asked me not to give his name or the address of the station.

That gentleman was the most forthcoming of those I called. One other man basically confirmed that signs had been put up without permission and that Roos removed one with his permission. But he was reluctant to tell me even that much. Of the other five or six calls I made, either the owner wasn’t on the premises and wouldn’t be available within the next few hours or the owner preferred not to discuss it. Several of them were obviously foreign born so that communication was not easy and they seemed suspicious of a stranger asking questions.

But no one mentioned Roos stealing a sign.

Still, I gotta say, some reporter I’d make. I don’t have the patience for it. And I don’t have any names or addresses to offer either, just my unsubstantiated word–for whatever that’s worth.

Hubbard: Rodney's been wronged!

29 Tuesday Jul 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 11 Comments

Tags

campaign signs, Jim Roos, missouri, Rodney Hubbard

Rodney Hubbard says Jim Roos is a slumlord. That’s some loaded language. The Post-Dispatch describes Roos this way: “A seminary school graduate, Roos  founded Sanctuary in the Ordinary, a “housing ministry” that owns rental units throughout the city.”

This attack on Roos was brought on by the fact that he has been taking down some of Hubbard’s campaign signs–and making no bones about it. Rodney is pretty ticked off. His press release reads:

Jim Roos, a known slumlord and discredited activist has stolen and defaced a number of the campaign’s signs and advertisements.  This criminal conduct will not be tolerated and has been referred to the City’s Board of Elections.

If Roos has been stealing Hubbard’s signs, then indeed Roos should be ashamed of himself. Except, Roos wouldn’t call it “stealing”.

More on that idea shortly, but first the backstory: the two men are at odds over the eminent domain issue. Rodney is getting a lot of money from Paul McKee, a developer who wants to use eminent domain to complete the property packages he has accumulated in North St. Louis City. Roos opposes such taking of property.

In fact he opposes it so much that he has worked his fanny off this last year or more heading up a campaign to collect signatures for two petition initiatives he expects to get on the ballot this fall reining in eminent domain abuse. Roos has even gone so far as to have a huge mural painted on the side of one of his buildings, and that sign has been a bone of contention between himself and the city administration–thus Rodney’s use of the term “discredited activist”.

But enough about the mural and back to the campaign signs. Here’s Roos’s explanation:

Besides eminent domain abuse, one could charge Hubbard with “sign abuse”. His campaign, routinely, without permission, put up monster 4’x8′ signs in front of medium size food shops and service stations.  Many of these owners are foreign born.  They were confused and intimidated by the signs.  Some American Born owners just took them down or stopped the installers.  Other owners gave me permission to remove the signs.  I “recycled” three Hubbard signs to make a single large protest sign for stopping Hubbard and stopping E/D abuse and put it on our warehouse at 2750 Lafayette.

I guess the only way I could judge the truth of Roos’s claim for sure would be to take him up on his offer of talking to the owners and managers who had Hubbard signs put up on their property without permission. I have to admit I haven’t done that: it’s a trek from North St. Louis County to Bohemian Hill, and I’m busy.

I have an opinion about whether Roos is telling the truth or not, but I haven’t collected proof. Take that for what it’s worth.

The most legal fun you can have in a campaign…

21 Monday Jul 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

campaign signs

…is putting up large signs.

Hearing protection when you’re driving the posts is a good idea, too.

This morning I accompanied a sign crew for Mike Wagner, the Democratic candidate for judge in the 17th Judicial Circuit (Cass and Johnson Counties), as they set up 4 x 6 signs in Johnson County. For some reason signs tend to have to go up on one of the hottest days of the summer. Today was no exception to that rule.

Essential tools for the task include a lot of volunteers (the more the merrier), post drivers, six foot steel posts, cable ties, screw drivers, cutting tools, weed whackers, and of course, the signs. You need a truck to transport the fixin’s and your volunteers. And since it’s going to be a long hot day, you need to bring a lot of water.

A weed whacker is essential for clearing the line of sight.

Signs cannot go in a highway right of way. Getting the permission of the owner to place a sign on their property is an essential part of the preparation. In some municipalities there are restrictions which dictate the time frame when signs can go up, how long the can stay up, and when they need to come down. This can vary from town to town within a county.

Cable ties (also referred to as “zip ties”) are a vast improvement over the old school technique of wire and pliers.

A screw driver is used to punch holes in the plastic sign. The cable ties are then run through the holes and around the steel posts.

Setting posts in an Alfalfa field (with the permission of the property owner) out of the right of way at a highway junction.

Steel posts (as extensions) can be connected using heavy wire or, in this case, exhaust pipe brackets.

A dozen signs and six hours later, a portion of the candidate’s signs are up.

Recent Posts

  • Johnson County Democrats – Knob Noster Fair Parade – May 28, 2026
  • Campaign Finance: once again, so they get it
  • Disrespect
  • “Ooh, ooh! Pick me! Pick me!”
  • Campaign Finance: Oxymoron

Recent Comments

Uh, in case you were… on Some right wingnuts with money…
Winning at losing… on Passing the gas – Donald…
TACO Tuesday | Show… on TACO or Mushrooms?
TACO Tuesday | Show… on So much winning
So much winning | Sh… on Passing the gas – Donald…

Archives

  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,049,215 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...