Clarence Thomas, corruption, Eric Schmitt, Ethics, Fascist pig, gaslighting, grifting, missouri, social media, U.S. Senate
No, no, he doesn’t.
This is going to become Eric Schmitt’s (r) favorite whine:
Eric Schmitt @Eric_Schmitt
The most recent Democrat campaign against Justice Thomas is about trying to intimidate him and the Supreme Court’s originalist majority, not ethics.
1:15 PM · May 5, 2023
Some of the responses:
Okay so why is the complaints being raised about ethics then?
This is a parody account, right?
Why is it that the lower courts follow and abide by ethical standards but our highest does not? How can we trust him to interpret the constitution when he has been filling out forms incorrectly for years? Why aren’t you pushing for ethical standards?
Not even you believe that, #Schmitthead.
What would you know about ethics?
Yeah, sure, because billionaires always buy everyone’s mother’s house, remodel the house, and let mom still live there rent free (May 1, 2023)
Josh Hawley(r) has serious concerns about the financial dealings of Clarence Thom…oh, wait (May 4, 2023)
Lucinda Baker said:
Eric Schmitt, if you spent half as much time representing your constituents as you do on self promotion and aggrandizement, your legacy might someday be worthy of respect.
Pingback: Fishing or orchestral? | Show Me Progress
Pingback: As opposed to being a wholly owned subsidiary | Show Me Progress
V J Neighbors said:
They can label themselves “originalists” and deign that the only true intent but, if that were so, why did Constitution framers build in processes to add AMENDMENTS? Because they knew it was not a “one and done” document.