• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Monthly Archives: February 2012

The right wingnut cult of the victim continues…

11 Saturday Feb 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

corporate personhood, irony impairment, Koch

Corporations can now have their feelings hurt. We await Supreme Court confirmation.

A press release:

Statement from Koch Companies Public Sector, LLC in Response to Obama Campaign Remarks

WICHITA, Kan., Feb. 10, 2012 PRNewswire — We will exercise our First Amendment rights and not be intimidated or silenced by the President’s aides and his allies who criticize private citizens that disagree with the President’s policies.

The Obama campaign’s decision to embrace Super PACs is similar to the President’s hypocrisy in 2008 when he broke his promise to use public campaign financing, and became the first major party presidential candidate in history to turn down public financing in a general election. It is worth noting that President Obama outraised and outspent his opponent by hundreds of millions of dollars in the 2008 Presidential campaign, relying in large part on the same corporate executive funding sources whose productivity, business practices, and profitability he pretends to denounce.

Apparently, the President and his allies do not want to lose that perceived fundraising advantage during the 2012 Presidential campaign, and are trying to intimidate into silence those who may disagree with them and who may decide to support other candidates.

— Philip Ellender, president and COO

Government and Public Affairs

Koch Companies Public Sector, LLC

SOURCE Koch Companies Public Sector, LLC

Apparently they don’t have anyone on their payroll who knows how to start up a blog. Even with all that money.

It’s not that we’re volunteering.

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): keep on spinning

11 Saturday Feb 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

2012, 4th Congressional District, missouri, Teresa Hensley, Vicky Hartzler

File this one under “What color is the sky in their world?”:

Posted on Fri, Feb. 10, 2012 11:42 PM

Rep. Vicki Hartzler, tea party face similar challenges

By DAVID GOLDSTEIN

The Star’s Washington correspondent

….Hartzler blamed the news media.

“I think people are only being told one side of the story,” she said. “I’ve gone to town halls and people say, ‘Why don’t you pass a jobs bill?’ We (House Republicans) passed 30….”

….In an interview with the American Family Association, a Christian group, at the start of her term, Hartzler was more expansive:

“The reality is that the good people of this country who love it, who love God, who love each other, who are concerned about the pro-abortion, pro-homosexual agenda of the current administration, they were the ones that got down on their knees and started praying for this country after the ’08 election.”

That’s interesting spin.

The “jobs” part at town halls? Not exactly:

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): town hall in Warrensburg, part 1 (August 11, 2011)

Representative Vicky Hartzler (r) at the Community Center in Warrensburg, Missouri on August 10, 2011.

….Voice: It’s not uncertainty about the economy, it’s a lack of con [crosstalk], consumer demand. [crosstalk] [voice: “Yeah.”][applause][voice: “Yeah, all right.”]

Voice: Consumer demand is lacking because people do not have jobs. They don’t have the money to [crosstalk]…

Voice: People don’t have money.

Representative Hartzler: Okay, let me [crosstalk]…

Voice: You all were supposed to [inaudible] [crosstalk]on jobs when you came in office. [voice: “Yeah.”]

Representative Hartzler: Wait, wait, wait [crosstalk] just a minute.

Voice: Jobs!

Voice: That’s what you said.

Voice: You said you were jobs, you didn’t [crosstalk] say anything about fighting the President.

Representative Hartzler: All right [crosstalk]. Listen, listen [crosstalk]…

Voice: When, when you ran your campaign [crosstalk] the only thing we heard was jobs, jobs, jobs [crosttalk], jobs, jobs. [crosstalk] You get into office and the only thing we hear out of you now is abortion [inaudible].

Voice: We were gonna fix it, that’s what you said.

Voice: You said you were a teabagger and that you were gonna fight the President. Why?

Voice: Quiet down and listen.

Voice: [crosstalk] …farm subsidies.

Representative Hartzler: Uh, we are gonna have [crosstalk][inaudible] conversation and then there’ll be time for any of the comments. But I’m gonna say this, we’re gonna have a respectful town hall here [crosstalk] [voice: “You don’t like (inaudible)”] and we’re gonna listen. I want you to have lis, respect everybody. Listen. And then I’m gonna listen to you. [voice: “You’re not doing a very good job”] And that’s the way this town hall’s gonna be run. If you don’t feel comfortable with that you’re welcome to not participate. But I want to hear your ideas and [crosstalk]… [multiple voices, some inaudible]

Voice: Well then good, then let’s begin. [crosstalk] Then let’s begin, let’s begin.

Voice: Let’s let her talk first.

Voice: [crosstalk]…our ideas.

Voice: Who owns our debt? [crosstalk]

Representative Hartzler: We have forty-seven percent [crosstalk] of our foreign debt [crosstalk] is caused, held by the [inaudible]. Okay.

Voice: She’s our representative in Congress [crosstalk] isn’t she?

Voice: And she’ll let you talk in a minute.

Representative Hartzler: Shh. All right….

Teh gay and abortion stuff? Yep.

From the Star article:

….Republican State Sen. Chris Molendorp, who knows both Hensley and Hartzler, said the congresswoman is “kind of a hometown hero” and will be tough to beat. “She is really hitting her stride….”

Stride? More spin.

Oh, and by the way, Chris Molendorp (r) is a state representative, not a state senator.

Roy Blunt tries to pull a fast one

11 Saturday Feb 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

ACA, Affordable Care Act, Catholic Bishops, contraception, missouri, Roy Blunt, Shock Doctrine

Remember Naomi Klein and her book The Shock Doctrine, which details the way the corporatocracy uses big upheavals to usher in unrelated, often brutal “reforms” that benefit the statist-corporatist alliance? I’ve just read how our own corporatist GOP Senator Roy Blunt is trying to pull a similar fast one on a smaller scale – a little  bit of unrelated destruction in the wake of a baby quake – although capable of very nasty, large-scale consequences.

Specifically, Blunt is trying to take advantage of the Bishops’ temper tantrums about contraception coverage under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and their whining about “freedom of religion” to do his pals in the Insurance Industry a solid. According to Think Progress‘ Igor Volsky, Blunt is proposing an amendment to the ACA that would allow insurers, employers, and every other Tom, Dick and Harry to gut coverage for just about anything that strikes their wandering fancy:

Under the measure, an insurer or an employer would be able to claim a moral or religious objection to covering HIV/AIDS screenings, Type 2 Diabetes treatments, cancer tests or anything else they deem inappropriate or the result of an “unhealthy” or “immoral” lifestyle. Similarly, a health plan could refuse to cover mental health care on the grounds that the plan believes that psychiatric problems should be treated with prayer.

Individuals too can opt out of coverage if it is contrary to their religious or moral beliefs, radically undermining “the basic principle of insurance, which involves pooling the risks for all possible medical needs of all enrollees.” As the National Women’s Law Center explains, Blunt’s language is vague enough that “insurers may be able to sell plans that do not cover services required by the new health care law to an entire market because one individual objects, so all consumers in a market lose their right to coverage of the full range of critical health services.” As a result, a man “purchasing an insurance plan offered to women and men could object to maternity coverage, so the plan would not have to cover it, even though such coverage is required as part of the essential health benefits.

Do any of you remember when Blunt was the House’s (totally inept) point person in the fight against the ACA? If so, you remember his four-page, short-on-details alternative plan and how the industry just loved it.  You also probably remember how he wallowed in insurance industry dollars. Nor, I suspect, will you be surprised to learn that he’s still at it, wallowing in insurance industry dough, I mean. Trashing the ACA too, of course.

(See also DailyKos‘ coverage.)

SJR 49: jumping on the bandwagon at the end of a one block parade

11 Saturday Feb 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

abortion, contraception, General Assembly, health care reform, missouri, PPP, SJR 49

Previously:

Funding contraception and freedom of conscience: Another manufactured controversy (February 8, 2012)

A win for women, and for Obama (February 10, 2012)

Shell game (February 10, 2012)

It’s all in the timing – a bill by Senator Scott Rupp (r) was introduced on Tuesday, February 7th:

SJR 49 Prohibits laws interfering with religious beliefs

Sponsor: Rupp

LR Number: 5676S.02I Fiscal Note not available

Committee: General Laws

Last Action: 2/9/2012 – Second Read and Referred S General Laws Committee Journal Page: S236

Title: Calendar Position:

Effective Date: Upon voter approval

Current Bill Summary

SJR 49 – Upon voter approval, this constitutional amendment provides that no law, regulation or rule shall compel, directly or indirectly, any person, employer, health care provider, or entity to provide coverage for any of the following medical services, if such medical services are contrary to the moral, ethical or religious beliefs or tenets of such person, employer, health care provider, or entity:

(1) Abortion;

(2) Contraceptives, including but not limited to all contraceptives approved by the federal Food and Drug Administration, emergency contraceptives;

(3) Abortion-inducing drugs; and

(4) Sterilization procedures.

Uh, yep.

@BuzzFeedBen Ben Smith

So did the Bishops just invite the GOP out onto a limb with them, then saw it off? 6 hours ago

This has been another edition of simple answers to simple questions.

From Public Policy Polling (PPP):

February 10, 2012

Our polling on the birth control issue

We’ve had a lot of people asking us this week if we’ve done any polling about the birth control issue.  We did a national survey for Planned Parenthood last weekend. Here are the key things we found [pdf]:

-56% of voters generally support the birth control benefit, while 37% are opposed. Independents strongly favor it, 55/36, and a lot more Republicans (36%) support it than Democrats (20%) oppose it. Women are for it by a 63/29 margin.

-Only 39% of voters support an exemption for Catholic hospitals and universities from providing the benefit, while 57% are opposed to one.

– There is a major disconnect between the leadership of the Catholic Church and rank and file Catholic voters on this issue. We did an over sample of almost 400 Catholics and found that they support the benefit overall, 53-44, and oppose an exception for Catholic hospitals and universities, 53-45. The Bishops really are not speaking for Catholics as a whole on this issue.

-Republican agitating on this issue could cause themselves trouble at the polls this year. 40% of voters say Mitt Romney’s stance makes them less likely to vote for him, while only 23% consider it a positive.  With the Catholic oversample it’s 46% less likely and 28% more likely. And Congressional Republicans are imperiling themselves as well. 58% of voters oppose them trying to take the benefit away, while only 33% are supportive.

Republicans will win this fall if they can convince voters that the economy stinks and it’s Barack Obama’s fault and putting them in power will fix the problem. If they want to make it about social issues and making it easy and affordable for women to access birth control, Democrats win.

They can’t help themselves, can they?

Shell game

11 Saturday Feb 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

contraception, health care reform

Digby sums it all up in three sentences:

….How changing the paperwork trail isn’t “cooperating with evil” and will salve the institution’s “conscience” is anyone’s guess. Apparently, God is mostly concerned about keeping up appearances. Who knew?…

We are not worthy.

Here's hoping you paid that last public relations invoice

11 Saturday Feb 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

education.KKK, missouri, Rex Sinquefield

Previously: Rex Sinquefield on the origins of the public school system (February 10, 2012)

A press release from the Missouri Association of School Administrators:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Feb. 10, 2012

[….]

Sinquefield Comment Offensive to Public Schools

Eric Chruchwell, President of the Missouri Association of School Administrators and Superintendent of the Palmyra R-I School District has characterized comments made by billionaire Rex Sinquefield on Thursday night as “offensive to every student, parent, employee, teacher, administrator, and school board member in a public school.”

In a videotape of a meeting at Lindenwood University Thursday night, Sinquefield can be clearly heard repeating a story he had read, “…a long time ago, decades ago, the Ku Klux Klan got together and said, ‘how can we really hurt the African American children permanently? How can we ruin their lives? And what they designed was the public school system….’ ” Video of the offensive comment was captured and posted to YouTube. It is available at this internet address:  http://youtu.be/-vSpyB6s3cE .

“Mr. Sinquefield is the largest political contributor in the state and has donated millions of dollars to politicians and campaigns to advance his personal agenda.  Whether they have benefited from these contributions or not, it is time for politicians to stand up for public school employees and to denounce this racist comment,” Churchwell said.  

Missouri schools face real challenges with shrinking budgets and they are serving more children in poverty than ever before. Now is the time for serious and thoughtful solutions that support our public schools, not degrade them. Sinquefield owes an apology to the parents, children, and workers who make our schools an environment where every child can realize his/her potential.

###

From members of the General Assembly:

Statement from State Representative Margo McNeil regarding Rex Sinquefield KKK comments:

   Thursday night Mr. Rex Sinquefield made comments that called the  public school system a conspiracy of the Ku Klux Klan.

   I’m flabbergasted by Mr. Sinquefield’s comments that are offensive and wrong. Sinquefield’s comments demonstrate his open hostility towards public education and his willingness to rewrite history and play loose with the facts. This disregard for the truth applies to other issues he promotes, like his radical Everything Tax initiative. Experts agree that the Tax Everything proposals would devastate state and local budgets and cripple funding for our public schools. He should apologize for his outrageous statement and abandon efforts to destroy public education in Missouri.

###

Representative Margo McNeil, a Democrat, represents parts of Hazelwood, Florissant and Bridgeton (District 78) in the Missouri  House of Representatives.

Prior to her legislative duties, Rep. McNeil worked for 22 years as an art teacher with the Ferguson Florissant School District.

###

Statement from State Representative Chris Carter regarding Rex Sinquefield KKK comments:

   I’m floored by Mr. Sinquefield’s comments — they’re as offensive as they are wrong. He must explain himself and apologize immediately.

   I’m doubly concerned that Sinquefield’s open hostility towards public education is a part of why he’s pushing so hard for his radical Everything Tax.  Bipartisan budget experts agree that his plan to raise taxes on working families will devastate the state budget, harming our local schools and limiting our communities’ ability to invest in the future.

###

Pass the freakin’ popcorn.

A win for women, and for Obama

10 Friday Feb 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

By @BGinKC

Let me start with a confession…my children were educated in Catholic schools (we moved every couple of years, and Catholic schools had a consistent canon) and now, post-Air Force, my husband is a teacher in a Cristo Rey Catholic high school. One of the things that the church does well is education. A vast majority of the literate people in the world were taught to read by the Catholic church. I rail at the church, and especially the Bishops, on a regular basis, but I keep in mind that, like most everything else, the church is not intrinsicly evil, but like any large organization has a percentage of people who can accurately be described as evil.

When I was growing up, a half-breed, multi-cultural Brat searching for her own identity, some of my heroes were Catholic clergy of the Liberation Theology bent, like Oscar Romero and his colleagues in Central America. Remember the nun who flashed the peace sign at the beginning of Woodstock? I had a poster of her on my bedroom wall. I know that the vast majority of Priests have never molested a child, and while I’m on the subject, some of my favorite memories of my children’s childhoods revolve around one of the parishes where they attended school, especially watching Notre Dame football at the rectory and drinking Harp with Father O’Connor, while we both said hateful things about fellow parishoner Mark Gietzen.

That bond was formed the day my daughter wore her uniform to school on free-dress day. I caught a glimpse of her in the back seat as she was buckling up and asked her why she was wearing her uniform on free-dress day. She was all of nine years old, and she replied matter-of-factly that “Anna’s Daddy won’t let her wear regular clothes to school and the other kids tease her. I thought maybe if I wore mine today, they would be nicer to her.” (For the record, that moment, right there, made every minute of 29-years-and-counting of parenting worth everything it has or ever will cost — emotionally, physically, financially and in lost sleep.) It was cold and grey that morning, and Father O’Connor was standing outside in the drizzle smiling and greeting the children as they entered through the gym and I had to park and run inside because one of the kids left something in the car. He mentioned Chev’s uniform and I told him what she had said that morning. He hugged me and said in his Irish brogue “Ah, Mrs. Booth, would that all our parents be raising children like yours.” By now the bell had rung and even the stragglers were in their classrooms. He offered me a cup of coffee, I accepted and we went across the street to the rectory for a strong cuppa, a shot of Jameson in the second one, and an hour or so of totally trashing that peckerhead Gietzen.

I admit to watching, dumbfounded, as contraception became, in the immortal words of the Vice President, “a big fucking deal” over the last week or so.  (My exact thought was…Birth control? Seriously???)

I mean, the provision was there all along. The Bishops had a chance to raise holy hell about it during the fight over healthcare. You know, like they did the non-existent free-abortions-for-all clause that they not only conjured up, but defeated, two years ago, but they didn’t mention it then. Either they were “putting it in their purse and saving it for later,” or, more likely, they were just desperate for a whipping boy now.

And of course, as I watched this fight unfold, I heard the usual voices to my left mewling and whining about “imminent cave-ins” and being “sold out by Obama…again” but honestly, I just ignored them. (Yes, yes, at my peril, I know, but god-damn, they’re more annoying than chiggers.)

Ditto the Bishops and their Roman Chorus. I really don’t give one hair on a rat’s furry ass what 271 old, mostly white men who aren’t supposed to be having sex anyway have to say about birth control, and neither do any of my Catholic friends. We all know that the old joke is funny cuz it’s true: “If men got knocked up, abortions would be a sacrament performed on the altars of the Holy Mother Church.” My husband and I did talk briefly about it, but I had a busy week, and just left it up to Obama, telling him “Hey, personally, I don’t feel like he’s failed me yet, so I’m curious to see what he’s up to here.”

What he’s was up to, it looks to me like, was positioning his pieces to call “checkmate” in one of those games of eleventh dimensional chess that I am starting to believe might actually exist.

He must have been laughing his ass off when the Bishops and their GOP allies picked this fight…but they sort-of had to. The Bishops needed to pre-emptively deflect attention from the fact that the official church doctrine falls more in line with the leftist populism of the Occupy movement than the right wing politicians they reflexively support, based on just one issue that trumps all others, even combined.

The GOP that curries the favor of the religious right, meantime, was eager to deflect attention from the fact that the economy is getting better in spite of their fiercest attempts at obstruction, proving nothing so much as that they are as inept at sabotage as they are at governing.

So they went there. As foolish and as reflexive as it was, they went there. Some pro-choice republicans were aghast, and pleaded with the leadership not to, but they charged ahead, like a two-ton bull, right through the doors of the china shop. And Barack Obama smiled and stood aside, holding them open.

Coming on the heels of the Planned Parenthood/Komen fiasco, the dual backlash directed at those who have, for two solid years, been declaring war on women, was palpable, and I think Obama handled it just about right. When I saw the Politico headline this morning proclaiming him “boxed in” I scoffed. “Bullshit,” I thought. “They’re out on a limb and he’s behind them with a saw.”

The pill was the largest social science experiment ever undertaken, and like any research project, there are those who want to scrap it — and as per usual, those who want to scrap it don’t want to scrap it because it’s harmful. Not if they’re honest. They want to scrap it because it challenges or debunks their own personal belief system, and so, like MayElla Ewell, they have to put it away from them, at any cost.

I have always found the stance of being anti-abortion and anti-contraceptive-use head-shaking in the amount of sheer and utter stupidity that goes into that position, but then, nothing defies logic quite so viciously as dogma, does it?

Those liberally-biased facts — and the polls — are on the side of the President and those who favor coverage. The Guttmacher Institute has been meticulous in research about family planning and birth control, and all of their research points not only to overwhelming public support for birth control coverage, but to additional, overlooked benefits of oral contraception. And trust me when I tell you, it was not lost on Catholic women, most of whom use artificial birth control, that they were being spoken for and not consulted, and for many of them (they aren’t all mindless drones, believe it or not) it will affect how they vote.

I’ve had conversations with a couple of my Catholic friends and family about it today, and one of them said something I agree with. “Screw the Bishops. They only speak for the Bishops. If you want to know what actual Catholics think, find out what Sister Carol thinks. I can’t speak for anyone else, but she’s the only one who spe
aks for me.”

So I looked up what Sister Carol, the dynamo-in-a-wimple that heads up the Catholic Hospitals Association, had to say about today’s compromise.

Sister Carol Keehan, head of the Catholic Health Organization, said the compromise “has responded to the issues we identified that needed to be fixed.”

Keehan said the resolution “protects the religious liberty and conscience rights of Catholic institutions.”

And Planned Parenthood Federation of America said the approach “does not compromise a woman’s ability to access these critical birth control benefits.”

Cue the cries from the Tridentine hair-shirt wearers that Sister Carol has “sold out her faith” and even that she “needs to learn her place” — they will be singing the same off-key tune they sang when she supported healthcare reform two years ago, going against the Bishops that time, too. Now, like then, she was right and they were wrong. And rank-and-file Catholics know it.

Obama wasn’t boxed in. Not at all. But now the Bishops are. So far, they have been silent after thunderously declaring that nothing short of total repeal of the mandate would suit them. And as they lost the healthcare reform battle, they are going to lose this one, too. Because they are wrong and their time is past. And by their silence, I think they are telling us all that they realize they’ve been had.

Rex Sinquefield on the origins of the public school system

10 Friday Feb 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

education, KKK, missouri, Missouri NEA, Rex Sinquefield

Rex Sinquefield spoke at Lindenwood University on Thursday evening. He addressed his tax proposal, among other things, including his view of tenure, and then, at 2:42 in the video (via Progress Missouri):

Rex Sinquefield ($): ….You know what, there was a column written and, I hope I don’t offend anyone. It was a published column by a man named Ralph Voss who was a former judge in Missouri. He now owns and writes for a newspaper in Central Missouri called the Unterrified Democrat, what a name, and it’s in Osage County, Missouri. And he starts off, and something like this, he said a long time ago, decades ago, the Ku Klux Klan got together and said, how can we really hurt the African American children, permanently, how can we ruin their lives? And what they designed was the public school system [audience laughter]

Question: When was the last time you were in a public school and talked to a public school teacher?

Rex Sinquefield ($): Uh, I was in the Innovative Concept Academy just recently in St. Louis and got tours of [crosstalk][voice: “Public school.”]…

Question: That’s not a public school.

Rex Sinquefield ($): Yes it is. It’s an independent public school funded by the St. Louis, uh, public school system. I haven’t been in, maybe I’ve been in [inaudible]

There are a lot of public school systems across Missouri and America.

The St. Louis Innovative Concept Academy

[….]

School Information

With cooperation from the St. Louis Public School District, Juvenile Court Judge Jimmie Edwards has opened a new school to specifically address the needs of troubled students. This concept school will be based at Blewett Middle, which was slated to be closed in June of 2009 as part of the district’s reorganization plan.

While the school district will provide teachers, transportation and building maintenance, the Juvenile Court will provide supervision, support services and will line up community partners. MERS Goodwill has agreed to help with building management…

[….]

Community Partners

[….]

* Rex and Jeanne Sinquefield

[….]

Okay.

Thank you Davis, Citizens United and a few others for bestowing this political environment blessing upon us all.

Update:

Missouri NEA issued a press release:

Sinquefield Calls Public Education a Conspiracy of Ku Klux Klan

NEWS RELEASE

[….]

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Feb. 10, 2012

Teacher group demands an apology and calls on elected officials to condemn his remarks.



(Jefferson City, MO) – President Chris Guinther of the Missouri NEA, the largest teacher organization in the state representing over 35,000 teachers and education support professionals, condemned comments made by billionaire Rex Sinquefield who called public schools a conspiracy created by the Ku Klux Klan.

Sinquefield made the offensive comparison while discussing his unpopular “Everything-Tax” proposal at Lindenwood University in St. Charles late Thursday night. Specifically Sinquefield is quoted as saying:

“…a long time ago, decades ago, the Ku Klux Klan got together and said, ‘how can we really hurt the African American children permanently? How can we ruin their lives? And what they designed was the public school system….’ ”

President Chris Guinther, a teacher on leave from the Francis Howell School District, of the Missouri NEA condemned Sinquefield’s remarks and issued the following statement:

“To call the work of educators in public schools a KKK conspiracy shows how out of touch billionaire Rex Sinquefield truly is. This is a slap in the face of every educator who has worked tirelessly in a public school to improve the lives of Missouri’s children. Rex Sinquefield needs to explain himself and apologize to all students, parents and Missourians.”

Sinquefield, the largest political contributor in the state of Missouri, has donated millions of dollars to advance right-wing causes and elect politicians across the state.

Guinther continued her remarks by calling on those who have accepted Sinquefield’s support to make a choice,

“Every politician that has accepted contributions from Rex Sinquefield has a choice to make today – stand with an out-of-touch billionaire or stand with your public school kids, parents, educators and your communities.”

Video of the offensive comment was captured by Progress Missouri and was posted to YouTube. It is available here http://youtu.be/-vSpyB6s3cE with the KKK quote beginning at the 0:40 second mark.

The 35,000-member MNEA represents teachers, education support professionals, college faculty, retired teachers and students studying to be teachers in school districts and on college campuses throughout the state. It is the Missouri affiliate of the 3.2 million-member NEA.

###

McCaskill waffles on contraception

10 Friday Feb 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 5 Comments

Tags

Claire McCaskill, contraception, missouri

Yesterday I praised Claire McCaskill for standing up for the Obama Administration’s new rule on expanding access to contraception. Seems I spoke too soon and the timid little soul we’ve become accustomed to is back – and all it took was a couple days of bloviating religious bullies and a media far too willing to take their claims of persecution at face value:

Some other Catholic Democrats in the Senate, including John Kerry of Massachusetts and Claire McCaskill of Missouri, said they want the administration to adjust its rule.

“I’ve told the White House that I think they need to find a compromise that allows women to get access to birth control through their employer’s health-care coverage, but without pressing this issue of religious freedom to the extent that the current scenario does,” said McCaskill, a Missouri Democrat who also is running for re-election this year.

Excuse me! What issue of religious freedom can she possibly mean? The one where the Catholic Church is privileged over every other religion and gets to disadvantage their female employees in federally supported institutions? Where Catholic rights of conscience take precedence over public welfare? When it comes to rights and freedoms, why do women always get the short end of the stick – and how can even a minimally conscious female politician, who demonstrably knows better, roll over like this?

UPDATE:  Talk about a quick response – the President has announced an “accommodation” that knocks the legs out from under the anti-birth control cabal that’s been whining about “rights of conscience”  and “religious freedom” all week:

The gist is that women who work for religious institutions that object to offering birth control coverage will get contraception for free, directly from their insurers. The institutions won’t have to pay for it. The White House argues that this preserves both the “liberty” of those institutions and the core, inviolate principle that all women will have equal access to birth control, no matter where they work.

Insurers “will be required to reach out directly and offer them contraception coverage, free of charge,” one senior administration official says. “All women will still have acess [sic] to preventive care, and that includes contraceptive sevices [sic], no matter where they work.”

If I were McCaskill, I’d jump on this quick. Greg Sargent suggests that “the Obama team is betting that any further objections to this policy will unmask opponents primarily as hidebound foes of birth control at any costs.” In other words, they’re calling the Bishops’ bluff. Couple this development with a new poll which suggests that the Bishops’ effort to create a holy furor has largely failed to gain traction, and it’s clear that jumping on the anti-contraception bandwagon could be a big loser for unwary pols next fall.  

UPDATE 2: And, as per the St. Louis Beacon, McCaskill did jump in the right direction:

… This is a common-sense solution that protects the rights of women to access basic birth control, while respecting the rights of religious organizations. I’m glad this got worked out. If you’re someone who believes strongly in preventing abortions, like I do, then it only makes sense that we ensure women have equal and universal access to birth control, regardless of where they work.

Note:  Last update saved in garbled form and updated for clarity.

AG Chris Koster (D): Mortgage Settlement Agreement

10 Friday Feb 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Attorney General, Chris Koster, missouri, mortgage settlement

From the state web site of Attorney General Chris Koster (D):

Mortgage Settlement Agreement Information

Attorney General Chris Koster joined a landmark national mortgage settlement in order to bring more than $196 million to Missouri taxpayers and the state. The settlement with Bank of America, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, and Ally Financial is the largest civil settlement reached by the Attorneys General since the tobacco settlement.

The agreement settles state and federal investigations into whether the country’s five largest loan servicers routinely signed foreclosure-related documents outside the presence of a notary public and without knowing whether the facts they contained were correct. The settlement provides benefits to borrowers whose loans are owned by the settling banks as well as to many of the borrowers whose loans they service….

….Borrowers who are underwater in their homes and behind on their payments but could afford to make them at a reduced rate will receive an estimated $86.5 million in principal reductions and other borrower assistance programs….

….Borrowers whose houses are worth less than they owe will be able to refinance at today’s historically low interest rates….roughly $38 million of which will go to Missourians….

….Payments to borrowers who lost their homes to foreclosure with no requirement to prove financial harm and without having to release private claims against the servicers or the right to participate in the OCC review process. Missourians who have been foreclosed upon are eligible to receive roughly $2,000 each, up to about $31 million….

….The state of Missouri will receive over $40 million….

That last part just might go to partially fill a budget hole for higher education.

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • Medicare for All
  • Campaign Finance: wasted money
  • Mississippi Goddam
  • Oopsie!
  • Pete Hegseth (r): everyone knows

Recent Comments

Campaign Finance: wa… on Missouri republicans: an etern…
Campaign Finance: wa… on Campaign Finance: no quarter
Campaign Finance: wa… on Campaign Finance: Next
Mike’s Blog Round-Up… on Mark Alford (r): you can smell…
Mark Alford (r): you… on Mark Alford (r): manufacturing…

Archives

  • November 2026
  • October 2026
  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,102,839 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...