• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Tag Archives: 31st Senate District

Are you ready for some football? In Kansas.

23 Tuesday Dec 2025

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

31st Senate District, General Assembly, Kansas, missouri, Rick Brattin, social media, sportsball

Not a happy camper:

Rick Brattin (r) [2025 file photo].

Yesterday:

Senator Rick Brattin
District 31

[….]

For Immediate Release:
December 22, 2025

[….]

State Senator Rick Brattin Responds to
Kansas City Chiefs’ Decision to Leave Missouri

(Jefferson City, MO) – State Senator Rick Brattin issued the following statement today in response to the Kansas City Chiefs’ to relocate operations out of Missouri:

‘Missouri taxpayers have been loyal to he Kansas City Chiefs for decades. That loyalty was real, tangible, and costly. It was expressed in public dollars, public infrastructure, and a willingness time and again to support a franchise that benefitted enormously from being based in Missouri.

The chiefs’ decision to leave Missouri despite that history is deeply disappointing and profoundly disrespectful.

Missourians did not simply cheer from the stands. They helped build Arrowhead. They helped maintain it. They helped finance it. They created the environment that allowed the Chiefs to become one of the most successful and valuable franchises in professional sports. When the moment came to decide whether Missouri would once again step up, the state did exactly that.

The Missouri General Assembly passed legislation specifically designed to keep the Chiefs in Missouri. The legislation offered extraordinary financial incentives and long-term stability. It represented a clear signal to the Chiefs that Missouri values you and Missouri is willing to invest to keep you here. That was not an empty gesture. That was a good faith effort on behalf of Missouri taxpayers. The chiefs chose to walk away anyway.

That choice sends a clear message that decades of taxpayer support and loyalty can be discarded the moment a better offer appears across the state line. That is not partnership. That is exploitation. Missouri did not abandon the Chiefs. The Chiefs abandoned Missouri.

Because of that, I intend to introduce legislation that restores fairness and accountability. Under my proposal, any professional sports franchise that leaves a publicly funded stadium will be required to pay one percent of the total demolition cost of that stadium for every year the team used it.

if taxpayers were expected to help build and sustain these facilities, they should not be left holding the bill when a team decides to leave town. This is not about punishing success. It is about honoring responsibility. It is about making sure that taxpayer loyalty is not treated as disposable and that public investment is respected not taken for granted.

Missouri kept its word. Missouri acted in good faith. Missouri showed up when it mattered. If a franchise chooses to walk away from that loyalty, it should not walk away from the consequences. Missouri deserves better and I intend to make sure this never happens again.

###

Some of the responses:

Senator your proposed legislation sounds to me like an emotional response to a business decision. It also sounds like a good way to guarantee Missouri never sees another professional team. Missouri had a chance to step up and the voters of Jackson county said no and the Missouri legislature came up with an offer that wasn’t as good as the competition. You’re part of that legislature you should have worked harder to offer a more competitive deal. This is Missouri’s fault. All the Chiefs did was take advantage of a superior offer. I would suggest rather than making emotional statements you get to work trying to keep the Royals because you’re about to loose them also.

Not really a superior offer when Missouri can back up their offer. Kansas has several STAR bonds that are in default like Prairiefire, Topeka Heartland park & Schlitterban as well as Strataca which is projected to take decades to break even on its bonds… Kansas can’t afford it.. it’s all smoke

3 billion dollars directly to the pockets of a man already worth 24 billion is a scam, not business.

Why should taxpayers pay for all these mega rich sports teams. 99% of those who get stuck with the bill can’t afford to attend just one game.

As a resident of Cass county, I won’t see any of this money. However, for those who reside in Jackson county, I think a little coin in their collective back pockets couldn’t hurt. Business or not, there is something to be said about loyalty.

Your proposal is a short sighted retaliatory response to an understandable business decision. If we want any hope to attract future businesses, we better not penalize current businesses for leaving.
Good begets good. Bad begets bad.
Bottom line Missouri didn’t try to do anything until it was too little too late. For far too long, Jackson County citizens stood alone. They said “no more” about 18 months ago. Jefferson City slapped something together only in the June special session. Apparently it wasn’t important enough to do in general session.
It is sad to see the Chiefs leave. Really sad. End of an era yada yada yada. We will survive. But it does sting.
It’s time for Jefferson City to do better. To be better.
Lay out publicly in detail what your priorities are and why they are the best priorities for Missourians. Make your case like our founders intended.
Stop rubber stamping the lobbyists and big donor agendas.
Listen and do what your constituents want and need.
Be better. Please.

If that sales tax vote would have been for the Chiefs only, I am certain it would have passed. But the Royals and their confusion concerning what they wanted to do botched the whole thing. Also, as I recall, when the votes for the renovation occurred long ago it was only Jackson and Clay County that voted for them and Kansas didn’t care then. I used to have season tickets to the Chiefs, but the price and other things started to be too much. I can’t even imagine the price the tickets and any parking will be when they build a brand-new domed stadium in Kansas. Since the Chiefs were named after the nickname of then mayor H. Roe Bartle of Kansas City, will the Chiefs change their name? I’m sure that will make a lot of people happy.

we voted on it and it was a no . Why should tax payers pay for a billion dollar stadium for billionaires . Broncos building there own. This falls back on the greed of the owners not the legislation. I disagree with this bill though because it won’t help bring more teams in.

Glad my tax dollars ain’t paying for a new stadium now!

You took care of the chiefs like you do your roads.

That one left a mark…

If you are a Missourian and you learned nothing about the NFL loyalty to the profut margin from the Rams leaving I can’t help you.

Only the wealthy will be able to afford to go to a game. You can expect ticket prices to rise and tax rates to go through the roof. Truth be known, there are likely more season ticket holders in Johnson County than anywhere else.

I couldn’t care less.

And this, sportsfans, is why we cant have nice things.

LOL. The whining is loud today.

As a Missouri taxpayer from the STL……I am happy to no be using my tax money to Prop up a billionaire and his family. The ticket prices would not be cheaper because the taxpayers were footing the bill. Screw the billionaires, let the people of Kansas foot the bill. Shame on the Republicans in Missouri for trying to waste our hard earned tax dollars to go to a billionaire that can pay for the majority themselves. Mayne ot is time for the Missouri legislation to sit this one out.

Someone has daddy issues. They ain’t leaving they’re moving across town. It hurts your wallet not mine.

“…[We] avoid these ends by avoiding these beginnings…”

I want my taxes for this to stop!

The Missouri Republican Party has overseen dozens of companies leaving, major factory closures, the KC Royals looking to Kansas and now, two NFL teams in less than twenty years. Also, they are 500 million dollars in the hole to help the upper earners Is it time to bench the Missouri Republican Party? YES VOTE THEM OUT!!!

The fans spend billions to fund ball players that kneel and hate our flag and what it stands for.
All done while our vets give uncle Sam a blank check over there lives to give millions to guys who are horrible examples to our children. Fans have things backwards!!!!!

Uh, sir, this is a fast food restaurant.

Chiefs absolutely sucked eggs for FIFTY years and Missouri still supported them. They have a few great years (that appear to ending) and immediately cut and run for extra taxpayer dollars extracted from Kansans. Loyalty in sports is absolutely only given by the fans.

Chaser:

Not anymore.

Prophet? Bad omen?

Rick Brattin (r) and Brandon Phelps (r) – Chamber of Commerce “Coffee & Concerns” – Warrensburg, Missouri – October 9, 2025

09 Thursday Oct 2025

Posted by Michael Bersin in Missouri General Assembly, Missouri House, Missouri Senate

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

31st Senate District, 54th Legislative District, Brandon Phelps, Constituents, General Assembly, missouri, Rick Brattin, Warrensburg

[left to right] Brandon Phelps (r), Rick Brattin (r), Bruce Uhler.

Rick Brattin (r – 31st Senate District), Brandon Phelps (r – 54th Legislative District), and Warrensburg Mayor Bruce Uhler attended and spoke at “Coffee & Concerns” – a community event hosted by the Warrensburg Chamber of Commerce – on Wednesday morning. Around fifty individuals were in attendance.

Rick Brattin (r).

A moderator from the Chamber of Commerce started with questions for the panel, then opened up questions from those in attendance. The event lasted over an hour and a half.

The complete audio:

https://showmeprogress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/WbgChamberBrattinPhelps100825.mp3
.
A question from the audience:

Question: …One of my children has a severe disability. So, my question is going to be asking about how will you, um, make sure and, and a specific plan to insure that we are fully funding our schools, especially in those areas of special education. Um, I fear, based on a previous answer you gave, even as the vice-chair of the Education Committee, that you think our schools have more money than we do. Um, and I can tell you that is not the case. Um, so I am curious how you will insure that we are fully finding our schools, not leaving local districts to cover the gap, and how will you make sure we are not diverting funding away from our public schools, uh, via vouchers?

Rick Brattin (r): Why…I’m just like you, I mean, my, I have a daughter that’s a severe dyslexic. I’ve had to privately pay for years and years of tutoring [….] out of my pocket. Uh, and it has been, you know, transformative to be able, but it’s, it’s a life long deal, but I have to, to continually invest in my, my daughter’s capability to be able to flourish. Uh, and I think every student should have that capability. And that’s why I, I’m perplexed at the, the, the opposition to vouchers. You know, why, why I’m paying out of pocket for something that, that yes, if we’re sending taxpayer dollars, why shouldn’t I be able to have that allotment to be able to go to pay for the education that I know my kid is going to be able to flourish in? Uh, instead of walking into a, a type of school system that, uh, is, is a one size fits all approach?

Question: And our taxes pay for public schools. [crosstalk] That cover all students.

Rick Brattin (r): Well, your taxes, our taxes pay for the education of our students. Uh, it doesn’t state that it’s required that it’s public schools. Now we’ve set up that frame work but that doesn’t mean that the legislature and the people don’t want, uh, the capability to go elsewhere if they’re not receiving a good quality education. I mean, look at Kansas City, St. louis, even Lee’s Summit area that I represent a, a portion of. Where they’re at, at twenty, thirty percent, uh, proficiency rates in their readings and math. What are we supposed to do there? Continue to spend money and send our kids there to, to abysmally fail? I, I think it’s a detriment to our students. And especially those that are dyslexic, uh, or have other, uh, disabilities that are totally going under the radar because the school district just, uh, honestly has policies in place that, uh, allow them to be able to, to not be caught.

Well, Congressman Eric Burlison [r – MO 7] is a perfect example. He’s a great friend of mine. His daughters actually through a school district in, in Springfield were, both of them were diagnosed through the school district with dyslexia. The school district opted not to tell the parents. And not to even do anything to, uh, to remedy, trying to help fix their, the, the dyslexia. Until they took them out, got their private, uh, testing done and then the school district after they, actually, caught that they did the testing and refused to, to give that data to the parents, uh, the school district just basically said that they just, you know, uh, didn’t have to. [laugh] And so, I mean, not all school districts are acting in, in good faith and that’s where I think giving the individual parent that capability to take their money, uh, and, and educate their kids where they see fit. Like I had to pull my kids out of, of, Pleasant Hill. Uh, Uh, the public school district and now they’re going to Summit Christian Academy, it’s a private school, and, and they’re, they’re learning well beyond, uh, the, their years of what they would have received, uh, when, when they were at, it’s a, a public school. [….]

Question: Senator, this is not answering my question.

Rick Brattin (r): But, I, I’m just explaining that, that I saw that the school was failing my student and my kids and I had to pull out [crosstalk]…

Question: So you come from a place of privilege where you’re able to pull your children out [crosstalk]…

Rick Brattin (r): I, I make thirty-five thousand dollars a year [crosstalk] as a state senator. I’m not a [crosstalk]…

Question: In, a community like this doesn’t have the access to other schooling systems or, or abilities to send children [crosstalk] to those other places…

Rick Brattin (r): But that’s what it, that’s what [crosstalk] I, if, if we have the systems and processes in place to where we allow the student, uh, the money to follow the student I guarantee you that that will rise up. But when we have a, a monopoly system in education that doesn’t allow for it, of course you’re not gonna have [crosstalk]…

Question: It’s not a monopoly, it’s public education, thank you, senator.

Rick Brattin (r): well it is a monopoly because your taxpayer dollars are forced to go there and regardless if your student is actually even going to that school district. I’m still sending my money to Pleasant Hill School District and I’m paying for my kid’s education as well, on top of the tutoring for my daughter. So yes, I’m paying twice and it’s wrong and people that can’t afford it, they’re trapped. So, I, I’m the chair of Education [Missouri Senate Committee] and this is one of those things that I am emphatically for, is making sure these, these funds follow the student so they can get out of these trapped areas.

Voice: That’s bullshit.

Voices: All right, all right.

Rick Brattin (r): Hey, if you have a great school district then, then you have nothing to worry about. Nothing to worry [crosstalk]…

Question: If you fully fund it.

Rick Brattin (r): It, it is fully funded. At fourteen thousand dollars per pupil, it is funded….

Rick Brattin (r): …Now, as for the separation of church and state, that is nowhere in the Constitution. In fact the, the right to, to freedom of religion is in the Constitution. Uh, the first public education book in the United States is the New England Primer. I highly advise you to go to, to Amazon or Google or, or Ebay, whatever, and purchase a copy and see if separation of church and state of the first ordained public education book was was not religious. I assure you it wasn’t. That, that was not the case. Uh, so this, we, we’ve gotten to this place in America where all the sudden if, if money is utilized to educate students can’t in [inaudible] of faith. I, I think is absolutely the antithesis of America. Uh, we look at things like evolution being forced upon in all public education. Well, that’s, that’s a religion of science that, that’s been adopted and is forced upon the kids. Uh, and, and we’re funding that. I mean, so, to, to say that there’s not that, that aspect of it, it’s already occurring in public education. It’s just the, the secular, uh, world view which the Supreme Court ruled is a religion is, is what the dominant, uh, religion is of, of the school districts. But again, I am not and I do not want to attack the schools. I just want to make sure that, that parents have that capability, ’cause they know what’s best for their kids. Now, do all parents know, there is some crummy parents, there’s some parents that don’t care about their kids, I mean it, and that, that is terrible but, but, we try to do everything we can do with, and, and to make sure that they, they know that. And that’s, that’s my part in it is making sure that they have that capability, uh, to have access to all, uh, educational opportunity as possible. Now, again, we may differ in how and what that looks like, but I assure you I’m not an enemy trying to dismantle everything. I just, I just want there to be a level of competition that makes us all better. I mean, we, we educate and bring up our children to be competitors in every aspect and every realm of life. And then when we talk about vouchers all the sudden it’s, oh we can’t have any level of competition and so on and so forth. I just think that’s, uh, that’s a huge disservice….

[Note: The New England Primer was first published in Boston between 1687 and 1691. Extant copies date from 1727. All well before there was a United States of America.]

[Note: Amendment I – “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…” – U.S. Constitution

I Section 6. “….That no person can be compelled to erect, support or attend any place or system of worship, or to maintain or support any priest, minister, preacher or teacher of any sect, church, creed or denomination of religion…” – Missouri Constitution

I Section 7. “That no money shall ever be taken from the public treasury, directly or indirectly, in aid of any church, sect or denomination of religion, or in aid of any priest, preacher, minister or teacher thereof, as such; and that no preference shall be given to nor any discrimination made against any church, sect or creed of religion, or any form of religious faith or worship….” – Missouri Constitution]

Warrensburg Mayor Bruce Uhler.

Brandon Phelps (r).

Brandon Phelps (r): …Just on a, just on a side note, just something, uh, that was mentioned, and actually, I’ve said this before, maybe it gets mentioned quite often. Um, and, and I can’t speak for the senator, but I imagine that I am. We as legislators listen to you significantly more than you can possibly imagine. The problem is, and I told this to a group a while back, that just because maybe we have voted in a manner that you don’t agree with doesn’t mean that we didn’t understand the legislation. It doesn’t mean that we didn’t listen to constituents. It doesn’t mean that, uh, perhaps, if we haven’t met with you, it doesn’t mean that we’ve met with nobody. Um, and, uh, I discussed this with a group a while back that they just, I think they loved probably ninety-five percent of the things that I voted on and the way that I voted, but there were a few things they just simply didn’t like. And they asked me on those things they didn’t like, they said, well, why didn’t you listen to the people? Why didn’t you read the legislation? How come you didn’t, how come you didn’t understand and educate yourself on the legislation? And I said, so, wait a minute, let me get this clear. So on all the things that I voted in the manner that you like, you assumed I did educate myself. You assumed I did speak to the people. You assumed I did listen to the constituency. But on the three that you didn’t like, you assumed I didn’t read those bills. You assumed that I didn’t listen to constituency, and so I want you all to understand that believe it or not, while we are together right here, and for many of you this is the first opportunity, but for many of you it is not. These events, for me at least, I don’t know about for the senator, um, and so everybody knows, and I, I’m a first year legislator. I will tell you that I was actually just stunned that when session ended how many of these events started getting put on my calendar. I will tell you it’s almost daily. Uh, and when the superintendent told you that we spoke, um, a week and a half ago, we did, for two hours. We, we’ve had an opportunity to speak multiple times. During session he came to my office and we had a long conversations. But, that is that way with everybody. I just would ask people, number one, I want you to understand me. I’m gonna listen to you. I’m gonna hear you. I am going to research. But I would also ask that you don’t make the assumption that if I have not agreed with you on a hundred percent of the issues a hundred percent of the time that I just don’t listen. Because that’s not fair. Because we have thousands, tens of thousands of phone calls and emails. And I actually would tell people that’s one of the things I actually, I, I, I think, I think I told the mayor this, um, I know I told [….] this. That’s one of the things I love most about the job. I’m getting a free education when people come in and share their thoughts and concerns with me. They don’t always agree with me and I don’t always agree with them. But I do listen, I do research, and I do understand that we will not agree one hundred percent of the time on one hundred percent of the issues. It’s not possible. Uh, many of these events I go to, the people in the room, some of them in the room contacted my office or contacted me personally with one opinion, while other people in the room contacted me with another. I actually think that’s what makes us great. I actually believe that you are not supposed to agree with me on everything. And I am not supposed to agree with you on everything. I actually believe that that is what we want to see. Because your competing ideas with my competing ideas make us all better people. I can learn from you. And you can learn from me. But I would only say that that is possible when we have enough open mind to assume that the legislator making the vote didn’t just do it willy-nilly. Perhaps the legislator was listening and did have the info. And at the end of the day we’ve got to vote yes or we’ve got to vote no or we could take the coward’s way out and we could just go for a walk down the Capitol and not be there. I’m always there, I’ve always voted. My door in my office, uh, there are some that are open all day, there are some that are closed during the day. Mine’s never been closed. Uh, and I will tell you, these events, like I say, I, I bet I’ve been to a hundred now since the session ended in May. So we’re listening and I want you to know we’re listening and if you call me I will listen. And if you want to meet, I will meet and we will talk. Because I value it, I really do. I, I just really think that we need to share ideas and I am willing to accept the fact that you’re idea may be better than mine. My idea may be better than yours. But when I vote please don’t make the assumption that I only voted based on my ideas and I did it without any other input….

“…But I do listen, I do research, and I do understand that we will not agree one hundred percent of the time on one hundred percent of the issues. It’s not possible…”

Previously:

HB 291: keping misooree stoopit (January 5, 2013)

Rep. Rick Brattin (r): cdesign proponentsists (February 10, 2013)

Hey Brandon Phelps (r), we hear you’re afraid of church ladies (September 18, 2025)

Raymond James (D) in the 31st Senate District – rights

25 Wednesday Sep 2024

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

31st Senate District, freedom, missouri, Raymond James, Rick Brattin

Ray James (D) [2024 file photo].

Raymond James For Mo Senate #31
[September 25, 2024]

I heard Rick Brattin speak last night he talked of the “WAR” he is in to defend Parents Right to raise their children as they see fit.
Spoke to one of his supporters. Bill Irwin incoming State Rep #55 who ran unopposed. Told him I agree with Rick and him. Parents should be free to raise their children without government interference.

He seemed to agree but quickly wanted to agree to disagree when it comes to libraries. His opinion “objectionable” books should never be in a library. The idea that a parent could decided for themselves if their child could read a book was wrong. Forget putting it back on the shelf – ban it because one member of the community objected.

Tried to get him to understand how Parents should have the right to send their child to private school, home school, public school and to determine health care decisions for them. We seemed to agree until I brought up that includes Parents making decisions to listen to their child and doctors when it comes to trans teens. He said he did not understand. Stated it again but he could not grasp why parents have the right to send their child to a school of their choice but cannot get medical care as advised by their doctor because of his beliefs not the beliefs of the parents or their child. Tried to explain again.

At which point he objected.

He then went off on the Abortion Amendment saying if it passes parents would not have a say in surgeries for their minor children. He seemed to be saying all surgiers. That a minor could get a sex change without a parent agreeing to it.

When challenged to show the wording in the amendment he again chose to agree to disagree and moved away.

Rick and his Christian Nationalist are a threat to our democracy.

No way should this man should have been allowed to run unopposed.

They want Freedom for themselves while telling you how to live your life.

State government should be about good roads, excellent schools, properly functioning State agencies.

The culture “Wars” are started to make a small segment of voters mad. Mad enough to show up at the polls and vote.
I am all about Freedom.

You decide what book to read, get a tattoo or not, wear your hair as you like, marry who you want, raise your children in a church, home school or send them to a public school. Have a breast reduction or a breast enlargement. Wear the clothes you want.

This is the US you have the Freedom to make your choices.
You do not have the Freedom to dictate to others how they have to dress, wear their hair, what they eat, when or how they worship or who they marry.
For now, we also have the freedom of assembly, to gather with like minded people as you see fit. Book club, car shows, church service, bingo at the Legion or attend a Pride event.

What events will Rick and his freedom caucus decide must be canceled next because they don’t approve of them?

What choices will they try and take away from you?

You do you and let others do the same.

What a republican PAC thought of Rick Brattin (r) in the 2022 republican primary in the 4th Congressional District:

31st Senate District – Primary Election – August 6, 2024

06 Tuesday Aug 2024

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

31st Senate District, election, missouri, Primary, Raymond James, Rick Brattin

All that money in the republican primary. And our friends in organized labor could have spent their energy on the real pro-union Democrat instead.

Democrat Ray James will face republican Rick Brattin in the November General Election for the 31st Senate District seat.

Via Missouri Secretary of State:

State of Missouri – Primary Election, August 06, 2024
Unofficial Results
as of 8/6/2024 9:38:46 PM

State Senator – District 31 61 of 61 Precincts Reported

Rick Brattin Republican 11,028 46.966%
Michael Haffner Republican 6,440 27.426%
Dan Houx Republican 6,013 25.608%
Party Total: 23,481

Raymond L. James Democratic 6,040 100.000%
Party Total: 6,040

Total Votes: 29,521

[emphasis added]

Ray James, the Democratic Party candidate in the 31st Senate District.

Rick Brattin [2016 file photo].

Our favorite Rick Brattin (r) image, courtesy of a right wingnut PAC:

Previously:

Some right wingnuts with money really hate Rick Brattin (r) (July 25, 2022)

Are you certain it wasn’t Rick Brattin (r)? (February 3, 2023)

Rick Brattin (r) and his franked list of personal phobias (July 3, 2024)

Campaign Finance: You get what they pay for (July 25, 2024)

Campaign Finance: the money behind the “school choice” voucher scam designed to defund public education (July 30, 2024)

Campaign Finance: You get what they pay for (July 25, 2024)

There is no such thing as a “moderate” republican (July 26, 2024)

Lazy and incurious (July 30, 2024)

Campaign Finance: Solidarity ain’t what it used to be (August 2, 2024)

Do tell us about China (August 2, 2024)

The last piece – with a twist (August 5, 2024)

The last piece – with a twist

05 Monday Aug 2024

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance, meta

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

31st Senate District, campaign finance, Dan Houx, H-PAC, meta, missouri, PAC, Rick Brattin, right wingnuts, theft

The primary election is tomorrow.

The last piece of right wingnut republican attack mail for the 31st Senate District primary arrived in today’s mail:

There isn’t a lick of difference between right wingnut Dan Houx (r) and any of the other right wingnuts running in the republican primary.

“Trying to use taxpayer funds to defend himself in a Twitter [we would have used the term ‘social media’] lawsuit”

True.

Collecting more than $500K in taxpayer funded salaries

That’s probably correct. But it’s a stupid statement. All people who hold elected public office at those levels get paid a salary. Over time it adds up. Dan Houx (r) has been collecting “taxpayer funded salaries” for a while, too.

Sending taxpayer-funded mailers to voters

True. They all can do that. It’s called “franking”. What Rick Brattin (r) did was send a franked piece that looked like a campaign mailing unseemly close to the primary election.

And, China, China, China.

Wait, that image looks familiar.

Those assholes stole my image:

Rick Brattin (r) [2013 Show Me Progress file photo].

[Click on image to enlarge] The dimples and wrinkles in the suit jacket are exactly the same, the hair and hair gel(ish) are exactly the same, the facial expression is exactly the same, the tie and tie knot are exactly the same, the collar and its placement are exactly the same, the stance is exactly the same. They apparently edited out the legislator pin on his lapel.

It was the fifth image in a sequence of five taken from the side gallery of the House chamber:

The image, from external storage/archive:

IMG_6607 [Rick Brattin (r), May 15, 2013]

The data with the original image:

IMG_6607
Type of file: JPG File (JPG)
Size: 5.43 MB (5,694,588 bytes)

Date taken 5/15/2013 1:45 PM
Dimensions 5184 x 3456
Width 5184 pixels
Height 3456 pixels
Horizontal resolution 72 dpi
Vertical resolution 72 dpi
Bit depth 24
Color representation sRGB
Camera maker Canon
Camera model Canon EOS REBEL T4i
F-stop 2.8
Exposure time 1/100 sec
ISO speed ISO-1600
Exposure bias 0 step
Focal length 200 mm

They spent a ton of money on their mailers and yet they were too cheap ass to pay for a tracker or paparazzi to get their own images. They stole mine. Thieving losers.

China, China, China – from a PAC mailer during the right wingnut republican primary in the 4th Congressional District in 2022:

Rick Brattin (r) lost that primary.

Do tell us about China

02 Friday Aug 2024

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

31st Senate District, campaign finance, mailing, Mike Haffner, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, PACs, Primary, Rick Brattin, right wingnut, True Patriot PAC

Our favorite image of Rick Brattin (r):

In today’s mail:

Ironic, eh?

Via the Missouri Ethics Commission:

In the republican primary:

Certified Candidate List
2024 Primary Election
[….]

State Senator – District 31
Republican

Name Mailing Address Random Number Date Filed

Rick Brattin P. O. BOX 421 HARRISONVILLE MO 64701 45 2/27/2024

Michael Haffner PO BOX 407 RAYMORE MO 64083 821 2/27/2024

Dan Houx P. O. BOX 115 WARRENSBURG MO 64093 997 2/27/2024

We’re rooting for a scoreless tie.

Pass the popcorn.

Previously:

Campaign Finance: You get what they pay for (July 25, 2024)

There is no such thing as a “moderate” republican (July 26, 2024)

Lazy and incurious (July 30, 2024)

Campaign Finance: Solidarity ain’t what it used to be (August 2, 2024)

Campaign Finance: Solidarity ain’t what it used to be

02 Friday Aug 2024

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance, Missouri Senate

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

31st Senate District, Dan Houx, mailing, organized labor, PAC, Primary, right wingnut

There is no such thing as a moderate republican. You’d think individuals and organizations would learn. Instead, they persist in wanting to believe in some mythical unicorn despite all evidence to the contray.

In today’s mail:

Venn Diagram of Right Wingnut Orthodoxy – not complete

A right wingnut republican touting an endorsement from the AFL-CIO?

Nothing from Missouri NEA, eh?

And just think of the juxtaposition of an endorsement from the Missouri State Teachers Association (MSTA) with “Defends the 2nd Amendment and voted repeatedly to guarantee Missourians right to conceal and carry”. Missouri Association of School Administrators, too?

“Protecting our kids from liberal indoctrination in our schools”? Is that book banning or book burning? Just asking.

Try as I might, I haven’t been able to find an International Allied Printing Trades Council label – “union bug” – on any of these mailings. Solidarity forever.

Previously:

There is no such thing as a “moderate” republican (July 26, 2024)

Lazy and incurious (July 30, 2024)

Campaign Finance: You get what they pay for

25 Thursday Jul 2024

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

31st Senate District, AFC Victory Fund, Conservative Justice PAC, gaslighting, Herzog Contracting, mailings, missouri, PACs, Paladin PAC, Primary, Rex Sinquefield, Rick Brattin, right wingnuts, The True Patriot PAC

Rick Brattin (r) [2013 file photo].

We’ve been inundated republican primary mail pieces. Inundated is an understatement. Someone is spending a lot of money.

One right wingnut’s state senate primary bid in particular:

And:

Those mailings were paid for by AFC Victory Fund with a return address in Dallas, Texas.

At the Missouri Ethics Commission:

243038 07/11/2024 AFC Victory Fund AFC Victory Fund 228 S Washington St Ste 115 Alexandria VA 22314 7/9/2024 $633,500.00

[emphasis added]

Another set of mailings on behalf of Rick Brattin (r), funded by yet another right wingnut PAC:

And:

And:

And, the pièce de résistance:

Which is it? Did Rick Brattin (r) sell our farmland to China, or not? It’s hard to tell these days, right wingnut republican orthodoxy keeps changing.

These mail pieces were paid for by True Patriot PAC with a return address in Jefferson City, Missouri. And where did they get their money (via the Missouri Ethics Commission)?:

C201494 06/26/2024 True Patriot PAC Conservative Justice PAC 222 West Columbia Street Farmington MO 63640 6/26/2024 $20,000.00

C201494 07/08/2024 True Patriot PAC Rex Sinquefield 244 Bent Walnut Lane Westphalia MO 65085 Retired 7/8/2024 $25,000.00

C201494 07/11/2024 True Patriot PAC Rex Sinquefield 244 Bent Walnut Lane Westphalia MO 65085 Retired 7/11/2024 $25,000.00

C201494 07/11/2024 True Patriot PAC Herzog Contracting Corp PO Box 1089 Saint Joseph MO 64502 7/11/2024 $25,000.00

C201494 07/17/2024 True Patriot PAC Rex Sinquefield 244 Bent Walnut Lane Westphalia MO 65085 Retired 7/17/2024 $25,000.00

C201494 07/17/2024 True Patriot PAC Paladin PAC PO Box 161 Wright City MO 63390 7/17/2024 $6,000.00

C201494 07/24/2024 True Patriot PAC Safe Streets Safe Communities 6218 Georgia Ave NW Suite 1-847 Washington DC 20011 7/23/2024 $47,000.00

[emphasis added]

Aside from mailings funded by different PACS and a blatant campaign franking piece paid for by Missouri taxpayers what do you think Rick Brattin’s campaign is spending money on? Yard signs? Just asking.

Previously:

Some right wingnuts with money really hate Rick Brattin (r) (July 25, 2022)

Are you certain it wasn’t Rick Brattin (r)? (February 3, 2023)

Rick Brattin (r) and his franked list of personal phobias (July 3, 2024)

Rick Brattin (r) and his franked list of personal phobias

03 Wednesday Jul 2024

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

31st Senate District, bigot, franking, General Assembly, mailing, missouri, Rick Brattin, right wingnut

Rep. Rick Brattin (r) [2018 file photo – Jerry Schmidt].

We received a mailing piece promoting Rick Brattin’s (r) special brand of bigotry, apparently a franking piece paid for by our tax dollars.

The badly shopped photo seems to indicate that the Missouri Senate chamber has cheap, kid side desks (it makes sense when you think about it), or Rick Brattin likes to spend his time sternly lecturing Missouri school children when they’re not present in their empty classrooms.

And, of course, the piece lists Rick Brattin’s (r) phobias and legislative priorities.

Fought to ban drag shows from being attended by children

Rick, if you don’t want your kids to watch a drag show, throw your television in the trash.

Passed legislation banning pornographic material from school libraries.

Smart move there, promoting book banning. Rick, if you don’t want your kids to read books just home school them under your supervision.

Passed legislation to prohibit gender reassignment surgery and puberty blockers for children.

Sigh. Rick, just leave these kids and their families alone.

There’s a republican primary:

State Senator – District 31
Republican

Name Mailing Address Random Number Date Filed

Rick Brattin P. O. BOX 421 HARRISONVILLE MO 64701 45 2/27/2024

Michael Haffner PO BOX 407 RAYMORE MO 64083 821 2/27/2024

Dan Houx P. O. BOX 115 WARRENSBURG MO 64093 997 2/27/2024

Rooting for a scoreless tie.

Previously:

Are you certain it wasn’t Rick Brattin (r)? (February 3, 2023)

Addressing Bigotry – Warrensburg, Missouri City Council Meeting – May 8, 2023 – part 3 (May 9, 2023)

In the 31st Senate District

24 Sunday Mar 2024

Posted by Michael Bersin in Missouri General Assembly, Missouri Senate

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

31st Senate District, missouri, Ray James

Ray James (D) [2024 file photo].

Candidate filings in the 31st Senate District:

State Senator – District 31

Republican

Name Mailing Address Random Number Date Filed

Rick Brattin P. O. BOX 421 HARRISONVILLE MO 64701 45 2/27/2024 1:23 p.m.

Michael Haffner PO BOX 407 RAYMORE MO 64083 821 2/27/2024 8:11 a.m.

Dan Houx P. O. BOX 115 WARRENSBURG MO 64093 997 2/27/2024 1:15 p.m.

Democratic

Name Mailing Address Random Number Date Filed

Raymond L. James 552 SE HIGHWAY EE LEETON MO 64761 3/21/2024 10:48 a.m.

[emphasis added]

← Older posts

Recent Posts

  • Campaign Finance: standing up
  • You are here
  • Fuck ICE
  • You and what army, Donald (r)?
  • Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D): on Venezuela

Recent Comments

Bob Yates on Fuck ICE
Mike’s Blog Round-Up… on Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D): on V…
And here we all are… on Now do Juan Orlando Hernández…
Campaign Finance: un… on Campaign Finance: Isn’t…
Top Ten Traffic Post… on Didn’t think this one th…

Archives

  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,022,014 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

 

Loading Comments...