You really should read this short article by The Political Animal‘s Martin Longman which discusses the implications of the Missouri legislature’s override of Governor Nixon’s veto of SB656 (deregulated “constitutional” carry)> and the Voter ID (voter suppression) bill. As Longman sees it, this type of legislation is dangerous in more than the obvious ways :

I could go into more detail on the merits and pitfalls of both bills, but I’d rather focus on the message they send. In making it much harder to vote at the same time that they make it much easier to carry a firearm, the Missouri GOP is inviting the conclusion that political disputes are best settled (and perhaps can only be settled) with violence.

That might sound extreme, but using the legislature and referendums to enact unconstitutional restrictions of your political opponents’ power is delegitimizing to representative government and therefore eats away at the consent of the governed. What you’re saying is that we need less democracy, less dissent, and more guns. It’s almost a recognition that, in undermining the legitimate governmental function of the state, you’ll need to arm yourself for protection.

I agree with Longman, and would suggest that what we see in this spate of increasingly extreme and weakly justified gun proliferation and voter suppression laws is part of the same phenomena that includes both the destructive, fantastical rhetoric and the hitherto unimaginable levels of legislative obstructionism on the part of Republican politicians.

These strategies are employed as tools by elected officials, often to further the goals of wealthy interests , the Citizens United crowd, who now expect to freely purchase government, and who saw the election of Barack Obama as antithetical to that end – and who view Hillary Clinton as the same type of threat. Combine that impetus with the latent racism stimulated by the election of the first black president, and you’ve got the situation that Longman describes, “when people lose faith in the ballot box and turn to the gun” in order to “arrest the march of history.”

Given the pervasive emphasis on guns in recent elections, there seems to be a lot of such people in Missouri. As we have seen, it has been fertile ground for the NRA. And, given recent state-level polls, not a bad place for growing Trumpkins.

From Rep. Billy Long’s (R-7) statement justifying a vote for a budgetary continuing resolution that seeks to delay Obamacare for a year, a vote that guarantees a government shutdown:

“Our military men and women put their lives on the line to protect our country and freedoms.  We owe it to them and their families to ensure they continue to receive their paychecks in the event of a government shutdown.”

Somebody needs to break it to Billy that he’s had two opportunities within the last week to ensure that our military men and women get what’s due to them, and he bungled both for no reason other than to make a stink about a duly enacted law that he and a few of his friends don’t like.

Maybe Billy doesn’t understand that votes have consequences and that this particular vote might very well create difficulties for lots of Americans, including the military members that he’s so worried about. This supposition may be correct since he doesn’t seem to understand that elections, such as the two that brought Barack Obama to the White House and then retained him in the presidency, should have meaningful consequences.

Or alternatively, maybe Billy just doesn’t like democracy. That’s right, democracy. The will of the people. Which is what 65 million Americans spelled out clearly last fall when they voted for the man who gave us Obamacare. Further, many of us who exercised our democratic perogative last November are also part of the ca. 69% of Americans who think Billy and his GOP pals should give the anti-Obamacare tantrums a rest. How democratic is it to thwart the will of the people?

It’s always fun to take a look at particularly amusing past mistakes. In that spirit I offer this video of former State Rep. Cynthia Davis regaling a gathering with the reasons they should vote for her, the Constitution Party Candidate, for Lieutenant Governor this fall (h/t The Turner Report):

It’s the standard, sweetly oblivious Tea Party Cynthia we all remember so fondly, patting herself on the back for being the “most constitutional” legislator in Missouri, issuing the routine condemnations of government as incompetent and out to “ruin our lives.”

Oddly, though, Davis doesn’t seem to realize what it means that that she got a chance to fix what she perceived as wrong by serving in government. That fact might suggest to some that government actually serves a legitimate purpose and that we need it. Additionally, if, in democracies at least, individuals can enter government to correct perceived problems – and here I’m not making any judgments about the corrections a Cynthia Davis would pursue – it means that in general government has the power to self-correct through the agency of engaged citizenry, something that is not always true of other social institutions – particularly when it comes to private enterprise of which folks like Davis seem to be so enamoured.

Davis does, though, to give her credit, put her finger on a big problem facing our democracy right now. Seems that Cynthia has learned the hard way that politics involves money – and was shocked to learn that her fellow GOPers did favors in return for hefty campaign dollars. Pervasive corruption she implies, is why she, a seeming bastion of “constitutional” purity, decamped from the GOP.

Of course, a meaner-minded person than I might ask if Davis hadn’t actually been rejected by the party first – and perhaps might still be going great GOP guns if she had prevailed against Scott Rupp in the 2010 state Senatorial primary, or if her short tenure as Chair of the St. Charles Republican Party had been happier. Nevertheless, she deserves credit for speaking up now about a real and very obvious problem in Missouri (and in the wake of Citizens United, elsewhere) where untrammeled campaign donations flow far too freely with no accountability.  Ask yourself, though, if someone as lame as Davis can, in her halting way, identify the biggest problem facing our democracy today, the role of big money, hadn’t we  better get busy and do something about it before it’s too late?

Addendum:  More on money and political favors: Paul Blumenthal and Howard Fineman write that what Super PAC donors really want is a return on their investment. Also, more on the “dark money” that, via, for example, Crossroads GPS, is influencing elections right here in Missouri – just ask Claire McCaskill who’s been blitzed with Crossroads ads and billboards – and who’s now, as a result, according to the most recent poll running behind every one of the sad doofuses vying for the GOP nomination.  

The tides were shifting in the founding era that brought forth our nation in the Revolutionary Year of 1776.

On New Year’s Day, after a speech by King George III is read condemning the colonist’s rebellion, General Washington unfurls the new red-and-white striped Grand Union flag on Prospect Hill overlooking Boston Harbor. On January 9th, Thomas Paine’s “Common Sense” is published. The machines of popular persuasion were revving up-the enterprise had begun.

As the American colonists contemplated severing their political ties with Mother England, a new vision of a people self-determining their own form of government was taking shape. Ameliorating the causes of oppression, tyranny and calamity opened the door to the American experiment.

The principles for separation were laid out in Thomas Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. – That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, – That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”

Recently, new imaging technology employed by the Library of Congress has revealed in an early draft of the Declaration, Jefferson changed the word “subjects”, as in Imperial subjects, to “citizens”. It may have been a slip of the pen, but even so, it clearly shows the status quo was not so easily left behind.

Library of Congress preservation director Dianne van der Reyden said during the announcement of the discovery,

“It’s almost like we can see him write ‘subjects’ and then quickly decide that’s not what he wanted to say at all, that he didn’t even want a record of it… really, it sends chills down the spine.”

The Founders and Framers vision of a different reality required a transcendent resolve to become so, as this new conception of freedom required a falling away and letting go of obsolete memes; ways of thinking no longer in tune with the evolution of human civilization.

On Fourth of July, we celebrate the origins of America, and revere the champions of Liberty that fought to create a nation of equals setting in motion a continuing, evolving process based upon the immutable ideals of freedom, equality and dignity for all; Spiritually sound principles of governance. This struggle was not solely played out on a field of war, it was fought on a field of ideas and first in the minds of women and men who led the way.

Six years ago, while in the Holy Land, I imagined the stormy tempest our beloved Abraham Lincoln, American messiah, was forced to weather to fulfill his destiny.    

This Fourth of July, 2004 here in the Jordan Valley makes me think about the kind of patriotism as expressed by our fore-fathers. What was at the core of their motivations? What empowers a leader to stay the course even in the midst of a crowd of naysayers? This has to be a patriotism not about waving flags of a nation state, but rather a fervor for the love of humanity with an unshakable resolve. Driven by higher standards of understanding, not the next quarterly business report or electoral cycle. Great thinkers and statesmen like Jefferson, Adams, Washington… Lincoln.

Picture this.

Oval Room. White House. “Mr. President, have you considered letting a few of the states, say four or five, continue their program of indentured servitude, and placate this upcoming rift – save your Presidency – let’s get to making the country prosperous again.”

“You mean slavery, don’t you?” Abe said.

“Well, you use such a harsh word, I’m sure that through some governmental initiative, we could give the blackies some taste of real citizenry.”

Abe stared at him, unemotionally. The politician started to get uneasy with the silence, and attempted another tactic. “Your wife has relatives in the South, Mr. President, do you really want to continue to wage this war with states that have taken a Constitutionally justifiable position? Save your Presidency, the South has already mobilized thousands of men in Virginia, it’s going to be a blood bath.” He paused. The tall gaunt Lincoln resembled a tree, not moving, not betraying any reaction. The man looked around, and then continued.

“Maybe the Carolinas, Virginia – If you insist on hammering through the position of the Abolitionists, who knows what that will do to the economy of our whole country? It will be destroyed. And who knows, with a weakened state like that, a European alliance could reclaim the Americas, no, no it’s too risky. Save your Presidency, Abraham. Please think about what you’re doing.”

“Look sir, I don’t know what kind of politics are usually practiced around these parts of the Eastern coast, but back where I come from politicians that waver like the flavor of the day get run out of town – I have not come this far, educated by my dear Bible – the Word of God, to come to some cockamamie solution that says half slavery is alright – that half-citizenry is alright. I know if I let this secession occur, it will be the end of us as a great nation. It will be the end of the American dream. And over my dead body will we end what so many of our forefathers sacrificed their lives for – and the future, no doubt, holds as many sacrifices.

The red on that flag means something to me sir, and if I were you I would cut yourself to see if your blood is red, because the men who have died to give prosperity to this country were true red-blooded Americans. I fear the day when the men of this country will no longer understand that concept. I fear that the prosperity we engender, could be the lap of luxurious complacency that will be our downfall. If this secession is successful, we will fall into the pit of nation warring despair that the European continent has wallowed in for oh so many centuries. No, I do not intend any half measure with the sanctity of this God given freedom. I know I am here to finish Jefferson’s work that was so erroneously compromised out of our Great Declaration. I know I am here not to break the Constitution, but rather defend the hopes, wishes, and dreams of our forefathers. I will enact emergency powers legislation to preserve this Union under God, to preserve Humanity’s last hope for survival. We The People. If this Great War rips this country to shreds, in shreds it will still stand as One. It will stand tall, shredded and great. You are excused, sir.”

With that Abraham Lincoln walked out of the Oval office, and thanked God for the angel of distraction that made him to be so resolute to carry out his purpose. To save the last hope of humanity, The Government of the people and by the people. All people. E pluribus unum, you see?

It’s an evolved extension of Lincoln’s and Jefferson’s work that views humanity as one tribe, as one people.

In an earlier column on James Cameron’s Avatar,

“As professed in a classic 60’s Star Trek episode, the values set forth in America’s founding documents must apply to all — or they mean nothing. Of course it would be unwise and currently impossible to extend the reach of Constitutional protections to all humanity, but purposefully participating and benefiting from the subjugation and exploitation of other peoples is anathema to any conception of moral consistency.”

On this Fourth of July, remember the unsettling nature of progress as it seeks to overturn ideas that no longer serve. 1776 was unsettling, as was our Civil War. Be open to the fact that a new way to look at things may seem alarming at first, but in the big picture, that’s a good thing. Unnerving concepts like freeing a nation
or freeing slaves were, in the end, the right thing to do. In the near future, we may be faced with new ideas that seem just as threatening as those were to some in years past. Keep in mind that it’s far easier to like what you know, than to know what you like.

Happy Fourth of July, America.