• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Monthly Archives: October 2017

Gov. Eric Greitens (r): high or petty

11 Wednesday Oct 2017

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

Eric Greitens, facebook, governor, missouri, social media, take a knee

“….If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein….”

Erics Greitens (r) [2016 file photo].

In 1943, in a time of war, no less:

WEST VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL. v. BARNETTE ET AL., 319 U.S. 624

[….]

….To sustain the compulsory flag salute we are required to say that a Bill of Rights which guards the individual’s right to speak his own mind, left it open to public authorities to compel him to utter what is not in his mind.

Whether the First Amendment to the Constitution will permit officials to order observance of ritual of this nature does not depend upon whether as a voluntary exercise we would think it to be good, bad or merely innocuous. Any credo of nationalism is likely to include what some disapprove or to omit what others think essential, and to give off different overtones as it takes on different accents or interpretations. If official power exists to coerce acceptance of any patriotic creed, what it shall contain cannot be decided by courts, but must be largely discretionary with the ordaining authority, whose power to prescribe would no doubt include power to amend. Hence validity of the asserted power to force an American citizen publicly to profess any statement of belief or to engage in any ceremony of assent to one presents questions of power that must be considered independently of any idea we may have as to the utility of the ceremony in question….

[….]

….Struggles to coerce uniformity of sentiment in support of some end thought essential to their time and country have been waged by many good as well as by evil men. Nationalism is a relatively recent phenomenon but at other times and places the ends have been racial or territorial security, support of a dynasty or regime, and particular plans for saving souls. As first and moderate methods to attain unity have failed, those bent on its accomplishment must resort to an ever-increasing severity. [319 U.S. 624, 641]   As governmental pressure toward unity becomes greater, so strife becomes more bitter as to whose unity it shall be. Probably no deeper division of our people could proceed from any provocation than from finding it necessary to choose what doctrine and whose program public educational officials shall compel youth to unite in embracing. Ultimate futility of such attempts to compel coherence is the lesson of every such effort from the Roman drive to stamp out Christianity as a disturber of its pagan unity, the Inquisition, as a means to religious and dynastic unity, the Siberian exiles as a means to Russian unity, down to the fast failing efforts of our present totalitarian enemies. Those who begin coercive elimination of dissent soon find themselves exterminating dissenters. Compulsory unification of opinion achieves only the unanimity of the graveyard.

It seems trite but necessary to say that the First Amendment to our Constitution was designed to avoid these ends by avoiding these beginnings. There is no mysticism in the American concept of the State or of the nature or origin of its authority. We set up government by consent of the governed, and the Bill of Rights denies those in power any legal opportunity to coerce that consent. Authority here is to be controlled by public opinion, not public opinion by authority.

The case is made difficult not because the principles of its decision are obscure but because the flag involved is our own. Nevertheless, we apply the limitations of the Constitution with no fear that freedom to be intellectually and spiritually diverse or even contrary will disintegrate the social organization. To believe that patriotism will not flourish if patriotic ceremonies are voluntary and spontaneous instead of a compulsory routine is to make an unflattering estimate of the appeal of our institutions to free minds. We can have intellectual individualism [319 U.S. 624, 642] and the rich cultural diversities that we owe to exceptional minds only at the price of occasional eccentricity and abnormal attitudes. When they are so harmless to others or to the State as those we deal with here, the price is not too great. But freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much. That would be a mere shadow of freedom. The test of its substance is the right to differ as to things that touch the heart of the existing order.

If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein. If there are any circumstances which permit an exception, they do not now occur to us….

[….]

What a great and confident country.

Today, via social media, from the Governor of Missouri:

Eric Greitens

The flag brings real patriots to their feet, not their knees.

In the military, every one of us wore the American flag. In fact, it’s one of the only common features of all military uniforms. You could be in a different branch, have a different rank, wear different awards—but all soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines wore the stars and stripes.

You didn’t just wear it every day. One of the first things they teach you in the military is how to salute. It’s a precise, practiced movement, and it is governed by a set of rules. You practice your salute over and over again until you get it right. And believe me, your drill instructors make sure you get it right. Why? Because, as we were taught, the salute is how members of the military show their respect to each other—and it is also how we pay respect to the flag.

Even today, out of uniform, my body reacts by instinct when I see the flag. Eyes front. Heels together. Toes apart. Back straight. Arms at my side. Watch a crowd the next time a flag is raised or brought out in a parade. You can pick out—straight away—the people who served in the military. They’ll be standing at attention.
The US military honors the flag in other ways, too. There are units in the service called Honor Guards: their job is protect the flag, to bring it to funerals, to make sure it is cared for and folded in accordance with our rules. Being selected for one of these units is a high honor.

At night, on US bases around the world, the flag is lowered with care, folded 13 times, and placed under watch. It is unfolded with devotion early each morning and raised aloft. That too is a sacred duty.

From the moment a slain American service member is placed inside a casket, a flag covers them. When the body is set to be lowered into the ground, that flag is folded, and given to the family of the fallen—a symbol of our country’s devotion to them and their loved one’s devotion to our country.

These are some of the most important rituals in the military, as vital as any of our drills or the maintenance of our equipment. In the service, we gave the flag its proper respect.

When the flag is raised, we stand as Americans. We stand because America represents a promise that is larger than all of us. When people refuse to stand for the flag, they make that moment about them. It’s a shame that some people would use our country’s greatest symbol of selfless service for a selfish act.

We’ll always have differences as a country, but the flag deserves reverence from all of us, no matter our disagreements. That’s what I was taught, and it’s what I will teach my children. God bless the United States, our servicemen and servicewomen, and our flag.

Petty.

“…It’s a shame that some people would use our country’s greatest symbol of selfless service for a selfish act…”

Selfish? That tells us much more about the writer than anyone else.

Our nation’s greatest representation is the Constitution and its over 200 years of history.

“….To believe that patriotism will not flourish if patriotic ceremonies are voluntary and spontaneous instead of a compulsory routine is to make an unflattering estimate of the appeal of our institutions to free minds….”

Those who ignore history are condemned to repeat it.

In the gallery – today

10 Tuesday Oct 2017

Posted by Michael Bersin in meta, Resist

≈ 8 Comments

Tags

#resist, gallery, missouri, photography, protest, The Poetry of Protest

“The Poetry of Protest” our show in the Gallery of Art and Design at the University of Central Missouri of large prints of photographs from rallies, protests, marches, and demonstrations opened on September 26th.

At 3:00 p.m. today we’ll be in the gallery to talk about the exhibit with anyone who wants to listen.

Previously:

The Poetry of Protest (September 9, 2017)

In the gallery (September 21, 2017)

In the gallery – part 2 (September 23, 2017)

In the gallery – part 3 (September 26, 2017)

In the gallery – comments (September 30, 2017)

In the gallery – comments – part 2 (October 3, 2017)

In the gallery – comments – part 3 (October 4, 2017)

In the gallery – comments – part 4 (October 6, 2017)

Josh Hawley (r): looking to unload that apartment in Jefferson City

10 Tuesday Oct 2017

Posted by Michael Bersin in US Senate

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

Claire McCaskill, Josh Hawley, missouri, U.S. Senate

There are easier ways to do so.

Senator Claire McCaskill (D) – town hall in Warrensburg – Press Q and A – August 17, 2017 (August 17, 2017)

[….]
Question: And then, uh, I, I realize that you are not here in any political capacity but, do you have any thoughts on the Attorney General’s ongoing controversy about his residency and where he voted? Have you followed that at all, or are you not even paying any attention to that?

Senator McCaskill: Well, it would be hard not to follow it. The law is pretty clear. There’s never been an Attorney General in the history of our state that hasn’t lived in Jefferson City because the law says shall. He’s, listen, I’m a Mizzou educated lawyer, but I can keep up. [laughter] And I know what the word shall means in the law. Now I know he went to Yale, I think, or Harvard, one of those, one of those fancy ones. Um, I think they taught him the same thing, shall is shall. So if it’s shall then you must live in Jefferson City. And you are not legally entitled to vote somewhere other than where you live. Oh there’s a problem here. Either [crosstalk]…

Question: So there is voter fraud in Missouri, is that what you’re saying?

Senator McCaskill: Well, I, there may be. But, that’s not for me to decide. But the issue is, either he’s violating the law by not living in Jefferson City, or he’s violating the law by voting someplace he doesn’t live. One of the two.
[….]

Apparently Josh Hawley (r) has decided to run for the U.S. Senate.

You think he believes it’ll be easy? Just asking.

Previously:

Attorney General Josh Hawley (r): the pepul of Misoori our stoopit (January 23, 2017)

HB 797: no confidence in the legal opinion of Attorney General Josh Hawley (r) (January 31, 2017)

Josh Hawley (r): well, maybe (July 11, 2017)

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): jump on that publicity stunt bandwagon

08 Sunday Oct 2017

Posted by Michael Bersin in social media

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

4th Congressional District, First Amendment, Mike Pence, Misouri, protest, social media, Twitter, Vicky Hartzler

Representative Vicky Hartzler (r) [2016 file photo].

Today, from Representative Vicky Hartzler (r), via Twitter:

Rep. Vicky Hartzler‏ @RepHartzler
I applaud VP @mike_pence for standing for our, our military, & our country by not supporting those who take a knee rather respecting same.
3:44 PM – 8 Oct 2017

Some of the comments reacting to Representative Hartzler’s (r) cheerleading for Mike Pence’s publicity stunt:

In other words? You don’t understand the First Amendment either. Resign.

A photo op ordered by racist leader. Do u know why people are kneeling Vicky? Do u care? Or is big lobby $ more important than 1st amend?

It was a publicity stunt that cost taxpayers thousands of dollars. So, thanks for wasting my money to try and make your party look cool

Morally Bankrupt Pence Stages Fake Outrage. No Comments on KLAN RALLY. Vicky, You can;t wrap everything in patriotism.

If anything it’s you & the right who are being disrespectful by brining the flag, anthem, and military into a debate they have nothing to…
…to do with. You’ve hijacked legitimate peaceful, silent protest & made it about patriotism and race. Shameful, transparent, irresponsible

You are not a serious person. Tweeting on this subject is not helping anyone. It’s an embarrassing fundraising tweet.

how do you feel about the wasted tax payers money btw?

Constitution mean much to you?

He wasted taxpayer money on a flight for a pre-planned political stunt. And you support that? You are truly horrible.

You should focus on WHY ppl are taking a knee. Some of it has to do with our white supremacist govt & ppl like yourselves who are hateful.

58 people were murdered and 500 more shot on the streets of an American city last week, and this is what you’re concerned with?

Paid protester < real protester

Protesting injustice is supporting the flag twit, I spent time in a combat zone, you?

You misunderstand & intentionally misconstrue the purpose of kneeling. Reason has always been to protest police violence and racism.

So Mike Pence can exercise his 1st Amendment right, but athletes can’t? How does this work, exactly?

And as usual you’re missing the point. These athletes taking a knee aren’t protesting the military. You’re being obtuse.

It was a stunt that Doltard J Trump put him up to, all fake patriotism down to years old picture he tweeted. Y’all say nothing about racism

You are unfit for office if you don’t understand the constitution and the right to protest. Delete your account & resign.

You are a fake patriot ignoring the injustices that are suffered under the “protection” of law enforcement. The VP wasted taxpayers money.

Why would you voluntarily inject yourself into an already failing stunt?

In 1943, in a time of war, no less:

WEST VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL. v. BARNETTE ET AL., 319 U.S. 624
“….If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein. If there are any circumstances which permit an exception, they do not now occur to us….”

High or petty.

Campaign Finance: now they’re getting serious

08 Sunday Oct 2017

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

campaign finance, initiative, medical marijuana, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission

Really green.

Today at the Missouri Ethics Commission in support of a medical marijuana [pdf] ballot initiative:

C151082 10/08/2017 New Approach Missouri Larry Malashock 248 Brooktrail Ct Saint Louis MO 63141 Amalaco Retired 10/6/2017 $50,000.00

C151082 10/08/2017 New Approach Missouri Drug Policy Action 131 West 33rd Street New York NY 10001 10/6/2017 $100,000.00

[emphasis added]

Previously:

Campaign Finance: medical marijuana (October 7, 2017)

Campaign Finance: up in smoke

08 Sunday Oct 2017

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

campign finance, HRCC, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, tobacco

Yesterday at the Missouri Ethics Commission for the House Republican Campaign Committee:

C091068 10/07/2017 HOUSE REPUBLICAN CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE, INC RAI Services Company PO Box 464 Winston-Salem NC 27102 10/6/2017 $10,000.00

[emphasis added]

Cough, cough. Is anyone surprised?

Campaign Finance: medical marijuana

07 Saturday Oct 2017

Posted by Michael Bersin in campaign finance

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

initiative, medical marijuana, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission

In the past week at the Missouri Ethics Commission in support of a medical marijuana [pdf] ballot initiative

C161165 09/30/2017 NEW APPROACH PAC Manon Herzog 321 Rosedale Avenue St Louis MO 63112 Herzog & Schindler 9/30/2017 $5,001.00

C161165 10/02/2017 NEW APPROACH PAC Vance Farms 1522 Madison 212 Fredericktown MO 63645 9/30/2017 $10,000.00

C161165 10/05/2017 NEW APPROACH PAC Larry Ellison 1001 S Pickwick Springfield MO 65804 EllisonLiggett Litigation Services 10/3/2017 $30,000.00

C161165 10/06/2017 NEW APPROACH PAC Josh Ungaro 6433 S. Valley Brook Ct. Springfield MO 65810 The Mid-West Transfer, LLC 10/6/2017 $10,000.00

C161165 10/06/2017 NEW APPROACH PAC Summit Meadow, LLC 5051 S. National Avenue, Bldg. 5-100 Springfield MO 65810 10/6/2017 $10,000.00

C161165 10/07/2017 NEW APPROACH PAC The Smart Age, LLC 16216 Baxter Road Chesterfield MO 63017 10/6/2017 $85,000.00

Green.

Missouri – where politics equal one sad belly laugh after another

07 Saturday Oct 2017

Posted by willykay in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Courtland Sykes, Ed Martin, Josh Hawley, missouri, primary elections, republicans, Steve Bannon, U.S. Senate

Yesterday I wrote that there was a perception that the demented political pixie, Ed Martin, and Josh “Dudley Do-right” Hawley were jockeying for the Steve Bannon blessing in the Missouri GOP senatorial primary lineup. But I spoke too soon. There’s a new candidate and he’s a doozy. Actually, he’s a doozy’s doozy. His name is Courtland Sykes.

Remember Sykes’ name because you may be hearing it lots in the months to come. If the folks in Missouri are as smart as we hope they are, the name will be the butt of lots of hilarity. If we, however, conform to what I fear is an all-too-possible Missouri outcome, it could be the name of one of our U.S. Senators. In the age of Trump, nothing, no matter how outlandish or stupid, can be counted out. And, don’t forget, President Moron took Missouri with points to spare.

The St. Louis Post-Dispatch dubs Sykes a “mystery” candidate because he isn’t a known Missouri political entity (actually, with less than a year’s residence in the state, he may not even be properly called a Missourian). But, as the Post-Dispatch profile itself reveals, there’s not much about Sykes that’s mysterious – other than the motivation for his belief that he should run for office. Read the PD article. It’s straight-up reporting and yet it’s knee-slapping funny. Sykes comes off as a cartoon version of Trump – which is a difficult trick since Trump comes off as a cartoon version of a political leader.

Let me count the ways Sykes rings the Trumpian bell. There’s misogyny, bigotry, and stupidity in one neat”outsider” package. He want’s us to know that he’s manly – he characterizes other politicians as “effete.”According to the PD, he had difficulty answering substantive questions and puffed up his credentials Trump-style to inflate his image. Oh, I almost forgot, he hates swamps too – strange how all the political swamp-dwellers want us to know that they don’t really like swamps.

Sykes is betting that Steve Bannon – with whom he “exchanged pleasantries” during Bannon’s recent visit to Missouri – will find the package irresistible. I’d say that whether or not that proved to be the case could provide a type of intelligence test for Bannon, but, hey, the guy went for Trump – and with a little Russian help propelled him into the presidency, so who knows?

In case you’re wondering, the Post-Dispatch consulted with a political science professor at St. Louis Community College and he responded that he’s 99.9% sure that this candidacy isn’t a big joke – or a Democratic Party prank. That comment says it all.

In the gallery – comments – part 4

06 Friday Oct 2017

Posted by Michael Bersin in Resist

≈ 10 Comments

Tags

#resist, gallery, photography, Poetry of Protest

“The Poetry of Protest” our show in the Gallery of Art and Design at the University of Central Missouri of large prints of photographs from rallies, protests, marches, and demonstrations opened on September 26th. We left an open notebook with blank pages and pencils on a podium next to the exhibit title wall. We get comments.

The photos are absolutely amazing but I don’t believe they show all sides of American protests. They may be a little biased. Great shots though!

Well, okay. We appreciate the praise. This is an exhibit in an art gallery. As we’ve said before: “A gallery exhibit is not a vehicle for the ‘all opposing views are equal’ mantra in some circles of old media.”

How did we get to the point as a culture that the arguably false premise in old media that all opposing views are equal and must be aired equally is the expected norm for everything? Well, of course, question everything. But sometimes a stupid idea is just a stupid idea and it’s not worth equal consideration or weight in anyone’s book.

We covered what we covered, photographed what we photographed. We selected images based on a number of criteria (and so did the gallery director) – relevance, quality, aesthetics. A massive number of images were considered, but weren’t printed. Some images made it to print, but weren’t brought to the gallery. Some of the prints brought to the gallery were not displayed. In one case we forgot to pack one of the very large prints with the others (that’s easier than you think when you’re delivering close to seventy prints) – it never made it to the gallery.

It would be impossible to cover and “show all sides of American protest”. Again, some protests were so minimal or obscure and there was no public notice. We’re not omniscient, nor do we claim to be. Sometimes we covered other protests but we failed to get any “good” images. That could mean something as mundane as poor focus or unredeemable composition in the images. Like people who fish we sometimes talk about the ones that got away.

There is the matter of saturation. In case anyone hasn’t noticed there are a lot people protesting a lot of things. Again, as we said before: “Right wingnuts in America now have everything they’ve ever wanted – they control the Presidency, Congress, and the Supreme Court. For the most part they’re not in the streets protesting in any significant numbers…”

All art is biased.

Previously:

The Poetry of Protest (September 9, 2017)

In the gallery (September 21, 2017)

In the gallery – part 2 (September 23, 2017)

In the gallery – part 3 (September 26, 2017)

In the gallery – comments (September 30, 2017)

In the gallery – comments – part 2 (October 3, 2017)

In the gallery – comments – part 3 (October 4, 2017)

Josh Hawley wants a little of that Bannon crazy cred

06 Friday Oct 2017

Posted by willykay in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Claire McCaskill, Ed Martin, Josh Hawley, missouri, Republican Party, Steve Bannon

For months on end we’ve heard that the “respectable” wing of the Missouri GOP, i.e., the corporatist, country club set, have set their hopes on Attorney General Josh Hawley as the perfect candidate to fell Democratic Senator Claire McCaskill come next November. He has been the protege of no lesser Missouri Republican luminary that the august John Danforth – the very John Danforth who has publicly vilified “hateful” Donald Trump and his influence on the Republican party – a point of view about which Hawley has maintained a marked silence.

And there’s good reason for Hawley to avoid controversy. GOPland is in turmoil. The assorted racists and otherwise disaffiliated right wingers to whom the respectable Republicans have thrown a few crumbs now and then are organizing to take over the party. Steve Bannon, Trump’s would-be brain, is threatening to make good on his desire to transform the GOP into a fascist “workers” party allied to the more déclassé (i.e., racist) elements of the conservative right. The recent electoral success in Alabama of über nujtjob Roy Moore, Bannon’s candidate of choice, is giving Republican politicians a serious case of the jitters – including, evidently, the oh-so prim Josh Hawley who, in better times, would probably have run a mile from a piece of work like Bannon.

To give Hawley credit where credit is due, he’s proactive; Politico reports today that he picked up the ball and tried to lob it into Bannon’s court:

Two Republican sources said Attorney General Josh Hawley, a soft-spoken 37-year-old with an Ivy League pedigree who is expected to officially announce a run soon, called Bannon late last week, after The New York Times reported the Breitbart leader was targeting Hawley for defeat in Missouri’s GOP Senate primary. Republicans, who saw their last chance to defeat McCaskill slip away after they nominated gaffe-prone then-Rep. Todd Akin, fear Bannon’s interference could cause a similar outcome in 2018.

On the call, Hawley reminded Bannon of their mutual friends, including the Mercer megadonor family, which bankrolls much of Bannon’s political work. Hawley met with Robert Mercer last fall when he was running for attorney general, one Republican close to Hawley said. Hawley also mentioned Club for Growth President David McIntosh and conservative legal expert Leonard Leo, who advises President Donald Trump on judicial nominations.

And just who would take the role of Todd Akin this go round? Why, Politico suggests, none other than Ed Martin, sleazebag and potential spoiler extraordinaire. You can understand why Hawley and Missouri’s GOP establishment might be just a little alarmed. Martin has his adherents, but he is just too well known in Missouri in ways that might alienate votes that would be crucial in a statewide election.

Robert Kutner makes a persuasive case in The American Prospect that neither Bannon nor GOPers like Hawley are likely to fare too well in their attempt to make common cause. They’re just different kinds of beasts:

… Bannon hopes he can find outsiders who are both social conservatives and Bannon-style economic populists.

The trouble is that this category of Republican candidate is almost a null set. There are none in Congress, and that’s no accident.

For decades, right-wing Republican candidates have gotten elected by marrying social conservatism to big-business conservatism. If Bannon thinks he can break that link, he has his work cut out.

It’ll be interesting to see if Hawley can effect a political marriage of minds (or if his donors can). If he weren’t cast in the traditional conservative mold that Bannon professes to abhor, he wouldn’t be filling the role of fair-haired child for the John Danforths of the Missouri GOP. He may be fine when it comes to “guns, God, and gays,” but will he really buck the more genteel big money boys he is currently so identified with?

And while Martin is no more of a “pocketbook populist” than Hawley – at least to date – he’s also crude, dishonest, and opportunistic, and, I’d be willing to lay odds, more than willing to take on the role of populist if it advanced his personal agenda – after all, Trump is no more of a populist than Martin, but he has just enough of the vocabulary to try to claim the label. And, of course, Martin is also, with his genius for the colossal cock-up, the perfect vehicle for Bannonesque disruption.

Kutner observes that “the result of a Bannon-led civil war in the Republican Party could well be a GOP even more extremist—and more of a national minority party.” The Missouri Hawley-Martin-Bannon triangle will play out against this scenario. What does this mean for Missouri? Kutner offers a suggestion:

… . In states that have populist Democrats on the ballot, such as Senator Sherrod Brown in Ohio, it is hard to imagine a Bannon-backed social conservative getting to Brown’s left on pocketbook issues. But centrist Democrats could be vulnerable—if Bannon could truly find some pocketbook populist Republicans.

So, will the Bannon insurgency therefore help the Democrats? Maybe, maybe not. That depends on what the Democrats do.

So has the ball actually been lobbed to the Missouri Democratic party, and, more importantly to Claire McCaskill? If so, what will she and they do with it? Are they capable of claiming the bold populist mantle that seems to be the garment of choice nowadays?

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • Campaign Finance: offered without further comment
  • Campaign Finance: “…and they shall sow the public right of way and all the empty lots across the land with their yard signs…”
  • What color is the sky in Denny’s (r) world?
  • Burg Resist – Defend Democracy Rally and Voter Registration Drive – Warrensburg, Missouri – October 3, 2026
  • Schmitt’s Very Bad Week

Recent Comments

Campaign Finance:… on Campaign Finance: bring a nuke…
Campaign Finance:… on Campaign Finance: Next
Steve Duane Phipps on Burg Resist – Defend Dem…
What color is the sk… on Being obtusely wrong still mak…
What color is the sk… on Justice Brett Kavanaugh…

Archives

  • October 2026
  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,090,491 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...