• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Monthly Archives: October 2014

Campaign Finance: there is a difference

06 Monday Oct 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

campaign finance, Claire McCaskill, missouri, Missouri Democratic Party, Missouri Ethics Commission

Does the junior senator from the State of Missouri do this for his party? Not that he has to.

Today, at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C000960 10/06/2014 MO DEMOCRATIC STATE COMMITTEE Claire McCaskill 1941 Spring House Dr St Louis MO 63122 United States Senate 10/3/2014 $50,000.00

[emphasis added]

That’s $390,000.00 since February, $100,000.00 in the last week.

Previously:

Campaign Finance: even more (October 2, 2014)

Campaign Finance: All in the family (July 28, 2014)

Campaign Finance: join the party (February 19, 2014)

Campaign Finance: Now we know…

06 Monday Oct 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Briam Stumpe, campaign finance, Circuit Judge, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, Republican State Leadership Committee, republicans

…who’s getting propped up.

Previously: Campaign Finance: Who is getting propped up this time? (October 3, 2014)

Today, at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C141122 10/06/2014 CITIZENS FOR STUMPE RSLC-MISSOURI PAC 1201 F ST NW STE 675 WASHINGTON DC 20004 10/4/2014 $100,000.00

[emphasis added]

Who? That passed through pretty quickly.

C141122: Citizens For Stumpe

611 East Capitol Ave Ste 1 Committee Type: Candidate

Jefferson City Mo 65101 Party Affiliation: Republican

[….] Established Date: 03/17/2014

[….]

Election History

Election Year Primary Outcome General Outcome Political Office

2014 Successful Circuit Judge Circuit 19 Division 4

[emphasis added]

For Circuit Judge in Cole County. That’s quite an infusion for a circuit judge race. Why on earth would a republican entity dump so much cash on this race?

The Circuit Court in Cole County must be a really interesting place. Heh.  

A night at the symphony

05 Sunday Oct 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Michael Brown, missouri, protest, St Louis, St. Louis Symphony

There was a protest moment at last night’s St. Louis Symphony concert:

Demonstrators interrupt St. Louis Symphony singing a ‘Requiem for Mike Brown’

Posted: Saturday, October 4, 2014 11:33 pm | Updated: 9:31 am, Sun Oct 5, 2014.

By Rebecca Rivas Of The St. Louis American

Just after intermission, about 50 people interrupted the St. Louis Symphony’s performance of Brahms Requiem on Saturday night, singing “Justice for Mike Brown.”

As symphony conductor Markus Stenz stepped to the podium to begin the second act of German Requiem, one middle-aged African-American man stood up in the middle of the theater and sang, “What side are you on friend, what side are you on…?”

[….]

…Outside, symphony administrators huddled together discussing the demonstration. When asked if they wanted to comment, they said no…

[….]

From a performing musician’s perspective – they pulled this off perfectly. It was civil disobedience (albeit for a largely sympathetic audience), yet they did not interrupt the actual performance of a great work of art (which is a sacred thing in and of itself to performing musicians), and they did so in a meaningful musical and textual manner (from a referential aesthetic viewpoint). Reading the account, some appeared to be trained musicians (pace the individual filming the smart phone video) who had prepared and executed a protest in the language and manner of the temple in the temple without disturbing the liturgy (I’m taking that analogy as far as I can, I know).

It was a powerful moment and for the most part the audience got it. The St. Louis Symphony management certainly did. They handled their response perfectly. The St. Louis Symphony is a community (the institution and its audience) and part of a larger community (the St. Louis area). The protesters put a lot of thought and preparation in this. They did so without destroying the performance of the Brahms. Members of the orchestra’s community (obviously people who are and have been in their audience in the past) shared their pain and protest in that particular venue. It was civil disobedience with panache.

As for effectiveness. We’re talking about it, aren’t we?

Is she really that stupid, or is she just betting enough MO-04 voters are?

05 Sunday Oct 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

By @BGinKC

So Rep. Vicki Hartzler has her sensible, cotton granny-panties in a twist because a Jackson County Judge read the Constitution, then read the law that barred the state from recognizing same-sex marriages that were performed in other states and, per the Full Faith and Credit Clause and the Supremacy Clause, he found the law an unconstitutional violation of the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection for all citizens.

“I am deeply disappointed that a judge has overturned the will of the Missouri people by striking down the state’s Constitutional amendment recognizing marriage as a union of one man and one woman. Missouri citizens overwhelmingly approved this amendment with 71 percent of our citizens supporting it. I look forward to this ruling being appealed to the United States Supreme Court and the right of Missouri citizens to make decisions regarding marriage policy being upheld.

Where to start?

First of all, I thank a God I’m not sure I believe in that she was elected to Congress, because this means the stupid bitch is no longer in a classroom mis-educating Missouri schoolchildren. There is your up-side to her election, I guess…that, and all the fun Charlie Pierce has had at her expense.

Second, we don’t let the majority decide on whether the minority gets equal RIGHTS. If they’re rights, they’re entitled to ’em. Case. Closed. No debate, no vote, no wait-a-secs, no caveats. No grey areas. All or nothing. In for a penny, in for a pound. Rights are rights are rights. Gay people don’t want to be treated in any special way…they want to be treated in an EQUAL way. A special right would be if they didn’t have to pay taxes. Like churches.

And third, she was in such a hurry to set her hair on fire that she got the facts wrong. Judge Youngs did not address the constitutional amendment that was part of Rove’s GOTV strategy for 2004 and enshrined that god-awful apostasy as part of our “kitchen sink” constitution, limiting his ruling to the law passed by a subsequent legislature out of pure meanness and spite, because they wanted to deny same-sex couples legally married in other states from accessing benefits such as health insurance, custody of minor children, inheritance rights, visitation rights in the hospital, end-of-life decisions…all those benefits that us straight folk take for granted but that my Uncles Billy and Richard had to form a corporation to get around over forty years ago, and that only addressed their finances.

Missouri must recognize the marriages of same-sex couples who have wed legally in other places, a state court judge ruled on Friday in the latest case to address gay rights in the United States.

Jackson County Circuit Judge J. Dale Youngs ruled that a state ban on recognition of legal same-sex marriages violated the rights of gay couples to the same protections heterosexual couples have under the U.S. Constitution.

Youngs did not address Missouri’s ban on same-sex marriage in the state, which was not part of the lawsuit brought by 10 married gay couples from Missouri.

It’s a malady common among republicans…overreach.

Of course, if she would break the binding on that pocket-Constitution she never leaves home without, she would see that the judge, being worthy of the title and his law degree, and having read the Constitution at least once – and, more importantly, having understood it – he ruled the only way he could.

You see, it’s a complex issue (most are, once you get past third grade) and the Constitution is a complex document. The Full Faith and Credit Clause (Article IV, Section I) of the Constitution reads:

Full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state. And the Congress may by general laws prescribe the manner in which such acts, records, and proceedings shall be proved, and the effect thereof.

So…it’s unconstitutional for a state to not recognize a marriage legally performed in another state. That’s black-letter law.

Now let’s have a look at the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment:

Amendment XIV

Section 1.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

That’s pretty black-letter law, too.

And the cherry on top? The Supremacy Clause

This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.

As I’ve been saying since that first “A” on a Con-Law exam…L-1ed.

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): such very important priorities

04 Saturday Oct 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

4th Congressional District, missouri, Vicky Hartzler.gay marriage

A press release from Representative Vicky Hartzler (r):

Congresswoman Hartzler reacts to ruling on Missouri’s natural marriage Constitutional amendment

Oct 4, 2014

Congresswoman Vicky Hartzler (MO-4) has issued the following statement in response to a judge’s decision muffling the voice of Missourians to determine their marriage policy

“I am deeply disappointed that a judge has overturned the will of the Missouri people by striking down the state’s Constitutional amendment recognizing marriage as a union of one man and one woman. Missouri citizens overwhelmingly approved this amendment with 71 percent of our citizens supporting it. I look forward to this ruling being appealed to the United States Supreme Court and the right of Missouri citizens to make decisions regarding marriage policy being upheld.

[….]

[emphasis in original]

A generation from now they’ll be shaking their heads over those with political agendas which included opposing gay marriage, promoting rear guard action on incandescent light bulbs, opposing universal access to health care, birtherism….

An Exchange with my Republican representative

04 Saturday Oct 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

54th Legislative District, Denny Hoskins, Medicaid expansion, missouri, Obamacare, pro-life

Tonight there is a Art Walk in my town. I went out to see what was happening and met my representative in Jefferson City, Denny Hoskins.  He will be the next Speaker Pro Tem.

I have wanted to ask him for awhile the contradiction between his position on being pro-life and his opposition to Medicaid Expansion.

Our brief exchange below the fold.

We know each.  He was going to his office, so I knew the conservation would have to be brief.

I began by confirming he is “pro-life”.  He responded that he is.

I then asked: Isn’t Medicaid expansion pro-life?

He said no.

I responded to that “no” by asking incredulously “Isn’t providing health insurance to the working poor pro-life?”

As he goes into his office he says with an ironic tone, “I thought Obamacare will save us all.”

I noted “Medicaid Expansion is Obamacare.” He repeated what he said.

I have no idea whether he is really so stupid that he doesn’t know Medicaid expansion is an important component of Obamacare or not.  He will be one of the leaders in the Missouri House.

Given how quick his response came, I suspect he is.  

Whatever his intelligence is, it seems Republicans like him will do nothing in Missouri to expand Medicaid and help Obamacare be a success.

 

Campaign Finance: Who is getting propped up this time?

04 Saturday Oct 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

campaign finance, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, PAC, republicans

Today, at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C051039 10/03/2014 RSLC-MISSOURI PAC Republican State Leadership Committee 1201 F Street, NW Suite 675 Washington DC 20004 10/3/2014 $100,000.00

[emphasis added]

That’s quite an infusion, especially when compared to what was there before:

C051039: Rslc-Missouri Pac

1800 Diagonal Road Suite 230 Committee Type: Political Action

Alexandria Va 22314

(571) 480-4860 Established Date: 02/10/2005

  Termination Date:

Information Reported On: 2014 – April Quarterly Report

Beginning Money on Hand $36.93

Monetary Receipts + $250.00

Monetary Expenditures – $62.00

Contributions Made – $0.00

Other Disbursements – $0.00

Subtotal     $188.00

Ending Money On Hand   $224.93

[emphasis added]

That’s just…impressive. Let’s take a look at the past:

RSLC [Republican State Leadership Committee]-MISSOURI PAC campaign finance reports in 2014.

Nope, not much going on there.

RSLC [Republican State Leadership Committee]-MISSOURI PAC campaign finance reports in 2013.

Nothing much to see there.

RSLC [Republican State Leadership Committee]-MISSOURI PAC campaign finance reports in 2012.

Not much there. Until right before the 2012 election:

CONTRIBUTIONS AND LOANS RECEIVED

RSLC-MISSOURI PAC [pdf] 10/29/2012

Republican State Leadership Committee 1201 F Street, NW Washington DC 20004 10/16/2012 $1,000.00

Republican State Leadership Committee 1201 F Street, NW Washington DC 20004 10/22/2012 $35,000.00

Republican State Leadership Committee 1201 F Street, NW Washington DC 20004 10/25/2012 $200,000.00

[….]

CONTRIBUTIONS MADE – SUPPLEMENTAL FORM

RSLC-MISSOURI PAC 10/29/2012

Friends of Robert Cornejo

PO Box 346

St Peters MO 63376

10/17/2012

$1,000.00

Schoeller for Missouri

PO Box 746

Willard MO 65781

10/22/2012

$25,000.00



Friends of Peter Kinder

PO Box 712

Jefferson City MO 65102

10/22/2012

$10,000.00

Schoeller for Missouri

PO Box 746

Willard MO 65781

10/25/2012

$200,000.00

[emphasis added]

Ah, they were propping up the 2012 republican Secretary of State candidate.

And they continued right through to the bitter end:

CONTRIBUTIONS AND LOANS RECEIVED

RSLC-MISSOURI PAC [pdf] 12/6/2012

Republican State Leadership Committee 1201 F Street NW Washington DC 20004 10/29/2012 $250,000.00

Republican State Leadership Committee 1201 F Street NW Washington DC 20004 10/31/2012 $50,000.00

Republican State Leadership Committee 1201 F Street NW Washington DC 20004 11/2/2012 $25,000.00

[….]

EXPENDITURES AND CONTRIBUTIONS MADE

RSLC-MISSOURI PAC 12/6/2012

C.Contributions Made (Regardless of Amount)

Schoeller for Missouri

PO Box 746

Willard MO 65781

10/29/2012

$250,000.00

Schoeller for Missouri

PO Box 746

Willard MO 65781

10/31/2012

$50,000.00

Schoeller for Missouri

PO Box 746

Willard MO 65781

11/2/2012

$25,000.00

[emphasis added]

Wow. Those last big bucks contributions were passed through faster than…

In case you’re counting, that was $550,000.00 from one entity directed to one republican statewide candidate. The grassroots just ain’t what it used to be.

Someone explain to us again why imposing campaign finance limits in Missouri is a bad idea.

So, who’s going to get propped up this time? And who’s really doing the propping?

Previously:

Campaign Finance: one last big money dump (November 5, 2012)

Campaign Finance: We got your $50,000.00 right here to make it an even half a million… (November 2, 2012)

Celebrate the grassroots! Not exactly, if you’re a republican… (October 30, 2012)

Campaign Finance: Celebrate the grassroots! (October 28, 2012)

Can you balance political harakiri against the satisfaction of slapping a fool in the face?

03 Friday Oct 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

elections, Ferguson, Keith English, missouri, Rehka Sharma, Robert McCulloch, St. Louis County Executive, Steve Stenger

In Dostoyevsky’s novel, The Idiot, one of the characters,  Nastassya, who has been seduced by a rich nobleman, is offered the chance to redeem her social standing through marriage to an ambitious young man, Ganya, whom the nobleman has offered a large sum of money to marry her. In an act of mad defiance Nastassya, in the presence of most of the individuals involved in her situation, refuses not only Ganya, but a disinterested offer of marriage from the hero, Prince Myskin, takes money offered to her by another admirer, Rogozhin, in return for the promise of her favors, throws it in the fire, telling Ganya to pull it out and take it if he wants it. She then leaves with Rogozhin, cementing her future as a demimondaine, exiled from respectable society. Through her act she denied the nobleman, Totsky, a way to escape his guilt for, in the terms of the time, “ruining” her, as well as showing up the moral emptiness of her society.

Nastassya’s grandiose, self-destructive gesture has always fascinated me. Was the momentary satisfaction worth it? She herself, after all, embraces the world view that will put her, as the mistress of Rogozhin, beyond the social pale. But powerless though she may be against the male-dominated world she lives in, she  has, nevertheless, asserted her autonomy and embraced  her destiny through her own free will.

Why am I talking about a nineteenth century novel now? In a word, Ferguson, and all the fallout thereof. If the connection doesn’t seem that obvious to you (and why should it?), just bear with me – although I may come  up short on the melodrama when compared to Dostoyevsky.

One manifestation of the Ferguson fallout is today’s news that a coalition of African-American officials in St. Louis County have decided not to support the Democratic candidate for St. Louis County Executive, Steven Stenger, but rather to endorse Republican Rick Stream. Yes, that Rick Stream. Proto-Tea Partier, pal of the corrupt, massive beneficiary of lobbyists, sharia-fearing fantasist, cut-off-your-nose-to-spite-your-face type of right-wing ideologue, etc., etc. Just the kind of guy who’ll be doing his best for the rich and powerful in St. Louis County, and to hell with the type of folks who’ve been out in the streets protesting the treatment African-Americans have received from the power structure.

But hey, it’s a poke in the eye for Steve Stenger and the Democratic aparatus that supports him, and to those doing te poking, I’m sure it feels as glorious as when Nastassa watches Ganya grovel in the fire for Rogozhin’s money. The coalition members claimed that they were angry about “what they characterized as “years and years of disrespect” by party leaders.” I’m sure that’s true. The timing of this announcement suggests, however, that Steve Stenger’s firm support of the County Prosecutor Robert McCulloch’s role in overseeing the investigation into the Michael Brown shooting may have been just one slight too many. According to one of the coalition members, “Steve Stenger’s unbreakable alignment with Bob McCulloch shows he will be unable to run the executive office independently and without influence.”

Maybe. I personally am not impressed by Stenger’s support for McCulloch which smacks of an effort to appease those folks who think a few nights of rioting in Ferguson are vastly more horrifying than the shooting of an unarmed teenager by a man entrusted with the safety of the public – and who were, no doubt, more than ready to toss a black county executive out on his backside. Nevertheless, the old cliche leaves us to believe that there is such a thing as out of the skillet and into the fire. Do these black officials really believe that Stream represents a party that will be inclined to show them much respect in the long run? Do they really think that he’d abandon McCulloch if given his druthers – no matter what  he might say behind closed doors?

But don’t get me wrong. I’m not criticizing these folks. If I had the wherewithal, I’d be willing to jump from my own skillet into the GOP fire. For me the target would be Rep. Keith English (D-68), the SOB who sold out his party and gave legislative Republicans the last vote they needed to override Governor Nixon’s veto and enact SB509, a rich-man’s tax cut that has the potential to wreck the state’s social and economic infrastructure. That’s not all. He’s a real piece of the smelly stuff. He has, for instance, played an active role in the Missouri front of what is usually a strictly GOP war on female reproductive choice. In 2013 he brought SB298 to the floor of the Missouri House, a bill that would “require an ultrasound to be conducted and reviewed with the pregnant woman prior to the 24-hour waiting period for an abortion.” A real sweetheart for sure.

English was unopposed in last month’s primary and will likely win another term in the legislature. While, as I indicated above, he’s bad news, I do have to admit that he probably has the potential to vote occasionally in ways that are preferable to  his Republican opponent, Rehka (Becky) Sharma. He’s been a reliable vote for labor in the past. Nevertheless, what he did in regard to SB298 is so egregiously bad that if it were up to me, he’d be exiled to the ninth ring of Hell.

Since I don’t live in the 68th district, English isn’t really my direct problem. But, while I don’t think I could tell people they should vote for Sharma, I couldn’t tell them to “suck it up” and vote for English either, which is almost as bad as voting directly for the Republican. So, I do understand just why the anti-Stenger officials have done what they did, and while I wish they were better, smarter than me, I can’t condemn them. I’d love to see Keith English burning in Hell and if they’d like to see Stenger twist and turn a little, I can’t play holier than thou.

And if, because we’re self-indulgent, we, in our little ways, help hand the state over to the GOP wrecking crew, to borrow an image from Thomas Frank, maybe it’ll be all for the best in the end. Maybe the sooner the Republicans take us the full Kansas route, the sooner Missourians will throw the clowns out. There was no happy ending for Nastassya, but, perhaps the inevitable, crashing right-wing failure will be enough to finally put Missouri back on the right track – even though we’ll all have to pay dearly for the nasty little detour we will have taken.

* First sentence of 5th paragraph amended slightly for clarity.

Campaign Finance: still in

03 Friday Oct 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

2016, 2104, Attorney General, campaign finance, Chris Koster, governor, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, State Auditor, Tom Schweich

Governor, 2016.

Today, at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C111150 10/02/2014 FRIENDS OF TOM SCHWEICH Missouri Club for Growth PO Box 2068 Saint Louis MO 63158 9/30/2014 $30,000.00

As if he really needs any of it. For 2014.

An end of the quarter flurry:

C031159 10/02/2014 MISSOURIANS FOR KOSTER MHA Political Action Committee for Health (HEALTHPAC) PO Box 60 Jefferson City MO 65102 9/30/2014 $10,000.00

C031159 10/02/2014 MISSOURIANS FOR KOSTER Smithfield Foods, Inc. PO Box 9004 Smithfield VA 23431 9/30/2014 $20,000.00

C031159 10/02/2014 MISSOURIANS FOR KOSTER Thompson Coburn LLP One US Bank Plaza Saint Louis MO 63101 9/30/2014 $20,000.00

C031159 10/02/2014 MISSOURIANS FOR KOSTER Steven Craig 1 Oceancrest Newport Coast CA 92657 Craig Realty Group President 9/30/2014 $25,000.00

C031159 10/02/2014 MISSOURIANS FOR KOSTER Robert D Millstone PO Box 16070 Saint Louis MO 63105 Millstone Company Real Estate Owner 9/30/2014 $10,000.00

They have no doubts whatsoever.

Campaign Finance: countering an existential threat – part 2

03 Friday Oct 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

campaign finance, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission

Today, in the flurry of end of the quarter campaign contributions reported to the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C091246 10/02/2014 CITIZENS TO ELECT PAUL CURTMAN Missouri Club For Growth P.O. Box 2068 St Louis MO 63158 9/30/2014 $10,000.00

[emphasis added]

Was that really necessary? Depends on your world view.

Previously:

Campaign Finance: countering an existential threat (September 19, 2014)

When you spend your time in the General Assembly tilting at right wingnut windmills like Agenda 21, Sharia Law, and Nullification you don’t have a lot of time to tend to the nuts and bolts of grassroots campaign fundraising. And woe to you if you have an opponent in the general election….

…generous donors come to the rescue to help make the Missouri General Assembly safe for continued useless right wingnut paranoid legislation…

Because your opponent in the general election has raised practically nothing.

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • “NO” on congressional district gerrymandering – Proposition A – we get mail
  • How’s that Russian diesel working out for you?
  • The birds return
  • Denny Hoskins (r): keep stepping on that Fascist rake
  • Campaign Finance: – no quarter – “NO” on Amendment 3

Recent Comments

“NO” on… on Denny Hoskins (r): keep steppi…
“NO” on… on Justice Brett Kavanaugh…
“NO” on… on HB 1: Gerrymander this
Denny Hoskins (r): k… on Campaign Finance: “NO…
Denny Hoskins (r): k… on Salus populi suprema lex esto

Archives

  • October 2026
  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,096,082 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...