• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Monthly Archives: September 2008

Advanced Thumb Sucking

28 Sunday Sep 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

missouri, Rush Limbaugh, Truth Squad

One of my political acquaintances shows more grit than I do. She listens to Rush Limbaugh. I lack the mettle for such cultural slumming.

We could have a contest: name one person or group that has ever dispensed more hocus pocus in high falutin’ terms to the already stupid masses than our own native son. Limbaugh founded the Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies. To use a term like Advanced Conservative Studies is as nonsensical as promoting Advanced Thumb Sucking.

What would you learn at the Institute? Gems like this one? “There are more acres of forestland in America today than when Columbus discovered the continent in 1492.”

Now we come to the dilemma always faced by progressives: how to deal with liars like Rush. Tell a few whoppers yourself? Nah, they got forty years practice on us. And anyway, it would be immoral.

But merely telling the truth doesn’t always get the job done. Truth lacks the drama of lies. Obama’s latest gambit at controlling Republican lies in Missouri is the Barack Obama Truth Squad. Obama has asked prominent Missouri Democrats to make it their business to publicly refute ads that lie or mislead people.  

RBH pointed out that Matt Blunt is moaning about the Big Brother state that Obama’s Truth Squad exemplifies:

The group includes prosecutors from St. Louis (Robert P. McCulloch), Dunklin (Steve Sokoloff), Lafayette (Page Bellamy), Cass (Teresa Hensley), Clay (Dan White), Ripley (Chris Miller), Audrain (Jason Lamb) and Jackson (Jim Kanatzar) counties volunteering to be surrogates for Obama on their own time.

Blunt’s accusation that the prosecutors will take Republican ad makers to court is itself a lie. Prominent Democrats on the squad are simply working on their own time to get the truth out there. And what’s more, that’s nothing more than what McCain’s campaign has done:

By the way, a quick surf of the Internet found a McCain Truth Squad in New Hampshire, formed last January, that included several public officials with prosecutorial powers, including the state attorney general.

Considering the number of lies Obama faces from Republicana (including Rush and McCain’s own “truth squads”), RBH summed it up: “[W]e need a lot of people to tell the truth.”

One-term Blunt brings out his tinfoil beanie

28 Sunday Sep 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 4 Comments

Lame duck Governor Matt Blunt took time out from his schedule to present a conspiracy theory (and he used your money to do it too):

Gov. Matt Blunt and Republicans are accusing Barack Obama’s campaign of assembling a “truth squad” with law enforcement officials to intimidate Obama critics from speaking out against the Democratic presidential candidate.

Yet a top Republican National Committee official admits the Democratic prosecutors from across Missouri “haven’t specifically said” they would use their prosecutorial powers on Obama’s behalf.

A little more on Matt Blunt’s hysterical overreaction under the fold.

But even the Springfield media can’t resist hitting the hometown boy on this inane attack.

Using his taxpayer-funded press office to level a political attack, Blunt issued a statement Saturday to denounce the unproven allegations.

In case you were wondering who was in the dreaded corps of people causing Matt Blunt to weep and gnash his teeth..

The group includes prosecutors from St. Louis (Robert P. McCulloch), Dunklin (Steve Sokoloff), Lafayette (Page Bellamy), Cass (Teresa Hensley), Clay (Dan White), Ripley (Chris Miller), Audrain (Jason Lamb) and Jackson (Jim Kanatzar) counties volunteering to be surrogates for Obama on their own time.

Now, leaving aside easy jokes about the indictment-ripe Blunt being scared of multiple prosecutors. Should these guys just not mention that they hold elective office? Anyways, with the legions of lies about Obama, we need a lot of people to tell the truth.

Governor, stop whining, and don’t let the door hit you on the way out.

Signs, signs, everywhere signs, part 2

28 Sunday Sep 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

Obama, sign

Yeah, I’ve previously written about these peculiar accouterments of a modern American campaign: Signs, signs, everywhere signs

I can’t help it. As one commenter wrote earlier, it’s like junk food for a campaign.

An Obama/Biden 4 x 8 sign at an undisclosed location. Let’s see how long it lasts before the usual vandals do it in.

I was manning the front desk at our local headquarters early this morning when a volunteer from a neighboring county walked up and said, “I’m here to deliver the signs.” Lo and behold, they were Obama/Biden 4 x 8s. We unloaded them in the midst of the gathering of volunteers for the canvassing of 100,000 Missouri doors.

There was some kind of touristy event downtown today. The streets were awash in pedestrians. Our doors were open at Democratic headquarters. People walked in – and they wanted signs, buttons, t-shirts, and hats.

One lady walked in and asked me if she could get an Obama cap. I told her that they were fifteen bucks a piece. She replied, “I didn’t ask you that. Are you saying you think I can’t afford it?” “No ma’am.” She bought the cap.

People walking by saw the 4 x 8 Obama signs stacked inside. Like moths to the flame they were drawn into headquarters. “How much are those big signs?” “Do you have a location for them?”

One older gentleman wanted every Democratic candidate’s sign. He had a rural location. He expressed his disdain for all things republican in strongly articulated earthy language. We ended up putting the first Obama 4 x 8 on his property.

The walk in traffic at headquarters was constant and massive today. “Do you have t-shirts?” “Do you have yard signs?” “Do you have bumper stickers?”

Those 300 Obama/Biden yard signs we got in this past week? They’re all gone.

Obama campaign – 100,000 doors in Missouri today

27 Saturday Sep 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

door to door, missouri, Obama

The first morning canvass group had already gone out. This was a second larger morning group as they received their instructions and assignments from the local field organizer. Afternoon canvas groups were also scheduled for Warrensburg.

A canvasser related that a child at one door said:

“We’re for Obama. We’re not for McCain. Do you want to know why? He has a friend. A friend named Bush.”

SurveyUSA poll: Missouri governor head to head – September '08

27 Saturday Sep 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 5 Comments

Tags

2008, governor, Jay Nixon, Kenny Hulshof, poll, Survey USA

SurveyUSA released a 705 sample poll of “likely voters” in Missouri on September 25th which was in the field from September 23rd through the 24th. The poll runs head to head match ups in the governor race between Attorney General Jay Nixon (D) and Kenny Hulshof (r) (and the two leading other minor party candidates on the ballot). The margin of error is 3.8%.

The poll was sponsored by KCTV in Kansas City.

Missouri voters will also elect a Governor. If the election for Governor were today, would you vote for (choices rotated) Republican Kenny Hulshof? Democrat Jay Nixon? Libertarian Andrew Finkenstadt? Or Constitution Party candidate Gregory Thompson?

All

Kenny Hulshof (R) – 37%

Jay Nixon (D)- 55%

Andrew Finkenstadt (L) – 2%

Gregory Thompson (CP) – 2%

Undecided – 5%

Some of the crosstabs:

Party Affiliation

Democrats [38% of sample]

Kenny Hulshof (R) – 11%

Jay Nixon (D) – 83%

Andrew Finkenstadt (L) – 1%

Gregory Thompson (CP) – 2%

Undecided – 3%

republicans [32% of sample]

Kenny Hulshof (R) – 72%

Jay Nixon (D) – 23%

Andrew Finkenstadt (L) – 1%

Gregory Thompson (CP) – 2%

Undecided – 2%

Independents [23% of sample]

Kenny Hulshof (R) – 34%

Jay Nixon (D) – 49%

Andrew Finkenstadt (L) – 6%

Gregory Thompson (CP) – 2%

Undecided – 9%

Gender

Male [50% of sample]

Kenny Hulshof (R) – 39%

Jay Nixon (D) – 53%

Andrew Finkenstadt (L) – 4%

Gregory Thompson (CP) – 2%

Undecided – 3%

Female [50% of sample]

Kenny Hulshof (R) – 35%

Jay Nixon (D) – 56%

Andrew Finkenstadt (L) – 1%

Gregory Thompson (CP) – 2%

Undecided – 7%

Not much of a gender gap. Then again, when you’re down by 18 points forty or so days out all the “sub-gaps” get subsumed by stark reality.

RIP Paul Newman

27 Saturday Sep 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Paul Newman

Paul Newman died last night at age 83 after a battle with long cancer. He leaves behind Joanne Woodward, his wife of five decades, which seems impossible in the Hollywood of today. He also leaves us behind the memory of a long career as a film star, philanthropist, and progressive activist.

I loved Paul Newman. He could play hero, anti-hero, and villain with an equal measure of irresistible charm, sometimes all in the same movie. From HUD, where he played a greedy, self-centered rancher, to The Hustler, where as Fast Eddy Felson he created a role so memorable he won an Oscar for the reprise twenty years later, and so many more, he performed with an intensity that went far beyond his piercing blue eyes, which a lesser actor could easily have coasted on for a decade or more.

Not only was he one of my favorite actors of all-time, he was a longtime progressive. As a vocal opponent of the Vietnam War and supporter of Gene McCarthy, he was officially on Nixon’s enemies list. He’s spoken out against war, for gay rights, and he’s endowed an annual award to writers who use their writing to defend the First Amendment.

Newman built up a food empire with Newman’s Own that has given millions to charity, and recently he gave his shares in the company, valued at over $120 million, to charitable causes. He’s been a longtime supporter of progressive Democrats and progressive institutions like the Nation. And here he is 2006 at it again, aged 81, supporting Ned Lamont against Joe Lieberman.

It’s truly a sad day for all of us.

'Obsession' movie blowback: Huge outpouring of reader revulsion

27 Saturday Sep 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 3 Comments

Hundreds of complaints, over fifty cancelled subscriptions to the North Carolina News and Observer, public editor criticizes own newspaper for accepting hatemongering video without first identifying who produced it.

‘Obsession’ was produced by The Clarion Fund. Three of the founders of The Clarion Fund, which is responsible for this movie, are leaders or employees in an extremist group called Aish Hatorah that has been identified on Rick Ross’ Cult Watch website as a cult. For more information about it, who the group is and why it is accurate to call it a cult, go to www.progressiveislam.info and search for Aish Hatorah.

Ted Vaden, the public editor at the North Carolina News and Observer writes:

Should The News & Observer allow itself to be used as a vehicle for disseminating offensive speech against a religious faith?

No, was the resounding response from readers who objected to a DVD that was distributed in The N&O last weekend. The video, titled “Obsession,” portrays radical Islam as an organized global terrorism campaign aimed at Jews, Christians and America.

It depicts armies of jihadist warriors, suicide bombers in training and armed children chanting anti-Western slogans. Images of Islamist militants are juxtaposed with scenes of goose-stepping Nazi troopers. Graphic footage displays carnage from attacks in New York, London and Madrid.

“This is a film about a radical world view and the threat it poses to us all, Muslim and non-Muslim alike,” a title says at the beginning of the video.

After the DVD was distributed Sept. 13, protests poured into News & Observer offices. We received at least 300 e-mail and phone messages, and about 50 people canceled subscriptions

“By taking responsibility for the delivery of this movie, an esteemed newspaper lent credence and stature to a movie which is, at best, hyperbolic, frightening propaganda. Surely, money cannot replace ethics,” wrote reader MARY HARRISON.

“Gee, if I was still teaching, this video could be a classroom aid to show how some use hate and religious intolerance to scare people,” wrote retired fourth-grade teacher MARY GILBERT of Raleigh. “However, I would not want to poison young minds by having them watch it.”

The DVD was distributed by The N&O as an advertising product, inserted along with the advertising circulars into the paper. Jim McClure, vice president for display advertising, said he recognized that the DVD would be controversial and consulted with other executives before accepting it.

But he concluded that the paper should not deny advertisers the opportunity to reach the N&O audience because their message is unpopular or offensive to some. “The ultimate question is, at what point do you draw the line and start censoring things based on comfort level?” he said.

Many readers, citing The N&O’s well-publicized revenue problems, accused the paper of selling out scruples for advertising dollars. McClure said the paper doesn’t disclose what customers pay for ads, because they expect confidentiality for competitive reasons, but money was not a factor: “There was no consideration that this was so lucrative that we have to lower our standards and accept this. It was accepted on its merits.”

….

I have a problem with this particular entry into the free-speech marketplace, because we don’t know where the speech is coming from. The DVD package contained a name and address for the sponsor, The Clarion Fund of New York City. A Clarion Web site gives no information about its directors or its funding. It says the film was made possible by a large donor, but doesn’t identify who.

Omid Safi, a professor of Islamic studies at UNC-CH, has researched the video and the Clarion Fund. He says the producer of the video is a Canadian native who now is a rabbi and Zionist leader in Israel. Distribution was aided by a Christian Zionist organization headed by Texas evangelist John Hagee, he said, and a Clarion Fund Web site recently published, then removed, an article that endorsed John McCain over Barack Obama for president.

Safi noted that the DVD was placed in newspapers only in key election swing states, suggesting it’s intended to scare voters into the McCain camp. “The whole premise of this film is that the West doesn’t know what radical Islam represents,” Safi said. “Fair enough. Tell us what you represent.” My calls to the Clarion Fund were not returned.

I think newspapers have an obligation to be as transparent as possible with readers about the information they provide. In this case, I think the DVD fell short in two respects.

First, it should have been labeled as paid advertising content, as the newspaper would require of a political advertisement. Despite the story on the front page, it’s clear from their comments that some readers perceived the video as somehow endorsed by The N&O. McClure said it’s the first time he could recall that The N&O has distributed a DVD.

More important is the lack of information about the source of this controversial content. Without that, the readers were not in a position to make an informed judgment about the message they received.

Story here.

Letter to the editor responses to ‘Obsession’ movie

From the Lansing (MI) State Journal

DVD Drives Away Reader



I found a CD, “Obsession: Radical Islam’s War Against the West,” tucked into my Sept. 14 LSJ.

Its packaging boldly claimed, “As seen on CNN and FOX News by more than 20 million viewers worldwide.”

I am distressed that the LSJ would distribute such inflammatory, fear-coddling material. I am disappointed that Lansing’s newspaper has become an extension of CNN and FOX News. I am saddened that the LSJ is unable to distinguish journalism from jingoism.

As a nation and as a people, we are greater than this hate-mongering. We are capable of finding other more constructive ways to address extremism and inequity, nationally and globally. Showcasing war, demonizing “the enemy,” and presenting the world in “us vs. them” terms, feeds continual hate, misery, and arms sales – not security.

The LSJ has been shrinking in size. It has now shrunk beyond any recognition as a responsible newspaper. Cancel my subscription.

Laura B. DeLind

Mason

______________

Who’s Behind DVDs?

I just received a DVD in that could potentially fuel anti-Muslim hate in the community.

This is a time when every well-meaning individual, regardless of religious or ethnic background, is trying to foster an atmosphere of unity and understanding amongst various diverse groups that make up America. This really prompts me to want to ask the following questions:

Why does the LSJ believe it is appropriate to profit from this kind of hate message? Who actually paid for these to be distributed and how much did it cost? Would you have distributed a similar hate DVD from a racist group, whether white, black, Hispanic, Asian, etc.?

Now, does sending out the DVD in key election swing states have to do with putting a candidate at an advantage? I trust I’d get a response to these questions.

Muideen Kareem

East Lansing

______________

LSJ Wrong On DVD

The inclusion of the anti-Muslim DVD, “Obsession” in the Sept. 14 LSJ does a gross disservice to our community. While radicals may claim affiliation with any religious group, their true culture is one of intolerance and violence. By contrast, Islam is known as a religion that values peace and equilibrium above all else.

Look at Eric Robert Rudolph, identified with the group Christian Identity, who was responsible for the bombing at the 1996 Atlanta Olympics that killed two and injured 111.

How about Timothy McVeigh? Raised as a Catholic, he killed 168 and injured an additional 800 persons in a domestic terrorism attack on the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City.

Would the LSJ have distributed a DVD that offers these two as pr
oof that Christian extremists are mounting a threat to America?

At the very least, it should have been incumbent upon the LSJ to seek to identify The Clarion Fund or its financial backers before accepting its 30 pieces of silver to sell out Lansing’s Islamic Community.

Michael Forman

East Lansing

______________

LSJ Delivers Fear

When I opened my Sunday paper on Sept. 14, I found the glossy insert, “Obsession.” This gift was not a perfume sample. It was a DVD of a movie whose subtitle read “radical Islam’s war against the west.” It was produced by the Clarion Fund (http://clarionfund.org), a nonprofit organization “whose mission is to educate Americans about issues of national security.” Perhaps.

But, the timing of this “gift,” the pivotal role that Michigan will play in the November election and the film’s shadowy funding suggest the hands of the well-financed, pro-war backers of John McCain – whether McCain himself approves or not. This is the politics of fear, pure and simple.

This is also the Gannett Company, the LSJ’s parent, taking a back-handed partisan position in the election. I wonder if they would circulate a free movie that questioned the global war on terror, even if they were paid.

Subscribers and voters, back to you.

Jack Smith

Williamston

______________

From the Des Moines Register

Who’s really behind this propaganda?

The DVD enclosed in Sunday’s Register contains 60 minutes of propaganda aimed at convincing the viewer that “radical Islam” threatens everyone in our country and that very nearly everyone in Muslim countries grows up learning the beliefs of “radical Islam.”

Though several people are named as responsible for making, manufacturing and mailing the DVD, in spite of a strenuous search on the Internet, I learned almost nothing about the executive producer (Peter Mier), the director (Wayne Kopping) and the Clarion Fund Inc., the nonprofit that apparently sponsored the DVD and seems to exist only as a street address in New York and as a 501c(3) with no disclosed source of funding.

What did the Register ask to know about the Clarion Fund Inc. before agreeing to insert the DVD?

-Mark Kane, Des Moines

___________________________

DVD sought to sow fear in the electorate

I am incredibly disappointed in the Register for serving as the delivery agent for “jihad Swift Boating” by including the DVD “Obsession” in the Sept. 14 edition. I watched it in its entirety.

This DVD connects modern Jihadi to Nazi Germany ideologues. It attempts to scare us into a paranoiac approach to our place in the world.

While I do not deny that terrorism is a real threat, and feel strongly that we must all prepare to deal with it, this is a blatant attempt to frighten us into our own brand of Western militancy. The last eight years of the Bush doctrine have taught us the consequences of stirring the hornets’ nest of militant Islam in the Middle East. Saber rattling, “shock and awe” and cowboy diplomacy have only fueled hatred of the United States in the Islamic world and threatened our long-term security here at home.

The fact that this DVD, which was produced in 2006, should be released with less than two months before our national election and that it should be targeted for newspapers in swing states is a thinly veiled ploy to frighten the electorate into voting for the perceived “party most likely to protect us.”

I shouldn’t be surprised that the Republicans are willing to stoop to frightening footage to secure votes. I had not thought the Register would serve as the delivery boy for Jihad hysteria.

– James L. Fritz, Decorah

___________________________

Newspaper insert was vicious propaganda

When I opened the Register this past Sunday to find a hateful insult to Islam, a decent and humane religion, inserted in the paper under the guise of advertising, I felt angry, hurt, violated and disgusted. I am ashamed of the Register, which claims to be “The Newspaper Iowa Depends Upon.” Upon which groups will you next release such viciousness?

I had a long chat with your advertising manager and have been advised that the decision to allow this material into the paper was collective, that it took place at many levels of your corporation and that it was a difficult decision. Respectfully, I have to say that I disagree that the decision was so difficult. The ethical line you crossed was as bright as the sun and as wide as day.

I have read the Register for 17 years and have never seen in any publication, short of the neo-Nazi papers that used to get shoved in our mailbox in Pennsylvania during the ’60s, such disregard for the difference between propaganda and information. Your paper is responsible for the latter: Let the slimy characters who vend this other stuff pay for their own paper. Don’t sully your reputation, my home and the idea of responsible free speech in a democracy.

– David Devonis, Davis City

___________________________

From Denver Post readers

“It was a shock to receive that in my newspaper,” said Priscilla Linsley of Denver. “It is wrong to distribute hateful information on Islam.”

Sherryl Weston of Westcloud Consulting teaches multiculturalism at Colorado universities. She said the DVD baits people to be anti-Muslim. “The newspaper is not the place for it,” Weston said. “It’s not news. It’s not an ad. It’s propaganda.”

“How do newspapers justify the right to profit from anti-Muslim hate speech?” asked Imam Ibrahim Kazerooni of the Islamic Center of Al-Beit in Lakewood. “Would newspapers have done the same if the materials had been anti-Semitic?”

FEC inquiry initiated into group that sent hatemongering anti-Muslim movie to Missouri homes

27 Saturday Sep 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

“American voters deserve to know whether they are the targets of a multimillion-dollar campaign funded and directed by a foreign group seeking to whip up anti-Muslim hysteria as a way to influence the outcome of our presidential election.”

Hi,

I blog at www.Progressiveislam.info, another progressive politics-interested blog on the Soapblox platform. I’m posting this story at Show Me because yours was one of the swing states targeted for distribution of the warmongering, hatemongering, DVD ‘Obsession,’ which is essentially an attempt to demogogue people into voting for McCain by inciting fear and alarm against Muslims. If you know someone who has seen this movie and been affected by it, checkout the second article in this blog post (Do-it-yourself guide to deconstructing responses to Republican’s new anti-Muslim video, ‘Obsession’) to talk them down from whatever tizzy the movie may have put them into.

I’m also going to put up a separate post of the overwhelmingly negative responses from newspaper subscribers who received the DVD. Thanks!

The movie was distributed in the Springfield News-Leader. Teh St. Louis Post-Dispatch refused the DVD. Story here.

From Associated Press (link below excerpt):

A U.S. Muslim advocacy group Tuesday asked the Federal Election Commission to investigate whether a nonprofit group that distributed a controversial DVD about Islam in newspapers nationwide is a “front” for an Israel-based group with a stealth goal of helping Republican presidential candidate John McCain.

The DVDs – which critics call anti-Muslim propaganda – were inserted this month into more than 70 newspapers and paid for by the Clarion Fund, a nonprofit founded in 2006. The group’s focus is “the most urgent threat of radical Islam.” It has declined to identify board members or its funding.

….

In its complaint, CAIR cites New York Secretary of State records showing that three people who incorporated Clarion Fund also are employees or have been employees of Aish HaTorah International, a Jerusalem-based Jewish educational organization that has offices around the world.

“American voters deserve to know whether they are the targets of a multimillion-dollar campaign funded and directed by a foreign group seeking to whip up anti-Muslim hysteria as a way to influence the outcome of our presidential election,” Nihad Awad, executive director of CAIR, said in a statement.

As evidence of a McCain bias, CAIR cites a story in the Patriot News of Harrisburg, Pa., which reported that a Clarion Fund Web site ran a pro-McCain article before it attracted notice and was taken down.

“If you heighten the hysteria over national security or terrorism or do anything to make people more fearful, it’s clear they would trend toward McCain because that’s been his mantra throughout the campaign,” said Ibrahim Hooper, a CAIR spokesman.

Under federal election law and the tax code, nonprofit groups are restricted from getting involved in candidate races and foreign nationals may not contribute to American campaigns. The DVD’s distributors say their efforts are issue-based and don’t break election laws.

The Canadian producer of the film, Raphael Shore, is a full-time employee of Aish HaTorah International, an educational group that avoids politics, said Ronn Torossian, a New York-based spokesman for the group. Shore’s work on the DVD project was not done under the banner of Aish HaTorah, Torossian said.

“These are independent activities of individuals,” he said.

Gregory Ross, spokesman for the New York-based Clarion Fund, declined to discuss the complaint’s specifics. He pointed out that it’s normal for nonprofits to keep donors’ identities private. He said the group has “thousands of donors that span the political spectrum.”

“We are not telling people who to vote for,” said Ross, a former employee of Aish HaTorah International. “We’re just saying no matter who gets in office, the American people should know radical Islam is a real threat to America. We don’t feel radical Islam is getting its fair share of press.”

The group is preparing to release another film, “Third Jihad,” but has no plans for mass distribution, Ross said.

Story here.

For complete background on the Aish Hatorah cult, including an expose on how Aish Hatorah targets secular Jews and misrepresents themselves in doing so to gain access and trust to groom them for extremism, as well as media stories showing the links of the hatemongering ‘Obsession’ movie to top leaders in the cult’s group, check out www.Progressiveislam.info.

Do-it-yourself guide to deconstructing responses to Republican’s new anti-Muslim video, ‘Obsession’

By FATEMAH KESHAVARZ

If you have received a hair-raising “documentary” called Obsession in the mail this weekend, you are not a chosen surprise winner, or the recipient of a kind anonymous gift. You belong to a sought after group of people: the residents of a swing state estimated to be an undecided voter. The film is supposed to convince you that your country is at war with the majority of Muslims who are willing to conquer America, kill or convert you, and establish a fascist empire. If you watch the film by yourself, and have no way of evaluating its content, chances are you will be convinced. Rather, you will be terrified.

That 28 million free copies of Obsession is landing on doorsteps in swing states at this point in time, speaks for itself. Nonetheless, people are digging deep in search of the sources of financial support for this largest campaign of fear conducted to date. I’d say more power to them for their efforts to expose this campaign of emotional manipulation reminiscent of fascist like ideologies that have resulted in massive human tragedies.  For now, however, there are easier and more practical ways of countering this scare attack. As a Muslim who has never been at war with anyone, I list five of them here.

First, the movie tells you that in a Muslim country, a non-Muslim is supposed to be killed or sold like an animal. Look, in your neighborhood or among colleague, relatives, and friends, for an ordinary fellow American who has travelled to a Muslim country in recent years. Ask if he or she felt the threat of being abducted, converted, sold, or killed at anytime during his or her stay in that country.

Second, the Movie claims that the Egyptian textbooks tell school children that Muslims should kill non-Muslims and take over the world. Egypt has millions of Coptic Christian inhabitants. In fact, they form 20% of the Egyptian population. Ask yourself how have they survived living in Egypt for thousands of years? Then, locate an Egyptian Copt through your local library, university, the internet, and/or friends. Ask that person if he or she ever saw such a statement in his or his children’s school books.

Third, invite a Persian speaking friend (of whom hundreds of thousands live in the U.S.) to watch the movie with you. When supposed scenes from the Iranian TV are shown, they will tell you that the actual language they hear is not Persian but Arabic. The documentary makers did not know what they were piecing together. They banked on the fact that the audience will not know that either.

Fourth, the film interviews supposed Muslim fundamentalists who have turned nice, loving, and truthful after conversion to Christianity.  Ask yourself why you should trust them anymore now than when they were ruthless terrorists – if indeed they were terrorists. If not, why are they lying?

Fifth, when images of large and loud crowds in the film frighten you, imagine someone taking a few shots from the GOP convention’s loud chants, put a scary voice over, add a few shots of American soldiers brea
king into Iraqi homes in the middle of the night, and throw a few statements from right wing shows into the mix.  It could be sold to Muslim audiences as “The American War on Islam.”

Finally, please send this simple guide to a friend who has been terrified after watching Obsession and tell them to vote for Mr. McCain only if they like four more years of what they have experienced for the past eight years…not because Muslims are at war with America. They are not.

Fatemeh Keshavarz is Chair of the Department of Asian and Near Eastern Languages and Literature at Washington University and the author of Jasmine and Stars: Reading more than Lolita in Tehran.

Presidential debate open thread

27 Saturday Sep 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 17 Comments

Tags

McSame, Obama

Is it just me, or does McSame sound every other republican talking point spouting candidate? “Liberal!” “Tax and spend! Tax and spend!” “Drill baby, drill!” “Health insurance is only for those who can afford it and don’t need it!”

Oi vay. “We’re mavericks!”

This is an open thread.

Update:

Yeah, I should have watched McSame’s train wreck instead of just listening.

Joe Biden has the skill of a trained surgeon with a scalpel and the impact of a lumberjack with a chainsaw. Heh.

Sandra Aust: an experienced greenhorn

27 Saturday Sep 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

missouri, Sandra Aust

As of thirty days after the primary, Republican state senator LuAnn Ridgeway had $374,000 in her re-election war chest. Her opponent, Sandra Aust, as of the same date, had $130,000. Ouch. Same old, same old. Our gal has the goods, but their gal has the goodies.

Not to worry, says Aust. For someone who’s 144,000 bucks short of parity, she exudes confidence. She believes she’s going to boot that voucher-loving minion of Rex Sinquefield out of Jeff City. She jumps to point that out about Ridgeway, that LuAnn took $100,000 from Sinquefield. Hey, no wonder the Republican is ahead in the money game.

But Sinqufield lucre doesn’t play well in SD 17. Its history is Democratic.

Clay County contains a large chunk of Kansas City, and this particular chunk is a little bit of heaven. The schools are AAA+, and the area, ten minutes from downtown K.C., is one of the fastest growing counties in the country, the fastest growing county in Missouri. Forty percent of its residents didn’t even live here in 2000.

These people love their schools … and Ridgeway sponsored–not voted for, sponsored–voucher legislation. What the … ?! How did she even sneak into office? Aust says Ridgeway’s election in 2004 was a fluke, just one of those weird Republican years when a district that usually goes Democratic voted for Matt Blunt and George Bush. Ridgeway got past Philip Willoughby 52.8 percent to 47.2 percent.

But the folks in SD 17 are usually moderate to progressive. They voted for Claire over Talent, for stem cell research, for the tobacco tax, and–by 76 percent–for the minimum wage increase. They went for Democratic governors in three out of the last four contests. So Aust is looking at the history of the district and saying that these voters are ready to come to their senses.  

Aust is part of a team of campaigners who are coaxing voters to return to the Democratic fold. The coordinated campaign, with a cadre of volunteers, works for Obama, Nixon, Barnes, Aust, and state rep candidates Josh Reed and Terry Stone. Aust says that Jay Nixon has commented more than once that Clay County has the best Democratic committee and organization of any county in the state.

Sandra gets wound up about the Democratic message. She’s a nurse, one of five running for the legislature this year, and she has ideas about how to save money in our health care system. She cites a health care company that did a two-year study in the late nineties on caring for pneumonia patients in their homes instead of for 11-14 days in the hospital. Every patient who was treated at home was healed and had no recurrence of the disease. Not only did that save thousands of dollars per patient, but patients weren’t at risk for the secondary infections people commonly pick up in hospitals. A program like that, which could serve as a model for treating other diseases, saved tens of thousands of dollars. As a senator, she would encourage such programs, thus saving many Medicaid dollars as well as saving money when people’s hospital benefits run out and the rest of us end up taking up the slack.

Aust wants more nurse based clinics and nurse practitioners in under served areas, and figures that if all five candidates who are nurses win and if Sam Page, a physician, can snag the Lt. Gov.’s seat, those kinds of solutions will stand a chance.

When you listen to her sounding off, you know you’re hearing a practiced campaigner. Except she’s not. She’s never run for office before. You read that right. She has served on the Parks Board in Kansas City under Mayor Barnes, where she gained experience in governance, learning about balancing a budget and contracting for new roads. She was treasurer and outreach coordinator for the MO Coalition for Lifesaving Cures, fundraising and traveling to nooks and crannies of the state most of us haven’t heard of, preaching the facts about stem cell research.

So Aust isn’t light on experience, just new to being a candidate. But she takes to it like an old hand.

If gaining another senate seat appeals to you, go drop some change in the kitty for Sandra Aust.

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • Campaign Finance: keep it coming
  • Campaign Finance: “Welcome to the party, pal”
  • Joined at the hip
  • What a friend we have in Donald (r), and Betsy, and…
  • Campaign Finance: they ain’t playing around

Recent Comments

Uh, in case you were… on Some right wingnuts with money…
Winning at losing… on Passing the gas – Donald…
TACO Tuesday | Show… on TACO or Mushrooms?
TACO Tuesday | Show… on So much winning
So much winning | Sh… on Passing the gas – Donald…

Archives

  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,051,473 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...