• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Tag Archives: committee hearing

HJR 54 – just another right wingnut abortion ban – submitted testimony

06 Thursday Feb 2025

Posted by Michael Bersin in Missouri General Assembly, Missouri House

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

abortion, Amendment 3, anti-choice, committee hearing, General Assembly, HJR 54, missouri, right wingnut, submitted testimony, women's health care, women's reproductive health

HJR 54 is an attempt to overturn the voters’ approval of Amendment 3 in the November general election – abortion rights now in the Missouri Constitution [Bill of Rights – Section 36].

“Reasons women get abortions…”

103rd General Assembly, 1st Regular Session
HJR 54 Proposes a constitutional amendment establishing provisions relating to reproductive health care
Sponsor: Stinnett, Melanie (133)
Proposed Effective Date: 8/28/2025
LR Number: 1890H.01I
Last Action: 02/04/2025 – Public Hearing Completed (H)
Bill String: HJR 54
Next House Hearing: Hearing not scheduled
Calendar: Bill currently not on a House calendar
[….]

The summary:

HJR 54 [pdf]– REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE
SPONSOR: Stinnett

Upon voter approval, this constitutional amendment prohibits abortions, except in cases of medical emergencies, fetal anomalies, rape, or incest. In the case of abortions performed or induced because of rape or incest, the abortion may be performed or induced no later than 12 weeks gestational age of the unborn child and only if documentation is presented to the attending physician that the rape or incest has been reported to a law enforcement agency that has jurisdiction to investigate the complaint at least 48 hours prior to the abortion.

The amendment also prohibits public funds from being used to pay for abortions; prohibits the use of surgeries, hormones, or drugs to assist a child with a gender transition; and holds that any person who intentionally or negligently causes damage to another person relating to the provision of reproductive health care or the performance or inducement of an abortion is liable for damages and subject to suspension or revocation of his or her medical license. Under this constitutional amendment, a woman’s right to reproductive freedom includes the right to health care in cases of miscarriages, ectopic pregnancies, and other medical emergencies. The General Assembly will have the authority to enact laws to carry out these provisions.

This bill is similar to SJR 33 (2025)

Submitted testimony, in committee:

I am support of protecting women and their right to reproductive healthcare!!!!!

My body, my choice. Period.

I feel that it should be up to a woman to decide what she wants to do with her body. The state nor the government should be able to dictate what she should do. Reproductive care should be allowed and provided as well as encouraged for the well being of every woman.

I support reproductive rights and bodily autonomy. Outside of any definition of “life”, outside of even the fact that we can’t force people to be organ donors in life or in death even if it could save lives (nor should we force people to), there should be a separation of church and state and it’s immoral and illegal to try to control and rule over people by your specific christian rules. christianity is not fact, not should it be law. While christians are more than welcome to live their lives by these rules (rules not provided by the Bible, I KNOW y’all aren’t reading it), you don’t get to force others to.

All women should have control over their own body and health.

I voted yes on amendment 3

Every person, including women, in this country should have the right to make decisions concerning their body. The notion that women should be given less rights is complete lunacy. The voters in this State made their opinions known when they cast their ballot. Let the people’s decision stand.

I am submitting this testimony to express my strong opposition to HJR 54. This resolution not only threatens the reproductive rights of Missourians but also risks putting lives in danger and deepening existing inequalities in our state. Abortion is a deeply personal and often difficult decision that should be made by individuals in consultation with their doctors—not dictated by politicians. People seek abortions for many reasons, including life-threatening medical conditions, financial insecurity, or knowing that they are not in a place to provide for a child. These decisions cannot and should not be reduced to political talking points. The provision in HJR 54 that allows for exceptions in cases of rape or incest may seem compassionate on the surface, but it is anything but. It requires survivors to report their abuse and provide documentation—despite the fact that many victims are unable to safely report their abusers, especially if those abusers are family members or individuals with power over them. Even for those who do report, investigations can drag on for months or even years, far exceeding the 12-week cutoff. This effectively denies survivors the care they need and deserve. But the issues with HJR 54 go beyond just one provision. Abortion restrictions like this one overwhelmingly harm people who are already vulnerable. Those living in rural areas, people of color, and low-income individuals often have limited access to healthcare to begin with. For these communities, banning abortion doesn’t just limit choices—it creates life-threatening obstacles. Let’s be clear: Amendment 3 reflects the values and decisions of Missouri voters. Repealing it would ignore the will of the people and undermine their trust in the democratic process. Missourians deserve access to compassionate, safe, and respectful healthcare, free from unnecessary barriers or government interference. I urge you to reject HJR 54 and uphold the protections established by Amendment 3. Thank you for taking the time to consider my testimony.

I am nearly 80 years old. For 50 years of my life, women have had the right to make decisions about their reproductive health. The voters have spoken and the will of the people should be respected and upheld.

Support abortion choice in Missouri – 1,538,659 Missourians voted YES on Amendment 3–you were elected to defend those rights – Reproductive Freedom is a Missouri value – Missourians made it clear at the ballot: we support access to abortion and all reproductive health care; our government should reflect those shared values not threaten them

Access to reproductive care is ESSENTIAL to the health of women and families. Any restrictions, whether gestational timeline, reason for need of care, or others, is a detriment to women. This is about medical care which should be decided by a woman and her doctor, not a politician. If a woman’s morals, religion, or social stance lead to a decision in the case of an abortion, that is her right. Allowing exceptions to care only muddies the waters when it comes to TIMELY and safe reproductive care. Ignoring the vote of the people is absolutely abysmal and it’s embarassing that we are, once again, having to defend our own rights as human beings.

This has been voted on & settled. Isn’t that the point of “sending it back to the states” so do what we voted for.

[….] I’m a wife, mother and a woman who believes in access to healthcare for all. 1,538,659 Missourians voted YES on Amendment 3, you were elected to defend those rights.Reproductive Freedom is a Missouri value. Missourians made it clear at the ballot: we support access to abortion and all reproductive health care; our government should reflect those shared values not threaten them.For a party that preaches small government, when we tell you to stay out of our bedrooms, doctors offices and medical care—we mean it.

[….] I voted to legalize abortion is Missouri. This is a vote I expected to be honored and respected. This is a moment for Missouri politicians to prove they are a voice for the people by executing the amendment the majority voted for.

I have needed life saving reproductive healthcare that without it I would have died. Amendment 3 is vital to protecting women from death during pregnancy and childbirth. Voting to overturn something that the voters put into place is disposable. The lawmakers are supposed to be upholding what their constituents want- and there is no more direct way to know what the constituents want than upholding their vote. Do not repeal amendment 3!

I support reproductive health care and allowing the choice to be left up to each individual. Pro choice!!! We voted in it and it passed. You cannot remove our votes because you don’t like the results.

Yet they keep trying.

I voted for amendment 3 and expect that it be enforced not over ridden by ignorant people, mostly men who have no understanding of how important it is to getting access to good reproductive medical health care for your body as well as allowing responsible doctors to save people’s lives if an abortion is necessary. To not enforce what Missouri’s overwhelmingly voted for is against every democratic process there is…

[….] It’s not complicated. I’m in full support of abortion because it is absolutely a woman’s right to have full control and rights over her body. It should not be up for debate, nor should it be regulated in anyway by religious or government body doctrine.

I fully support reproductive healthcare in our wonderful state of Missouri. Women’s reproductive freedom will benefit women, men and children in a positive mental, emotional, physical a d economic way. As a community college teacher I work with scores of young men and women who agree and wish for the guarantee of this freedom for our future. They express how disheartened and disenfranchised they feel in our political climate. I submit this testimony in solidarity with them and for myself and my family – children and grandchildren. We are not going back!

“We will not go back”

You wanted this to be a state issue. You wanted the people of the state to decide. We voted and 1,538,659 people voted yes to reproductive freedom. Your job, as elected officials, is to uphold the will of the people. This no longer up debate.

The State of Missouri voted to uphold abortion in our state and now there is a push to again deny the will of the voters. This is a gross miscarriage of justice. Stop trying to impose your will on the people who clearly told you, No. Abortion is a woman’s choice and right. It is reproductive care. It is NONE of your business. It is NOT up to you too change the will of your constituents [….]

I support the repeal of Amendment 3 and wish to impose the restrictions outlined in HJR 54.

Believe them when they tell you what they want to do.

As a mother of 4 children of 10 grandchildren I am in favor of ending killing babies and selling of infant body parts for profit. I am a concerned citizen,voter and Grandmother. Please stop!

Same planet, different world.

Abortion is healthcare! Keep your laws off my fucking body!

I am in favor of repealing Amendment 3. It was and is a terrible bill and use or State of Missouri as a “trail balloon” for other states. This needs to be repealed ASAP. Children / Babies have a right to be born. We give more rights to dogs than humans.

Is somebody going to tell him?

I support HRJ 54 that it be passed to abolish Amendment 3. Passage of Amendment 3 is such a stain on our pro-life state of Missouri. God will not bless our state with such a law in our constitution. So many babies are murdered and the many of these mothers experience a lifetime of pain and guilt. It is time to promote and encourage women to keep their babies and to show women how to cherish and love their babies instead of encouraging women to choose a way out of their pregnancies.

You do you.

I believe that medical decisions should be made by a doctor and the patient.

I voted along with a majority of Missourians for the reproductive choice bill. Why are we still fighting over this.?

“54 years ago…”

I want my November vote to be honored as a voting citizen. Women have a right to seek the care they require. I didn’t vote for this governor, yet I am expected to accept the election results. I now expect the same on womens rights and protections

Why would you undermine the will of the people in Missouri? Reproductive health care is health care. proposition passed and should remain intact without politicians trying to overturn this to stay in power. I am in support of reproductive freedom and body autonomy. It’s sickening to see politicians pretend the country would be better by repealing the will of the people.

Missourians like me and my family are tired of our elected representatives attempting to circumvent the will of the voters. We stand in support of Amendment 3, which enshrined reproductive freedom and AGAINST HRJ 54. Legislators who cannot support the law and uphold the votes of their constituents do not belong in the Missouri State House. This matter is decided. Can you please move on to real issues, like improving education, healthcare, and bringing new businesses to our state? The quality of life in Missouri continues decline and you do NOTHING to make our state a better place and support families and children. We continually rank at the bottom of important quality of life indices as compared to other states. We also stand against HRJ 54’s prohibitions regarding gender affirming care. Let parents and their medical professionals decide what’s best for their children. The government does not belong in private healthcare matters of any kind. Thank you.

I am appalled that the will of the people of Missouri is being blatantly ignored. The citizens of this state have already made their wishes known: reproductive rights and freedoms are to be made available to any pregnant person in the state of Missouri. It is also incredibly infuriating that this proposal not only seeks to go against the vote of Missourians but also ties the rights of transgender people into this argument. They are two completely different issues and should remain as such.

The state of Missouri has already voted and decided to continue reproductive rights in favor of abortion. This is ridiculous and goes against what the people voted for.

I’m struggling to understand the desire to move to a minority rule mentality, as we as a State had this as a ballot measure that had the support and won in November. This desire to move to a world where if you lose, you deny the results, you deny the selection of the people that put you in/out of power is not only problematic, it’s not how the system is suppose to work. We the people vote, you perform for the will of the people. We need to be adults, accept when you lose and win with grace.

Yet, here we are.

Missourians already voted and expect that our representatives will honor our vote to protect abortion rights in our state. Your job is to serve the people, so please stop trying to negate their voice.

As a woman in the state of Missouri i want amendment 3 defended. I do not support HJR 54. I do not support losing my right to a safe legal abortion. I’m tired of having to continue this fight. I deserve bodily autonomy and so does every other woman.

You get the picture.

There are close to 2000 additional submitted comments.

Previously:

Chutzpah (Kansas) (August 4, 2022)

Campaign Finance: Not too sure about that (January 16, 2024)

Missourians for Constitutional Freedom – women’s rights initiative petition for 2024 ballot (January 18, 2024)

Campaign Finance: Remember Kansas? Missouri is next. (January 19, 2024)

Campaign Finance: own it (January 19, 2024)

Campaign Finance: We’re not in Kansas anymore (January 19, 2024)

Mark Alford (r) – failure to read the womb, again (January 21, 2024)
Campaign Finance: More (January 22, 2024)

Campaign Finance: and more (January 23, 2024)

Campaign Finance: It does, but not in the way you think. (January 23, 2024)

Campaign Finance: and even more (January 26, 2024)

Campaign Finance: “No one expects the anti-choice imposition” (January 26, 2024)

Campaign Finance: this is the beginning, not the end (February 1, 2024)

Campaign Finance: keep it coming (February 4, 2024)

Campaign Finance: philanthropy (February 6, 2024)

Missourians for Constitutional Freedom – volunteer training, petition signing, rally – Kansas City, Missouri – February 6, 2024 (February 6, 2024)

Rev. Holly McKissick – Missourians for Constitutional Freedom – Kansas City – February 6, 2024 (February 7, 2024)

Rabbi Doug Alpert – Missourians for Constitutional Freedom – Kansas City – February 6, 2024 (February 7, 2024)

Dr. Iman Alsaden – Missourians for Constitutional Freedom – Kansas City – February 6, 2024 (February 8, 2024)

Hartzell Gray – Missourians for Constitutional Freedom – Kansas City – February 6, 2024 (February 8, 2024)

Campaign Finance: the world in which they want you to exist (February 9, 2024)

Signing, Everywhere, All at Once (February 10, 2024)

Campaign Finance: definitely a global impact (February 16, 2024)

Campaign Finance: forward (February 21, 2024)

Campaign Finance: still more (February 23, 2024)

Campaign Finance: more forward (February 26, 2024)

Campaign Finance: keep it coming in (March 5, 2024)

Signing the Petition – Sedalia, Missouri – March 17, 2024 (March 17, 2024)

Campaign Finance: there’ll be more (March 20, 2024)

Signing the Petition – Warrensburg, Missouri – April 5, 2024 (April 5, 20204)

Campaign Finance: sign the petition (April 10, 2024)

Sign the Petition (April 15, 2024)

Signing the petition in Lexington, Missouri (April 23, 2024)

Campaign Finance: on several levels (April 27, 2024)

Signing the Petition in Raymore, Missouri (April 28, 2024)

Campaign Finance: guess what’s next (April 29, 2024)

This morning in Jefferson City, Missouri – delivering the signed petitions (May 3, 2024)

This morning in Jefferson City, Missouri – delivering the signed petitions – part 2 (May 3, 2024)

Abortion Rights Rally in Jefferson City – May 3, 2024 – Press Gaggle (May 4, 2024)

Campaign Finance: coming up on the agenda (August 6, 2024)

Reproductive Freedom and Health Care will be on the November Ballot (August 13, 2024)

Campaign Finance: the tide (August 14, 2024)

Campaign Finance: for the November wave (August 22, 2024)

Campaign Finance: Bam! (August 23, 2024)

Campaign Finance: Dayam (August 24, 2024)

Campaign Finance: no one has forgotten (August 30, 2024)

Campaign Finance: $10,000.00 here, $10,000.00 there (September 1, 2024)

Campaign Finance: Back to the Dark Ages (September 4, 2024)

Campaign Finance: On an express train back to the Dark Ages (September 4, 2024)

Campaign Finance: $10,000.00 here, $250,000.00 there (September 5, 2024)

Campaign Finance: throw down the gauntlet (September 5, 2024)

Campaign Finance: seriously all in (September 6, 2024)

Campaign Finance: “We will not go back” (September 9, 2024)

Missouri Supreme Court: Amendment 3 is on the November 5, 2024 ballot (September 10, 2024)

Campaign Finance: the road to November 5th (September 12, 2024)

Campaign Finance: apparently a guy thing, mostly (September 14, 2024)

Campaign Finance: Why are we not surprised? (September 19, 2024)

Campaign Finance: a friend (September 23, 2024)

Campaign Finance: wedge issue (September 24, 2024)

Campaign Finance: no time to waste (September 26, 2024)

Campaign Finance: time is almost up (October 4, 2024)

Campaign Finance: Who would have thought? (October 7, 2024)

Campaign Finance: unequal and opposite (October 9, 2024)

Campaign Finance: not messing around (October 10, 2024)

Donald Trump’s (r) World: they want you to continue to live in it (October 15, 2024)

Campaign Finance: In 20 days (October 16, 2024)

Campaign Finance: even more for choice (October 21, 2024)

Campaign Finance: what she said (October 25, 2024)

Campaign Finance: after that forced birth, you’re on your own (October 25, 2024)

Campaign Finance: everyone knows someone (October 27, 2024)

Campaign Finance: making it their business (October 28, 2024)

Campaign Finance: gird your loins (October 29, 2024)

Campaign Finance: To spend on what?

Fuck You, Fuck You, Very, Very Much (October 30, 2024)

Campaign Finance: the forced birthers spend their money (November 2, 2024)

On the same ballot (November 6, 2024)

And here you thought you were safe (November 8, 2024)

Campaign Finance: missed it by that much (November 9, 2024)

Andrew Bailey’s (r) favorite whine (November 27, 2024)

SB 119: right wingnut lunacy (December 5, 2024)

Amendment 3: a number of Missouri’s TRAP statutes enjoined by the Jackson County Circuit Court (December 20, 2024)

Planned Parenthood remains subject to TRAP restrictions in Missouri (December 21, 2024)

Rolla (January 5, 2025)

About that city council meeting in Rolla (January 7, 2025)

The Missouri we all know and love… (January 8, 2025)

No need for nukes

12 Thursday Feb 2009

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

committee hearing, CWIP, Lager, missouri

Tuesday I attended the (four hour long) Senate committee hearing on Senator Delbert Scott’s bill to undo the legislation that forbids utilities to charge customers up front for new plants. And guess what I learned: we need another nuclear power plant! Oh, there was little doubt about that. Senator Brad Lager, R-Maryville, chair of the committee, started the proceedings by noting that we would “hear some insights from our friends at Ameren” and he urged witnesses opposing the legislation to tell the committee “what would need to be changed for you to be supportive of it.”

There were proponents and opponents of SB 228, but even the opponents, most of them, started by saying, “I know we need this plant and I support that idea.” Then they’d add something to the effect: “But, geezarooney, could you please not hand the credit card numbers and savings account information of every ratepayer in eastern Missouri over to AmerenUE to do with as it pleases?” Admittedly, the witnesses exaggerated less than I just did, but polite moaning about the way this bill hands Ameren the keys to the consumer kingdom was the motif of the day.

I’ll have more to say about their testimony and about how the committee sweated Ameren CEO Voss. That’s for a later posting. My more immediate goal is to answer Senator Lager’s assumption that nothing is wrong with this bill that some (major) tweaking wouldn’t fix. Horsehockey. Nothing could be changed to make it more palatable because it assumes we need another nuclear plant, when, in fact: We. Do. Not.

The arguments for building one generally fall into three categories. The first is that demand is rising, and we must be prepared to meet it.

Investing in energy efficiency, though, would easily offset the rising demand because the increase in usage is so piddling little and dwindling every year. Increased efficiency, according to numerous studies since 1992, could whittle our usage so that it would be well below what it has been. Melissa Hope, speaking for the Sierra Club, testified:

Our electric and gas utilities, with their financial resources and expertise, have the power to save their customers energy and money, reduce pollution and the need for expensive new capacity, and mitigate climate change. They could offer customers free home energy audits, rebates on energy-efficient lighting, insulation and appliances, etc. But they have no incentive-indeed they have a positive disincentive-to do so.  CWIP gives the incentive to do just the opposite – it encourages high cost, large energy supply sources.

“Achieving all cost-effective energy efficiency” is the goal of the National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency, a public-private partnership coordinated by the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Energy. According to NAPEE, efficiency programs could save our country 20% of its electricity and 10% of its natural gas consumption.  In fact electric energy use is already dropping.

Note: DOE projections for annual growth in demand: 1.7%, 1.3%, to 1.1% annual growth rate.  The current demand is also dropping and that is before the downturn in the economy. [boldface hers]

Ameren CEO Voss testified that Ameren is committing $30-$50 million a year to helping its customers use power more efficiently. Really? If so, that ought to take up the slack nicely–especially if we use federal stimulus money not only to weatherize public buildings but also to build windmills and install solar panels.

But, said former Republican representative Ed Robb, building enough windmills to provide adequate power would require 250 square miles, and much of our land isn’t suitable for producing wind power. (Kudos to Robb for the most unintentionally entertaining statement of the day, by the way. He urged building the plant for the jobs it would provide. But, Senator Lembke pointed out, those jobs are at least four years down the line. How can we create jobs in the meantime? “Cut the corporate income tax,” said Robb. There was no follow up from Lembke on that obvious truth.)

Besides the fact that windmills take up too much room, what if you want to run your dishwasher or send an e-mail on a calm, windless night? Alternative sources aren’t necessarily there for you when you need them.

Those arguments are disingenuous on a couple of levels. To say that alternative sources aren’t dependable is akin to telling somebody he has to eat all the perishables in his house today or lose them. Yeah, if he doesn’t have a refrigerator. But perishables can be stored in the 21st century. And so can electricity, including the power that alternative sources generate.

Here’s another miracle of modern science: electricity can be transported over large distances. There’s this other state called Nebraska. Montana too. Boy, do they have wind. Wyoming’s state tree is the telephone pole. There are no forests up there to block the breezes. Currently (excuse the pun) moving power from the Northwest to Missouri or New Jersey is tricky because of our outdated power grid. Enter President Obama, speaking about the economic stimulus package:

“But we’ll also do more to retrofit America for a global economy,” he added. “That means updating the way we get our electricity by starting to build a new smart grid that will save us money, protect our power sources from blackout or attack, and deliver clean, alternative forms of energy to every corner of our nation.

It’s true that creating a smart grid will take years. But so will building another nuclear plant–a minimum of ten years for the plant. Suppose Ameren’s customers invest billions, only to discover that we have a white elephant, unnecessary because windmills have been built in North and South Dakota–or Texas–and the smart grid is already moving the electrons to St. Louis. Europe has updated its grid, and now the U.S. is about to follow suit.

A future with a smart grid in it is also the answer to the very real concern that a carbon tax may be imposed in this country to force us to cut carbon emissions. Right now, this state gets 80 percent of its power from coal-fired plants. A carbon tax might drive our rates up 40-50 percent, so nuclear proponents argue for another plant since it would create less carbon footprint than coal-fired plants. That’s true. But it would also create a lot more carbon footprint than a windmill.

The other inconvenient by-product of nuclear plants is radioactivity and the cancers that result from it. But that topic deserves its own posting.

So, Senator Lager, this proposed plant isn’t necessary. In fact, the nuclear energy industry is a dinosaur, costly and dangerous. Some of us just haven’t noticed that yet.  

 

Recent Posts

  • No Kings – Warrensburg, Missouri – June 14, 2026
  • Ancient history repeats
  • Campaign Finance: promising us high regressive sales taxes
  • Close
  • Campaign Finance: way, way in

Recent Comments

Steve Duane Phipps on No Kings – Warrensburg,…
No Kings – War… on Warrensburg, Missouri – No Kin…
Campaign Finance: pr… on Campaign Finance: for billiona…
Campaign Finance: wa… on About that ‘inconvenient…
Campaign Finance: ke… on About that ‘inconvenient…

Archives

  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,052,059 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...