• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Tag Archives: st. louis post-dispatch

Ann Wagner vs. the St. Louis Post-Dispatch

10 Monday Feb 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

ACA, Affordable Care Act, Ann Wagner, CBO report, Congressional Budget Office, Deficit, missouri, Obamacare, st. louis post-dispatch

Rep. Ann Wagner’s (R-2) is hopping mad – or, more likely, hopping around, trying to get off the liar’s hot seat (remember the refrain “liar, liar, pants on fire”?). What’s got her hopping? A recent editorial in the St. Louis Post Dispatch that had the temerity to suggest that the deficit was falling, the economic outlook is improving and that the findings of a Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report on Obamacare economic impacts have been grossly misinterpreted by folks like Wagner. So what does she do to relieve the gut-churning evidently induced by the good news? Why, write a letter to the editor, of course, insisting that they take it all back – a letter which she then proudly forwarded to her lucky constituents, a move meant, undoubtedly, to let the Tea Party types among them know what a big, fearsome Obama-hater she really is.

Rep. Wagner attributes her motivation for writing to her tender concern for constituents who, according to her claims, have been telling her about all the ways their lives  have been ruined by Obama administration policies, especially Obamacare:

Every day I hear from hardworking families in the 2nd District who are struggling to make it to the 15th and the 30th of every month in this tough economy. These are real people struggling under the weight of President Obama’s failed agenda.

Wagner added a few details in the constituent email:

Every day I hear from far too many hardworking families in the 2nd District who have seen their premiums skyrocket, their health insurance cancelled, who have been forced to change their doctors, and have seen their hours cut back at work.

I haven’t followed every pronouncement from Rep. Wagner on the topic of Obamacare, but when she starts moaning and groaning about her constituents’ Obamacare-related suffering, concrete details are few and far between. Which is probably intentional given that similar “true” stories promulgated by Wagner’s GOP colleagues have not been able to withstand close scrutiny. Remember, for instance, the subsequently debunked Bette story in Cathy McMorris Rogers response to the SOTU? Of course, it’s also likely that the complaints that she has received in response to her solicitations for Obamacare hardship stories reflect a partisan bias that skews perceptions. A Gallup poll released last week showed that only 19% of Americans said that they had been hurt by Obamcare and, of that 19%, 60% were Republican or Republican-leaning.  Which, in turn suggests that what Steve Benen identifies as political “tribalism” leads people to respond to polls – and requests from politicians for political ammo – in the way they think they should.

The real point is not that Missourians are suffering due to Obamacare, but that Rep. Wagner has invested lots of capital in questionable rhetoric and she’s up in arms  when folks like the Post-Dispatch editorial staff who, after looking carefully at the recent CBO report, point out that she and her GOP cohorts have distorted its contents. Her claims are simple:

The numbers in the CBO report couldn’t be clearer: Due to Obamacare, the equivalent of 2.5 million people will leave the workforce over the next 10 years, and government-run health care will add another trillion dollars to our national debt.

This is where the burning pants really ignite. Wagner is willfully wrong on both counts.

The CBO report does not say that jobs will be lost, just that some people will voluntarily leave the labor force or reduce their hours of work because they don’t need to keep working in order to secure affordable health insurance. Hours will not be reduced by employers, but by employees. In fact, as the Washington Post points out, “the CBO declares that ‘there is no compelling evidence that part-time employment has increased as a result of the ACA,'” thus  decimating one of Wagner’s talking points about employers cutting employee hours to escape paying for health insurance. There’s lots to be said on this topic, and I think most of it got said last week – and none of it supports Rep. Wagner’s hyperbolic assertions, including a statement from the author of the report she considers so clearly negative, CBO director Doug Elmendorf. In fact, as Elmendorf pointed out, the report indicated that Obamacare would have a positive employment effect:

Elmendorf also noted that the ACA is actually expected to boost the economy in the near-term by making health insurance and medical care affordable for the poorest Americans, giving them the freedom to spend money in other areas of the economy. “On balance, CBO estimates that the ACA will boost overall demand for goods and services over the next few years,” states the report.

As for the business about increasing the deficit:

…the CBO reduced its estimate of the net cost of the ACA by $9 billion through 2024, in part because of the number of states that have refused to implement the law’s Medicaid expansions. And the CBO still maintains that, over the 10-year window of its analysis, the ACA will reduce the federal deficit. In fact, that trend is expected to increase in subsequent years, with the ACA leading to greater deficit reduction.

So what should we think about Rep. Wagner’s whining ways? Paul Krugman’s summary of GOP duplicity could have been tailor-made to her measure:

… .Remember, the campaign against health reform has, at every stage, grabbed hold of any and every argument it could find against insuring the uninsured, with truth and logic never entering into the matter. Think about it. We had the nonexistent death panels. We had false claims that the Affordable Care Act will cause the deficit to balloon. We had supposed horror stories about ordinary Americans facing huge rate increases, stories that collapsed under scrutiny. And now we have a fairly innocuous technical estimate misrepresented as a tale of massive economic damage.

To conclude, sorry Rep. Wagner, but Obamacare is beginning to work out, the economy is getting better despite harmful GOP budget cutting, and lots of things are really getting better for lots and lots of Americans – despite the best GOP efforts to hide the truth.

Snark.

19 Sunday Jan 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Brian Nieves, chocolate chip dinosaur pancakes, missouri, st. louis post-dispatch, Tony Messenger

Yesterday, via Twitter and Facebook, from Senator Brian Nieves (r):

briannieves ‏@briannieves

Why does Tony Messenger live in Wildwood instead of the Near North Side? Why is he enjoying a $10 Breakfast and not working a Soup Kitchen? 9:34 AM – 18 Jan 2014

Brian Nieves

OK – Serious question… Is it monumentally hypocritical for someone like Tony Messenger, who always writes about the plight of the poor, the plundering of the rich, and the glory of STL City, to live in a fairly affluent area – far disconnected from the Urban Core – and be at a mild to moderately high priced breakfast place on a Saturday morning instead of serving the poor at a Soup kitchen?

Now look – I’m a million miles away from perfect and I’m sure there is much to be said about stupid things I’ve done but how about asking the Extremist Leftist Liberals in the press to at least pretend to LIVE what they Preach! Your thoughts?

Yesterday at 7:56am

One of the responses:

Tony Messenger ‏@tonymess

For the record, my daughter enjoyed her “mild to moderately high priced” chocolate chip dinosaur pancakes this morning. Cc: @briannieves 1:28 PM – 18 Jan 2014

Snark:

Sean Nicholson ‏@ssnich

@tonymess What’s for breakfast? 6:42 AM – 19 Jan 2014

Update:

Tony Messenger ‏@tonymess

Someone stole my paper this morning. Neighborhood has really gone down since they let the fully indoctrinated Marxist liberals in. #subtweet 8:22 AM – 19 Jan 2014

News Flash: The editorial page is intended to be used for editorial opinion

10 Wednesday Oct 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

missouri, political endorsements, st. louis post-dispatch

A doozy of a letter appeared in today’s St. Louis Post-Dispatch. The writer took exception to the decision of the Post-Dispatch‘s editorial board to endorse President Barack Obama for another term. So far so good; disagreement about the reasons for the endorsement would be fine. However, the letterwriter apparently thinks that the Post-Dispatch‘s endorsement violated their journalistic obligation to report the news without bias:

I only wish you could read your masthead, the fine print at the top of the editorial page. It reads, in part: “never belong to any party” and “always be drastically independent.”

What would Joseph Pulitzer say if he were alive today?

Well, … it’s very likely that Pulitzer would say that the Post-Dispatch made excellent use of the editorial page, the place in the paper dedicated to opinion. Maintaining an “independent” stance in reporting news does not preclude an editorial position endorsing a candidate of either party  – something that I assume the Post-Dispatch has been doing since its founding, right along with every other major U.S. newspaper – most of which also strive to report news in an unbiased fashion.

This letter was actually the second since the editorial endorsement appeared (the first seems to be no longer available online) to complain that the Post-Dispatch actually (gasp!) took an editorial stance. I suspect that the real bone of contention was simply that the editorial board’s position doesn’t jibe with that of the letter writers. But a more important problem lies in the inability of the letter writers to make categorical distinctions. How can we have a functioning democracy when our citizens are unable to  either tolerate or distinguish between editorial and news functions? Such confusion may, however, explain why we hear conservatives – who, ironically, largely turn to the openly biased Fox News for information – blathering on and on about media bias.  

The Post-Dispatch censors Kinder’s stream of twitter consciousness

15 Friday Oct 2010

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

censorship, missouri, Peter Kinder, st. louis post-dispatch

If you think that the Post-Dispatch is still a significant source for local and state information, take a look at this posting from FiredUP Missouri. In short, it seems that the editors at the Post-Dispatch trimmed an article by Tony Messenger about the poor relations between Lieutenant Governor Peter Kinder and Governor Nixon, deleting references to some very extreme and inflammatory statements that Kinder has sent out on twitter. Read the FiredUp post for the details. To say the least, the account does not inspire confidence in the Post-Dispatch.

The bowdlerized Post-Dispatch article that appeared in the print edition (as opposed to the original online article that was also cut significantly) did leave in a tidbit that struck me as revelatory. Kinder opposed a transfer of $9 million dollars from a first-time home buyer tax credit program that Nixon wanted to use to help pay for work at the the Bellefontaine Habilitation Center in St. Louis. The tax credits were not being used and the transfer had been approved by the legislature. After Nixon broached the issue with Kinder, Kinder did an about face and the Housing Commission Board on which he serves voted to okay the transfer, but not without Kinder petulantly declaring:

Had Gov. Nixon merely explained the request and shown up in person to ask for $9 million, it would have passed the first time it came before the commission.

A little arrogant maybe? Does Kinder think he’s Don Corleone holding court for supplicants?

Why did Kinder, or the Board, for that matter, require a special, personal visit from the governor to explain the situation. I may not understand how things work in Jefferson City, but in my past work life, I distinctly remember firing off emails to my Director or even requesting meetings when I had concerns abut her proposals. Maybe I’m naive, but I’m willing to bet that Kinder could have managed to do something like that if he were interested in getting things done rather than grandstanding.  

Where Blue Girl and I debate Tony Messenger via Twitter with one hand tied behind our back

08 Saturday Aug 2009

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

disruption, health care reform, media criticism, st. louis post-dispatch, Teabaggers, Tony Messenger, town halls, Twitter

Within the flurry of coverage of yesterday’s disruption of a health care town hall in the St. Louis area was the news today that Senator Claire McCaskill had to cancel one event scheduled for next week because the people in charge of the location were concerned about safety.

Our Twitter exchanges with Tony Messenger of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch swirled around that news:

tonymess SEIU union council in Missouri issues statement blaming Tea Party activists for assaulting “reverend and SEIU member.” about 2 hours ago from TweetDeck

tonymess RT @clairecmc: Very disappointed that U City school dist cancelled our event. We will expand the time on afternoon event … about 2 hours ago from TweetDeck

tonymess Tea Party activists today are crediting @clairecmc for how she is handling protests (at least for her tone on Twitter). about 2 hours ago from TweetDeck

TheyGaveUsARep @tonymess Think perhaps the 3 teabaggers who can pass for sane are taking assessments & see an unpleasant near future & R backing up a bit? about 2 hours ago from web in reply to tonymess

tonymess @TheyGaveUsARep The ones I talked to seemed sincere about not wanting this to escalate. I’m seeing both sides trying to calm down today. about 2 hours ago from TweetDeck in reply to TheyGaveUsARep

At this point Senator Claire Mccaskill was posting via Twitter about the cancellation of the Tuesday morning town hall.

TheyGaveUsARep @tonymess They don’t get a pass just because some of the less dangerous ones want to back up today. Also today:SEIU threatened,@clairecmc=/= about 2 hours ago from web in reply to tonymess

TheyGaveUsARep @tonymess They may find that the genie doesn’t go back in the bottle willingly, and they deliberately uncorked the crazy,”rattle him””shout” about 2 hours ago from web in reply to tonymess

MBersin @tonymess “both sides?” As if people who want a public option are Glenn Beck fans? Just gotta love that false equivalence… about 2 hours ago from web in reply to tonymess

tonymess @MBersin What false equivalence? I talked to libs and conservatives today who are asking their members to avoid conflict. That’s both sides. 44 minutes ago from TweetDeck in reply to MBersin

MBersin tonymess “What false equivalence?” Oh, please. You’ve never heard of Glenn Beck and the rest of the Mighty Wurlitzer? The same rhetoric? 36 minutes ago from web in reply to tonymess

tonymess @MBersin Of course I have. But what’s your point? I merely Tweeted that both sides in last night’s conflict are asking for calm. 33 minutes ago from TweetDeck in reply to MBersin

tonymess @MBersin I didn’t compare one sides rhetoric to another or say one was better or worse. 32 minutes ago from TweetDeck in reply to MBersin

MBersin @tonymess Glenn Beck is asking for calm? Really? 31 minutes ago from web in reply to tonymess

TheyGaveUsARep @tonymess So do you condemn “Freedom Works” and the like for initiating the disruption strategy that set us on this path? 31 minutes ago from web in reply to tonymess

MBersin @tonymess False equivalence: “shut ’em down” or “gee, we’d like a public option”. Sesame Street: “One of these things is not like the other” 26 minutes ago from web in reply to tonymess

The Twitter exchange ended here.

And while we’re talking about false equivalence, let’s take a another look at hotflash’s video from yesterday’s town hall.

More Idiocy from the Political Fix

16 Thursday Oct 2008

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 8 Comments

Tags

debate, kevin mcdermott, Political Fix, st. louis post-dispatch

Another presidential debate, another bizarre comment from political reporter Kevin McDermott on the P-D’s Political Fix. Last debate he totally got the public reaction wrong. This time, he imagines that the big negative visual from the debate, much like Bush 41 checking his watch or Gore sighing, will be Obama’s grin when he doesn’t like an answer from McCain.

WTF? Did he not see McBlinky snorting and eye-rolling his way through the debate?  

Recent Posts

  • Campaign Finance: Oxymoron
  • The weather overnight
  • Johnson County Democrats – Blue Dogs in the Park – Warrensburg, Missouri – May 16, 2026
  • The power of one
  • “…I’m so confused…. if our elections have not been free and fair, how did you get elected??…”

Recent Comments

Uh, in case you were… on Some right wingnuts with money…
Winning at losing… on Passing the gas – Donald…
TACO Tuesday | Show… on TACO or Mushrooms?
TACO Tuesday | Show… on So much winning
So much winning | Sh… on Passing the gas – Donald…

Archives

  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,048,193 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...