• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Monthly Archives: January 2015

Sen. Roy Blunt (r): amend this

24 Saturday Jan 2015

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

missouri, Roy Blunt, Senate, Twitter

Yesterday via Twitter:

Senator Roy Blunt ‏@RoyBlunt

New GOP-led Senate has already voted on more amendments in 1 week than all of the amdt votes 2014. Good step fwd. 7:35 AM – 23 Jan 2015

Because process is always more important than actual content? Just asking.

Much hilarity ensued – some of the responses:

Terry Linhardt ‏@tlinhardt

@RoyBlunt Too bad Republican majority screwed up the abortion bill. Why do they shoot themselves in the foot? 7:40 AM – 23 Jan 2015

That was in the House. It’s in their nature.

Joann Wolf ‏@JWosRainbows

@RoyBlunt are ANY of them about jobs or just your ideological bullshit? 7:45 AM – 23 Jan 2015

That was blunt.

Ph.D Street Smarts ‏@WantDoOverYet

Forgot to finish your sentence too @RoyBlunt .. that fucks America & Americans BIG TIME, backwards is your forward.. 7:48 AM – 23 Jan 2015

That was blunt, too.

Rich Zellich ‏@zellich

@RoyBlunt It would be if most of those amendments weren’t a stab in the People’s eye. 5:48 PM – 23 Jan 2015

Thereby demonstrating once again that the current situation is not better than a poke in the eye with a sharp stick.

spooner ‏@spoonersenate

@RoyBlunt keepup the great work. 10:18 PM – 23 Jan 2015

Ah, enthusiasm.

We can probably safely predict that public opinion approval of Congress won’t get significantly better any time soon.

Campaign Finance: the dude abides in St. Louis County

24 Saturday Jan 2015

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

John Goodman, Kevin O'Leary, missouri, St. Louis County

Yesterday at the Missouri Ethics Commission, for a St. Louis County Council seat (in a special election to replace Steve Stenger who is now County Executive):

C151025 01/23/2015 CITIZENS FOR KEVIN O’LEARY John Goodman [….] New York NY 10003 Self Actor 1/16/2015 $25,000.00

[emphasis added]

Dude!

The campaign committee:

C151025: Citizens For Kevin O’leary

2557 New England Town Road Committee Type: Candidate

St Louis Mo 63129 Party Affiliation: Democrat

[….] Established Date: 01/21/2015

[….]

Election Year Primary Outcome General Outcome Political Office

2016 Council Person District 6 St Louis County

[emphasis added]

President Obama in Lawrence, Kansas – January 22, 2015 – Photos

23 Friday Jan 2015

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Jerry Schmidt, Kansas, Obama, University of Kansas

President Obama spoke yesterday in Lawrence, Kansas at the University of Kansas. Jerry Schmidt photographed the event:

IMG_8400

President Obama spoke yesterday in Lawrence at the University of Kansas – January 22, 2015. Photo: Jerry Schmidt

IMG_8690

Photo: Jerry Schmidt

IMG_8441

Photo: Jerry Schmidt

IMG_8738

Photo: Jerry Schmidt

IMG_8851

On the rope line. Photo: Jerry Schmidt

Previously:

President Obama in Kansas – January 21, 2015 (January 21, 2015)

President Obama in Lawrence, Kansas – January 22, 2015 – White House transcript (January 22, 2015)

President Obama in Lawrence, Kansas – January 22, 2015 – White House transcript

23 Friday Jan 2015

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Kansas, Obama, University of Kansas

President Obama arrived in Topeka aboard Air Force One the night before his speech in Lawrence at the University of Kansas.

The White House transcript of President Obama’s January 22, 2015 remarks – as delivered:

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release

January 22, 2015

Remarks by the President on Middle-Class Economics — University of Kansas, Lawrence KS

University of Kansas

Lawrence, Kansas

11:30 A.M. CST

THE PRESIDENT:  Hello, Kansas!  (Applause.)  Rock Chalk!  (Applause.)  Can everybody give Alyssa a big round of applause for the great introduction?  (Applause.)  It is good to be at KU! (Applause.)  I’ve got to admit, I took a moment to meet with Coach Self and the KU basketball team.  (Applause.)  I mean, we’re here for other business, but while I was here — (laughter) — I thought I should talk to some basketball players.  And it is January, so that means that the Jayhawks are at the top of the Big 12, hunting for your 11th straight conference title.  (Applause.)

I want to thank your Chancellor, Bernadette Gray-Little.  (Applause.)  I want to thank Mayor Amyx for having me.  I recently heard from Bob Dole, as well.  He told me he’s very proud of his Institute of Politics here.  (Applause.)  Any school of politics named for Bob Dole is one I’d be proud of, too, because he is a great Kansan and a great American.  (Applause.)

And it’s good to be back in Kansas.  (Applause.)  I’ve got deep roots in Kansas.  (Applause.)  As you know, my mom was born in Wichita.  (Applause.)  Her mom grew up in Augusta.  Her father was from El Dorado.  (Applause.)  So I’m a Kansas guy.  (Applause.)  I’m a Kansas guy.

Now, that helped me in the caucus here in 2008.  (Applause.) It didn’t help me as much in the general election.  (Laughter.)

AUDIENCE MEMBER:  We’re sorry!

THE PRESIDENT:  Coach Self won 10 straight — I lost two straight here.  (Laughter.)  But that’s okay.  Listen, I love you — and I might have won sections of Lawrence.  (Applause.)  That’s possible.  That’s a possibility.  (Laughter.)  But, look, this is exactly why I’ve come back to Kansas today.

On Tuesday, I gave my State of the Union address.  (Applause.)  And I just want you to know, today I will be shorter.  (Laughter.)  But I want to begin where I finished on Tuesday, because I talked about in the State of the Union how, over a decade ago, in Boston at the Democratic Convention, I gave a speech where I said there is no liberal America or  conservative America, there’s a United States of America.  We’re all supposed to be on the same team.  (Applause.)

And I know it can seem sometimes like our politics is more divided than ever; that in places like Kansas, the only blue stands for KU.  (Laughter.)  And so because of those divisions the pundits in Washington, they hold this up as proof that any vision of a more hopeful politics must be naïve or misguided.  But, as I pointed out, I still believe what I said back then.  I still believe that we, as Americans, have more in common than not.  (Applause.)  And I have seen too much of the good, generous, big-hearted optimism of the American people over these past six years to believe otherwise.

I will never stop trying to make our politics work better.  That’s what you deserve, and that’s how we move this country forward.  And, Kansas, we’ve got some big things to do together. (Applause.)  We’ve got some big things to do.

We start this year with some good news.  Our economy is creating jobs at the fastest pace since 1999.  (Applause.)  Our deficits are shrinking.  Energy production is booming.  Our troops are coming home.  (Applause.)  We have risen from recession in a better position, freer to write our own future than any nation on Earth.  So now we’ve got to choose what our future will look like.  And when I look out at this crowd, it’s your generation in particular that’s going to have to decide what this future looks like.  Are we going to accept an economy where only a few of us do spectacularly well?  Or do we commit ourselves to an economy that generates opportunity and rising incomes for everybody who’s willing to work hard and make an effort?  That’s a choice we’ve got to make.  (Applause.)

For six years, we’ve been working to rebuild our economy on a new foundation.  And what I want people to know is, thanks to your hard work, thanks to your resilience, America is coming back.  We believed we could reverse the tide of outsourcing and draw new jobs to our shore.  And over the past five years, our businesses have created more than 11 million new jobs.  (Applause.)

We believed we could reduce our dependence on foreign oil and protect our planet at the same time.  (Applause.)  And today, America is number one in oil and gas, but we’re also number one in wind power.  And every three weeks, we bring as much solar power online as we did in all of 2008.  We have doubled wind power production.  (Applause.)  And thanks not just to lower gas prices, but also higher fuel standards, the typical family this year should save about 750 bucks at the pump.  (Applause.)

We believed that we could prepare our kids for this more competitive world, 21st century economy.  And today, our younger students have earned the highest math and reading scores on record.  Our high school graduation rate has hit an all-time high.  And more young people like you are finishing college than ever before.  (Applause.)

We believed that sensible regulations should encourage fair competition, and shield families from ruin, and prevent the kind of crisis that we saw in 2007, 2008.  So today we’ve got new tools to stop taxpayer-funded bailouts.  And in the past year alone, about 10 million uninsured Americans have finally gained the security of health coverage.  (Applause.)  We’ve gotten that done.

Now, at every step we were told that we were misguided, or too ambitious, or the laws we pass would explode deficits or crush jobs or destroy the economy.  I just want everybody to remember that.  (Laughter.)  Roll back the tape.  (Laughter.)  Roll back the tape.  And instead we’ve seen the fastest economic growth in over a decade.  We’ve seen the deficits cut by two-thirds.  People’s 401ks are in better shape because the stock market has doubled.  (Applause.)  We have put ourselves in a position in which the economy potentially can grow not just for next year, or the year after that, but over the next decade, and generate the kind of jobs that all of you will fill.

AUDIENCE MEMBER:  Thank you!

THE PRESIDENT:  So the verdict is in:  Middle-class economics works.  (Applause.)  Providing opportunity for everybody works.  The ruling on the field stands.  (Laughter.)  And these policies are going to continue to work as long as we don’t let politics get in the way.  Especially politics in Washington.  (Applause.)  We can’t put the security of families at risk by taking away their health insurance.  We’re not going to get rid of the rules we put in place to check recklessness on Wall Street.  If those efforts come to my desk, I will veto them — (applause) — because we’re moving in the right direction.

And here’s what’s most important.  Today because the economy is growing at a faster pace, we’re starting to actually see wages tick up for the first time in a very long time.  And a survey of small businesses showed they are more likely to provide raises to their employees than any time since 2007.  (Applause.)  So we’ve got to make sure that all people have the tools and the support that they need to take advantage of this growing economy.  It’s not good enough just to not screw it up — let’s build on the momentum and move it even further.  Let’s keep it going.  Let’s keep it going.  That’s what we’ve got to focus on.  (Applause.)  That’s what we’ve got to focus on.

So how do we restore this link between hard work and being able to get ahead?  How do we make sure that everybody is doing their fair share, everybody has a fair shot, and everybody is playing by the same set of rules?  How do we make sure that everybody not only shares in success but also is able to contribute to the success of the United States of America?  That is middle-class economics.  That’s our project.  (Applause.)  And that’s something that, by the way, shouldn’t be a Democratic or a Republican issue.  That should be an American issue.  (Applause.) All of us should want that kind of success for the middle class and everybody who’s willing to work hard to try to get into the middle class.  (Applause.)

So what does middle-class economics require?  Well, the first thing is trying to give people a sense of security at a time when they economy is so rapidly changing, so dynamic, that people can’t rely on being in one place, in one job for 30 years, 40 years.  That’s not going to be the career that young people like you have.  You’re going to be doing a whole range of things, and it’s going to be fluid.  And you’re going to have to be taking advantage of opportunities, and you’re going to have to adapt to new circumstances.

And so part of what we have to do is to make sure that we’re giving families some sense of security in the midst of all this change.  And that means helping folks afford child care.  It means helping folks afford college.  (Applause.)  It means helping folks get paid leave at work.  It means making sure people have health care.  (Applause.)  It means helping the first-time homebuyer.  It means helping folks save for retirement — although you guys don’t have to worry about that for a while. (Laughter.)  He raised his hand, “actually, I do.”  (Laughter.)

And so I’m sending Congress a budget, a plan, that’s going to help a family with all of these issues — lowering the taxes for working families by thousands of dollars, putting money back into their pockets so that they can have a little bit of cushion in their lives.  We can do that.  And today I want to focus on one of those ideas, and that’s child care.  (Applause.)

Now, I mentioned my grandparents were from Kansas.  Well, my grandfather, Stanley Dunham, he went to Europe to fight in World War II.  And while he was gone, my grandmother, she was like Rosie the Riveter — Madelyn.  She worked on an assembly plant for bombers.  And because it was a national priority, having women in the workforce was critical.  My grandmother worked at a bomber assembly line in Wichita.  And by that time, my mom had already been born.  So this country provided universal child care because they understood that if women are working, they’re going to need some help — right?  They understood that.  (Applause.)  And research shows that it was good for the kids, good for the parents.  But we stopped doing it, even though almost every other advanced country on Earth continued to do it — learned from us and did it.

Now, in today’s economy, when having both parents in the workforce is an economic necessity for many families, affordable, high-quality child care and early childhood education — these aren’t just nice-to-haves, this is a must-have.  (Applause.)  And studies show that children who get a high-quality early education earn more over their lifetimes than their peers who don’t.

So think about that.  You give somebody — you give parents support and you give a child that little boost at the beginning, it lasts a lifetime.  Which means that the entire economy is more productive for a lifetime, for a generation.  Young people who get that good early start are more likely to finish school; they’re less likely to get in trouble with the law.  And access to child care can lead to higher employment and incomes for the moms — which means the whole family is doing better.  (Applause.)

So the point is, if we knew how to do this back in 1943 and ’44, and here we are in 2015, what’s the holdup?  It is time that we stop treating child care as a side issue or a “women’s issue.” This is a family issue.  (Applause.)  This is a national economic priority for all of us.  We can do better than we’re doing right now.  (Applause.)

And right now, in 31 states, high-quality child care costs more than a year of tuition at a state university.  Think about that.  By the way, this is personal for me because Michelle and I remember what it was like trying to — and we had good jobs.  But trying to figure out how to manage child care costs was extraordinary, at the same that you’re paying back student loans. So this is something you have a deep interest in — all of you.  Because I’m assuming some of you are going to have a little bit of school debt.  (Laughter.)  Just a little.  And then you start a family, and now you want to start saving for their college education.  But in the meantime, you’re already paying the equivalent of college tuition just to make sure that they’re okay at home.  This is a strain that cuts — and by the way, Republican families feel it just as much as Democratic families. They don’t — there’s no distinction.

I don’t want any family to face the choice between not working, or leaving their children in unsafe or poor-quality child care.  We are a better country than that.  We’re a better country than that.  (Applause.)

So that’s why my plan will make quality child care available and affordable to every middle-class and low-income family in America with young children.  We’re going to expand access to high-quality care for more than 1 million children, and we’re going to offer a tax cut of up $3,000 per child per year.  (Applause.)  I don’t want anybody being “daycare poor.”

And we’re going to build on a bipartisan law that I signed last year to improve the quality of child care options so that parents know their children are well cared for, because we also want to lift up the quality of the facilities there.

And I just had the chance to visit the Community Children’s Center, which is a Head Start center here in Lawrence.  (Applause.)  Had a chance to spend time with 48 lucky kids.  (Laughter.)  Because they’re teachers are wonderful, not because they’re — although they all say, “I know you.”  (Laughter.)  “I see you on TV.”  (Laughter.)  That’s what they always say — “I see on TV.”  I say, yes.  Yes.  (Laughter.)  “You’re the President.”  (Laughter.)

So you have these wonderful teachers, and the light in all of these children’s eyes, the sense of possibility and potential for these kids, made me just that much more determined to keep strengthening and keep promoting and expanding early childhood education, to give all of our children a strong start.  (Applause.)  I want to support expectant mothers.  I want to make sure we’ve got universal child care to preschool for all.  It’s the best investment we can make.  It is the right thing to do.  We can do more to help families make ends meet.  (Applause.)

Now, even as we’re doing these things there are some other things we’ve got to do to help families who are middle-class or working their way into the middle class.  Higher wages helps — which means Congress still needs to pass a law that makes sure a woman is paid the same as a man for doing the same work.  (Applause.)  I mean, come on, now — it’s 2015.  (Applause.)  This should be sort of a no-brainer.  Congress still needs to raise the minimum wage.  (Applause.)  Like I said on Tuesday, if there are members of Congress who really believe that they can work full-time and support a family on less than $15,000 a year, they should try it.  (Applause.)  And if not, they should vote to give millions of hardworking people across America the raise that they deserve.  (Applause.)

And if we’re going to make sure that more and more people are earning higher wages down the road as the economy continues to transform, then we’ve got to help to make sure that more Americans like all of you are in a position to upgrade your skills.  That’s what you’re doing here.  And that’s the second part of middle-class economics.  That’s why we’ve been working to help more young people access and afford college.  That’s why I took action to help millions of students cap payments on their loans at 10 percent of their income.  (Applause.)  So if you want to go into teaching, or you want to go into public service, or you want to go into basic research — any field that doesn’t pay you a huge amount of money — you can do it.  (Applause.)

I want to work with Congress to make sure every student who’s already burdened with loans can find a way to refinance and reduce your monthly payments.  (Applause.)  And that’s why I’m sending Congress a bold, new plan to lower the cost of community college to zero.  (Applause.)  Down to zero.  In the new economy, two years of college should be as free and as universal as high school is today.

The third part of middle-class economics means we’ve got to build the most competitive economy in the world, and that means building the best infrastructure, and opening new markets so we can sell products around the world, and investing in research so we keep on being the creators of new products and businesses can keep creating jobs right here in Kansas and around the world — and sell them around the world.  (Applause.)

Now, the good news is Lawrence gets it.  (Applause.)That’s why you’re encouraging private companies to compete against one another to offer high-speed broadband at better prices.  And now you’ve got networks as fast as some of the best in the world:  There’s Hong Kong; there’s Tokyo; there’s Paris — and there’s Lawrence.  (Applause.)

So, helping families feel more secure, including helping with child care costs and improving the quality of child care option; making sure that you have the capacity to finance, constantly upgrading your skills; making sure that we’ve got a competitive economy, including not just roads and bridges and traditional infrastructure, but the new infrastructure of the 21st century — those are the things we need to do to keep the momentum going.

Now, Republicans in Congress may disagree with some of my ideas.  You know, I didn’t get as much applause from them as I was hoping.  (Laughter.)  But the truth, is when it comes to infrastructure and research, both parties generally agree that it’s important.  They say that to me privately; they just can’t applaud it publicly.  (Laughter.)

AUDIENCE MEMBER:  (Inaudible.)

THE PRESIDENT:  Yes, right.  (Applause.)

So, too often, where we get stuck is how to pay for these investments — because these things cost money.  Roads don’t build themselves.  Power grids and sewer lines and basic research — those things don’t pay for themselves.

And as Americans, we don’t mind paying our fair share of taxes, as long as everybody else does, too.  (Applause.)  The problem we’ve got is we’ve got lobbyists that have rigged the tax code with loopholes that let some corporations pay nothing while others are paying full freight.  We’ve got the super rich getting giveaways they don’t need, and middle-class folks not getting the breaks that they do need for things like child care.

So what I told Congress is let’s just close those loopholes. Let’s stop rewarding companies that keep profits abroad; reward companies that are creating jobs right here in the United States. (Applause.)  Let’s close loopholes that let the top 1 percent, or .01 percent avoid paying certain taxes — use that money to help more Americans pay for college and child care.  Let’s have a tax code that truly helps working Americans get a leg up in this new economy.  It’s a good investment that will ultimately be good for everybody.  (Applause.)

So that’s what I believe in:  Helping hardworking families make ends meet.  Giving everybody the tools they need to find good-paying jobs in the new economy.  Keeping our economy strong and competitive.  Making sure we’ve got a tax code that is fair so that we can get all these things done and grow the economy well into the future.  That’s where I think America needs to go. And that’s where I believe Americans want to go.  It’s going to make our economy stronger not just a year from now, or 10 years from now, but deep into the century ahead.

And I understand Republicans who disagree with my approach. So what I’ve said to them is, fine; show me your ideas to pay for things like R&D and infrastructure.  (Applause.)  Explain to me how you want to help families pay for college and for child care.

It’s perfectly fair for them to say, we’ve got a better way for meeting these national priorities — and then to specify what those ideas are.  What you can’t do is simply pretend that issues like child care or student debt aren’t out there, that they’re not important.  You can’t pretend that there’s nothing we can do to help middle-class families get ahead — because I’ve seen how we’ve been able to help middle-class families get ahead when we make an effort.

The answer can’t just be no to everything.  (Applause.)  I don’t mind hearing no to some things, but it can’t be no to everything.  At some point, you got to say yes to something.  (Applause.)  I want to get to yes!  (Applause.)  Tell me what you want to do.  Let’s get to yes on helping more families get by.  I want to get to yes on child care.  I want to get to yes on more young people going to college and not being loaded up with debt. That’s what I want to get to.  (Applause.)  

I want to get to yes for folks like Steve Ozark, from right here in Lawrence.  Where is Steve?  I know I saw him.  He was around here.  There he — you’re not Steve.  (Laughter.)  There he is right there.

So, last year, Steve wrote me a letter about his vision for this country — a place where every American, he said, has “a place at the table.”  And 25 years ago, Steve and his girlfriend, now his wife, were living paycheck-to-paycheck, with a baby on the way.  And for a while, they turned to food stamps to get by.  nd then they took out students loans so that his wife could go to college and get a job, and climb the ladder of success.  And today, they spend their time helping others in their community find a place at the table, because, as Steve wrote in his letter, it’s “what God and Grandma taught us to do.”  (Applause.)  God and Grandma — now, that’s some good authority right there.  (Applause.)  

The point is, is that we’re going to disagree on politics sometimes, but we don’t have to be so viciously divided as a people.  We all know what God and Grandma taught us to do.  (Laughter.)  Whoever we are — Republican, Democrat, male, female, young, old, black, white, gay, straight — we all share a common vision for our future.  We want a better country for your generation, and for your kids’ generation — a place where, as Steve wrote, everybody has “a place at the table.”  I want that country to be one that shows the world what I know is still to be true, that we are still not a collection of just red states and blue states; we are still the United States of America.  (Applause.)

So we’ve made it through some hard times, but we’ve laid a new foundation, Jayhawks.  We’ve got a new future to write.  The young people here are going to write a new future for America.  Let’s get started right now.  (Applause.)

Thank you.  God bless you.  God bless the United States of America.  (Applause.)

END

12:05 P.M. CST

Previously:

President Obama in Kansas – January 21, 2015 (January 21, 2015)

Is Climate Change the result of human activity? Missouri Senators disagree

23 Friday Jan 2015

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Brian Schatz, Claire McCaskill, climate change, energy policy, global warming, missouri, Roy Blunt

Members of the Senate have gone on record on the topic of whether or not climate change is occurring as the result of human activity. As Wired‘s Victoria Tang observed, “United States Senators stood up for what they believed in today – the results aren’t pretty.” What she meant was that of the folks to whom we have entrusted  the leadership of what is arguably the most powerful nation in the world, almost fully half made it clear that, in Tang’s words, they “think climate change is some other species’ problem”:

The Senate, by a 50-49 vote with 60 required, rejected the amendment to a Republican bill approving TransCanada Corp.’s Keystone XL oil pipeline. Republicans control the Senate 54-46.

The amendment, offered by Senator Brian Schatz, a Hawaii Democrat, would have deemed that “climate change is real” and that “human activity significantly contributes” to it.

It’s no big surprise, I’m sure, that Missouri Republican Senator Roy Blunt is on the list of those voting against the amendment that affirmed the overwhelming scientific consensus that climate change is man made. As long as the fossil fuel industry shows him an adequate amount of love, he will always love them right back. Besides, doesn’t he stand up with the GOPers who claim they can’t legitimately have such an opinion because they’re not scientists? And unlike our President who has made it clear that he understands what goes into creating a scientific consensus, he’s part of that group of policy makers who want us to think that their lack of credentials excuses them from listening to any inconvenient scientific facts. As David Shiffman argues in Slate:

When politicians say “I’m not a scientist,” it is an exasperating evasion. It’s a cowardly way to avoid answering basic and important policy questions. This response raises lots of other important questions about their decision-making processes. Do they have opinions on how to best maintain our nation’s highways, bridges, and tunnels-or do they not because they’re not civil engineers? Do they refuse to talk about agriculture policy on the grounds that they’re not farmers? How do they think we should be addressing the threat of ISIS? They wouldn’t know, of course; they’re not military generals.

I’d like to hear Roy Blunt answer those questions.

Democratic Senator Claire McCaskill, on the other hand, voted with the “yeas.” She accepts the scientific verdict about anthropogenic climate change although, to judge by her past performance, she also thinks that it’s okay to ignore inconvenient facts. Or maybe, do you think, the fact that she went on the record this week might prompt more responsible action in the future? After all, McCaskill is one of those folks who goes on interminably about the rather iffy threat posed to our children by our federal debt. Maybe she’s finally getting equally worked up over the incontrovertible threat to their future well-being posed by climate change?

This is not to say that there’s not been progress on the topic. The Senators did vote 59-1 to affirm that climate change is not a hoax. We can take comfort from the fact that it’s now so obviously ridiculous to deny the fact of climate change that all but one of the Senate’s highly-motivated Republican fossil fuel champions would have been embarrassed to affirm support that position in a public vote.

ADDENDUM:  Digby explains why the vote to affirm the fact of a changing climate was a total joke. Hint: “The leaders of the free world are cretinous imbeciles.”

*1st sentence edited slightly for clarity.

Campaign Finance: Who really needs $900,000.00 from one person?

22 Thursday Jan 2015

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Attorney General, campaign finance, Chris Koster, governor 2016, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission

Especially when you can raise the money from more people in smaller chunks.

Today at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C031159 01/22/2015 MISSOURIANS FOR KOSTER UFCW Local 655 Elect Political Fund 300 Weidman Road Ballwin MO 63011 1/20/2015 $25,000.00

C031159 01/22/2015 MISSOURIANS FOR KOSTER Andrew A OBrien 815 Geyer Avenue Saint Louis MO 63104 Self Attorney 1/20/2015 $10,000.00

[emphasis added]

Previously:

Campaign Finance: trying to keep pace (January 17, 2015)

Campaign Finance: the giant chess piece in the room (January 15, 2015)

Sorting it all out (January 12, 2014)

You’re gonna need a bigger bandwagon (January 2, 2014)

The immorality of the Republican majority

22 Thursday Jan 2015

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

By not expanding Medicade,300,000 Missourians are left without any healthcoverage. The facts clearly show that without access to healthcare, people are forced to make poor healthcare decisions, not go to the Doctor, or are unable to buy necessary medicines. The result is over 700 Missourians will die every year because they cannot enroll in Medicade. Thats two people dieing everyday because the Republican Majority refuses to accept the Federal dollars that would pay for 90% of the cost of saving these lives. And what of the 10%? They gave that money to big business in the form of $250 million in tax breaks in the last session.

Letting our people die to support business! Where is the outrage?  

President Obama in Kansas – January 21, 2015

22 Thursday Jan 2015

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Air Force One.meta, Kansas, Obama, president, Sam Brownback, Topeka

Yeah, this is a process story once again involving the President and Air Force One. Since we cover politics and government in the area and President Obama has a big event in Lawrence, Kansas tomorrow we’ve been going through the process to be able to cover the various components of his trip. The President arrived this evening in Topeka on Air Force One. And since the President may or may not choose to speak to the media upon arrival we took a chance and decided to show up to cover it.

There was a lot of hurry up and wait. And more waiting. We waited in a hanger-like building. Then, in a hallway. Towards the end of our wait Kansas Governor Sam Brownback (r) walked by, stopping to shake hands and say hello as he worked his way past the line of waiting media.

Shortly before the arrival of Air Force One we were escorted out on the tarmac. It was cold. Really cold. It was dark. Really dark.

Air Force One landed and taxied about 150 feet from the media riser (an old flatbed trailer). We tried to take photographs in the cold and darkness.

The President was greeted at the base of the stairs by Governor Brownback (r). They spoke briefly. Then the President entered the presidential limousine and the motorcade drove off.

President Obama arriving in Topeka – January 21, 2015.

At the foot of the stairs – Governor Sam Brownback (left) and President Obama (right) – January 21, 2015.

Governor Sam Brownback (r) speaking with the media on the tarmac – January 21, 2015.

After the President’s motorcade left Governor Brownback and a small group of individuals started walking back to the hanger-like building. Someone in the media area started yelling questions. Governor Brownback hesitated briefly and then turned to walk back toward the media area. The media as a whole descended on the spot from the riser and surrounding area. The noise of generators from the lights and media satellite trucks and the impenetrable media scrum made it impossible for us to hear the questions and answers which ensued. Evidently we’re not pushy enough. We did get some photos.

Previously: President Obama flew to St. Louis on Air Force One and then threw the first pitch… (July 15, 2009)

The SOTU gave Missouri House members the tried-and-true vapors

22 Thursday Jan 2015

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Ann Wagner, Barack Obama, Billy Long, Blaine Luetkemeyer, Jason Smith, missouri, republicans, Sam Graves, State of the Union, Vicky Hartzler

I visited the Web pages of the entire Missouri Republican House delegation, Reps. Ann Wagner (R-2), Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-3), Vicky Hartzler (R-4), Jason Smith (R-8), Sam Graves (R-6), and Billy Long (R-7). I wanted to see what they had to say about the President’s State of the Union Address (SOTU).

So how did the Missouri arm of the carping and always obstructionist Party of No react to the President pointing out a few facts. Are they embarrassed about how they behaved in the past now that Obamacare seems to be performing as intended, the United States economy is ginning up and putting the lie to the austerian economic policies still advocated by the GOP although they are failing dismally in Europe, slow and cautious foreign policy is showing signs of succeeding in a dangerous world where  military bluster of the sort advocated by the GOP has proven disastrous, and French economist Thomas Piketty has shown us that we need to rescue the middle class with a big dose of redistributive religion, which is just what the President has ordered?

The answer is not much. There was only one notable coinage; Rep. Wagner has dubbed the new GOP Congress The New American Congress. I think she hopes it’ll catch on. Otherwise our Republican guys and gals in Washington followed the rulebook and kept their statements short, simple, and on the tried and true message. The basic themes: Washington is the source of all bad, they are only going there to clean it up. Then they all thumbed their collective noses at the President’s hubris in suggesting that he could initiate any new programs since the Grand Old Poobahs have said no, and they were elected by the majority of the 33 percent of Americans who bothered to vote in 2014, an overweening mandate in their eyes. They conveyed this message with lots of repetition, using the same words and phrases almost interchangeably, with only minor stylistic fillips to distinguish them from each other. For instance:

— Phrases used to describe Obama, his goals and policies:

“expand the reach, size, and scope of the federal government”

“tax and spend”

“redistribute ” (i.e., income, prosperity, etc.)

“trying to divide us along class and income lines”

“same old, tired, Washington-based ideas”

“a top-down economy controlled from Washington”

“politics as usual”

” big-government policies”

“ill-conceived vision”

” failed policies”

“the American people deserve better.”

“political score-keeping”

“my way or the highway”

“the president wants to go at it alone”

“hurt our nation’s family farmers and small businesses”

“burdensome regulations”

“health-care costs are skyrocketing”

“premums skyrocket”

“Americans are struggling to find jobs”

“ignore the will of the people”

“policies and proposals that the American people rejected”

Phrases used to describe GOP, their goals and agenda:

“Government must get out of the way”

“job creation”

“a new direction”

“grow America’s economy – not Washington’s economy”

“remove burdensome regulations like Obamacare”

“unleash America’s energy resources”

“get Americans back to work”

“placing America’s priorities first”

“a healthy system marked by a legacy of opportunity”

“we can get Washington out of the way”

“we can do better”

“forge a new direction”

“a pro-growth, pro-jobs agenda”

“bipartisan solutions”

— Phrases used to describe what Republicans want from the President:

“work with us”

“work with this Congress ”

Obama must “stop issuing veto threats before common-sense pieces of legislation even get to his desk”

Given the relevant context it isn’t hard to interpret those last points. Translate “work with” into “roll over” and you’ve got the gist. As for the rest, I know, I know. You’ve heard them all before. And there’s lots of obvious fibs, misrepresentations, and wrong-headedness. Obamacare is doing just fine, jobs are being created faster than since before Bush, healthcare costs are going down, etc., etc. I’m sure you’re all getting as tired of trying to set these folks straight as I am, especially since it doesn’t do any good.  

I’m tempted to suggest that the GOP needs to convene some new focus groups, get some new material. They don’t have to make it complicated; we know slow, simple and familiar works with the folks they try to please. But do they have to be so predictable? But then, who reads press releases anyway – apart from bloggers with OCD.

*Corrected; last item from 2nd list moves to last list.

Long division

21 Wednesday Jan 2015

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

7th Congressional District, Billy Long, INCOME INEQUALITY, missouri, State of the Union

Representative Billy Long (r) issued a statement in response to President Obama’s State of the Union address:

Long Statement on State of the Union

01/20/15

           WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Rep. Billy Long issued the following statement on the president’s State of the Union address:

           “The American people sent a strong message to Washington in November that they wanted change.  Since then President Obama by his actions and words has doubled down on the policies and proposals that the American people rejected.  The new majority in Congress wants to empower the American people as we work for an efficient, effective and accountable government.  Hard-working taxpayers want economic growth, security and opportunity that a healthy economy would provide.  The president should direct his efforts in those areas as opposed to constantly trying to divide us along class and income lines.”

“…The president should direct his efforts in those areas as opposed to constantly trying to divide us along class and income lines.”

I’ve got news for Representative Long (r), we’ve been there for a while:

December 5, 2013

U.S. income inequality, on rise for decades, is now highest since 1928

By Drew DeSilver

….More than half (61%) of Americans said the U.S. economic system favors the wealthy, while just 35% said it’s fair to most people, according to a Pew Research Center survey conducted in March. A similar share (66%) of Americans said the gap between rich and poor had increased in the past five years; nearly three-quarters of respondents said the rich-poor gap was either a “very big” (47%) or “moderately big” (27%) problem….

….And while 54% of low-income people and 49% of middle-income people called the rich-poor gap a “very big” problem, only 36% of high-income people did so. A third of the high-income group said the rich-poor gap was either a small problem (19%) or not a problem at all (14%)….

A smart investor might want to get into pitchfork and torch futures.

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • Campaign Finance: Sadly, no
  • “What does God need with a starship?”
  • Are the Communists hiding in your closet right now?
  • Campaign Finance: do the math
  • Campaign Finance: Pennies from heaven?

Recent Comments

Yes, he really is th… on Mark Alford (r) –…
Campaign Finance: Ma… on Campaign Finance: Missouri is…
Campaign Finance: Ma… on Campaign Finance: for billiona…
Campaign Finance: fr… on Campaign Finance: the money be…
Campaign Finance: fr… on Campaign Finance: dismantle th…

Archives

  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,059,646 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...