• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Monthly Archives: June 2014

Campaign Finance: the real early voting initiative

13 Friday Jun 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

campaign finance, Early voting, initiative, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission

Today, at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C131163 06/13/2014 MISSOURI EARLY VOTING FUND Kenneth McClain 510 N. Delaware Street Independence MO 64050 Self Attorney 6/11/2014 $25,000.00

[emphasis added]

Remember, remember the fourth of November. 2014.

Previously:

Early voting initiative petitions in Missouri (November 20, 2013)

Campaign Finance: momentum (March 2, 2014)

Campaign Finance: How about, “Make it an unassailable right?” (April 6, 2014)

Campaign Finance: oh, yeah, early voting (April 17, 2014)

Campaign Finance: confidence in early voting (May 29, 2014)

NFDW in Kansas City – Claire Connor – “Wrapped in the Flag” – part 1

13 Friday Jun 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Claire Conner, Kansas City, missouri, Nation Federation of Democratic Women, Wrapped in the Flag

Previously:

National Federation of Democratic Women in Kansas City – June 12, 2014 (June 13, 2014)

Claire Conner: ….I have a unique story. One that you haven’t heard before, probably. I was raised in the heart of the radical right. It took me twenty-five years to figure out that virtually everything I had learned from my father and my mother I didn’t agree with. But living that long with a true, pure radical taught me a lot of things.

And he taught me the thing I most want to share with you tonight. There’s a reason why they win. The reason is so hard to grasp. It’s a simple reason, but we can’t grasp it. My father, thirty-two years, never changed his position on anything. Not once. He was driven by rage, anger, hatred and a supposed devotion to the flag and the Constitution.

I called my book “Wrapped in the Flag” because that is one of the biggest problems we face. We face a movement that wraps itself in such patriotic bull, bull it is astounding.        

But here’s what we don’t get, on the left. We get all that, but here’s what we don’t get. These people aren’t kidding. what they say is what they mean. When they talk about their plans and they talk about their philosophy they’re not kidding. And you can’t wrap your arms around it and I can’t either. Why? Because it’s stunningly impossible to think that you are dealing with a whole group of people, currently running, by the way, the House of Representatives, who do not believe in government. That was the biggest shock to me with my father. It took me years to grasp that. He loved the Constitution, but hated the government. Now that’s nuts, but it’s true. If you listen, you listen to the gang running the House that’s what you hear. They love the Constitution, but they hate the government. They have done such a wonderful job selling the American people on this problem, they started, by the way, with Reagan, Reagan took the idea that the biggest problem you have is the Federal Government and turned it into an eight year administration.

They have done such an excellent job selling us on the idea that our most serious problem is that the Federal Government is out to get you and you and me that right now sixty-three percent of Americans think the biggest problem they have is the Federal Government. Let me say this, not everybody appreciates it when I say this, but the liberals have failed to stand up and defend the idea that the United States has a Federal Government and that Federal Government has legitimate and essential functions. [applause]

Now let me be clear, I don’t love the NSA. I don’t love everything President Obama did or didn’t do. I don’t agree with everything the Federal Government has done. But, I do not believe that turning the United States back to something precolonial times is in any way an answer to our problems. To make America back into the image that the right has is to change us to something not one person in this country ever lived in or ever thought they wanted.

I figured this out in nineteen seventy-six. I was a slow learner. But in nineteen seventy-six I got it. I was born in nineteen forty-five, so, yes, I was a slow learner. Here’s what happened. I went up to see my mom and dad. We lived in the same town in Wisconsin and I had been pulling back from doing any Birch stuff for years. I kept saying. I’m not doing this, I am not participating, don’t call me. But it’s very hard to say no to your mom and dad, they were very persuasive. anyway, I was, at that time, involved in the pro-life movement, which is another interesting and important learning experience for me. I was on the national, on the state board, spoke all over the state. I believed, in nineteen seventy-six, that every person of good will would understand that the only way you stop abortion is by caring for mothers and children in need. That was evident to me. It was evident to me. It was absolutely crystal clear to me, not only as a christian woman, but as a human being that you cannot say anything if you’re not willing to help those people in need.

Okay. So, at the time in Wisconsin we had this governor and this re, Republican group in the legislature who were in the business of cutting all the funding for what we called WIC, women, infants and children. Now, I was on the board of Wisconsin Right to Life. I was speaking all over the state. I couldn’t get Wisconsin Right to Life to stand up and say no to the WIC cuts. And I couldn’t understand it. I simply couldn’t grasp that. I couldn’t understand that you would say, you cannot abort your child and we won’t do anything to help you feed that baby. It was, it gave me a headache. It gives me a headache talking about it now.

So, anyway, I was up at my mom and dad’s house and I was talking to them because I thought even though we didn’t agree on politics we certainly agreed on abortion, ‘kay. So I’m saying to them, you need to stand up with me and help this legislature stop these WIC cuts. My mother goes into her, her office comes back with the most recent John Birch Society bulletin. Every month the John Birch Society read a book, practically, to their members saying, this is what you’re gonna do, this is what you do, this is what we believe in, this is why. This particular bulletin was longer than usual because it was sort of an analysis of American history in time for the bicentennial, okay. So this is July nineteen seventy-six. And she starts reading from this bulletin written by Robert Welch, the founder of the Birch Society. He goes through American history and he says, in nineteen hundred, this was like the apex of American history, in nineteen hundred we had this wonderful economy, people were discovering all kinds of possibilities, uh, the free enterprise system was in full bloom. Nineteen hundred, folks, ‘kay. And then he went on and said, and this is a quote, there were pockets of poverty, however [laughter], but, even the poverty was offset by the blessings of liberty, thus it was a healthy kind of poverty, healthy poverty, because every man understood that relief from dire want was entirely his own  responsibility. I said, what the hell are you talking about? what are you talking about? Healthy poverty? I said, so you’re answer to the pro-life movement is healthy poverty? Now we laugh about this, but let me tell you something, did you hear [Representative] Paul Ryan and the House of representatives when they cut food stamps last year?

I actually, my parents did a lot of things for me, and one of the things they did is turn me into a policy wonk. Because you couldn’t have a conversation with them if you didn’t know more than they knew [laughter], okay. But that was a good thing. So I’m kind of a brainiac about that kind of stuff. So, I actually turn on C-SPAN, I know I’m one of the only weirdos who does, but I do. So, when they’re debating on the food stamps I turned it on. And I said, I was so sad and so angry, but I also realized every last one of those people sounded just like the people who came to dinner at my house who were the leadership in the emerging radical right.

Paul Ryan, Paul Ryan sounds like every John Birch yapper who I ever met. Paul Ryan, John Boehner, the whole gang of these people, Eric Cantor, defending. And in Kansas you guys have Chris Kolbach. Poverty’s good for you. I love that. Don’t you love that? People who are millionaires who stand up with their absolutely hideous arrogance and say, poverty’s good for you people. Now we have to give every rich corporation a tax break, we have to cut taxes in Kansas for everybody who is wealthy, but, oh my god, those poor people, they’re gonna do better if we keep ’em poor. They’re gonna work hard, ’cause you know they’re lazy, you know they’re lazy. That’s why they’re poor. Now this is a crock on every level. But, it works. It works, it works, it works for a couple reasons.

Number one, they appeal to people who think, gee, you know, if the government stops giving my, my lazy neighbor help, in the morning I’m gonna be rich. So, there is that. I used to say to my dad, you know, the reason you’re a conservative is because inside of you you think you’re going to win the Irish lottery as long as the poor people don’t get any help. And there is that.

But there’s another thing. We don’t call them out for this. We let them get away with it….

National Federation of Democratic Women in Kansas City – June 12, 2014

13 Friday Jun 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Claire Conner, John Birch Society, Kansas City, missouri, National Federation of Democratic Women, Wrapped in the Flag

The National Federation of Democratic Women are meeting in Kansas City from June 11th through the 15th. Yesterday evening there was a reception and then, at 7:00 p.m., a PAC event where Claire Conner, author of “Wrapped in the Flag” – her memoir of growing up in a home steeped in the John Birch Society and the radical right, was the featured speaker.

The Kansas City skyline from the fortieth floor of the Sheraton.

New Mexico Democrats – working for you!

Claire Conner, author of “Wrapped in the Flag” – the evening’s speaker.

Claire Conner.

We’ll have more on Claire Conner’s remarks in subsequent posts.

Gov. Jay Nixon: override this

11 Wednesday Jun 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

General Assembly, governor, HB 1455, HB 1865, HB1296, Jay Nixon, missouri, SB 584, SB 612, SB 662, SB 693, SB 727, SB 860, SB829, veto

“…The bills I am vetoing today appear to be part of an ongoing effort by the general Assembly to enact special exemptions and credits that pick winners and losers through the tax code and shift a greater tax burden to the majority of taxpayers who are unable to utilize such loopholes…”

“…The unabated growth of these special carve-outs and the fiscal irresponsibility of failing to budget for them are all the more troubling when the general Assembly is simultaneously seeking to raise taxes on all Missourians with what could be the largest tax hike in Missouri history…”

Governor Jay Nixon vetoed a number of bills today:

Gov. Nixon vetoes special interest breaks rushed through in the final hours of the legislative session

June 11, 2014

Fiscally irresponsible carve-outs were not accounted for in the budget passed by the General Assembly or in the budgets of local jurisdictions they would impact

Jefferson City, MO – Gov. Jay Nixon today vetoed legislation containing more than a dozen special breaks and exemptions passed in the final hours of the legislative session.  These special interest carve-outs would reduce state and local revenues by up to $776 million annually and were not accounted for in the Fiscal Year 2015 budget passed by the legislature or in the budgets of the local jurisdictions they would impact.  In a letter addressed to members of the General Assembly, the Governor faulted the legislature for ignoring the legislative process and adding new loopholes to the tax code that will shift a greater tax burden to the majority of taxpayers.

“Rushed through with little debate in the final hours of the legislative session, these special breaks and exemptions for a handful of special interests are the result of a deeply flawed process and a fundamentally misguided approach to tax policy,” Gov. Nixon said. “Many of the most costly provisions were slipped into bills without a public hearing or even a fiscal note, and none of these giveaways were accounted for in the budget the legislature sent to my desk or in the local budgets of the jurisdictions they would impact.”

The provisions include special breaks for fast food restaurants, personal seat licenses, commercial dry cleaners and laundries, data storage and processing, certain used vehicles, farmers’ markets and fitness centers.  The fiscal impact of these provisions, which would reduce state and local revenues by as much as $776 million annually starting in the fiscal year that will begin on July 1, was not accounted for in the budget passed by the General Assembly or in the budgets of local jurisdictions.  This includes a $425 million annual reduction in state tax and a $351 million reduction in local taxes.

Most of these provisions would impact sales tax collections, and therefore would reduce local tax revenues that support police, fire, ambulance, emergency services, parks, children’s services and other public services provided at the local level. The loss of local revenue from these provisions could also impact repayment of voter-approved bonds issued to finance capital improvements such as county jails, county hospitals, fire stations, emergency management centers, road projects and other critical public infrastructure.

“These special carve outs and loopholes would undermine local public services and flout the will of voters by eroding revenues that support services like firefighters and cops, libraries and ambulance services, snow plows and health inspectors, public transit and road repair,” Gov. Nixon said. “From storm water management in West Plains to fire protection in Webster Groves, voters in communities across Missouri have come together to pass local sales taxes to support local public services and capital improvements . These special breaks passed by the General Assembly would siphon these voter-approved resources away from their intended purpose, and into the pockets of the well-connected.”

The reduced state sales tax revenue would also reduce funding from dedicated sales taxes for K-12 schools (also called the Proposition C sales tax), Highways, Conservation, State Parks, and Soil and Water Conservation Programs.

“Perhaps most troubling is the way the General Assembly is carving out special sales tax breaks for a select few, while pushing a $6.1 billion sales tax hike on all Missourians,” Gov. Nixon said.   “Passing secret, sweetheart deals so that the well-connected can pay less, while asking all Missourians to pay more, reflects priorities that are dangerously out of whack.”

Senate Bill 693, which would reduce state and local highway funding by more than $30 million annually, was passed just two days after legislators sent to the ballot a $6.1 billion sales tax increase to fund roads.

“Instead of engaging in an open and honest debate about the overall tax policy of our state, the legislature has once again opted for an undisciplined, scattershot approach by adding more loopholes to the already dizzying array of carve-outs that riddle our tax code,” Gov. Nixon said. “My vetoes today are a first step toward restoring fiscal sanity to a budget process that has gone off the rails.  That being said, I have the responsibility to maintain fiscal discipline regardless of whether my vetoes are sustained.  Moving forward, I will take the actions necessary to account for the reduced state revenues resulting from these giveaways and keep our state on a fiscally sustainable path.”

The Governor vetoed the following bills:

   Senate Bill 693, which would exempt from state and local sales tax certain used vehicles and rights of first refusal for tickets sold at the Sprint Center in Kansas City, and would expand the Wine and Grape Production Tax Credit;

   Senate Bill 584, which would, among other provisions, exempt from state and local sales tax items used in the storage or processing of data in any form, items used in the generation, transmission, distribution, sale or furnishing of electricity by power companies, and certain fees paid to places of recreation.

   House Bill 1865, which would create new exemptions from state sales taxes for the cost of utilities used by restaurants, grocery stores, convenience stores, fast food restaurants and other facilities engaged in food preparation;

   Senate Bill 612, which would exempt commercial laundries and dry cleaners from state and local sales taxes on various purchases, and would waive tax liability for certain business.

   Senate Bill 860, which would enable a purchaser to obtain a sales or use tax refund, even when they have current tax delinquencies;

   House Bill 1296, which would authorize certain corporations to utilize an alternative method of determining the amount of their income that is derived in Missouri and would add graphing calculators to the back to school sales tax holiday.

   Senate Bill 727, which would exempt certain items purchased from some, but not all, farmers’ market vendors from state and local sales and use taxes;

   Senate Bill 662, which would waive tax liability for certain businesses and would exempt from sales tax rights of first refusal for tickets sold at the Sprint Center in Kansas City;

   House Bill 1455, which would allow a business to claim a sales tax exemption without requiring it to prove eligibility for the exemption;

   Senate Bill 829, which would enact duplicate legislation to House Bill 1455.

[emphasis in original]

Governor Nixon’s letter [pdf] to the General Assembly:

Governor of Missouri

[….]

June 11, 2014

Members of the General Assembly:

I am writing to inform you of my veto today of a number of bills passed during the final hours of the legislative session that put the Fiscal Year 2015 budget you passed significantly out of balance. These measures would also negatively impact the budgets of local jurisdictions around the state, in addition to reducing sales tax revenues that provide dedicated funding to education, highways, conservation, parks and soil and water programs.

The bills I am vetoing today include House Bill No. 1296, House Bill No. 1455, House Bill No. 1865, Senate Bill No. 584, Senate Bill No. 612, Senate Bill No. 662, Senate Bill No. 693, Senate Bill No. 727, Senate Bill No. 829, and Senate Bill No. 860. Contained within these bills are loopholes and special breaks that a thorough fiscal analysis projects will permanently and immediately begin reducing state revenue by up to $425 million annually and local revenue by up to $351 million annually. Unlike the fiscal impact of Senate Bill Nos. 509 & 496, which was conveniently foisted off on future budgets, there are no delays, triggers, or other gimmicks that can be touted as shielding education, public safety, and other vital public services from the projected $776 million in state and local revenue legislators voted to to send to narrow special interests on the last day of the session.

The special tax breaks in these bills are not fiscally responsible. Indeed, not a penny of them was taken into account in the Fiscal Year 2015 budget you passed. Although legislators may have abdicated their fiscal responsibilities in failing to account for this budgetary impact, the resulting imbalance cannot be ignored and will have to be corrected through dramatic spending reductions by state and local governments. In addition to disregarding the budget process, legislators ignored the normal legislative process in rushing these bills to passage, slipping in costly provisions without public hearings and without fiscal notes reflecting the impact on state and local budgets.

Just as these measures were not accounted for in the state budget, neither has their impact been accounted for by the local jurisdictions that rely on local sales tax revenue to support police, fire, ambulance, emergency services, parks children’s services and many other vital public services. Indeed, the eduction in local revenue resulting from these special breaks could impact repayment of voter-approved bonds issued to finance capital improvements such as county jails, county hospitals, fire stations, emergency management centers, road projects and other critical infrastructure.

The new exemptions and loopholes in the bills that I am vetoing today are not the mere clarifications their supporters claim. Instead, they seek to overrule no fewer than twenty Missouri Supreme Court decisions going back to 1977 that have been followed by the Department of revenue over the course of previous and current administrations. The court cases sought to be abrogated by this legislation ruled that the laws enacted by the General Assembly required a tax to be collected, notwithstanding that a particular business had hoped to be excused from the legal obligations we all share. While it is well within the rights of a losing litigant to petition their elected representatives, it is wholly disingenuous to call doing so here anything than what it is – seeking a special exemption from the law, as currently written and confirmed by the courts.

The bills I am vetoing today appear to be part of an ongoing effort by the general Assembly to enact special exemptions and credits that pick winners and losers through the tax code and shift a greater tax burden to the majority of taxpayers who are unable to utilize such loopholes. With more than 260 current sales tax exemptions and tax credits, the continued erosion of the tax base through additional individualized exemptions and credits violates well-established principles of sound tax policy that call for a broad tax base so that tax rates can remain low. Indeed, legislative leadership has recently called for a comprehensive review of this dizzying array of tax exemptions. But rather than heeding calls to reduce costly and inefficient carve-outs, legislators have instead rushed through many more, leaving Missouri families to pick up the tab for education,law enforcement, and other vital public services.

The unabated growth of these special carve-outs and the fiscal irresponsibility of failing to budget for them are all the more troubling when the general Assembly is simultaneously seeking to raise taxes on all Missourians with what could be the largest tax hike in Missouri history. While the benefits of the more than one billion dollars in annual tax breaks legislators have passed over the last two months will go disproportionately to the wealthy, the burden of this multi-billion dollar tax increase for transportation would fall disproportionately on Missouri’s working families and seniors.

Throughout my time as Governor, I have worked with legislators on fiscally responsible ways to improve our tax code while protecting our state’s fiscal health and balancing the budget, including four tax cuts that I have signed into law. Even during this legislative session, I worked directly with legislators to put forward a specific, concrete proposal that would have lowered taxes for Missourians and reined in costly and inefficient tax credits for special interests, broadened the overall tax base and reduced tax rates, while protecting our ability to invest in education and other vital services. Unfortunately, legislators refused to enact this broad tax relief in favor of narrow giveaways. That is an endeavor I cannot support.

Sincerely.

s/

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon

Governor

That’s gonna be one heck of a veto session.

For the time being it’s still about people getting out and voting

11 Wednesday Jun 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Erica cantor, Primary, republicans, Virginia

In case you haven’t heard yet, Representative Eric Cantor (r), the number two republican in the House leadership, lost his primary to a teabagger:

State of Virginia Results

[….]

Unofficial Results – Primary Election – June 10, 2014

Precincts Reporting 242/243

Member House of Representatives – 7th District – Republican

David A. Brat 35,787 55.55%

Eric I. Cantor  28,631 45.45%

Total Votes 64,418

On Twitter:

Robert Costa ‏@costareports

it’s the biggest blow to the GOP establishment in years. Whole network of DC Rs have been wired into Cantor, prepping for when he got gavel 7:47 PM – 10 Jun 2014

That’s a feature, not a bug.

Taegan Goddard ‏@politicalwire

This is easily one of the most stunning primary losses in U.S. political history [….] 7:49 PM – 10 Jun 2014

Seth D. Michaels ‏@sethdmichaels

There is no length you can go to on your right to protect yourself, House Republicans, no show of opposition showy enough. So maybe govern? 7:51 PM – 10 Jun 2014

Heh.

Money, check. Polling, check. Voters, uh….

You Had Better *Believe* This Mom Is Mad

11 Wednesday Jun 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

By @BGinKC

I am so god-damn sick of mass-shootings and talk of tyranny and revolution that I could vomit. You don’t even have to turn on the news anymore. All you have to do is have a cell phone, and it starts chirping away as soon as the google-alerts start coming in if you make your living in the political world like I do, or when they start rolling into your Facebook news feed if you’re a normal person.

Either way, you can’t escape it.

Less than two months ago, the hate came home when a right-wing extremist killed three people at a Jewish community center and a Jewish retirement home in the KC metro area. A couple of weeks ago, it was Elliott Rodger stabbing and shooting his way across Isla Vista, California because hot women weren’t lining up to fuck him, even though he was a rich kid with a daddy who was a Hollywood producer.

Today there was another shooting, this one at a high school in a suburb of Portland, Oregon. Two people are dead, including the shooter, and a second armed person has been found on the campus and taken into custody…but here’s the kicker…the second gun was found during the evacuation process and wasn’t related to the shooting. It was just there. Someone just had a gun at school…No big whoop.

Tuesday’s school shooting in Troutdale, Oregon was the seventy-fourth school shooting since Sandy Hook. Let me repeat that…Not since Columbine, which would be tragic enough to contemplate, but since Sandy Hook – and it was the fourth mass shooting in six days.

My point is, you don’t even have to turn on the news anymore to hear about them, and they happen with such frequency that we’re numb to the horror, we’ve become inured to the carnage and we’re tired of hearing about it.

Seen any cute cat pics lately?

Well, I, for one, have had enough. I’m a liberal and a gun owner and before I had two complex brain aneurysms and a stroke that was caused fixing one of them, I was a hunter. I’ve hiked more miles of creekbeds and ridges with a .270 or a .30-06 on my shoulder than any brave defender of the Second Amendment who takes his assault weapon into Chili’s ever thought about, and I’ve probably dropped and field-dressed more deer than they have, too – and I never needed anything but peep-sights to do it, either.

Over the weekend, two right-wing idiots got tired of waiting for the revolution that they have been promised was right around the corner every day that a Democrat has sat in the Oval office since 1980, and they decided that they would spark it off themselves.

Well, you know what they say – timing is everything, and they didn’t have it. They tried to start their revolution just hours before Mance Rayder’s army of wildings marched on The Wall, and tyranny – schmyranny. We wanted to see a giant riding a mammoth.

Two deluded morons – and in the information age, anyone with the capability to post nonsense to Facebook has the capability to verify basic facts and truths – decided they would light the fuse of the next American revolution themselves by murdering two police officers and desecrating their bodies with symbols of right-wing hatred and paranoia, a Gadsden Flag and a Swastika, and took a wanna-be hero out of the gene pool, too. (I have been trying to tell people since Wayne LaPierre made his childish “good guy/bad guy” proclamation that was a good way to get a lot of good-intentioned but untrained folks killed. Believe me yet?)

In the wake of the Newtown massacre, it really looked like something was going to get done. Fully 85% of Americans favored steps to rein in gun violence. But a year later, instead of common-sense legislation passing, there was a stand-off reminiscent of Waco brewing in Clark County, Nevada as a welfare cowboy with a sense of entitlement rivaled only by his racist tendencies drew nutjobs from around the country to his side, terrorizing the other residents of the area and pointing their guns at federal agents, seemingly without penalty.

Well, if no one else will say “enough, already” I will…

­Enough already. We have a right to own and bear arms, not artillery, and if you ask the average person on the street, they don’t want any part of the revolution the right wing is always ranting about. Truth be told, the thought scares the holy hell out of them, and they would gladly give up any last shreds of their – and our – remaining freedoms to see the “revolutionaries” crushed and swept away like so much (white) trash.

The nineties weren’t that long ago, and the body count doesn’t have to approach 168 for the population to say “Stop these freaks! By any means necessary!”

And here’s a word to the wise for any right wing nutjobs who might be reading…the side with the Air Force always wins. One A-10 would have scattered their little uprising at the Bundy hobby-farm while America watched the video on their phones over the backyard grill as they flipped burgers and drank beer and laughed at the idiotic gun-goons as they scattered like rats.

That that didn’t happen is all the evidence the rest of us need to prove they **aren’t** living under the yoke of tyranny and oppression, just because the President is a Democrat who managed to sign a healthcare reform law.  

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): Where have all the flowers gone?

10 Tuesday Jun 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

4th Comgressional District, missouri, Twitter, Vicky Hartzler

Representative Vicky Hartzler (r), via Twitter:

Rep. Vicky Hartzler ‏@RepHartzler

[….] I had fun collecting wild flowers today & making a pretty display of yarrow, spiderwort, & milkweed. [….]12:58 PM – 8 Jun 2014

Rep. Vicky Hartzler @RepHartzler

I spoke yesterday on my amendment that would require using highway funds for highways, not flowers. [….] 9:33 AM – 10 Jun 2014

Apparently there’s no need for yarrow, spiderwort and milkweed restoration along our federally funded highways.

Campaign Finance: What’s an increase in regressive taxes among friends anyway?

10 Tuesday Jun 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

campaign finance, intiative, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, transportation tax

Look who’s lining up and helping to pay the campaign bills.

Today, at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C131133 06/10/2014 MISSOURIANS FOR SAFE TRANSPORTATION & NEW JOBS INC APAC – Kansas Inc PO Box 23910 Overland Park KS 66283 6/9/2014 $25,000.00

C131133 06/10/2014 MISSOURIANS FOR SAFE TRANSPORTATION & NEW JOBS INC Jacobs Good Government Fund 1111 So Arroyo Parkway Pasadena CA 91105 6/10/2014 $25,000.00

C131133 06/10/2014 MISSOURIANS FOR SAFE TRANSPORTATION & NEW JOBS INC Burns & McDonnell Engineering Co Inc. PO Box 419173 4637 Charlotte Street Kansas City MO 64141 6/10/2014 $25,000.00

C131133 06/10/2014 MISSOURIANS FOR SAFE TRANSPORTATION & NEW JOBS INC Transystems Corporation 2400 Pershing Road Suite 400 Kansas City MO 64108 6/10/2014 $15,000.00

C131133 06/10/2014 MISSOURIANS FOR SAFE TRANSPORTATION & NEW JOBS INC Coastal Energy Corporation PO Box 218 Willow Springs MO 65793 6/10/2014 $7,500.00

[emphasis added]

We look forward to the ads and mail extolling the benefits of regressive taxation.

C131133: Missourians For Safe Transportation & New Jobs Inc

331 Madison Street Committee Type: Campaign

Jefferson City Mo 65102

[….] Established Date: 09/16/2013

[….]

Treasurer Bill Mckenna [….]

Deputy Treasurer Jewell Patek [….]

Ballot Measure History

Ballot Measures Election Date Subject Support/Oppose

Transportation Funding Initative 11/04/2014 Shall The Voters Increase The Sales Tax By One Cent Over 10 Years To Fund Improvements To The State’s Highway System & Other Transportation Projects./Statewide Support

[emphasis added]

I don’t think Missourians for Regressive Taxes was on the short list of committee names.

Previously:

Nix the sales tax: A question of fairness – and progessive identity (June 9, 2014)

Gov. Jay Nixon: “…This tax hike is neither a fair nor fiscally responsible solution…” (June 2, 2014)

Nix the sales tax: A question of fairness – and progessive identity

10 Tuesday Jun 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Claire McCaskill, missouri, sales tax, tax cuts, Tax policy, transportation infrastructure

So on the heels of a tax cut for the wealthy that insults every middle and working class person in the state of Missouri, the state legislature has the chutzpah to put a sales tax increase on the fall ballot in order to pay for transportation infrastructure. This tax, in common with sales taxes in general, falls most heavily on those who can least afford it. Rich folks who have the means to subsidize politicians and businesses that depend on our transportation infrastructure to thrive  will once again benefit from the poor man’s mite.

And our Democatic Senator, the wealthy Claire McCaskill, is all for taxing the  little guy while the fat cats get off. She thinks the sales tax is overdue, should have been enacted last year, although she realizes that, coming as it does on the heels of the rich man’s tax cut, the optics aren’t too great:

“Is it my first choice on how to fund transportation? Probably not. But it doesn’t mean that I’m not willing to support it. I will support it. Because we’ve got to get some additional revenue for our roads in Missouri,” McCaskill said. “They want to talk about what makes Missouri an attractive business climate, well funding higher education and having good roads and bridges are way more important than Rex Sinquefield’s plan to do away with everyone’s taxes entirely and make us all into Kansas.”

I admit it. McCaskill’s absolutely right about the need for revenue. But since I’ve been in Missouri I’ve seen one serious need after another addressed by proposals to increase the sales taxes that hit the poor man disproportionately – while the top tax rate in the state remained obscenely low. Now it’s even lower. If Missourians take McCaskill’s lead next November, we’ll continue to be stuck with ever more unfair sales taxes every time a new need is identified – desperate need, that is, since the GOP-dominated legislature is more than content to let the social and physical infrastructure of the state slide until the conditions are so dire action is unavoidable. Every time Democrats go along with a sales tax when serious, progressive tax reform is what is called for, we are helping to put finis to the vision of a state that is just and where prosperity is shared by all.

The Missourians who vote for these GOP bozos need to learn what happens when their elected representatives chose to favor wealthy political donors over the working people of the state. The lawmakers that enacted the mindnumbingly stupid tax cut need to be held accountable for their shortsided, ideologically driven behavior. That will only happen if we don’t bail them out by putting the burden on those least able to carry it. Sure, it’ll hurt for a while, but it’s the only way we’ll change the direction of our state.

No on the sales tax may even benefit the state’s economy since those at the bottom end of the economic spectrum tend to spend the money that they manage to keep in their pockets, stimulating growth. Rich folks, on the other hand, tend to sit on their excess moolah.

A headline in yesterday’s St. Louis Post-Dispatch says it all. Describing the recent Jefferson-Jackson Dinner, the headline proclaimed that “Democrats defend party principles at dinner here.” That’s right, not “assert” party principles, but, like sniveling losers, they attempt to “defend” themselves from the bullies who are picking on us all and who, if things continue as they are, will probably get away with it. Claire McCaskill is willing to concede defeat, leaving us worse off in order to deal with only one of the many problems the state faces – a serious problem, but if we endorse her postion, we’re shutting the door to a real solution in the future, a solution that is fair for all. We’re also telling the big baddies in the legislature that there’ll be no price to pay for taking us in the wrong direction. Vote no on the sales tax for the sake of Missouri’s future.

Campaign Finance: hedging your bets

09 Monday Jun 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Ameren Missouri, campaign finance, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission

Today, at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C000960 06/09/2014 MO DEMOCRATIC STATE COMMITTEE Ameren Missouri PO Box 66892 St Louis MO 63166 6/7/2014 $15,000.00

[emphasis added]

Five months ago:

C000953 01/08/2014 MO REPUBLICAN PARTY Ameren Missouri PO Box 66892 St Louis MO 63166 1/8/2014 $15,000.00

[emphasis added]

Fancy that.

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • Campaign Finance: Democracy
  • Campaign Finance: like they need the money
  • Choice in Missouri
  • Campaign Finance: “I, the billionaire”
  • Current status

Recent Comments

Steve Duane Phipps on No Kings – Warrensburg,…
No Kings – War… on Warrensburg, Missouri – No Kin…
Campaign Finance: pr… on Campaign Finance: for billiona…
Campaign Finance: wa… on About that ‘inconvenient…
Campaign Finance: ke… on About that ‘inconvenient…

Archives

  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,052,678 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...