• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Monthly Archives: January 2014

SB 718: Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?

17 Friday Jan 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

General Assembly, missouri, prevailing wage, SB 718

Say what?

A bill, filed in the Senate on January 14, 2014:

SECOND REGULAR SESSION

SENATE BILL NO. 718 [pdf]

97TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY

INTRODUCED BY SENATOR RICHARD.

Read 1st time January 14, 2014, and ordered printed.

TERRY L. SPIELER, Secretary.

5367S.01I

AN ACT

To repeal section 290.230, RSMo, and to enact in lieu thereof one new section relating to volunteer labor on public works projects.

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Missouri, as follows:

Section A. Section 290.230, RSMo, is repealed and one new section enacted in lieu thereof, to be known as section 290.230, to read as follows:

290.230. 1. Not less than the prevailing hourly rate of wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the work is performed, and not less than the prevailing hourly rate of wages for legal holiday and overtime work, shall be paid to all workmen employed by or on behalf of any public body engaged in the construction of public works, exclusive of maintenance work. Only such workmen as are directly employed by contractors or subcontractors in actual construction work on the site of the building or construction job shall be deemed to be employed upon public works. Any such workman who agrees in writing to volunteer his or her labor without pay shall not be deemed to be employed upon public works, and shall not be entitled to the prevailing hourly rate of wages.

2. When the hauling of materials or equipment includes some phase of construction other than the mere transportation to the site of the construction, workmen engaged in this dual capacity shall be deemed employed directly on public works.

[emphasis in original]

Think of the possibilities.

HB 1439: *JAPRWTNGB

17 Friday Jan 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

General Assembly, gun, HB 1439, missouri, nullification, tenther

*just another paranoid right wingnut tenther nullification gun bill

Previously: HB 436: loonier than Wayne LaPierre at a press conference (February 15, 2013)

They’re nothing, if not predictable. A bill, filed on January 15, 2013:

SECOND REGULAR SESSION

HOUSE BILL NO. 1439

97TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY

INTRODUCED BY REPRESENTATIVES FUNDERBURK (Sponsor), JONES (110), SPENCER, WALKER, COX, BROWN, MCCAHERTY, FRANKLIN, SOMMER, LOVE, BAHR, PARKINSON, GATSCHENBERGER, SCHARNHORST, ROWLAND, GOSEN, HINSON, WILSON, MESSENGER, KELLEY (127), BRATTIN, KOLKMEYER, HIGDON, POGUE, DAVIS, FLANIGAN, PIKE, DUGGER, CURTMAN, KORMAN, HANSEN, HOUGHTON, WIELAND AND BLACK (Co-sponsors).

5129L.01I          D. ADAM CRUMBLISS, Chief Clerk

AN ACT

To repeal sections 1.320, 21.750, 571.030, 571.070, 571.101, 571.107, 571.117, and 590.010, RSMo, and to enact in lieu thereof fifteen new sections relating to firearms, with penalty provisions and a contingent effective date for certain sections.

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the state of Missouri, as follows:

1.320. 1. This section shall be known and may be cited as the “Second Amendment Preservation Act”.

           2. The general assembly finds and declares that:

           (1) The general assembly of the state of Missouri is firmly resolved to support and defend the United States Constitution against every aggression, either foreign or domestic, and is duty bound to oppose every infraction of those principles which constitute the basis of the Union of the States because only a faithful observance of those principles can secure the nation’s existence and the public happiness;

           (2) Acting through the United States Constitution, the people of the several states created the federal government to be their agent in the exercise of a few defined powers, while reserving to the state governments the power to legislate on matters which concern the lives, liberties, and properties of citizens in the ordinary course of affairs;

           (3) The limitation of the federal government’s power is affirmed under the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which defines the total scope of federal power as being that which has been delegated by the people of the several states to the federal government, and all power not delegated to the federal government in the Constitution of the United States is reserved to the states respectively, or to the people themselves;

           (4) Whenever the federal government assumes powers that the people did not grant it in the Constitution, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force;

           (5) The several states of the United States of America respect the proper role of the federal government, but reject the proposition that such respect requires unlimited submission. If the government, created by compact among the states, was the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers granted to it by the states through the Constitution, the federal government’s discretion, and not the Constitution, would necessarily become the measure of those powers. To the contrary, as in all other cases of compacts among powers having no common judge, each party has an equal right to judge for itself as to when infractions of the compact have occurred, as well as to determine the mode and measure of redress. Although the several states have granted supremacy to laws and treaties made pursuant to the powers granted in the Constitution, such supremacy does not extend to various federal statutes, executive orders, administrative orders, court orders, rules, regulations, or other actions which restrict or prohibit the manufacture, ownership, and use of firearms, firearm accessories, or ammunition exclusively within the borders of Missouri; such statutes, executive orders, administrative orders, court orders, rules, regulations, and other actions exceed the powers granted to the federal government except to the extent they are necessary and proper for governing and regulating of land and naval forces of the United States or for organizing, arming, and disciplining of militia forces actively employed in the service of the United States Armed Forces;

           (6) The people of the several states have given Congress the power “to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states”, but “regulating commerce” does not include the power to limit citizens’ right to keep and bear arms in defense of their families, neighbors, persons, or property, or to dictate as to what sort of arms and accessories law-abiding, mentally competent Missourians may buy, sell, exchange, or otherwise possess within the borders of this state;

           (7) The people of the several states have also granted Congress the power “to lay and collect taxes, duties, imports, and excises, to pay the debts, and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States” and “to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the powers vested by the Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or office thereof”. These constitutional provisions merely identify the means by which the federal government may execute its limited powers and ought not to be so construed as themselves to grant unlimited powers because to do so would be to destroy the carefully constructed equilibrium between the federal and state governments. Consequently, the general assembly rejects any claim that the taxing and spending powers of Congress can be used to diminish in any way the right of the people to keep and bear arms;

           (8) The people of Missouri have vested the general assembly with the authority to regulate the manufacture, possession, exchange, and use of firearms within the borders of this state, subject only to the limits imposed by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution and the Missouri Constitution; and

[….]

3. (1) All federal acts, laws, executive orders, administrative orders, court orders, rules, and regulations, whether past, present, or future, which infringe on the people’s right to keep and bear arms as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 23 of the Missouri Constitution shall be invalid in this state, shall not be recognized by this state, shall be specifically rejected by this state, and shall be considered null and void and of no effect in this state.

           (2) Such federal acts, laws, executive orders, administrative orders, court orders, rules, and regulations include, but are not limited to:

           (a) Any tax, levy, fee, or stamp imposed on firearms, firearm accessories, or ammunition not common to all other goods and services which might reasonably be expected to create a chilling effect on the purchase or ownership of those items by law-abiding citizens;

           (b) Any registering or tracking of firearms, firearm accessories, or ammunition which might reasonably be expected to create a chilling effect on the purchase or ownership of those items by law-abiding citizens;

           (c) Any registering or tracking of the owners of firearms, firearm accessories, or ammunition which might reasonably be expected to create a chilling effect on the purchase or ownership of those items by law-abiding citizens;

           (d) Any act forbidding the possession, ownership, or use or transfer of a firearm, firearm accessory, or ammunition by law-abiding citizens; and

           (e) Any act ordering the confiscation of firearms, firearm accessories, or ammunition from law-abiding citizens.

           4. It shall be the duty of the courts and law enforcement agencies of this state to protect the rights of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms within the borders of this state and to protect these rights from the infringements defined in subsection 3 of this section.

           5. No public officer or employee of this state shall have authority to enforce or attempt to enforce any law, statute, ordinance, or order of any court infringing on the right to keep and bear arms as defined in subsection 3 of this section.

           6. (1) Any entity or person who knowingly, as defined in section 562.061, attempts to enforce any of the infringements of the right to keep and bear arms included in subsection 3 of this section or otherwise knowingly deprives a citizen of Missouri of the rights or privileges ensured by the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution or Section 23 of Article I of the Missouri Constitution, while acting under the color of any state or federal law, shall be liable to the injured party in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress.

           (2) In such action, the court may award the prevailing party, other than the state of Missouri or any political subdivision of the state, reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.

           (3) Neither sovereign nor official or qualified immunity shall be an affirmative defense in such cases.

           7. Any official, agent, or employee of the United States government who enforces or attempts to enforce any of the infringements on the right to keep and bear arms included in subsection 3 of this section is guilty of a class A misdemeanor. Missouri law enforcement officers shall have the discretionary power to appropriately interpose on behalf of law-abiding citizens, including the power to levy charges or arrest such officials, agents, or employees of the United States government.

           8. For the purposes of this section, the term “law-abiding citizen” shall mean a person who is not otherwise precluded under state law from possessing a firearm and shall not be construed to include anyone who is not legally present in the United States or the state of Missouri.

[….]

[emphasis in original]

Meh, just what everyone needs right now, more tenther drivel.

Rep. Rick Brattin (r): Ready! Fire! Aim!

16 Thursday Jan 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

General Assembly, HB 1469, HB 1470, HB 1471, HB 1472, HB 1474, HB 1476, missouri, Rick Brattin

We’ve noticed something of a punitive theme therein.

Representative Rick Brattin (r) [file photo].

A few of the bills introduced today by Representative Rick Brattin (r):

HB 1469

Requires all employers and business entities to enroll and actively participate in a federal work authorization program and imposes stricter penalties for employing an unauthorized alien

Sponsor: Brattin, Rick (055)

Co-Sponsor: Berry, T.J. (038) … et al.

Proposed Effective Date: 1/1/2015

LR Number: 5213L.01I

Last Action: 01/16/2014 – Introduced and Read First Time (H)

Bill String: HB 1469

Next Hearing: Hearing not scheduled

Calendar: Bill currently not on a House calendar

What’s supposed to happen if you hire a baby sitter?

HB 1470

Allows the department of corrections to administer a judgment of death by firing squad

Sponsor: Brattin, Rick (055)

Co-Sponsor: Fitzwater, Paul (144) … et al.

Proposed Effective Date: 8/28/2014

LR Number: 5440H.01I

Last Action: 01/16/2014 – Introduced and Read First Time (H)

Bill String: HB 1470

Next Hearing: Hearing not scheduled

Calendar: Bill currently not on a House calendar

Blindfold optional? Just asking. We suppose what you lose in cleanup costs can be made up in execution drug cost savings.

HB 1471

Requires all inmates receiving an on-site non-emergency medical examination or treatment from correctional center personnel to be charged fifty cents per visit

Sponsor: Brattin, Rick (055)

Co-Sponsor: Fitzwater, Paul (144) … et al.

Proposed Effective Date: 8/28/2014

LR Number: 5437H.01I

Last Action: 01/16/2014 – Introduced and Read First Time (H)

Bill String: HB 1471

Next Hearing: Hearing not scheduled

Calendar: Bill currently not on a House calendar

Obamacare!

HB 1472

Requires schools teaching the theory of evolution by natural selection to have a policy on parental notification and a mechanism for opting out of such instruction

Sponsor: Brattin, Rick (055)

Co-Sponsor: Koenig, Andrew (099) … et al.

Proposed Effective Date: 8/28/2014

LR Number: 5303L.01I

Last Action: 01/16/2014 – Introduced and Read First Time (H)

Bill String: HB 1472

Next Hearing: Hearing not scheduled

Calendar: Bill currently not on a House calendar

The FSM will be pleased. Or not.

HB 1474

Authorizes any school district to designate a teacher or administrator as a school protection officer who may carry concealed firearms after he or she has met specified minimum training requiremen

Sponsor: Brattin, Rick (055)

Co-Sponsor: Kelley, Mike (127) … et al.

Proposed Effective Date: 8/28/2014

LR Number: 4939H.01I

Last Action: 01/16/2014 – Introduced and Read First Time (H)

Bill String: HB 1474

Next Hearing: Hearing not scheduled

Calendar: Bill currently not on a House calendar

Minimum. That sounds like a recipe for something…

HB 1476

Requires the issuance of a 30-day temporary nondriver’s license in order for the Department of Revenue to verify the identity and citizenship of the applicant

Sponsor: Brattin, Rick (055)

Co-Sponsor: Koenig, Andrew (099) … et al.

Proposed Effective Date: 8/28/2014

LR Number: 4940H.01I

Last Action: 01/16/2014 – Introduced and Read First Time (H)

Bill String: HB 1476

Next Hearing: Hearing not scheduled

Calendar: Bill currently not on a House calendar

There’s got to be some sort of fascinating paranoid right wingnut story in this somewhere.  

Campaign Finance: Party, party, party!

16 Thursday Jan 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

campaign finance, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission

Today, at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C061621 01/16/2014 MO COLLEGE REPUBLICANS Tony Feather 2720 Tanglewood Dr. Jefferson City MO 65109 Partner in FLS Connect 10/23/2013 $16,000.00

[emphasis added]

That looks to be pretty close the the annual operating budget of the Missouri Democratic Party.

Early morning in Missouri

16 Thursday Jan 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

missouri

This morning in west central Missouri.

Campaign Finance: Schupp (D) and Lamping (r) in the 24th Senate District – 4th quarter 2013

16 Thursday Jan 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

2014, 24th Senate District, campaign finance, Jill Schupp, John Lamping, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission

Previously:

Campaign Finance: Schupp (D) and Lamping (r) in the 24th Senate District – 3rd quarter 2013 (October 21, 2013)

Let’s hope that the GOP reaps what John Lamping sows. (January 15, 2014)

He’s super-villain clever, he is! (January 14, 2014)

Representative Jill Schupp (D) on the House floor in Jefferson City – January 8, 2014.

Representative Jill Schupp (D), 88th Legislative District, representing most of Creve Coeur and Olivette, and parts of Ladue, Frontenac, Town & Country and Chesterfield, is a candidate for the 24th Senate District seat currently held by John Lamping (r). The 24th Senate District encompasses part of St. Louis County. The fourth quarter 2013 campaign finance reports have been filed with the Missouri Ethics Commission.

The overall numbers, first, for Jill Schupp (D):

C131081: Schupp For Senate

418 North Mosley Road Committee Type: Candidate

Creve Coeur Mo 63141 Party Affiliation: Democrat

[….] Established Date: 06/03/2013

  Termination Date:

Information Reported On: 2014 – January Quarterly Report

Beginning Money on Hand $177,583.38

Monetary Receipts + $103,154.00

Monetary Expenditures – $18,235.24

Contributions Made – $0.00

Other Disbursements – $1,300.00

Subtotal     $83,618.76

Ending Money On Hand   $261,202.14

[emphasis added]

That’s a healthy fundraising quarter. And a healthy cash on hand.

The overall numbers for John Lamping (r), the incumbent:

C091263: Lamping For Senate

#2 Warson Hills Committee Type: Candidate

St Louis Mo 63124 Party Affiliation: Republican

[….] Established Date: 10/27/2009

  Termination Date:

Information Reported On: 2014 – January Quarterly Report

Beginning Money on Hand $7,790.94

Monetary Receipts + $3,000.00

Monetary Expenditures – $463.23

Contributions Made – $450.00

Other Disbursements – $0.00

Subtotal     $2,086.77

Ending Money On Hand   $9,877.71

[emphasis added]

Okay, he’s definitely not running for reelection. Not with numbers like that.

So, at this point Representative Jill Schupp (D) has amassed a significant amount of resources for her senate campaign. No other republican has openly declared their candidacy.

Some of the details in Representative Schupp’s campaign finance report:  

CONTRIBUTIONS AND LOANS RECEIVED

SCHUPP FOR SENATE [pdf] 1/15/2014

13. TOTAL MONETARY CONTRIBUTIONS RECEIVED FROM PERSONS GIVING $100 OR LESS $6,672.00

CONTRIBUTIONS RECEIVED – SUPPLEMENTAL

[….]

Eastern Missouri Laborers’ Educational & Benevolent Fund

3450 Hollenberg Drive

Bridgeton MO 63044

10/4/2013 $1,000.00

[….]

Jackson County Democratic Committee

4019 Clark Ave

Kansas City MO 64111

11/5/2013 $250.00

[….]

Susan Talve

5020 Waterman Avenue

St. Louis MO 63108

Central Reform Congregation — Rabbi

11/11/2013 $250.00

[….]

William H. Danforth

10 Glenview Road

St. Louis MO 63124

Retired

11/12/2013 $1,000.00

[….]

Margaret Donnelly

68 Lake Forest Dr.

St. Louis MO 63117

SLU School of Law — Practitioner-in-residence

11/13/2013 $250.00

[….]

Electrical Workers Voluntary Political

5850 Elizabeth Ave

St Louis MO 63110

11/13/2013 $250.00

[….]

AFSCME Missouri PEOPLE

2419 B Hyde Park Rd

Jefferson City MO 65109

11/14/2013 $1,000.00

[….]

Jean Carnahan

312 N. Meramec Ave

St. Louis MO 63105

Retired

11/15/2013 $250.00

Teamsters Local 541

4501 Emmanuel Cleaver II Blvd

Kansas City MO 64130

11/15/2013 $200.00

[….]

Teamsters Local Union 688 PAC

4349 Woodson Rd

St Louis MO 63134

11/25/2013 $400.00

UFCW Local 655 Elect Political Fund

300 Weidman Rd

Manchester MO 63011

11/25/2013 $800.00

Teamsters Local 610 Political Action Committee

11472 Schenk Dr

Maryland Heights MO 63043

11/25/2013 $200.00

[….]

Teamsters Local 618 Drive Fund PAC

9040 Lackland Rd

St Louis MO 63114

11/25/2013 $200.00

Teamsters Local 6 Political Action Fund

2650 Wisconsin Ave

St Louis MO 63118

11/25/2013 $200.00

Teamsters Local 838 Political Action Fund

4501 Emanuel Cleaver II Blvd

Kansas City MO 64130

11/25/2013 $200.00

Teamsters 245 PAF

1850 E. Division St

Springfield MO 65803

11/25/2013 $200.00

[….]

Teamsters Local 823 Political Action Fund

PO Box 1299

Joplin MO 64802

11/25/2013 $200.00

Teamsters Local 682 PAC

5730 Elizabeth Ave

St Louis MO 63110

11/25/2013 $200.00

[….]

IBEW Local 53 Voluntary Political Fund

1100 East Admiral Boulevard

Kansas City MO 64106

11/26/2013 $500.00

[….]

Teamsters Local #955 Political Action Fund

4501 Emanuel Cleaver II Blvd.

Kansas City MO 64130

11/30/2013 $200.00

[….]

Gas Workers Local 5-6 Voluntary PAC

7750 Olive Blvd

St. Louis MO 63130

12/5/2013 $200.00

[….]

Teamsters Local 600 DRIVE PAC

161 Weldon Parkway

Maryland Heights MO 63043

12/6/2013 $200.00

Teamsters Local 41

4501 Emanuel Cleaver II Blvd

Kansas City MO 64130

12/9/2013 $500.00

[….]

IUOE Local 513 Political & Educational Fund

3449 Hollenberg Drive

Bridgeton MO 63044

12/13/2013 $500.00

[….]

Plumbers and Pipe Fitters Local 562 Voluntary Charity &

Defense Fund

12385 Larimore Road

St. Louis MO 63138

12/19/2013 $500.00

Missouri State U.A.W. PAC

721 Dunn Road

Hazelwood MO 63042

12/19/2013 $500.00

[….]

Missouri State Council of Machinist PAC

12365 St. Charles Rock Rd

St Louis MO 63044

12/21/2013 $250.00

[….]

Supporters of Health Research & Treatments

PO Box 11591

St. Louis MO 63105

12/28/2013 $2,000.00

[….]

Branch 343 National Association of Letter Carriers

Political Action Fund

2225 Blendon Pl

St. Louis MO 63143

12/30/2013 $250.00

[….]

Judy Baker

3075 S. Rangeline Road

Columbia MO 65201

Self — Consultant

12/30/2013 $100.00

[….]

IBEW Local 124 Voluntary Political Fund

301 East 103rd Terrace

Kansas City MO 64114

11/5/2013 $250.00

[….]

[emphasis added]

Working people! And a lot more.

And for Senator John Lamping (r):

CONTRIBUTIONS AND LOANS RECEIVED

LAMPING FOR SENATE [pdf] 1/14/2014

Luxco

5050 Kemper Ave

St Louis MO 63139

11/7/2013 $1,500.00

Noranda Aluminum Inc

391 St Jude Industrial park

New madrid MO 63869

10/16/2013 $1,500.00

[….]

13. TOTAL MONETARY CONTRIBUTIONS RECEIVED FROM PERSONS GIVING $100 OR LESS $0.00

[….]

[emphasis added]

That’s it. All of the contributions.

Let’s hope that the GOP reaps what John Lamping sows.

16 Thursday Jan 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

ACA, Affordable Care Act, Cato Institute, HB1314, John Lamping, Keith Frederick, Michael Cannon, missouri, Obamacare, SB546

By now you’ve probably read lots about State Rep. John Lamping’s (R-24) lame attempt to launch the latest Missouri Republican attack on Obamacare. If you haven’t, you’ll find a good description of the bill and the issues it involves in this write-up by Gloria Bilchik at Occasional Planet, while Blue Girl here at SMP puts Lamping’s legislative chops into perfect perspective – as in “I loathe scum like Lamping with every fiber of my being and can’t imagine what it must feel like to be so empty inside, so bereft of humanity and kindness, so meanspirited, venal and utterly contemptible, so vapid, insipid, petty and trite”. I’m pretty sure she disapproves.

Blue Girl also acknowledges something else we all know which is that this exercise in radical rightwingery hasn’t a ghost of a chance of passing in even our GOP-heavy legislature – there are actually a few constitutional realists among the GOP crazies in Jefferson City – or being signed by our reasonably sane Democratic Governor should the unthinkable occur. And the case against the legislation’s viability was further bolstered by a judicial decision handed down today by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

Lamping’s bill, SB546 (and companion House legislation introduced by  Rep. Keith Frederick (R-121), HB1314), was inspired by the Cato Institute’s Michael Cannon, who has encouraged lawsuits arguing based on the argument that the subsidies offered to low and middle income Americans on the federal exchange violate the law as it is written. As Ezra Klein notes:

The dispute settles around a single sentence: The Affordable Care Act’s defining a health insurance exchange, in Section 1311, as a “governmental agency or nonprofit entity that is established by a state.” Since the law says subsidies only go to people buying insurance “through an Exchange established by the State under 1311,” Cannon and some others argue that the federal exchanges, though specifically envisioned in the law, can’t receive subsidies.

Today’s verdict is the first to come down and it, tellingly, doesn’t endorse Cannon’s logic:

Judge Paul L. Friedman called that argument “unpersuasive,” saying it didn’t pass legal muster and ran counter to the central purpose of the Affordable Care Act.

“Plaintiffs’ proposed construction in this case – that tax credits are available only for those purchasing insurance from state-run Exchanges – runs counter to this central purpose of the ACA: to provide affordable health care to virtually all Americans,” Friedman wrote in a 39-page decision. “Such an interpretation would violate the basic rule of statutory construction that a court must interpret a statute in light of its history and purpose.”

His reasoning? The federal exchanges — which the Obama administration is constructing for 34 states that declined to build their own — “would have no customers, and no purpose” if the challengers’ logic were adopted.

Of course, this is just the first verdict in one of several lawsuits, but it doesn’t look too good for folks who think they’ve found the perfect, last-ditch, anti-Obamacare wriggle.

What this means in practical terms for Missouri progressives, as far as I’m concerned, is that John Lamping has given the state’s Democrats a big, fat, no-risk gift right before the mid-term elections. While Blue Girl notes that SB546 is “going nowhere, except in our file of stuff to use against the neoconfederates next election cycle,” we shouldn’t underestimate the good we can do with that file or just how potent this particular bit of GOP chicanery could prove to be when it comes to next fall’s elections.

At the end of December 33,138 Missourians or 5.04%  of the estimated eligible population had enrolled in private plans through the federal Website, Healthcare.gov. That number will undoubtedly grow massively in the next three months – in spite of statewide GOP efforts at obstruction – and, as the St. Louis Post-Dispatch noted about earlier numbers, many of these new enrollees will also be eligible for the subsidies that Lamping says he wants to take away.

Lamping must think he’s got a winner here, but if I were one of those folks getting acquainted with Obamacare via my first-time healthcare coverage and finally learning how empty the last three-years of GOP scare-tactics were, I wouldn’t feel too friendly toward jerks who were trying to make sure that I couldn’t afford to pay for it. It could be a relatively short jump from John Lamping to the entire Missouri GOP – particularly in view of their past, desperate anti-Obamacare rhetoric. We’ve just got to get the word out about who it is who doesn’t care if Missourians live or die.

3rd paragraph edited slightly for clarity: (see striken test), and for accuracy: “federal” added before exchange.

 

Rep. Vicky Hartzler (r): and that’s just in your own caucus

16 Thursday Jan 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

4th Congressional District, missouri, Twitter, Vicky Hartzler

Representative Vicky Hartzler (r), today, via Twitter:

Rep. Vicky Hartzler ‏@RepHartzler

I thought I’d send this pretty picture of the Capitol I took this morning. It’s a privilege to work here. [….] 7:09 AM – 15 Jan 2014

And one reply:

Carl ‏@CrushTheCFR

@RepHartzler Yeah but you’re surrounded by thieves, hustlers and morons. 7:10 AM – 15 Jan 2014

Slow pitch, over the plate.

Campaign Finance: meet me in St. Louis

15 Wednesday Jan 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

2016, Attorney General, Chris Koster, governor, missouri

Today, at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C031159 01/15/2014 MISSOURIANS FOR KOSTER Thompson Coburn LLP One US Bank Plaza Saint Louis MO 63101 1/13/2014 $10,000.00

[emphasis added]

$10,000.00 is nothing to sneeze at. Still, it’s not $100,000.00 in one fell swoop.  

Ed Martin’s private reality

15 Wednesday Jan 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

ACA, Affordable Care Act, Ed Martin, missouri, Obamacare, Republican propaganda

The Chair of the Missouri Republican Party, Ed Martin, has a problem with the reality that the rest of us inhabit. The proof? Read his oddly gloating statement about the Obamacare signup numbers that were released Monday. He starts cute:

The truth hurts; at least it hurts everyday Missourians and millions around the country. Another month of enrollment numbers brings another announcement from the Administration cloaking the colossal failure that is ObamaCare.

“The truth hurts”? Give me a break. Is Martin trying to say that the numbers aren’t accurate? If so, where’s his proof? Or is Martin really so dense that he  believes the fact that total enrollments doubled in December constitutes some type of failure? In fact, this new evidence that the early rollout hiccups are now in the past inspired The Wasington Post‘s Ezra Klein to announce that we’re seeing the “death of Obamacare’s death spiral,” – you, know, that “death spiral” that folks like Martin have been heralding for the last three months.

Seems to me that the main thing that the new numbers tell us is that lots of folks have managed to get healthcare coverage, many for the first time. But that type of success doesn’t concern Ed Martin:

No amount of repairs to a website, or new rules meant to shore up ObamaCare’s failed policy, will fix the problem the law created for countless Americans that lost theirs plans through no fault of their own.

 

And this is where the truth actually does hurt – only the wounded entity is Ed Martin’s credibility. As Patrick Caldwell notes in Mother Jones, the truth “turns out to be a tad more complicated” than the rote talking points of GOPers like Martin suggest:

… . On New Year’s Eve, the Democratic minority on the House Energy and Commerce Committee released a report examining exactly how many people will lack health insurance under the new regime. The report uses an Associated Press estimate that 4.7 million people received cancellation notices as their baseline. But out of that group, according to the Democrats, only a small sliver of Americans-just 10,000 people-who lost their 2013 coverage won’t have access to affordable insurance.

“Previous false claims have included the assertion that the law requires death panels, that the law represents a government take over of health care, and that law has caused millions to lose their jobs,” the report says. “The assertion that the law will cause five million individuals who currently have coverage in the individual market to go without coverage in 2014 is similarly baseless.”

But Martin’s got more: He’s sure that the risk pool among the new enrollees is so unbalanced it will bring the whole Obamacare edifice tumbling down:

By the White House’s own admission, the young and healthy will have to shoulder the burden of ObamaCare. Today’s numbers show young Americans are avoiding the mandate at a significant rate. The White House continues to hide key data points by refusing to release the number of Americans that have actually paid for plans selected through the federal marketplace. What are they hiding?

However, as Klein notes, Ed’s worries about the ratio of young enrollees to older, sicker folks is a tad premature:

But — and this can’t be emphasized enough — this is not the final risk pool. No one anywhere expected that the risk pool would be balanced by Jan. 1. Major health laws always follow the same pattern: The people who badly need insurance sign up first, and they tend to be older and sicker. Younger people sign up later — typically right before the penalty hits. So far, the age pattern in Obamacare enrollment is tracking the age pattern in enrollment for the Massachusetts reforms quite closely.

In fact, as Klein notes, it may take up to three years to sort out the risk pool to the point that we actually understand how well the system will function. At any rate, the current ratio of young to older enrollees is actually not, as it stands, an insurmountable problem according to Larry Levitt, Senior Vice-President of the Kaiser Foundation:

Even if the current mix of enrollees holds, Levitt does not foresee a shock to the insurance system, with only a potential 2 to 3 percent increase in premiums in 2015. “I see no signs at this point of a feared premium ‘death spiral,’ ” in which premiums skyrocket and the system collapses, he says.

Nor is the failure to tell us how many enrollees have paid for their plans a real issue. Just the teensy-tiniest bit of reflection might suggest that it’s a bit too early to get meaningful figures – many new enrollees haven’t even had time to receive billing statements. Perhaps Martin should dry his crocodile tears and ask again in a few months.

It’s Martin’s closing grace notes, however, that are really special:

When America judges this administration, when it’s all said and done, this law will undoubtedly be the downfall of a historic presidency.

Who’d of thought that Martin would be so worried about the legacy of the black man in the white house, the same guy who’s kept Martin and his co-partisans so lathered up during the last five years that they’ve clearly lost touch with the real world.

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • Johnson County Democrats – Knob Noster Fair Parade – May 28, 2026
  • Campaign Finance: once again, so they get it
  • Disrespect
  • “Ooh, ooh! Pick me! Pick me!”
  • Campaign Finance: Oxymoron

Recent Comments

Uh, in case you were… on Some right wingnuts with money…
Winning at losing… on Passing the gas – Donald…
TACO Tuesday | Show… on TACO or Mushrooms?
TACO Tuesday | Show… on So much winning
So much winning | Sh… on Passing the gas – Donald…

Archives

  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,049,210 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...