• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Monthly Archives: January 2014

HB 1391: send in the clowns

15 Wednesday Jan 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

clowns, General Assembly, HB 1391, missouei, rodeo

Ironic on so many levels.

“…And where are the clowns?

There ought to be clowns.

Well, maybe next year.”

A bill, filed today, on pressing business:

HB 1391

Guarantees the right to conduct and participate in rodeos in this state

Sponsor: Hurst, Tom (062)

Co-Sponsor: Schieffer, Ed (041) … et al.

Proposed Effective Date: 8/28/2014

LR Number: 5215H.01I

Last Action: 01/14/2014 – Introduced and Read First Time (H)

[emphasis added]

Really?

“Useless laws weaken the necessary laws.” – Charles-Louis de Secondat, baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu (1689 – 1755)

Previously: Of state fair rodeo announcers and clowns: res ipsa loquitur (August 12, 2014)

HB 1375, HB 1379: a priority

15 Wednesday Jan 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

abortion, Chuck Gatschenberger, General Assembly, HB 1375, HB 1379, missouri, Stanley Cox

A couple of abortion bills introduced in the House today:

HB 1375

Requires any organization, institution, or facility which performs abortions to make an annual accounting of all funds received pursuant to Title X of the federal Public Health Service Act

Sponsor: Cox, Stanley (052)

Co-Sponsor: Muntzel, Dave (048) … et al.

Proposed Effective Date: 8/28/2014

LR Number: 5068H.01I

Last Action: 01/14/2014 – Introduced and Read First Time (H)

[emphasis added]

HB 1379

Requires an ultrasound to be conducted and reviewed with the pregnant woman prior to the 24-hour waiting period for an abortion

Sponsor: Gatschenberger, Chuck (108)

Co-Sponsor: Hicks, Ron (107) … et al.

Proposed Effective Date: 8/28/2014

LR Number: 5405H.01I

Last Action: 01/14/2014 – Introduced and Read First Time (H)

[emphasis added]

Previously:

SB 519, HB 1307, HB 1313: wait, wait, wait (January 12, 2014)

Government as doctor

I thought one of the reasons Republicans hate Obamacare is because some bureaucrat comes between you and your doctor.

I guess they still believe that as long as you don’t have a vagina.

Uh, yep.

He’s super-villain clever, he is!

15 Wednesday Jan 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

By @BginKC

Too bad The Punisher is already taken, because state Senator John Lamping of Ladue has figured out how to save us from the Socialist hordes in Washington, headed up by Barack Obama and John Roberts, and punishing poor and middle class people along the way? Hey, that’s a feature, not a bug. He has filed a bill that would make it law that the license to do business of any insurance company that complies with the federal Affordable Care Act and files the paperwork for premium support subsidies for their customers…would be suspended.

Lamping just isn’t ready to give up on the dream of kicking a whole bunch of people off health insurance. Shutting down the government didn’t work. Holding the Senate hostage didn’t work. Eleventy-billion irrelevant votes to repeal didn’t work. But by-gawd, Lamping is smarter than everybody! He’s got this shizzle all figured out.

The bill would suspend insurance companies’ state licenses if they accepted subsidies offered by the federal government to help pay health insurance premiums for low- and middle-income Missourians.

Lamping contends the subsidies are illegal and eventually will be thrown out by a federal court. By rejecting them, he said, Missouri could remove the trigger in the federal law that, beginning in 2015, will assess penalties against large employers that don’t provide health insurance.

“This is a legislative way by which the state actually could push back” against the law, Lamping said.

Critics of Lamping’s plan say that the Affordable Care Act is helping people obtain health insurance and that it’s time to stop fighting it. The bill would “just throw a wrench in the whole situation, slow everything down,” said Sen. Gina Walsh, D-Bellefontaine Neighbors.

The insurance industry is watching the bill closely.

“We’re kinda caught in the middle,” said Brent Butler, government affairs director for the Missouri Insurance Coalition. “We’ve spent three years since the adoption of the Affordable Care Act informing everybody of the changes that will happen in the marketplace. This might add more questions than answers.”

Never fear! Lamping’s here! He will save you from the scourge of health insurance by shutting down companies that try to comply with the federal law! They won’t be doing business in Missouri if the comply with the dastardly Obamacare!

The federal law provides subsidies for people earning up to 400 percent of the poverty level, or $78,120 for a family of three.

In Missouri, two companies are participating in the exchange: Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield, which is operated by Wellpoint, and Coventry Health Care Inc., which was acquired by Aetna last year.

Lamping said he got the idea for his bill suspending the insurers’ licenses from Michael Cannon, a health policy scholar at the libertarian Cato Institute in Washington.

Cannon traveled the country, encouraging states not to set up insurance exchanges. He argued that employers would have a solid legal foundation to contest any penalties in states with federally run exchanges.

The strategy is based on a contention that the Affordable Care Act allows the federal government to give out health insurance premium subsidies only if the insurance exchange is run by the state.

Several lawsuits advance that argument, including Halbig vs. Sebelius, which is pending in federal district court in the District of Columbia. It cites a section of the law that says subsidies apply to policies purchased “through an exchange established by the state.”

The act’s defenders say Congress intended the subsidies to apply to all qualified people and the lawsuits take provisions out of context. Any drafting errors can be fixed by regulation, the law’s supporters say.

Lamping said Missourians have made their distaste for the law clear, and he is trying to put teeth into Missouri’s resistance to its provisions.

“Clearly, in Missouri, there’s a very strong sense that they don’t want this law,” he said.

You know how I say it’s hard to be from here sometimes? This is the sort of stupid shit I mean. Lamping is a Tenth Amendment wingnut (he should give the Ninth Amendment a read some time)  who still insists the law is unconstitutional, even tho it’s been upheld be the Supreme Court.  People have been gulled by liars and ideologues and Fox News and Rush Limbaugh into thinking they don’t want the law, but when asked about the individual provisions of the law – hell, when asked if they prefer the ACA or Obamacare – the ACA and the individual elements of the law are popular. People like the idea of kids being able to stay on their parents insurance through Law, Medical or Dental school. They like the idea of their sister with a pre-existing condition being able to buy insurance at an affordable rate. They like the idea of subsidies to help them pay the premium. They understand that all the stuff they like depends on the mandate, everyone in.

Lamping makes a fatal error…his hubris is his downfall. He thinks that the people outstate are stupid, and they’re not. They voted the way the republicans wanted them to in a couple of low-turnout primaries that had the questions about the ACA on the ballot. I voted on the losing side of both those issues, and can attest to the fact that the ballot language was leading and the powers-that-be on the GOP side of things in this state simply operated on the assumption that the law would be struck down as unconstitutional; and in the year-and-a-half since it was upheld by the Supreme Court, they haven’t been able to switch gears and accept the law as valid, legal, and constitutional. So they are left to snap and snarl like zombies…this is a “bad law” that is “unconstitutional” and they refuse to accept the ruling of a Republican-majority Supreme Court.

Now let’s get real – Lamping’s bill isn’t going anywhere. This post is more tossing the toad in the air and whacking it with a Louisville Slugger, except I would never do that for real, only metaphorically and only to a republican asshat who richly deserves every ounce of derision and scorn I can muster. I loathe scum like Lamping with every fiber of my being and can’t imagine what it must feel like to be so empty inside, so bereft of humanity and kindness, so meanspirited, venal and utterly contemptible, so vapid, insipid, petty and trite. He is what I’m talking about when I say that the “war on poverty” has shifter and morphed to a war on poor people. It is being waged by willing conspirators like Lamping. In another time and place, he would surely have been a Capo.

But like I said, this is going nowhere, except in our file of stuff to use against the neoconfederates next election cycle. The Governor is a Democrat with a veto-proof General Assembly, so even if this bill miraculously got a committee hearing, made it out of committee, made it through the Senate, went to the General Assembly, made it through the committee process and onto the floor and passed the House, Governor Nixon would veto it and the Republicans lack the votes to override, and that is presuming a suspension of the supremacy clause, which says federal law supercedes state law – even in Missouri.

Campaign Finance: “…pawn to queen’s bishop three…”

14 Tuesday Jan 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

campaign finance, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, Rex Sinquefield, Tom Dempsey

Today, at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C061726 01/14/2014 DEMPSEY FOR MISSOURI Grow Missouri 308 E High Street Jefferson City MO 65101 1/13/2014 $25,000.00

C061726 01/14/2014 DEMPSEY FOR MISSOURI Blue Cross Blue Shield of Kansas City PAC Missouri 2301 Main Street Kansas City MO 64108 1/13/2014 $7,500.00

[emphasis added]

Something, something statewide:

C061726: Dempsey For Missouri

Two Westbury Drive Committee Type: Candidate

St Charles Mo 63301 Party Affiliation: Republican

[….] Established Date: 12/29/2006

  Termination Date:

[….]

Election History

Election Year Primary Outcome General Outcome Political Office

2016 Statewide Office

[emphasis added]

Previously:

Campaign Finance: paying Peter, who then pays Paul – part 2 (January 9, 2014)

Grow Missouri has had a recent benefactor:

C131097 12/20/2013 GROW MISSOURI Rex Sinquefield 244 Bent Walnut Westphalia MO 65085 Retired 12/19/2013 $245,000.00

C131097 12/31/2013 GROW MISSOURI Rex Sinquefield 244 Bent Walnut Westphalia MO 65085 Retired 12/30/2013 $250,000.00

[emphasis added]

Fancy that.

Campaign Finance: audit this

14 Tuesday Jan 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

2014, auditor, campaign finance, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, Tom Schweich

Today, at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C111150 01/14/2014 FRIENDS OF TOM SCHWEICH Sam Fox 7701 Forsyth Blvd Suite 600 St Louis MO 63105 Harbour Group Owner 1/14/2014 $100,000.00

[emphasis added]

Well, well, well, is this a new standard? Just asking

HB 1240: abolishing the death penalty

14 Tuesday Jan 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

death penalty, General Assembly, HB 1240, missouri

Representative Jeremy LaFaver (D) on the House floor – January 8, 2014.

A bill, introduced on January 8, 2014, by Representative Jeremy LaFaver (D) (from the bill summary):

HB 1240 [pdf] — DEATH PENALTY

SPONSOR: LaFaver

Currently, the punishment for first degree murder is either life imprisonment without eligibility for parole or death. This bill eliminates the punishment of the death penalty. Any person sentenced to death prior to August 28, 2014, must be sentenced to life imprisonment without parole.

What’s been going on in a few other states since 2007:

LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE LAWS IN STATES THAT RECENTLY REPEALED THE DEATH PENALTY

Since 2007, 6 states have abolished the death penalty; all utilize sentences of life without parole (LWOP)….

….Notes: New Mexico, Connecticut, and Maryland abolished the death penalty prospectively but still have inmates on death row.

Suggested changes are welcome. Information based on DPIC’s questions to state litigators. (As of September 2013).

Campaign Finance: Oh, give me a loan…

13 Monday Jan 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

campaign finance, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission, payday loans

Today, at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C121485 01/13/2014 STAND UP MISSOURI Brundage Management Company, Inc 254 Spencer lane San Antonio TX 78201 1/13/2014 $16,500.00

[emphasis added]

Ironically, they appear to be contributing in installments.

Previously:

Campaign Finance: loan me your ear (December 17, 2013)

SB 519, HB 1307, HB 1313: wait, wait, wait

13 Monday Jan 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

abortion, General Assembly, HB 13, HB 1307, missouri, SB 519, waiting period

Abortion legislation prefiled on December 1, 2013:

SB 519 Amends the current waiting period for having an abortion from 24 hours to 72 hours

Sponsor: Sater

LR Number: 4423S.03I Fiscal Note available

Committee: Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence

Last Action: 1/9/2014 – Second Read and Referred S Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence Committee Journal Page: S64

[emphasis added]

12/1/2013 Prefiled

1/8/2014 S First Read–SB 519-Sater S35

1/9/2014 Second Read and Referred S Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence Committee S64

Introduced in the House on January 9, 2014:

HB 1307

Changes the current waiting period for having an abortion from 24 hours to 72 hours

Sponsor: Elmer, Kevin (139)

Co-Sponsor: Koenig, Andrew (099) … et al.

Proposed Effective Date: 8/28/2014

LR Number: 5074L.01I

Last Action: 01/09/2014 – Introduced and Read First Time (H)

Bill String: HB 1307

Next Hearing: Hearing not scheduled

Calendar: HOUSE BILLS FOR SECOND READING

[emphasis added]

Also introduced in the House on January 9, 2014:

HB 1313

Amends the current waiting period for having an abortion from 24 hours to 72 hours

Sponsor: Frederick, Keith (121)

Proposed Effective Date: 8/28/2014

LR Number: 5277L.01I

Last Action: 01/09/2014 – Introduced and Read First Time (H)

Bill String: HB 1313

Next Hearing: Hearing not scheduled

Calendar: HOUSE BILLS FOR SECOND READING

[emphasis added]

What did anyone expect?

House Republican Caucus press conference – Jefferson City – January 8, 2014

….I intend our agenda this year to focus on four major policy areas – growth and opportunity for all Missourians, guaranteeing access to a great education, generating affordable and abundant energy, and guarding and protecting Missouri values that so many Missourians, uh, regardless of political party, hold dear….

Yeah, right.

House Republican Caucus press conference – Q and A – Jefferson City – January 8, 2014 – part 2

12 Sunday Jan 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

education, General Assembly, missouri, Right to work, Timothy Jones

Previously:

Opening of the 2014 legislative session – photos (January 8, 2014)

House Democratic Caucus press conference – Jefferson City – January 8, 2014 (January 8, 2014)

House Democratic Caucus press conference – Q and A – Jefferson City – January 8, 2014 (January 9, 2014)

House Republican Caucus press conference – Jefferson City – January 8, 2014 (January 10, 2014)

House Republican Caucus press conference – Q and A – Jefferson City – January 8, 2014 – part 1 (January 11, 2014)

“…So, I think the policies out of Washington, D.C. have been an absolute failure. Poverty is on the rise, more people are, are, uh, in the entitlement state, the welfare state than ever before, we’re extending unemployment benefits…”

Entitlement juxtaposed with welfare. We saw what you did there.

U.S. poverty rate remains high even counting government aid

By Susan Heavey

WASHINGTON Wed Nov 6, 2013 3:06pm EST

….The number of poor people in the United States held steady at nearly 50 million last year, but government programs appear to have lessened the impact, especially on children and the elderly, federal data released on Wednesday showed.

The Census Bureau, using an alternative measure to the government’s main poverty gauge, said the figure was virtually unchanged from a year earlier with the overall poverty rate stuck at 16 percent.

But without tax credits, Social Security payments and other benefits, it would have been higher for the very poor, the young and the old, the data showed.

The report supplements the nation’s official poverty data released in September, also by the Census Bureau, that found more than 47 million people living in poverty in 2012, or 15 percent – about the same as in 2011.

[….]

“Millions more people would have been poor in 2012 in the absence of our safety net programs,” said public policy and poverty expert Sheldon Danziger, who heads the Russell Sage Foundation social science research center.

[….]

And republicans complain about extending unemployment benefits. It’s telling that it makes sense to them to cut them off.

“…Well you just said that there are businesses in Missouri who told you that they would benefit from right to work. So, can you name any unionized businesses that, that brought this issue to you so that we can under, talk to them and understand what their issue is?…”

Economic Policy Institute

February 17, 20111

The Compensation penalty of “right-to-work” laws [pdf]

By Elise Gould and Heidi Shierholz

….Once we control for our comprehensive set of both individual and state-level observable characteristics, we find that the mean effect of working in a right-to-work state is a 3.2% reduction in wages for workers in these states. We also find a 2.6 and 4.8 percentage-point reduction in employer-sponsored health insurance and employer-sponsored pensions, respectively. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the wage penalty for nonunionized workers is 3.0%, and the benefit penalty is 2.8 percentage points and 5.3 percentage points for health and pension benefits, respectively….

….The fact is, while RTW legislation misleadingly sounds like a positive change in this weak economy, in reality the opportunity it gives workers is only that to work for lower wages and fewer benefits. For legislators dedicated to making policy on the basis of economic fact rather than ideological passion, our findings indicate that, contrary to the rhetoric of RTW proponents, the data show that workers in “right-to-work” states have lower compensation – both union and nonunion workers alike.

Their issue? Uh, just a wild guess, but “paying workers less” appears to fit.

On Wednesday afternoon the House Republican Caucus held a press conference in the House Lounge after the opening of the legislative session in Jefferson City. Speaker Timothy Jones (r) took questions from the media after his prepared remarks.

This is the second half of the question and answer session.

The video:

The transcript:

Question: The casual observer of this building a month ago would have thought that maybe some corner has been turned, that there is some sort of bipartisan, uh, spirit here that hadn’t existed previously. This morning, listening to your remarks on the floor and even in, in here that same observer might think nothing’s changed, same agenda here, same agenda on the second floor, same tone between the two. Has anything changed since a year ago?

Speaker Timothy Jones (r): You know, I think what you’ve seen in the last two years is a Missouri House and Senate working together like never before. Uh, a super majority of Missourians last November elected a super majority of the current governing caucus to lead this state. They also elected a governor who ran basically on, on our principles. And I think what the casual observer notes is that when we actually have leadership from the second floor, when the Governor actually comes to us, works with us, explains what he wants, answers our questions, provides information we pass bills efficiently and quickly like we did in special session. The reason we passed that bill in special session in the space of one week with a huge overwhelming bipartisan vote was ’cause the Governor for nearly the only time and first time in five years actually worked cooperatively with the legislature as a piece of legislation was moving through the process.  If our Governor wants to cooperate and work with us we can get great things done for the state.

Question: You and your thoughts on the school transfer issue and that Senator Dempsey says it is a top priority, what does that mean for your relationship with the Senate?

Speaker Timothy Jones (r): Uh, you know, I haven’t, I haven’t looked at his remarks exactly, but I know Senator Dempsey wants to provide a great education for all children as well. That’s where our priorities line up.

Question: In your speech you hadn’t mentioned, you didn’t mention the Second Amendment. Obviously, this chamber last year passed a significant gun bill. Do you see us trying to move a similar bill?

Speaker Timothy Jones (r): Uh, at the end, at the end I actually, I actually mention that we’ll continue to protect our devotion to life and rights guaranteed by all our amendments. So, I think that includes the Second Amendment.

Question: Is it a priority for you to try and move something on guns?

Speaker Timothy Jones (r): You know, protecting, protecting the rights that Missourians hold dear, the Second Amendment being one of them, is something, uh, that I will, uh, that I will be happy to continue working with my caucus on.

Question: Are there any bills that you intend to move quickly to the floor in January?

Speaker Timothy Jones (r): I think our number one priority is jobs and the economy. Uh, we, we’ve seen in this nation, uh, over the last five years that many of the things that the government has tried in DC has failed us. In fact, uh, President Obama in, in, and unfortunately had to, is pushing to extend unemployment benefits. Well, we are six years into his presidency, I, I suppose that’s an admission the economy is not improving if more people need to continue to be on unemployment compensation benefits. So, I think the policies out of Washington, D.C. have been an absolute failure. Poverty is on the rise, more people are, are, uh, in the entitlement state, the welfare state than ever before, we’re extending unemployment benefits. This has been the, the, the most, this has been the slowest recovery from a major recession in our lifetimes. So we need to do things differently. And so fostering, creating, facilitating, uh, an environment where current businesses want to expand and stop sitting on the sidelines and new businesses want to come to our state, um, those are gonna be the priorities. And if you look at what our neighboring states have done, uh, they promote tax relief, they promote litigation reform, they promote worker freedom. So those will probably be the topics you’ll see first.

Question: The Governor put out a news release today that pointed out Missouri’s unemployment rate is a full percentage point below the national average, that, um, we were in the top ten in job creation in the last year, we had fifteen thousand jobs in November. Um, and so, but you didn’t mention anything specific when I ask you about what the legislation you all might be, um, pursuing in January. You’re gonna take the next two days off. Um, so I guess there isn’t any particular bill that you wanted to put on in January?

Speaker Timothy Jones (r): I’m actually not taking the next two days off. Uh, I’m gonna be here the rest of today, I’ll be here all day tomorrow, I’ll be here on Monday, we’ll be referring bills immediately tomorrow which is the first time we can do that. Uh, I believe our committees will be meeting. Uh, the Missouri House members will be working very hard the next two weeks. There’s, there’s, there’s no bill that can be put on the floor because it has to go through the process first, Rudy. And I know you know the legislative process. So, as soon as, as soon as we can move bills on to the calendar, uh, they will be. And so the Missouri House is, is fully operational and, uh, and working full time.

Question: [inaudible]

Speaker Timothy Jones (r): Uh, because six of our bordering states have moved in that regard and you’re seeing, you’re seeing job decline, uh, end for the first time in decades in the State of Michigan. You’re finally seeing the bleeding stop there. You’re seeing economic development begin to grow. Uh, this is an issue that we should not fear. Uh, the business community needs not fear it. They know in their hearts that allowing workers the freedom and choice to chose for their own whether to join an organization, where their dues go, uh, that is something that significantly, uh, will result in economic growth, uh, for the state, So, you know, I , I, I, I put, I put the politics aside, I look at the policy, I look at the changes, I look at the economic growth. Why wouldn’t we want to implement one of the policies that will create the strongest economic growth for the state?

Question: There are some [inaudible] that say, this will disrupt, well, labor agreements with a lot of history, a lot of sweat and blood in getting them developed. That this [inaudible] can disrupt labor negotiate, labor relations [inaudible] with some businesses in the St. Louis area.

Speaker Timothy Jones (r): I focus on what Missourians want. And Missourians have told me, the last seven plus years that I’ve been in this legislature, that that would be the single greatest change we can make in our state to foster the most economic growth. These are Missourians who run their businesses, these are Missourians who have seen manufacturing leave, uh, from their districts. You know, if, if it was so, uh, wonderful to be a closed union shop state, without worker freedom, then we wouldn’t have lost all the manufacturing jobs we have over the last few decades, Chrysler would still be here in Fenton, Ford would still be here in Hazelwood, and numerous other manufacturers would not have left this state for the south and the west.

Staffer: Final question [crosstalk]:

Question: If, if right to work is, is so important, uh, I mean, with, uh, fewer than ten percent of Missouri workers unionized, uh, what businesses are you talking about that are telling you that they would benefit from right to work that are already unionized now? Could you name a few?

Speaker Timothy Jones (r): Yeah, I, I, I, I’ve talked to governors in, in other states that have high economic growth and they tell me the checklist is your tax policy, your labor policy, your litigation policy. And, and if you’re not a state that has worker freedom you’re generally passed over.

Question: Well you just said that there are businesses in Missouri who told you that they would benefit from right to work. So, can you name any unionized businesses that, that brought this issue to you so that we can under, talk to them and understand what their issue is?

Speaker Timothy Jones (r): The, these businesses would rather I not disclose them for fear of retribution, so.

Staffer: Thank you. [crosstalk]

Speaker Timothy Jones (r): Thank you all very much. Have a great day.

Speaker Timothy Jones (r).

Playing the God card

12 Sunday Jan 2014

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Baptist Convention, Freedom of speech, Little Sisters of the Poor, missouri, Missouri Family Network, Missouri Family Policy Council, Obamacare lawsuits, Phil Robertson, Religious liberty, tax-returns, tolerance

Ever notice how certain religious types think that their faith is a get-out-of-jail card that excuses just about any kind of nastiness? The most obvious recent example is the conservative braying about religious freedom that was occasioned by the A&E television channel’s half-hearted effort to censure Duck Dynasty’s Phil Robertson, a reality “star” who gifted the public with a few vulgar homophobic, Islamophobic and racist bon mots. According to the conservative commentariat, the statements were A-OK since Robertson claimed that the general nastiness just reflected his faith tradition, and, you know, freedom of speech and religion must surely come into play here. Of course, mired as we are in the culture wars, using God to deflect attention from various types of bigotry has become so commonplace that we hardly notice it anymore – this particular incident only got some play because of the pseudo-celebrity status of Robertson.

If one were, however, to exercise one’s right to freedom of thought and speech and ask what it means about Robertson’s religion that he can use it to justify his bigoted world-view, we might find out that the right-wing concern with freedom of belief and expression is a one-sided proposition. The owner of a British blog, Futile Democracy, aptly summarizes the situation:

The use of the phrase “free expression” – which to the Christian-right means; freedom from any sort of repercussion or challenge – is only ever invoked when the views expressed confirm Christian prejudices. The same people then demand repercussions for anyone, or any business whose expression doesn’t confirm Christian-right prejudices. It’s a terribly hypocritical state of affairs, all in the hope of retaining the get out of bigotry free card for that which they call “faith”.

The same blogger also noted that the intellectual dishonesty involved in playing the God card can have consequences that go even deeper than simple hypocrisy; he notes that conservative evangelicals “are not happy unless their faith dictates the operation of the state, the media, private businesses, the womb of every woman on the planet, and whom individuals are allowed to marry. The arrogance is astounding, and the religious supremacy that promotes and perpetuates homophobia is cancerous.” Amen, brother.

We can see this religious triumphalism at work in Missouri where four representatives of such fundamentalist Christian-centric organizations as the Missouri Baptist Convention, the Missouri Family Network, and the Missouri Family Policy Council have filed a lawsuit to reverse Governor Nixon’s decision that a Missouri law tying state and federal income tax returns mandates allowing same-sex couples married in states other than Missouri to file joint tax returns, which would be in line with federal policy since the overthrow of the Defense of Marriage Act in 2013.

The excuse for the lawsuit is provided by a Missouri constitutional amendment approved in 2004 that bans same-sex marriage. The amendment itself was in large part the work of the very folks who are today citing it in their lawsuit. These people are secure in the free practice and expression of their religion and its tenets. Nobody is forcing them to engage in same sex marriage or associate with such  couples, nor is government suppressing their freedom to express hateful sentiments about such people – although you should please note that expressions of distaste directed at bigoted speech are no more than the exercise of freedom of speech from the other side of the street. Nevertheless, they’re trying to use government to make the precepts of their specific religion the norm for the rest of society, including those of us who not only don’t share their beliefs, but often find them repugnant.  

We see the same dynamic at work in the anti-Obamacare lawsuit filed by the Little Sisters of the Poor. These religious are so preoccupied with the sin of contraception that they believe signing a piece of paper stating that they seek a religious exemption from providing birth control coverage to employees who might desire it would be akin to, as one of their apologists put it, hiring a hit man to kill your neighbor. You see, if they sign that paper, their employees could, theoretically, get birth control coverage from the insurance company free of charge – which process the Little Sisters would be putting into motion by seeking an exemption from doing the same. Of course, since the Little Sisters are insured by a company run by the Christian Brothers which, in turn, qualifies for the exemption, this is not really the case, but, hey, who cares – it’s the principle of the thing, right?

This leads one to ask if perhaps the sensibilities of such folks are so delicate that they are unfit to play certain roles in a diverse society like ours – an important question given the continuing consolidation of hospitals and the growing dominance of Catholic health organizations. The Guardian’s Jill Filipovic very aptly describes attempts on the part of religious organizations to play the God card:

Their claim that even this accommodation violates their religious liberty is telling. These ACA-related “religious liberty” arguments aren’t actually about the freedom to exercise your own religion, or the right to be free of doing something that violates your conscience. These assertions are about an overwhelming sense of entitlement on behalf of religious organizations to force anyone within their reach to adhere to their beliefs.

Those playing the God card, be they religious organizations, their affiliates or followers are acting as if their religious liberty and freedom of expresion is contingent upon denying the same rights to others as well as to defend and perpetuate bigotry. This can’t be what the Founders, sons of the Enlightenment that they were, had in mind when they dealt with the vexing issues of religious liberty. As historian Kenneth Davis notes, George Washington wrote that:

All possess alike liberty of conscience and immunity of citizenship. …For happily the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance requires only that they who live under its protection should demean themselves as good citizens.

Get that bigots? So much for your frayed God card.

Cross-Posted to DailyKos

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • Johnson County Democrats – Knob Noster Fair Parade – May 28, 2026
  • Campaign Finance: once again, so they get it
  • Disrespect
  • “Ooh, ooh! Pick me! Pick me!”
  • Campaign Finance: Oxymoron

Recent Comments

Uh, in case you were… on Some right wingnuts with money…
Winning at losing… on Passing the gas – Donald…
TACO Tuesday | Show… on TACO or Mushrooms?
TACO Tuesday | Show… on So much winning
So much winning | Sh… on Passing the gas – Donald…

Archives

  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,049,215 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...