• About
  • The Poetry of Protest

Show Me Progress

~ covering government and politics in Missouri – since 2007

Show Me Progress

Monthly Archives: February 2012

Two areas of bipartisan agreement

07 Tuesday Feb 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Erick Erickson, GOP Missouri Primary. wasteful spending, GOP Primary, Kevin Engler, missouri

I don’t pay much attention to RedState‘s Erick Erickson so I owe Ed Kilgore of the Washington Monthly for pointing out a fact that suggests that for perhaps the first time ever, Erickson and I are on somewhat the same wavelength. Erickson, whom Kilgore characterizes as a “blogger, pundit and would-be political boss,” as well as an “an ideological commissar,” has made his contempt for the GOP presidential primary lineup well and truly known:

I have routinely been asked who I would endorse. Today, after a lot of reflection on this race, I can honestly say my position has not changed and I would honestly prefer Ace of Spades’ sweet meteor of death than any of the candidates left in the race. […] I can take the easy way out and not endorse because while I recognize politics necessitates compromise, I would have to compromise my intellectual honesty too much to choose any of the remaining candidates.

Lots of room for bipartisan agreement there.

In other news about GOPers speaking the truth, Kilgore spends a little ink on Missouri’s totally symbolic Republican primary, which is taking place today. Kilgore observes that the situation came about because, just like their federal cohorts, the GOP legislators at the state level are evidently incapable of restraining themselves from using important legislation to try to score unrelated political victories.

In this case, legislation that would have moved Missouri’s GOP primary to a time slot acceptable to the Republican National Committee was loaded up with poison pills. So Missouri citizens who are facing cuts to almost every conceivable government service, are paying for this boondoggle primary because the gentlemen and ladies of the Grand Old Party couldn’t get their priorities straight.

Kilgore quotes state GOP Senator Kevin Engler who dubbed it “the dumbest thing I’ve ever seen in my time in the legislature.” I say “hear, hear.” A singular bipartisan adventure for both Engler and me I’ll wager.  

McCaskill stands up for unions

07 Tuesday Feb 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Claire McCaskill, FAA spending authorization, Federal Aviation Agency, missouri, Union-busting, Unions

Yesterday, Claire McCaskill voted to oppose  a compromise bill to authorize Federal Aviation Agency (FAA) spending. She, along with 20 other Senators, voted against weakening a National Mediation Board ruling allowing airline and railroad employees to form a union by a simple majority of those voting. The compromise would, as DailyKos Labor‘s Laura Clawson describes it, permit employers to:

… control information about what workers should be eligible to vote in an election, allowing them to pad the numbers required for the 50 percent of workers now required to even hold an election. Then employers would be able to delay the election, find out which workers were supporting the union and intimidate them. Not only that, but in cases where a larger non-union airline and a smaller union airline merged, the union and the contract would just be gone.

GOP efforts to gut union protections have held up a long-term FAA authorization for five years, and the compromise was negotiated by the Senate Democratic leadership. Add these considerations to the fact that there were lots of good things in the bill – it will facilitate the transition from radar to GPS flight control, for instance – and it becomes clear that remaining steadfast in support of the unions represents a reasonably tough-minded stance for a politician who has reliably wavered on most progressive issues.

Last week, McCasill scored when she stood up for reproductive rights and signed a letter protesting the Komen Foundation’s politically motivated treatment of Planned Parenthood. This week, by standing up for the right of unions to organize, she scored big for a second time. Who knows, maybe acting like a progressive will become a new habit for Senator McCasill – and if not, it’s good to know that there at least two issues on which we can count on her support.

I Voted in the Missouri Presidential Primary (And So Can You!)…

07 Tuesday Feb 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

2012, missouri, president, Primary

…if you’re registered to vote.

At 7:15 a.m. I was the sixth person to vote in my precinct of close to two thousand registered voters. It’s safe to say that turnout won’t be stellar. One of the Kansas City morning television shows wasn’t helping much, telling their viewers that the presidential primary is an “opinion poll” (okay, it is, but it’s still fun).

Voters weren’t exactly beating down the doors over an hour after the polls opened.

When you’re done voting you can get a cool sticker.

A poll worker told me they didn’t get their first voter until fifteen minutes after they opened their doors.

And, in yesterday’s mail came a demonstration of an alleged fiscal conservative’s election strategery:

Campaign spam. They must have an unlimited supply of money somewhere.

Would any sane person really want these individuals as references?

Yep, his campaign sent not one, but two identical direct mail pieces (glossy, slick, and expensive) to a household that wouldn’t vote for him no matter what. Well, okay, at least not in a general election.

Previously:

Rick Santorum (r) in Lee’s Summit, Missouri (February 3, 2012)

Sen. Will Kraus (r): warming up the crowd about urban schools at the Santorum rally (February 4, 2012)

Rick Santorum in Lee’s Summit, Missouri: the Blutarsky sermon on the summit (February 4, 2012)

The Missouri Presidential Primary Vote: do your part to make it so (February 7, 2012)

The Missouri Presidential Primary Vote: do your part to make it so

07 Tuesday Feb 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

2012, missouri, Mitt Romney, PPP, president, Primary, Public Policy Polling, Rick Santorum

Previously:

Rick Santorum (r) in Lee’s Summit, Missouri (February 3, 2012)

Sen. Will Kraus (r): warming up the crowd about urban schools at the Santorum rally (February 4, 2012)

Rick Santorum in Lee’s Summit, Missouri: the Blutarsky sermon on the summit (February 4, 2012)

The republican beauty contest presidential primary is today. Do your part to make it so:

Public Policy Polling

Big Day Possible for Santorum [pdf]

Q2 The Republican candidates for President on the ballot in Missouri are Ron Paul, Mitt Romney, and Rick Santorum. If the election was today, who would you vote for?

Ron Paul – 19%

Mitt Romney – 32%

Rick Santorum – 45%

Someone else/Not sure – 4%

[emphasis added]

Politics makes strange bedfellows, albeit with very different agendas, from the crosstabs:

2012 GOP Pres Primary

Ideology

Very liberal

Ron Paul – 18%

Mitt Romney – 18%

Rick Santorum – 63%

Someone else/Not sure – 0%

[….]

Tea Party ID

Yes

Ron Paul – 18%

Mitt Romney – 25%

Rick Santorum – 54%

Someone else/Not sure – 2%

[emphasis added]

Heh.

The PPP poll interviewed 958 likely primary voters in Missouri on February 6th. The margin of error was 3.2%.

Remember, to take part in the Missouri Democratic Party delegate selection process (caucus) you must have cast a ballot in today’s election. It doesn’t matter which ballot.

Campaign Finance: Lt. Gov. – still working the phones

06 Monday Feb 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

campaign finance, Cynthia Davis, Judy Baker, missouri

Previously: Campaign Finance: some candidates for Lieutenant Governor have been working the phones of late (February 4, 2012)

Today, at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C121030 02/06/2012 JUDY BAKER FOR MISSOURI Miriam Butt 1029 Yale Columbia MO 65203 retired homemaker 1/23/2012 $1,000.00

C121030 02/06/2012 JUDY BAKER FOR MISSOURI Schafer Fertilizer PO Box 2 Martinsburg MO 65264 1/23/2012 $1,000.00

C121030 02/06/2012 JUDY BAKER FOR MISSOURI David Mehr 714 Engleside columbia MO 65201 University of Missouri Physician 1/31/2012 $2,000.00

C121030 02/06/2012 JUDY BAKER FOR MISSOURI James Jenkins 150 N. Central Ave Clayton MO 63105 retired physician 1/31/2012 $1,000.00

C121030 02/06/2012 JUDY BAKER FOR MISSOURI Jane Fike 1318 cedarwood Fulton MO 65251 retired retired 1/26/2012 $1,000.00

C121030 02/06/2012 JUDY BAKER FOR MISSOURI Patterson Todd 4520 Rockhill Kansas City MO 64110 self consultant 2/3/2012 $1,000.00

C121030 02/06/2012 JUDY BAKER FOR MISSOURI steve gnatz 1117 Forest Wheaton IL 60187 Loyola University Physician 2/3/2012 $1,000.00

C121030 02/06/2012 JUDY BAKER FOR MISSOURI Hilda Jones PO Box 57 Williamsburg MO 63388 retired retired 2/3/2012 $5,000.00

C121030 02/06/2012 JUDY BAKER FOR MISSOURI Karen Cox 4929 Westwood Kansas City MO 64112 Children’s Mercy Exec VP 2/3/2012 $1,000.00

[emphasis added]

Even the lunatic fringe is getting into the big money:

C010984 02/06/2012 ELECT CYNTHIA DAVIS Kammermann Ext. Co. Inc P.O. 564 3451 Bray Road Farmington MO 63640 2/4/2012 $1,000.00

[emphasis added]

Has Mitt Romney Shown Religious Intolerance

06 Monday Feb 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Has Mitt Romney Shown Religious Intolerance?

Here is a new rough draft for a TV commercial I will be producing for the Democratic Super PAC AmericanLP. Please send me suggestions and criticisms.

“Religious Tolerance”

:60 Second TV Ad

***

Opening video of Rev Jeremiah Wright “God Damn America!”

Voiceover: “Intolerance is ugly in whatever form it takes, especially when it flows from the pulpit.”

(Text only: “November 19, 1993,”) Voiceover “the Mitt Romney family baptized Mitt Romney’s father-in-law, Edward Davies, 13 months AFTER Davies had died. Davies was a lifelong opponent of organized religion. Was this tolerant of Davies Wishes?”

(Text and images: On March 22, 1969, Ed Davies daughter Ann married Mitt Romney.) Voiceover: “Neither of Ann Romney’s parents was allowed into the Romney wedding ceremony performed at the Salt Lake Temple. Non-Mormons are not tolerated at the wedding ceremonies of Mormons.”

(text: “From 1966-1969, Mitt Romney was a full-time employee of the Mormon Church. Romney was appointed Bishop in the Mormon Church. Romney became one of the largest multi-million dollar donors of the Mormon Church”) Voiceover: “Since the 60s, Mitt Romney has been a powerful, influential Mormon Church leader.  Mormons did not accept that Black people had full souls equal to Whites until 1978. What kind of leader promotes an organization that had an official policy of racial intolerance?”

Closing graphic in text “In 2012, vote in favor of religious tolerance.”

“Paid for by AmericanLP”

Lt. Gov. – there is another

06 Monday Feb 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

2012, Lieutenant Governor, missouri, Sara Lampe

In addition to Susan Montee (D), Judy Baker (D), and Becky Plattner (D) there is another Democratic candidate for Lieutenant Governor. The press release went out about a half hour ago:

State Representative Lampe to announce candidacy for Lieutenant Governor

SPRINGFIELD – Building on her strong record of leadership, coalition building and getting results that matter, State Representative Sara Lampe (D-Springfield) will announce her candidacy for Lt Governor on Monday, February 6 at the Plaster Student Union, Room 313 at 10:00 a.m.

As the ranking member on the crucial budget committee in Missouri’s House of Representatives, Lampe has for years focused attention to crucial funding needs for our seniors, public education, and healthcare. “These are difficult times for working families and seniors,” said Lampe, “My experience in public education, running a small business and balancing the state budget have uniquely prepared me to take on this this new challenge.”

Having never before run for office, she unseated an incumbent in 2004 to represent the 138th district in central Springfield. Area leaders agree that Lampe has shown strong leadership.”Sara Lampe has consistently promoted common sense values when it comes to public policy “says Annie Busch, former Springfield-Greene County Library Director

Lampe, a retired teacher and administrator devoted her career to fighting for children with special needs and as a state representative she has fought for working people, for seniors, for fairness in employment practices and against public policies that harm our most vulnerable citizens.

###

Campaign Finance: Gov. Jay Nixon (D) has a super Sunday

05 Sunday Feb 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

2012, campaign finance, governor, Jay Nixon, missouri, Missouri Ethics Commission

Today, at the Missouri Ethics Commission:

C001135 02/05/2012 JAY NIXON FOR MISSOURI McKelvey Homes 218 Chesterfield Towne Centre Chesterfield MO 63005 2/3/2012 $1,500.00

C001135 02/05/2012 JAY NIXON FOR MISSOURI Noranda Aluminum, Inc. 391 St. Jude Industrial Park New Madrid MO 63869 2/3/2012 $10,000.00

C001135 02/05/2012 JAY NIXON FOR MISSOURI Bank of America Missouri PAC 800 Market Street 15th Floor Saint Louis MO 63101 2/3/2012 $10,000.00

C001135 02/05/2012 JAY NIXON FOR MISSOURI Home Building Industry PAC 10104 Old Olive Street Road Saint Louis MO 63141 2/3/2012 $5,000.00

C001135 02/05/2012 JAY NIXON FOR MISSOURI Brown & Crouppen, PC One Metropolitan Square Suite 1600 Saint Louis MO 63102 2/3/2012 $25,000.00

C001135 02/05/2012 JAY NIXON FOR MISSOURI McBride & Son Management Company 16091 Swingley Ridge Road Suite 300 Chesterfield MO 63017 2/3/2012 $1,000.00

C001135 02/05/2012 JAY NIXON FOR MISSOURI John Bardgett & Associates, Inc. 16141 Swingley Ridge Road Suite 110 Chesterfield MO 63017 2/3/2012 $5,000.00

C001135 02/05/2012 JAY NIXON FOR MISSOURI St. Louis Cardinals, LLC 700 Clark Street Saint Louis MO 63102 2/3/2012 $5,000.00

C001135 02/05/2012 JAY NIXON FOR MISSOURI Leonard Riggio 720 Park Avenue Apt. 10A New York NY 10021 Barnes & Noble, Inc. Chairman 2/3/2012 $5,000.00

C001135 02/05/2012 JAY NIXON FOR MISSOURI Kenneth Stricker 6 Appaloosa Court Chesterfield MO 63005 Consort Homes President & CEO 2/3/2012 $1,000.00

You’d think the packaging industry would step up to the plate, you know, just to keep up. Oh, wait…

How to talk Republican

05 Sunday Feb 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

earmarks, GOP rhetoric, missouri, Roy Blunt, Solyndra, stimulus

Here’s one of Roy Blunt recent tweets:

I voted against an amdt to cede one of Congress’s core constitutional duties to Pres Obama & unaccountable bureaucrats bit.ly/wm6Lt4

Care to hazard a guess about what that means? If you’re curious, just follow the link, which leads you to a press release where you’ll learn that Blunt’s congratulating himself on his vote to preserve earmarks.

So why didn’t the Senator just say so? Could it be because earmarks pose a problem for him? Blunt’s for ’em. Lots of the right wingers he relies on are agin ’em. (Here’s a golden-oldie from RedState’s Erik on topic of Blunt and earmarks). Because these are the folks who held their nose and promoted Blunt to the Senate despite his lobbyist-loving, high-spending, big government ways, I’m betting that the double-speak above is meant to help finesse his earmarking proclivities with that important constituency. Consider this passage from his press release:

Directing federal spending is a congressional responsibility that is mandated by the U.S. Constitution, and lawmakers do our constituents a disservice by statutorily yielding this power to the White House and to the thousands of nameless, faceless bureaucrats in Washington who are completely unaccountable to the people whose dollars they spend.

The largest Obama earmark was the President’s nearly trillion dollar stimulus bill, which was doled out without congressional input and ultimately failed to create or save the jobs that were promised by the White House. Most recently, we witnessed what happens when President Obama is given unbridled power during the Solyndra debacle – just one piece of the stimulus that proved to be a reprehensible waste of taxpayers’ dollars

Nameless, faceless bureaucrats! Imagine! But that’s just one of the Pavlovian bells and whistles embedded in this seemingly bland piece of apparent boiler-plate; there’s a constitutional something-or-the-other (anything modified by constitutional goes over big with the Tea Partiers), tried and true and, incidentaly, demonstrably false, anti-stimulus rhetoric, and the pretense that the pathetic effort to make noise about the small-peas Solyndra failure represents something more than a GOP desperate for at least one good Obama administration scandal.

To give you an idea about just how canned these references are, and how divorced from reality, consider the almost ritual evocation of the stimulus. If I remember correctly, lots of GOPers were decrying the stimulus as nothing but earmarked pork – while, at the same time, many were trying to get as big a bite of that pork as they could manage.  Senator Blunt chooses to ignore this aspect of the stimulus spending. We do learn, however, that because the bulk of the stimulus was allocated by government agencies according to formulas that guarantee a certain degree of accountability, Blunt thinks it was “Obama’s earmark,” which, in spite of his approval of earmarks, he believes to be a bad thing. My mind reels.

The poet Charles Simic, writing about the New Hampshire GOP primary in the New York Review of Books (Feb. 23) (accessible to subscribers only), made a telling observation about how synthetic and empty conservative rhetoric has become:

A local newspaper editor told me that the opinions in the many letters and e-mails he receives have become less identifiable as written by distinct individuals than ever before. From their prose it seems that their minds were apparently made up by someone else. Practically every businessman will tell you the same thing about the economy, he said; practically all the social conservatives will say that what’s wrong with this country is its moral values. The letters to the editor he receives increasingly use identical words and phrases that come from flyers the writers receive in the mail.

One could say much the same thing about the statements of GOP pols like Blunt. From focus groups and strategists to politicians’ mouths, and finally, to Tea Partiers’ ears, it’s all the same. Simic begins his NYR essay with a quote from Samuel Beckett’s Murphy that sums it up nicely:

The fool in league with the knave against himself is a combination that none may withstand.

Rick Santorum in Lee's Summit, Missouri: the Blutarsky sermon on the summit

05 Sunday Feb 2012

Posted by Michael Bersin in Uncategorized

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

missouri, Rick Santorum

Rick Santorum (r) in Lee’s Summit, Missouri.

Friday night republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum held a rally in Lee’s Summit, Missouri as a prelude to Tuesday’s beauty contest primary.

Bluto: What? Over? Did you say “over”? Nothing is over until we decide it is! Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!

Otter: [to Boon] Germans?

Boon: Forget it, he’s rolling.

Bluto: And it ain’t over now. ‘Cause when the goin’ gets tough…

[thinks hard of something to say]

Bluto: The tough get goin’! Who’s with me? Let’s go!

[Bluto runs out, alone; then returns]

Previously:

Rick Santorum (r) in Lee’s Summit, Missouri (February 3, 2012)

Sen. Will Kraus (r): warming up the crowd about urban schools at the Santorum rally (February 4, 2012)

Rick Santorum (r): ….Barack Obama runs around talking about the right to health care. Where do rights come from? [voices: “God.”] They don’t come from the government. They don’t, but the government cannot [inaudible] you a right. If they can give you a right, what can they do? [voices: “Take it away.”] Take it away from you. And the other thing they can do is they can tell you how you’re gonna exercise that right. They can tell you what you’re gonna get and what you’re not gonna get because they’re giving it to you.

Look at just what happened last week in the Catholic Church. I know many of you were at Mass this past week. [applause] But in most dioceses in the country, about a hundred and forty of ’em, was, a letter was read by bishops, outraged, outraged, that the Federal Government would tell Catholic institutions in America that they have to provide abortifacients, morning after pills, sterilization services, as well as contraception as part of free health care in their health care policies. Every Catholic institution. Even though the Catholic Church specifically teaches against those things. And Catholic institutions were outraged that they would do this. I told the Catholic bishops when they were promoting it and shilling for Obamacare, careful what you wish for. Because when the government gives you something then they can force you to do things because it’s now, they now have you, right. They got what they deserved. They fell, they, they fell in bed with the secular left and then wondered why they’re forcing them to do what the secular left wants them to do….

Teabagger logic. It’s not a right, and if you don’t have it, the government can’t take it away from you. And if you’re not gonna get it, they can’t tell you that you’re not gonna get it.

Rick Santorum (r):….The reason this economy is sputtering is because our economy and our people are not used to being put under a yoke that we have been put under by this administration [cheers, applause]….

The yoke is on you.

….And if you look at the other issues that frame, well, actually, it started the tea party movement, which is the conservative backbone of Republican Party right now. [applause] Right? [cheers] You look to the reasons why the tea party movement was created, it started because of the sell out of the Bush administration, John McCain, and [inaudible] Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney, for the Wall Street bailouts. When things got tough and everybody was in a panic, when Goldman Sachs went to them and said, we need your money, they said, yes….

….Ladies and gentlemen, we need somebody who’s much more multidimensional than, than, than Governor Romney and not as multidimensional and every idea in the world as Newt Gingrich. [laughter, applause] I probably should, no moon colonies, I promise. [applause] Right?….

….So I appreciate the tea party and their standing for the Constitution. It is a great guide for a president that has been lost. I can tell you, having served in Washington in the nineteen nineties and in the early part of the, this century, you didn’t hear this thing mentioned very often when it came to government. And I know a lot of people are frustrated that the Republicans, it’s true, Republicans lost their way. And I, too, am not perfect in the sense that sometimes I voted for the thing, I look back and say, why did I do that? Well, sometimes you need some people to remind you. Sometimes things have to get so bad that we realize how far we strayed. We all became too comfortable. And I know there’ve been a lot of folks that are critical of, of Republicans for the work they did. I would just say this to the tea partiers, where were you when we needed you? Where were you when you had to come out to remind us and stand up and fight. And so [inaudible] you’re here now. And this is your moment. Not just tea party, but conservatives all across the [inaudible], this is our moment. This is our opportunity….

* IOKIYAR

….We have to [inaudible] understand what our heritage is. It’s not just the Constitution. But it’s that other document that the left tries to ignore. Push away. They try to expunge it because it is a threat [inaudible]. You see, the left believes, as I said before, that rights come from the government and from the Supreme Court or from some other government [inaudible]. But we all know, because of that other document, which isn’t the how of America, it’s not the owner’s manual, it’s the why of America. When people talk about American exceptionalism, believe it or not, they’re not referring to our Constitution. They’re not referring to our system of government, not referring to our military or our power. They’re referring, I believe, to these words, we hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal and endowed by their [pause] [voices: “Creator.”] with certain unalienable rights, among them life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. [applause]….

….I remind everybody that at the time of the revolution there was another revolution. It was in France. And if you look at the French Constitution, there’ve been about eighteen of ’em since, we’ve had one. Why? Is it because or Constitution was written better? No. No. [inaudible] Or Constitution wasn’t written that much better than the French Constitution. Or any of the interim French Constitutions. The problem was France. From the very beginning of the revolution until now. It’s that France has a different Declaration of Independence. The reason for the French revolution, unlike the American revolution, was not that the king denied us our God given rights. The reason for the French revolution, there were three words, liberty, fraternity, and equality. Liberty and equality, that’s what those, words of our declaration, right? But that third word is not. There are two different words. One was fraternity, brotherhood, the other was, and that’s where the rights came from [inaudible], as opposed to, creator, God. It was a secular revolution. And when you give enormous power to people, guess what happens? They take that power and they build guillotines. Because they have no rights they have to respect other than the rights that the government gives you.

And so when the left, as they’re doing in America today, tries to marginalize faith, tries to marginalize the declaration, tries to marginalize where we get our rights from, it is why I say this election is the
most important election in American history. Because they are undermining the very essence of what American’s [inaudible]….

Freedom fries rule.

….A lot of folks look at me and say, you know, Rick, we really like you. We like you best, but you can’t win. Hear it all the time. If you look at Florida, who had the highest favorability ratings in the State of Florida on election day? [voices: “Rick.”] Me. Who had the highest positive negative in the country, most of the polls? I did. Yet, people say I can’t win. They say, well, you know, you can’t win. Well why can’t I win? You know, you’re one of those social conservatives. [applause] You’re one of those social conservatives. [cheers] You talk about faith and family and we just want to hear about jobs. You see, America isn’t about jobs….

No mas. You can’t win. You’re an idiot. I’m going to crossover in Tuesday’s republican primary beauty contest so I can vote for you. To punish your party for the hour of my life I spent in Lee’s Summit listening to you which I’m never going to get back.

…I was appalled yesterday to hear Governor Romney say that he doesn’t care about the very poor. As long as the safety net is there, if it’s, if it’s broken I’ll fix it. But he cares about the ninety-five percent of America. Doesn’t care about the very poor or the very rich. We already have one president who cares about ninety-nine percent. We don’t need one that cares about ninety-five percent. We need one that cares about a hundred percent of America. [applause][cheers]….

I’m not so sure he thought this one through.

Income, Poverty and Health Insurance in the United States: 2010 – Highlights

The data presented here are from the Current Population Survey (CPS), 2011 Annual Social and Economic Supplement (ASEC), the source of official poverty estimates. The CPS ASEC is a sample survey of approximately 100,000 household nationwide. These data reflect conditions in calendar year 2010.

 *  The official poverty rate in 2010 was 15.1 percent – up from 14.3 percent in 2009. This was the third consecutive annual increase in the poverty rate. Since 2007, the poverty rate has increased by 2.6 percentage points, from 12.5 percent to 15.1 percent.

 *  In 2010, 46.2 million people were in poverty, up from 43.6 million in 2009-the fourth consecutive annual increase in the number of people in poverty.

 *  Between 2009 and 2010, the poverty rate increased for non-Hispanic Whites (from 9.4 percent to 9.9 percent), for Blacks (from 25.8 percent to 27.4 percent), and for Hispanics (from 25.3 percent to 26.6 percent). For Asians, the 2010 poverty rate (12.1 percent) was not statistically different from the 2009 poverty rate.

 *  The poverty rate in 2010 (15.1 percent) was the highest poverty rate since 1993 but was 7.3 percentage points lower than the poverty rate in 1959, the first year for which poverty estimates are available.

 *  The number of people in poverty in 2010 (46.2 million) is the largest number in the 52 years for which poverty estimates have been published.

 *  Between 2009 and 2010, the poverty rate increased for children under age 18 (from 20.7 percent to 22.0 percent) and people aged 18 to 64 (from 12.9 percent to 13.7 percent), but was not statistically different for people aged 65 and older (9.0 percent).

Do the math, Rick, Mitt only cares about eighty-four percent.

* it’s okay if you’re a republican

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Recent Posts

  • Perfect timing
  • Mark Alford (r): that right wingnut echo chamber just got a lot smaller
  • Medicare for All
  • Campaign Finance: wasted money
  • Mississippi Goddam

Recent Comments

Campaign Finance: wa… on Missouri republicans: an etern…
Campaign Finance: wa… on Campaign Finance: no quarter
Campaign Finance: wa… on Campaign Finance: Next
Mike’s Blog Round-Up… on Mark Alford (r): you can smell…
Mark Alford (r): you… on Mark Alford (r): manufacturing…

Archives

  • November 2026
  • October 2026
  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007

Categories

  • campaign finance
  • Claire McCaskill
  • Congress
  • Democratic Party News
  • Eric Schmitt
  • Healthcare
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Interview
  • Jason Smith
  • Josh Hawley
  • Mark Alford
  • media criticism
  • meta
  • Missouri General Assembly
  • Missouri Governor
  • Missouri House
  • Missouri Senate
  • Resist
  • Roy Blunt
  • social media
  • Standing Rock
  • Town Hall
  • Uncategorized
  • US Senate

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Blogroll

  • Balloon Juice
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Digby
  • I Spy With My Little Eye
  • Lawyers, Guns, and Money
  • No More Mister Nice Blog
  • The Great Orange Satan
  • Washington Monthly
  • Yael Abouhalkah

Donate to Show Me Progress via PayPal

Your modest support helps keep the lights on. Click on the button:

Blog Stats

  • 1,103,467 hits

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...